Predominance of histamine H1 receptors on liver plasma membrane

We quantitatively determined the receptors for histamine H1, histamine H2, alpha- and beta-adrenergic, prostaglandin E2 and F2 alpha in liver plasma membranes. The number of the receptors was the greatest in histamine H1 receptors (4740 +/- 750 fmol/mg protein) and the second in alpha-adrenergic receptors (965 +/- 16). Although relatively small numbers of the receptors were observed for histamine H2 (116 +/- 11) and prostaglandin E2 (38.0 +/- 8.9), we could not determine the number and affinity of beta-adrenergic and prostaglandin F2 alpha receptors. In contrast to the number of receptors, there was not significant difference in the affinities of receptors for histamine H1, histamine H2, alpha-adrenergic hormone and prostaglandin E2. These results suggest that histamine and its receptor play some role in liver function.     

3H]mepyramine binding to histamine H1 receptors in bovine retina

The promethazine-sensitive [3H]mepyramine binding was used to determine the presence of histamine H1 receptors in membranes from bovine retina. Specific mepyramine binding to retinal membranes was reversible, saturable and of high affinity. The apparent dissociation constant (KD = 2.2 +/- 0.4 nM) and the density of binding sites (Bmax = 60.9 +/- 5.1 fmol/mg protein), obtained in equilibrium studies, were similar to those found in bovine brain cortex. Binding was stereospecific and the inhibitory potencies of H1 and H2 antagonists indicated that [3H] mepyramine binding sites in the retina have characteristics of H1 receptors.     

Differential activation of dual signaling responses by human H1 and H2 histamine receptors

Stimulation of human H1 and H2-histamine receptors (HRs) primarily activates signaling pathways to increase intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and cyclic AMP (cAMP), respectively. Activation of H2-HR in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells by histamine and dimaprit increases both cAMP formation and [Ca2+]i, as determined by cAMP-scintillation proximity assays and fluorescence imaging plate reader (FLIPR) assays. In HEK cells expressing relatively high levels of H2-HR (Bmax=26 pmol/mg protein), histamine and dimaprit are full agonists in eliciting cAMP responses with pEC50 values of 9.30 and 7.72 that are 1000-fold more potent than their respective pEC50 values of 6.13 and 4.91 for increasing [Ca2+]i. The agonist potencies decrease for both responses at lower H2-HR density (5 pmol/mg protein) and dimaprit exhibits partial agonist behavior for the [Ca2+]i response. The inverse agonists ranitidine and cimetidine more potently inhibit cAMP production in the higher expressing H2-HR line. Histamine also activated both signaling pathways via human H1-HRs highly expressed (Bmax=17 pmol/mg protein) in HEK cells, with a 1000-fold greater potency for [Ca2+]i vs. cAMP responses (pEC50=7.86 and 4.82, respectively). These studies demonstrate a markedly different potency for activation of multiple signaling pathways by H1- and H2-HRs that may contribute to the selectivity of histamine responses in vivo.     

Roles of histamine in regulation of arousal and cognition: functional neuroimaging of histamine H1 receptors in human brain

Brain histamine is involved in a wide range of physiological functions such as regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, arousal, cognition, and memory mainly through interactions with histamine H1 receptors (H1Rs). Neurons producing histamine, histaminergic neurons, are exclusively located in the posterior hypothalamus and transmit histamine to almost all regions of the brain. Histamine H1 antagonists, or antihistamines, often prescribed for treatment of allergic disorders, sometimes induce sleepiness and cognitive deficits. It is understood that the mechanism of such CNS side effects is that antihistamine blocks H1Rs in the brain. The purpose of the present study was to compare the CNS side effects of different antihistamines.Subjective sleepiness was measured using the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) and psychomotor performance was examined by a tachistoscope testing system in healthy, young, Japanese volunteers (16 males, 20-28 yrs.) before and after oral administration of antihistamines such as fexofenadine (FEX) and cetirizine (CET). Additionally, H1R occupancy by antihistamines was examined by PET with 11C-doxepin in 8 volunteers.The results of SSS and psychomotor tests demonstrated that FEX tended to be less sedative than CET though the difference was not statistically significant. PET measurements revealed that no H1Rs in the cerebral cortex were occupied by FEX while about 30% of H1Rs were occupied by CET. In summary, it was confirmed that histamine and H1Rs are involved in maintaining arousal and cognition in humans, and that the severity of clinical symptoms is correlated to the amount of antihistamine that penetrated into the brain.     

Ascorbate enhancement of H1 histamine receptor sensitivity coincides with ascorbate oxidation inhibition by histamine receptors

Ascorbate has previously been shown to enhance both ₁- and ₂-adrenergic activity. This activity is mediated by ascorbate binding to the extracellular domain of the adrenergic receptor, which also decreases the oxidation rate of ascorbate. H1 histamine receptors have extracellular agonist or ascorbate binding sites with strong similarities to _1- and ₂-adrenergic receptors. Physiological concentrations of ascorbate (50 µM) significantly enhanced histamine contractions of rabbit aorta on the lower half of the histamine dose-response curve, increasing contractions of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 µM histamine by two- to threefold. Increases in ascorbate concentration significantly enhanced 0.2 µM histamine (5–500 µM ascorbate) and 0.3 µM histamine (15–500 µM ascorbate) in a dose-dependent manner. Histamine does not measurably oxidize over 20 h in oxygenated PSS at 37°C. Thus the ascorbate enhancement is independent of ascorbate's antioxidant effects. Ascorbate in solution oxidizes rapidly. Transfected histamine receptor membrane suspension with protein concentration at >3.1 µg/ml (56 nM maximum histamine receptor) decreases the oxidation rate of 392 µM ascorbate, and virtually no ascorbate oxidation occurs at >0.0004 mol histamine receptor/mol ascorbate. Histamine receptor membrane had an initial ascorbate oxidation inhibition rate of 0.094 min·µg protein^–1·ml^–1, compared with rates for transfected ANG II membrane (0.055 min·µg protein^–1·ml^–1), untransfected membrane (0.052 min·µg protein^–1·ml^–1), creatine kinase (0.0082 min·µg protein^–1·ml^–1), keyhole limpet hemocyanin (0.00092 min·µg protein^–1·ml^–1), and osmotically lysed aortic rings (0.00057 min·µg wet weight^–1·ml^–1). Ascorbate enhancement of seven-transmembrane-spanning membrane receptor activity occurs in both adrenergic and histaminergic receptors. These receptors may play a significant role in maintaining extracellular ascorbate in a reduced state. molecular complementarity; vitamin C; seven-transmembrane-spanning membrane receptors     

Unexpected Ca2+-mobilization of oxaliplatin via H1 histamine receptors

Oxaliplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug and represents the cornerstone of colorectal cancer therapy, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid. As with many chemotherapeutic agents, its use is associated with a number of side effects, ranging from hypersensitivity reactions to haematological dyscrasias. Oxaliplatin also induces acute and chronic peripheral neuropathy.While it is likely that the haematological side effects are associated with its anti-proliferative effects and with the ability to form DNA adducts, the molecular mechanisms underlying peripheral neuropathy and hypersensitivity reactions are poorly understood, and therefore the choice of adequate supportive therapies is largely empirical.Here we show that an acute low dose oxaliplatin application on DRG neurons is able to induce an increase in intracellular calcium that is dependent on the Histamine 1 receptor (H1). Oxaliplatin-induced intracellular calcium rises are blocked by two selective H1 antagonist, as well as by U73122, a PLC inhibitor, and by 2-APB, a non-specific IP₃ receptor blocker. Moreover, expression of the H1 receptor on HEK293 t cells unmasks an oxaliplatin-induced Ca²⁺-rise. Last, activation of H1 via either histamine or oxaliplatin activates TRPV1 receptors, a mechanism that has been associated with itch. These data, together with literature data that has shown that anti-histamine agents reduce the incidence of oxaliplatin-induced hypersensitivity, may provide a molecular mechanism of this side effect in oncological patients.     

Implication of prostaglandins and histamine H1 and H2 receptors in radiation-induced temperature responses of rats

Exposure of rats to 1-15 Gy gamma radiation (60Co) induced hyperthermia, whereas 20-200 Gy induced hypothermia. Exposure either to the head or to the whole body to 10 Gy induced hyperthermia, while body-only exposure produced hypothermia. This observation indicates that radiation-induced fever is a result of a direct effect on the brain. The hyperthermia due to 10 Gy was significantly attenuated by the pre- or post-treatment with a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin. Hyperthermia was also altered by the central administration of a mu-receptor antagonist naloxone but only at low doses of radiation. These findings suggest that radiation-induced hyperthermia may be mediated through the synthesis and release of prostaglandins in the brain and to a lesser extent to the release of endogenous opioid peptides. The release of histamine acting on H1 and H2 receptors may be involved in radiation-induced hypothermia, since both the H1 receptor antagonist, mepyramine, and H2 receptor antagonist, cimetidine, antagonized the hypothermia. The results of these studies suggest that the release of neurohumoral substances induced by exposure to ionizing radiation is dose dependent and has different consequences on physiological processes such as the regulation of body temperature. Furthermore, the antagonism of radiation-induced hyperthermia by indomethacin may have potential therapeutic implications in the treatment of fever resulting from accidental irradiations.     

Effect of histamine and H1 and H2 receptors antagonists on carbachol-induced wet-dog shakes in rats

Intracerebroventricular administration of carbachol chloride induced a characteristic wet-dog shake response in rats. Histamine did not change the number of wet-dog shakes during a 60 min observation but intensified the number of episodes in the first 30 min of the experiment. Antagonists of H1 (thenalidine and antazoline) and H2 (cimetidine and ranitidine) receptors, attenuated carbachol-induced wet-dog shakes. It may be suggested that inhibition of the central histaminergic structures decreased central cholinergic activity.     

Molecular and cellular analysis of histamine H1 receptors on cultured smooth muscle cells

Histamine is an important mediator of immediate hypersensitivity for both animals and humans. The action of histamine on target tissues is believed to be mediated by specific cell surface receptors, especially H1 and H2 receptors for hypersensitivity and inflammatory reactions, which involve stimulation of smooth muscle contractility, alterations in vascular permeability, and modifications in the activities of macrophages and lymphocytes. Although the nature of histamine receptors in the brain and peripheral tissues has been studied extensively by many laboratories, the molecular mechanism of histamine receptor-mediated reactions is not fully understood, mainly because histamine receptors are incompletely characterized from the biochemical point of view. In previous studies, we have found that the cultured smooth muscle cell line DDT1MF-2, derived from hamster vas deferens, expresses low-affinity histamine H1 receptors and responds biochemically and functionally to H1-specific stimulation (Mitsuhashi and Payan, J Cell Physiol 134:367, 1988). This cell line provides a model for analyzing the biochemical responses of H1 receptor-mediated reactions in peripheral tissues. In this review, we summarized our recent progress in the study of low-affinity H1 receptors on DDT1MF-2 cells.     

The binding of [3H]mepyramine to histamine H1 receptors in monkey brain

Several laboratories have reported ligand binding studies using radioactive histamine H1 antagonists to label the H1 receptors in mammalian brain. We have extended these studies to a detailed examination of the binding of [3H]mepyramine to monkey brain and have shown that the distribution is similar to that in man, with specific binding sites being concentrated in the frontal cortex with relatively low binding to the pons and basal ganglia. The binding shows a single saturable component with a KD of about 1 nM and a Hill plot slope close to unity. These observations are the same for all structures tested. Comparison with data from other laboratories suggests that in this species, the histamine receptor is the same as that in peripheral tissues. From Ki values for various ligands and comparison of KD estimates in other species, the receptor seems to be essentially identical to the H1 receptor in central and peripheral tissues of the guinea pig and also to that in human brain. The rat and possibly the dog have minor differences from the monkey in terms of KD values for [3H]mepyramine binding.     

Brain histamine and histamine H3 receptors following repeated L-histidine administration in rats

In order to assess the importance of the chronic increase in precursor availability on central histaminergic mechanisms in rats, nine male Wistar rats received L-histidine orally at a dose of 1000 mg/kg, twice daily (07.00 h and 19.00 h) for 1 week; 9 rats were used as controls. Brain tissue histamine and tele-methylhistamine levels, as well as plasma histamine concentration were assayed. Binding properties and regional distribution of the autoregulatory histamine H3 receptors in brain were studied with [3H]-R-alpha-methylhistamine receptor binding and autoradiography. In L-histidine loaded rats, tissue histamine levels in cortex, hypothalamus, and rest of the brain were significantly increased by 40%-70%. Histamine concentrations in cerebellum and plasma, and tele-methylhistamine concentrations in cortex and hypothalamus did not change. The binding properties of H3 receptors in cortex were not altered. However, there were changes in the regional distribution of [3H]-R-alpha-methylhistamine binding sites, suggestive of a region-selective up-/down-regulation of histamine H3 receptors or their receptor sub-types. These results imply that following repeated L-histidine administration in the rat (1) there is enhanced synthesis of brain histamine not reflected in its functional release; (2) the excess of histamine is sequestered and stored rather than being metabolized; (3) histamine H(3) receptor binding properties are not altered, whereas receptor density is changed in selected regions. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the neuronal mechanisms controlling histamine synthesis, storage, and release are adaptable and allow the sequestration of the excess of histamine in order to prevent excessively high neuronal activity.     

Characterization of thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptors and histamine H1 receptors in cultured guinea-pig tracheal smooth-muscle cells.

We characterized thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 (TXA2/PGH2) receptors and histamine H1 receptors in Guinea-pig cultured tracheal smooth-muscle cells (TSMC). [3H]SQ 29,548 (a TXA2 antagonist)-binding sites were saturable and a high affinity with a dissociation constant of 6.2 +/- 0.60 nM (mean +/- S.E.) and a receptor density of 46 +/- 4.6 fmol/10(6) cells. [3H]SQ 29548 binding was completely inhibited by TXA2 mimetics or antagonists. Intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in TSMC was increased with U46619 stimulation and the increase was attenuated by TXA2 antagonists, the potencies of which correlated with those inhibiting the activities of the [3H]SQ 29548 binding. [3H]Mepyramine (a H1 antagonist)-binding sites were also present in TSMC. [3H]Mepyramine had a single class of low-affinity-binding sites with a dissociation constant of 2.6 +/- 0.081 microM and a receptor density of 10.6 +/- 0.11 nmol/mg protein. [3H]Mepyramine binding in TSMC membrane was inhibited by H1 antagonists, but not by H2 antagonists. The inhibition constants of mepyramine in TSMC were 910-times lower than those in tracheal membranes. In contrast, the histamine-induced increase in [Ca2+]i in TSMC was inhibited in the presence of low concentrations of H1 antagonists. All these observations provide evidence that TXA2/PGH2 receptors, mepyramine-binding sites and/or H1 receptors are expressed in cultured TSMC.     

Voltage sensitivities and deactivation kinetics of histamine H3 and H4 receptors

Agonist potency at some neurotransmitter receptors has been shown to be regulated by voltage, a mechanism which has been suggested to play a crucial role in the regulation of neurotransmitter release by inhibitory autoreceptors. Likewise, receptor deactivation rates upon agonist removal have been implicated in autoreceptor function. Using G protein-coupled potassium (GIRK) channel activation in Xenopus oocytes as readout of receptor activity, we have investigated the voltage sensitivities and signaling kinetics of the hH₃⁴⁴⁵ and hH₃³⁶⁵ isoforms of the human histamine H₃ receptor, which functions as an inhibitory auto- and heteroreceptor in the nervous system. We have also investigated both the human and the mouse homologues of the related histamine H₄ receptor, which is expressed mainly on hematopoietic cells. We found that the hH₃⁴⁴⁵ receptor is the most sensitive to voltage, whereas the hH₃³⁶⁵ and H₄ receptors are less affected. We further observed a marked difference in response deactivation kinetics between the hH₃⁴⁴⁵ and hH₃³⁶⁵ isoforms, with the hH₃³⁶⁵ isoform being five to six-fold slower than the hH₃⁴⁴⁵ receptor. Finally, using synthetic agonists, we found evidence for agonist-specific voltage sensitivity at the hH₄ receptor. The differences in voltage sensitivities and deactivation kinetics between the hH₃⁴⁴⁵, hH₃³⁶⁵, and H₄ receptors might be relevant to their respective physiological roles.     

Involvement of histamine H1 and H2 receptors in hypothermia induced by ionizing radiation in guinea pigs

Radiation-induced hypothermia was examined in guinea pigs. Exposure to the head alone or whole-body irradiation induced hypothermia, whereas exposure of the body alone produced a small insignificant response. Systemic injection of disodium cromoglycate (a mast cell stabilizer) and cimetidine (H2-receptor antagonist) had no effect on radiation-induced hypothermia, whereas systemic and central administration of mepyramine (H1-receptor antagonist) or central administration of disodium cromoglycate or cimetidine attenuated it, indicating the involvement of central histamine through both H1 and H2 receptors in this response. Serotonin is not involved, since the serotonin antagonist methysergide had no effect on radiation-induced hypothermia. These results indicate that central histaminergic systems may be involved in radiation-induced hypothermia.     

Importance of histamine H2 receptors in restraint-morphine interactions

The effects of the brain-penetrating H₂ antagonist zolantidine (ZOL, 3 mg/Kg, S.c.) were studied on morphine (MOR, 4 mg/Kg, S.c.) antinociception (tail flick test) in the presence and absence of previous restraint stress. Animals were handled for 3 days (to reduce handling stress), restrained for 1 hr or handled on day 4 and tested 24 hrs later. As found previously, restraint enhanced the intensity and duration of MOR antinociception. ZOL potentiated MOR antinociception in handled, non-restrained animals, but inhibited MOR action in restrained animals. In contrast, ZOL had no effects on nociceptive responses in either handled or stressed subjects in the absence of MOR. The data suggest that, in the absence of restraint, brain HA acts at the H₂ receptor to inhibit MOR antinociception. In contrast, when an animal has been previously restrained, HA enhances MOR antinociception. Thus, brain HA appears to mediate the restraintinduced potentiation of MOR antinociception. Taken with previous results, the present findings suggest that in the presence of MOR, brain HA can provide bidirectional modulation of nociception. The direction of the modulation seems to depend upon the stress experience of the animal.     

5-HT1A and histamine H1 receptors in HeLa cells stimulate phosphoinositide hydrolysis and phosphate uptake via distinct G protein pools.

Regulation of phosphate uptake was studied in a HeLa cell line after transfection with DNA encoding the human 5-HT1A receptor. In these cells, 5-HT stimulates sodium-dependent phosphate uptake via protein kinase C activation. Endogenous histamine H1 receptors (739 +/- 20 fmol/mg protein) were identified with [3H]pyrilamine. Histamine (i) stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis (EC50 = 8.6 +/- 4.1 microM), (ii) activated protein kinase C (2.4-fold increase in activity), and (iii) increased phosphate uptake (EC50 = 3.2 +/- 1.8 microM) by increasing maximal transport (Vmax(basal) = 6.2 +/- 0.3 versus Vmax(histamine) = 9.1 +/- 0.4) without changing the affinity of the transport process for phosphate. Prolonged treatment with 16 microM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate completely blocked protein kinase C activation and markedly attenuated the stimulation of phosphate uptake induced by histamine, establishing that 5-HT and histamine stimulate phosphate uptake through the common pathway of protein kinase C activation. The linkages of the histamine H1 and 5-HT1A receptors to G protein pools were assessed in two ways. (i) The stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis, protein kinase C activity, and phosphate uptake associated with histamine were insensitive to pertussis toxin, whereas those associated with 5-HT were very sensitive to pertussis toxin. (ii) The stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis, protein kinase C activity, and phosphate uptake induced by histamine and 5-HT were additive. These findings suggest that distinct receptor types can stimulate phosphoinositide hydrolysis, protein kinase C, and phosphate uptake in an additive fashion through distinct pools of G proteins in a single cell type.     

Characterization of functional histamine H1 receptors on a cultured smooth muscle cell line

Cultured cells of the smooth muscle line DDT1MF-2, which was derived from a hamster vas deferens tumor, expressed histamine H1-type receptors and responded biochemically and functionally to H1-specific stimulation. The H1-receptor antagonist [3H]-pyrilamine bound specifically to 9.7 x 10(6) sites/DDT1MF-2 cell with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 219 nM. The addition of histamine to suspensions of fura-2-loaded DDT1MF-2 cells elicited a rapid, transient, and stimulus concentration-dependent increase in the intracellular concentration of Ca2+ with an EC50 of 3 x 10(-5) M, which demonstrated H1 receptor specificity. Moreover, in order to evaluate in vitro contractile response of individual DDT1MF-2 cells, the degree of intracellular actin polymerization was quantified by a DNase inhibition assay. The percentage of nonpolymerized or G-actin in DDT1MF-2 cells was reduced in a histamine concentration-dependent manner with an EC50 of 1 x 10(-5) M and H1 receptor specificity. Histamine-induced actin polymerization was accompanied by changes in cell shape that were consistent with cellular contraction, as assessed by flow cytometry. The H1-type receptors of cultured DDT1MF-2 cells thus couple histamine stimulation to a variety of functional responses of smooth muscle cells.     

Solubilization, separation, and partial characterization of histamine H1 and H2 receptors from calf thymocyte membranes.

Histamine membrane receptors are defined as either H1 (blocked by diphenhydramine-like antagonists) or H2 (blocked by cimetidine-like agents). We now report the solubilization, separation, and partial characterization of specific H1 and H2 membrane receptors from calf thymocytes. Membrane fragments were incubated with [3H]histamine either alone or with unlabeled histamine, diphenhydramine, or cimetidine. Maximal specific binding occurred with incubation at 37 degrees C for 2 h at a concentration of 5 x 10(-6) M [3H]histamine. Labeled receptors were solubilized from membranes with 0.3 M KCl and 1% Nonidet 40. Chromatography of the solubilized labeled receptors on ion exchange columns revealed two classes of receptor. One class bound to DEAE-cellulose and eluted as a sharp peak at 0.15 M NaCl/Pi. The other bound to phosphocellulose and eluted as a sharp peak at 0.55 M NaCl/Pi. Initial incubation of the membranes in the presence of the H1 receptor antagonist diphenhydramine virtually abolished the DEAE-cellulose peak, while incubation with cimetidine, the H2 receptor antagonist, blocked the phosphocellulose peak. We conclude that H1 and H2 histamine receptors are physically separable and can be defined by their ability to bind to either DEAE-cellulose or phosphocellulose.     

H2 histaminic receptors in rat cerebral cortex. 1. Binding of [3H]histamine

Saturable binding of [3H]histamine in equilibrium with homogenates of rat cerebral cortex reveals Hill coefficients between 0.4 and 1.0, depending upon the conditions. Data from individual experiments are well described assuming one or two classes of sites. Only the sites of higher affinity (KP1 = 3.9 +/- 0.5 nM) are observed when binding is measured by isotopic dilution at a low concentration of the radioligand (less than 1.5 nM) in the presence of magnesium or by varying the concentration of the radioligand. The sites of lower affinity (KP2 = 221 +/- 26 nM) appear during isotopic dilution at higher concentrations of the radioligand or at lower concentrations either upon the addition of guanylyl imidodiphosphate (GMP-PNP) or upon the removal of magnesium. Estimates of the second- and first-order rate constants for association and dissociation of [3H]histamine agree well with KP1. Apparent capacities corresponding to KP1 and KP2 are of the order of 100 ([R1]t) and 1300 pmol/g of protein ([R2]t), respectively. Simple interconversion cannot account for the changes in binding that occur upon adding GMP-PNP or removing magnesium, since the increase in [R2]t exceeds the decrease in [R1]t. Moreover, the apparent amount of high-affinity complex exhibits a biphasic dependence on the concentration of [3H]histamine; an increase at low concentrations is offset by a decrease that occurs at higher concentrations. The latter appears to be positively cooperative and concomitant with formation of the low-affinity complex. These and other observations indicate that the binding of histamine is inconsistent with models commonly invoked to rationalize the binding of agonists to neurohumoral receptors. GMP-PNP and magnesium reciprocally alter capacity at the sites of higher affinity, however, and the reduction caused by GMP-PNP reflects a substantial increase in the rate constant for dissociation at the sites that appear to be lost. The sites labeled by [3H]histamine thus reveal the properties of neurohumoral receptors linked to a nucleotide-specific G/F protein.