RNA Binding and Core Complexes Constitute the U-Insertion/Deletion Editosome

Enzymes embedded into the RNA editing core complex (RECC) catalyze the U-insertion/deletion editing cascade to generate open reading frames in trypanosomal mitochondrial mRNAs. The sequential reactions of mRNA cleavage, U-addition or removal, and ligation are directed by guide RNAs (gRNAs). We combined proteomic, genetic, and functional studies with sequencing of total and complex-bound RNAs to define a protein particle responsible for the recognition of gRNAs and pre-mRNA substrates, editing intermediates, and products. This approximately 23-polypeptide tripartite assembly, termed the RNA editing substrate binding complex (RESC), also functions as the interface between mRNA editing, polyadenylation, and translation. Furthermore, we found that gRNAs represent only a subset of small mitochondrial RNAs, and yet an inexplicably high fraction of them possess 3′ U-tails, which correlates with gRNA''s enrichment in the RESC. Although both gRNAs and mRNAs are associated with the RESC, their metabolic fates are distinct: gRNAs are degraded in an editing-dependent process, whereas edited mRNAs undergo 3′ adenylation/uridylation prior to translation. Our results demonstrate that the well-characterized editing core complex (RECC) and the RNA binding particle defined in this study (RESC) typify enzymatic and substrate binding macromolecular constituents, respectively, of the ∼40S RNA editing holoenzyme, the editosome.     

Implications of novel guide RNA features for the mechanism of RNA editing in Crithidia fasciculata.

We have determined the relative steady state concentration of the two Crithidia fasciculata guide (g)RNAs involved in editing the two domains of mRNAs for NADH dehydrogenase (ND) subunit 7. We found that, although there was an 8-fold difference between the molar ratio of these two gRNAs relative to the (pre)-mRNA, the two domains are edited with a very similar frequency (around 50%). Also, for the editing of a given domain, many gRNA species exist with the same 5' end but with a different 3' uridylation site. Approximately 20% of these short gRNAs do not contain the information required for editing a complete domain, which may explain the high incidence of partially edited RNAs. Remarkably, genomically encoded Us are missing from two sites of a few of the gRNAs involved in editing apocytochrome b RNA. We speculate that these species are created by editing-like events. Both the short and complete forms of the ND7 gRNAs are found in chimeric molecules, in which the gRNA is covalently linked via its 3'-terminus to an editing site of pre-edited ND7 RNA. Some features of the chimeric molecules are at odds with current models of RNA editing: (i) U residues are completely absent from the connecting sequence of a number of these molecules, (ii) the ND7 gRNAs are frequently hooked up to the wrong editing domain of ND7 RNA, although other gRNAs are not found at these positions and (iii) in some chimeric molecules the gRNA appears to be linked to the 5' end of pre-edited RNA.     

RNA-binding properties of the mitochondrial Y-box protein RBP16

We have previously identified a mitochondrial Y-box protein in Trypanosoma brucei that we designated RBP16. The predicted RBP16 amino acid sequence revealed the presence of a cold-shock domain at its N-terminus and a glycine- and arginine-rich C-terminus reminiscent of an RGG RNA-binding motif. Since RBP16 is capable of interacting with different guide RNAs (gRNAs) in vitro and in vivo primarily via the oligo(U) tail, as well as with ribosomal RNAs, possible functions of RBP16 may be in kinetoplastid RNA editing and/or translation. Herein, we report experiments that further define the RNA-binding properties of RBP16. RBP16 forms a single stable complex with the gRNA gA6[14] at low protein concentration, while at higher protein concentration two stable complexes that possibly represent two different conformations are observed. Both complexes are stable at relatively high salt and moderate heparin concentrations indicating that the binding of RBP16 to gA6[14] does not rely primarily on ionic interactions. Phenylglyoxal treatment of the protein indicates that arginine residues are important in RNA binding. The minimal length of RNA sequence necessary for the binding of RBP16 was assessed by gel retardation and UV cross-linking competition assays using oligo(U) ribonucleotides of varying lengths (4–40 nt). Although RBP16 can bind to oligonucleotides as small as U₄, its affinity increases with the length of the oligo(U) ribonucleotide, with a dramatic increase in binding efficiency observed when the length is increased to 10 nt. Gel retardation assays employing T.brucei mRNAs demonstrated that, although it acts as a major binding determinant, a 3′ U tail is not an absolute requirement for efficient RBP16–RNA binding. Experiments with oligonucleotides containing U stretches embedded at different positions in oligo(dC) indicated that high-affinity binding requires both a uridine stretch, as well as 5′ and 3′ non-specific sequences. These results suggest a model for the molecular interactions involved in RBP16–RNA binding.     

REH2C Helicase and GRBC Subcomplexes May Base Pair through mRNA and Small Guide RNA in Kinetoplastid Editosomes

Mitochondrial mRNAs in Trypanosoma brucei undergo extensive insertion and deletion of uridylates that are catalyzed by the RNA editing core complex (RECC) and directed by hundreds of small guide RNAs (gRNAs) that base pair with mRNA. RECC is largely RNA-free, and accessory mitochondrial RNA-binding complex 1 (MRB1) variants serve as scaffolds for the assembly of mRNA-gRNA hybrids and RECC. However, the molecular steps that create higher-order holoenzymes (“editosomes”) are unknown. Previously, we identified an RNA editing helicase 2-associated subcomplex (REH2C) and showed that REH2 binds RNA. Here we showed that REH2C is an mRNA-associated ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) subcomplex with editing substrates, intermediates, and products. We isolated this mRNP from mitochondria lacking gRNA-bound RNP (gRNP) subcomplexes and identified REH2-associated cofactors 1 and 2 (^H2F1 and ^H2F2). ^H2F1 is an octa-zinc finger protein required for mRNP-gRNP docking, pre-mRNA and RECC loading, and RNP formation with a short synthetic RNA duplex. REH2 and other eukaryotic DEAH/RHA-type helicases share a conserved regulatory C-terminal domain cluster that includes an oligonucleotide-binding fold. Recombinant REH2 and ^H2F1 constructs associate in a purified complex in vitro. We propose a model of stepwise editosome assembly that entails controlled docking of mRNP and gRNP modules via specific base pairing between their respective mRNA and gRNA cargo and regulatory REH2 and ^H2F1 subunits of the novel mRNP that may control specificity checkpoints in the editing pathway.     

Rational guide RNA engineering for small-molecule control of CRISPR/Cas9 and gene editing

It is important to control CRISPR/Cas9 when sufficient editing is obtained. In the current study, rational engineering of guide RNAs (gRNAs) is performed to develop small-molecule-responsive CRISPR/Cas9. For our purpose, the sequence of gRNAs are modified to introduce ligand binding sites based on the rational design of ligand–RNA pairs. Using short target sequences, we demonstrate that the engineered RNA provides an excellent scaffold for binding small molecule ligands. Although the ‘stem–loop 1’ variants of gRNA induced variable cleavage activity for different target sequences, all ‘stem–loop 3’ variants are well tolerated for CRISPR/Cas9. We further demonstrate that this specific ligand–RNA interaction can be utilized for functional control of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro and in human cells. Moreover, chemogenetic control of gene editing in human cells transfected with all-in-one plasmids encoding Cas9 and designer gRNAs is demonstrated. The strategy may become a general approach for generating switchable RNA or DNA for controlling other biological processes.     

RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei: characterization of gRNA U-tail interactions with partially edited mRNA substrates

Guide RNAs (gRNAs), key components of the RNA editing reaction in Trypanosoma brucei, direct the insertion and deletion of uridylate (U) residues. Analyses of gRNAs reveal three functional elements. The 5′-end of the gRNA contains the anchor, which is responsible for selection and binding to the pre-edited mRNA. The second element (the guiding region) provides the information required for editing. At the 3′-end of the gRNA is a non-encoded U-tail, whose function remains unclear. However, the cleavage–ligation model for editing proposes that the U-tail binds to purine-rich regions upstream of editing sites, thereby strengthening the interaction and holding onto the 5′ cleavage product. Our previous studies demonstrated that the U-tail interacts with upstream sequences and may play roles in both stabilization and tethering. These studies also indicated that the U-tail interactions involved mRNA regions that were to be subsequently edited. This raised the question of what happens to the mRNA–U-tail interaction as editing proceeds in the 3′→5′ direction. We examined gCYb-558 and its U-tail interaction with 5′CYbUT and two partially edited 5′CYb substrates. Our results indicate that the 3′-end of the U-tail interacts with the same sequence in all three mRNAs. Predicted secondary structures using crosslinking data suggest that a similar structure is maintained as editing proceeds. These results indicate that the role of the U-tail may also involve maintenance of important secondary structure motifs.     

In vivo testing of a tobacco plastid DNA segment for guide RNA function in psbL editing

A C-to-U RNA editing event creates a functional initiation codon for translation of the psbL mRNA in tobacco plastids. Small trans-acting guide RNAs (gRNAs) have been shown to be involved in editing site selection in kinetoplastid mitochondria. A computer search of the tobacco plastid genome (ptDNA) identified such a putative gRNA, a 14-nucleotide sequence motif that is complementary to the psbL mRNA, including the A nucleotide required to direct the C-to-U change. The critical A nucleotide of the putative gRNA gene was changed to G by plastid transformation. We report here that the introduced mutation did not abolish psbL editing. Since no other region of the plastid genome contains significant complementarity to the psbL editing site we suggest that, if gRNAs serve as trans-acting factors for plastid psbL mRNA editing, they either have only a limited complementarity to the editing site, or are encoded in the nuclear genome.     

Trypanosoma brucei minicircles encode multiple guide RNAs which can direct editing of extensively overlapping sequences.

Small guide RNAs (gRNAs) may direct RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria. We have characterized multiple gRNA genes from Trypanosoma brucei (EATRO 164), that can specify up to 30% of the editing of the COIII, ND7, ND8, and A6 mRNAs and we have also found that the non-translated region of edited COIII mRNA of strain (EATRO 164) differs from that of another strain. Several of the gRNAs specify overlapping regions of the same mRNA often specifying sequence beyond that required for an anchor duplex with the next gRNA. Some gRNAs have different sequence but specify identical editing of the same region of mRNA. These data indicate a complex gRNA population and consequent complex pattern of editing in T. brucei.     

RNA editing in mitochondrial mRNA of trypanosomatids.

The editing of mRNA coding sequences by the modification, removal or addition of nucleotides has recently been recognized as another form of RNA processing. Studies of the extensive editing of mitochondrial mRNAs in trypanosomatids have revealed the involvement of small guide RNAs (gRNAs) which are encoded by the minicircles of kinetoplast DNA.     

RNA editing: complexity and complications

RNA editing in Trypanosomatids creates functional mitochondrial mRNAs by extensive uridylate (U) insertion and deletion as specified by small guide RNAs (gRNAs). Editing is catalysed by the multiprotein editosome. Over 20 of its protein components have been identified and additional proteins are likely to function in editing and its regulation. The functions of only a few editosome proteins have been determined. Surprisingly, there are related pairs or sets of editosome proteins, and insertion and deletion editing appear to be functionally and perhaps spatially separate. A model for the editosome is proposed, which has a catalysis domain with separate sectors for insertion and deletion editing. It also contains domains for anchor duplex and upstream RNA binding, which position the sequence to be edited in the catalysis domain.