Slicing a protease: structural features of the ATP-dependent Lon proteases gleaned from investigations of isolated domains

ATP-dependent Lon proteases are multi-domain enzymes found in all living organisms. All Lon proteases contain an ATPase domain belonging to the AAA(+) superfamily of molecular machines and a proteolytic domain with a serine-lysine catalytic dyad. Lon proteases can be divided into two subfamilies, LonA and LonB, exemplified by the Escherichia coli and Archaeoglobus fulgidus paralogs, respectively. The LonA subfamily is defined by the presence of a large N-terminal domain, whereas the LonB subfamily has no such domain, but has a membrane-spanning domain that anchors the protein to the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. The two subfamilies also differ in their consensus sequences. Recent crystal structures for several individual domains and sub-fragments of Lon proteases have begun to illuminate similarities and differences in structure-function relationships between the two subfamilies. Differences in orientation of the active site residues in several isolated Lon protease domains point to possible roles for the AAA(+) domains and/or substrates in positioning the catalytic residues within the active site. Structures of the proteolytic domains have also indicated a possible hexameric arrangement of subunits in the native state of bacterial Lon proteases. The structure of a large segment of the N-terminal domain has revealed a folding motif present in other protein families of unknown function and should lead to new insights regarding ways in which Lon interacts with substrates or other cellular factors. These first glimpses of the structure of Lon are heralding an exciting new era of research on this ancient family of proteases.     

Classification of ATP-dependent proteases Lon and comparison of the active sites of their proteolytic domains.

ATP-dependent Lon proteases belong to the superfamily of AAA+ proteins. Until recently, the identity of the residues involved in their proteolytic active sites was not elucidated. However, the putative catalytic Ser-Lys dyad was recently suggested through sequence comparison of more than 100 Lon proteases from various sources. The presence of the catalytic dyad was experimentally confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli Lon protease and by determination of the crystal structure of its proteolytic domain. Furthermore, this extensive sequence analysis allowed the definition of two subfamilies of Lon proteases, LonA and LonB, based on the consensus sequences in the active sites of their proteolytic domains. These differences strictly associate with the specific characteristics of their AAA+ modules, as well as with the presence or absence of an N-terminal domain.     

The Thermoplasma acidophilum Lon protease has a Ser-Lys dyad active site.

A gene with significant similarity to bacterial Lon proteases was identified during the sequencing of the genome of the thermoacidophilic archaeon Thermoplasma acidophilum. Protein sequence comparison revealed that Thermoplasma Lon protease (TaLon) is more similar to the LonB proteases restricted to Gram-positive bacteria than to the widely distributed bacterial LonA. However, the active site residues of the protease and ATPase domain are highly conserved in all Lon proteases. Using site-directed mutagenesis we show here that TaLon and EcLon, and probably all other Lon proteases, contain a Ser-Lys dyad active site. The TaLon active site mutants were fully assembled and, similar to TaLon wild-type, displayed an apparent molar mass of 430 kDa upon gelfiltration. This would be consistent with a hexameric complex and indeed electron micrographs of TaLon revealed ring-shaped particles, although of unknown symmetry. Comparison of the ATPase activity of Lon wild-type from Thermoplasma or Escherichia coli with respective protease active site mutants revealed differences in Km and V values. This suggests that in the course of protein degradation by wild-type Lon the protease domain might influence the activity of the ATPase domain.     

Atomic-resolution crystal structure of the proteolytic domain of Archaeoglobus fulgidus lon reveals the conformational variability in the active sites of lon proteases

The atomic-resolution crystal structure of the proteolytic domain (P-domain, residues 415-621) of Archaeoglobus fulgidus B-type Lon protease (wtAfLonB) and the structures of several mutants have revealed significant differences in the conformation of the active-site residues when compared to other known Lon P-domains, despite the conservation of the overall fold. The catalytic Ser509 is facing the solvent and is distant from Lys552, the other member of the catalytic dyad. Instead, the adjacent Asp508 forms an ion pair with the catalytic lysine residue. Glu506, an analog of the putative third catalytic residue from a related Methanococcus jannaschii LonB, also faces the solvent and does not interact with the catalytic dyad. We have established that full-length wtAfLonB is proteolytically active in an ATP-dependent manner. The loss of enzymatic activity of the S509A mutant confirms the functional significance of this residue, while retention of considerable level of activity by the D508A and E506A mutants rules out their critical involvement in catalysis. In contrast to the full-length enzymes, all individually purified P-domains (wild-type and mutants) were inactive, and the mutations had no influence on the active-site structure. These findings raise the possibility that, although isolated proteolytic domains of both AfLonB and E.coli LonA are able to assemble into expected functional hexamers, the presence of the other domains, as well as substrate binding, may be needed to stabilize the productive conformation of their active sites. Thus, the observed conformational variability may reflect the differences in the stability of active-site structures for the proteolytic counterparts of single-chain Lon versus independently folded proteolytic subunits of two-chain AAA+ proteases.     

A membrane-bound archaeal Lon protease displays ATP-independent proteolytic activity towards unfolded proteins and ATP-dependent activity for folded proteins

In contrast to the eucaryal 26S proteasome and the bacterial ATP-dependent proteases, little is known about the energy-dependent proteolysis in members of the third domain, Archae. We cloned a gene homologous to ATP-dependent Lon protease from a hyperthermophilic archaeon and observed the unique properties of the archaeal Lon. Lon from Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 (Lon(Tk)) is a 70-kDa protein with an N-terminal ATPase domain belonging to the AAA(+) superfamily and a C-terminal protease domain including a putative catalytic triad. Interestingly, a secondary structure prediction suggested the presence of two transmembrane helices within the ATPase domain and Western blot analysis using specific antiserum against the recombinant protein clearly indicated that Lon(Tk) was actually a membrane-bound protein. The recombinant Lon(Tk) possessed thermostable ATPase activity and peptide cleavage activity toward fluorogenic peptides with optimum temperatures of 95 and 70 degrees C, respectively. Unlike the enzyme from Escherichia coli, we found that Lon(Tk) showed higher peptide cleavage activity in the absence of ATP than it did in the presence of ATP. When three kinds of proteins with different thermostabilities were examined as substrates, it was found that Lon(Tk) required ATP for degradation of folded proteins, probably due to a chaperone-like function of the ATPase domain, along with ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, Lon(Tk) degraded unfolded proteins in an ATP-independent manner, suggesting a mode of action in Lon(Tk) different from that of its bacterial counterpart.     

Role of α-helical domains in functioning of ATP-dependent Lon protease of Escherichia coli

Homooligomeric ATP-dependent LonA proteases are bifunctional enzymes belonging to the superfamily of AAA⁺ proteins. Their subunits are formed by five successively connected domains, i.e., N-terminal (N), α-helical (HI(CC)), nucleotide-binding (NB), the second α-helical (H), and proteolytic (P) domains. The presence of the inserted HI(CC) domain determines the uniqueness of LonA proteases among the AAA⁺ proteins. The role of the α-helical domains in the LonA protease functioning was studied with an example of E. coli Lon protease (Ec-Lon). The properties of the intact Ec-Lon and its mutant forms, i.e., Lon-R164A and Lon-R542A bearing the substituted arginine residues at the similar positions in the HI(CC) and H domains, were compared. The H domain was shown to play a crucial role in ATP hydrolysis and enzyme binding to the target protein. The HI(CC) domain is not decisive for the manifestation of the catalytic properties of the enzyme. However, it affects the functioning of Lon ATPase and peptidase sites and is involved in maintaining enzyme stability. The participation of the HI(CC) domain in the formation of three-dimensional structures of LonA proteases and/or their complexes with DNA is suggested.     

Crystal structure of Lon protease: molecular architecture of gated entry to a sequestered degradation chamber

Lon proteases are distributed in all kingdoms of life and are required for survival of cells under stress. Lon is a tandem fusion of an AAA+ molecular chaperone and a protease with a serine‐lysine catalytic dyad. We report the 2.0‐Å resolution crystal structure of Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 Lon (TonLon). The structure is a three‐tiered hexagonal cylinder with a large sequestered chamber accessible through an axial channel. Conserved loops extending from the AAA+ domain combine with an insertion domain containing the membrane anchor to form an apical domain that serves as a gate governing substrate access to an internal unfolding and degradation chamber. Alternating AAA+ domains are in tight‐ and weak‐binding nucleotide states with different domain orientations and intersubunit contacts, reflecting intramolecular dynamics during ATP‐driven protein unfolding and translocation. The bowl‐shaped proteolytic chamber is contiguous with the chaperone chamber allowing internalized proteins direct access to the proteolytic sites without further gating restrictions.     

Limited proteolysis of E. coli ATP-dependent protease Lon - a unified view of the subunit architecture and characterization of isolated enzyme fragments

We carried out chymotryptic digestion of multimeric ATP-dependent Lon protease from Escherichia coli. Four regions sensitive to proteolytic digestion were located in the enzyme and several fragments corresponding to the individual structural domains of the enzyme or their combinations were isolated. It was shown that (i) unlike the known AAA(+) proteins, the ATPase fragment (A) of Lon has no ATPase activity in spite of its ability to bind nucleotides, and it is monomeric in solution regardless of the presence of any effectors; (ii) the monomeric proteolytic domain (P) does not display proteolytic activity; (iii) in contrast to the inactive counterparts, the AP fragment is an oligomer and exhibits both the ATPase and proteolytic activities. However, unlike the full-length Lon, its AP fragment oligomerizes into a dimer or a tetramer only, exhibits the properties of a non-processive protease, and undergoes self-degradation upon ATP hydrolysis. These results reveal the crucial role played by the non-catalytic N fragment of Lon (including its coiled-coil region), as well as the contribution of individual domains to creation of the quaternary structure of the full-length enzyme, empowering its function as a processive protease.     

Membrane protein degradation by AAA proteases in mitochondria: extraction of substrates from either membrane surface

Two AAA proteases, each with its catalytic site at the opposite membrane surface, mediate the ATP-dependent degradation of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins. We demonstrate here that a model substrate polypeptide containing hydrophilic domains at both sides of the membrane can be completely degraded by either of the AAA proteases, if solvent-exposed domains are in an unfolded state. A short protein tail protruding from the membrane surface is sufficient to allow the proteolytic attack of an AAA protease that facilitates domain unfolding at the opposite side. Our results provide a rationale for the membrane arrangement of AAA proteases in mitochondria and demonstrate that degradation of membrane proteins by AAA proteases involves an active extraction of transmembrane segments and transport of solvent-exposed domains across the membrane.     

A novel view on the architecture of the non-catalytic N-terminal region of ATP-dependent LonA proteases

ATP-Dependent Lon-proteases are components of the protein quality control system, which maintains cellular proteome. The Lon family consists of two subfamilies A and B, differing in subunit architecture and intracellular location. We propose here a reinterpretation of the domain organization of the non-catalytic N-terminal region of LonA proteases. Using Escherichia coli LonA protease (EcLon) as an example, it has been shown that a fragment (αN domain) located between the N-terminal domain and the AAA⁺ module is similar to the α1 domain of the first AAA⁺ module of chaperone-disaggregase ClpB. A coiled-coil (CC) region included in the αN domain of LonA is similar to the M domain of ClpB chaperones, which is inserted into the α1 domain. This region is suggested to adopt the structure similar to the propeller-like (PL) domain. The typical architecture of the N-terminal region of LonA proteases is postulated to be characterized by the obligatory presence of a PL domain, included in the αN domain, but may vary in the length and topology of the preceding N-terminal domain, which can have in some cases a more complex structure than in EcLon.     

Protein unfolding and degradation by the AAA+ Lon protease

AAA+ proteases employ a hexameric ring that harnesses the energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis to unfold native substrates and translocate the unfolded polypeptide into an interior compartment for degradation. What determines the ability of different AAA+ enzymes to unfold and thus degrade different native protein substrates is currently uncertain. Here, we explore the ability of the E. coli Lon protease to unfold and degrade model protein substrates beginning at N-terminal, C-terminal, or internal degrons. Lon has historically been viewed as a weak unfoldase, but we demonstrate robust and processive unfolding/degradation of some substrates with very stable protein domains, including mDHFR and titin(I27) . For some native substrates, Lon is a more active unfoldase than related AAA+ proteases, including ClpXP and ClpAP. For other substrates, this relationship is reversed. Thus, unfolding activity does not appear to be an intrinsic enzymatic property. Instead, it depends on the specific protease and substrate, suggesting that evolution has diversified rather than optimized the protein unfolding activities of different AAA+ proteases.     

Protein aggregation in Escherichia coli: role of proteases

Protein aggregation is involved in several human diseases, and presumed to be an important process in protein quality control. In bacteria, aggregation of proteins occurs during stress conditions, such as heat shock. We studied the protein aggregates of Escherichia coli during heat shock. Our results demonstrate that the concentration and diversity of proteins in the aggregates depend on the availability of proteases. Aggregates obtained from mutants in the Lon (La) protease contain three times more protein than wild-type aggregates and show the broadest protein diversity. The results support the assumption that protein aggregates are formed from partially unfolded proteins that were not refolded by chaperones or degraded by proteases.     

Forms of LonB protease from Archaeoglobus fulgidus devoid of the transmembrane domain: The contribution of the quaternary structure to the regulation of enzyme proteolytic activity

Deletion of the transmembrane domain (TM-domain) of Archaeoglobus fulgidus LonB protease (Archaeoglobus fulgidus (AfLon)) was shown to result in uncontrollable activation of the enzyme proteolytic site and in vivo autolysis yielding a stable and functionally inactive fragment consisting of both α-helical and proteolytic domains (αP). The ΔTM-AfLon-S509A enzyme form, obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of the catalytic Ser residue, is capable of recombination with the αP fragment. The mixed oligomers were shown to be proteolytically active, which indicates a crucial role of subunit interactions in the activation of the AfLon proteolytic site. The thermophilic nature of AfLon protease was found to be due to the special features of the enzyme activity regulation, the structure of ATPase domain, and the quaternary structure.     

Unique structural organization of ATP-dependent LonA proteases

Homooligomeric LonA proteases are the key components of the protein quality control system in bacteria and eukaryotes. Domain organization of the common pool of LonA proteases is determined by the comparative analysis of primary and secondary structures of a number of bacterial and eukaryotic enzymes. The similarity of individual enzyme domains was estimated, domain-domain linker areas were revealed, and regions that are capable of including intercalated peptide fragments were identified. LonA proteases were shown to be unique AAA⁺ proteins, because in addition to the classic AAA⁺ module they contain a part of another AAA⁺ module, namely the α-helical domain including a coiled-coil region, which is similar to the α-helical domain of the AAA⁺-1 module of the chaperone-disagregases ClpB/Hsp104.     

Effects of inorganic polyphosphate on the proteolytic and DNA-binding activities of Lon in Escherichia coli

Lon belongs to a unique group of proteases that bind to DNA and is involved in the regulation of several important cellular functions, including adaptation to nutritional downshift. Previously, we revealed that inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) increases in Escherichia coli in response to amino acid starvation and that it stimulates the degradation of free ribosomal proteins by Lon. In this work, we examined the effects of polyP on the proteolytic and DNA-binding activities of Lon. An order-of-addition experiment suggested that polyP first binds to Lon, which stimulates Lon-mediated degradation of ribosomal proteins. A polyP-binding assay using Lon deletion mutants showed that the polyP-binding site of Lon is localized in the ATPase domain. Because the same ATPase domain also contains the DNA-binding site, polyP can compete with DNA for binding to Lon. In fact, an equimolar amount of polyP almost completely inhibited DNA-Lon complex formation, suggesting that Lon binds to polyP with a higher affinity than it binds to DNA. Collectively, our results showed that polyP may control the cellular activity of Lon not only as a protease but also as a DNA-binding protein.     

Substrate recognition by AAA+ ATPases: distinct substrate binding modes in ATP-dependent protease Yme1 of the mitochondrial intermembrane space

The energy-dependent proteolysis of cellular proteins is mediated by conserved proteolytic AAA(+) complexes. Two such machines, the m- and i-AAA proteases, are present in the mitochondrial inner membrane. They exert chaperone-like properties and specifically degrade nonnative membrane proteins. However, molecular mechanisms of substrate engagement by AAA proteases remained elusive. Here, we define initial steps of substrate recognition and identify two distinct substrate binding sites in the i-AAA protease subunit Yme1. Misfolded polypeptides are recognized by conserved helices in proteolytic and AAA domains. Structural modeling reveals a lattice-like arrangement of these helices at the surface of hexameric AAA protease ring complexes. While helices within the AAA domain apparently play a general role for substrate binding, the requirement for binding to surface-exposed helices within the proteolytic domain is determined by the folding and membrane association of substrates. Moreover, an assembly factor of cytochrome c oxidase, Cox20, serves as a substrate-specific cofactor during proteolysis and modulates the initial interaction of nonassembled Cox2 with the protease. Our findings therefore reveal the existence of alternative substrate recognition pathways within AAA proteases and shed new light on molecular mechanisms ensuring the specificity of proteolysis by energy-dependent proteases.     

Impaired protein quality control system underlies mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Hyperglycaemia-related mitochondrial impairment is suggested as a contributor to skeletal muscle dysfunction. Aiming a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie mitochondrial dysfunction in type 1 diabetic skeletal muscle, the role of the protein quality control system in mitochondria functionality was studied in intermyofibrillar mitochondria that were isolated from gastrocnemius muscle of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. Hyperglycaemic rats showed more mitochondria but with lower ATP production ability, which was related with increased carbonylated protein levels and lower mitochondrial proteolytic activity assessed by zymography. LC-MS/MS analysis of the zymogram bands with proteolytic activity allowed the identification of an AAA protease, Lon protease; the metalloproteases PreP, LAP-3 and MIP; and cathepsin D. The content and activity of the Lon protease was lower in the STZ animals, as well as the expression of the m-AAA protease paraplegin, evaluated by western blotting. Data indicated that in muscle from diabetic rats the mitochondrial protein quality control system was compromised, which was evidenced by the decreased activity of AAA proteases, and was accompanied by the accumulation of oxidatively modified proteins, thereby causing adverse effects on mitochondrial functionality.     

Roles of the N domain of the AAA+ Lon protease in substrate recognition,allosteric regulation and chaperone activity

Degron binding regulates the activities of the AAA+ Lon protease in addition to targeting proteins for degradation. The sul20 degron from the cell‐division inhibitor SulA is shown here to bind to the N domain of Escherichia coli Lon, and the recognition site is identified by cross‐linking and scanning for mutations that prevent sul20‐peptide binding. These N‐domain mutations limit the rates of proteolysis of model sul20‐tagged substrates and ATP hydrolysis by an allosteric mechanism. Lon inactivation of SulA in vivo requires binding to the N domain and robust ATP hydrolysis but does not require degradation or translocation into the proteolytic chamber. Lon‐mediated relief of proteotoxic stress and protein aggregation in vivo can also occur without degradation but is not dependent on robust ATP hydrolysis. In combination, these results demonstrate that Lon can function as a protease or a chaperone and reveal that some of its ATP‐dependent biological activities do not require translocation.