Binding and cleavage of unstructured RNA by nuclear RNase P

Ribonuclease P (RNase P) is an essential endoribonuclease for which the best-characterized function is processing the 5' leader of pre-tRNAs. Compared to bacterial RNase P, which contains a single small protein subunit and a large catalytic RNA subunit, eukaryotic nuclear RNase P is more complex, containing nine proteins and an RNA subunit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Consistent with this, nuclear RNase P has been shown to possess unique RNA binding capabilities. To understand the unique molecular recognition of nuclear RNase P, the interaction of S. cerevisiae RNase P with single-stranded RNA was characterized. Unstructured, single-stranded RNA inhibits RNase P in a size-dependent manner, suggesting that multiple interactions are required for high affinity binding. Mixed-sequence RNAs from protein-coding regions also bind strongly to the RNase P holoenzyme. However, in contrast to poly(U) homopolymer RNA that is not cleaved, a variety of mixed-sequence RNAs have multiple preferential cleavage sites that do not correspond to identifiable consensus structures or sequences. In addition, pre-tRNA(Tyr), poly(U)(50) RNA, and mixed-sequence RNA cross-link with purified RNase P in the RNA subunit Rpr1 near the active site in "Conserved Region I," although the exact positions vary. Additional contacts between poly(U)(50) and the RNase P proteins Rpr2p and Pop4p were identified. We conclude that unstructured RNAs interact with multiple protein and RNA contacts near the RNase P RNA active site, but that cleavage depends on the nature of interaction with the active site.     

RNase P RNA mediated cleavage: substrate recognition and catalysis

The universally conserved endoribonuclease P consists of one RNA subunit and, depending on its origin, a variable number of protein subunits. RNase P is involved in the processing of a large variety of substrates in the cell, the preferred substrate being tRNA precursors. Cleavage activity does not require the presence of the protein subunit(s) in vitro. This is true for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNase P RNA suggesting that the RNA based catalytic activity has been preserved during evolution. Progress has been made in our understanding of the contribution of residues and chemical groups both in the substrate as well as in RNase P RNA to substrate binding and catalysis. Moreover, we have access to two crystal structures of bacterial RNase P RNA but we still lack the structure of RNase P RNA in complex with its substrate and/or the protein subunit. Nevertheless, these recent advancements put us in a new position to study the way and nature of interactions between in particular RNase P RNA and its substrate. In this review I will discuss various aspects of the RNA component of RNase P with an emphasis on our current understanding of the interaction between RNase P RNA and its substrate.     

Site-specific cleavage of MS2 RNA by a thermostable DNA-linked RNase H

A series of DNA-linked RNases H, in which the 15-mer DNA is cross-linked to the Thermus thermophilus RNase HI (TRNH) variants at positions 135, 136, 137 and 138, were constructed and analyzed for their abilities to cleave the complementary 15-mer RNA. Of these, that with the DNA adduct at position 135 most efficiently cleaved the RNA substrate, indicating that position 135 is the most appropriate cross-linking site among those examined. To examine whether DNA-linked RNase H also site-specifically cleaves a highly structured natural RNA, DNA-linked TRNHs with a series of DNA adducts varying in size at position 135 were constructed and analyzed for their abilities to cleave MS2 RNA. These DNA adducts were designed such that DNA-linked enzymes cleave MS2 RNA at a loop around residue 2790. Of the four DNA-linked TRNHs with the 8-, 12-, 16- and 20-mer DNA adducts, only that with the 16-mer DNA adduct efficiently and site-specifically cleaved MS2 RNA. Primer extension revealed that this DNA-linked TRNH cleaved MS2 RNA within the target sequence.     

RNase H mediated cleavage of RNA by cyclohexene nucleic acid (CeNA)

Cyclohexene nucleic acid (CeNA) forms a duplex with RNA that is more stable than a DNA–RNA duplex (ΔT_m per modification: +2°C). A cyclohexenyl A nucleotide adopts a 3′-endo conformation when introduced in dsDNA. The neighbouring deoxynucleotide adopts an O4′-endo conformation. The CeNA:RNA duplex is cleaved by RNase H. The V_max and K_m of the cleavage reaction for CeNA:RNA and DNA:RNA is in the same range, although the k_cat value is about 600 times lower in the case of CeNA:RNA.     

Structural basis of cleavage by RNase H of hybrids of arabinonucleic acids and RNA

The origins of the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli RNase H1 (termed RNase H here), an enzyme that hydrolyzes the RNA strand of DNA-RNA hybrids, are not understood at present. Although the enzyme binds double-stranded RNA, no cleavage occurs with such duplexes [Lima, W. F., and Crooke, S. T. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 390]. Therefore, the hybrid substrates may not adopt a canonical A-form geometry. Furthermore, RNase H is exquisitely sensitive to chemical modification of the DNA strands in hybrid duplexes. This is particularly relevant to the RNase H-dependent pathway of antisense action. Thus, only very few of the modifications currently being evaluated as antisense therapeutics are tolerated by the enzyme, among them phosphorothioate DNA (PS-DNA). Recently, hybrids of RNA and arabinonucleic acid (ANA) as well as the 2'F-ANA analogue were shown to be substrates of RNase H [Damha, M. J., et al. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 12976]. Using X-ray crystallography, we demonstrate here that ANA analogues, such as 2'F-ANA [Berger, I., et al. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 2473] and [3.3.0]bicyclo-ANA (bc-ANA), may not be able to adopt sugar puckers that are compatible with pure A- or a B-form duplex geometries, but rather prefer the intermediate O4'-endo conformation. On the basis of the observed conformations of these ANA analogues in a DNA dodecamer duplex, we have modeled a duplex of an all-C3'-endo RNA strand and an all-O4'-endo 2'F-ANA strand. This duplex exhibits a minor groove width that is intermediate between that of A-form RNA and B-form DNA, a feature that may be exploited by the enzyme in differentiating between RNA duplexes and DNA-RNA hybrids. Therefore, the combination of the established structural and functional properties of ANA analogues helps settle existing controversies concerning the discrimination of substrates by RNase H. Knowlegde of the structure of an analogue that exhibits enhanced RNA affinity while not interfering with RNase H activity may prove helpful in the design of future antisense modifications.     

Efficient site-specific cleavage by RNase MRP requires interaction with two evolutionarily conserved mitochondrial RNA sequences.

RNase MRP is a site-specific endonuclease that processes primer mitochondrial RNA from the leading-strand origin of mitochondrial DNA replication. Using deletional analysis and saturation mutagenesis, we have determined the substrate requirements for cleavage by mouse mitochondrial RNase MRP. Two regions of sequence homology among vertebrate mitochondrial RNA primers, conserved sequence blocks II and III, were found to be critical for both efficient and accurate cleavage; a third region of sequence homology, conserved sequence block I, was dispensable. Analysis of insertion and deletion mutations within conserved sequence block II demonstrated that the specificity of RNase MRP accommodates the natural sequence heterogeneity of conserved sequence block II in vivo. Heterologous assays with human RNase MRP and mutated mouse mitochondrial RNA substrates indicated that sequences essential for substrate recognition are conserved between mammalian species.     

Targeted cleavage of RNA molecules by human RNase P using minimized external guide sequences

The endoribonuclease RNase P processes tRNA-like structures that are assembled out of two separate strands. In these bimolecular constructs, one of the strands is cleaved by the enzyme, and the other one is called the external guide sequence (EGS). A number of EGS with different mutations and deletions were tested for the ability to induce cleavage with human RNase P. Different domains of the original tRNAtyr-like structure were deleted or modified. The anticodon stem and loop and the variable loop could be deleted without a detrimental effect on recognition by RNase P. Modifications in the lengths of T stem and aminoacyl acceptor stem led to a decrease in the relative amount of cleavage, whereas modifications of the D stem were more permissible. Single nucleotide deletions in the T loop reduced cleavage to different extents, depending on the position. Values for the Kd of complex formation of bimolecular constructs with annealing arms of varying lengths ranged from 0.2 nM to 28 nM. A cleavage rate of 1 min(-1) was measured for both the bimolecular target-EGS complex and tRNA precursor.     

Sequence-specific cleavage of RNA using chimeric DNA splints and RNase H

To cleave RNA molecules using E. coli RNase H in a site-specific manner, a short oligodeoxyribonucleotide (3-5 mer) linked with oligo(2'-O-methyl)ribonucleotide(s) was designed to be used as a DNA splint. Our model experiments with ribooligomer the splint duplexes (9 mers) and RNase H demonstrated that a tetradeoxynucleotide cluster seems to be sufficient for the enzyme recognition and the short DNA-containing splint directs a unique cleavage of RNA by RNase H. The method could be applied to longer ribooligonucleotide substrates. For example, when 3'm (GA)d(AGAA)m(GGU)5' was used as a hybridization strand, 32pUCUUUCUUCUUCCAGGAU was cleaved specifically between U11 and C12 to yield 32pUCUUUCUUCUU. This method will have a variety of applications for the study of RNA.     

Rescue of the RNA phage genome from RNase III cleavage.

The secondary structure of the RNA from the single-stranded RNA bacteriophages, like MS2 and Qb, has evolved to serve a variety of functions such as controlling gene expression, exposing binding sites for the replicase and capsid proteins, allowing strand separation and so forth. On the other hand, all of these foldings have to perform in bacterial cells in which various RNA splitting enzymes are present. We therefore examined whether phage RNA structure is under selective pressure by host RNases. Here we show this to be true for RNase III. A fully double-stranded hairpin of 17 bp, which is an RNase III target, was inserted into a non-coding region of the MS2 RNA genome. In an RNase III-host these phages survived but in wild-type bacteria they did not. Here the stem underwent Darwinian evolution to a structure that was no longer a substrate for RNase III. This was achieved in three different ways: (i) the perfect stem was maintained but shortened by removing all or most of the insert; (ii) the stem acquired suppressor mutations that replaced Watson-Crick base pairs by mismatches; (iii) the stem acquired small deletions or insertions that created bulges. These insertions consist of short stretches of non-templated A or U residues. Their origin is ascribed to polyadenylation at the site of the RNase III cut (in the + or - strand) either by Escherichia coli poly(A) polymerase or by idling MS2 replicase.     

A short phosphodiester window is sufficient to direct RNase H-dependent RNA cleavage by antisense peptide nucleic acid

The potential pharmacologic benefits of using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) as an antisense agent are tempered by its incapacity to activate RNase H. The mixed backbone oligonucleotide (ON) (or gapmer) approach, in which a short internal window of RNAse H-competent residues is embedded within an RNase H-incompetent ON has not been applied previously to PNA because PNA and DNA hybridize to RNA with very different helical structures, creating structural perturbations at the two PNA-DNA junctions. It is demonstrated here for the first time that a short internal phosphodiester window within a PNA is sufficient to evoke the RNase H-dependent cleavage of a targeted RNA and to abrogate translation elongation in a well-characterized in vitro assay.     

Bulged-out nucleotides protect an antisense RNA from RNase III cleavage.

Bulged-out nucleotides or internal loops are present in the stem-loop structures of several antisense RNAs. We have used the antisense/target RNA system (CopA/CopT) that controls the copy number of plasmid R1 to examine the possible biological function of bulged-out nucleotides. Two regions within the major stem-loop of the antisense RNA, CopA, carry bulged-out nucleotides. Base pairing in either one or both of these regions of the stem was restored by site-specific mutagenesis and in one case a new internal loop was introduced. The set of mutant and wild-type CopA variants was characterized structurally in vitro. The results reported here indicate a possible function of the bulges: their presence protects CopA RNA from being a substrate for the double-strand-specific enzyme RNase III. In vitro cleavage rates were drastically increased when either the lower or both bulges were absent. This is paralleled by a similar, but not identical, effect of the bulges on metabolic stability of the CopA RNAs in vivo. The degradation pathways of wild-type and mutant CopA in various strain backgrounds are discussed. In the accompanying paper, we address the significance of bulges in CopA for binding to the target RNA in vitro and for its inhibitory efficiency in vivo.     

Basis for regulated RNA cleavage by functional analysis of RNase L and Ire1p

RNase L and Ire1p are members of a superfamily of regulated endoribonucleases that play essential roles in mediating diverse types of cellular stress responses. 2'-5' oligoadenylates, produced in response to interferon treatment and viral double-stranded RNA, are necessary to activate RNase L. In contrast, unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum activate Ire1p, a transmembrane serine/threonine kinase and endoribonuclease. To probe their similarities and differences, molecular properties of wild-type and mutant forms of human RNase L and yeast Ire1p were compared. Surprisingly, RNase L and Ire1p showed mutually exclusive RNA substrate specificity and partially overlapping but not identical requirements for phylogenetically conserved amino acid residues in their nuclease domains. A functional model for RNase L was generated based on the comparative analysis with Ire1p that assigns novel roles for ankyrin repeats and kinase-like domains.     

Complexity in orchestration of chemical groups near different cleavage sites in RNase P RNA mediated cleavage

RNase P mediated cleavage of the tRNA(His) precursor does not rely on the formation of the "+73/294 interaction" to give the correct cleavage product, i.e. cleavage at -1, while other tRNA precursors that are cleaved at the canonical site +1 do. A previous model, here referred to as the "2'OH-model", predicts that the 2'OH at the canonical cleavage site would affect cleavage at -1. Here we used model RNA hairpin substrates mimicking the structural architecture of the tRNA(His) precursor cleavage site to investigate the role of 2'OH with respect to ground state binding and rate of cleavage in the presence and absence of the +73/294 interaction. Our data emphasize the importance of the 2'OH in the immediate vicinity of the scissile bond. Moreover, introduction of 2'H at the cleavage site did not affect cleavage at an alternative cleavage site to any significant extent. Our findings are therefore inconsistent with the 2'OH model. We favor a model where the 2'OH at the cleavage site influence Mg2+ binding in its vicinity, however we do not exclude the possibility that the 2'OH at the cleavage site interacts with RNase P RNA. Studying the importance of the 2'OH at different cleavage sites also indicated a higher dependence on the 2'OH at the cleavage site in the absence of the +73/294 interaction than in its presence. Finally, we provide data suggesting that N3 of U at position -1 in the substrate is most likely not involved in an interaction with RNase P RNA.     

Enzymatic cleavage of RNA by RNA

The catalytic activity of E. coli RNase P, an enzyme essential for tRNA biosynthesis in vivo, resides in the RNA subunit of the enzyme. This RNA, which has all the properties of a classical enzyme, can cleave precursor tRNAs in vitro in the total absence of proteins.