The GDI-like solubilizing factor PDEδ sustains the spatial organization and signalling of Ras family proteins

We identify a role for the GDI-like solubilizing factor (GSF) PDEδ in modulating signalling through Ras family G proteins by sustaining their dynamic distribution in cellular membranes. We show that the GDI-like pocket of PDEδ binds and solubilizes farnesylated Ras proteins, thereby enhancing their diffusion in the cytoplasm. This mechanism allows more effective trapping of depalmitoylated Ras proteins at the Golgi and polycationic Ras proteins at the plasma membrane to counter the entropic tendency to distribute these proteins over all intracellular membranes. Thus, PDEδ activity augments K/Hras signalling by enriching Ras at the plasma membrane; conversely, PDEδ down-modulation randomizes Ras distributions to all membranes in the cell and suppresses regulated signalling through wild-type Ras and also constitutive oncogenic Ras signalling in cancer cells. Our findings link the activity of PDEδ in determining Ras protein topography to Ras-dependent signalling.     

RalGDS family members couple Ras to Ral signalling and that's not all

Ras proteins function as molecular switches that are activated in response to signalling pathways initiated by various extracellular stimuli and subsequently bind to numerous effector proteins leading to the activation of several signalling cascades within the cell. Ras and Ras-related proteins belong to a large superfamily of small GTPases characterized by significant sequence and function similarities. Several evidence indicate the existence of complex signalling networks that link Ras with its relatives in the family. A key role in this cross-talk is played by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that serve both as regulators and as effectors of Ras family proteins. The members of the RalGDS family, RalGDS, RGL, RGL2/Rlf and RGL3, can interact with activated Ras through their Ras Binding Domain (RBD), but may function as effectors for other Ras family members. They possess a REM-CDC25 homology region like RasGEFs, but specifically activate only RalA and RalB and not Ras or other Ras-related small GTPases. In this review we provide an update on this recently discovered family of GEFs, highlighting their crucial role in coupling activated Ras to activation of Ral, thus regulating several fundamental cell processes, and also discussing some evidence supporting Ras-independent additional functions of RalGDS proteins.     

Thematic review series: lipid posttranslational modifications. CAAX modification and membrane targeting of Ras

Proteins that terminate with a consensus sequence known as CAAX undergo a series of posttranslational modifications that include polyisoprenylation, endoproteolysis, and carboxyl methylation. These modifications render otherwise hydrophilic proteins hydrophobic at their C termini such that they associate with membranes. Whereas prenylation occurs in the cytosol, postprenylation processing is accomplished on the cytoplasmic surface of the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. Among the numerous CAAX proteins encoded in mammalian genomes are many signaling molecules such as monomeric GTPases, including the Ras proteins that play an important role in cancer. In the course of their processing, nascent Ras proteins traffic from their site of synthesis in the cytosol to the endomembrane and then out to the plasma membrane (PM) by at least two pathways. Recently, retrograde pathways have been discovered that deliver mature Ras from the PM back to the Golgi. The Golgi has been identified as a platform upon which Ras can signal. Thus, the subcellular trafficking of Ras proteins has the potential to increase the complexity of Ras signaling by adding a spatial dimension. The complexity of Ras trafficking also affords a wider array of potential targets for the discovery of drugs that might inhibit tumors by interfering with Ras trafficking.     

The Ras branch of small GTPases: Ras family members don't fall far from the tree

The Ras branch of the Ras superfamily consists of small GTPases most closely related to Ras and include the R-Ras, Rap, Ral, Rheb, Rin and Rit proteins. Although our understanding of Ras signaling and biology is now considerable, recent observations suggest that Ras function is more complex than previously believed. First, the three Ras proteins may not be functionally identical. Second, Ras function involves functional cross-talk with their close relatives.     

Determinants of Ras proteins specifying the sensitivity to yeast Ira2p and human p120-GAP.

Human and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras proteins and their regulators GAP (GTPase activating protein)and GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factor) display structural similarities and are functionally interchangeable in vivo and in vitro, indicating that the molecular mechanism regulating Ras proteins has been conserved during evolution. As the only exceptions, the two S.cerevisiae GAPs, Ira1p and Ira2p, are strictly specific for yeast Ras proteins and cannot stimulate the GTPase of mammalian Ras. This study searches for the reasons for the different sensitivity to Ira2p of human H-ras p21 and yeast Ras2p. Construction of H-ras/Ras2p chimaeras showed that Gly18 of Ras2p (Ala11 of H-ras p21) is an important determinant for the specificity of Ira2p, revealing for the first time a function for this position. A second even more crucial determinant was found to be the 89-102 region of Ras2p (82-95 of H-ras p21) including the distal part of strand beta4, loop L6 and the proximal part of helix alpha3. It was possible to construct Ras2p's resistant to Ira2p but still sensitive to human p120-GAP and, conversely, a H-ras p21 sensitive to Ira2p. This work helps clarify specific aspects of the conserved molecular mechanism of interaction between Ras proteins and their negative GAP regulators.     

Differential modification of Ras proteins by ubiquitination

Ras proteins are essential components of signal transduction pathways that control cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. It is well recognized that the functional versatility of Ras proteins is accomplished through their differential compartmentalization, but the mechanisms that control their spatial segregation are not fully understood. Here we show that HRas is subject to ubiquitin conjugation, whereas KRas is refractory to this modification. The membrane-anchoring domain of HRas is necessary and sufficient to direct the mono- and diubiquitination of HRas. Ubiquitin attachment to HRas stabilizes its association with endosomes and modulates its ability to activate the Raf/MAPK signaling pathway. Therefore, differential ubiquitination of Ras proteins may control their location-specific signaling activities.     

ADP-ribosylation of oncogenic Ras proteins by Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S in vivo

The exoenzyme S (ExoS)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, 388, and corresponding ExoS knock-out strain, 388Δ exoS , were used in a bacterial and mammalian co-culture system as a model for the contact-dependent delivery of ExoS into host cells. Examination of DNA synthesis and Ras ADP-ribosylation in tumour cell lines expressing normal and mutant Ras revealed a decrease in DNA synthesis concomitant with ADP-ribosylation of Ras proteins after exposure to ExoS-producing bacteria, but not after exposure to non-ExoS-producing bacteria. Examination of normal H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras by two-dimensional electrophoresis after exposure to bacteria revealed differences in the degree of ADP-ribosylation by ExoS, with H-Ras being modified most extensively. ADP-ribosylation of oncogenic forms of Ras was examined in vivo using cancer lines expressing mutant forms of H-, N- or K-Ras. The mutant Ras proteins were modified in a manner qualitatively similar to their normal counterparts. Using Ras/Raf-1 co-immunoprecipitation after co-culture, it was found that exposure to ExoS-producing bacteria caused a decrease in the amount of Raf-1 associated with EGF-activated Ras and oncogenic Ras. The results from this study indicate that ExoS ADP-ribosylates both normal and mutant Ras proteins in vivo and inhibits signalling through Ras.     

Genetic analysis of Ras signalling pathways in cell proliferation,migration and survival

We have used mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) devoid of Ras proteins to illustrate that they are essential for proliferation and migration, but not for survival, at least in these cells. These properties are unique to the Ras subfamily of proteins because ectopic expression of other Ras‐like small GTPases, even when constitutively active, could not compensate for the absence of Ras proteins. Only constitutive activation of components of the Raf/Mek/Erk pathway was sufficient to sustain normal proliferation and migration of MEFs devoid of Ras proteins. Activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K)/PTEN/Akt and Ral guanine exchange factor (RalGEF)/Ral pathways, either alone or in combination, failed to induce proliferation or migration of Rasless cells, although they cooperated with Raf/Mek/Erk signalling to reproduce the full response mediated by Ras signalling. In contrast to current hypotheses, Ras signalling did not induce proliferation by inducing expression of D‐type Cyclins. Rasless MEFs had normal levels of Cyclin D1/Cdk4 and Cyclin E/Cdk2. However, these complexes were inactive. Inactivation of the pocket proteins or knock down of pRb relieved MEFs from their dependence on Ras signalling to proliferate.     

The delta subunit of retinal rod cGMP phosphodiesterase regulates the membrane association of Ras and Rap GTPases.

Post-translational modifications of GTPases from the Ras superfamily enable them to associate with membrane compartments where they exert their biological activities. However, no protein acting like Rho and Rab dissociation inhibitor (GDI) that regulate the membrane association of Rho and Rab GTPases has been described for Ras and closely related proteins. We report here that the delta subunit of retinal rod phosphodiesterase (PDEdelta) is able to interact with prenylated Ras and Rap proteins, and to solubilize them from membranes, independently of their nucleotide-bound (GDP or GTP) state. We show that PDEdelta exhibits striking structural similarities with RhoGDI, namely conservation of the Ig-like fold and presence of a series of hydrophobic residues which could act as in RhoGDI to sequester the prenyl group of its target proteins, thereby providing structural support for the biochemical activity of PDEdelta. We observe that the overexpression of PDEdelta interferes with Ras trafficking and propose that it may play a role in the process that delivers prenylated proteins from endomembranes, once they have undergone proteolysis and carboxymethylation, to the structures that ensure trafficking to their respective resident compartments.     

Nuclear transport of Ras-associated tumor suppressor proteins: different transport receptor binding specificities for arginine-rich nuclear targeting signals

Ras proteins regulate a wide range of biological processes by interacting with a variety of effector proteins. In addition to the known role in tumorigensis, the activated form of Ras exhibits growth-inhibitory effects by unknown mechanisms. Several Ras effector proteins identified as mediators of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest also exhibit properties normally associated with tumor suppressor proteins. Here, we show that Ras effector RASSF5/NORE-1 binds strongly to K-Ras but weakly to both N-Ras and H-Ras. RASSF5 was found to localize both in the nucleus and the nucleolus in contrast to other Ras effector proteins, RASSF1C and RASSF2, which are localized in the nucleus and excluded from nucleolus. A 50 amino acid residue transferable arginine-rich nucleolar localization signal (NoLS) identified in RASSF5 is capable of interacting with importin-beta and transporting the cargo into the nucleolus. Surprisingly, similar arginine-rich signals identified in RASSF1C and RASSF2 interact with importin-alpha and transport the heterologous cytoplasmic proteins to the nucleus. Interestingly, mutation of arginine residues within these nuclear targeting signals prevented interaction of Ras effector proteins with respective transport receptors and abolished their nuclear translocation. These results provide evidence for the first time that arginine-rich signals are able to recognize different nuclear import receptors and transport the RASSF proteins into distinct sub-cellular compartments. In addition, our data suggest that the nuclear localization of RASSF5 is critical for its cell growth control activity. Together, these data suggest that the transport of Ras effector superfamily proteins into the nucleus/nucleolus may play a vital role in modulating Ras-mediated cell proliferation during tumorigenesis.     

Ras proteins control mitochondrial biogenesis and function in<Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</Emphasis>

The evolutionarily conserved Ras proteins function as a point of convergence for different signaling pathways in eukaryotes and have been implicated in both aging and cancer development. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the plasma membrane proteins Ras1 and Ras2 are sensing the nutritional status of the environments, e.g., the abundance and quality of available carbon sources. The cAMP-protein kinase A pathway is the most explored signaling pathway controlled by Ras proteins; it affects a large number of genes, some of which are important to defend the cell against oxidative stress. In addition, recent analysis has shown that the Ras system of yeast is involved in the development of mitochondria and in regulating their activity. As a sensor of environmental status and an effector of mitochondrial activity, Ras serves as a Rosetta stone of cellular energy transduction. This review summarizes the physical and functional involvement of Ras proteins and Ras-dependent signaling pathways in mitochondrial function in S. cerevisiae. Since mitochondria produce harmful reactive oxygen species as an inevitable byproduct and are partly under control of Ras, illuminating these regulatory interactions may improve our understanding of both cancer and aging.     

The residues of Ras and Rap proteins that determine their GAP specificities.

The oncogenic transformation of a normal fibroblast by mutated Ras genes can be reversed by overexpression of a Ras-related gene called Rap1A (or Krev1). Both Ras and Rap1A proteins are G proteins and appear to serve as signal transducers only in the GTP-bound form. Therefore, GAP1 and GAP3, which stimulate the intrinsic GTPase activities of normal Ras and Rap1A proteins, respectively, serve as attenuators of their signal transducing activities. In this paper, we describe the enzymatic properties of several mutated Rap1A and chimeric Ras/Rap1A (or -1B) proteins which lead to the following conclusions: (i) the GAP3-dependent activation of both Rap1A and -1B GTPases requires Gly12, but neither Thr61 nor Gln63; (ii) residues 64 to 70 of the Rap1 GTPases are sufficient to determine their specificities for GAP3; and (iii) residues 61 to 65 of the Ras GTPases are sufficient for determining their specificities for GAP1. Thus, the domains of the Ras or Rap1 proteins that determine whether their signals are attenuated by GAP1 or GAP3 are distinct from the N-terminal domain (residues 21 to 54) that determines whether their signals are oncogenic or antioncogenic. The Arg12 mutant of chimeric HaRas(1-54)/Rap1A(55-184) protein has been previously reported to be oncogenic (Zhang, K., Noda, M., Vass, W. C., Papageorge, A.G., and Lowy, D.R. (1990) Science 249, 162-165). In this paper, we show that the Val12 mutant of chimeric HaRas(1-54)/Rap1B(55-184) protein is also oncogenic, suggesting that the C-terminal geranylgeranylation of the Rap 1B protein can replace functionally the C-terminal farnesylation of the Ras protein to allow the G protein to be oncogenic.     

Interactions of Ras proteins with the plasma membrane and their roles in signaling

The complex dynamic structure of the plasma membrane plays critical roles in cellular signaling; interactions with the membrane lipid milieu, spatial segregation within and between cellular membranes and/or targeting to specific membrane-associated scaffolds are intimately involved in many signal transduction pathways. In this review, we focus on the membrane interactions of Ras proteins. These small GTPases play central roles in the regulation of cell growth and proliferation, and their excessive activation is commonly encountered in human tumors. Ras proteins associate with the membrane continuously via C-terminal lipidation and additional interactions in both their inactive and active forms; this association, as well as the targeting of specific Ras isoforms to plasma membrane microdomains and to intracellular organelles, have recently been implicated in Ras signaling and oncogenic potential. We discuss biochemical and biophysical evidence for the roles of specific domains of Ras proteins in mediating their association with the plasma membrane, and consider the potential effects of lateral segregation and interactions with membrane-associated protein assemblies on the signaling outcomes.     

Evolutionary expansion of the Ras switch regulatory module in eukaryotes

Ras proteins control many aspects of eukaryotic cell homeostasis by switching between active (GTP-bound) and inactive (GDP-bound) conformations, a reaction catalyzed by GTPase exchange factors (GEF) and GTPase activating proteins (GAP) regulators, respectively. Here, we show that the complexity, measured as number of genes, of the canonical Ras switch genetic system (including Ras, RasGEF, RasGAP and RapGAP families) from 24 eukaryotic organisms is correlated with their genome size and is inversely correlated to their evolutionary distances from humans. Moreover, different gene subfamilies within the Ras switch have contributed unevenly to the module's expansion and speciation processes during eukaryote evolution. The Ras system remarkably reduced its genetic expansion after the split of the Euteleostomi clade and presently looks practically crystallized in mammals. Supporting evidence points to gene duplication as the predominant mechanism generating functional diversity in the Ras system, stressing the leading role of gene duplication in the Ras family expansion. Domain fusion and alternative splicing are significant sources of functional diversity in the GAP and GEF families but their contribution is limited in the Ras family. An evolutionary model of the Ras system expansion is proposed suggesting an inherent 'decision making' topology with the GEF input signal integrated by a homologous molecular mechanism and bifurcation in GAP signaling propagation.     

The role of G-domain orientation and nucleotide state on the Ras isoform-specific membrane interaction

Ras proteins are proto-oncogenes that function as molecular switches linking extracellular stimuli with an overlapping but distinctive range of biological outcomes. Although modulatable interactions between the membrane and the Ras C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR) harbouring the membrane anchor motifs enable signalling specificity to be determined by their location, it is becoming clear that the spatial orientation of different Ras proteins is also crucial for their functions. To reveal the orientation of the G-domain at membranes, we conducted an extensive study on different Ras isoforms anchored to model raft membranes. The results show that the G-domain mediates the Ras–membrane interaction by inducing different sets of preferred orientations in the active and inactive states with largely parallel orientation relative to the membrane of most of the helices. The distinct locations of the different isoforms, exposing them to different effectors and regulators, coupled with different G-domain-membrane orientation, suggests synergy between this type of recognition motif and the specificity conferred by the HVR, thereby validating the concept of isoform specificity in Ras.     

Oncogenic Ras in tumour progression and metastasis

The ras genes give rise to a family of related GTP-binding proteins that exhibit potent transforming potential. Mutational activation of Ras proteins promotes oncogenesis by disturbing a multitude of cellular processes, such as gene expression, cell cycle progression and cell proliferation, as well as cell survival, and cell migration. Ras signalling pathways are well known for their involvement in tumour initiation, but less is known about their contribution to invasion and metastasis. This review summarises the role and mechanisms of Ras signalling, especially the role of the Ras effector cascade Raf/MEK/ERK, as well as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in Ras-mediated transformation and tumour progression. In addition, it discusses the impact of Rho GTPases on Ras-mediated transformation and metastasis.     

Spatiotemporal Organization of Ras Signaling: Rasosomes and the Galectin Switch

Summary 1. Ras signaling and oncogenesis depend on the dynamic interplay of Ras with distinctive plasma membrane (PM) microdomains and various intracellular compartments. Such interaction is dictated by individual elements in the carboxy-terminal domain of the Ras proteins, including a farnesyl isoprenoid group, sequences in the hypervariable region (hvr)-linker, and palmitoyl groups in H/N-Ras isoforms.2. The farnesyl group acts as a specific recognition unit that interacts with prenyl-binding pockets in galectin-1 (Gal-1), galectin-3 (Gal-3), and cGMP phosphodiesterase δ. This interaction appears to contribute to the prolongation of Ras signals in the PM, the determination of Ras effector usage, and perhaps also the transport of cytoplasmic Ras. Gal-1 promotes H-Ras signaling to Raf at the expense of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K) and Ral guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RalGEF), while galectin-3 promotes K-Ras signaling to both Raf and PI3-K.3. The hvr-linker and the palmitates of H-Ras and N-Ras determine the micro- and macro-localizations of these proteins in the PM and in the Golgi, as well as in ‘rasosomes’, randomly moving nanoparticles that carry palmitoylated Ras proteins and their signal through the cytoplasm.4. The dynamic compartmentalization of Ras proteins contributes to the spatial organization of Ras signaling, promotes redistribution of Ras, and provides an additional level of selectivity to the signal output of this regulatory GTPase.     

Rasosomes originate from the Golgi to dispense Ras signals

Ras proteins undergo an incompletely understood trafficking process in the cell. Rasosomes are protein nanoparticles of 80–100 nm diameter that carry lipidated Ras isoforms (H-Ras and N-Ras) as well as their effectors through the cytoplasm and near the plasma membrane (PM). In this study, we identified the subcellular origin of rasosomes and how they spread Ras proteins through the cell. We found no dependency of rasosome formation on galectins, or on the GDP-/GTP-bound state of Ras. We found that significantly more rasosomes are associated with forms of Ras that are localized to the Golgi, namely N-Ras or the singly palmitoylated H-Ras mutant (C181S). To explore the possibility that rasosome originate from the Golgi, we used photoactivatable (PA)-GFP-H-Ras mutants and showed that rasosomes bud from the Golgi in a two-step mechanism. Newly released rasosomes first move in an energy-dependent directed fashion and then convert to randomly diffusing rasosomes. Dual fluorescence time-lapse imaging revealed the appearance of dually labeled rasosomes, indicating a dynamic exchange of cytoplasmic and PM-associated Ras with rasosome-associated Ras. Finally, higher levels of rasosomes correlate with higher levels of ERK phosphorylation, a key marker of Ras downstream signaling. We suggest that H-Ras and N-Ras proteins exchange with rasosomes that can function as carriers of palmitoylated Ras and its signals.     

Plasma membrane localization of Ras requires class C Vps proteins and functional mitochondria in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ras proteins are synthesized as cytosolic precursors, but then undergo posttranslational lipid addition, membrane association, and subcellular targeting to the plasma membrane. Although the enzymes responsible for farnesyl and palmitoyl lipid addition have been described, the mechanism by which these modifications contribute to the subcellular localization of Ras is not known. Following addition of the farnesyl group, Ras associates with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where palmitoylation occurs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The subsequent translocation of Ras from the ER to the plasma membrane does not require the classical secretory pathway or a functional Golgi apparatus. Vesicular and nonvesicular transport pathways for Ras proteins have been proposed, but the pathway is not known. Here we describe a genetic screen designed to identify mutants defective in Ras trafficking in S. cerevisiae. The screen implicates, for the first time, the class C VPS complex in Ras trafficking. Vps proteins are best characterized for their role in endosome and vacuole membrane fusion. However, the role of the class C Vps complex in Ras trafficking is distinct from its role in endosome and vacuole vesicle fusion, as a mitochondrial involvement was uncovered. Disruption of class C VPS genes results in mitochondrial defects and an accumulation of Ras proteins on mitochondrial membranes. Ras also fractionates with mitochondria in wild-type cells, where it is detected on the outer mitochondrial membrane by virtue of its sensitivity to protease treatment. These results point to a previously uncharacterized role of mitochondria in the subcellular trafficking of Ras proteins.