Relative Efficiency of Estimators of the Mean of a Normal Distribution when Coefficient of Variation is Known

A biased but simple and consistent estimator of the parameter ? has been obtained for the normal distribution N(?, a?₂), ?>0 where a is a known constant. It is shown that the estimator is more efficient than the sample mean or any suitably chosen constant multiple of the sample standard deviation. It is also proved to be more efficient than the mimumum variance unbiased estimator among a typical class of unbiased estimators derived by RASUL KHAN (1968).     

On a Class of Almost Unbiased Ratio Estimators

A class of almost unbiased ratio estimators for population mean σ is derived by weighting sample σ = (1/n) σ y_i, ratio estimators σ and an estimator, σ (y_i/x_i). It is shown that NIETO DE PASCUAL (1961) estimator is a particular member of the class and an optimum estimator in the class (in the minimum variance sense) is identified. The results are illustrated through two numerical examples.     

Some Early Developments in Ratio Estimation

John Graunt (1662) was the first to estimate the ratio y/x where y represents the total population and x the known total number of registered births in the same areas during the preceding year. About 1765 Messance (Stephan, 1948) and Moheau (1778) published very carefully prepared estimates for France based on enumeration of population in certain districts and on the count of births, deaths and marriages as reported for the whole country. The districts from which the ratio of inhabitants to birth was determined only constituted a sample. Laplace (1786) prepared similar estimates in 1802 based on a two-stage sampling plan. Recently Hansen and Hurwitz (1943) showed that the ratio estimate (y_i/n_i)X of Y is unbiased where all x_i's are known and the n^th cluster is selected with p.p.s. More recently Hájek (1949), Lahiri (1951), Midzuno (1952) and Sen (1952) developed independently the sampling of n clusters with p.p.s to the totals of the sizes of the sample clusters S(x_i). Des Raj (1954) and Sen (1952, 1953) gave unbiased estimate of the variance of the estimator which was generally non-negative for samples with smaller probabilities. Rao and Vijayan (1977) gave an unbiased estimator which is non-negative for samples with larger probabilities. Hájek (1949) provided an almost unbiased estimator of the variance of the estimator. The paper discusses situations where Hájek's estimator of variance should be preferred to the Rao-Vijayan estimator and vice versa.     

Estimation of Finite Population Variance Using Ratio and Product Methods of Estimation

For estimating finite population variance σ_y² of a character y under our study, estimators using auxiliary information on a character x in the form of ratio, product, ratio-type or product-type estimators have been suggested, and their comparative study with the conventional unbiased estimator s_y² of σ_y² has been made in simple random sampling with replacement. A generalized estimator representing a class of estimators for the finite populations variance, has also been studied.     

Improvement Over Transformed Auxiliary Variable in Estimating the Finite Population Mean

For estimating the finite population mean of the study variable y, we propose a ratio‐type estimator which gives an improvement over estimators given by Upadhyaya and Singh (1999), Sisodia and Dwivedi (1981), and Singh and Kakran (1993). These estimators are compared by observing the bias and mean square error (MSE). In this empirical study, the suggested estimator under the optimal condition is found to be more efficient than the estimators mentioned above.     

Corrected estimator of sensitive population proportion using unknown repeated trials in the unrelated question randomized response model

In this paper, we have pointed out a major mistake in the research paper of Singh and Mathur [(2004). Unknown repeated trials in the unrelated question randomized response model, Biometrical Journal, 46:375–378]. We have corrected this mistake and proposed the corresponding corrected estimator of sensitive population proportion. Furthermore, we have obtained the variance of our proposed estimator. Likewise, Singh and Mathur, we have also compared the variance of our proposed estimator with that of the Greenberg et al.’s estimator theoretically as well as numerically.     

Edge-corrected Estimators for the Reduced Second Moment Measure of Point Processes

A new edge-corrected estimator is proposed for the second moment cumulative function K(t) introduced by Ripley (1977, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39, 172–212). This new estimator is compared by simulation methods with existing edge-corrected estimators in the context of both K(t) and L(t) functions which are used to study point patterns. The results of the simulation study suggests that the new estimator provides almost unbiased estimates of K(t) and L(t) and has a smaller mean squared error than its predecessors.     

On Combination of Ratio and PPS Estimators

AGARWAL and KUMAR (1980) proposed an estimator, combining ratio and pps estimators of population mean and proved that the proposed estimator would always be better (in minimum mean square error sense) than the pps estimator or the ratio estimator under pps sampling scheme for optimum value of constant k (parameter). The optimum value of k is rarely known in practice, hence the alternative is to replace k from the sample-values. In this paper, an estimator depending on estimated optimum value of k based on sample-values, under pps sampling scheme is proposed and studied.     

Determination of Number and Size of Spherical Particles from Extraction Replicas

For spherical particles randomly dispersed in the space of a specimen the estimators of the parameters of the space structure from the measurements obtained from extraction replicas are given. First an arbitrary form of the probability density function f(x) of the diameter X and then the generalized RAYLEIGH and lognormal distributions of X are considered. Unbiased estimators of the space parameters and of parameters of these distributions are found. The variances of these estimators are given and unbiased estimators of these variances are determined.     

No BLUE among phylogenetic estimators

 Multivariate analysis is a branch of statistics that successfully exploits the powerful tools of linear algebra to obtain a fairly comprehensive theory of estimation. The purpose of this paper is to explore to what extent a linear theory of estimation can be developed in the context of coalescent models used in the analysis of DNA polymorphism. We consider a large class of coalescent models, of which the neutral infinite sites model is one example. In the process, we discover several limitations of linear estimators that are quite distinct from those in the classical theory. In particular, we prove that there does not exist a uniformly BLUE (best linear unbiased estimator) for the scaled mutation parameter, under the assumptions of the neutral model of evolution. In fact, we show that no linear estimator performs uniformly better than the Watterson (1975) method based on the total number of segregating sites. For certain coalescent models, the segregating-sites estimator is actually optimal. The general conclusion is the following. If genealogical information is useful for estimating the rate of evolution, then there is no optimal linear method. If there is an optimal linear method, then no information other than the total number of segregating sites is needed. Received: 29 July 1998 / Revised version: 9 October 1998     

On Edge-Corrected Probability Density Function Estimators for Point Processes

FIKSEL (1988) provides an asymptotically unbiased kernel estimator for the density h_s (r) of the spherical contact distribution function of stationary and isotropic point processes. This paper proposes alternative estimators of h_s (r) for use with regular grid of locations. The existing estimator of h_s (r) and the alternatives proposed in this paper are then tested out in a simulation study.     

Estimators Asymptotically Minimax in Wide Sense

Estimators of location are considered. Huber (1964) introduced estimators asymptotically minimax on the set ?? of all regular M-estimators, for a given contamination ε and for the set Q of all regular symmetric alternative data sources. We extend his concept by admitting arbitrary sets ?? of regular M-estimators and arbitrary sets Q or regular symmetric alternative sources, and also by replacing the singletons [ε] ? (0, 1) by arbitrary subsets ?? ? (0, 1). The resulting estimator cannot in general be evaluated explicitly. But for finite T it exists and, if ?? and Q are finite too, it may be chosen by a computer. This extra burden is justified in some cases since more than 100% relative efficiency gain against all Huber's Hk is achievable in this manner. Such gains are achieved for a nontrivial family Q by the estimator proposed in Vajda (1984), with redescending influence curve, which is shown to be asymptotically minimax in wide sense.     

Use of Transformed Auxiliary Variable in Estimating the Finite Population Mean

For estimating the finite population mean Y- of the study character y, an estimator using a transformed auxiliary variable has been defined. The bias and mean-squared error (MSE) of the proposed estimator have been obtained. The regions of preference have been obtained under which it is better than usual unbiased estimator y-, the ratio estimator y-_R = y-X-/x-, Sisodia and Dwivedi (1981) estimator y-_s = y-(X- + C_x)/(x- + C_x) and Singh and Kakran (1993) estimator y-_k = y[X- + β₂(x)]/[x- + β₂(x)]. An empirical study has been carried out to demonstrate the superiority of the suggested estimator over the others.     

Interval Estimation of Simple Difference under Independent Negative Binomial Sampling

When the sample size is not large or when the underlying disease is rare, to assure collection of an appropriate number of cases and to control the relative error of estimation, one may employ inverse sampling, in which one continues sampling subjects until one obtains exactly the desired number of cases. This paper focuses discussion on interval estimation of the simple difference between two proportions under independent inverse sampling. This paper develops three asymptotic interval estimators on the basis of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE), and the asymptotic likelihood ratio test (ALRT). To compare the performance of these three estimators, this paper calculates the coverage probability and the expected length of the resulting confidence intervals on the basis of the exact distribution. This paper finds that when the underlying proportions of cases in both two comparison populations are small or moderate (≤0.20), all three asymptotic interval estimators developed here perform reasonably well even for the pre-determined number of cases as small as 5. When the pre-determined number of cases is moderate or large (≥50), all three estimators are essentially equivalent in all the situations considered here. Because application of the two interval estimators derived from the MLE and the UMVUE does not involve any numerical iterative procedure needed in the ALRT, for simplicity we may use these two estimators without losing efficiency.     

A Comparison of Nonparametric Error Rate Estimation Methods in Classification Problems

Assessment of the misclassification error rate is of high practical relevance in many biomedical applications. As it is a complex problem, theoretical results on estimator performance are few. The origin of most findings are Monte Carlo simulations, which take place in the “normal setting”: The covariables of two groups have a multivariate normal distribution; The groups differ in location, but have the same covariance matrix and the linear discriminant function LDF is used for prediction. We perform a new simulation to compare existing nonparametric estimators in a more complex situation. The underlying distribution is based on a logistic model with six binary as well as continuous covariables. To study estimator performance for varying true error rates, three prediction rules including nonparametric classification trees and parametric logistic regression and sample sizes ranging from 100‐1,000 are considered. In contrast to most published papers we turn our attention to estimator performance based on simple, even inappropriate prediction rules and relatively large training sets. For the major part, results are in agreement with usual findings. The most strikingly behavior was seen in applying (simple) classification trees for prediction: Since the apparent error rate Êrr.app is biased, linear combinations incorporating Êrr.app underestimate the true error rate even for large sample sizes. The .632+ estimator, which was designed to correct for the overoptimism of Efron's .632 estimator for nonparametric prediction rules, performs best of all such linear combinations. The bootstrap estimator Êrr.B0 and the crossvalidation estimator Êrr.cv, which do not depend on Êrr.app, seem to track the true error rate. Although the disadvantages of both estimators – pessimism of Êrr.B0 and high variability of Êrr.cv – shrink with increased sample sizes, they are still visible. We conclude that for the choice of a particular estimator the asymptotic behavior of the apparent error rate is important. For the assessment of estimator performance the variance of the true error rate is crucial, where in general the stability of prediction procedures is essential for the application of estimators based on resampling methods. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

On an Unbiased Variance Estimator for the WILCOXON-MANN-WHITNEY-Statistic Based on Ranks

For some applications of the WILCOXON-MANN-WHITNEY-statistic its variance has to be estimated. So e.g. for the test of POTTHOFF (1963) to detect differences in medians of two symmetric distributions as well as for the computation of approximate, confidence bounds for the probability P(X₁ ≥ X₂), cf. GOVINDARAJULU (1968). In the present paper an easy to compute variance estimator is proposed which as only information uses the ranks of the data with the additional property that it is unbiased for the finite variance. Because of its invariance under any monotone transformation of the data its applicability is not confined to quantitative data. The estimator may be applied to ordinal data just as well. Some properties are discussed and a numerical example is given.     

New Ranked Set Sampling for One‐Parameter Family of Distributions

Bhoj (1997c) proposed a new ranked set sampling (NRSS) procedure for a specific two‐parameter family of distributions when the sample size is even. This NRSS procedure can be applied to one‐parameter family of distributions when the sample size is even. However, this procedure cannot be used if the sample size is odd. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a modified version of the NRSS procedure which can be used for one‐parameter distributions when the sample size is odd. Simple estimator for the parameter based on proposed NRSS is derived. The relative precisions of this estimator are higher than those of other estimators which are based on other ranked set sampling procedures and the best linear unbiased estimator using all order statistics.     

Notes in Case-Control Studies with Matched Pairs under Inverse Sampling

In case-control studies with matched pairs, the traditional point estimator of odds ratio (OR) is well-known to be biased with no exact finite variance under binomial sampling. In this paper, we consider use of inverse sampling in which we continue to sample subjects to form matched pairs until we obtain a pre-determined number (>0) of index pairs with the case unexposed but the control exposed. In contrast to use of binomial sampling, we show that the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of OR does exist under inverse sampling. We further derive an exact confidence interval of OR in closed form. Finally, we develop an exact test and an asymptotic test for testing the null hypothesis H₀: OR = 1, as well as discuss sample size determination on the minimum required number of index pairs for a desired power at α-level.     

On a restricted occupancy model and its applications

With the multivariate hypergeometric distribution as a background certain occupancy distributions useful in practical applications are derived. More specifically it is assumed that a sample of n individuals is drawn from a population consisting of m types with r individuals in each type, (i) without replacement and (ii) by returning the selected individual in the population and with it another individual of the same type. The distributions of the number Z of distinct types observed in the sample are obtained in both cases in terms of the numbers. Assuming, in addition to the m equiprobable types of individuals, the existence of a control type, say, with s individuals, the joint distribution of the number U of distinct types observed in the sample and the number V of individuals of the control type present in the sample is obtained in terms of the numbers C(n, k, r) and the marginal distribution of U in terms of the Gould-Hopper numbers. Using these distributions minimum variance unbiased estimators of the number m of types are derived. Moreover small sample tests based on the zero frequency are constructed.     

On the equivalence of meta-analysis using literature and using individual patient data

When data come from several independent studies for the purpose of estimating treatment control differences, meta-analysis can be carried out either on the best linear unbiased estimators computed from each study or on the pooled individual patient data modelled as a two-way model without interaction, where the two factors represent the different studies and the different treatments. Assuming that observations within and between studies are independent having a common variance, Olkin and Sampson (1998) have obtained the surprising result that the two meta-analytic procedures are equivalent, i.e., they both produce the same estimator. In this article, the same equivalence is established for the two-way fixed-effects model without interaction with the only assumption that the observations across studies be independent. A consequence of the equivalence result is that, regardless of the covariance structure, it is possible to get an explicit representation for the best linear unbiased estimator of any vector of treatment contrasts in a two-way fixed-effects model without interaction as long as the studies are independent. Another interesting consequence is that, for the purpose of best linear unbiased estimation, an unbalanced two-way fixed-effects model without interaction can be treated as several independent unbalanced one-way models, regardless of the covariance structure, when the studies are independent.