Structural and computational characterization of the SHV-1 beta-lactamase-beta-lactamase inhibitor protein interface

Beta-lactamase inhibitor protein (BLIP) binds a variety of class A beta-lactamases with affinities ranging from micromolar to picomolar. Whereas the TEM-1 and SHV-1 beta-lactamases are almost structurally identical, BLIP binds TEM-1 approximately 1000-fold tighter than SHV-1. Determining the underlying source of this affinity difference is important for understanding the molecular basis of beta-lactamase inhibition and mechanisms of protein-protein interface specificity and affinity. Here we present the 1.6A resolution crystal structure of SHV-1.BLIP. In addition, a point mutation was identified, SHV D104E, that increases SHV.BLIP binding affinity from micromolar to nanomolar. Comparison of the SHV-1.BLIP structure with the published TEM-1.BLIP structure suggests that the increased volume of Glu-104 stabilizes a key binding loop in the interface. Solution of the 1.8A SHV D104K.BLIP crystal structure identifies a novel conformation in which this binding loop is removed from the interface. Using these structural data, we evaluated the ability of EGAD, a program developed for computational protein design, to calculate changes in the stability of mutant beta-lactamase.BLIP complexes. Changes in binding affinity were calculated within an error of 1.6 kcal/mol of the experimental values for 112 mutations at the TEM-1.BLIP interface and within an error of 2.2 kcal/mol for 24 mutations at the SHV-1.BLIP interface. The reasonable success of EGAD in predicting changes in interface stability is a promising step toward understanding the stability of the beta-lactamase.BLIP complexes and computationally assisted design of tight binding BLIP variants.     

Thermodynamic investigation of the role of contact residues of beta-lactamase-inhibitory protein for binding to TEM-1 beta-lactamase

We have determined the thermodynamics of binding for the interaction between TEM-1 beta-lactamase and a set of alanine substituted contact residue mutants ofbeta-lactamase-inhibitory protein (BLIP) using isothermal titration calorimetry. The binding enthalpies for these interactions are highly temperature dependent, with negative binding heat capacity changes ranging from -800 to -271 cal mol(-1) K(-1). The isoenthalpic temperatures (at which the binding enthalpy is zero) of these interactions range from 5 to 38 degrees C. The changes in isoenthalpic temperature were used as an indicator of the changes in enthalpy and entropy driving forces, which in turn are related to hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions. A contact residue of BLIP is categorized as a canonical residue if its alanine substitution mutant exhibits a change of isoenthalpic temperature matching the change of hydrophobicity because of the mutation. A contact position exhibiting a change in isoenthalpic temperature that does not match the change in hydrophobicity is categorized as an anti-canonical residue. Our experimental results reveal that the majority of residues where alanine substitution results in a loss of affinity are canonical (7 of 10), and about half of the residues where alanine substitutions have a minor effect are canonical. The interactions between TEM-1beta-lactamase and BLIP canonical contact residues contribute directly to binding free energy, suggesting potential anchoring sites for binding partners. The anti-canonical behavior of certain residues may be the result of mutation-induced modifications such as structural rearrangements affecting contact residue configurations. Structural inspection of BLIP suggests that the Lys(74) side chain electrostatically holds BLIP loop 2 in position to bind to TEM-1 beta-lactamase, explaining a large loss of entropy-driven binding energy of the K74A mutant and the resulting anti-canonical behavior. The anti-canonical behavior of the W150A mutant may also be due to structural rearrangements. Finally, the affinity enhancing effect of the contact residue mutant Y50A may be due to energetic coupling interactions between Asp(49) and His(41).     

Design of potent beta-lactamase inhibitors by phage display of beta-lactamase inhibitory protein

Beta-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) binds tightly to several beta-lactamases including TEM-1 beta-lactamase (K(i) 0.1 nm). The TEM-1 beta-lactamase/BLIP co-crystal structure indicates that two turn regions in BLIP insert into the active site of beta-lactamase to block the binding of beta-lactam antibiotics. Residues from each turn, Asp(49) and Phe(142), mimic interactions made by penicillin G when bound in the beta-lactamase active site. Phage display was used to determine which residues within the turn regions of BLIP are critical for binding TEM-1 beta-lactamase. The sequences of a set of functional mutants from each library indicated that a few sequence types were predominant. These BLIP mutants exhibited K(i) values for beta-lactamase inhibition ranging from 0.01 to 0.2 nm. The results indicate that even though BLIP is a potent inhibitor of TEM-1 beta-lactamase, the wild-type sequence of the active site binding region is not optimal and that derivatives of BLIP that bind beta-lactamase extremely tightly can be obtained. Importantly, all of the tight binding BLIP mutants have sequences that would be predicted theoretically to form turn structures.     

Determinants of binding affinity and specificity for the interaction of TEM-1 and SME-1 beta-lactamase with beta-lactamase inhibitory protein

The hydrolysis of beta-lactam antibiotics by class A beta-lactamases is a common cause of bacterial resistance to these agents. The beta-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) is able to bind and inhibit several class A beta-lactamases, including TEM-1 beta-lactamase and SME-1 beta-lactamase. Although the TEM-1 and SME-1 enzymes share 33% amino acid sequence identity and a similar fold, they differ substantially in surface electrostatic properties and the conformation of a loop-helix region that BLIP binds. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis was performed to identify the residues on BLIP that contribute to its binding affinity for each of these enzymes. The results indicate that the sequence requirements for binding are similar for both enzymes with most of the binding free energy provided by two patches of aromatic residues on the surface of BLIP. Polar residues such as several serines in the interface do not make significant contributions to affinity for either enzyme. In addition, the specificity of binding is significantly altered by mutation of two charged residues, Glu73 and Lys74, that are buried in the structure of the TEM-1.BLIP complex as well as by residues located on two loops that insert into the active site pocket. Based on the results, a E73A/Y50A double mutant was constructed that exhibited a 220,000-fold change in binding specificity for the TEM-1 versus SME-1 enzymes.     

Dissecting the protein-protein interface between beta-lactamase inhibitory protein and class A beta-lactamases

beta-Lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) binds and inhibits a diverse collection of class A beta-lactamases at a wide range of affinities. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis was previously performed to identify the amino acid sequence requirements of BLIP for inhibiting TEM-1 beta-lactamase and SME-1 beta-lactamase. Two hotspots of binding energy, one from each domain of BLIP, were identified (Zhang, Z., and Palzkill, T. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 45706-45712). This study has been extended to examine the amino acid sequence requirements of BLIP for binding to the SHV-1 beta-lactamase, which is a poor binding substrate (Ki= 1.1 microm), and the Bacillus anthracis Bla1 enzyme (Ki= 2.5 nm). The two hotspots previously identified as important for binding TEM-1 and SME-1 beta-lactamase were also found to be important for binding Bla1. The hotspot from the second domain of BLIP, however, does not make substantial contributions to SHV-1 binding. This may explain why BLIP binds to SHV-1 beta-lactamase with much weaker affinity than to the other three enzymes. Three regions, including two loops that insert into the active pocket of TEM-1 beta-lactamase and the Glu-73-Lys-74 buried charge motif, exhibit strikingly different effects on the binding affinity of BLIP toward the various enzymes when mutated and, therefore, act as specificity determinants. Analysis of double mutants of BLIP that combine specificity-determining residues suggests that these residues contribute to the poor affinity between the second domain of BLIP and SHV-1 beta-lactamase.     

Binding hot spots in the TEM1-BLIP interface in light of its modular architecture

Proteins bind one another in aqua's solution to form tight and specific complexes. Previously we have shown that this is achieved through the modular architecture of the interaction network formed by the interface residues, where tight cooperative interactions are found within modules but not between them. Here we extend this study to cover the entire interface of TEM1 beta-lactamase and its protein inhibitor BLIP using an improved method for deriving interaction maps based on REDUCE to add hydrogen atoms and then by evaluating the interactions using modifications of the programs PROBE, NCI and PARE. An extensive mutagenesis study of the interface residues indeed showed that each module is energetically independent on other modules, and that cooperativity is found only within a module. By solving the X-ray structure of two interface mutations affecting two different modules, we demonstrated that protein-protein binding occur via the structural reorganization of the binding modules, either by a "lock and key" or an induced fit mechanism. To explain the cooperativity within a module, we performed multiple-mutant cycle analysis of cluster 2 resulting in a high-resolution energy map of this module. Mutant studies are usually done in reference to alanine, which can be regarded as a deletion of a side-chain. However, from a biological perspective, there is a major interest to understand non-Ala substitutions, as they are most common. Using X-ray crystallography and multiple-mutant cycle analysis we demonstrated the added complexity in understanding non-Ala mutations. Here, a double mutation replacing the wild-type Glu,Tyr to Tyr,Asn on TEM1 (res id 104,105) caused a major backbone structural rearrangement of BLIP, changing the composition of two modules but not of other modules within the interface. This shows the robustness of the modular approach, yet demonstrates the complexity of in silico protein design.     

Protein minimization by random fragmentation and selection

Protein-protein interactions are involved in most biological processes and are important targets for drug design. Over the past decade, there has been increased interest in the design of small molecules that mimic functional epitopes of protein inhibitors. BLIP is a 165 amino acid protein that is a potent inhibitor of TEM-1 beta-lactamase (K(i) = 0.1 nM). To aid in the development of new inhibitors of beta-lactamase, the gene encoding BLIP was randomly fragmented and DNA segments encoding peptides that retain the ability to bind TEM-1 beta-lactamase were isolated using phage display. The selected peptides revealed a common, overlapping region that includes BLIP residues C30-D49. Synthesis and binding analysis of the C30-D49 peptide indicate that this peptide inhibits TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Therefore, a peptide derivative of BLIP that has been reduced in size by 88% compared with wild-type BLIP retains the ability to bind and inhibit beta-lactamase.     

Specificity and cooperativity at β-lactamase position 104 in TEM-1/BLIP and SHV-1/BLIP interactions

Establishing a quantitative understanding of the determinants of affinity in protein–protein interactions remains challenging. For example, TEM‐1/β‐lactamase inhibitor protein (BLIP) and SHV‐1/BLIP are homologous β‐lactamase/β‐lactamase inhibitor protein complexes with disparate K_d values (3 nM and 2 μM, respectively), and a single substitution, D104E in SHV‐1, results in a 1000‐fold enhancement in binding affinity. In TEM‐1, E104 participates in a salt bridge with BLIP K74, whereas the corresponding SHV‐1 D104 does not in the wild type SHV‐1/BLIP co‐structure. Here, we present a 1.6 Å crystal structure of the SHV‐1 D104E/BLIP complex that demonstrates that this point mutation restores this salt bridge. Additionally, mutation of a neighboring residue, BLIP E73M, results in salt bridge formation between SHV‐1 D104 and BLIP K74 and a 400‐fold increase in binding affinity. To understand how this salt bridge contributes to complex affinity, the cooperativity between the E/K or D/K salt bridge pair and a neighboring hot spot residue (BLIP F142) was investigated using double mutant cycle analyses in the background of the E73M mutation. We find that BLIP F142 cooperatively stabilizes both interactions, illustrating how a single mutation at a hot spot position can drive large perturbations in interface stability and specificity through a cooperative interaction network. Proteins 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Insights into Positive and Negative Requirements for Protein-Protein Interactions by Crystallographic Analysis of the β-Lactamase Inhibitory Proteins BLIP, BLIP-I, and BLP

β-Lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) binds a variety of β-lactamase enzymes with wide-ranging specificity. Its binding mechanism and interface interactions are a well-established model system for the characterization of protein-protein interactions. Published studies have examined the binding of BLIP to diverse target β-lactamases (e.g., TEM-1, SME-1, and SHV-1). However, apart from point mutations of amino acid residues, variability on the inhibitor side of this enzyme-inhibitor interface has remained unexplored. Thus, we present crystal structures of two likely BLIP relatives: (1) BLIP-I (solved alone and in complex with TEM-1), which has β-lactamase inhibitory activity very similar to that of BLIP; and (2) β-lactamase-inhibitory-protein-like protein (BLP) (in two apo forms, including an ultra-high-resolution structure), which is unable to inhibit any tested β-lactamase. Despite categorical differences in species of origin and function, BLIP-I and BLP share nearly identical backbone conformations, even at loop regions differing in BLIP.We describe interacting residues and provide a comparative structural analysis of the interactions formed at the interface of BLIP-I·TEM-1 versus those formed at the interface of BLIP·TEM-1. Along with initial attempts to functionally characterize BLP, we examine its amino acid residues that structurally correspond to BLIP/BLIP-I binding hotspots to explain its inability to bind and inhibit TEM-1. We conclude that the BLIP family fold is a robust and flexible scaffold that permits the formation of high-affinity protein-protein interactions while remaining highly selective. Comparison of the two naturally occurring, distinct binding interfaces built upon this scaffold (BLIP and BLIP-I) shows that there is substantial variation possible in the subnanomolar binding interaction with TEM-1. The corresponding (non-TEM-1-binding) BLP surface shows that numerous favorable backbone-backbone/backbone-side-chain interactions with a protein partner can be negated by the presence of a few, strongly unfavorable interactions, especially electrostatic repulsions.     

Structural insight into the kinetics and DeltaCp of interactions between TEM-1 beta-lactamase and beta-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP)

In a previous study, we examined thermodynamic parameters for 20 alanine mutants in beta-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) for binding to TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Here we have determined the structures of two thermodynamically distinctive complexes of BLIP mutants with TEM-1 beta-lactamase. The complex BLIP Y51A-TEM-1 is a tight binding complex with the most negative binding heat capacity change (DeltaG = approximately -13 kcal mol(-1) and DeltaCp = approximately -0.8 kcal mol(-1) K(-1)) among all of the mutants, whereas BLIP W150A-TEM-1 is a weak complex with one of the least negative binding heat capacity changes (DeltaG = approximately -8.5 kcal mol(-1) and DeltaCp = approximately -0.27 kcal mol(-1) K(-1)). We previously determined that BLIP Tyr51 is a canonical and Trp150 an anti-canonical TEM-1-contact residue, where canonical refers to the alanine substitution resulting in a matched change in the hydrophobicity of binding free energy. Structure determination indicates a rearrangement of the interactions between Asp49 of the W150A BLIP mutant and the catalytic pocket of TEM-1. The Asp49 of W150A moves more than 4 angstroms to form two new hydrogen bonds while losing four original hydrogen bonds. This explains the anti-canonical nature of the Trp150 to alanine substitution, and also reveals a strong long distance coupling between Trp150 and Asp49 of BLIP, because these two residues are more than 25 angstroms apart. Kinetic measurements indicate that the mutations influence the dissociation rate but not the association rate. Further analysis of the structures indicates that an increased number of interface-trapped water molecules correlate with poor interface packing in a mutant. It appears that the increase of interface-trapped water molecules is inversely correlated with negative binding heat capacity changes.     

Identification of residues in beta-lactamase critical for binding beta-lactamase inhibitory protein

beta-Lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) is a potent inhibitor of several beta-lactamases including TEM-1 beta-lactamase (Ki = 0.1 nM). The co-crystal structure of TEM-1 beta-lactamase and BLIP has been solved, revealing the contact residues involved in the interface between the enzyme and inhibitor. To determine which residues in TEM-1 beta-lactamase are critical for binding BLIP, the method of monovalent phage display was employed. Random mutants of TEM-1 beta-lactamase in the 99-114 loop-helix and 235-240 B3 beta-strand regions were displayed as fusion proteins on the surface of the M13 bacteriophage. Functional mutants were selected based on the ability to bind BLIP. After three rounds of enrichment, the sequences of a collection of functional beta-lactamase mutants revealed a consensus sequence for the binding of BLIP. Seven loop-helix residues including Asp-101, Leu-102, Val-103, Ser-106, Pro-107, Thr-109, and His-112 and three B3 beta-strand residues including Ser-235, Gly-236, and Gly-238 were found to be critical for tight binding of BLIP. In addition, the selected beta-lactamase mutants A113L/T114R and E240K were found to increase binding of BLIP by over 6- and 11-fold, respectively. Combining these substitutions resulted in 550-fold tighter binding between the enzyme and BLIP with a Ki of 0.40 pM. These results reveal that the binding between TEM-1 beta-lactamase and BLIP can be improved and that there are a large number of sequences consistent with tight binding between BLIP and beta-lactamase.     

Interdomain flexibility and interfacial integrity of β-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) modulate its binding to class A β-lactamases

β-Lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) consists of a tandem repeat of αβ domains conjugated by an interdomain loop and can effectively bind and inactivate class A β-lactamases, which are responsible for resistance of bacteria to β-lactam antibiotics. The varied ability of BLIP to bind different β-lactamases and the structural determinants for significant enhancement of BLIP variants with a point mutation are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the conformational dynamics of BLIP upon binding to three clinically prevalent class A β-lactamases (TEM1, SHV1, and PC1) with dissociation constants between subnanomolar and micromolar. Hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry revealed that the flexibility of the interdomain region was significantly suppressed upon strong binding to TEM1, but was not significantly changed upon weak binding to SHV1 or PC1. E73M and K74G mutations in the interdomain region improved binding affinity toward SHV1 and PC1, respectively, showing significantly increased flexibility of the interdomain region compared to the wild-type and favorable conformational changes upon binding. In contrast, more rigidity of the interfacial loop 135–145 was observed in these BLIP mutants in both free and bound states. Consistently, molecular dynamics simulations of BLIP exhibited drastic changes in the flexibility of the loop 135–145 in all complexes. Our results indicated for the first time that higher flexibility of the interdomain linker, as well as more rigidity of the interfacial loop 135–145, could be desirable determinants for enhancing inhibition of BLIP to class A β-lactamases. Together, these findings provide unique insights into the design of enhanced inhibitors.     

Protein�Cprotein binding affinities by pulse proteolysis: Application to TEM-1/BLIP protein complexes

Efficient methods for quantifying dissociation constants have become increasingly important for high‐throughput mutagenesis studies in the postgenomic era. However, experimentally determining binding affinity is often laborious, requires large amounts of purified protein, and utilizes specialized equipment. Recently, pulse proteolysis has been shown to be a robust and simple method to determine the dissociation constants for a protein–ligand pair based on the increase in thermodynamic stability upon ligand binding. Here, we extend this technique to determine binding affinities for a protein–protein complex involving the β‐lactamase TEM‐1 and various β‐lactamase inhibitor protein (BLIP) mutants. Interaction with BLIP results in an increase in the denaturation curve midpoint, C_m, of TEM‐1, which correlates with the rank order of binding affinities for several BLIP mutants. Hence, pulse proteolysis is a simple, effective method to assay for mutations that modulate binding affinity in protein–protein complexes. From a small set (n = 4) of TEM‐1/BLIP mutant complexes, a linear relationship between energy of stabilization (dissociation constant) and ΔC_m was observed. From this “calibration curve,” accurate dissociation constants for two additional BLIP mutants were calculated directly from proteolysis‐derived ΔC_m values. Therefore, in addition to qualitative information, armed with knowledge of the dissociation constants from the WT protein and a limited number of mutants, accurate quantitation of binding affinities can be determined for additional mutants from pulse proteolysis. Minimal sample requirements and the suitability of impure protein preparations are important advantages that make pulse proteolysis a powerful tool for high‐throughput mutagenesis binding studies.     

Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes

A protein design strategy was developed to specifically enhance the rate of association (k(on)) between a pair of proteins without affecting the rate of dissociation (k(off)). The method is based on increasing the electrostatic attraction between the proteins by incorporating charged residues in the vicinity of the binding interface. The contribution of mutations towards the rate of association was calculated using a newly developed computer algorithm, which predicted accurately the rate of association of mutant protein complexes relative to the wild type. Using this design strategy, the rate of association and the affinity between TEM1 beta-lactamase and its protein inhibitor BLIP was enhanced 250-fold, while the dissociation rate constant was unchanged. The results emphasize that long range electrostatic forces specifically alter k(on), but do not effect k(off). The design strategy presented here is applicable for increasing rates of association and affinities of protein complexes in general.     

Role of β-lactamase residues in a common interface for binding the structurally unrelated inhibitory proteins BLIP and BLIP-II

The β-lactamase inhibitory proteins (BLIPs) are a model system for examining molecular recognition in protein-protein interactions. BLIP and BLIP-II are structurally unrelated proteins that bind and inhibit TEM-1 β-lactamase. Both BLIPs share a common binding interface on TEM-1 and make contacts with many of the same TEM-1 surface residues. BLIP-II, however, binds TEM-1 over 150-fold tighter than BLIP despite the fact that it has fewer contact residues and a smaller binding interface. The role of eleven TEM-1 amino acid residues that contact both BLIP and BLIP-II was examined by alanine mutagenesis and determination of the association (k_on) and dissociation (k_off) rate constants for binding each partner. The substitutions had little impact on association rates and resulted in a wide range of dissociation rates as previously observed for substitutions on the BLIP side of the interface. The substitutions also had less effect on binding affinity for BLIP than BLIP-II. This is consistent with the high affinity and small binding interface of the TEM-1-BLIP-II complex, which predicts per residue contributions should be higher for TEM-1 binding to BLIP-II versus BLIP. Two TEM-1 residues (E104 and M129) were found to be hotspots for binding BLIP while five (L102, Y105, P107, K111, and M129) are hotspots for binding BLIP-II with only M129 as a common hotspot for both. Thus, although the same TEM-1 surface binds to both BLIP and BLIP-II, the distribution of binding energy on the surface is different for the two target proteins, that is, different binding strategies are employed.     

Computational redesign of the SHV-1 beta-lactamase/beta-lactamase inhibitor protein interface

β-lactamases are enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of β-lactam antibiotics. β-lactamase/β-lactamase inhibitor protein (BLIP) complexes are emerging as a well characterized experimental model system for studying protein-protein interactions. BLIP is a 165 amino acid protein that inhibits several class A β-lactamases with a wide range of affinities: picomolar affinity for K1; nanomolar affinity for TEM-1, SME-1, and BlaI; but only micromolar affinity for SHV-1 β-lactamase. The large differences in affinity coupled with the availability of extensive mutagenesis data and high-resolution crystal structures for the TEM-1/BLIP and SHV-1/BLIP complexes make them attractive systems for the further development of computational design methodology. We used EGAD, a physics-based computational design program, to redesign BLIP in an attempt to increase affinity for SHV-1. Characterization of several of designs and point mutants revealed that in all cases, the mutations stabilize the interface by 10- to 1000-fold relative to wild type BLIP. The calculated changes in binding affinity for the mutants were within a mean absolute error of 0.87 kcal/mol from the experimental values, and comparison of the calculated and experimental values for a set of 30 SHV-1/BLIP complexes yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.77. Structures of the two complexes with the highest affinity, SHV-1/BLIP (E73M) and SHV-1/BLIP (E73M, S130K, S146M), are presented at 1.7 Å resolution. While the predicted structures have much in common with the experimentally determined structures, they do not coincide perfectly; in particular a salt bridge between SHV-1 D104 and BLIP K74 is observed in the experimental structures, but not in the predicted design conformations. This discrepancy highlights the difficulty of modeling salt bridge interactions with a protein design algorithm that approximates side chains as discrete rotamers. Nevertheless, while local structural features of the interface were sometimes miscalculated, EGAD is globally successful in designing complexes with increased affinity.     

Isolation and characterization of a beta-lactamase-inhibitory protein from Streptomyces clavuligerus and cloning and analysis of the corresponding gene.

Culture filtrates of Streptomyces clavuligerus contain a proteinaceous beta-lactamase inhibitor (BLIP) in addition to a variety of beta-lactam compounds. BLIP was first detected by its ability to inhibit Bactopenase, a penicillinase derived from Bacillus cereus, but it has also been shown to inhibit the plasmid pUC- and chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases of Escherichia coli. BLIP showed no inhibitory effect against Enterobacter cloacae beta-lactamase, and it also showed no activity against an alternative source of B. cereus penicillinase. BLIP was purified to homogeneity, and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gave a size estimate for BLIP of 16,900 to 18,000. The interaction between purified BLIP and the E. coli(pUC) beta-lactamase was investigated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and determined to be noncovalent, with an estimated 1:1 molar stoichiometry. The BLIP gene was isolated on a 13.5-kilobase fragment of S. clavuligerus chromosomal DNA which did not overlap a 40-kilobase region of DNA known to contain genes for beta-lactam antibiotic biosynthesis. The gene encoded a mature protein with a deduced amino acid sequence of 165 residues (calculated molecular weight of 17,523) and also encoded a 36-amino-acid signal sequence. No significant sequence similarity to BLIP was found by pairwise comparisons using various protein and nucleotide sequence data banks or by hybridization experiments, and no BLIP activity was detected in the culture supernatants of other Streptomyces spp.     

Modulation of effector affinity by hinge region mutations also modulates switching activity in an engineered allosteric TEM1 beta-lactamase switch

RG13 is an engineered allosteric beta-lactamase (BLA) for which maltose is a positive effector. RG13 is a hybrid protein between TEM1 BLA and maltose-binding protein (MBP). Maltose binding to MBP is known to convert the open form of the protein to the closed form through conformational changes about the hinge region. We have constructed and genetically selected several variants of RG13 modified in the hinge region of the MBP domain and explored their effect on beta-lactam hydrolysis, maltose affinity and maltose-induced switching. Hinge mutations that increased maltose affinity the most (and thus presumably close the apo-MBP domain the most) also abrogated switching the most. We provide evidence for a model of RG13 switching in which there exists a threshold conformation between the open to closed form of the MBP domain that divides states that catalyze beta-lactam hydrolysis with different relative rates of acylation and deacylation.     

Computational Assessment of Protein–protein Binding Affinity by Reversely Engineering the Energetics in Protein Complexes

The cellular functions of proteins are maintained by forming diverse complexes. The stability of these complexes is quantified by the measurement of binding affinity, and mutations that alter the binding affinity can cause various diseases such as cancer and diabetes. As a result, accurate estimation of the binding stability and the effects of mutations on changes of binding affinity is a crucial step to understanding the biological functions of proteins and their dysfunctional consequences. It has been hypothesized that the stability of a protein complex is dependent not only on the residues at its binding interface by pairwise interactions but also on all other remaining residues that do not appear at the binding interface. Here, we computationally reconstruct the binding affinity by decomposing it into the contributions of interfacial residues and other non-interfacial residues in a protein complex. We further assume that the contributions of both interfacial and non-interfacial residues to the binding affinity depend on their local structural environments such as solvent-accessible surfaces and secondary structural types. The weights of all corresponding parameters are optimized by Monte-Carlo simulations. After cross-validation against a large-scale dataset, we show that the model not only shows a strong correlation between the absolute values of the experimental and calculated binding affinities, but can also be an effective approach to predict the relative changes of binding affinity from mutations. Moreover, we have found that the optimized weights of many parameters can capture the first-principle chemical and physical features of molecular recognition, therefore reversely engineering the energetics of protein complexes. These results suggest that our method can serve as a useful addition to current computational approaches for predicting binding affinity and understanding the molecular mechanism of protein–protein interactions.     

On the dynamic nature of the transition state for protein-protein association as determined by double-mutant cycle analysis and simulation

The process of protein-protein association starts with their random collision, which may develop into an encounter complex followed by a transition state and final complex formation. Here we aim to experimentally characterize the nature of the transition state of protein-protein association for three different protein-protein interactions; Barnase-Barstar, TEM1-BLIP and IFNalpha2-IFNAR2, and use the data to model the transition state structures. To model the transition state, we determined inter-protein distance-constraints of the activated complex by using double mutant cycles (DMC) assuming that interacting residues are spatially close. Significant DeltaDeltaG(double dagger)(int) values were obtained only between residues on Barnase and Barstar. However, introducing specific mutations that optimize the charge complementarity between BLIP and TEM1 resulted in the introduction of significant DeltaDeltaG(double dagger)(int) values also between residues of these two proteins. While electrostatic interactions make major contributions towards stabilizing the transition state, we show two examples where steric hindrance exerts an effect on the transition state as well. To model the transition-state structures from the experimental DeltaDeltaG(double dagger)(int) values, we introduced a method for structure perturbation, searching for those inter-protein orientations that best support the experimental DeltaDeltaG(double dagger)(int) values. Two types of transition states were found, specific as observed for Barnase-Barstar and the electrostatically optimized TEM1-BLIP mutants, and diffusive as shown for wild-type TEM1-BLIP and IFNalpha2-IFNAR2. The specific transition states are characterized by defined inter-protein orientations, which cannot be modeled for the diffusive transition states. Mutations introduced through rational design can change the transition state from diffusive to specific. Together, these data provide a structural view of the mechanism allowing rates of association to differ by five orders of magnitude between different protein complexes.