The influence of hydrogen bonds on electron transfer rate in photosynthetic RCs

Hydrogen bonds formed between photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) and their cofactors were shown to affect the efficacy of electron transfer. The mechanism of such influence is determined by sensitivity of hydrogen bonds to electron density rearrangements, which alter hydrogen bonds potential energy surface. Quantum chemistry calculations were carried out on a system consisting of a primary quinone Q_A, non-heme Fe²⁺ ion and neighboring residues_. The primary quinone forms two hydrogen bonds with its environment, one of which was shown to be highly sensitive to the Q_A state. In the case of the reduced primary quinone two stable hydrogen bond proton positions were shown to exist on [Q_A-His^M219] hydrogen bond line, while there is only one stable proton position in the case of the oxidized primary quinone. Taking into account this fact and also the ability of proton to transfer between potential energy wells along a hydrogen bond, theoretical study of temperature dependence of hydrogen bond polarization was carried out. Current theory was successfully applied to interpret dark P⁺/Q_A⁻ recombination rate temperature dependence.     

Effect of energy status of hydrogen bond protons on the rate of electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers

We present here a theoretical interpretation of the temperature dependence of the rate of dark recombination which takes place in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers between a primary quinone (Q(A)) and a bacteriochlorophyll dimer. Taking the energy of interaction between hydrogen bond protons and an excessive electron into account, we described qualitative by this nonmonotonous dependence. We considered a molecular model of the primary quinone from Rb. sphaeroides reaction centers. In addition to the primary quinone, the model includes two reaction center fragments that form hydrogen bonds with Q(A). One of these fragments is His(M219), and the other is the peptide [Asn(M259) - Ala(M260)]. We used the two-center approach with regard for electron-phonon interaction in order to calculate the characteristic time of electron tunneling during the recombination reaction. The energy of the phonon emitted/absorbed during the electron tunneling is determined by a relative shift of the donor and the acceptor energy levels, the detuning of levels. The value of level detuning was shown to be temperature dependent in a nonmonotonous manner in the case of hydrogen bonds with double-well potential energy surface. The characteristic time (or the reaction rate) depends on temperature parametrically. The dependence is nonmonotonous and is in qualitative agreement with the experimental one.     

High-resolution two-dimensional 1H and 14N hyperfine sublevel correlation spectroscopy of the primary quinone of photosystem II

Quinones are naturally occurring isoprenoids that are widely exploited by photosynthetic reaction centers. Protein interactions modify the properties of quinones such that similar quinone species can perform diverse functions in reaction centers. Both type I and type II (oxygenic and nonoxygenic, respectively) reaction centers contain quinone cofactors that serve very different functions as the redox potential of similar quinones can operate at up to 800 mV lower reduction potential when present in type I reaction centers. However, the factors that determine quinone function in energy transduction remain unclear. It is thought that the location of the quinone cofactor, the geometry of its binding site, and the "smart" matrix effects from the surrounding protein environment greatly influence the functional properties of quinones. Photosystem II offers a unique system for the investigation of the factors that influence quinone function in energy transduction. It contains identical plastoquinones in the primary and secondary quinone acceptor sites, Q(A) and Q(B), which exhibit very different functional properties. This study is focused on elucidating the tuning and control of the primary semiquinone state, Q(A)(-), of photosystem II. We utilize high-resolution two-dimensional hyperfine sublevel correlation spectroscopy to directly probe the strength and orientation of the hydrogen bonds of the Q(A)(-) state with the surrounding protein environment of photosystem II. We observe two asymmetric hydrogen bonding interactions of reduced Q(A)(-) in which the strength of each hydrogen bond is affected by the relative nonplanarity of the bond. This study confirms the importance of hydrogen bonds in the redox tuning of the primary semiquinone state of photosystem II.     

On the electron stabilization within the quinone acceptor part of Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

The time evolution of the photoinduced differential absorption spectrum of isolated Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers was investigated. The measurements were carried out in the spectral region of 400-500 nm on the time scale of up to 200 microseconds. The spectral changes observed can be interpreted in terms of the effects of proton shift along hydrogen bonds between the primary quinone acceptor and the protein. A theoretical analysis of the spectrum time evolution was performed, which is based on the consideration of the kinetics of proton tunneling along the hydrogen bond. It was shown that the stabilization of the primary quinone electronic state occurs within the first several tens of microseconds after quinone reduction. It slows down upon the deuteration of reaction centers as well as after adding 90% of glycerol; on the other hand, it accelerates as temperature rises up to 40 degrees C.     

Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers

The bacterial reaction center couples light-induced electron transfer to proton pumping across the membrane by reactions of a quinone molecule Q(B) that binds two electrons and two protons at the active site. This article reviews recent experimental work on the mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer and the pathways for proton transfer to the Q(B) site. The mechanism of the first electron transfer, k((1))(AB), Q(-)(A)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(-)(B), was shown to be rate limited by conformational gating. The mechanism of the second electron transfer, k((2))(AB), was shown to involve rapid reversible proton transfer to the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer, H(+)+Q(-)(A)Q(-)(B) ifQ(-)(A)Q(B)H-->Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-). The pathways for transfer of the first and second protons were elucidated by high-resolution X-ray crystallography as well as kinetic studies showing changes in the rate of proton transfer due to site directed mutations and metal ion binding.     

Kinetics and pathways of charge recombination in photosystem II

The mechanism of charge recombination of the S(2)Q(A)(-) state in photosystem II was investigated by modifying the free energy gap between the quinone acceptor Q(A) and the primary pheophytin acceptor Ph. This was done either by changing the midpoint potential of Ph (using mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis with a modified hydrogen bond to this cofactor), or that of Q(A) (using different inhibitors of the Q(B) pocket). The results show that the recombination rate is dependent on the free energy gap between Ph and Q(A), which confirms that the indirect recombination pathway involving formation of Ph(-) has a significant contribution. In the mutant with the largest free energy gap, direct electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to P(+) predominates. The temperature dependence of the recombination rate was investigated, showing a lower activation enthalpy in this mutant compared with the WT. The data allow the determination of the rate of the direct route and of its relative weight in the various strains. The set of currently accepted values for the midpoint potentials of the Q(A)/Q(A)(-), Ph/Ph(-), and P(+)/P* couples is not consistent with the relatively rapid rate of the indirect recombination pathway found here, nor with the 3% yield of delayed fluorescence as previously estimated by de Grooth and van Gorkom (1981, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 635, 445-456). It is argued that a likely explanation is that the midpoint potentials of the two latter couples are more positive than believed due to electrostatic interactions. If such is the case, the estimation of the midpoint potential of the P(+)/P and S(2)/S(1) couples must also be revised upward, with values of 1260 and 1020 mV, respectively.     

Exploring the energy profile of the Q(A)(-) to Q(B) electron transfer reaction in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: pH dependence of the conformational gating step

Both large- and small-scale conformational changes are needed as proteins carry out reactions. However, little is known about the identity, energy of, and barriers between functional substates on protein reaction coordinates. In isolated bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers, the electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone, Q(A)(-), to the secondary quinone, Q(B), is rate limited by conformational changes at low pH and by proton binding at high pH. The kinetics and thermodynamics of this reaction were determined between 200 and 300 K from pH 6 to pH 10.5. A model with two substates of the reactant, P(+)Q(A)(-)Q(B), one protonated (state A) and one unprotonated (alpha), and one state of the product, P(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-) (B), was able to simulate the dependence of the rate on temperature and pH fairly well. The equilibrium between the three states were measured in situ at each temperature. Proton binding (alpha to A transition) has a favorable DeltaH and unfavorable DeltaS as does the conformational changes required for electron transfer at low pH (A to B). The pK for the A to alpha transition is 9.7 at room temperature, consistent with previous measurements, and equivalent to 13.5 at 200 K. The activation barriers were determined for each transition. Both the alpha to A and the A to B transitions are limited primarily by the activation enthalpy with modest DeltaS.     

Exploring the energy landscape for Q(A)(-) to Q(B) electron transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: effect of substrate position and tail length on the conformational gating step

The ability to initiate reactions with a flash of light and to monitor reactions over a wide temperature range allows detailed analysis of reaction mechanisms in photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) of purple bacteria. In this protein, the electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone (Q(A)(-)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) is rate-limited by conformational changes rather than electron tunneling. Q(B) movement from a distal to a proximal site has been proposed to be the rate-limiting change. The importance of quinone motion was examined by shortening the Q(B) tail from 50 to 5 carbons. No change in rate was found from 100 to 300 K. The temperature dependence of the rate was also measured in three L209 proline mutants. Under conditions where Q(B) is in the distal site in wild-type RCs, it is trapped in the proximal site in the Tyr L209 mutant [Kuglstatter, A., et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. The electron transfer slows at low temperature for all three mutants as it does in wild-type protein, indicating that conformational changes still limit the reaction rate. Thus, Q(B) movement is unlikely to be the sole, rate-limiting conformational gating step. The temperature dependence of the reaction in the L209 mutants differs somewhat from wild-type RCs. Entropy-enthalpy compensation reduces the difference in rates and free energy changes at room temperature.     

Protein control of the redox potential of the primary quinone acceptor in reactioncCenters from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The role of the protein environment in determining the redox midpoint potential (E(m)) of Q(A), the primary quinone of bacterial reaction centers, was investigated by mutation of isoleucine at position 265 of the M subunit in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Isoleucine was changed to threonine, serine, and valine, yielding mutants M265IT, M265IS, and M265IV, respectively. All three mutants, with smaller residues replacing isoleucine, exhibited decreased binding affinities of the Q(A) site for various quinone analogues, consistent with an enlargement or loosening of the headgroup binding domain and a decrease in the van der Waals contact for small quinones. In all other respects, M265IV was like the wild type, but the polar mutants, M265IT and M265IS, had unexpectedly dramatic decreases in the redox midpoint potential of Q(A), resulting in faster rates of P(+)Q(A)(-) charge recombination. For both anthraquinone and native ubiquinone, the in situ E(m) of Q(A) was estimated to be approximately 100 and 85 mV lower in M265IT and M265IS, respectively. The effect on E(m)(Q(A)) indicates destabilization of the semiquinone or stabilization of the quinone. This is suggested to arise from either (i) electrostatic interaction between the partial charges or dipole of the residue hydroxyl group and the charge distribution of quinone and semiquinone states with particular influence near the C4 carbonyl group or (ii) from hydrogen bonding interactions between the hydroxyl oxygen and the N(delta)H of histidine M219, causing a weakening of the hydrogen bond to the C4 carbonyl. The rate of the first electron transfer (k(AB)(()(1)())) in the polar mutants was the same as in the wild type at low pH but decelerated at higher pH with altered pH dependence. The rate of the second electron transfer (k(AB)(()(2)())) was 3-4-fold greater than in the wild type over the whole pH range from 4 to 11, consistent with a larger driving force for electron transfer derived from the lower E(m) of Q(A).     

Relationship between the oxidation potential of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer and electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers

The primary electron donor in the photosynthetic reaction center from purple bacteria is a bacteriochlorophyll dimer containing four conjugated carbonyl groups that may form hydrogen bonds with amino acid residues. Spectroscopic analyses of a set of mutant reaction centers confirm that hydrogen bonds can be formed between each of these carbonyl groups and histidine residues in the reaction center subunits. The addition of each hydrogen bond is correlated with an increase in the oxidation potential of the dimer, resulting in a 355-mV range in the midpoint potential. The resulting changes in the free-energy differences for several reactions involving the dimer are related to the electron transfer rates using the Marcus theory. These reactions include electron transfer from cytochrome c₂ to the oxidized dimer, charge recombination from the primary electron acceptor quinone, and the initial forward electron transfer.     

Initial stage of coupling electron and proton transport in the vicinity of the secondary quinone in photosynthesis of bacteria and plants

The coupling of electron and proton transport in the vicinity of the secondary quinone QB in the reaction center of bacteria and photosystem II of higher plants was investigated. The energy levels and wave functions of the proton in the system QB--histidine L 190 were calculated. It was shown that the proton of histidine forms a hydrogen bond with the doubly reduced quinone QB2-. A new scheme of proton transport through histidine L 190 and its coupling with electron transport was proposed.     

Mimicking the photosynthetic system with strong hydrogen bonds to promote proton electron concerted reactions

A Copper(2+) complex with a Cu^II–C bond containing sp³ configuration was used to investigate the role of strong hydrogen bonds in proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. The only example of a Cu^II–C system realized so far is that using tris-(pyridylthio)methyl (tptm) as a tetradentate tripodal ligand. Using this ligand, [CuF(tptm)] and [Cu(tptm)(OH)] have been prepared. The former complex forms supra-molecular arrays of layers of the complex between which hydroquinone is intercalated in the crystalline phase. This hydroquinone intercalation crystal was prepared via the photochemical conversion of quinone during the crystallization process. This conversion reaction probably involves a proton coupled electron transfer process. The nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis of the reaction mixture shows the presence of Cu(III) during the conversion reaction. These results strongly suggest the presence of the molecular aggregate of the [CuF(tptm)] complex, water and quinone in the solution phase during the quinone to hydroquinone conversion. The presence of this type of aggregate requires a strong hydrogen bond between the [CuF(tptm)] complex and water. The presence of this particular hydrogen bond is a unique character of such a complex that has the Cu^II–C bond. This complex is used as a model for photosynthetic water splitting since the photoconversion of quinone to hydroquinone also involves the production of oxygen from water.     

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 facilitates proton transfer to the secondary quinone (QB)

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy to reduce and protonate a quinone molecule, Q(B) (the secondary quinone electron acceptor), to form quinol, Q(B)H2. Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 have been proposed to be components of the pathway for proton transfer [Axelrod, H. L., Abresch, E. C., Paddock, M. L., Okamura, M. Y., and Feher, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1542-1547]. To test the importance of these residues for efficient proton transfer, the rates of the proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction k(AB)(2) (Q(A-*)Q(B-*) + H+ <==>Q(A-*)Q(B)H* --> Q(A)Q(B)H-) and its associated proton uptake were measured in native and mutant RCs, lacking one or both Asp residues. In the double mutant RCs, the k(AB)(2) reaction and its associated proton uptake were approximately 300-fold slower than in native RCs (pH 8). In contrast, single mutant RCs displayed reaction rates that were < or =3-fold slower than native (pH 8). In addition, the rate-limiting step of k(AB)(2) was changed from electron transfer (native and single mutants) to proton transfer (double mutant) as shown from the lack of a dependence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer in the double mutant RCs compared to the native or single mutants. This implies that the rate of the proton-transfer step was reduced (> or =10(3)-fold) upon replacement of both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn. Similar, but less drastic, differences were observed for k(AB)(1), which at pH > or =8 is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212 [(Q(A-*)Q(B))-Glu- + H+ --> (Q(A)Q(B-*)-GluH]. These results show that the pathway for proton transfer from solution to reduced Q(B) involves both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17, which provide parallel branches to the proton-transfer pathway and through their electrostatic interaction have a cooperative effect on the proton-transfer rate. A possible mechanism for the cooperativity is discussed.     

Electrogenic Protonation of the Secondary Quinone Acceptor Q<Subscript>B</Subscript> in Spinach Photosystem II Complexes Incorporated into Lipid Vesicles

The generation of transmembrane electric potential difference (delta psi) in quinone acceptor complex of proteoliposomes containing core complexes of photosystem II from spinach was studied using for the measurements a direct electrometric technique. Besides the fast increase in the membrane potential associated with the electron transfer between the redox-active tyrosine 161 residue (Y(Z)) in D1 polypeptide and the primary quinone acceptor Q(A), an additional electrogenic phase with tau approximately 0.85 msec at pH 7.3 and the maximal relative amplitude of approximately 11% of the Y(Z)ox Q(A)- phase was observed after the second light flash. The sensitivity of this phase to diuron (an inhibitor of electron transfer between Q(A) and the secondary quinone acceptor Q(B)), the dependence of its amplitude on the light flash parity, and also a decrease in its rate constant with increase in pH indicated that it was due to dismutation of Q(A)- and Q(B)- with the subsequent protonation of a doubly reduced plastoquinone molecule: Q(A)- Q(B)- + 2H+ --> Q(A)Q(B)H2.     

Protein-cofactor interactions in bacterial reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: II. Geometry of the hydrogen bonds to the primary quinone formula by 1H and 2H ENDOR spectroscopy

The geometry of the hydrogen bonds to the two carbonyl oxygens of the semiquinone Q(A)(. -) in the reaction center (RC) from the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 were determined by fitting a spin Hamiltonian to the data derived from (1)H and (2)H ENDOR spectroscopies at 35 GHz and 80 K. The experiments were performed on RCs in which the native Fe(2+) (high spin) was replaced by diamagnetic Zn(2+) to prevent spectral line broadening of the Q(A)(. -) due to magnetic coupling with the iron. The principal components of the hyperfine coupling and nuclear quadrupolar coupling tensors of the hydrogen-bonded protons (deuterons) and their principal directions with respect to the quinone axes were obtained by spectral simulations of ENDOR spectra at different magnetic fields on frozen solutions of deuterated Q(A)(. -) in H(2)O buffer and protonated Q(A)(. -) in D(2)O buffer. Hydrogen-bond lengths were obtained from the nuclear quadrupolar couplings. The two hydrogen bonds were found to be nonequivalent, having different directions and different bond lengths. The H-bond lengths r(OH) are 1.73 +/- 0.03 Angstrom and 1.60 +/- 0.04 Angstrom, from the carbonyl oxygens O(1) and O(4) to the NH group of Ala M260 and the imidazole nitrogen N(delta) of His M219, respectively. The asymmetric hydrogen bonds of Q(A)(. -) affect the spin density distribution in the quinone radical and its electronic structure. It is proposed that the H-bonds play an important role in defining the physical properties of the primary quinone, which affect the electron transfer processes in the RC.     

Cumulant analysis of charge recombination kinetics in bacterial reaction centers reconstituted into lipid vesicles

The kinetics of charge recombination between the primary photoxidized donor (P(+)) and the secondary reduced quinone acceptor (Q(B)(-)) have been studied in reaction centers (RCs) from the purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides incorporated into lecithin vesicles containing large ubiquinone pools over the temperature range 275 K = (50 +/- 15) nm). Following these premises, we describe the kinetics of P(+)Q(B)(-) recombination with a truncated cumulant expansion and relate it to P(Q) and to the free energy changes for Q(A)(-)Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron transfer (DeltaG(AB)(o)) and for quinone binding (DeltaG(bind)(o)) at Q(B). The model accounts well for the temperature and quinone dependence of the charge recombination kinetics, yielding DeltaG(AB)(o) = -7.67 +/- 0.05 kJ mol(-1) and DeltaG(bind)(o) = -14.6 +/- 0.6 kJ mol(-1) at 298 K.     

An isotope-edited FTIR investigation of the role of Ser-L223 in binding quinone (QB) and semiquinone (QB-) in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions occur at the secondary quinone (Q(B)) site. Several nearby residues are important for both binding and redox chemistry involved in the light-induced conversion from Q(B) to quinol Q(B)H(2). Ser-L223 is one of the functionally important residues located near Q(B). To obtain information on the interaction between Ser-L223 and Q(B) and Q(B)(-), isotope-edited Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR difference spectra were measured in a mutant RC in which Ser-L223 is replaced with Ala and compared to the native RC. The isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra for the C=O [see text] and C=C [see text] modes of Q(B) (Q(B)(-)) in the mutant are essentially the same as those of the native RC. These findings indicate that highly equivalent interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein occur in both native and mutant RCs. The simplest explanation of these results is that Ser-L223 is not hydrogen bonded to Q(B) or Q(B)(-) but presumably forms a hydrogen bond to a nearby acid group, preferentially Asp-L213. The rotation of the Ser OH proton from Asp-L213 to Q(B)(-) is expected to be an important step in the proton transfer to the reduced quinone. In addition, the reduced quinone remains firmly bound, indicating that other distinct hydrogen bonds are more important for stabilizing Q(B)(-). Implications on the design features of the Q(B) binding site are discussed.     

The function of photosystem I. Quantum chemical insight into the role of tryptophan-quinone interactions

Quantum chemical calculations have provided evidence for the role of tryptophan residues in the electron transfer process of photosystem I (PS-I). The interaction of Trp with quinone acceptors and their radical anions in the A(1) site of PS-I has been modeled by various indole-quinone and indole-semiquinone complexes. MP2 optimizations show that, while neutral quinones and an indole molecule prefer a pi-stacked arrangement, semiquinone radical anions prefer a T-stacked conformation with significant N-H...pi hydrogen bonding interactions. Comparison of density functional calculations of electronic g-tensors with electron paramagnetic resonance data strongly suggests that hydrogen-bonded T-shaped arrangements occur upon reduction of quinone acceptors without an extended side chain (e.g., duroquinone or naphthoquinone), when reconstituted into the phylloquinone-depleted A(1) site of PS-I. In contrast, for the native phylloquinone (vitamin K(1), Q(K)), reorientation of the semiquinone radical anion is prevented by side chain-protein interactions. For a fixed pi-stacked arrangement, the extent of the intermolecular interaction is reduced upon one-electron reduction. This corresponds to a lowering of the redox potential of the P(700)(+)*Q(K)(-)* radical pair, due to interactions of Q(K) with a tryptophan. Together with the comparably weak hydrogen bonding in PS-I, the proposed model explains the very negative redox potential of the A(1) site, needed for forward electron transfer. T-stacking hydrogen bonds to semiquinones may also have to be considered in many other electron transfer processes in living organisms.     

Quinone (QB) reduction by B-branch electron transfer in mutant bacterial reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: quantum efficiency and X-ray structure

The photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from purple bacteria converts light into chemical energy. Although the RC shows two nearly structurally symmetric branches, A and B, light-induced electron transfer in the native RC occurs almost exclusively along the A-branch to a primary quinone electron acceptor Q(A). Subsequent electron and proton transfer to a mobile quinone molecule Q(B) converts it to a quinol, Q(B)H(2). We report the construction and characterization of a series of mutants in Rhodobacter sphaeroides designed to reduce Q(B) via the B-branch. The quantum efficiency to Q(B) via the B-branch Phi(B) ranged from 0.4% in an RC containing the single mutation Ala-M260 --> Trp to 5% in a quintuple mutant which includes in addition three mutations to inhibit transfer along the A-branch (Gly-M203 --> Asp, Tyr-M210 --> Phe, Leu-M214 --> His) and one to promote transfer along the B-branch (Phe-L181 --> Tyr). Comparing the value of 0.4% for Phi(B) obtained in the AW(M260) mutant, which lacks Q(A), to the 100% quantum efficiency for Phi(A) along the A-branch in the native RC, we obtain a ratio for A-branch to B-branch electron transfer of 250:1. We determined the structure of the most effective (quintuple) mutant RC at 2.25 A (R-factor = 19.6%). The Q(A) site did not contain a quinone but was occupied by the side chain of Trp-M260 and a Cl(-). In this structure a nonfunctional quinone was found to occupy a new site near M258 and M268. The implications of this work to trap intermediate states are discussed.     

Protonmotive pathways and mechanisms in the cytochrome bc1 complex

The cytochrome bc(1) complex catalyzes electron transfer from ubiquinol to cytochrome c by a protonmotive Q cycle mechanism in which electron transfer is linked to proton translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane. In the Q cycle mechanism proton translocation is the net result of topographically segregated reduction of quinone and reoxidation of quinol on opposite sides of the membrane, with protons being carried across the membrane as hydrogens on the quinol. The linkage of proton chemistry to electron transfer during quinol oxidation and quinone reduction requires pathways for moving protons to and from the aqueous phase and the hydrophobic environment in which the quinol and quinone redox reactions occur. Crystal structures of the mitochondrial cytochrome bc(1) complexes in various conformations allow insight into possible proton conduction pathways. In this review we discuss pathways for proton conduction linked to ubiquinone redox reactions with particular reference to recently determined structures of the yeast bc(1) complex.