Relationships among shoot sinks for resources exported from nodal roots regulate branch development of distal non-rooted portions of Trifolium repens L

Two manipulative experiments tested hypotheses pertaining to the correlative control exerted by nodal roots on branch development of the distal non-rooted portion of Trifolium repens growing clonally under near-optimal conditions. The two experiments, differing in their pattern of excision to manipulate the number of branches formed at the first 9-10 phytomers distal to the youngest nodal root, each found that after 20 phytomers of growth the total number of lateral branches formed on the primary stolon remained between five and seven regardless of where the branches formed along the stolon. Additional treatments established that nodal roots influenced branch development via relationships among shoot sinks for the root-supplied resources rather than through variation in the supply of such resources induced by fluctuations in photosynthate supply to roots from branches. Regression analysis of data pooled from treatments of both experiments confirmed that shoot-sink relationships for root- supplied resources controlled the branching processes on the non-rooted portion of plants. A disbudding treatment, which removed all the apical and axillary buds present on basal branches, but left other branch tissues intact, increased branch development of the apical region in the same way as did complete excision of the basal lateral branches. The apical buds and the elongation processes occurring immediately proximal to the buds were thus identified as strong sinks for the root-supplied resources. Such results suggest that branch development on the non-rooted shoot portion distal to the youngest nodal root is regulated by competition among sinks for root-derived resources, of limited availability, necessary for the processes of elongation of axillary buds and the primary stolon apical bud.     

Roles for Auxin, Cytokinin, and Strigolactone in Regulating Shoot Branching

Many processes have been described in the control of shoot branching. Apical dominance is defined as the control exerted by the shoot tip on the outgrowth of axillary buds, whereas correlative inhibition includes the suppression of growth by other growing buds or shoots. The level, signaling, and/or flow of the plant hormone auxin in stems and buds is thought to be involved in these processes. In addition, RAMOSUS (RMS) branching genes in pea (Pisum sativum) control the synthesis and perception of a long-distance inhibitory branching signal produced in the stem and roots, a strigolactone or product. Auxin treatment affects the expression of RMS genes, but it is unclear whether the RMS network can regulate branching independently of auxin. Here, we explore whether apical dominance and correlative inhibition show independent or additive effects in rms mutant plants. Bud outgrowth and branch lengths are enhanced in decapitated and stem-girdled rms mutants compared with intact control plants. This may relate to an RMS-independent induction of axillary bud outgrowth by these treatments. Correlative inhibition was also apparent in rms mutant plants, again indicating an RMS-independent component. Treatments giving reductions in RMS1 and RMS5 gene expression, auxin transport, and auxin level in the main stem were not always sufficient to promote bud outgrowth. We suggest that this may relate to a failure to induce the expression of cytokinin biosynthesis genes, which always correlated with bud outgrowth in our treatments. We present a new model that accounts for apical dominance, correlative inhibition, RMS gene action, and auxin and cytokinin and their interactions in controlling the progression of buds through different control points from dormancy to sustained growth.     

Response to strigolactone treatment in chrysanthemum axillary buds is influenced by auxin transport inhibition and sucrose availability

Axillary bud outgrowth is regulated by both environmental cues and internal plant hormone signaling. Central to this regulation is the balance between auxins, cytokinins, and strigolactones. Auxins are transported basipetally and inhibit the axillary bud outgrowth indirectly by either restricting auxin export from the axillary buds to the stem (canalization model) or inducing strigolactone biosynthesis and limiting cytokinin levels (second messenger model). Both models have supporting evidence and are not mutually exclusive. In this study, we used a modified split-plate bioassay to apply different plant growth regulators to isolated stem segments of chrysanthemum and measure their effect on axillary bud growth. Results showed axillary bud outgrowth in the bioassay within 5 days after nodal stem excision. Treatments with apical auxin (IAA) inhibited bud outgrowth which was counteracted by treatments with basal cytokinins (TDZ, zeatin, 2-ip). Treatments with basal strigolactone (GR24) could inhibit axillary bud growth without an apical auxin treatment. GR24 inhibition of axillary buds could be counteracted with auxin transport inhibitors (TIBA and NPA). Treatments with sucrose in the medium resulted in stronger axillary bud growth, which could be inhibited with apical auxin treatment but not with basal strigolactone treatment. These observations provide support for both the canalization model and the second messenger model with, on the one hand, the influence of auxin transport on strigolactone inhibition of axillary buds and, on the other hand, the inhibition of axillary bud growth by strigolactone without an apical auxin source. The inability of GR24 to inhibit bud growth in a sucrose treatment raises an interesting question about the role of strigolactone and sucrose in axillary bud outgrowth and calls for further investigation.     

The role of nodal roots in prostrate clonal herbs: ‘phalanx’ versus ‘guerrilla’

The influence of nodal rooting on branching was studied in three evolutionarily and morphologically diverse species of prostrate clonal herbs: Tradescantia fluminensis (a monocotyledonous extreme ‘phalanx’ species), Calystegia silvatica (a dicotyledonous extreme ‘guerrilla’ species) and Trifolium repens (a dicotyledonous intermediate species). In all three, branch development from axillary buds is regulated by a positive signal produced by roots together with inhibitory influences from both pre-existing branches and shoot apical buds (apical dominance). Responses to nodal roots are cumulative and increased root activity leads to more vigorous bud outgrowth. In the absence of nodal roots, a single basal root system is unable to maintain continued extension growth of the shoot. We suggest that as individual nodal roots and stem internodes are both short-lived in these nodally-rooting clonal species, the plants’ investment in them is minimal. Thus, in contrast to perennial species lacking nodal roots, individual root systems in prostrate clonal herbs are small and stems have little secondary thickening and development of long-distance transport tissues. Hence the decline in extension growth of the shoot in the absence of nodal roots could be linked to the weak development of long-distance transport tissues in their relatively thin horizontal stems and to resource sharing between primary stems and lateral branches (as suggested by the greater retardation of primary stem growth in the more profusely branched ‘phalanx’ species (Trifolium and Tradescantia) than in the weakly branched ‘guerrilla’ species, Calystegia). These findings are consistent with the view that the long-term persistence of genotypes of nodally-rooting prostrate species is dependent upon them encountering the moist conditions required to facilitate the continual development of new young nodal root systems.     

The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport

BACKGROUND: Plants achieve remarkable plasticity in shoot system architecture by regulating the activity of secondary shoot meristems, laid down in the axil of each leaf. Axillary meristem activity, and hence shoot branching, is regulated by a network of interacting hormonal signals that move through the plant. Among these, auxin, moving down the plant in the main stem, indirectly inhibits axillary bud outgrowth, and an as yet undefined hormone, the synthesis of which in Arabidopsis requires MAX1, MAX3, and MAX4, moves up the plant and also inhibits shoot branching. Since the axillary buds of max4 mutants are resistant to the inhibitory effects of apically supplied auxin, auxin and the MAX-dependent hormone must interact to inhibit branching. RESULTS: Here we show that the resistance of max mutant buds to apically supplied auxin is largely independent of the known, AXR1-mediated, auxin signal transduction pathway. Instead, it is caused by increased capacity for auxin transport in max primary stems, which show increased expression of PIN auxin efflux facilitators. The max phenotype is dependent on PIN1 activity, but it is independent of flavonoids, which are known regulators of PIN-dependent auxin transport. CONCLUSIONS: The MAX-dependent hormone is a novel regulator of auxin transport. Modulation of auxin transport in the stem is sufficient to regulate bud outgrowth, independent of AXR1-mediated auxin signaling. We therefore propose an additional mechanism for long-range signaling by auxin in which bud growth is regulated by competition between auxin sources for auxin transport capacity in the primary stem.     

Relative importance of nodal roots and apical buds in the control of branching in Trifolium repens L.

Clonal species are characterised by having a growth form in which roots and shoots originate from the same meristem so that adventitious nodal roots form close to the terminal apical bud of stems. The nature of the relationship between nodal roots and axillary bud growth was investigated in three manipulative experiments on cuttings of a single genotype of Trifolium repens. In the absence of locally positioned nodal roots axillary bud development within the apical bud proceeded normally until it slowed once the subtending leaf had matured to be the second expanded leaf on the stem. Excision of apical tissues indicated that while there was no apical dominance apparent within fully rooted stems and very little in stems with 15 or more unrooted nodes, the outgrowth of the two most distal axillary buds was stimulated by decapitation in stems with intermediate numbers of unrooted nodes. Excision of the basal branches from stems growing without local nodal roots markedly increased the length and/or number of leaves on 14 distally positioned branches. The presence of basal branches therefore prevented the translocation of root-supplied resources (nutrients, water, phytohormones) to the more distally located nodes and this caused the retardation in the outgrowth of their axillary buds. Based on all three experiments we conclude that the primary control of bud outgrowth is exerted by roots via the acropetal transport of root-supplied resources necessary for axillary bud outgrowth and that apical dominance plays a very minor role in the regulation of axillary bud outgrowth in T. repens.     

Competitive canalization of PIN-dependent auxin flow from axillary buds controls pea bud outgrowth

Shoot branching is one of the major determinants of plant architecture. Polar auxin transport in stems is necessary for the control of bud outgrowth by a dominant apex. Here, we show that following decapitation in pea (Pisum sativum L.), the axillary buds establish directional auxin export by subcellular polarization of PIN auxin transporters. Apical auxin application on the decapitated stem prevents this PIN polarization and canalization of laterally applied auxin. These results support a model in which the apical and lateral auxin sources compete for primary channels of auxin transport in the stem to control the outgrowth of axillary buds.     

Regulation of shoot branching patterns by the basal root system: towards a predictive model

This study aimed to underpin the development of a generic predictivemodel of the regulation of shoot branching by roots in nodallyrooting perennial prostrate-stemmed species using knowledgegained from physiological studies of Trifolium repens. Experiment1 demonstrated that the net stimulatory influence from the basalrooted region of the plant on growth of newly emerging axillarybuds on the primary stem decreased as their phytomeric distancefrom the basal root system increased. Experiment 2 found thatat any one time the distribution of net root stimulus (NRS)to the apical bud on the primary stem and all lateral brancheswas fairly uniform within a single plant. Thus, although NRSavailability was uniform throughout the shoot system at anypoint in time, it progressively decreased as shoot apical budsgrew away from the basal root system. Based on these findings,a preliminary predictive model of the physiological regulationof branching pattern was developed. This model can explain thedecline in growth rate of buds on a primary stem as it growsaway from its basal root system but not the rapid progressivedecline in secondary branch development on successive lateralbranches. Thus knowledge of NRS availability to emerging budsis not, by itself, a sufficient basis from which to constructa predictive model. In addition, it seems that the ability ofan emerging bud to become activated in response to its localNRS availability is, at least in part, directly influenced bythe activation level of its parent apical bud. The experimentaltesting of this hypothesis, required for continued developmentof the model, is proceeding. Key words: Axillary bud outgrowth, branch development, bud activation, intra-plant variation, nodal roots, prostrate clonal herbs, root signals, Trifolium repens Received 11 September 2007; Revised 25 November 2007 Accepted 18 January 2008     

A developmentally based categorization of branching in Trifolium repens L.: influence of nodal roots

This study describes the successive stages of development of branches from axillary buds in fully rooted plants of Trifolium repens grown in near optimal conditions, and the way in which this developmental pathway differs when nodal root formation is prevented as plants grow out from a rooted base. Cuttings of a single genotype were established in a glasshouse with nodal root systems on the two basal phytomers and grown on so that nodal rooting was either permitted (+R) or prevented (-R). In +R plants, axillary tissues could be assigned to one of four developmental categories: unemerged buds, emerged buds, unbranched lateral branches or secondarily branched lateral branches. In -R plants, branch development was retarded, with the retardation becoming increasingly pronounced as the number of -R phytomers on the primary stolon increased. Retarded elongation of the internodes of lateral shoots on -R plants resulted in the formation of a distinct fifth developmental category: short shoots (defined as branches with two or more leaves but with mean internode length equal to, or less than, 10% of that of the immediately proximal internode on the parent stolon) which had reduced phytomer appearance rates but retained the potential to develop into lateral branches. Transfer of +R plants to -R conditions, and vice versa, after 66 d demonstrated that subsequent branch development was wholly under the control of the youngest nodal root present, regardless of the age and number of root systems proximal to it.     

Effect of plant growth substances on the growth of axillary buds in cultured stem segments of Phaseolus vulgaris L.

The hormonal control of axillary bud growth was investigated in cultured stem segments of Phaseolus vulgaris L. When the stem explants were excised and implanted with their apical end in a solid nutrient medium, outgrowth of the axillary buds-located at the midline of the segment-was induced. However, if indoleacetic acid (IAA) or naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was included in the medium, bud growth was inhibited. The exposure of the apical end to IAA also caused bud abscission and prevented the appearance of new lateral buds.In contrast to apically inserted segments, those implanted in the control medium with their basal end showed much less bud growth. In these segments, the auxin added to the medium either had no effect or caused a slight stimulation of bud growth.The IAA transport inhibitor N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) relieved bud growth inhibition by IAA. This suggests that the effect of IAA applied at the apical end requires the transport of IAA itself rather than a second factor. With the apical end of the segment inserted into the IAA-containing medium, simultaneous basal application of IAA relieved to some extent the inhibitory effect of the apical IAA treatment. These results, together with data presented in a related article [Lim R and Tamas I (1989) Plant Growth Regul 8: 151–164], show that the polarity of IAA transport is a critical factor in the control of axillary bud growth.Of the IAA conjugates tested for their effect on axillary bud growth, indoleacetyl alanine, indoleacetic acid ethyl ester, indoleacetyl-myo-inositol and indoleacetyl glucopyranose were strongly inhibitory when they were applied to the apical end of the stem explants. There was a modest reduction of growth by indoleacetyl glycine and indoleacetyl phenylalanine. Indoleacetyl aspartic acid and indoleglyoxylic acid had no effect.In addition to IAA and its conjugates, a number of other plant growth substances also affected axillary bud growth when applied to the apical end of stem segments. Myo-inositol caused some increase in the rate of growth, but it slightly enhanced the inhibitory effect of IAA when the two substances were added together. Gibberellic acid (GA₃) caused some stimulation of bud growth when the explants were from younger, rather than older plants. The presence of abscisic acid (ABA) in the medium had no effect on axillary bud growth. Both kinetin and zeatin caused some inhibition of axillary buds from younger plants but had the opposite effect on buds from older ones. Kinetin also enhanced the inhibitory effect of IAA when the two were applied together.In conclusion, axillary buds of cultured stem segments showed great sensitivity to auxins and certain other substances. Their growth responded to polarity effects and the interaction among different substances. Therefore, the use of cultured stem segments seems to offer a convenient, sensitive and versatile test system for the study of axillary bud growth regulation.     

Cumulative activation of axillary buds by nodal roots in Trifolium repens L

In Trifolium repens the rate of outgrowth of an axillary bud was closely correlated with its duration of exposure to a nearby nodal root. The dose-dependent nature of this relationship, over 0-22 d, is consistent with the concept that axillary buds are cumulatively activated by a root signal (RS) such that the longer they receive the signal the higher is their level of activation and hence their rate of outgrowth. Furthermore, the activation level attained by a bud was subsequently retained following the excision of the nodal root providing the source of its activation: its rate of growth 3-6 weeks after root excision still reflected the initial level of activation of the bud. Thus, once activated, a bud required relatively little RS to maintain its rate of outgrowth, implying that activation involves the establishment of an autonomous control mechanism within the bud itself. This provides an explanation of how a strongly activated apical bud can continue growth at relatively low RS levels when it is distanced from its nearest root system, while at the same time the prevailing low RS environment leads to weak activation of the axillary buds emerging from it.     

CONTROL OF SHOOT-RHIZOME DIMORPHISM IN THE WOODY MONOCOTYLEDON,CORDYLINE (AGAVACEAE)

In Cordyline terminalis negatively geotropic leafy shoots and positively geotropic rhizomes develop from single axillary buds on either shoots or rhizomes. All axillary buds have similar morphogenetic potential when released from apical dominance. Experiments in which the orientation of the apex is changed, organs removed, or growth regulators applied indicate that after a rhizome is initiated, it is maintained as a rhizome by auxin originating in the leafy shoot. When auxin levels are lowered by changes in the orientation of the axis or shoot removal, the rhizome apex becomes a shoot apex, which appears to be the stable state of the actively growing apex. Benzyl adenine when applied exogenously to the apex or lateral buds has the same effect as lowering the auxin level. Gibberellic acid has no effect on the apex or lateral buds. High levels of exogenous naphthaleneacetic acid cause bud release and development of rhizomes from previously inhibited axillary buds of the shoot. However, it was not possible to convert a shoot apex into a rhizome apex by auxin treatment. It is suggested that the release of buds on the lower side of horizontal branches and of buds directly above a stem girdle is caused by high auxin levels on the lower side or distal to the girdle. The experimental results are discussed in relation to naturally occurring shoot-rhizome dimorphism.     

Mutual interaction of auxin and cytokinins in regulating correlative dominance

Correlative dominance requires correlative signals from a dominant to a dominated organ. Auxins, particularly IAA, and cytokinins are obviously important components of this correlative system. Using a vegetative pea shoot and a generative apple and tomato fruit system it can be demonstrated that dominant organs always export more IAA and have a higher ³H-IAA transport capacity and velocity compared to dominated organs. In both systems the dominant organ can be replaced by the application of auxin, e.g. NAA, which maintains the differences in IAA export. This is an indication that similar regulatory mechanisms control dominance in both of these diverse systems. The possibility of replacing a dominant organ by auxin also makes it unlikely that growth of that organ or allocation of nutrients regulates the correlative inhibition of the dominated organ.It is suggested that differences in IAA export from, and transport capacities of, dominant and dominated shoots, may be explained by a mechanism of auxin transport autoinhibition (ATA), whereby the earlier and stronger export of IAA from the dominant shoot inhibits auxin export from the dominated shoot at the point where the two auxin streams converge. This hypothesis was tested with explants of pea, apple and tomato. It was shown that the basal application of cold IAA significantly reduced endogenous as well as exogenous IAA transport through these explants.Since the reduced IAA transport of dominated organs was not followed by an accumulation of IAA in the auxin producing subtending organ, it was concluded that IAA biosynthesis was possibly reduced and/or IAA conjugation stimulated. This could have been one of the determinants of their growth inhibition. ATA might also explain how the unidirectional IAA signal may affect the growth rate of organs even lateral or acropetal to its transport pathway and thus polar IAA-transport becomes a ``multidirectional' signal. From the experiments demonstrated it seems that ATA is a sufficient mechanism to impose growth inhibition in the dominated organ, without the need of other regulators.However, to release dominated organs from dominance cessation of ATA may not be sufficient and cytokinins are obviously a powerful antagonist to auxins. Their repeated exogenous application turns dominated lateral buds into strongly growing organs which ultimately may even dominate the previously dominant apex. These lateral shoots finally gain a strong IAA export capacity and inhibit, by ATA, IAA export from the hitherto dominant apex.In other experiments it was shown that interruption of polar IAA transport leads to a strong increase in root derived cytokinins. This can largely be prevented, in a concentration dependent manner, by the application of auxin, indicating that basipolar auxin may control cytokinin production in the roots and its possible delivery to lateral buds. In turn, the increased delivery of cytokinins to the lateral buds promotes a strong increase in IAA production and export. Thus there is a strong mutual interaction between auxin production in the shoots and cytokinin production in the roots, which may be important in regulating the balance between root and shoot growth.     

The Effects of Temperature and Other Variables on the Contribution of Lateral Branches to Yield in Phaseolus vulgaris L.

At low temperatures (15/15 °C day/night) in controlled environmentsthe growth of lateral branches at the cotyledonary node ofPhaseolusvulgarts L is suppressed The suppression can be overcome byraising the temperature of the buds by approximately 6 °Cwith small electric heaters In order to test the practical significanceof the induction of branching for yields of the commercial crop,seedlings were raised in contrasted regimes and then transplantedto the field The effects of pretreatment regime on final yieldwere small, changes in the yield from axillary branches tendedto be balanced by compensatory changes in the yield from themain stem In another field experiment, synthetic growth substanceswere applied in order to suppress or enhance branching Changesin the amount of yield carned on branches were again offsetby compensatory changes in the yield from the main stem Compensatoryeffects between branches and main stem were also found in avariety trial However, in an experiment on a single cultivarand various levels of N fertilizer, compensatory effects werenot found, here, branch and main stem yields were positively,rather than negatively, correlated These results are discussedin relation to the intrinsic factors that govern yield in Pvulgaris Phaseolus vulgaris L, dwarf bean, axillary branches, correlative inhibition, temperature, growth substances, plant density, yield     

Highly Branched Phenotype of the Petunia dad1-1 Mutant Is Reversed by Grafting

The recessive dad1-1 allele conditions a highly branched growth habit resulting from a proliferation of first- and second-order branches. Unlike the wild-type parent, which has lateral branching delayed until the third or fourth leaf node distal to the cotyledons, dad1-1 initiates lateral branching from each cotyledon axil. In addition to initiating lateral branching sooner than the wild type, dad1-1 sustains branching through more nodes on the main shoot axis than the wild type. In keeping with a propensity for branching at basal nodes, dad1-1 produces second-order branches at the proximal-most nodes on first-order branches and small shoots from accessory buds at basal nodes on the main shoot axis. Additional traits associated with the mutation are late flowering, adventitious root formation, shortened internodes, and mild leaf chlorosis. Graft studies show that a dad1-1 scion, when grafted onto wild-type stock, is converted to a phenotype resembling the wild type. Furthermore, a small wild-type interstock fragment inserted between a mutant root stock and a mutant scion is sufficient to convert the dad1-1 scion from mutant to a near wild-type appearance. The recessive dad1-1 phenotype combines traits associated with cytokinin overexpression, auxin overexpression, and gibberellin limitation, which suggests a complex interaction of hormones in establishing the mutant phenotype.     

Evidence suggests plagiotropic clonal species have evolved a branching physiology emphasizing regulation by nodal roots

In the plagiotropic nodally rooting clonal herb, Trifolium repens,the development of branches on stems is primarily controlled by the presence of nodal roots, and apical dominance is of secondary importance; only six to ten branches form distal to the youngest nodal root on a horizontal stem. We assessed the hypothesis that this phenomenon is general for clonal herbs with prostrate nodally rooting stems, and that they all have the same physiological system regulating branching, by testing a selection of species from diverse angiosperm families that exhibit either phalanx (Leptinella (Asteraceae), Hydrocotyle (Apiaceae), Acaena (Rosaceae)) or guerilla (Vinca (Apocynaceae), Glechoma and Lamiastrum (Lamiaceae)) growth strategies. In all these species the establishment of a single nodal root on a prostrate stem, otherwise prevented from nodally rooting, induced the outgrowth of a limited number of axillary buds (the number of which was species specific) at the nodes immediately distal to the newly established root, thereby indicating a phenotypic response similar to that in T. repens. Furthermore, their branching responses to manipulative treatments were also similar to those of T. repens, indicating that their regulatory physiology of axillary bud outgrowth from their prostrate stems is similar. We conclude that, for the group of prostrate nodally rooting clonal herbs as a whole, the apical dominance phenotype arises predominantly from variation in the supply of resources from nodal roots rather than from repression of axillary buds by apical tissues (apical dominance). We suggest that evolution of such a physiological mechanism enhances the exploration for patchily distributed favourable nodal rooting sites by regulating shoot development so as to efficiently utilise the diminishing intra-plant availability of root-supplied resources. For the species examined, inter-specific variation in intensity of branching response to a nodal root is shown to be linked to a trade off in foraging strategy, with the allocation of resources primarily to explorative growth (long internodes, few branches) in guerilla species or to exploitive growth (short internodes, many branches) in phalanx species.Co-ordinating editor: J. Tuomi     

Regulation of shoot branching by auxin

The idea that apically derived auxin inhibits shoot branching by inhibiting the activity of axillary buds was first proposed 70 years ago, but it soon became clear that its mechanism of action was complex and indirect. Recent advances in the study of axillary bud development and of auxin signal transduction are allowing a better understanding of the role of auxin in controlling shoot branching. These studies have identified a new role for auxin early in bud development as well as some of the second messengers involved in mediating the branch-inhibiting effects of auxin.