Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes have a pentameric quaternary structure

We have determined the subunit stoichiometry of chicken neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes by quantitation of the amount of radioactivity in individual subunits of [35S] methionine-labeled receptors. The chicken neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor appears to be a pentamer of two alpha 4 acetylcholine-binding subunits and three beta 2 structural subunits. We also show that these expressed receptors bind L-[3H]nicotine with high affinity, are transported to the surface of the oocyte outer membrane, and cosediment on sucrose gradients with acetylcholine receptors isolated from chicken brain. Using this unique and generally applicable method of determining subunit stoichiometry of receptors expressed in oocytes, we obtained the expected (alpha 1) 2 beta 1 gamma delta stoichiometry for muscle-type acetylcholine receptors assembled from coexpression of either Torpedo alpha 1 or human alpha 1 subunits, with Torpedo beta 1, gamma, and delta subunits.     

Protein phosphorylation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAcChR) is a ligand-gated ion channel found in the postsynaptic membranes of electric organs, at the neuromuscular junction, and at nicotinic cholinergic synapses of the mammalian central and peripheral nervous system. The nAcChR from Torpedo electric organ and mammalian muscle is the most well-characterized neurotransmitter receptor in biology. It has been shown to be comprised of five homologous (two identicle) protein subunits (alpha 2 beta gamma delta) that form both the ion channel and the neurotransmitter receptor. The nAcChR has been purified and reconstituted into lipid vesicles with retention of ion channel function and the primary structure of all four protein subunits has been determined. Protein phosphorylation is a major posttranslational modification known to regulate protein function. The Torpedo nAcChR was first shown to be regulated by phosphorylation by the discovery that postsynaptic membranes contain protein kinases that phosphorylate the nAcChR. Phosphorylation of the nAcChR has since been shown to be regulated by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase, protein kinase C, and a tyrosine-specific protein kinase. Phosphorylation of the nAcChR by cAMP-dependent protein kinase has been shown to increase the rate of nAcChR desensitization, the process by which the nAcChR becomes inactivated in the continued presence of agonist. In cultured muscle cells, phosphorylation of the nAcChR has been shown to be regulated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase, a Ca2+-sensitive protein kinase, and a tyrosine-specific protein kinase. Stimulation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase in muscle also increases the rate of nAcChR desensitization and correlates well with the increase in nAcChR phosphorylation. The AcChR represents a model system for how receptors and ion channels are regulated by second messengers and protein phosphorylation.     

Structural organization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor of the electric ray Torpedo is the most comprehensively characterized neurotransmitter receptor. It consists of five subunits (alpha2beta gammadelta) amino acid sequences of which were determined by cDNA cloning and sequencing. The shape and size of the receptor were determined by electron cryomicroscopy. It has two agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites which are located between subunits near the membrane surface. The receptor ion channel is formed by five transmembrane helices (M2) of all five subunits. The position of the binding site for noncompetitive ion channel blockers was found by photoaffinity labelling and site-directed mutagenesis. The intrinsic feature of the receptor structure is the position of the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites in close vicinity to the ion channel spanning the bilayer membrane. This peculiarity may substantially enhance allosteric transitions transforming the ligand binding into the channel opening and physiological response. Muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from birds and mammals are also pentaoligomers consisting of four different subunits (alpha2beta gammadelta or alpha2beta epsilondelta) with high homology to the Torpedo receptor. Apparently, the pentaoligomeric structure is the main feature of all nicotinic, both muscle and neuronal, receptors. However, the neuronal receptors are formed only by two subunit types (alpha and beta) or are even pentahomomers (alpha7 neuronal receptors). All nicotinic receptors are ligand-gated ion channel, the properties of the channels being essentially determined by amino acid residues forming M2 transmembrane fragments.     

A transmembrane site determines sensitivity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to general anesthetics

Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are potential targets for a wide variety of general anesthetics. We recently showed that alpha(4)beta(2) nAChRs are more sensitive than alpha(4)beta(4) receptors to the gaseous anesthetics nitrous oxide and xenon. The present study examines chimeric and point mutant rat nAChRs expressed in Xenopus oocytes and identifies a single amino acid residue (beta(2)-Val(253) or beta(4)-Phe(255)) near the middle of the second transmembrane segment (TM2) that determines gaseous anesthetic sensitivity. Mutations of this residue in beta subunits and the homologous residue of alpha(4) subunits (alpha(4)-Val(254)) showed that this position also determines sensitivities of nAChRs to acetylcholine, isoflurane, pentobarbital, and hexanol. In contrast, these mutations did not affect actions of ketamine. The positively charged sulfhydryl-specific reagent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium reacted with a cysteine introduced at alpha(4)-Val(254) or beta(2)-Val(253), and irreversibly reduced anesthetic sensitivities of nAChRs. Propyl methanethiosulfonate is an anesthetic analog that covalently binds to a TM2 site of gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) and glycine receptors and irreversibly enhances receptor function. However, propyl methanethiosulfonate reversibly inhibited cysteine-substitution mutants at alpha(4)-Val(254) or beta(2)-Val(253) of nAChRs, and did not affect anesthetic sensitivity. Thus, residues alpha(4)-Val(254) and beta(2)-Val(253) alter channel gating and determine anesthetic sensitivity of nAChRs, but are not likely to be anesthetic-binding sites.     

Molecular mechanisms and binding site locations for noncompetitive antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are pentameric proteins that belong to the Cys-loop receptor superfamily. Their essential mechanism of functioning is to couple neurotransmitter binding, which occurs at the extracellular domain, to the opening of the membrane-spanning cation channel. The function of these receptors can be modulated by structurally different compounds called noncompetitive antagonists. Noncompetitive antagonists may act at least by two different mechanisms: a steric and/or an allosteric mechanism. The simplest idea representing a steric mechanism is that the antagonist molecule physically blocks the ion channel. On the other hand, there exist distinct allosteric mechanisms. For example, noncompetitive antagonists may bind to the receptor and stabilize a nonconducting conformational state (e.g., resting or desensitized state), and/or increase the receptor desensitization rate. Barbiturates, dissociative anesthetics, antidepressants, and neurosteroids have been shown to inhibit nicotinic receptors by allosteric mechanisms and/or by open- and closed-channel blockade. Receptor modulation has proved to be highly complex for most noncompetitive antagonists. Noncompetitive antagonists may act by more than one mechanism and at distinct sites in the same receptor subtype. The binding site location for one particular molecule depends on the conformational state of the receptor. The mechanisms of action and binding affinities of noncompetitive antagonists differ among nicotinic receptor subtypes. Knowledge of the structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, the location of its noncompetitive antagonist binding sites, and the mechanisms of inhibition will aid the design of new and more efficacious drugs for treatment of neurological diseases.     

Structure-function relationships in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

1. A combination of molecular, biochemical, electrophysiological and immunological approaches has begun to resolve some of the questions about structure-function relationships of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AchRs). 2. Current structural studies suggest that models of the subunits which propose four transmembrane domains are correct. 3. It is also probable that the carboxy termini of the subunits are extracellular, while the putative amphpathic helix is intracellular. 4. Electrophysiological and ligand-binding experiments suggest that the M2 region forms the wall of the ion channel. 5. We have isolated clones from PC12 and rat brain cDNA libraries which we have shown, by functional expression, code for members of a gene family of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits. 6. In situ hybridization studies have shown that the neuronal receptor subunit mRNAs are expressed in the mammalian central nervous system. 7. The muscle and neuronal nicotinic AchR subtypes we have expressed show differences in their pharmacological properties. 8. The isolation and identification of clones which code for receptors and voltage-activated ion channels will help in the understanding of a variety of disease states and assist in the design of drugs which are specific for unique molecular targets.     

Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from protein structure to function

Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are a prototype of ligand-gated channels that mediate transmission in the central and peripheral nervous system. Structure-function studies performed at the amino acid level are now unraveling the determinant residues either for the properties of the ligand-binding domain or the ionic pore. In this work we review, in the light of the latest finding, the structure-function relationship of these receptors and their implication in neurological diseases.     

Emerging structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

The conversion of acetylcholine binding into ion conduction across the membrane is becoming more clearly understood in terms of the structure of the receptor and its transitions. A high-resolution structure of a protein that is homologous to the extracellular domain of the receptor has revealed the binding sites and subunit interfaces in great detail. Although the structures of the membrane and cytoplasmic domains are less well determined, the channel lining and the determinants of selectivity have been mapped. The location and structure of the gates, and the coupling between binding sites and gates, remain to be established.     

Activation of skeletal muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Summary and Conclusions Work over the past ten years has greatly increased our understanding of both the structure and function of the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. There is a strongly supported general picture of how the receptor functions: agonist binds rapidly to sites of low affinity and channel opening occurs at a rate comparable to the agonist dissociation rate. Channel closing is slow, so the channel has a high probability of being open if both agonist-binding sites are occupied by ACh. Results of expression studies have shown that each subunit can influence AChR activation and have given a structural basis for the major physiological change known for muscle AChR, the developmental change in AChR activation. These general statements notwithstanding, there are still major areas of uncertainty which limit our understanding. We have emphasized these areas of uncertainty in this review, to indicate what needs to be done.First, the quantitative estimates of rate constants are not as strongly supported as they should be. The major reasons are twofold—uncertainties about the interpretation of components in the kinetic data and difficulties of resolving brief events. As a result, any inferences about the functional consequences of structural alterations must remain tenuous.Second, the functional behavior of individual AChRs is not as well understood as it should be. The kinetic behavior of an individual receptor clearly can be complex (section II). In addition, there is evidence that superimposed on this complexity there may be stable and kinetically distinguishable populations of receptors (section III). Until the basis for the kinetically defined populations is clarified, kinetic parameters for receptors of defined structure cannot be unambiguously obtained.Finally, it is not surprising that the studies of AChR of altered structure have not given definitive results. Two reasons should be apparent from the preceding points: there is not a fully supported approach for kinetic analysis, and the normal population may not be clearly defined. An additional complication is also emerging, in that the available data support the idea that specific residues distributed over all subunits may influence AChR activation. This possibility renders the task of analysis that much more difficult.The muscle nicotinic AChR has served as a prototype for the family of transmitter-gated membrane channels, which includes the muscle and neuronal nicotinic receptors, the GABA_A, the glycine and possibly the non-NMDA excitatory amino acid receptor (Stroud et al., 1990). It is interesting to note that the functional properties of the GABA_A receptor, probably the best-studied of the other members of the family are rather similar. In particular, opentime and burst durations show multiple components interpreted as reflecting openings of singly and doubly liganded receptors (Mathers & Wang, 1988; Macdonald et al., 1989), the distribution of gaps indicates a relatively complex gating scheme (Twyman et al., 1990; Weiss & Magleby, 1989), and multiple kinetic modes are likely to exist (Newland et al., 1991). The situation with regards to the effects of GABA_A receptor subunit stoichiometry is more complex than for muscle AChR (e.g., Luddens & Wisden, 1991), perhaps similar to that found for neuronal nicotinic AChR (Papke et al., 1989; Luetje et al., 1990; Luetje & Patrick, 1991). Overall, it appears that the unresolved questions about the muscle nicotinic AChR are not indications that this is an exceptionally complicated transmitter-gated channel. Rather, it appears to be a relatively straightforward member of the family, and the lessons we learn from studying it are likely to be directly applicable to other receptors.We thank many friends for discussion, including Tony Auerbach, Paul Brehm, Jim Dilger, Meyer Jackson, and Chuck Stevens who told us about data before publication. Research in the authors' laboratories is supported by grants from the NIH (CL and JHS) and the AHA (CL).     

Inorganic, monovalent cations compete with agonists for the transmitter binding site of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

The properties of adult mouse recombinant nicotinic acetylcholine receptors activated by acetylcholine (ACh+) or tetramethylammonium (TMA+) were examined at the single-channel level. The midpoint of the dose-response curve depended on the type of monovalent cation present in the extracellular solution. The shifts in the midpoint were apparent with both inward and outward currents, suggesting that the salient interaction is with the extracellular domain of the receptor. Kinetic modeling was used to estimate the rate constants for agonist binding and channel gating in both wild-type and mutant receptors exposed to Na+, K+, or Cs+. The results indicate that in adult receptors, the two binding sites have the same equilibrium dissociation constant for agonists. The agonist association rate constant was influenced by the ionic composition of the extracellular solution whereas the rate constants for agonist dissociation, channel opening, and channel closing were not. In low-ionic-strength solutions the apparent association rate constant increased in a manner that suggests that inorganic cations are competitive inhibitors of ACh+ binding. There was no evidence of an electrostatic potential at the transmitter binding site. The equilibrium dissociation constants for inorganic ions (Na+, 151 mM; K+, 92 mM; Cs+, 38 mM) and agonists (TMA+, 0.5 mM) indicate that the transmitter binding site is hydrophobic. Under physiological conditions, about half of the binding sites in resting receptors are occupied by Na+.     

Structure-activity relationships of alpha-conotoxins targeting neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

alpha-Conotoxins that target the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor have a range of potential therapeutic applications and are valuable probes for examining receptor subtype selectivity. The three-dimensional structures of about half of the known neuronal specific alpha-conotoxins have now been determined and have a consensus fold containing a helical region braced by two conserved disulfide bonds. These disulfide bonds define the two-loop framework characteristic for alpha-conotoxins, CCX(m)CX(n)C, where loop 1 comprises four residues (m = 4) and loop 2 between three and seven residues (n = 3, 6 or 7). Structural studies, particularly using NMR spectroscopy have provided an insight into the role and spatial location of residues implicated in receptor binding and biological activity.     

The role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in Alzheimer's disease.

The two hallmark lesions of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are extracellular amyloid plaques, mainly formed by a small peptide called amyloid-beta (Abeta), and neurofibrillary tangles, which are intracellular inclusions formed by aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau protein. One of the major neurochemical features of AD is the marked reduction of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in disease-relevant brain regions such as the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. This loss is further compounded by the loss of cholinergic cells, which contributes to the cognitive dysfunction. This observation has had a major impact on therapeutic treatments, as efforts to restore cholinergic function such as the administration of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have been, until recently, the major treatment options available for AD. Understanding the relationship of these hallmark lesions with the plethora of other changes that occur in the AD brain has proven to be a difficult challenge to resolve. The utilization of transgenic mouse models, that recapitulate one or more neuropathological and neurochemical features of the AD brain is providing some inroads, as they offer a means to gain mechanistic insights into the disease process in an in vivo setting. In this review, we consider the role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in transgenic models and in AD.     

The lipid/protein interface as xenobiotic target site: kinetic analysis of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Membrane proteins are known to be solvated and functionally activated by a fixed number of lipid molecules whose multiple binding can be described by Adair-type binding equations. Lipophilic xenobiotics such as general anesthetics may act by competitive displacement of protein-bound lipids. A kinetic equation is now presented for various binding stoichiometries of lipid and xenobiotic, and microscopic binding constants of anesthetics and organic solvents are derived from two independent assay systems for the enhancement of agonist binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. These constants lead to the first available free energy estimate (-6.4 kcal/mol) for the binding of membrane lipid to an integral membrane protein.     

Aryloxyethylamines: binding at alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Structure-affinity relationships for the binding of 3-[2-(N,N,N-trimethylammonium)ethoxy]pyridine (AXPQ) at alpha7 nACh receptors were investigated due to its close structural similarity to a known alpha7 antagonist.     

Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from Drosophila: two different types of alpha subunits coassemble within the same receptor complex

Although neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from insects have been reconstituted in vitro more than a decade ago, our knowledge about the subunit composition of native receptors as well as their functional properties still remains limited. Immunohistochemical evidence has suggested that two alpha subunits, alpha-like subunit (ALS) and Drosophila alpha2 subunit (Dalpha2), are colocalized in the synaptic neuropil of the Drosophila CNS and therefore may be subunits of the same receptor complex. To gain further understanding of the composition of these nicotinic receptors, we have examined the possibility that a receptor may imbed more than one alpha subunit using immunoprecipitations and electrophysiological investigations. Immunoprecipitation experiments of fly head extracts revealed that ALS-specific antibodies coprecipitate Dalpha2, and vice versa, and thereby suggest that these two alpha subunits must be contained within the same receptor complex, a result that is supported by investigations of reconstituted receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Discrimination between binary (ALS/beta2 or Dalpha2/beta2) and ternary (ALS/Dalpha2/beta2) receptor complexes was made on the basis of their dose-response curve to acetylcholine as well as their sensitivity to alpha-bungarotoxin or dihydro-beta-erythroidine. These data demonstrate that the presence of the two alpha subunits within a single receptor complex confers new receptor properties that cannot be predicted from knowledge of the binary receptor's properties.     

Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor binding affinities of boron-containing nicotine analogues

A series of boron-containing nicotine (NIC) analogues 7-9 was synthesized and evaluated for binding to alpha4beta2 and alpha7 nicotinic receptors. Compound ACME-B inhibited [3H]methyllycaconitine binding to rat brain membranes with a similar potency compared to NIC (Ki = 2.4 and 0.77 microM, respectively), but was markedly less potent in inhibiting [3H]NIC binding when compared to NIC (Ki = 0.60 microM and 1.0 nM, respectively). Thus, tethering a two-carbon bridge between the 2-pyridyl and 3'-pyrrolidino carbons of NIC or 7 affords analogues that bind to the alpha7 receptor in a manner similar to NIC, but with a dramatic loss of affinity for the alpha4beta2 receptor.