Analysis of Moloney murine leukemia virus revertants mutated at the gag-pol junction.

Among Moloney murine leukemia viruses (Mo-MuLVs) having stop codons other than UAG at the gag-pol junction, Mo-MuLV with UAA, but not with UGA, had a replication disadvantage. Mo-MuLV with a glutamine codon (CAG) at the junction did not replicate. A revertant of this virus consisted of the original virus and a virus with a deletion of the pol region. Protease and Pr65gag encoded by their respective genomes complemented each other.     

UAG readthrough is not increased in vivo by Moloney murine leukemia virus infection.

Expression of the pol gene of the murine leukemia viruses is subject to translational control at the UAG termination codon of the upstream gene gag. Previous experiments have suggested that: i) Moloney murine leukemia virus infection induces a tRNA(Gln)iii) in an in vitro system using the tobacco mosaic virus as template, this tRNA is able to increase readthrough at the UAG codon [1]. Here we demonstrate that, in vivo, Moloney murine leukemia virus infection does not increase translational readthrough at either the tobacco mosaic virus or the Moloney murine leukemia virus UAG stop codons.     

Processive Selenocysteine Incorporation during Synthesis of Eukaryotic Selenoproteins

Selenoproteins are a family of proteins that share the common feature of containing selenocysteine, the “twenty-first” amino acid. Selenocysteine incorporation occurs during translation of selenoprotein messages by redefinition of UGA codons, which normally specify termination of translation. Studies of the eukaryotic selenocysteine incorporation mechanism suggest that selenocysteine insertion is inefficient compared with termination. Nevertheless, selenoprotein P and several other selenoproteins are known to contain multiple selenocysteines. The production of full-length (FL) protein from these messages would seem to demand highly efficient selenocysteine incorporation due to the compounding effect of termination at each UGA codon. We present data demonstrating that efficient incorporation of multiple selenocysteines can be reconstituted in rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation reactions. Selenocysteine incorporation at the first UGA codon is inefficient but increases by approximately 10-fold at subsequent downstream UGA codons. We found that ribosomes in the “processive” phase of selenocysteine incorporation (i.e., after decoding the first UGA codon as selenocysteine) are fully competent to terminate translation at UAG and UAA codons, that ribosomes become less efficient at selenocysteine incorporation as the distance between UGA codons is increased, and that efficient selenocysteine incorporation is not dependent on cis-acting elements unique to selenoprotein P. Furthermore, we found that the percentage of ribosomes decoding a UGA codon as selenocysteine rather than termination can be increased by 3- to 5-fold by placing the murine leukemia virus UAG read-through element upstream of the first UGA codon or by providing a competing messenger RNA in trans. The mechanisms of selenocysteine incorporation and selenoprotein synthesis are discussed in light of these results.     

Lack of peptide-release activity responding to codon UGA in Mycoplasma capricolum.

In Mycoplasma capricolum, a relative of Gram-positive eubacteria with a high genomic AT-content (75%), codon UGA is assigned to tryptophan instead of termination signal. Thus, in this bacterium the release factor 2 (RF-2), that recognizes UAA and UGA termination codons in eubacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, would be either specific to UAA or deleted. To test this, we have constructed a cell-free translation system using synthetic mRNA including codon UAA [mRNA(UAA)], UAG [mRNA(UAG)] and UGA [mRNA(UGA)] in-frame. In the absence of tryptophan, the translation of mRNA(UGA) ceased at UGA sites without appreciable release of the synthesized peptides from the ribosomes, whereas with mRNA(UAA) or mRNA(UAG) the bulk of the peptides was released. Upon addition of the E.coli S-100 fraction or B.subtilis S-100 fraction to the translation system, the synthesized peptides with mRNA(UGA) were almost completely released from the ribosomes, presumably because of the presence of RF-2 active to UGA in the added S-100 fraction. These data suggest that RF-2 is deleted or its activity to UGA is strongly weakened in M.capricolum.     

On the role of the termination factor RF-2 and the 16S RNA in protein synthesis

In the translational termination step of protein synthesis the three termination codons UAA, UAG or UGA are recognized by so-called release or termination factors. The release factor RF-1 interacts with UAG and UAA whereas RF-2 is specific for UGA and UAA. Two mechanisms concerning the termination event have been discussed so far: recognition of the termination codon by the protein in a tRNA-like manner or double-strand formation between the codon and the 3' end of the 16S rRNA which is stabilized by the termination factor. Using equilibrium dialysis we show that 40% of the ribosomes can bind UGAA in an RF-2-dependent manner. The stability with the correct combination RF-2-UGA is tenfold higher as compared to the wrong termination codon UAG. We confirm prior findings that the termination factor RF-2 is bound to the A-site of the ribosome. In addition to the ribosomal proteins L2, L10, L7/L12 and L20 of the large subunit and S6 and S18 of the small subunit, the 16S rRNA became labelled when radioactive UGA was crosslinked to the ribosome in the presence of RF-2. Our data support a mechanism of termination in which a double strand between the termination codon and the 3' end of the 16S rRNA is formed as the starting event. The resulting RNA-RNA double strand in turn may be recognized and stabilized by the termination factor.     

Distinct eRF3 requirements suggest alternate eRF1 conformations mediate peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination

Organisms that use the standard genetic code recognize UAA, UAG, and UGA as stop codons, whereas variant code species frequently alter this pattern of stop codon recognition. We previously demonstrated that a hybrid eRF1 carrying the Euplotes octocarinatus domain 1 fused to Saccharomyces cerevisiae domains 2 and 3 (Eo/Sc eRF1) recognized UAA and UAG, but not UGA, as stop codons. In the current study, we identified mutations in Eo/Sc eRF1 that restore UGA recognition and define distinct roles for the TASNIKS and YxCxxxF motifs in eRF1 function. Mutations in or near the YxCxxxF motif support the cavity model for stop codon recognition by eRF1. Mutations in the TASNIKS motif eliminated the eRF3 requirement for peptide release at UAA and UAG codons, but not UGA codons. These results suggest that the TASNIKS motif and eRF3 function together to trigger eRF1 conformational changes that couple stop codon recognition and peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination.     

Connection between stop codon reassignment and frequent use of shifty stop frameshifting

Ciliated protozoa of the genus Euplotes have undergone genetic code reassignment, redefining the termination codon UGA to encode cysteine. In addition, Euplotes spp. genes very frequently employ shifty stop frameshifting. Both of these phenomena involve noncanonical events at a termination codon, suggesting they might have a common cause. We recently demonstrated that Euplotes octocarinatus peptide release factor eRF1 ignores UGA termination codons while continuing to recognize UAA and UAG. Here we show that both the Tetrahymena thermophila and E. octocarinatus eRF1 factors allow efficient frameshifting at all three termination codons, suggesting that UGA redefinition also impaired UAA/UAG recognition. Mutations of the Euplotes factor restoring a phylogenetically conserved motif in eRF1 (TASNIKS) reduced programmed frameshifting at all three termination codons. Mutation of another conserved residue, Cys124, strongly reduces frameshifting at UGA while actually increasing frameshifting at UAA/UAG. We will discuss these results in light of recent biochemical characterization of these mutations.     

Is UAA or UGA part of the recognition signal for ribosomal initiation?

In none of the 92 published prokaryotic sequences is a translation codon preceeded by UAG as the first "termination codon". In most cases the UAA or UGA is close to the initiation codon and may be part of the ribosome recognition signal.     

Distinct paths to stop codon reassignment by the variant-code organisms Tetrahymena and Euplotes

The reassignment of stop codons is common among many ciliate species. For example, Tetrahymena species recognize only UGA as a stop codon, while Euplotes species recognize only UAA and UAG as stop codons. Recent studies have shown that domain 1 of the translation termination factor eRF1 mediates stop codon recognition. While it is commonly assumed that changes in domain 1 of ciliate eRF1s are responsible for altered stop codon recognition, this has never been demonstrated in vivo. To carry out such an analysis, we made hybrid proteins that contained eRF1 domain 1 from either Tetrahymena thermophila or Euplotes octocarinatus fused to eRF1 domains 2 and 3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that the Tetrahymena hybrid eRF1 efficiently terminated at all three stop codons when expressed in yeast cells, indicating that domain 1 is not the sole determinant of stop codon recognition in Tetrahymena species. In contrast, the Euplotes hybrid facilitated efficient translation termination at UAA and UAG codons but not at the UGA codon. Together, these results indicate that while domain 1 facilitates stop codon recognition, other factors can influence this process. Our findings also indicate that these two ciliate species used distinct approaches to diverge from the universal genetic code.     

Isolation of a rat mitochondrial release factor. Accommodation of the changed genetic code for termination

A single release factor has been isolated and partially purified from rat mitochondria. It requires ethanol in addition to the specific termination codon when assayed in a heterologous system with Escherichia coli ribosomes. The factor recognizes the codons UAA and UAG but not UGA, and therefore it has been designated mtRF-1. A factor of the bacterial RF-2 type, which in E. coli recognizes UGA, or of the mammalian type, which recognizes all three termination codons, has not been detected in mitochondria. The absence of a factor responding to UGA accommodates the use of this codon as a signal for tryptophan in the rat mitochondrial genetic code. The mtRF-1 could translate all of the known termination codons in the rat mitochondrial genome. It does not respond to AGG and AGA which in bovine and human mitochondrial DNA code for termination but which in rat mitochondria may not code for either an amino acid or for termination.     

5' contexts of Escherichia coli and human termination codons are similar.

The nearest 5' context of 2559 human stop codons was analysed in comparison with the same context of stop-like codons (UGG, UGC, UGU, CGA for UGA; CAA, UAU, UAC for UAA; and UGG, UAU, UAC, CAG for UAG). The non-random distribution of some nucleotides upstream of the stop codons was observed. For instance, uridine is over-represented in position -3 upstream of UAG. Several codons were shown to be over-represented immediately upstream of the stop codons: UUU(Phe), AGC(Ser), and the Lys and Ala codon families before UGA; AAG(Lys), GCG(Ala), and the Ser and Leu codon families before UAA; and UCA(Ser), AUG(Met), and the Phe codon family before UAG. In contrast, the Thr and Gly codon families were under-represented before UGA, while ACC(Thr) and the Gly codon family were under-represented before UAG and UAA respectively. In an earlier study, uridine was shown to be over-represented in position -3 before UGA in Escherichia coli [Arkov,A.L., Korolev,S.V. and Kisselev,L.L. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res., 21,2891-2897]. In that study, the codons for Lys, Phe and Ser were shown to be over-represented immediately upstream of E. coli stop codons. Consequently, E. coli and human termination codons have similar 5' contexts. The present study suggests that the 5' context of stop codons may modulate the efficiency of peptide chain termination and (or) stop codon readthrough in higher eukaryotes, and that the mechanisms of such a modulation in prokaryotes and higher eukaryotes may be very similar.     

Expression of the gag-pol fusion protein of Moloney murine leukemia virus without gag protein does not induce virion formation or proteolytic processing.

A mutant of Moloney murine leukemia virus was generated in which the UAG termination codon at the 3' end of the gag gene was changed to a CAG codon encoding glutamine. Cells carrying the mutant provirus constitutively express the gag-pol fusion protein and no detectable gag protein. The precursor is stable, is not processed by the protease domain within the precursor, and does not induce assembly and release of virion particles.     

The involvement of base 1054 in 16S rRNA for UGA stop codon dependent translational termination.

The deletion of the highly conserved cytidine nucleotide at position 1054 in E. coli 16S rRNA has been characterized to confer an UGA stop codon specific suppression activity which suggested a functional participation of small subunit rRNA in translational termination. Based on this structure-function correlation we constructed the three point mutations at site 1054, changing the wild-type C residue to an A, G or U base. The mutations were expressed from a complete plasmid encoded rRNA operon (rrnB) using a conditional expression system with the lambda PL-promoter. All three altered 16S rRNA molecules were expressed and incorporated into 70S ribosomal particles. Structural analysis of the protein and 16S rRNA moieties of the mutant ribosomes showed no differences when compared to wild-type particles. The phenotypic analysis revealed that only the 1054G base change led to a significantly reduced generation time of transformed cells, which could be correlated with the inability of the mutant ribosomes to specifically stop at UGA stop codons in vivo. The response towards UAA and UAG termination codons was not altered. Furthermore, in vitro RF-2 termination factor binding experiments indicated that the association behaviour of mutant ribosomes was not changed, enforcing the view that the UGA stop codon suppression is a direct consequence of the rRNA mutation. Taken together, these results argue for a direct participation of that 16S rRNA motif in UGA dependent translational termination and furthermore, suggest that termination factor binding and stop codon recognition are two separate steps of the termination event.     

Pseudoknot-dependent read-through of retroviral gag termination codons: importance of sequences in the spacer and loop 2.

Retroviruses whose gag and pol genes are in the same reading frame depend upon approximately 5% read-through of the gag UAG termination codon to make the gag-pol polyprotein. For murine leukemia virus, this read-through is dependent on a pseudoknot located eight nucleotides 3' of the UAG. Other retroviruses whose gag and pol genes are in the same frame can potentially form similar pseudoknots 3' of their UAG codons. Beyond the similar secondary structures, there is strong sequence conservation in the spacer region and in loop 2 of the pseudoknots. The detrimental effects of substitutions of several of these conserved spacer and loop 2 nucleotides in the murine leukemia virus sequence show their importance for the read-through process. The importance of specific nucleotides in loop 2 of the pseudoknot contrasts with the flexibility of sequence in loop 2 of the most intensively studied frameshift-promoting pseudoknot which occurs in infectious bronchitis virus. Two nucleotides in loop 2 of the murine leukemia virus pseudoknot, which were shown to be important by mutagenic analysis, display hypersensitivity to the single-strand specific nuclease, S1. They are likely to be particularly accessible or are in an unusually reactive conformation.