Differential tyrosine phosphorylation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor-1 and receptor proximal signal transduction in response to FGF-2 and heparin

The sulfated regions in heparan sulfate and heparin are known to affect fibroblast growth factor (FGF) function. We have studied the mechanism whereby heparin directs FGF-2-induced FGF receptor-1 (FGFR-1) signal transduction. FGF-2 alone stimulated maximal phosphorylation of Src homology domain 2 tyrosine phosphatase (SHP-2) and the adaptor molecule Crk, in heparan sulfate-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) 677 cells expressing FGFR-1. In contrast, for phospholipase Cgamma(1) (PLCgamma(1)) and the adaptor molecule Shb to be maximally tyrosine-phosphorylated, cells had to be stimulated with both FGF-2 and heparin (100 ng/ml). Tyrosine residues 463 in the juxtamembrane domain and 766 in the C-terminal tail in FGFR-1 are known to bind Crk and PLCgamma(1), respectively. Analysis of tryptic phosphopeptide maps of FGFR-1 from cells stimulated with FGF-2 alone and FGF-2 together with heparin showed that FGF-2 alone stimulated a several-fold increase in tyrosine 463 in the juxtamembrane domain. In contrast, heparin had to be included in order for tyrosine 766 to be phosphorylated to the same fold level. Our data imply that tyrosine 463 is phosphorylated and able to transduce signals in response to FGF-2 treatment alone; furthermore, we suggest that FGFR-1 dimerization/kinase activation is stabilized by heparin.     

Alternatively spliced FGFR-1 isoforms differentially modulate endothelial cell activation of c-YES

Ligand activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (FGFR-1) induces an angiogenic response following activation of multiple intracellular signaling substrates, including the Src family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (SFK). However, the direct association between FGFR-1 and SFK and the involvement of SFK in FGFR-1-dependent cell proliferation have been controversial. Structural variants of FGFR-1 are generated by alternative splicing which results in two major isoforms, containing either three (FGFR-1α) or two (FGFR-1β) immunoglobulin-like domains in the extracellular region. To determine whether alternatively spliced FGFR-1 isoforms differentially activate SFK, we have examined FGF receptor-negative endothelial cells stably transfected with human cDNA encoding either FGFR-1α or FGFR-1β. Transient activation of c-YES, the predominant SFK expressed in these endothelial cells, was restricted to FGFR-1β transfectants following exposure to acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-1). Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that c-YES directly associated with FGFR-1β. The Src homology (SH)2 domain (and not the SH3 domain) of c-YES was able to recognize tyrosine phosphorylated FGFR-1β. FGFR-1β-specific activation of c-YES was accompanied by its association with and activation of cortactin. FGF-1 treatment of both FGFR-1α and FGFR-1β transfectants induced SFK-independent cellular proliferation and growth in low density cultures. At high density, under both anchorage-dependent and -independent conditions, FGF-1 failed to induce proliferation and growth of FGFR-1α transfectants. In contrast, FGF-1 induced proliferation, growth, and formation of cord-like structures in high density cultures of FGFR-1β transfectants in an SFK-dependent manner. In vitro cord formation on Matrigel was restricted to FGFR-1β transfectants in an SFK-dependent manner. Formation of vascular structures in vivo was limited to endothelial cells transfected with FGFR-1β. Collectively, these results emphasize the roles of alternatively spliced FGFR-1 structural isoforms and activation of SFK as modulators of endothelial cell growth during the formation of neovascular structures.     

Nuclear Translocation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors in response to FGF-2

Members of the FGF family of growth factors localize to the nuclei in a variety of different cell types. To determine whether FGF receptors are also present within nuclei and if this localization is regulated by FGFs, nuclei were prepared from quiescent and FGF-2-treated Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts and examined for the presence of FGF receptors by immunoblotting with an antibody produced against the extracellular domain of FGF receptor-1 (FGFR-1). Little or no FGFR-1 is detected in nuclei prepared from quiescent cells. When cells are treated with FGF- 2, however, there is a time- and dose-dependent increase in the association of FGFR-1 immunoreactivity with the nucleus. In contrast, treatment with either EGF or 10% serum does not increase the association of FGFR-1 with the nucleus. When cell surface proteins are labeled with biotin, a biotinylated FGFR-1 is detected in the nuclear fraction prepared from FGF-2-treated, but not untreated, cells indicating that the nuclear-associated FGFR-1 immunoreactivity derives from the cell surface. The presence of FGFR-1 in the nuclei of FGF-2- treated cells was confirmed by immunostaining with a panel of different FGFR-1 antibodies, including one directed against the COOH-terminal domain of the protein. Fractionation of nuclei from FGF-2-treated cells indicates that nuclear FGFR-1 is localized to the nuclear matrix, suggesting that the receptor may play a role in regulating gene activity.     

Fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 shows novel features in genomic structure, ligand binding and signal transduction.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR) gene family consists of at least four receptor tyrosine kinases that transduce signals important in a variety of developmental and physiological processes related to cell growth and differentiation. Here we have characterized the binding of different FGFs to FGFR-4. Our results establish an FGF binding profile for FGFR-4 with aFGF having the highest affinity, followed by K-FGF/hst-1 and bFGF. In addition, FGF-6 was found to bind to FGFR-4 in ligand competition experiments. Interestingly, the FGFR-4 gene was found to encode only the prototype receptor in a region where both FGFR-1 and FGFR-2 show alternative splicing leading to differences in their ligand binding specificities and to secreted forms of these receptors. Ligands binding to FGFR-4 induced receptor autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of a set of cellular polypeptides, which differed from those phosphorylated in FGFR-1-expressing cells. Specifically, the FGFR-1-expressing cells showed a considerably more extensive tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma than the FGFR-4-expressing cells. Structural and functional specificity within the FGFR family exemplified by FGFR-4 may help to explain how FGFs perform their diverse functions.     

Cell transformation by fibroblast growth factors can be suppressed by truncated fibroblast growth factor receptors.

Ligand-induced dimerization and transphosphorylation are thought to be important events by which receptor tyrosine kinases generate cellular signals. We have investigated the ability of signalling-defective, truncated fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors (FGFR-1 and FGFR-2) to block the FGF response in cells that express both types of endogenous FGF receptors. When these dominant negative receptors are expressed in NIH 3T3 cells transformed by the secreted FGF-4, the transformed properties of the cells can be reverted to various degrees, with better reversion phenotype correlating with higher levels of truncated receptor expression. Furthermore, truncated FGFR-2 is significantly more efficient at producing reversion than FGFR-1, indicating that FGF-4 preferentially utilizes the FGFR-2 signalling pathway. NIH 3T3 clones expressing these truncated receptors are more resistant to FGF-induced mitogenesis and also exhibit reduced tyrosine phosphorylation upon treatment with FGF. The block in FGF-signalling, however, can be overcome by the addition of excess growth factor. The truncated receptors have binding affinities that are four- to eightfold lower than those of wild-type receptors, as measured by Scatchard analysis. We also observed a partial specificity in the responses of truncated-receptor-expressing clones to FGF-2 or FGF-4. Our results suggest that the block to signal transduction produced by kinase-negative FGF receptors is achieved through a combination of dominant negative effects and competition for growth factor binding with functional receptors.     

Characterization of FGF receptor expression in human neutrophils and their contribution to chemotaxis

Several members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family are potent endothelial cell (EC) mitogens and angiogenic factors, and their activities can be mediated by four tyrosine kinase receptors (FGFR1-4). In addition, FGFs can induce the release of inflammatory mediators by ECs and the expression of adhesion molecules at their surface, thereby favoring the recruitment and transvascular migration of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils. Neither the expression nor the biological activities that could be mediated by FGFRs have been investigated in human neutrophils. By biochemical and cytological analyses, we observed that purified circulating human neutrophils from healthy individuals expressed varying levels of FGFRs in their cytosol and at their cytoplasmic membrane. FGFR-2 was identified as the sole cell surface receptor, with FGFR-1 and -4 localizing in the cytosol and FGFR-3 being undetectable. We assessed the capacity of FGF-1 and FGF-2 to induce neutrophil chemotaxis in a modified Boyden microchamber and observed that they increase neutrophil transmigration at 10(-10) and 10(-9) M and by 1.77- and 2.34-fold, respectively, as compared with PBS-treated cells. Treatment with a selective anti-FGFR-2 antibody reduced FGF-1-mediated chemotaxis by 75% and abrogated the effect of FGF-2, while the blockade of FGFR-1 and -4 partially inhibited (15-40%) FGF-chemotactic activities. In summary, our data are the first to report the expression of FGF receptors in human neutrophils, with FGF-1 and FGF-2 promoting neutrophil chemotaxis mainly through FGFR-2 activation.     

Identification of the Cytoplasmic Regions of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Receptor 1 Which Play Important Roles in Induction of Neurite Outgrowth in PC12 Cells by FGF-1

Fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF-1) induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Recently, we have shown that the FGF receptor 1 (FGFR-1) is much more potent than FGFR-3 in induction of neurite outgrowth. To identify the cytoplasmic regions of FGFR-1 that are responsible for the induction of neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells, we took advantage of this difference and prepared receptor chimeras containing different regions of the FGFR-1 introduced into the FGFR-3 protein. The chimeric receptors were introduced into FGF-nonresponsive variant PC12 cells (fnr-PC12 cells), and their ability to mediate FGF-stimulated neurite outgrowth of the cells was assessed. The juxtamembrane (JM) and carboxy-terminal (COOH) regions of FGFR-1 were identified as conferring robust and moderate abilities, respectively, for induction of neurite outgrowth to FGFR-3. Analysis of FGF-stimulated activation of signal transduction revealed that the JM region of FGFR-1 conferred strong and sustained tyrosine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins and activation of MAP kinase. The SNT/FRS2 protein was demonstrated to be one of the cellular substrates preferentially phosphorylated by chimeras containing the JM domain of FGFR-1. SNT/FRS2 links FGF signaling to the MAP kinase pathway. Thus, the ability of FGFR-1 JM domain chimeras to induce strong sustained phosphorylation of this protein would explain the ability of these chimeras to activate MAP kinase and hence neurite outgrowth. The role of the COOH region of FGFR-1 in induction of neurite outgrowth involved the tyrosine residue at amino acid position 764, a site required for phospholipase C gamma binding and activation, whereas the JM region functioned primarily through a non-phosphotyrosine-dependent mechanism. In contrast, assessment of the chimeras in the pre-B lymphoid cell line BaF3 for FGF-1-induced mitogenesis revealed that the JM region did not play a role in this cell type. These data indicate that FGFR signaling can be regulated at the level of intracellular interactions and that signaling pathways for neurite outgrowth and mitogenesis use different regions of the FGFR.     

Role of FGFs in skeletal muscle and limb development

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are a family of nine proteins that bind to three distinct types of cell surface molecules: (i) FGF receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFR-1 through FGFR-4); (ii) a cysteine-rich FGF receptor (CFR); and (iii) heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). Signaling by FGFs requires participation of at least two of these receptors: the FGFRs and HSPGs form a signaling complex. The length and sulfation pattern of the heparan sulfate chain determines both the activity of the signaling complex and, in part, the ligand specificity for FGFR-1. Thus, the heparan sulfate proteoglycans are likely to play an essential role in signaling. We have recently identified a role for FGF in limb bud development in vivo. In the chick limb bud, ectopic expression of the 18 kDa form of FGF-2 or FGF-2 fused to an artificial signal peptide at its amino terminus causes skeletal duplications. These data, and the observations that FGF-2 is localized to the subjacent mesoderm and the apical ectodermal ridge in the early developing limb, suggest that FGF-2 plays an important role in limb outgrowth. We propose that FGF-2 is an apical ectodermal ridgederived factor that participates in limb outgrowth and patterning. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Expression of EGF receptor and FGF receptor isoforms during neuroepithelial stem cell differentiation

To characterize the role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) in regulating neuroepithelial stem cells differentiation, we have examined the expression of FGF, EGF, and their receptors by neuroepithelial (NEP) cells and their derivatives. Our results indicate that undifferentiated NEP cells express a subset of FGF receptor (FGFR) isoforms, but do not express platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs) or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The FGFR pattern of expression by differentiated neuron and glial cells differs from that found on NEP stem cells. FGFR-4 is uniquely expressed on NEP cells, while FGFR-1 is expressed by both NEP cells and neurons, and FGFR-2 is down-regulated during neuronal differentiation. FGFRs present on astrocytes and oligodendrocytes also represent a subset of those present on NEP cells. Expression of FGF and EGF by NEP cells and their progeny was also examined. NEP cells synthesize detectable levels of both FGF-1 and FGF-2, and EGF. FGF-1 and FGF-2 synthesis is likely to be biologically relevant, as cells grown at high density do not require exogenous FGF for their survival and cells grown in the presence of neutralizing antibodies to FGF show a reduction in cell survival and division. Thus, neuroepithelial cells synthesize and respond to FGF, but not to EGF, and are therefore distinct from other neural stem cells (neurospheres). The unique pattern of expression of FGF isoforms may serve to distinguish NEP cells from their more differentiated progeny.     

Heparin differentially regulates the interaction of fibroblast growth factor-4 with FGF receptors 1 and 2.

Fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF4), like other FGFs, shares a high affinity for the anionic glycosaminoglycans heparin and heparan sulfate (HS), which in turn enhance FGF-receptor (FGFR) binding and activation. Here we demonstrate using a cell free system that, at low concentrations of heparin, FGF4 binds only to FGFR-2, while much higher heparin levels are required for binding to FGFR-1. Chemical crosslinking of radiolabeled FGF4 to the soluble FGF receptors confirms the preferential formation of FGF4-FGFR-2 complexes under restricted heparin availability, with maximal ligand-receptor interactions at almost 20-fold lower heparin concentrations then those required for the affinity labeling of FGFR-1. In accordance, HS-deficient cells expressing FGFR-2 proliferate in response to FGF4 at extremely low exogenous heparin concentrations, while FGFR-1 expressing cells are completely unresponsive under the same conditions. We suggest that FGFR-2 is the preferred receptor for FGF4 under restricted HS conditions and that the bioavailability of structurally distinct HS motifs may differentially control receptor specificity of FGF4 in vivo.     

Fibroblast growth factor receptors have different signaling and mitogenic potentials.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors (FGFRs) are structurally related receptor protein tyrosine kinases encoded by four distinct genes. Activation of FGFR-1, -2, and -3 by FGFs induces mitogenic responses in various cell types, but the mitogenic potential of FGFR-4 has not been previously explored. We have compared the properties of BaF3 murine lymphoid cells and L6 rat myoblast cells engineered to express FGFR-1 or FGFR-4. Acidic FGF binds with high affinity to and elicits tyrosine phosphorylation of FGFR-1 or FGFR-4 receptors displayed on BaF3 cells, but only FGFR-1 activation leads to cell survival and growth. FGFR-4 activation also fails to elicit detectable signals characteristic of the FGFR-1 response: tyrosine phosphorylation of SHC and extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) proteins and induction of fos and tis11 RNA expression. The only detected response to FGFR-4 activation was weak phosphorylation of phospholipase C gamma. A chimeric receptor containing the extracellular domain of FGFR-4 and the intracellular domain of FGFR-1 confers FGF-dependent growth upon transfected BaF3 cells, demonstrating that the intracellular domains of the receptors dictate their functional capacity. Activation of FGFR-1 in transfected L6 myoblasts induced far stronger phosphorylation of phospholipase C gamma, SHC, and ERK proteins than could activation of FGFR-4 in L6 cells, and only FGFR-1 activation induced tyrosine phosphorylation of a characteristic 80-kD protein. Hence, the signaling and biological responses elicited by different FGF receptors substantially differ.     

Targeted disruption of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 blocks maturation of visceral endoderm and cavitation in mouse embryoid bodies

The cellular response to fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) is mediated by receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFR-1 - 4) whose patterns of expression are spatially and temporally restricted during embryogenesis. These receptors have differential ligand binding capacities and are coupled to diverse signalling pathways. In the present study, we have characterized the ability of FGFR-1-deficient mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to bind FGF-2 and to proliferate in the absence or presence of exogenous FGF-2. Under the same conditions, we also analysed the differentiation of FGFR-1-deficient ES cells into three dimensional, post-implantation, embryonic tissues, known as embryoid bodies (EBs). We show that the targeted disruption of FGFR-1 leads to a reduced binding of FGF-2 which has no significant effect on the proliferation of undifferentiated ES cells. In addition, lack of functional FGFR-1 in differentiating EBs leads to a reduced expression of the endoderm marker gene alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). This deregulation of the AFP gene correlates with defects in the formation of the visceral endoderm, proper differentiation of the ectoderm and thus the organization of the columnar epithelium, and a block of cavitation. Although the addition of exogenous FGF-2 further reduced the expression of AFPmRNA in differentiating mutant EBs, corresponding morphological changes were not observed. Our results indicate that FGFR-1 may play a vital role in endoderm formation.     

A distinct basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2)/FGF receptor interaction distinguishes urokinase-type plasminogen activator induction from mitogenicity in endothelial cells.

Basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) induces cell proliferation and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) production in fetal bovine aortic endothelial GM 7373 cells. In the present paper we investigated the role of the interaction of FGF-2 with tyrosine-kinase (TK) FGF receptors (FGFRs) in mediating uPA up-regulation in these cells. The results show that FGF-2 antagonists suramin, protamine, heparin, the synthetic peptide FGF-2(112-155), and a soluble form of FGFR-1 do not inhibit FGF-2-mediated uPA up-regulation at concentrations that affect growth factor binding to cell surface receptors and mitogenic activity. In contrast, tyrosine phosphorylation inhibitors and overexpression of a dominant negative TK- mutant of FGFR-1 abolish the uPA-inducing activity of FGF-2, indicating that FGFR and its TK activity are essential in mediating uPA induction. Accordingly, FGF-2 induces uPA up-regulation in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with wild-type FGFR-1, -2, -3, or -4 but not with TK- FGFR-1 mutant. Small unilamellar phosphatidyl choline:cholesterol vesicles loaded with FGF-2 increased uPA production in GM 7373 cells in the absence of a mitogenic response. Liposome-encapsulated FGF-2 showed a limited but significant capacity, relative to free FGF-2, to interact with FGFR both at 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C and to be internalized within the cell. uPA up-regulation by liposome-encapsulated FGF-2 was quenched by neutralizing anti-FGF-2 antibodies, indicating that the activity of liposome-delivered FGF-2 is mediated by an extracellular action of the growth factor. Taken together, the data indicate that a distinct interaction of FGF-2 with FGFR, quantitatively and/or qualitatively different from the one that leads to mitogenicity, is responsible for the uPA-inducing activity of the growth factor.     

Prostaglandin E2 regulates angiogenesis via activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1

Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) behaves as a mitogen in epithelial tumor cells as well as in many other cell types. We investigated the actions of PGE(2) on microvascular endothelial cells (capillary venular endothelial cells) with the purpose of delineating the signaling pathway leading to the acquisition of the angiogenic phenotype and to new vessel formation. PGE(2) (100 nM) produced activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR-1), as measured by its phosphorylation, but not of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. PGE(2) stimulated the EP3 subtype receptor, as deduced by abrogation of EP3 Galpha(i) subunit activity through pertussis toxin. Consistent with this result, in human umbilical venular endothelial cells missing the EP3 receptor, PGE(2) did not phosphorylate FGFR-1. Upon binding to its receptor, PGE(2) initiated an autocrine/paracrine signaling cascade involving the intracellular activation of c-Src, activation of matrix metalloproteinase (predominantly MMP2), which in turn caused the mobilization of membrane-anchored fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). In fact, in cells unable to release FGF-2 the transfection with both FGFR-1 and EP3 did not result in FGFR-1 phosphorylation in response to PGE(2). Relevance for the FGF2-FGFR-1 system was highlighted by confocal analysis, showing receptor internalization after cell exposure to the prostanoid. ERK1/2 appeared to be the distal signal involved, its phosphorylation being sensitive to either cSrc inhibitor or FGFR-1 blocker. Finally, PGE(2) stimulated cell migration and capillary formation in aortic rings, which were severely reduced by inhibitors of signaling molecules or by receptor antagonist. In conclusion, this study provides evidence for the involvement of FGFR-1 through FGF2 in eliciting PGE(2) angiogenic responses. This signaling pattern is similar to the autocrine-paracrine mechanism which operates in endothelial cells to support neovascular growth.     

A novel type I fibroblast growth factor receptor activates mitogenic signaling in the absence of detectable tyrosine phosphorylation of FRS2

A novel variant of the fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1 (FGFR-1) was identified in human placental RNA. In this receptor (FGFR-1L) portions of the second and third immunoglobulin-like (Ig-like) domains are deleted. To determine whether FGFR-1L was functional, full-length variant (pSV/FGFR-1L) and wild-type (pSV/FGFR-1) receptors were stably transfected into rat L6 myoblasts cells. Transfected L6 clones expressed respective proteins and bound (125)I-labeled FGF-2 with K(d) values of 99 pm (FGFR-1) and 26 pm (FGFR-1L). FGF-1 and FGF-2 competed efficiently with (125)I-FGF-2 for binding to FGFR-1 and FGFR-1L, whereas FGF-4 was less efficient. FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGF-4 enhanced mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity, increased steady-state c-fos mRNA levels, and stimulated proliferation through either receptor, whereas KGF was without effect. FGFR-1 expressing clones exhibited ligand-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2), a 90-kDa adaptor protein that links FGFR-1 activation to the MAPK cascade. In contrast, tyrosine phosphorylation of FRS2 was not evident with FGFR-1L. In addition, phospholipase C-gamma was not tyrosine phosphorylated via activated FGFR-1L. These findings indicate that FGFR-1L binds FGF-1 and FGF-2 with high affinity and is capable of mitogenic signaling, but may activate MAPK to occur via non-classical signaling intermediates.     

Normal Human Fibroblasts Produce Membrane-Bound and Soluble Isoforms of FGFR-1

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are polypeptide mitogens for a wide variety of cell types and are involved in other processes such as angiogenesis and cell differentiation. FGFs mediate their biological responses by activating high-affinity tyrosine kinase receptors. Currently, there are four human fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genes. To investigate the mechanisms by which αFGF and βFGF may mediate mitogenic signal transduction in human skin-derived fibroblasts, we analyzed these cells for the presence of high-affinity FGFRs. We show that normal human dermal fibroblasts express a single high-affinity FGFR gene, FGFR-1. Cloning and sequencing of two distinct FGFR-1 cDNAs suggested that normal human dermal fibroblasts express a membrane-bound and a putatively secreted form of FGFR-1. We show that normal human dermal fibroblasts produce two FGFR-1 proteins, one of which exists in conditioned media. The mRNA for the putatively secreted form of FGFR-1 appears to be down-regulated by serum treatment of the cells.     

Alternatively spliced FGFR-1 isoform signaling differentially modulates endothelial cell responses to peroxynitrite

Mounting experimental evidence has suggested that the trophic environment of cells in culture is an important determinant of their vulnerability to the cytotoxic effects of reactive oxidants such as peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)). However, acidic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-1)-induced signaling renders some cells more sensitive and others resistant to the cytotoxic effects of ONOO(-). To determine whether alternatively spliced fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR-1) isoforms are responsible for this differential response, we have stably transfected FGFR-negative rat brain-derived resistant vessel endothelial cells (RVEC) with human cDNA sequences encoding either FGFR-1 alpha or FGFR-1 beta. FGF-1 treatment of RVEC(R-1 alpha) transfectants enhanced ONOO(-)-mediated cell death in a manner dependent upon FGFR-1 tyrosine kinase, MEK/Erk 1/2 kinase, and p38 MAP kinase activities and independent of Src-family kinase (SFK) activity. FGF-1 treatment of RVEC(R-1 beta) transfectants inhibited the cytotoxic effects of ONOO(-) in a manner dependent upon FGFR-1 tyrosine kinase, MEK/Erk 1/2 kinase, and SFK activities and independent of p38 MAP kinase activity. FGF-1-induced preactivation of both FGFR-1 tyrosine and Erk 1/2 kinases was detected in both RVEC(R-1 alpha) and RVEC(R-1 beta) transfectants. FGF-1-induced preactivation of p38 MAPK was restricted to RVEC(R-1 alpha) transfectants, whereas, ligand-induced preactivation of SFK was limited to RVEC(R-1 beta) transfectants. Collectively, these results both reemphasize the role of extracellular trophic factors and their receptor-mediated signaling pathways during cellular responses to oxidant stress and provide a first indication that the alternatively spliced FGFR-1 isoforms induce differential signal transduction pathways.     

Heparin can activate a receptor tyrosine kinase.

Heparin, a densely sulfated glycosaminoglycan produced by mast cells, is best known for its inhibitory effects on the blood coagulation system. Heparin or heparan sulfate proteoglycans are also essential cofactors for the interaction of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) with their receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs). Here we show that heparin is a growth factor-independent activating ligand for FGFR-4. Heparin stimulates FGFR-4 autophosphorylation on transfected myoblasts, fibroblasts and lymphoid cells, and is most potent on cells lacking surface heparan proteoglycan. Two functional analogs of heparin, fucoidan and dextran sulfate, are also activators of FGFR-4, while neither heparin nor its analogs can stimulate FGFR-1 in the absence of FGF. A mutation in the FGFR-4 ectodomain which impairs receptor activation by FGFs does not interfere with activation by heparin, demonstrating that receptor domains required for heparin or FGF activation are not identical. Heparin activation of FGFR-4 or of a chimeric receptor bearing FGFR-4 ectodomain and FGFR-1 cytodomain triggers downstream tyrosine phosphorylation of several signaling proteins, and induces proliferation of cells bearing the chimeric receptor. Consistent with these findings, a soluble FGFR-4 ectodomain has strong FGF-independent affinity for immobilized heparin resin, while soluble FGFR-1 requires FGF for stable heparin interaction. Heparin activation of FGFR-4 is the first example of a mammalian polysaccharide serving as a signaling ligand.