Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation

The fluorescence of human lymphocyte chromosomes stained with sulfhydryl group-specific fluorochromes is markedly enhanced by a mild near-ultraviolet irradiation pretreatment, indicating breakage of protein disulfide bonds. When metaphase preparations of cells cultured in the presence of BrdU during two cell cycles are irradiated and subsequently stained with the sulfhydryl group-specific fluorescent reagents used in this study, a differential fluorescence of sister chromatids is observed. After staining with the DNA-specific fluorochrome DAPI an opposite pattern of lateral differentiation appears. It can be concluded that the chromatid containing bifilarly BrdU-substituted DNA has a higher content of sulfhydryl groups than the chromatid containing unifilarly BrdU-substituted DNA. This implies a more pronounced effect of breakage of disulfide bonds in the chromatid with the higher degree of BrdU-substitution. BrdU-containing chromosomes pretreated with the mild near-ultraviolet irradiation procedure used by us, do not show any differentiation of sister chromatids after Feulgen staining. Using sulfhydryl group-specific reagents, differential fluorescence of sister chromatids could still be induced by irradiation with near-ultraviolet light after the complete removal of DNA from the chromosomes by incubation with DNase I. Thus, the protein effect of irradiation of BrdU-containing chromosomes takes place independently of what occurs to DNA.Our results indicate that subsequent to the primary alteration of chromatin structure caused by the incorporation of BrdU into DNA, breakage of disulfide bonds of chromosomal proteins might play an important role in bringing about differential staining of sister chromatids, at least for those procedures that use irradiation as a pretreatment or prolonged illumination during microscopic examination.     

Opposite staining effect of two silver-staining techniques on sister chromatids

Opposite differential staining between sister chromatids was obtained by two silver-staining techniques on chromosomes replicated twice in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and pretreated with Hoechst plus black light. Both silver-nitrate and silver-carbonate staining were affected by chemical extraction and enzyme digestion of chromosomal proteins. Prestaining of silver nitrate or silver carbonate also blocked the fluorescences of protein dyes. However, removal of chromosomal DNA affected the silver-carbonate but not the silver-nitrate staining; the fluorescences of DNA dyes were blocked by the prestaining of silver carbonate but not silver nitrate. Chromosomal protein labelling was released only slightly and its relative amount between BrdU bifilarly substituted and unifilarly substituted chromatids was unchanged during pretreatment of Hoechst plus black light. We speculate that chromosomal non-histones are the targets for silver-nitrate stain, and DNA-non-histone complexes for silver-carbonate stain.     

Topographic examination of sister chromatid differential staining by nomarski interference microscopy and scanning electron microscopy

BrdU-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes were treated with a hot Na₂HPO₄ solution and stained with Giemsa to produce sister chromatid differential staining (SCD). The process of SCD was examined with the Nomarski differential interference microscope and the scanning electron microscope. After the Na₂HPO₄ treatment alone, unifilarly BrdU-substituted (TB) chromatids appeared somewhat more severely collapsed than the bifilarly substituted (BB) chromatids. Subsequent Giemsa staining, however, brought about pronounced piling up of the Giemsa dye on the TB-chromatids but not on the BB-ones, causing highly distinct differential Giemsa staining as well as a marked differentiation in surface topography between the sister chromatids. Removal of the Giemsa dye from the differentially Giemsa stained chromosomes resulted in a disappearance of such a pronounced topographic differentiation.     

Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids after extraction with acids

Chromosomes of Chinese hamster strain cells were air-dried on slides after BrdU substitution for two or three rounds of replication. The preparations were treated with 20% PCA at 55 degrees C for 20-30 min, or 5N HCl at 55 degrees C for 15-20 min. After staining with Giemsa, unifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatids stained faintly and bifilarly substituted chromatids stained darkly. Such a pattern of sister chromatid differential staining was confirmed by the examination of metaphase cells grown with BrdU for three rounds of replication.     

DNA lysis is involved in the simplified fluorescence plus Giemsa method for differential staining of sister chromatids

The DNA labelling of the bifilarly 5-bromodeoxyuridine- to-substituted chromatid decreased relative to that of the unifilarly substituted chromatid with increasing duration of HB pretreatment (Hoechst 33258 plus black light at 55° C). Sister chromatid differential staining was detected by Giemsa as well as a DNA-specific dye, ethidium bromide, after 4 s of HB pretreatment. The contrast of sister chromatid differential staining was improved with increased duration of HB pretreatment or by incubation with exonucleases. Hydrogen donors such as cysteamine, cysteine, and L-ascorbic acid inhibited the HB pretreatment, but this inhibition could be overcome by increasing the duration of HB pretreatment.     

Reverse sister chromatid differential staining by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250

A sister chromatid differential staining pattern is observed if chromosomes replicate for two cycles in the presence of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) and are subsequently stained in Hoechst 33258, irradiated with black light, and then stained in Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. In this pattern the chromatids containing DNA that is bifilarly substituted with BrdUrd are darkly stained and the chromatids with DNA that is unifilarly substituted are lightly stained. This staining pattern is the reverse of that found when slides are stained in Hoechst plus Giemsa. Slides stained with either Giemsa or Coomassie Blue can be destained and restained repeatedly with the other stain to alternate the pattern observed.     

Electron microscopy of differentially BrdU-substituted sister chromatids treated with sodium phosphate

Electron microscopy of unstained BrdU-substituted chromosomes treated with 1.0 M NaH₂PO₄ at high pH and high temperature has demonstrated that there is a structural basis for the light microscopic observation of differentially Giemsa-stained unifilarly and bifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatids and the appearance of chromosome dots. At progressively higher treatment temperatures, sequential structural changes occurred in the chromosomes. After treatment with NaH₂PO₄ at 70–80° C, unifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatids were much more electron opaque than bifilarly substituted chromatids, and the overall data suggest that this difference in electron opacity is a result of the preferential extraction of chromosomal DNA from the bifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatids. NaH₂PO₄ treatment of the BrdU-substituted chromosomes at 80–90° ° C resulted in the formation of highly electron opaque spots (dots) on one or both chromatids. Dots first appeared on the electron lucent bifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatid, indicating that the chromatin with the greatest substitution of BrdU in its DNA is most susceptible to dot formation. At a slightly higher temperature, dots also appeared on the unifilarly BrdU-substituted chromatid concomitant with a disappearance of the electron opacity characterizing this chromatid at the lower treatment temperature. The dots may be formed by an extreme reorganization of residual chromatin or by some kind of interaction or reaction between the chromatin and the salts in the incubation medium. G-band regions may serve as focal points for dot formation.     

Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids after substitution with BUdR and incubation in sodium phosphate solution

Chinese hamster strain cells were cultured in the presence of BUdR and air-dried on slides. The chromosome preparations were incubated in 1 M NaH₂PO₄ at 88 °C for 4–6 min and stained with Giemsa. The reverse type of sister chromatid differential staining occurred, in which unifilarly BUdR-substituted chromatids stained faintly and bifilarly substituted chromatids stained darkly. Feulgen reaction performed on the same chromosomes after removing Giemsa stain showed the same type of differential staining.     

Sister chromatid differentiation after in situ detection of ultraviolet-induced DNA breaks under electron microscopy

Summary— Chinese hamster DON cells with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-substituted chromosomes were ultraviolet (UV)-exposed and processed for in situ detection of induced DNA breaks under electron microscopy. For this purpose, UV-induced breaks were amplified by an exonuclease III digestion to obtain single stranded DNA motifs which could hybridize with oligonucleotides of random sequences. These reannealed motifs could be used as primers which were extended by the Klenow polymerase, incorporating biotinylated-dUTP that was detected by a gold-tagged streptavidin. After processing, the chromatid whose DNA was BrdU-substituted in one strand showed a higher electron density than the chromatid substituted in both strands. In contrast, the unifilarly substituted chromatid showed about twice the labelling of DNA breaks as the bifilarly substituted one. This result could be the consequence of a greater loss of chromatin tracts in the bifilarly substituted chromatid, as implied by an X-ray microanalysis which showed that the amount of phosphorous lost by the bifilarly substituted chromatid was higher than that of the unifilarly substituted chromatid.     

Sister chromatid differential staining by direct staining in Na2HPO4-Giemsa solution and the mechanism involved

The direct staining of BrdU-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes in a Na₂HPO₄-Giemsa solution without any pretreatments resulted in a B-dark type SCD in which bifilarly substituted (BB) chromatids stained dark and unifilarly substituted (TB) chromatids stained light. Detailed examinations of the staining process suggested that the Na₂HPO₄ solution acts to collapse chromosomes whereas the Giemsa dye works to reconstruct the collapsed chromosomes, and that during the reconstruction process preferential binding of the Giemsa dye to the BB-chromatids occurs to produce the B-dark SCD. It was revealed that not only the time but the temperature at which chromosome preparations are kept prior to use considerably affect the occurrence of SCD.     

Two opposite types of sister chromatid differential staining in BUdR-substituted chromosomes using tetrasodium salt of EDTA

The direct staining of BUdR-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes in a 4Na-EDTA-Giemsa solution resulted in a B-dark type of sister chromatid differential staining (SCD) in which bifilarly substituted chromatids stained dark. On the other hand, when BUdR-substituted chromosomes were pretreated with a 4Na-EDTA solution and then stained with Giemsa, a B-light type SCD was obtained in which bifilarly substituted chromatids stained light.     

Differential inhibition of sister chromatid condensation induced by 5-azadeoxycytidine in human chromosomes

The deoxycytidine analogue 5-azadeoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) induces differential inhibition of sister chromatid condensation when cells are treated with this substance for two replication cycles, as the subsequent staining of metaphase chromosomes with Giemsa shows. The bifilarly substituted chromatid is dramatically longer than the unifilar one. A percentage of the metaphases treated with 5-azad-C even show a complete undercondensation of the bifilarly substituted chromatid. The optimum conditions for inducing sister chromatid differentiation were determined. No method has been developed as yet to permit enhancement of the differential staining in 5-aza-dC-treated preparations. The interactions between 5-aza-dC and chromosomal DNA as well as the factors involved in the differential staining of sister chromatids are discussed.     

The role of chromosomal proteins in the induction of a differential staining of sister chromatids by light

Summary Fixed chromosomes of human lymphocytes, cultured in the presence of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during two cell cycles, were exposed to near-ultraviolet irradiation, stained with Giemsa, and after destaining, were subjected to either Coomassie Blue or Feulgen-Schiff staining. A differential reaction of sister chromatids was first revealed by Coomassie Blue staining. Differential staining with Giemsa required a longer irradiation time. This appeared to be reduced after the addition of dithiodipyridine to the cells during their last few hours of culture. The differential pattern obtained after Coomassie Blue staining was the inverse of that obtained after Giemsa staining. From these findings we concluded that the induction of sister chromatid differentiation by light in BrdU-substituted DNA containing chromosomes occurs primarily via chromosomal proteins, presumably by differential breakage of their disulphide bonds. The results of the Feulgen-Schiff staining indicated that differential depurination of BrdU-containing DNA could occur, although only after very prolonged irradiation. A faint though distinctly differential Feulgen-Schiff pattern of sister chromated staining, resulting from differential removal of DNA, was observed after photosensitization by specific DNA-binding dyes. Thus, DNA seems to be affected only under more extreme conditions.     

Effects on chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation by incorporation of 5-bromodeoxyuridine into DNA

When fixed metaphase chromosomes of human lymphocytes grown in the presence of BrdUr for two cell cycles were stained with amino group-specific 2-methoxy-2,4-diphenyl-3(2H)furanone (MDPF) after a previous extraction of DNA, sister chromatids showed a light-independent differential staining. Although more faintly differential, a similar staining pattern being just the reverse of the DNA-specific DAPI pattern was obtained without prior removal of DNA. We conclude that the chromatid containing bifilarly BrdUr-substituted DNA has a higher protein content, at least after fixation, than the chromatid containing unifilarly BrdUr-substituted DNA. Possibly, a higher degree of BrdUr substitution leads to a tighter binding of chromosomal proteins. In line with this suggestion we found a markable difference in DNA extractability of BrdUr-containing and normal cytological preparations.     

Nuclease activity in human metaphase chromosomes substituted with 5′-bromodeoxyuridine

Human metaphase chromosomes, substituted with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for one, two or three rounds of replication, were briefly pretreated with ultraviolet light (UV), in the presence of 33258 Hoechst, and subsequently digested with either exonuclease III or S1 nuclease. Pretreatment alone was not sufficient to induce sister chromatid differential staining (SCD), but allowed subsequent digestion with exonuclease III or S1. Such enzymes were found to induce SCD with ethidium bromide, as unifilarly BrdUrd-substituted chromatids (TB) were more resistant than bifilarly substituted chromatids (BB). Other experiments with DNase I or the AluI and HaeIII restriction endonucleases showed that only HaeIII was capable of inducing SCD by attacking BB more than TB chromatids preincubated with UV in the presence of Hoechst. SCD with exonuclease III/S1 nuclease seems to be due to (1) UV-induced DNA debromination occurring twice in BB as opposed to TB chromatids, and (2) alteration of chromatin protein structure occurring to a different extent in differently BrdUrd-substituted chromatids. Our findings with endonucleases, on the contrary, may depend on the capacity of enzymatic cleavage to cancel the different protein alterations induced differentially by UV in TB as opposed to BB chromatids.     

Considerations on the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromosomes

Summary The staining properties of unifilarly bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-substituted chromatids were compared using fluorescent-plus-Giemsa (FPG) staining methods. It was found that the staining intensity of chromatids which had incorporated BrdU in the next to last S-phase is less than that of chromatids whose BrdU-containing strand came from the last cell cycle. Thus, FPG-staining is not a function of the number of BrdU-substituted DNA strands alone. These findings lead to the conclusion that the primary point of action of PFG staining leading to sister chromatid differentiation (SCD) are chromosomal proteins which have been altered in the replication of BrdU-substituted DNA and that the demonstration of the SCD and replication patterns with the same staining procedure is based on different mechanisms.     

On the mechanism of differential giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids

This paper analyses the effect of acid hydrolysis on the differential Giemsa staining of 5-bromo-2deoxyuridine (BrdU) substituted chromatids in human and plant chromosomes, after treatment with a fluorochrome and light. Human lymphocytes and Allium cepa L. root tips were grown in BrdU for two or three cell cycles. Lymphocyte spreadings and meristem squashes were treated with fluorochrome Hoechst 33258, exposed to sunlight, hydrolysed with 5N HCl and stained with Giemsa. This acid hydrolysis improves the differential staining of BrdU substituted and non-substituted chromatin. It also allows the differentiation of sister chromatids with the DNA specific dye azure-A.     

Differential giemsa staining of sister chromatids and the study of sister chromatid exchanges without autoradiography

Chinese hamster ovary cells grown for two rounds of DNA replication in the presence of BrdUrd contain sister chromatids that fluoresce differentially when stained with Hoechst 33258. If such fluorescent treatments are followed by incubation in 2 X SSC or water at 62° C and staining in 3% Giemsa, the chromosomes now contain one dark (unifilarly substituted) chromatid and one light (bifilarly substituted) chromatid, i.e. are harlequinized. These preparations do not fade and can be studied without resorting to fluorescence microscopy. Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE's) are seen with great clarity and resolution; and all the chromosomes in a cell can be scored, which is contrary to the usual experience with autoradiography. It was found that a) the yield of SCE's is dependent upon the concentration of BrdUrd in which the cells are grown and that the maximum number of SCE's that can occur spontaneously is 0.15 per chromosome per division cycle, b) the yield of SCE's doubles if the cells are exposed to visible light that can cause the photolysis of BrdUrd-containing DNA, and c) chromosomes that appear isolabelled in autoradiographic preparations come from observable multiple exchanges and are not the result of the segregation of DNA from a binemic chromosome. Furthermore, the staining patterns obtained in endoreduplicated cells clearly confirm that the polynucleotide strands of the DNA segregate into sister chromatids as though the newly synthesized strands were laid on the outside of the replicating double helix.     

Effects of bromodeoxyuridine substitution on metaphase chromosome structures examined by scanning electron microscopy

Chinese hamster chromosomes were differentially substituted with 50 M 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) to obtain chromosomes with bifilarly and unifilarly substituted (BB-TB) and unifilarly and non-substituted (TB-TT) chromatid constitutions. To avoid the effect of Giemsa staining on the ultrastructure of chromosomes, unstained preparations were exclusively used. When TB-TT chromosomes were prepared with the conventional air-drying method followed by the osmium tetroxide-thiocarbohydrazide (OsO₄-TCH) technique and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the TB-chromatid appeared somewhat more slender and showed more conspicuous spiral structures, thereby appearing more loosened compared to the TT-chromatid. At higher magnifications, however, 30 nm chromatin fibres which were seen to constitute both chromatids showed no discernible differences in dimension between the TT- and TB-chromatids. On the other hand, TB-TT chromosomes specially prepared for SEM without the process of air-drying appeared in their entirety less extended and no spiral configuration was observed even in the TB-chromatid. The TB-chromatid instead appeared rather less loosened than the TT-chromatid whereas thick fibre-like structures which in turn seemed to consist of 30 nm fibres were more easily discernible in the TT-chromatid compared to the TB. Such seemingly contradictory results obtained from the two different preparatory procedures were tentatively explained on the basis of our multiple coiling model (Taniguchi and Takayama 1986).     

DNA alteration induced by ultraviolet light in human metaphase chromosomes substituted with 5′-bromodeoxy uridine: monitoring by monoclonal antibodies to double-stranded and single stranded DNA

Fixed human metaphase chromosomes, whose DNA had been substituted with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for two rounds of replication (TB/BB) or for one round in BrdUrd followed by another round in thymidine (TT/BT), were treated with ultraviolet light (UV), in the presence or in the absence of 33258 Hoechst, to produce sister chromatid differentiation (SCD). Giemsa staining was compared with staining with monoclonal antibodies to double-stranded or single-stranded DNA. We confirmed that UV acts by debrominating BrdUrd-stubstituted DNA but showed that debromination alone cannot explain all our findings. We postulated that UV-induced protein-protein cross-linking, occurring to a different extent in differently BrdUrd-substituted chromatids, may also be invoked in explaining our data. Lastly, the different behaviour of unifilarly substituted TB as opposed to BT chromatids in UV-treated chromosomes, allowed us to hypothesize that such chromatids may differ depending on whether or not newly synthesized DNA is formed on a BrdUrd-containing strand.