FG/FxFG as well as GLFG repeats form a selective permeability barrier with self‐healing properties

The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) controls all nucleo‐cytoplasmic exchange. It is freely permeable for small molecules. Objects larger than ≈30 kDa can efficiently cross this barrier only when bound to nuclear transport receptors (NTRs) that confer translocation‐promoting properties. We had shown earlier that the permeability barrier can be reconstituted in the form of a saturated FG/FxFG repeat hydrogel. We now show that GLFG repeats, the other major FG repeat type, can also form highly selective hydrogels. While supporting massive, reversible importin‐mediated cargo influx, FG/FxFG, GLFG or mixed hydrogels remained firm barriers towards inert objects that lacked nuclear transport signals. This indicates that FG hydrogels immediately reseal behind a translocating species and thus possess ‘self‐healing’ properties. NTRs not only left the barrier intact, they even tightened it against passive influx, pointing to a role for NTRs in establishing and maintaining the permeability barrier of NPCs.     

Systematic analysis of barrier-forming FG hydrogels from Xenopus nuclear pore complexes

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) control the traffic between cell nucleus and cytoplasm. While facilitating translocation of nuclear transport receptors (NTRs) and NTR·cargo complexes, they suppress passive passage of macromolecules ?30 kDa. Previously, we reconstituted the NPC barrier as hydrogels comprising S. cerevisiae FG domains. We now studied FG domains from 10 Xenopus nucleoporins and found that all of them form hydrogels. Related domains with low FG motif density also substantially contribute to the NPC's hydrogel mass. We characterized all these hydrogels and observed the strictest sieving effect for the Nup98‐derived hydrogel. It fully blocks entry of GFP‐sized inert objects, permits facilitated entry of the small NTR NTF2, but arrests importin β‐type NTRs at its surface. O‐GlcNAc modification of the Nup98 FG domain prevented this arrest and allowed also large NTR·cargo complexes to enter. Solid‐state NMR spectroscopy revealed that the O‐GlcNAc‐modified Nup98 gel lacks amyloid‐like β‐structures that dominate the rigid regions in the S. cerevisiae Nsp1 FG hydrogel. This suggests that FG hydrogels can assemble through different structural principles and yet acquire the same NPC‐like permeability.     

The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) maintain a permeability barrier between the nucleus and the cytoplasm through FG-repeat-containing nucleoporins (Nups). We previously proposed a "selective phase model" in which the FG repeats interact with one another to form a sieve-like barrier that can be locally?disrupted by the binding of nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), but not by inert macromolecules, allowing selective passage of NTRs and associated cargo. Here, we provide direct evidence for this model in a physiological context. By using NPCs reconstituted from Xenopus laevis egg extracts, we show that Nup98 is essential for maintaining the permeability barrier. Specifically, the multivalent cohesion between FG repeats is required, including cohesive FG repeats close to the anchorage point to the NPC scaffold. Our data exclude alternative models that are based solely on an interaction between the FG repeats and NTRs and indicate that the barrier is formed by a sieve-like FG hydrogel.     

The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) restrict the nucleocytoplasmic flux of most macromolecules, but permit facilitated passage of nuclear transport receptors and their cargo complexes. We found that a simple hydrophobic interaction column can mimic the selectivity of NPCs surprisingly well and that nuclear transport receptors appear to be the most hydrophobic soluble proteins. This suggests that surface hydrophobicity represents a major sorting criterion of NPCs. The rate of NPC passage of cargo-receptor complexes is, however, not dominated just by properties of the receptors. We found that large cargo domains drastically hinder NPC passage and require more than one receptor molecule for rapid translocation. This argues against a rigid translocation channel and instead suggests that NPC passage involves a partitioning of the entire translocating species into a hydrophobic phase, whereby the receptor:cargo ratio determines the solubility in that permeability barrier. Finally, we show that interfering with hydrophobic interactions causes a reversible collapse of the permeability barrier of NPCs, which is consistent with the assumption that the barrier is formed by phenylalanine-rich nucleoporin repeats that attract each other through hydrophobic interactions.     

Dissociation of nuclear import cargo complexes by the protein Ran: a fluorescence correlation spectroscopy study

In nucleated cells, proteins designed for nuclear import form complexes with soluble nuclear transport receptors prior to translocation across the nuclear envelope. The directionality of transport is due to the asymmetric distribution of the protein Ran, which dissociates import cargo complexes only in its nuclear RanGTP form. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, we have studied the stability of cargo complexes in solution in the presence and in the absence of RanGTP. We find that RanGTP has a higher affinity for the major import receptor, the importin alpha/beta heterodimer, when importin alpha does not carry a cargo, suggesting that some nuclear transport targets might be preferentially released.     

Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) restrict uncontrolled nucleocytoplasmic fluxes of inert macromolecules but permit facilitated translocation of nuclear transport receptors and their cargo complexes. We probed the passive barrier of NPCs and observed sieve‐like properties with a dominating mesh or channel radius of 2.6 nm, which is narrower than proposed earlier. A small fraction of diffusion channels has a wider opening, explaining the very slow passage of larger molecules. The observed dominant passive diameter approximates the distance of adjacent hydrophobic clusters of FG repeats, supporting the model that the barrier is made of FG repeat domains cross‐linked with a spacing of an FG repeat unit length. Wheat germ agglutinin and the dominant‐negative importin β^45‐462 fragment were previously regarded as selective inhibitors of facilitated NPC passage. We now observed that they do not distinguish between the passive and the facilitated mode. Instead, their inhibitory effect correlates with the size of the NPC‐passing molecule. They have little effect on small species, inhibit the passage of green fluorescent protein‐sized objects >10‐fold and virtually block the translocation of larger ones. This suggests that passive and facilitated NPC passage proceed through one and the same permeability barrier.     

The interaction between importin-α and Nup153 promotes importin-α/β-mediated nuclear import

Nuclear transport is mediated by transport factors, including the importin β family members. The directionality of nuclear transport is governed by the asymmetrical distribution of the small GTPase Ran. Of note, importin α/β-mediated import of classical nuclear localization signal (cNLS)--containing cargo is more efficient than other Ran-dependent import pathways that do not require importin α. In this study, we characterized the role of importin α in nuclear transport by examining import efficiencies of cNLS-cargo/importin α/β complexes. We first depleted digitonin-permeabilized semi-intact cells of endogenous importin α and used the cells to show that the interaction between importin α and Nup153--a component of the nuclear pore complex (NPC)--is essential for efficient import of importin β-binding domain containing substrates, but not other cargoes that directly bind to importin β. Moreover, we found that the binding of importin α to Nup153 facilitates cNLS-mediated import, and demonstrated that importin α in import complexes and cargo-free importin α prebound to Nup153 promote efficient import of cNLS-containing proteins. This is the first in vitro study showing that in conjunction with Nup153, importin α contributes to directionally biased exit of cNLS-containing cargo to the nuclear side of NPCs.     

Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin beta concentration

Although many components and reaction steps necessary for bidirectional transport across the nuclear envelope (NE) have been characterized, the mechanism and control of cargo migration through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) remain poorly understood. Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy was used to track the movement of cargos before, during, and after their interactions with NPCs. At low importin β concentrations, about half of the signal-dependent cargos that interacted with an NPC were translocated across the NE, indicating a nuclear import efficiency of ~50%. At high importin β concentrations, the import efficiency increased to ~80% and the transit speed increased approximately sevenfold. The transit speed and import efficiency of a signal-independent cargo was also increased by high importin β concentrations. These results demonstrate that maximum nucleocytoplasmic transport velocities can be modulated by at least ~10-fold by the importin β concentration and therefore suggest a potential mechanism for regulating the speed of cargo traffic across the NE.     

NTF2 mediates nuclear import of Ran.

Importin beta family transport receptors shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and mediate transport of macromolecules through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The interactions between these receptors and their cargoes are regulated by binding RanGTP; all receptors probably exit the nucleus complexed with RanGTP, and so should deplete RanGTP continuously from the nucleus. We describe here the development of an in vitro system to study how nuclear Ran is replenished. Nuclear import of Ran does not rely on simple diffusion as Ran's small size would permit, but instead is stimulated by soluble transport factors. This facilitated import is specific for cytoplasmic RanGDP and employs nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) as the actual carrier. NTF2 binds RanGDP initially to NPCs and probably also mediates translocation of the NTF2-RanGDP complex to the nuclear side of the NPCs. A direct NTF2-RanGDP interaction is crucial for this process, since point mutations that disturb the RanGDP-NTF2 interaction also interfere with Ran import. The subsequent nuclear accumulation of Ran also requires GTP, but not GTP hydrolysis. The release of Ran from NTF2 into the nucleus, and thus the directionality of Ran import, probably involves nucleotide exchange to generate RanGTP, for which NTF2 has no detectable affinity, followed by binding of the RanGTP to an importin beta family transport receptor.     

Conformational variability of nucleo-cytoplasmic transport factors

The transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is largely mediated by a single family of transport factors, the karyopherin or importin beta-like family. Structural and biochemical evidence suggests conformational flexibility of these modular HEAT-repeat proteins is crucial for their regulation. Here we use small angle x-ray scattering to assess the extent of conformational variation within a set of nuclear import and export factors. The study reveals that importin beta, transportin, and the exportin Xpo-t share a similar S-like superhelical conformation in their unbound state. There are no obvious differences in the overall structures that might generally distinguish nuclear export from nuclear import mediators. Two other members of the family, the exportins Cse1 and Xpo1, possess a significantly more globular conformation, indicating that the extended S-like architecture is not a hallmark of all karyopherins. Binding of RanGTP/cargo to importin beta, transportin, and Xpo-t triggers distinct conformational responses, suggesting that even closely related karyopherins employ different mechanisms of conformational regulation and that cargo and nuclear pore-interacting surfaces of the different receptors may be unique.     

Influence of cargo size on Ran and energy requirements for nuclear protein import

Previous work has shown that the transport of some small protein cargoes through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) can occur in vitro in the absence of nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis. We now demonstrate that in the importin alpha/beta and transportin import pathways, efficient in vitro transport of large proteins, in contrast to smaller proteins, requires hydrolyzable GTP and the small GTPase Ran. Morphological and biochemical analysis indicates that the presence of Ran and GTP allows large cargo to efficiently cross central regions of the NPC. We further demonstrate that this function of RanGTP at least partly involves its direct binding to importin beta and transportin. We suggest that RanGTP functions in these pathways to promote the transport of large cargo by enhancing the ability of import complexes to traverse diffusionally restricted areas of the NPC.     

The translocation of transportin–cargo complexes through nuclear pores is independent of both Ran and energy

Active transport between nucleus and cytoplasm proceeds through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and is mediated largely by shuttling transport receptors that use direct RanGTP binding to coordinate loading and unloading of cargo [1], [2], [3], [4]. Import receptors such as importin β or transportin bind their substrates at low RanGTP levels in the cytoplasm and release them upon encountering RanGTP in the nucleus, where a high RanGTP concentration is predicted. This substrate release is, in the case of import by the importin α/β heterodimer, coupled directly to importin β release from the NPCs. If the importin β –RanGTP interaction is prevented, import intermediates arrest at the nuclear side of the NPCs [5], [6]. This arrest makes it difficult to probe directly the Ran and energy requirements of the actual translocation from the cytoplasmic to the nuclear side of the NPC, which immediately precedes substrate release. Here, we have shown that in the case of transportin, dissociation of transportin–substrate complexes is uncoupled from transportin release from NPCs. This allowed us to dissect the requirements of translocation through the NPC, substrate release and transportin recycling. Surprisingly, translocation of transportin–substrate complexes into the nucleus requires neither Ran nor nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). It is only nuclear RanGTP, not GTP hydrolysis, that is needed for dissociation of transportin–substrate complexes and for re-export of transportin to the cytoplasm. GTP hydrolysis is apparently required only to restore the import competence of the re-exported transportin and, thus, for multiple rounds of transportin-dependent import. In addition, we provide evidence that at least one type of substrate can also complete NPC passage mediated by importin β independently of Ran and energy.     

O-GlcNAc modification of nuclear pore complexes accelerates bidirectional transport

Macromolecular transport across the nuclear envelope depends on facilitated diffusion through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). The interior of NPCs contains a permeability barrier made of phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeat domains that selectively facilitates the permeation of cargoes bound to nuclear transport receptors (NTRs). FG-repeat domains in NPCs are a major site of O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification, but the functional role of this modification in nucleocytoplasmic transport is unclear. We developed high-throughput assays based on optogenetic probes to quantify the kinetics of nuclear import and export in living human cells. We found that increasing O-GlcNAc modification of the NPC accelerated NTR-facilitated transport of proteins in both directions, and decreasing modification slowed transport. Superresolution imaging revealed strong enrichment of O-GlcNAc at the FG-repeat barrier. O-GlcNAc modification also accelerated passive permeation of a small, inert protein through NPCs. We conclude that O-GlcNAc modification accelerates nucleocytoplasmic transport by enhancing the nonspecific permeability of the FG-repeat barrier, perhaps by steric inhibition of interactions between FG repeats.     

Exportin 4: a mediator of a novel nuclear export pathway in higher eukaryotes

Transport receptors of the importin beta superfamily account for many of the nuclear import and export events in eukaryotic cells. They mediate translocation through nuclear pore complexes, shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm and co-operate with the RanGTPase system to regulate their interactions with cargo molecules in a compartment-specific manner. We used affinity chromatography on immobilized RanGTP to isolate further candidate nuclear transport receptors and thereby identified exportin 4 as the most distant member of the importin beta family so far. Exportin 4 appears to be conserved amongst higher eukaryotes, but lacks obvious orthologues in yeast. It mediates nuclear export of eIF-5A (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A) and possibly that of other cargoes. The export signal in eIF-5A appears to be complex and to involve the hypusine modification that is unique to eIF-5A. We discuss possible cellular roles for nuclear export of eIF-5A.     

Dissecting the roles of Cse1 and Nup2 in classical NLS‐cargo release in vivo

The importin α/β transport machinery mediates the nuclear import of cargo proteins that bear a classical nuclear localization sequence (cNLS). These cargo proteins are linked to the major nuclear protein import factor, importin‐β, by the importin‐α adapter, after which cargo/carrier complexes enter the nucleus through nuclear pores. In the nucleus, cargo is released by the action of RanGTP and the nuclear pore protein Nup2, after which the importins are recycled to the cytoplasm for further transport cycles. The nuclear export of importin‐α is mediated by Cse1/CAS. Here, we exploit structures of functionally important complexes to identify residues that are critical for these interactions and provide insight into how cycles of protein import and recycling of importin‐α occur in vivo using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae model. We examine how these molecular interactions impact protein localization, cargo import, function and complex formation. We show that reversing the charge of key residues in importin‐α (Arg44) or Cse1 (Asp220) results in loss of function of the respective proteins and impairs complex formation both in vitro and in vivo. To extend these results, we show that basic residues in the Nup2 N‐terminus are required for both Nup2 interaction with importin‐α and Nup2 function. These results provide a more comprehensive mechanistic model of how Cse1, RanGTP and Nup2 function in concert to mediate cNLS‐cargo release in the nucleus.     

Identification of two novel RanGTP-binding proteins belonging to the importin beta superfamily

Nucleo-cytoplasmic transport comprises a large number of distinct pathways, many of which are defined by members of the importin beta superfamily of nuclear transport receptors. These transport receptors all directly interact with RanGTP to modulate the compartment-specific binding of their transport substrates. To identify new members of the importin beta family, we used affinity chromatography on immobilized RanGTP and isolated Ran-binding protein (RanBP) 16 from HeLa cell extracts. RanBP16 and its close human homologue, RanBP17, are distant members of the importin beta family. Like the other members of the transport receptor superfamily, RanBP16 interacts with the nuclear pore complex and is able to enter the nucleus independent of energy and additional nuclear transport receptors.     

Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes

The mechanism of facilitated translocation through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) is only poorly understood. Here, we present a kinetic analysis of the process using various model substrates. We find that the translocation capacity of NPCs is unexpectedly high, with a single NPC allowing a mass flow of nearly 100 MDa/s and rates in the order of 10(3) translocation events per second. Our data further indicate that high affinity interactions between the translocation substrate and NPC components are dispensable for translocation. We propose a 'selective phase model' that could explain how NPCs function as a permeability barrier for inert molecules and yet become selectively permeable for nuclear transport receptors and receptor-cargo complexes.