The Phosphoproteome of Bloodstream Form Trypanosoma brucei, Causative Agent of African Sleeping Sickness

The protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei is the causative agent of human African sleeping sickness and related animal diseases, and it has over 170 predicted protein kinases. Protein phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism for cellular function that, thus far, has been studied in T.brucei principally through putative kinase mRNA knockdown and observation of the resulting phenotype. However, despite the relatively large kinome of this organism and the demonstrated essentiality of several T. brucei kinases, very few specific phosphorylation sites have been determined in this organism. Using a gel-free, phosphopeptide enrichment-based proteomics approach we performed the first large scale phosphorylation site analyses for T.brucei. Serine, threonine, and tyrosine phosphorylation sites were determined for a cytosolic protein fraction of the bloodstream form of the parasite, resulting in the identification of 491 phosphoproteins based on the identification of 852 unique phosphopeptides and 1204 phosphorylation sites. The phosphoproteins detected in this study are predicted from their genome annotations to participate in a wide variety of biological processes, including signal transduction, processing of DNA and RNA, protein synthesis, and degradation and to a minor extent in metabolic pathways. The analysis of phosphopeptides and phosphorylation sites was facilitated by in-house developed software, and this automated approach was validated by manual annotation of spectra of the kinase subset of proteins. Analysis of the cytosolic bloodstream form T. brucei kinome revealed the presence of 44 phosphorylated protein kinases in our data set that could be classified into the major eukaryotic protein kinase groups by applying a multilevel hidden Markov model library of the kinase catalytic domain. Identification of the kinase phosphorylation sites showed conserved phosphorylation sequence motifs in several kinase activation segments, supporting the view that phosphorylation-based signaling is a general and fundamental regulatory process that extends to this highly divergent lower eukaryote.Phosphorylation by eukaryotic protein kinases (PKs)¹ is the most intensively studied posttranslational modification in eukaryotic cells mainly because reversible phosphorylation regulates almost every cellular process (1). PKs make up one of the largest protein superfamilies, comprising the protein-serine/threonine kinases and protein-tyrosine kinases (2).Knowledge of the fundamental role of protein kinases for cell survival in multicellular organisms has led to functional studies of this enzyme class in parasitic protozoa to search for alternative drug targets to treat tropical diseases (3). Trypanosoma brucei causes human African trypanosomiasis (also known as African sleeping sickness) and is responsible for ∼30,000 deaths per annum (4). Initial bioinformatics analysis of the T. brucei genome revealed the presence of 156 conventional protein kinases (ePks) and 20 atypical protein kinases (aPKs) (5). Our characterization of the T. brucei genome using a multilevel hidden Markov model (HMM) library of the kinase catalytic domain (6) followed by manual curation identified 170 ePKs and 12 aPKs.Over the past few years, research on T. brucei protein kinases has largely focused on cell cycle-regulating enzymes because of their potential as targets for African sleeping sickness (3, 7). Indeed several protein kinases have been shown to be essential for the organism (8–12). Most of the above mentioned protein kinases were characterized using techniques such as RNA interference, overexpression of the kinase and/or a kinase-dead version, in vitro and in vivo kinase assays, and immunofluorescence microscopy. However, despite these encouraging investigations, the literature for T. brucei proteins with a predicted role in signal transduction lacks information about their in vivo phosphorylation sites. Knowledge of protein phosphorylation sites, however, is crucial for a complete functional characterization of protein kinases and kinase-substrate relationships (1, 13).At the start of this study, only seven phosphorylation sites had been mapped in any of the trypanosomatids: Mehlert et al. (14) had found that six of seven threonine residues of the Gly-Pro-Glu-Glu-Thr repeat-procyclin are phosphorylated using MALDI mass spectrometry, and da Cunha et al. (15) had determined one phosphorylation site at Ser¹² of Trypanosoma cruzi histone H1 protein by electrospray MS. Over the past few years phosphoproteome studies in other organisms using phosphopeptide enrichment in combination with high accuracy mass spectrometry have revealed thousands of novel protein phosphorylation sites and given new insights into the extent and function of this posttranslational modification (16–20).In this study, we used a gel-free peptide-based phosphoproteomics approach to identify 491 trypanosomal phosphoproteins and, where possible, their precise phosphorylation sites. In addition to phosphorylation on serine and threonine residues, we identified several phosphorylated tyrosine residues in T. brucei proteins despite the lack of conventional tyrosine kinases in the T. brucei genome (5). Furthermore phosphorylation in the activation segment of protein kinases was found to be conserved in T. brucei, suggesting that at least some signaling pathways described in other eukaryotes are conserved in this ancient and highly divergent eukaryote.     

Phosphoproteomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044 Reveals a Tight Link between Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Virulence

Encapsulated Klebsiella pneumoniae is the predominant causative agent of pyogenic liver abscess, an emerging infectious disease that often complicates metastatic meningitis or endophthalmitis. The capsular polysaccharide on K. pneumoniae surface was determined as the key to virulence. Although the regulation of capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis is largely unclear, it was found that protein-tyrosine kinases and phosphatases are involved. Therefore, the identification and characterization of such kinases, phosphatases, and their substrates would advance our knowledge of the underlying mechanism in capsule formation and could contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies. Here, we analyzed the phosphoproteome of K. pneumoniae NTUH-K2044 with a shotgun approach and identified 117 unique phosphopeptides along with 93 in vivo phosphorylated sites corresponding to 81 proteins. Interestingly, three of the identified tyrosine phosphorylated proteins, namely protein-tyrosine kinase (Wzc), phosphomannomutase (ManB), and undecaprenyl-phosphate glycosyltransferase (WcaJ), were found to be distributed in the cps locus and thus were speculated to be involved in the converging signal transduction of capsule biosynthesis. Consequently, we decided to focus on the lesser studied ManB and WcaJ for mutation analysis. The capsular polysaccharides of WcaJ mutant (WcaJY5F) were dramatically reduced quantitatively, and the LD₅₀ increased by 200-fold in a mouse peritonitis model compared with the wild-type strain. However, the capsular polysaccharides of ManB mutant (ManBY26F) showed no difference in quantity, and the LD₅₀ increased by merely 6-fold in mice test. Our study provided a clear trend that WcaJ tyrosine phosphorylation can regulate the biosynthesis of capsular polysaccharides and result in the pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae NTUH-K2044.Protein phosphorylation is one of the most biologically relevant and ubiquitous post-translational modifications in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. It is best known that protein phosphorylation is a reversible enzyme-catalyzed process that is controlled by various kinases and phosphatases. The aberrant functions often result in irregular protein phosphorylation and ultimately lead to serious disease states such as malignant transformation, immune disorders, and pathogenic infections in mammals (1, 2). Recently, accumulating evidences suggest that Ser/Thr/Tyr phosphorylations also contribute to regulate a diverse range of cellular responses and physiological processes in prokaryotes (1). Among them, tyrosine phosphorylation in encapsulated bacteria has been discovered to play key roles in capsular polysaccharide (CPS1; K antigen) biosynthesis, which leads to virulence (3, 4). This thick layer of exopolysaccharide on many pathogenic bacteria can act as a physical boundary to evade phagocytosis and complement-mediated killing and further inhibit complement activation of the host (1, 5, 6).In 1996, Acinetobacter johnsonii protein-tyrosine kinase (Ptk) was first discovered and categorized under the bacterial protein-tyrosine kinase (BY-kinase) family (1, 7, 8). Shortly after, its function in bacterial exopolysaccharide production and transport was characterized (1, 7, 8). From then on, many more bacterial tyrosine kinases such as Wzc of Escherichia coli (1, 9) and EpsB of Pseudomonas solanacearum (10, 11) were found to possess this conserved property; deletion of such tyrosine kinases will result in the loss of exopolysaccharide production (12). Therefore, several experiments were conducted to investigate the role of the downstream substrates of the tyrosine kinases in different strains of bacteria, and some targeted proteins were found to participate in the exopolysaccharide anabolism (13, 14). These findings demonstrated a direct relationship between bacterial tyrosine phosphorylation and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis that was directly reflected in the strain virulence.In the past, the functional roles of the critical components involved in protein phosphorylation were defined by basic biochemical and genetic approaches (1). However, there exists a salient gap between the growing number of identified protein-tyrosine kinases/phosphatases and the relative paucity of protein substrates characterized to date. Genomic sequence analyses and advanced high resolution/high accuracy MS systems with vastly improved phosphopeptide enrichment strategies are among the two key enabling technologies that allow a high efficiency identification of the scarcely detectable site-specific phosphorylations in bacterial systems (15). Mann et al. (16) were the first to initiate a systematic study of the phosphoproteome of B. subtilis in 2007 followed by similar site-specific phosphoproteomics analyses of E. coli (17), Lactococcus lactis (18), and Halobacterium salinarum (19). These pioneering works have since set the foundation in bacterial phosphoproteomics but have not been specifically carried out to address a particular biological issue of causal relevance to virulence or pathogenesis.Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative, non-motile, facultative anaerobic, and rod-shaped bacterium. It is commonly found in water and soil (20) as well as on plants (21) and mucosal surfaces of mammals, such as human, horse, and swine (22, 23). It was demonstrated that CPS on the surface of K. pneumoniae is the prime factor of virulence and toxicity in causing pyogenic liver abscess (PLA), a common intra-abdominal infection with a high 10–30% mortality rate worldwide (24–29). There are also variations in virulence in regard to different capsular serotypes; K1 and K2 were found to be especially pathogenic in causing PLA in a mouse model (30) compared with other serotypes, which show little or no effect (31–34). The K. pneumoniae NTUH-K2044 (K2044) strain, encapsulated with K1 antigen (35), was isolated from clinical K. pneumoniae liver abscess patients. It has become an important emerging pathogen (36) because it usually complicates metastatic septic endophthalmitis and irreversible central nervous system infections independent of host underlying diseases (30, 34). The transmission rate is high (37), and it often rapidly leads to outbreaks of community-acquired infections, such as bacteremia, nosocomial pneumonia, and sepsis, common in immunocompromised individuals (38).In this study, we wanted to prove that the biosynthesis of CPS is mediated through tyrosine phosphorylation of a subset of proteins. An MS-based systematic phosphoproteomics analysis was conducted on K2044 to identify tyrosine phosphorylated proteins that are also associated with CPS biosynthesis. We further validated the relationship between tyrosine phosphorylation on those proteins and virulence of K2044 by site-directed mutagenesis, CPS quantification, serum killing, and mouse lethality assay.     

Identification of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1 (ERK1) Direct Substrates using Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics

Kinase mediated phosphorylation signaling is extensively involved in cellular functions and human diseases, and unraveling phosphorylation networks requires the identification of substrates targeted by kinases, which has remained challenging. We report here a novel proteomic strategy to identify the specificity and direct substrates of kinases by coupling phosphoproteomics with a sensitive stable isotope labeled kinase reaction. A whole cell extract was moderately dephosphorylated and subjected to in vitro kinase reaction under the condition in which ¹⁸O-ATP is the phosphate donor. The phosphorylated proteins are then isolated and identified by mass spectrometry, in which the heavy phosphate (+85.979 Da) labeled phosphopeptides reveal the kinase specificity. The in vitro phosphorylated proteins with heavy phosphates are further overlapped with in vivo kinase-dependent phosphoproteins for the identification of direct substrates with high confidence. The strategy allowed us to identify 46 phosphorylation sites on 38 direct substrates of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1, including multiple known substrates and novel substrates, highlighting the ability of this high throughput method for direct kinase substrate screening.Protein phosphorylation regulates almost all aspects of cell life, such as cell cycle, migration, and apoptosis (1), and deregulation of protein phosphorylation is one of the most frequent causes or consequences of human diseases including cancers, diabetes, and immune disorders (2). Up till now, however, known substrates are far from saturation for the majority of protein kinases (3); thus, mapping comprehensive kinase-substrate relationships is essential to understanding biological mechanisms and uncovering new drug targets (4).Accompanied with advances of high-speed and high-resolution mass spectrometry, the technique of kinase substrate screening using proteomic strategy is quickly evolving (5–7). Mass spectrometry has been extensively used for kinase-substrate interaction mapping (8) and global phosphorylation profiling (9). Although thousands of phosphorylation sites have been detected, complex phosphorylation cascade and crosstalk between pathways make it difficult for large-scale phosphoproteomics to reveal direct relationships between protein kinases and their substrates (10, 11). Extensive statistics, bioinformatics, and downstream biochemical assays are mandatory for the substrate verification (12, 13). Another strategy uses purified, active kinases to phosphorylate cell extracts in vitro, followed by mass spectrometric analysis to identify phosphoproteins. This approach inevitably faces the major challenge of separating real sites phosphorylated by target kinase and the phosphorylation triggered by endogenous kinases from cell lysates (14). Analog-sensitive kinase allele (15) overcomes the issue by utilizing the engineered kinase that can exclusively take a bulky-ATP analog under the reaction condition. Analog-sensitive kinase allele has been coupled with γ-thiophosphate analog ATP to facilitate the mass spectrometric analysis (16–18).We have introduced kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics (KALIP)¹ to link the in vitro substrate identification and physiological phosphorylation events together in a high throughput manner (19, 20). The strategy, however, has only been applied to identify direct substrates of tyrosine kinases. In this study, we expanded the application of KALIP to serine/threonine kinases by introducing a quantitative strategy termed Stable Isotope Labeled Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (siKALIP). The method was applied to identify direct substrates of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1), a serine/threonine kinase acting as an essential component of the Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathway (21). A defect in the MAP/ERK pathway causes uncontrolled growth, which likely leads to cancer (22) and other diseases (23–25). ERK1 can be activated by growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and nerve growth factor (NGF) (26). Upon stimulation, ERK1 phosphorylates hundreds of substrates in various cellular compartments including cytoplasm, nucleus, and membrane (27). Among 38 ERK1 direct substrates identified by siKALIP, more than one third are previously discovered by classical molecular biology approaches, highlighting high specificity and sensitivity of the strategy. The results also support the hypothesis that ERK1 plays complex roles in multiple pathways that are essential for the cell growth regulation.     

Quantitative Site-specific Phosphorylation Dynamics of Human Protein Kinases during Mitotic Progression

Reversible protein phosphorylation is a key regulatory mechanism of mitotic progression. Importantly, protein kinases themselves are also regulated by phosphorylation-dephosphorylation processes; hence, phosphorylation dynamics of kinases hold a wealth of information about phosphorylation networks. Here, we investigated the site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of human kinases during mitosis using synchronization of HeLa suspension cells, kinase enrichment, and high resolution mass spectrometry. In biological triplicate analyses, we identified 206 protein kinases and more than 900 protein kinase phosphorylation sites, including 61 phosphorylation sites on activation segments, and quantified their relative abundances across three specific mitotic stages. Around 25% of the kinase phosphorylation site ratios were found to be changed by at least 50% during mitotic progression. Further network analysis of jointly regulated kinase groups suggested that Cyclin-dependent kinase- and mitogen-activated kinase-centered interaction networks are coordinately down- and up-regulated in late mitosis, respectively. Importantly, our data cover most of the already known mitotic kinases and, moreover, identify attractive candidates for future studies of phosphorylation-based mitotic signaling. Thus, the results of this study provide a valuable resource for cell biologists and provide insight into the system properties of the mitotic phosphokinome.Reversible phosphorylation is a ubiquitous posttranslational protein modification that is involved in the regulation of almost all biological processes (1–3). In human, 518 protein kinases have been identified in the genome that phosphorylate the majority of cellular proteins and increase the diversity of the proteome by severalfold (4). Addition of a phosphate group to a protein can alter its structural, catalytic, and functional properties; hence, kinases require tight regulation to avoid unspecific phosphorylation, which can be deleterious to cells (5–7). As a result, cells use a variety of mechanisms to ensure proper regulation of kinase activities (8). Importantly, most kinases are also in turn regulated through autophosphorylation and phosphorylation by other kinases, thus generating complex phosphorylation networks. In particular, phosphorylation on activation segments is a common mechanism to modulate kinase activities (9–11), but additional phosphorylation sites are also frequently required for fine tuning of kinase localizations and functions (12). Some kinases contain phosphopeptide binding domains that recognize prephosphorylated sites on other kinases, resulting in processive phosphorylation and/or targeting of kinases to distinct cellular locations (13–16). Because such priming phosphorylation events depend on the activities of the priming kinases, these motifs act as conditional docking sites and restrict the interaction with docking kinases to a particular point in time and physiological state. In addition, phosphorylation sites may act through combinatorial mechanisms or through cross-talk with other posttranslational modifications (PTMs)¹ (17, 18), thus further increasing the complexity of kinase regulatory networks.Regulation of kinases is of particular interest in mitosis as most of the mitotic events are regulated by reversible protein phosphorylation (19). During mitosis, error-free segregation of sister chromatids into the two daughter cells is essential to ensure genomic stability. Physically, this process is carried out by the mitotic spindle, a highly dynamic microtubule-based structure. After entry into mitosis, the major microtubule-organizing centers in animal cells, the centrosomes, start to increase microtubule nucleation and move to opposite poles of the cell. Throughout prometaphase, microtubules emanating from centrosomes are captured by kinetochores, protein complexes assembled on centromeric chromosomal DNA. This eventually leads to the alignment of all chromosomes in a metaphase plate. Because proper bipolar attachment of chromosomes to spindle microtubules is essential for the correct segregation of chromosomes, this critical step is monitored by a signaling pathway known as the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) (20). This checkpoint is silenced only after all chromosomes have attached to the spindle in a bioriented fashion, resulting in the synchronous segregation of sister chromatids during anaphase. Simultaneously, a so-called central spindle is formed between the separating chromatids, and the formation of a contractile ring initiates cytokinesis. Finally, in telophase, the chromosomes decondense and reassemble into nuclei, whereas remnants of the central spindle form the midbody, marking the site of abscission. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1), an evolutionarily conserved master mitotic kinase, is activated prior to mitosis and initiates most of the mitotic events. Cdk1 works in close association with other essential mitotic kinases such as Plk1, Aurora A, and Aurora B for the regulation of mitotic progression (19, 21–24). Plk1 and Aurora kinases dynamically localize to different subcellular locations to perform multiple functions during mitosis and are phosphorylated at several conserved sites. Although little is known about the precise roles of these phosphorylation sites, emerging data indicate that they are involved in regulating localization-specific functions (25, 26). Furthermore, the kinases Bub1, BubR1, and TTK (Mps1) and kinases of the Nek family play important roles in maintaining the fidelity and robustness of mitosis (19). Recently, a genome-wide RNA-mediated interference screen identified M phase phenotypes for many kinases that have not previously been implicated in cell cycle functions, indicating that additional kinases have important mitotic functions (27).Although protein phosphorylation plays a pivotal role in the regulation of cellular networks, many phosphorylation events remain undiscovered mainly because of technical limitations (28). The advent of mass spectrometry-based proteomics along with developments in phosphopeptide enrichment methods has enabled large scale global phosphoproteomics studies (29, 30). However, the number of phosphorylation sites identified on kinases is limited compared with other proteins because of their frequently low expression levels. To overcome this problem, small inhibitor-based kinase enrichment strategies were developed, resulting in the identification of more than 200 kinases from HeLa cell lysates (31, 32). This method was also used recently to compare the phosphokinomes during S phase and M phase of the cell cycle, resulting in the identification of several hundreds of M phase-specific kinase phosphorylation sites (31). In the present study, we address the dynamics of the phosphokinome during mitotic progression using large scale cell synchronization at three distinct mitotic stages, small inhibitor-based kinase enrichment, and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative mass spectrometry. Thus, we determined the mitotic phosphorylation dynamics of more than 900 kinase phosphorylation sites and identified distinctly regulated kinase interaction networks. Our results provide a valuable resource for the dynamics of the kinome during mitotic progression and give insight into the system properties of kinase interaction networks.     

Phosphoproteome Analysis Reveals Regulatory Sites in Major Pathways of Cardiac Mitochondria

Mitochondrial functions are dynamically regulated in the heart. In particular, protein phosphorylation has been shown to be a key mechanism modulating mitochondrial function in diverse cardiovascular phenotypes. However, site-specific phosphorylation information remains scarce for this organ. Accordingly, we performed a comprehensive characterization of murine cardiac mitochondrial phosphoproteome in the context of mitochondrial functional pathways. A platform using the complementary fragmentation technologies of collision-induced dissociation (CID) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) demonstrated successful identification of a total of 236 phosphorylation sites in the murine heart; 210 of these sites were novel. These 236 sites were mapped to 181 phosphoproteins and 203 phosphopeptides. Among those identified, 45 phosphorylation sites were captured only by CID, whereas 185 phosphorylation sites, including a novel modification on ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase protein 1 (Ser-212), were identified only by ETD, underscoring the advantage of a combined CID and ETD approach. The biological significance of the cardiac mitochondrial phosphoproteome was evaluated. Our investigations illustrated key regulatory sites in murine cardiac mitochondrial pathways as targets of phosphorylation regulation, including components of the electron transport chain (ETC) complexes and enzymes involved in metabolic pathways (e.g. tricarboxylic acid cycle). Furthermore, calcium overload injured cardiac mitochondrial ETC function, whereas enhanced phosphorylation of ETC via application of phosphatase inhibitors restored calcium-attenuated ETC complex I and complex III activities, demonstrating positive regulation of ETC function by phosphorylation. Moreover, in silico analyses of the identified phosphopeptide motifs illuminated the molecular nature of participating kinases, which included several known mitochondrial kinases (e.g. pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase) as well as kinases whose mitochondrial location was not previously appreciated (e.g. Src). In conclusion, the phosphorylation events defined herein advance our understanding of cardiac mitochondrial biology, facilitating the integration of the still fragmentary knowledge about mitochondrial signaling networks, metabolic pathways, and intrinsic mechanisms of functional regulation in the heart.Mitochondria are the source of energy to sustain life. In addition to their evolutionary origin as an energy-producing organelle, their functionality has integrated into every aspect of life, including the cell cycle, ROS¹ production, apoptosis, and ion balance (1, 2). Our understanding of mitochondrial biology is still growing. Several systems biology approaches have been dedicated to exploring the molecular infrastructure and dynamics of the functional versatility associated with this organelle (3–5).To meet tissue-specific functional demands, mitochondria acquire heterogeneous properties in individual organs, a first statement of their plasticity in function and proteome composition (1, 6). The heterogeneity is evident even in an individual cardiomyocyte (7). A catalogue of the cardiac mitochondrial proteome is emerging via a joint effort (3–5). The dynamics of the mitochondrial proteome manifest at multiple levels, including post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation. Our investigative goal is to decode this organellar proteome and its post-translational modification in a biological and functional context. In cardiomyocytes, mitochondria are also constantly exposed to fluctuation in energy demands and in ionic conditions. The capacity of mitochondria to cope with such a dynamic environment is essential for the functional role of mitochondria in normal and disease phenotypes (8–10). Unique protein features enabling the mitochondrial proteome to adapt to these biological changes can be interrogated by proteomics tools (10–12). Protein phosphorylation as a rapid and reversible chemical event is an integral component of these protein features (12–14).It has been estimated that one-third of cellular proteins exist in a phosphorylated state at least one time in their lifetime (15). However, only a handful of phosphorylation events have been identified to tune mitochondrial functionality (13, 14, 16) despite the fact that the first demonstration of phosphorylation was reported on a mitochondrial protein more than 5 decades ago (17). Kinases and phosphatases comprise nearly 3% of the human genome (18, 19). In mitochondria, ∼30 kinases and phosphatases have been identified thus far within the expected organellar proteome of a few thousand (3–5, 16). The number of identified mitochondrial phosphoproteins is far below one-third of its proteome size (20). Thus, it appears that the current pool of reported phosphoproteins represents only a small fraction of the anticipated mitochondrial phosphoproteome. The seminal studies from several groups (12–14, 16) demonstrated the prevalence as well as the dynamic nature of phosphorylation in cardiac mitochondria, suggesting that obtaining a comprehensive map of the mitochondrial phosphoproteome is feasible.In this study, we took a systematic approach to tackle the phosphorylation of murine cardiac mitochondrial pathways. We applied the unique strengths of both electron transfer dissociation (ETD) and collision-induced dissociation (CID) LC-MS/MS to screen phosphorylation events in a site-specific fashion. A total of 236 phosphorylation sites in 203 unique phosphopeptides were identified and mapped to 181 phosphoproteins. Novel phosphorylation modifications were discovered in diverse pathways of mitochondrial biology, including ion balance, proteolysis, and apoptosis. Consistent with the role of mitochondria as the major source of energy production under delicate control, metabolic pathways claimed one-third of phosphorylation sites captured in this analysis. To study molecular players steering mitochondrial phosphorylation, we probed the effects of calcium loading on phosphorylation. In addition, a number of kinases with previously unappreciated mitochondrial residence are suggested as potential players modulating mitochondrial pathways. Taken together, the cohort of novel phosphorylation events discovered in this study constitutes an essential step toward the full delineation of the cardiac mitochondrial phosphoproteome.     

Use of Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Analysis to Elucidate the Mechanisms of Phospho-priming and Auto-activation of the Checkpoint Kinase Rad53 in Vivo

The cell cycle checkpoint kinases play central roles in the genome maintenance of eukaryotes. Activation of the yeast checkpoint kinase Rad53 involves Rad9 or Mrc1 adaptor-mediated phospho-priming by Mec1 kinase, followed by auto-activating phosphorylation within its activation loop. However, the mechanisms by which these adaptors regulate priming phosphorylation of specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remain poorly understood. Here we used quantitative mass spectrometry to delineate the stepwise phosphorylation events in the activation of endogenous Rad53 in response to S phase alkylation DNA damage, and we show that the two Rad9 and Mrc1 adaptors, the four N-terminal Mec1-target TQ sites of Rad53 (Rad53-SCD1), and Rad53-FHA2 coordinate intimately for optimal priming phosphorylation to support substantial Rad53 auto-activation. Rad9 or Mrc1 alone can mediate surprisingly similar Mec1 target site phosphorylation patterns of Rad53, including previously undetected tri- and tetraphosphorylation of Rad53-SCD1. Reducing the number of TQ motifs turns the SCD1 into a proportionally poorer Mec1 target, which then requires the presence of both Mrc1 and Rad9 for sufficient priming and auto-activation. The phosphothreonine-interacting Rad53-FHA domains, particularly FHA2, regulate phospho-priming by interacting with the checkpoint mediators but do not seem to play a major role in the phospho-SCD1-dependent auto-activation step. Finally, mutation of all four SCD1 TQ motifs greatly reduces Rad53 activation but does not eliminate it, and residual Rad53 activity in this mutant is dependent on Rad9 but not Mrc1. Altogether, our results provide a paradigm for how phosphorylation site clusters and checkpoint mediators can be involved in the regulation of signaling relay in protein kinase cascades in vivo and elucidate an SCD1-independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism through the Rad9 pathway. The work also demonstrates the power of mass spectrometry for in-depth analyses of molecular mechanisms in cellular signaling in vivo.Eukaryotic cells are most vulnerable to exogenous DNA-damaging agents during the S phase of the cell cycle, when unprogrammed DNA lesions interfere with the tightly choreographed DNA replication process. DNA damage during this phase leads to the activation of two overlapping checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the DNA replication checkpoint and the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint (1, 2). Phospho-priming for auto-activation of the central checkpoint kinase Rad53 by the upstream kinase Mec1/Tel1 depends on Mrc1 as an adaptor in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway and Rad9 as an adaptor in the DNA damage checkpoint pathway (3–10). Rad53, a well-accepted model system for studying the function and regulation of Chk2-like kinases, contains two forkhead-associated (FHA)¹ domains (FHA1 and -2) and two SQ/TQ cluster domains (SCD1 and -2) enriched in Mec1/Tel1-target phosphorylation sites (11–13).Mrc1 normally is a replisome component that functionally couples DNA Pol ε with Cdc45 and MCM helicase during replication fork progression (14, 15). As the replication forks are stalled by replication stress, the recruited checkpoint sensor kinase Mec1 phosphorylates the SCD of Mrc1, which abolishes its N-terminal interaction with Pol ε and enables Mrc1 to recruit Rad53 and promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 as an initial step in the activation of Rad53 in the Mrc1 branch (6, 14, 16). Alanine substitution of all Mec1 target sites of Mrc1 (designated the mrc1-AQ allele) has been shown to selectively disable its checkpoint function for Rad53 activation without affecting its DNA replication functions (4). In response to DNA damage, Rad9 is able to associate with damaged chromatin via its BRCT and Tudor domains, which tether it to Ser129-phosphorylated histone H2A (γH2A) and Lys79-methylated histone H3, respectively (17, 18). Alternatively, the recruitment of Rad9 onto damaged DNA could also be facilitated by its phosphorylation by CDK1, which enables the specific interaction of Rad9 with Dpb11, allowing the formation of the ternary complex of Dpb11, Mec1, and Rad9 (19, 20). Similar to Mrc1, Mec1 activates the adaptor function of Rad9 by phosphorylation of its SCD, which then binds to the Rad53-FHA domains to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 (3, 5, 10).Beyond serving as scaffolds to recruit Rad53, Mrc1 and Rad9 have been shown to promote Rad53 phosphorylation by Mec1 in a dose-dependent manner in vitro (3, 16), underlining their adaptor role to enhance the enzyme–substrate (Mec1–Rad53) interaction. However, how they can specifically regulate the priming phosphorylation at specific sites and how this then leads to Rad53 activation remains poorly understood. Finally, hyperphosphorylated Rad9 has also been shown to catalyze the auto-phosphorylation of recombinant Rad53 (21), but it remains to be examined whether and how this occurs in vivo.The activation of SCD-FHA containing kinases such as human Chk2 and fission yeast Cds1 has been suggested to involve a two-step phosphorylation process: first, SCD phosphorylation by an ATM/ATR-like kinase leads to intermolecular binding to the FHA domain of another Chk2/Cds1 monomer, which then results in dimerization/oligomerization-dependent auto-phosphorylation within the kinase activation loop (22–26). In addition to the characteristic N-terminal SCD-FHA module of Chk2-like kinases, Rad53 contains another SCD2-FHA2 module C-terminal to its kinase domain. Similar to its orthologues, Rad53 activation has been proposed to depend on SCD1 phosphorylation (but not SCD2 phosphorylation) and partially redundant functions of the two FHA domains (9, 27–29). However, although Rad53-FHA1 can interact with SCD1 in a phospho-threonine (pT)-dependent manner in vitro (9, 28), it appears to be required for Rad53 activation only in G2/M-arrested cells (27, 29). In contrast, the FHA2 domain, which seems to be more important overall for Rad53 activation, does not appreciably bind phospho-SCD1 peptides in vitro (27, 28). Thus, the mechanisms by which Mrc1, Rad9, SCD1 phosphorylation, and FHA domains interact during checkpoint-dependent Rad53 priming and auto-activation remain to be elucidated.Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis has revolutionized the functional analysis of cellular signaling pathways, including site-specific phosphorylation events of key signaling molecules (30–33), but an important caveat is that MS studies often involve protein tags or nonphysiological expression levels that can interfere with normal protein functions. For example, the integration of a triple HA tag into the endogenous RAD53 gene locus has been shown to reduce Rad53 protein levels, resulting in significantly altered checkpoint activity (34). In this study we used quantitative MS analyses to dissect the stepwise phosphorylation events of endogenous, untagged Rad53 in response to MMS-induced alkylation DNA damage and replication stress during the S phase. Together with functional analyses, our results delineate how the two Mec1 adaptors Rad9 and Mrc1 can coordinate with the four SCD1 priming sites (T5, T8, T12, and T15) to regulate the phospho-priming of Rad53 by Mec1. In addition, an SCD1-priming independent Rad53 auto-activation mechanism and the specific roles of the FHA domains during Rad53 hyperphosphorylation are also elucidated in this work.     

Semaphorin3A Signaling Mediated by Fyn-dependent Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Collapsin Response Mediator Protein 2 at Tyrosine 32

Collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2) is an intracellular protein that mediates signaling of Semaphorin3A (Sema3A), a repulsive axon guidance molecule. Fyn, a Src-type tyrosine kinase, is involved in the Sema3A signaling. However, the relationship between CRMP2 and Fyn in this signaling pathway is still unknown. In our research, we demonstrated that Fyn phosphorylated CRMP2 at Tyr³² residues in HEK293T cells. Immunohistochemical analysis using a phospho-specific antibody at Tyr³² of CRMP showed that Tyr³²-phosphorylated CRMP was abundant in the nervous system, including dorsal root ganglion neurons, the molecular and Purkinje cell layer of adult cerebellum, and hippocampal fimbria. Overexpression of a nonphosphorylated mutant (Tyr³² to Phe³²) of CRMP2 in dorsal root ganglion neurons interfered with Sema3A-induced growth cone collapse response. These results suggest that Fyn-dependent phosphorylation of CRMP2 at Tyr³² is involved in Sema3A signaling.Collapsin response mediator proteins (CRMPs)⁴ have been identified as intracellular proteins that mediate Semaphorin3A (Sema3A) signaling in the nervous system (1). CRMP2 is one of the five members of the CRMP family. CRMPs also mediate signal transduction of NT3, Ephrin, and Reelin (2–4). CRMPs interact with several intracellular molecules, including tubulin, Numb, kinesin1, and Sra1 (5–8). CRMPs are involved in axon guidance, axonal elongation, cell migration, synapse maturation, and the generation of neuronal polarity (1, 2, 4, 5).CRMP family proteins are known to be the major phosphoproteins in the developing brain (1, 9). CRMP2 is phosphorylated by several Ser/Thr kinases, such as Rho kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5), and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) (2, 10–13). The phosphorylation sites of CRMP2 by these kinases are clustered in the C terminus and have already been identified. Rho kinase phosphorylates CRMP2 at Thr⁵⁵⁵ (10). Cdk5 phosphorylates CRMP2 at Ser⁵²², and this phosphorylation is essential for sequential phosphorylations by GSK3β at Ser⁵¹⁸, Thr⁵¹⁴, and Thr⁵⁰⁹ (2, 11–13). These phosphorylations disrupt the interaction of CRMP2 with tubulin or Numb (2, 3, 13). The sequential phosphorylation of CRMP2 by Cdk5 and GSK3β is an essential step in Sema3A signaling (11, 13). Furthermore, the neurofibrillary tangles in the brains of people with Alzheimer disease contain hyperphosphorylated CRMP2 at Thr⁵⁰⁹, Ser⁵¹⁸, and Ser⁵²² (14, 15).CRMPs are also substrates of several tyrosine kinases. The phosphorylation of CRMP2 by Fes/Fps and Fer has been shown to be involved in Sema3A signaling (16, 17). Phosphorylation of CRMP2 at Tyr⁴⁷⁹ by a Src family tyrosine kinase Yes regulates CXCL12-induced T lymphocyte migration (18). We reported previously that Fyn is involved in Sema3A signaling (19). Fyn associates with PlexinA2, one of the components of the Sema3A receptor complex. Fyn also activates Cdk5 through the phosphorylation at Tyr¹⁵ of Cdk5 (19). In dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons from fyn-deficient mice, Sema3A-induced growth cone collapse response is attenuated compared with control mice (19). Furthermore, we recently found that Fyn phosphorylates CRMP1 and that this phosphorylation is involved in Reelin signaling (4). Although it has been shown that CRMP2 is involved in Sema3A signaling (1, 11, 13), the relationship between Fyn and CRMP2 in Sema3A signaling and the tyrosine phosphorylation site(s) of CRMPs remain unknown.Here, we show that Fyn phosphorylates CRMP2 at Tyr³². Using a phospho-specific antibody against Tyr³², we determined that the residue is phosphorylated in vivo. A nonphosphorylated mutant CRMP2Y32F inhibits Sema3A-induced growth cone collapse. These results indicate that tyrosine phosphorylation by Fyn at Tyr³² is involved in Sema3A signaling.     

Identification of Direct Tyrosine Kinase Substrates Based on Protein Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics

Protein kinases are implicated in multiple diseases such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and central nervous system disorders. Identification of kinase substrates is critical to dissecting signaling pathways and to understanding disease pathologies. However, methods and techniques used to identify bona fide kinase substrates have remained elusive. Here we describe a proteomic strategy suitable for identifying kinase specificity and direct substrates in high throughput. This approach includes an in vitro kinase assay-based substrate screening and an endogenous kinase dependent phosphorylation profiling. In the in vitro kinase reaction route, a pool of formerly phosphorylated proteins is directly extracted from whole cell extracts, dephosphorylated by phosphatase treatment, after which the kinase of interest is added. Quantitative proteomics identifies the rephosphorylated proteins as direct substrates in vitro. In parallel, the in vivo quantitative phosphoproteomics is performed in which cells are treated with or without the kinase inhibitor. Together, proteins phosphorylated in vitro overlapping with the kinase-dependent phosphoproteome in vivo represents the physiological direct substrates in high confidence. The protein kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics was applied to identify 25 candidate substrates of the protein-tyrosine kinase SYK, including a number of known substrates and many novel substrates in human B cells. These shed light on possible new roles for SYK in multiple important signaling pathways. The results demonstrate that this integrated proteomic approach can provide an efficient strategy to screen direct substrates for protein tyrosine kinases.Protein phosphorylation plays a pivotal role in regulating biological events such as protein–protein interactions, signal transduction, subcellular localization, and apoptosis (1). Deregulation of kinase-substrate interactions often leads to disease states such as human malignancies, diabetes, and immune disorders (2). Although a number of kinases are being targeted to develop new drugs, our understanding of the precise relationships between protein kinases and their direct substrates is incomplete for the majority of protein kinases (3). Thus, mapping kinase–substrate relationships is essential for the understanding of biological signaling networks and the discovery and development of drugs for targeted therapies (4). Toward this goal, various in vitro kinase assays using synthetic peptide libraries (5), phage expression libraries (6), protein arrays (7–9), or cell extracts (10, 11) have been explored for the screening of kinase substrates.Besides classical biochemical and genetic methods, mass spectrometry-based high throughput approaches have become increasingly attractive because they are capable of sequencing proteins and localizing phosphorylation sites at the same time. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic methods have been extensively applied to kinase-substrate interaction mapping (12) and global phosphorylation profiling (13–15). Although thousands of phosphorylation events can be inspected simultaneously (16, 17), large-scale phosphoproteomics does not typically reveal direct relationships between protein kinases and their substrates.Recently, several mass spectrometry-based proteomic strategies have been introduced for identifying elusive kinase substrates (7, 18, 19). Taking advantage of recent advances of high speed and high-resolution mass spectrometry, these methods used purified, active kinases to phosphorylate cell extracts in vitro, followed by mass spectrometric analysis to identify phosphoproteins. These approaches commonly face the major challenge of distinguishing phosphorylation events triggered by the kinase reaction from background signals introduced by endogenous kinase activities (20). To dissect the phosphorylation cascade, Shokat and colleagues developed an approach named Analog-Sensitive Kinase Allele (ASKA)¹ (21). In their approach, a kinase is engineered to accept a bulky-ATP analog exclusively so that direct phosphorylation caused by the analog-sensitive target kinase can be differentiated from that of wild type kinases. As a result, indirect effects caused by contaminating kinases during the in vitro kinase assay are largely eliminated. ASKA has recently been coupled with quantitative proteomics, termed Quantitative Identification of Kinase Substrates (QIKS) (12), to identify substrate proteins of Mek1. Recently, one extension of the ASKA technique is for the analog ATP to carry a γ-thiophosphate group so that in vitro thiophosphorylated proteins can be isolated for mass spectrometric detection (22–24). In addition to ASKA, radioisotope labeling using [γ-³²P]ATP (10), using concentrated purified kinase (25), inactivating endogenous kinase activity by an additional heating step (11), and quantitative proteomics (26, 27) are alternative means aimed to address the same issues. All of these methods, however, have been limited to the identification of in vitro kinase substrates.To bridge the gap between in vitro phosphorylation and physiological phosphorylation events, we have recently introduced an integrated strategy termed Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (KALIP) (28). By combining in vitro kinase assays with in vivo phosphoproteomics, this method was demonstrated to have exceptional sensitivity for high confidence identification of direct kinase substrates. The main drawback for the KALIP approach is that the kinase reaction is performed at the peptide stage to eliminate any problems related to contamination by endogenous kinases. However, the KALIP method may not be effective for kinases that require a priming phosphorylation event (i.e. a previous phosphorylation, on substrate or kinase, has effect on following phosphorylation) (29), additional interacting surfaces (30), or a docking site on the protein (31). For example, basophilic kinases require multiple basic resides for phosphorylation and tryptic digestion will abolish these motifs, which are needed for effective kinase reactions.We address the shortcoming by introducing an alternative strategy termed Protein Kinase Assay-Linked Phosphoproteomics (proKALIP). The major difference between this method and the previous KALIP method is the utilization of protein extracts instead of digested peptides as the substrate pool. The major issue is how to reduce potential interference by endogenous kinase activities. One effective solution is to use a generic kinase inhibitor, 5′-(4-fluorosulfonylbenzoyl)adenosine (FSBA), which was widely used for covalent labeling of kinases (32, 33), kinase isolation (34), kinase activity exploration (35, 36), and more recently kinase substrate identification by Kothary and co-workers (37). However, an extra step is required to effectively remove the inhibitor before the kinase reaction, which may decrease the sensitivity. ProKALIP addresses the issue by carrying out the kinase reaction using formerly in vivo phosphorylated proteins as candidates. This step efficiently improves the sensitivity and specificity of the in vitro kinase reaction. Coupled with in vivo phosphoproteomics, proKALIP has gained a high sensitivity and provided physiologically relevant substrates with high confidence.To demonstrate the proKALIP strategy, the protein-tyrosine kinase SYK was used as our target kinase. SYK is known to play a crucial role in the adaptive immune response, particularly in B cells, by facilitating the antigen induced B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways and modulating cellular responses to oxidative stress in a receptor-independent manner (38, 39). SYK also has diverse biological functions such as innate immune recognition, osteoclast maturation, cellular adhesion, platelet activation, and vascular development (38). In addition, the expression of SYK is highly correlated to tumorigenesis by promoting cell–cell adhesion and inhibiting the motility, growth, and invasiveness of certain cancer cells (40). In this study, we attempt to identify bona fide substrates of SYK in human B cells using the proKALIP approach and demonstrate the specificity and sensitivity of this strategy.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation at a Site Highly Conserved in the L1 Family of Cell Adhesion Molecules Abolishes Ankyrin Binding and Increases Lateral Mobility of Neurofascin

This paper presents evidence that a member of the L1 family of ankyrin-binding cell adhesion molecules is a substrate for protein tyrosine kinase(s) and phosphatase(s), identifies the highly conserved FIGQY tyrosine in the cytoplasmic domain as the principal site of phosphorylation, and demonstrates that phosphorylation of the FIGQY tyrosine abolishes ankyrin-binding activity. Neurofascin expressed in neuroblastoma cells is subject to tyrosine phosphorylation after activation of tyrosine kinases by NGF or bFGF or inactivation of tyrosine phosphatases with vanadate or dephostatin. Furthermore, both neurofascin and the related molecule Nr-CAM are tyrosine phosphorylated in a developmentally regulated pattern in rat brain. The FIGQY sequence is present in the cytoplasmic domains of all members of the L1 family of neural cell adhesion molecules. Phosphorylation of the FIGQY tyrosine abolishes ankyrin binding, as determined by coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous ankyrin and in vitro ankyrin-binding assays. Measurements of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching demonstrate that phosphorylation of the FIGQY tyrosine also increases lateral mobility of neurofascin expressed in neuroblastoma cells to the same extent as removal of the cytoplasmic domain. Ankyrin binding, therefore, appears to regulate the dynamic behavior of neurofascin and is the target for regulation by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to external signals. These findings suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation at the FIGQY site represents a highly conserved mechanism, used by the entire class of L1-related cell adhesion molecules, for regulation of ankyrin-dependent connections to the spectrin skeleton.Vertebrate L1, neurofascin, neuroglial cell adhesion molecule (Ng-CAM),¹ Ng-CAM–related cell adhesion molecule (Nr-CAM), and Drosophila neuroglian are members of a family of nervous system cell adhesion molecules that possess variable extracellular domains comprised of Ig and fibronectin type III domains and a relatively conserved cytoplasmic domain (Grumet, 1991; Hortsch and Goodman, 1991; Rathgen and Jessel, 1991; Sonderegger and Rathgen, 1992; Hortsch, 1996). Members of this family, including a number of alternatively spliced forms, are abundant in the nervous system during early development as well as in adults. Neurofascin and Nr-CAM, for example, constitute ∼0.5% of the total membrane protein in adult brain (Davis et al., 1993; Davis and Bennett, 1994). Cellular functions attributed to the L1 family include axon fasciculation (Stallcup and Beasley, 1985; Landmesser et al., 1988; Brummendorf and Rathjen, 1993; Bastmeyer et al., 1995; Itoh et al., 1995; Magyar-Lehmann et al., 1995), axonal guidance (van den Pol and Kim, 1993; Liljelund et al., 1994; Brittis and Silver, 1995; Brittis et al., 1995; Lochter et al., 1995; Wong et al., 1996), neurite extension (Chang et al., 1987; Felsenfeld et al., 1994; Hankin and Lagenaur, 1994; Ignelzi et al., 1994; Williams et al., 1994a ,b,c,d; Doherty et al., 1995; Zhao and Siu, 1995), a role in long term potentiation (Luthl et al., 1994), synaptogenesis (Itoh et al., 1995), and myelination (Wood et al., 1990). The potential clinical importance of this group of proteins has been emphasized by the findings that mutations in the L1 gene on the X chromosome are responsible for developmental anomalies including hydrocephalus and mental retardation (Rosenthal et al., 1992; Jouet et al., 1994; Wong et al., 1995).The conserved cytoplasmic domains of L1 family members include a binding site for the membrane skeletal protein ankyrin. This interaction was first described for neurofascin (Davis et. al., 1993) and subsequently has been observed for L1, Nr-CAM (Davis and Bennett, 1994), and Drosophila neuroglian (Dubreuil et al., 1996). The membrane-binding domain of ankyrin contains two distinct sites for neurofascin and has the potential to promote lateral association of neurofascin and presumably other L1 family members (Michaely and Bennett, 1995). Nodes of Ranvier are physiologically relevant axonal sites where ankyrin and L1 family members collaborate, based on findings of colocalization of a specialized isoform of ankyrin with alternatively spliced forms of neurofascin and NrCAM in adults (Davis et al., 1996) as well as in early axonal developmental intermediates (Lambert, S., J. Davis, P. Michael, and V. Bennett. 1995. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:98a).L1, after homophilic and/or heterophilic binding, participates in signal transduction pathways that ultimately are associated with neurite extension and outgrowth (Ignelzi et al., 1994; Williams et al., 1994a ,b,c,d; Doherty et al., 1995). L1 copurifies with a serine–threonine protein kinase (Sadoul et al., 1989) and is phosphorylated on a serine residue that is not conserved among other family members (Wong et al., 1996). L1 pathway(s) may also involve G proteins, calcium channels, and tyrosine phosphorylation (Williams et al., 1994a ,b,c,d; Doherty et al., 1995). After homophilic interactions, L1 directly activates a tyrosine signaling cascade after a lateral association of its ectodomain with the fibroblast growth factor receptor (Doherty et al., 1995). Antibodies against L1 have also been shown to activate protein tyrosine phosphatase activity in growth cones (Klinz et al., 1995). However, details of the downstream substrates of L1-promoted phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and possible roles of the cytoplasmic domain are not known.Tyrosine phosphorylation is well established to modulate cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions involving integrins and their associated proteins (Akiyama et al., 1994; Arroyo et al., 1994; Schlaepfer et al., 1994; Law et al., 1996) as well as the cadherins (Balsamo et al., 1996; Krypta et al., 1996; Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995; Shibamoto et al., 1995; Hoschuetzky et al., 1994; Matsuyoshi et al., 1992). For example, the adhesive functions of the calciumdependent cadherin cell adhesion molecule are mediated by a dynamic balance between tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin by TrkA and dephosphorylation via the LARtype protein tyrosine phosphatase (Krypta et al., 1996). In this example the regulation of binding among the structural proteins is the result of a coordination between classes of protein kinases and protein phosphatases.This study presents evidence that neurofascin, expressed in a rat neuroblastoma cell line, is a substrate for both tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases at a tyrosine residue conserved among all members of the L1 family. Site-specific tyrosine phosphorylation promoted by both tyrosine kinase activators (NGF and bFGF) and protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors (dephostatin and vanadate) is a strong negative regulator of the neurofascin– ankyrin binding interaction and modulates the membrane dynamic behavior of neurofascin. Furthermore, neurofascin and, to a lesser extent Nr-CAM, are also shown here to be tyrosine phosphorylated in developing rat brain, implying a physiological relevance to this phenomenon. These results indicate that neurofascin may be a target for the coordinate control over phosphorylation that is elicited by protein kinases and phosphatases during in vivo tyrosine phosphorylation cascades. The consequent decrease in ankyrin-binding capacity due to phosphorylation of neurofascin could represent a general mechanism among the L1 family members for regulation of membrane–cytoskeletal interactions in both developing and adult nervous systems.     

Regulation of Microtubule Dynamic Instability in Vitro by Differentially Phosphorylated Stathmin

Stathmin is an important regulator of microtubule polymerization and dynamics. When unphosphorylated it destabilizes microtubules in two ways, by reducing the microtubule polymer mass through sequestration of soluble tubulin into an assembly-incompetent T2S complex (two α:β tubulin dimers per molecule of stathmin), and by increasing the switching frequency (catastrophe frequency) from growth to shortening at plus and minus ends by binding directly to the microtubules. Phosphorylation of stathmin on one or more of its four serine residues (Ser¹⁶, Ser²⁵, Ser³⁸, and Ser⁶³) reduces its microtubule-destabilizing activity. However, the effects of phosphorylation of the individual serine residues of stathmin on microtubule dynamic instability have not been investigated systematically. Here we analyzed the effects of stathmin singly phosphorylated at Ser¹⁶ or Ser⁶³, and doubly phosphorylated at Ser²⁵ and Ser³⁸, on its ability to modulate microtubule dynamic instability at steady-state in vitro. Phosphorylation at either Ser¹⁶ or Ser⁶³ strongly reduced or abolished the ability of stathmin to bind to and sequester soluble tubulin and its ability to act as a catastrophe factor by directly binding to the microtubules. In contrast, double phosphorylation of Ser²⁵ and Ser³⁸ did not affect the binding of stathmin to tubulin or microtubules or its catastrophe-promoting activity. Our results indicate that the effects of stathmin on dynamic instability are strongly but differently attenuated by phosphorylation at Ser¹⁶ and Ser⁶³ and support the hypothesis that selective targeting by Ser¹⁶-specific or Ser⁶³-specific kinases provides complimentary mechanisms for regulating microtubule function.Stathmin is an 18-kDa ubiquitously expressed microtubule-destabilizing phosphoprotein whose activity is modulated by phosphorylation of its four serine residues, Ser¹⁶, Ser²⁵, Ser³⁸, and Ser⁶³ (1–7). Several classes of kinases have been identified that phosphorylate stathmin, including kinases associated with cell growth and differentiation such as members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)2 family, cAMP-dependent protein kinase (1–5, 8–11), and kinases associated with cell cycle regulation such as cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (3, 12–14). Phosphorylation of stathmin is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis and for proper assembly/function of the mitotic spindle (3, 13–16). Inhibition of stathmin phosphorylation produces strong mitotic phenotypes characterized by disassembly and disorganization of mitotic spindles and abnormal chromosome distributions (3, 13–14).Stathmin is known to destabilize microtubules in two ways. One is by binding to soluble tubulin and forming a stable complex that cannot polymerize into microtubules, consisting of one molecule of stathmin and two molecules of tubulin (T2S complex) (17–24). Addition of stathmin to microtubules in equilibrium with soluble tubulin results in sequestration of the tubulin and a reduction in the level of microtubule polymer (17–18, 22, 25–28). In addition to reducing the amount of assembled polymer, tubulin sequestration by stathmin has been shown to increase the switching frequency at microtubule plus ends from growth to shortening (called the catastrophe frequency) as the microtubules relax to a new steady state (17, 29). The second way is by binding directly to microtubules (27–30). The direct binding of stathmin to microtubules increases the catastrophe frequency at both ends of the microtubules and considerably more strongly at minus ends than at plus ends (27). Consistent with its strong catastrophe-promoting activity at minus ends, stathmin increases the treadmilling rate of steady-state microtubules in vitro (27). These results have led to the suggestion that stathmin might be an important cellular regulator of minus-end microtubule dynamics (27).Phosphorylation of stathmin diminishes its ability to regulate microtubule polymerization (3, 14, 25–26). Phosphorylation of Ser¹⁶ or Ser⁶³ appears to be more critical than phosphorylation of Ser²⁵ and Ser³⁸ for the ability of stathmin to bind to soluble tubulin and to inhibit microtubule assembly in vitro (3, 25). Inhibition of stathmin phosphorylation induces defects in spindle assembly and organization (3, 14) suggesting that not only soluble tubulin-microtubule levels are regulated by phosphorylation of stathmin, but the dynamics of microtubules could also be regulated in a phosphorylation-dependent manner.It is not known how phosphorylation at any of the four serine residues of stathmin affects its ability to regulate microtubule dynamics and, specifically, its ability to increase the catastrophe frequency at plus and minus ends due to its direct interaction with microtubules. Thus, we determined the effects of stathmin individually phosphorylated at either Ser¹⁶ or Ser⁶³ and doubly phosphorylated at both Ser²⁵ and Ser³⁸ on dynamic instability at plus and minus ends in vitro at microtubule polymer steady state and physiological pH (pH 7.2). We find that phosphorylation of Ser¹⁶ strongly reduces the direct catastrophe-promoting activity of stathmin at plus ends and abolishes it at minus ends, whereas phosphorylation of Ser⁶³ abolishes the activity at both ends. The effects of phosphorylation of individual serines correlated well with stathmin''s reduced abilities to form stable T2S complexes, to inhibit microtubule polymerization, and to bind to microtubules. In contrast, double phosphorylation of Ser²⁵ and Ser³⁸ did not alter the ability of stathmin to modulate dynamic instability at the microtubule ends, its ability to form a stable T2S complex, or its ability to bind to microtubules. The data further support the hypotheses that phosphorylation of stathmin on either Ser¹⁶ or Ser⁶³ plays a critical role in regulating microtubule polymerization and dynamics in cells.     

Systematic Analysis of the Phosphoproteome and Kinase-substrate Networks in the Mouse Testis

Spermatogenesis is a complex process closely associated with the phosphorylation-orchestrated cell cycle. Elucidating the phosphorylation-based regulations should advance our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Here we present an integrative study of phosphorylation events in the testis. Large-scale phosphoproteome profiling in the adult mouse testis identified 17,829 phosphorylation sites in 3955 phosphoproteins. Although only approximately half of the phosphorylation sites enriched by IMAC were also captured by TiO₂, both the phosphoprotein data sets identified by the two methods significantly enriched the functional annotation of spermatogenesis. Thus, the phosphoproteome profiled in this study is a highly useful snapshot of the phosphorylation events in spermatogenesis. To further understand phosphoregulation in the testis, the site-specific kinase-substrate relations were computationally predicted for reconstructing kinase-substrate phosphorylation networks. A core sub-kinase-substrate phosphorylation networks among the spermatogenesis-related proteins was retrieved and analyzed to explore the phosphoregulation during spermatogenesis. Moreover, network-based analyses demonstrated that a number of protein kinases such as MAPKs, CDK2, and CDC2 with statistically more site-specific kinase-substrate relations might have significantly higher activities and play an essential role in spermatogenesis, and the predictions were consistent with previous studies on the regulatory roles of these kinases. In particular, the analyses proposed that the activities of POLO-like kinases (PLKs) might be dramatically higher, while the prediction was experimentally validated by detecting and comparing the phosphorylation levels of pT210, an indicator of PLK1 activation, in testis and other tissues. Further experiments showed that the inhibition of POLO-like kinases decreases cell proliferation by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest. Taken together, this systematic study provides a global landscape of phosphoregulation in the testis, and should prove to be of value in future studies of spermatogenesis.Spermatogenesis is a complex sperm-generating process involving the mitosis of spermatogonia, meiosis of spermatocytes, and spermiogenesis of spermatids. Sperms are produced in the male testis at the speed of ∼1000 sperm per heart beat (1), which indicate that spermatogenesis is an extremely dynamic process in the testis. The protein expression levels during spermatogenesis have been well studied by high-throughput proteomic studies, and over 7000 proteins have been identified in the mammalian testis (2–4). However, the dynamic regulatory events that orchestrate this complex process have yet to be elucidated. Because phosphorylation, an important and ubiquitous post-translational modification (PTM)¹, is one of the most critical regulatory mechanisms of the cell cycle (5), which is particularly active during spermatogenesis, a number of pioneering studies have contributed to our understanding of phosphoregulation in spermatogenesis. For example, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) such as ERK1/2, were found to play an important role in ectoplasmic specialization dynamics during spermatogenesis (6). As important regulators of the cell cycle (7, 8), the POLO-like kinases (PLKs) especially PLK1, were found to be required at multiple stages of spermatogenesis (9–12). Thus, a systematic analysis of phosphorylation in the testis is of great importance for advancing the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of spermatogenesis.In order to elucidate the phosphorylation-mediated regulation of spermatogenesis, the characterization of the testicular phosphoproteome could serve as a straightforward start. Recently, rapid progress in mass spectrometry based proteomic technologies has greatly advanced to a state-of-art stage at which thousands of PTM sites can be identified in a single run (13). Although a large proportion of these studies were carried out in cell lines, only a handful of studies have contributed to the identification of phosphoproteome in testis and sperm (14–19). For example, Huttlin et al. identified ∼36,000 phosphorylation sites in 6296 proteins from nine tissues, including the 3-week testis of immature mice (16). Because neither elongated spermatids nor sperms exist in such immature testes (16), it might be impossible to identify of phosphorylation sites across all stages of spermatogenesis from the samples. Moreover, a recent study characterized the testicular phosphoproteome in the perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA)-exposed rats, and demonstrated the importance of MAPK pathway and CDC2 protein phosphorylation in the toxicity of PFDoA (19). Taken together, despite the fact that a number of studies have been carried out (18), our understanding of the testicular phosphoproteome is still limited, and more effort needs to be expended on this area.In coordination with the exploration of the phosphoproteome, the technology for analyzing kinase-substrate relations (KSRs) has also greatly advanced. In addition to conventional experimental approaches, a number of computational studies have been carried out (8, 20–23), whereas network approaches have attracted growing attention (20, 22). In 2007, Linding et al. first constructed a human kinase-substrate phosphorylation network (KSPN) through the prediction of site-specific kinase-substrate relations (ssKSRs) with a novel algorithm NetworKIN (24, 25). Combined with sequence-based predictions using the Group-based Prediction System (GPS) algorithm and protein–protein interactions (PPIs), we also developed iGPS (in vivo GPS) software to reconstruct ssKSR-based KSPNs in eukaryotes, and achieved a superior performance compared with NetworKIN (26). With these computational tools, network-based analyses can be performed for mining phospho-signatures from the phosphoproteomic data. For example, based on a hypothesis that a kinase with higher activity will phosphorylate more sites, we designed a novel computational method of kinase activity analysis (KAA) to statistically identify kinases with significantly more or less phosphorylation sites (20, 26). Using the human whole phosphoproteome as a background, we totally detected 60 kinases with higher activities (i.e. with more sites) from a human liver phosphoproteome (26). Our hypothesis and methodology was successfully supported by following studies, which used phospho-specific antibodies to validate the modification levels of the activity-associated autophosphorylation sites in the predicted kinases (27, 28). In particular, the two studies demonstrated that kinases predicted with significantly higher activities can act as important regulators in distinct biological processes by regulating the KSPNs (27, 28). However, such an analysis of potentially differential kinase activities in spermatogenesis still remains to be performed.In this study, we systematically profiled the phosphoproteome in the adult mouse testes. Using phosphopeptide enrichment methods, including immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) and Titanium dioxide (TiO₂), high-throughput mass spectrometry identified 17,829 phosphorylation sites in 3955 proteins in the adult mouse testis. Although only approximately half of the phosphorylation sites enriched by IMAC were also enriched by TiO₂, statistical analyses of the gene ontology (GO) terms consistently found the GO term “spermatogenesis” to be significantly over-represented. Thus, as the first comprehensive phosphoproteome in mature testis, these results provide an in-depth picture of phosphorylation in spermatogenesis. To further investigate phosphoregulation, the ssKSRs were predicted and employed to re-construct the KSPNs in the testis. Based on the working concept that kinases with a higher level of activity phosphorylate more sites (26), the predicted ssKSRs were used to predict the kinase activity profiles. Although the overlap of different phosphoproteome data sets is limited, the kinase activity profiles indicate a pattern of consistently high activity for a number of kinases, including the MAPKs, CDKs, and especially the POLO-like kinases (PLKs). Through Western blot detection of the phosphorylation levels of T210, which is positively correlated with PLK1 activation (29–32), it was observed that PLK1 was highly activated in testis. The PLKs inhibition assay results showed that PLKs activities are critical for cell proliferation in the spermatocyte GC2 cell line, whereas PLKs inhibition generated G2/M arrest. Taken together, this study of the testicular phosphoproteome provides a systematic understanding of the phosphorylation that occurs during spermatogenesis, with the results able to serve as a resource for future investigation.     

Evolutionary Constraints of Phosphorylation in Eukaryotes,Prokaryotes, and Mitochondria

High accuracy mass spectrometry has proven to be a powerful technology for the large scale identification of serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation in the living cell. However, despite many described phosphoproteomes, there has been no comparative study of the extent of phosphorylation and its evolutionary conservation in all domains of life. Here we analyze the results of phosphoproteomics studies performed with the same technology in a diverse set of organisms. For the most ancient organisms, the prokaryotes, only a few hundred proteins have been found to be phosphorylated. Applying the same technology to eukaryotic species resulted in the detection of thousands of phosphorylation events. Evolutionary analysis shows that prokaryotic phosphoproteins are preferentially conserved in all living organisms, whereas-site specific phosphorylation is not. Eukaryotic phosphosites are generally more conserved than their non-phosphorylated counterparts (with similar structural constraints) throughout the eukaryotic domain. Yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans are two exceptions, indicating that the majority of phosphorylation events evolved after the divergence of higher eukaryotes from yeast and reflecting the unusually large number of nematode-specific kinases. Mitochondria present an interesting intermediate link between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic domains. Applying the same technology to this organelle yielded 174 phosphorylation sites mapped to 74 proteins. Thus, the mitochondrial phosphoproteome is similarly sparse as the prokaryotic phosphoproteomes. As expected from the endosymbiotic theory, phosphorylated as well as non-phosphorylated mitochondrial proteins are significantly conserved in prokaryotes. However, mitochondrial phosphorylation sites are not conserved throughout prokaryotes, consistent with the notion that serine/threonine phosphorylation in prokaryotes occurred relatively recently in evolution. Thus, the phosphoproteome reflects major events in the evolution of life.Reversible protein phosphorylation on serines, threonines, and tyrosines plays a crucial role in regulating processes in all living organisms ranging from prokaryotes to eukaryotes (1). Traditionally, phosphorylation has been detected in single, purified proteins using in vitro assays. Recent advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics now allow the identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites with high accuracy (2–7). On-line databases such as PhosphoSite (8), Phospho.ELM (9), and PHOSIDA1 (10) have collected and organized thousands of identified phosphosites. These databases as well as dedicated analysis environments such as NetworKIN (11, 12) offer and use contextual information including structural features, potential kinases, and conservation. They constitute resources that should allow the derivation of general patterns for phosphorylation events. Specifically, the recent availability of data for archaeal, prokaryotic, and diverse eukaryotic phosphoproteomes in these databases should enable investigation of the evolutionary history of this post-translational modification.Prokaryotes have two separate classes of phosphorylation events. Apart from the canonical histidine/aspartate phosphorylation, which has been studied for decades, serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation is also present and has recently become amenable to analysis by MS (13). Bacterial phosphoproteins are involved in protein synthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system. Recent phosphoproteomics studies of Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Lactococcus lactis described around 100 phosphorylation sites on serine, threonine, and tyrosine in each of these species (13–15). Bacterial phosphorylation sites can change in response to environmental conditions (16).Interestingly, even archaea have serine/threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation. A recent study of Halobacterium salinarum described 75 serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation sites on 62 proteins involved in a wide range of cellular processes including a variety of metabolic pathways (17).Although only a few hundred phosphorylation events have been found in prokaryotic species, similar experimental conditions and effort have yielded the detection of thousands of phosphorylation events in eukaryotes ranging from yeast to human (7, 18–21). Before the advent of large scale phosphoproteomics, serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphorylation has been estimated to affect one-third of all proteins (22). Recent large scale phosphoproteomics studies now suggest that more than half of all eukaryotic proteins are phosphorylated (23).A key event in evolution was the endosymbiosis of prokaryotes that enabled the development of a much more complex type of life, the eukaryotic cell. Analyses of mitochondrial genes suggest that the α-proteobacterium Rickettsia prowazekii is the endosymbiotic precursor leading to modern mitochondria (24). Almost all of the mitochondrial genes have migrated to the nuclear genome during subsequent evolution, and it is predicted that 10–15% of eukaryotic nuclear genes of organisms encode mitochondrial proteins (25).Thus, mitochondria with their unique evolutionary position between prokaryotes and eukaryotes form an interesting link for the evolutionary analysis of phosphorylation. Several studies investigated the mitochondrial phosphoproteome in different organisms using gel electrophoresis or specific enrichment methods coupled with mass spectrometry (26–28). Those studies established potential mitochondrial phosphoproteins. Three large scale studies based on affinity enrichment of phosphopeptides and mass spectrometry obtained direct experimental evidence of phosphorylation sites in mitochondria. Lee et al. (29) used a combination of different peptide enrichment strategies and found 80 phosphorylation sites of 48 different proteins from mouse liver. Very recently, a study by Deng et al. (30) characterized the murine cardiac mitochondrial mouse phosphoproteome, covering 236 phosphosites on 181 proteins. Investigating yeast, Reinders et al. (31) assigned 84 phosphorylation sites in 62 proteins.To enable comparative analysis of phosphoproteomes between all domains of life and mitochondria, here we experimentally determined a high accuracy mitochondrial mouse phosphoproteome based on technology conditions similar to those applied to the identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic phosphoproteomes. We then performed a detailed evolutionary study of the conservation of the identified phosphoproteins and phosphorylation sites in prokaryotes and in eukaryotes. This allowed an initial comparison of the phosphoproteomes of prokaryotes, mitochondria, and eukaryotes.     

Role of Partitioning-defective 1/Microtubule Affinity-regulating Kinases in the Morphogenetic Activity of Helicobacter pylori CagA

Helicobacter pylori CagA plays a key role in gastric carcinogenesis. Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA binds and deregulates SHP-2 phosphatase, a bona fide oncoprotein, thereby causing sustained ERK activation and impaired focal adhesions. CagA also binds and inhibits PAR1b/MARK2, one of the four members of the PAR1 family of kinases, to elicit epithelial polarity defect. In nonpolarized gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces the hummingbird phenotype, an extremely elongated cell shape characterized by a rear retraction defect. This morphological change is dependent on CagA-deregulated SHP-2 and is thus thought to reflect the oncogenic potential of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of the PAR1 family of kinases in the hummingbird phenotype. We found that CagA binds not only PAR1b but also other PAR1 isoforms, with order of strength as follows: PAR1b > PAR1d ≥ PAR1a > PAR1c. Binding of CagA with PAR1 isoforms inhibits the kinase activity. This abolishes the ability of PAR1 to destabilize microtubules and thereby promotes disassembly of focal adhesions, which contributes to the hummingbird phenotype. Consistently, PAR1 knockdown potentiates induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA. The morphogenetic activity of CagA was also found to be augmented through inhibition of non-muscle myosin II. Because myosin II is functionally associated with PAR1, perturbation of PAR1-regulated myosin II by CagA may underlie the defect of rear retraction in the hummingbird phenotype. Our findings reveal that CagA systemically inhibits PAR1 family kinases and indicate that malfunctioning of microtubules and myosin II by CagA-mediated PAR1 inhibition cooperates with deregulated SHP-2 in the morphogenetic activity of CagA.Infection with Helicobacter pylori strains bearing cagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A)-positive strains is the strongest risk factor for the development of gastric carcinoma, the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1–3). The cagA gene is located within a 40-kb DNA fragment, termed the cag pathogenicity island, which is specifically present in the genome of cagA-positive H. pylori strains (4–6). In addition to cagA, there are ∼30 genes in the cag pathogenicity island, many of which encode a bacterial type IV secretion system that delivers the cagA-encoded CagA protein into gastric epithelial cells (7–10). Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA is localized to the plasma membrane, where it undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation at the C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala motifs by Src family kinases or c-Abl kinase (11–14). The C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala-containing region of CagA is noted for the structural diversity among distinct H. pylori isolates. Oncogenic potential of CagA has recently been confirmed by a study showing that systemic expression of CagA in mice induces gastrointestinal and hematological malignancies (15).When expressed in gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces morphological transformation termed the hummingbird phenotype, which is characterized by the development of one or two long and thin protrusions resembling the beak of the hummingbird. It has been thought that the hummingbird phenotype is related to the oncogenic action of CagA (7, 16–19). Pathophysiological relevance for the hummingbird phenotype in gastric carcinogenesis has recently been provided by the observation that infection with H. pylori carrying CagA with greater ability to induce the hummingbird phenotype is more closely associated with gastric carcinoma (20–23). Elevated motility of hummingbird cells (cells showing the hummingbird phenotype) may also contribute to invasion and metastasis of gastric carcinoma.In host cells, CagA interacts with the SHP-2 phosphatase, C-terminal Src kinase, and Crk adaptor in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner (16, 24, 25) and also associates with Grb2 adaptor and c-Met in a phosphorylation-independent manner (26, 27). Among these CagA targets, much attention has been focused on SHP-2 because the phosphatase has been recognized as a bona fide oncoprotein, gain-of-function mutations of which are found in various human malignancies (17, 18, 28). Stable interaction of CagA with SHP-2 requires CagA dimerization, which is mediated by a 16-amino acid CagA-multimerization (CM)² sequence present in the C-terminal region of CagA (29). Upon complex formation, CagA aberrantly activates SHP-2 and thereby elicits sustained ERK MAP kinase activation that promotes mitogenesis (30). Also, CagA-activated SHP-2 dephosphorylates and inhibits focal adhesion kinase (FAK), causing impaired focal adhesions. It has been shown previously that both aberrant ERK activation and FAK inhibition by CagA-deregulated SHP-2 are involved in induction of the hummingbird phenotype (31).Partitioning-defective 1 (PAR1)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (MARK) is an evolutionally conserved serine/threonine kinase originally isolated in C. elegans (32–34). Mammalian cells possess four structurally related PAR1 isoforms, PAR1a/MARK3, PAR1b/MARK2, PAR1c/MARK1, and PAR1d/MARK4 (35–37). Among these, PAR1a, PAR1b, and PAR1c are expressed in a variety of cells, whereas PAR1d is predominantly expressed in neural cells (35, 37). These PAR1 isoforms phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and thereby destabilize microtubules (35, 38), allowing asymmetric distribution of molecules that are involved in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity.In polarized epithelial cells, CagA disrupts the tight junctions and causes loss of apical-basolateral polarity (39, 40). This CagA activity involves the interaction of CagA with PAR1b/MARK2 (19, 41). CagA directly binds to the kinase domain of PAR1b in a tyrosine phosphorylation-independent manner and inhibits the kinase activity. Notably, CagA binds to PAR1b via the CM sequence (19). Because PAR1b is present as a dimer in cells (42), CagA may passively homodimerize upon complex formation with the PAR1 dimer via the CM sequence, and this PAR1-directed CagA dimer would form a stable complex with SHP-2 through its two SH2 domains.Because of the critical role of CagA in gastric carcinogenesis (7, 16–19), it is important to elucidate the molecular basis underlying the morphogenetic activity of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of PAR1 isoforms in induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA, and we obtained evidence that CagA-mediated inhibition of PAR1 kinases contributes to the development of the morphological change by perturbing microtubules and non-muscle myosin II.     

PR55��, a Regulatory Subunit of PP2A, Specifically Regulates PP2A-mediated ��-Catenin Dephosphorylation

A central question in Wnt signaling is the regulation of β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Multiple kinases, including CKIα and GSK3, are involved in β-catenin phosphorylation. Protein phosphatases such as PP2A and PP1 have been implicated in the regulation of β-catenin. However, which phosphatase dephosphorylates β-catenin in vivo and how the specificity of β-catenin dephosphorylation is regulated are not clear. In this study, we show that PP2A regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation in vivo. We demonstrate that PP2A is required for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Drosophila. Moreover, we have identified PR55α as the regulatory subunit of PP2A that controls β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. PR55α, but not the catalytic subunit, PP2Ac, directly interacts with β-catenin. RNA interference knockdown of PR55α elevates β-catenin phosphorylation and decreases Wnt signaling, whereas overexpressing PR55α enhances Wnt signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that PR55α specifically regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation and plays an essential role in Wnt signaling.Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays essential roles in development and tumorigenesis (1–3). Our previous work found that β-catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CKIα⁴ and GSK3 (4), which creates a binding site for β-Trcp (5), leading to degradation via the ubiquitination/proteasome machinery (3). Mutations in β-catenin or APC genes that prevent β-catenin phosphorylation or ubiquitination/degradation lead ultimately to cancer (1, 2).In addition to the involvement of kinases, protein phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, and PP2C, are also implicated in Wnt/β-catenin regulation. PP2C and PP1 may regulate dephosphorylation of Axin and play positive roles in Wnt signaling (6, 7). PP2A is a multisubunit enzyme (8–10); it has been reported to play either positive or negative roles in Wnt signaling likely by targeting different components (11–21). Toward the goal of understanding the mechanism of β-catenin phosphorylation, we carried out siRNA screening targeting several major phosphatases, in which we found that PP2A dephosphorylates β-catenin. This is consistent with a recent study where PP2A is shown to dephosphorylate β-catenin in a cell-free system (18).PP2A consists of a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), a structure subunit (PR65/A), and variable regulatory B subunits (PR/B, PR/B′, PR/B″, or PR/B‴). The substrate specificity of PP2A is thought to be determined by its B subunit (9). By siRNA screening, we further identified that PR55α, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Mechanistically, we found that PR55α directly interacts with β-catenin and regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation in Wnt signaling.     

Identification of Novel in Vivo Phosphorylation Sites of the Human Proapoptotic Protein BAD: PORE-FORMING ACTIVITY OF BAD IS REGULATED BY PHOSPHORYLATION*

BAD is a proapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 protein family that is regulated by phosphorylation in response to survival factors. Although much attention has been devoted to the identification of phosphorylation sites in murine BAD, little data are available with respect to phosphorylation of human BAD protein. Using mass spectrometry, we identified here besides the established phosphorylation sites at serines 75, 99, and 118 several novel in vivo phosphorylation sites within human BAD (serines 25, 32/34, 97, and 124). Furthermore, we investigated the quantitative contribution of BAD targeting kinases in phosphorylating serine residues 75, 99, and 118. Our results indicate that RAF kinases represent, besides protein kinase A, PAK, and Akt/protein kinase B, in vivo BAD-phosphorylating kinases. RAF-induced phosphorylation of BAD was reduced to control levels using the RAF inhibitor BAY 43-9006. This phosphorylation was not prevented by MEK inhibitors. Consistently, expression of constitutively active RAF suppressed apoptosis induced by BAD and the inhibition of colony formation caused by BAD could be prevented by RAF. In addition, using the surface plasmon resonance technique, we analyzed the direct consequences of BAD phosphorylation by RAF with respect to association with 14-3-3 and Bcl-2/Bcl-X_L proteins. Phosphorylation of BAD by active RAF promotes 14-3-3 protein association, in which the phosphoserine 99 represented the major binding site. Finally, we show here that BAD forms channels in planar bilayer membranes in vitro. This pore-forming capacity was dependent on phosphorylation status and interaction with 14-3-3 proteins. Collectively, our findings provide new insights into the regulation of BAD function by phosphorylation.Apoptosis is a genetically programmed, morphologically distinct form of cell death that can be triggered by a variety of physiological and pathological stimuli (1–3). This form of cellular suicide is widely observed in nature and is not only essential for embryogenesis, immune responses, and tissue homeostasis but is also involved in diseases such as tumor development and progression. Bcl-2 family proteins play a pivotal role in controlling programmed cell death. The major function of these proteins is to directly modulate outer mitochondrial membrane permeability and thereby regulate the release of apoptogenic factors from the intermembrane space into the cytoplasm (for a recent review, see Ref. 4). On the basis of various structural and functional characteristics, the Bcl-2 family of proteins is divided into three subfamilies, including proteins that either inhibit (e.g. Bcl-2, Bcl-X_L, or Bcl-w) or promote programmed cell death (e.g. Bax, Bak, or Bok) (5, 6). A second subclass of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members, the BH3²-only proteins, comprises BAD, Bik, Bmf, Hrk, Noxa, truncated Bid, Bim, and Puma (4). BH3-only proteins share sequence homology only at the BH3 domain. The amphipathic helix formed by the BH3 domain (and neighboring residues) associates with a hydrophobic groove of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members (7, 8). Originally, truncated Bid has been reported to interact with Bax and Bak (9), suggesting that some BH3-only proteins promote apoptosis via at least two different mechanisms: inactivating Bcl-2-like proteins by direct binding and/or by inducing modification of Bax-like molecules. BAD (Bcl-2-associated death promoter, Bcl-2 antagonist of cell death) was described to promote apoptosis by forming heterodimers with the prosurvival proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-X_L, thus preventing them from binding with Bax (10). More recently, two major models have been suggested for how BH3-only proteins may induce apoptosis. In the direct model, all BH3-only proteins promote cell death by directly binding and inactivating their specific anti-death Bcl-2 protein partner (11, 12). In this model, the relative killing potency of different BH3-only proteins is based on their affinities for antiapoptotic proteins. Thus, the activation of Bax/Bak would be mediated through their release from antiapoptotic counterparts. Contrary to this model, Kim et al. (13) provided support for an alternative hierarchy model, in which BH3-only proteins are divided into two distinct subsets. According to this model, the inactivator BH3-only proteins, like BAD, Noxa, and some others, respond directly to survival factors, resulting in phosphorylation, 14-3-3 binding, and suppression of the proapoptotic function. In the absence of growth factors, these proteins engage specifically their preferred antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. The targeted Bcl-2 proteins then release the other subset of BH3-only proteins designated the activators (truncated Bid, Bim, and Puma) that in turn bind to and activate Bax and Bak.Non-phosphorylated BAD associated with Bcl-2/Bcl-X_L is found at the outer mitochondrial membrane. Phosphorylation of specific serine residues, Ser-112 and Ser-136 of mouse BAD (mBAD) or the corresponding phosphorylation sites Ser-75 and Ser-99 of human BAD (hBAD), results in association with 14-3-3 proteins and subsequent relocation of BAD (14, 15). Phosphorylation of mBAD at Ser-155 (Ser-118 of hBAD) within its BH3 domain disrupts the association with Bcl-2 or Bcl-X_L, promoting cell survival (16). Therefore, the phosphorylation status of BAD at these serine residues reflects a checkpoint for cell death or survival. Although the C-RAF kinase was the first reported BAD kinase (17), its target sites were not clearly defined. However, there is a growing body of evidence for direct participation of RAF in regulation of apoptosis via BAD (18, 19). In addition, Kebache et al. (20) reported recently that the interaction between adaptor protein Grb10 and C-RAF is essential for BAD-mediated cell survival. On the other hand, numerous reports suggest that PKA (21), Akt/PKB (22), PAK (18, 23, 24), Cdc2 (25), RSK (26, 27), CK2 (28), and PIM kinases (29) are involved in BAD phosphorylation as well. The involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in BAD phosphorylation is controversially discussed. Whereas Donovan et al. (30) reported that c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylates mBAD at serine 128, Zhang et al. (31) claimed that c-Jun N-terminal kinase is not a BAD-serine 128 kinase. On the other hand, it has been shown that c-Jun N-terminal kinase is able to suppress IL-3 withdrawal-induced apoptosis via phosphorylation of mBAD at threonine 201 (32). Thus, taken together, with respect to regulation of mBAD by phosphorylation, five serine phosphorylation sites (at positions 112, 128, 136, 155, and 170) and two threonines (117 and 201) have been identified so far. Intriguingly, only little data are available regarding the role of phosphorylation in regulation of hBAD protein, although significant structural differences between these two BAD proteins exist.During apoptosis, some members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, such as Bax or Bak, have been shown to induce permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane, allowing proteins in the mitochondrial intermembrane space to escape into the cytosol, where they can initiate caspase activation and cell death (for a review, see Refs. 33 and 34). Despite intensive investigation, the mechanism whereby Bax and Bak induce outer membrane permeability remains controversial (34). Based on crystal structure (35), it became evident that Bcl-X_L has a pronounced similarity to the translocation domain of diphtheria toxin (36), a domain that can form pores in artificial lipid bilayers. This discovery provoked the predominant view that upon commitment to apoptosis, the proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bak also form pores in the outer mitochondrial membrane (37). As expected from the structural considerations, Bcl-X_L was found to form channels in synthetic lipid membranes (38). Since then, other Bcl-2 family members like Bcl-2, Bax, and the BH3-only protein Bid have been reported to have channel-forming ability. These pores can be divided into two different types: proteinaceous channels of defined size and ion specificity (38–42) and large lipidic pores that allow free diffusion of 2-megadalton macromolecules (43, 44). With respect to the BH3-only protein BAD, no pore-forming abilities have been reported so far, although human BAD has been found to possess per se high affinity for negatively charged phospholipids and liposomes, mimicking mitochondrial membranes (14).The RAF kinases (A-, B-, and C-RAF) play a central role in the conserved Ras-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling cascade and mediate cellular responses induced by growth factors (45–47). Direct involvement of C-RAF in inhibition of proapoptotic properties of BAD established a link between signal transduction and apoptosis control (48, 49). However, the early works did not identify the exact RAF phosphorylation sites on BAD (17). Here we demonstrate that hBAD serves as a substrate of RAF isoforms. With respect to hBAD phosphorylation by PKA, Akt/PKB, and PAK1 in vivo, we observed different specificity compared with RAF kinases. hBAD phosphorylation by RAF was accompanied by reduced apoptosis in HEK293 cells (transformed human embryonic kidney cells) and NIH 3T3 cells (a mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line). Furthermore, we show that in vitro phosphorylation of hBAD by RAF at serines 75, 99, and 118 regulates the binding of 14-3-3 proteins and association with Bcl-2 and Bcl-X_L. By use of mass spectrometry, we detected several novel in vivo phosphorylation sites of hBAD in addition to the established phosphorylation sites, serines 75, 99, and 118. Finally, we show here that hBAD forms channels in planar bilayer membranes in vitro. This pore-forming capacity was dependent on phosphorylation status and interaction with 14-3-3 proteins.