Foliar-applied Dormex™ or thiourea-enhanced proline and biogenic amine contents and hastened breaking bud dormancy in “Ain Shemer” apple trees

The role of hydrogen cyanamide (Dormex?) or thiourea in the acceleration of dormancy breaking in buds of “Ain Shemer” apple (Malus sylvestris, Mill.) trees, and their effects on metabolic changes in the contents of proline and biogenic amines (BAs; tyramine, tryptamine, histamine, methylbutylamine and serotonin) in buds during bud break were assessed. The efficiency of bud break by these compounds was noticed to varying degrees. Breaking bud dormancy was correlated with the early date of bud break, the short duration of flowering, the high percentages of bud break and fruit set, and the high contents of proline and BAs. This finding was positively reflected in the tree’s yield. Dormex? was found to be more effective than thiourea; therefore, we recommend using Dormex? for early bud break, short period of flowering and high percentages of bud break and fruit set by regulating the contents of proline and BAs in buds.     

Identification and functional characterization of SOC1-like genes in Pyrus bretschneideri

Flowering is a prerequisite for pear fruit production. Therefore, the development of flower buds and the control of flowering time are important for pear trees. However, the molecular mechanism of pear flowering is unclear. SOC1, a member of MADS-box family, is known as a flowering signal integrator in Arabidopsis. We identified eight SOC1-like genes in Pyrus bretschneideri and analyzed their basic information and expression patterns. Some pear SOC1-like genes were regulated by photoperiod in leaves. Moreover, the expression patterns were diverse during the development of pear flower buds. Two members of the pear SOC1-like genes, PbSOC1d and PbSOC1g, could lead to early flowering phenotype when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. PbSOC1d and PbSOC1g were identified as activators of the floral meristem identity genes AtAP1 and AtLFY and promote flowering time. These results suggest that PbSOC1d and PbSOC1g are promoters of flowering time and may be involved in flower bud development in pear.     

Shoot bending promotes flower bud formation by miRNA‐mediated regulation in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)

Flower induction in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees plays an important life cycle role, but young trees produce fewer and inferior quality flower buds. Therefore, shoot bending has become an important cultural practice, significantly promoting the capacity to develop more flower buds during the growing seasons. Additionally, microRNAs (miRNAs) play essential roles in plant growth, flower induction and stress responses. In this study, we identified miRNAs potentially involved in the regulation of bud growth, and flower induction and development, as well as in the response to shoot bending. Of the 195 miRNAs identified, 137 were novel miRNAs. The miRNA expression profiles revealed that the expression levels of 68 and 27 known miRNAs were down‐regulated and up‐regulated, respectively, in response to shoot bending, and that the 31 differentially expressed novel miRNAs between them formed five major clusters. Additionally, a complex regulatory network associated with auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) plays important roles in cell division, bud growth and flower induction, in which related miRNAs and targets mediated regulation. Among them, miR396, 160, 393, and their targets associated with AUX, miR159, 319, 164, and their targets associated with ABA and GA, and flowering‐related miRNAs and genes, regulate bud growth and flower bud formation in response to shoot bending. Meanwhile, the flowering genes had significantly higher expression levels during shoot bending, suggesting that they are involved in this regulatory process. This study provides a framework for the future analysis of miRNAs associated with multiple hormones and their roles in the regulation of bud growth, and flower induction and formation in response to shoot bending in apple trees.     

How plant allometry influences bud phenology and fruit yield in two Vaccinium species

Background and AimsUnderstanding how plant allometry, plant architecture and phenology contribute to fruit production can identify those plant traits that maximize fruit yield. In this study, we compared these variables and fruit yield for two shrub species, Vaccinium angustifolium and Vaccinium myrtilloides, to test the hypothesis that phenology is linked to the plants’ allometric traits, which are predictors of fruit production.MethodsWe measured leaf and flower phenology and the above-ground biomass of both Vaccinium species in a commercial wild lowbush blueberry field (Quebec, Canada) over a 2-year crop cycle; 1 year of pruning followed by 1 year of harvest. Leaf and flower phenology were measured, and the allometric traits of shoots and buds were monitored over the crop cycle. We hand-collected the fruits of each plant to determine fruit attributes and biomass.Key ResultsDuring the harvesting year, the leafing and flowering of V. angustifolium occurred earlier than that of V. myrtilloides. This difference was related to the allometric characteristics of the buds due to differences in carbon partitioning by the plants during the pruning year. Through structural equation modelling, we identified that the earlier leafing in V. angustifolium was related to a lower leaf bud number, while earlier flowering was linked to a lower number of flowers per bud. Despite differences in reproductive allometric traits, vegetative biomass still determined reproductive biomass in a log–log scale model.ConclusionsGrowing buds are competing sinks for non-structural carbohydrates. Their differences in both number and characteristics (e.g. number of flowers per bud) influence levels of fruit production and explain some of the phenological differences observed between the two Vaccinium species. For similar above-ground biomass, both Vaccinium species had similar reproductive outputs in terms of fruit biomass, despite differences in reproductive traits such as fruit size and number.     

Pear bud metabolism: seasonal changes in glucose utilization

Utilization of glucose, uracil and valine by flower and leaf buds of seedling pear trees (Pyrus calleryana Decne.) from the time of flower bud initiation to flowering was investigated. A very high rate of glucose utilization through the pentose phosphate pathway was observed throughout the development of buds. There was no difference in the type of glucose metabolism between flower and leaf buds except immediately before flowering, when the metabolism in flower buds was shifted toward the glycolytic pathway. Such a shift did not occur in leaf buds. The incorporation of uracil and valine into the nucleic acid and protein fraction of buds, respectively, was high throughout bud development, perhaps indicating a high rate of turnover in the resting buds. Incorporation of both compounds decreased when buds started to expand prior to flowering.     

Gibberellic Acid Reduces Flowering Intensity in Sweet Orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] by Repressing CiFT Gene Expression

In Citrus, gibberellic acid (GA₃) applied at the floral bud inductive period significantly reduces flowering intensity. This effect is being used to improve the fruit set of parthenocarpic cultivars that tend to flower profusely. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in the process remain unclear. To contribute to the knowledge of this phenomenon, adult trees of ‘Salustiana’ sweet orange were sprayed at the floral bud inductive period with 40?mg?L^?1 of GA₃ and the expression pattern of flowering genes was examined up to the onset of bud sprouting. Trees sprayed with paclobutrazol (PBZ, 2,000?mg L^?1), a gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, were used to confirm the effects, and untreated trees served as control. Bud sprouting, flowering intensity, and developed shoots were evaluated in the spring. GA₃ significantly reduced the number of flowers per 100 nodes by 72% compared to the control, whereas PBZ increased the number by 123%. Data of the expression pattern of flowering genes in leaves of GA₃-treated trees revealed that this plant growth regulator inhibited flowering by repressing relative expression of the homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, CiFT, whereas PBZ increased flowering by boosting its expression. The activity of the homologs TERMINAL FLOWER 1, FLOWERING LOCUS C, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1, and APETALA1 was not affected by the treatments. The number of flowers per inflorescence, in both leafy and leafless inflorescences, was not altered by GA₃ but increased with PBZ; the latter paralleled LEAFY relative expression. These results suggest that GA₃ inhibits flowering in Citrus by repressing CiFT expression in leaves.     

MicroRNA156 as a promising tool for alfalfa improvement

A precursor of miR156 (MsmiR156d) was cloned and overexpressed in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) as a means to enhance alfalfa biomass yield. Of the five predicted SPL genes encoded by the alfalfa genome, three (SPL6, SPL12 and SPL13) contain miR156 cleavage sites and their expression was down‐regulated in transgenic alfalfa plants overexpressing miR156. These transgenic plants had reduced internode length and stem thickness, enhanced shoot branching, increased trichome density, a delay in flowering time and elevated biomass production. Minor effects on sugar, starch, lignin and cellulose contents were also observed. Moreover, transgenic alfalfa plants had increased root length, while nodulation was maintained. The multitude of traits affected by miR156 may be due to the network of genes regulated by the three target SPLs. Our results show that the miR156/SPL system has strong potential as a tool to substantially improve quality and yield traits in alfalfa.     

The Cold Awakening of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Doritaenopsis</Emphasis> ‘Tinny Tender’ Orchid Flowers: The Role of Leaves in Cold-induced Bud Dormancy Release

Massive flowering of tropical Phalaenopsis orchids is coordinated by the cold-induced release of reproductive bud dormancy. Light and temperature are the two key factors integrated by the dormancy mechanism to both stop and reactivate the meristem development of many other angiosperm species, including fruit trees and ornamental plants. It is well established that leaves and roots play a major role in inducing flower development; however, currently, knowledge of molecular events associated with reproductive bud dormancy release in organs other than the bud is limited. Using differential gene expression, we have shown that the leaves of a hybrid of Phalaenopsis species, Doritaenopsis ‘Tinny Tender’, undergo major metabolic modifications. These changes result in the production of sucrose and amino acids, both of which can sustain bud outgrowth, and auxin and ethylene, which may play important roles in awaking the dormant buds. Intake of abscisic acid and synthesis of the hormone jasmonate may also explain the inhibition of vegetative growth that coincides with bud growth. Interestingly, many genes that were upregulated by cold treatment are homologous for genes involved in flower induction and vernalization in Arabidopsis, indicating that processes regulating flowering induction and those regulating reproductive bud dormancy release may use similar pathways and effector molecules.     

Exogenous dormancy-breaking substances positively change endogenous phytohormones and amino acids during dormancy release in ‘Anna’ apple trees

A 2-season trial was conducted to verify the effects of foliar applications of some dormancy-breaking substances (DBS) on dormancy release in buds of ‘Anna’ apple (Malus sylvestris, Mill) trees, as well as on metabolic changes in the contents of phytohormones, proline and arginine in buds during their release from dormancy. The efficiency of early bud break induced by Dormex?, potassium nitrate, mineral oil, calcium nitrate and thiourea was noticed in varying degrees. Although Dormex? was distinguished, all DBS hastened bud break, shortened flowering duration, improved bud break% and fruit-set%, increased the contents of gibberellic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, proline and arginine, but reduced abscisic acid content in buds as compared to the control. These results were positively reflected in the final tree yield. Accordingly, it is concluded that the use of Dormex?, at a rate of 4 %, could be recommended for reaching bud break as early as possible and improving ‘Anna’ apple tree yield under the short winters in Egypt and similar regions by regulating the contents of proline, arginine and phytohormones in buds.     

Changes in Dormancy and Sensitivity to Vernalization in Axillary Buds of Satsuma Mandarin Examined in vitro During the Annual Cycle

Effect of season and the presence of fruit on bud-endodormancyand the flowering response to low temperature treatments weredetermined using bud cultures of Owari satsuma mandarin (Citrusunshiu Marc). Bud dormancy was deeper in fruiting as comparedto defruited trees. In fruiting trees, the intensity of buddormancy was highest in spring, decreased to a low value byearly Jul. and then increased until early winter. This increasein dormancy during summer and early autumn did not occur innon-fruiting trees. No flowers formed in buds cultured betweenMay and Sep. Both in fruiting and defruited trees, buds becamecompetent to show a vernalization response to chilling by theend of Oct., at the time they also became capable of sproutingin vitro at low temperature (15/10 °C). There was a directeffect of fruit on the buds which persisted long after fruitremoval and resulted in a reduction of the flowering responseto chilling.Copyright 1995, 1999 Academic Press Citrus flowering, Citrus unshiu Marc., dormancy, flower induction, flowering, in vitro flowering, satsuma mandarin, vernalization     

Fruit load modulates flowering-related gene expression in buds of alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin

Background and Aims

Gene determination of flowering is the result of complex interactions involving both promoters and inhibitors. In this study, the expression of flowering-related genes at the meristem level in alternate-bearing citrus trees is analysed, together with the interplay between buds and leaves in the determination of flowering.

Methods

First defruiting experiments were performed to manipulate blossoming intensity in ‘Moncada’ mandarin, Citrus clementina. Further defoliation was performed to elucidate the role leaves play in the flowering process. In both cases, the activity of flowering-related genes was investigated at the flower induction (November) and differentiation (February) stages.

Key Results

Study of the expression pattern of flowering-genes in buds from on (fully loaded) and off (without fruits) trees revealed that homologues of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CiFT), TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF), APETALA1 (CsAP1) and LEAFY (CsLFY) were negatively affected by fruit load. CiFT and TSF activities showed a marked increase in buds from off trees through the study period (ten-fold in November). By contrast, expression of the homologues of the flowering inhibitors of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (CsTFL), TERMINAL FLOWER 2 (TFL2) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) was generally lower in off trees. Regarding floral identity genes, the increase in CsAP1 expression in off trees was much greater in buds than in leaves, and significant variations in CsLFY expression (approx. 20 %) were found only in February. Defoliation experiments further revealed that the absence of leaves completely abolished blossoming and severely affected the expression of most of the flowering-related genes, particularly decreasing the activity of floral promoters and of CsAP1 at the induction stage.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the presence of fruit affects flowering by greatly altering gene-expression not only at the leaf but also at the meristem level. Although leaves are required for flowering to occur, their absence strongly affects the activity of floral promoters and identity genes.     

Effect of crop load on phytohormones,sugars, and biennial bearing in apple trees

The amount and composition of phytohormones, sugars, and some other leaf characteristics depending on a crop load were evaluated in apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Ligol grafted on P 60 rootstock) trees in order to prevent biennial bearing. The crop load was adjusted to 12 (control, unthinned), 8, 4, and 0 (non-fruiting) inflorescences (or fruits) per cm² of trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA). Inflorescences were removed in May before flowering. Phytohormones were analyzed in axillary buds and leaves in September. Results show that, in contrast to the unthinned trees, thinning to 4 fruits cm^?2(TCSA) resulted in a significant decrease of yield per tree, but a significant increase of fruit mass, return bloom, and leaf area. The heavy crop load resulted in suppressed bloom in the following year. Composition and content of phytohormones was changed considerably. Moreover, thinning resulted in an increased hexose accumulation. Such data suggest that flowering inhibition depended on the phytohormones that were exported to buds and on sugar-hormone signalling cross-talk.     

Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing 'Moncada' mandarin

Background and Aims

The presence of fruit has been widely reported to act as an inhibitor of flowering in fruit trees. This study is an investigation into the effect of fruit load on flowering of ‘Moncada’ mandarin and on the expression of putative orthologues of genes involved in flowering pathways to provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying alternate bearing in citrus.

Methods

The relationship between fruit load and flowering intensity was examined first. Defruiting experiments were further conducted to demonstrate the causal effect of fruit removal upon flowering. Finally, the activity of flowering-related genes was investigated to determine the extent to which their seasonal expression is affected by fruit yield.

Key Results

First observations and defruiting experiments indicated a significant inverse relationship between preceding fruit load and flowering intensity. Moreover, data indicated that when fruit remained on the tree from November onwards, a dramatic inhibition of flowering occurred the following spring. The study of the expression pattern of flowering-genes of on (fully loaded) and off (without fruits) trees revealed that homologues of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), SUPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1), APETALA1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY) were negatively affected by fruit load. Thus, CiFT expression showed a progressive increase in leaves from off trees through the study period, the highest differences found from December onwards (10-fold). Whereas differences in the relative expression of SOC1 only reached significance from September to mid-December, CsAP1 expression was constantly higher in those trees through the whole study period. Significant variations in CsLFY expression only were found in late February (close to 20 %). On the other hand, the expression of the homologues of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) did not appear to be related to fruit load.

Conclusions

These results suggest for the first time that fruit inhibits flowering by repressing CiFT and SOC1 expression in leaves of alternate-bearing citrus. Fruit also reduces CsAP1 expression in leaves, and the significant increase in leaf CsLFY expression from off trees in late February was associated with the onset of floral differentiation.