Development of RNA polymerase-promoter contacts during open complex formation.

We have charted the movements of E sigma 32 RNA polymerase at the heat-shock promoter PgroE throughout open complex formation, using hydroxyl radical footprinting. In combination with methylation protection and DNase I experiments, these data suggest the following model for open complex formation. E sigma 32 initially anchors itself in the upstream region of the promoter forming the first closed complex, RPC1; in this complex the enzyme makes backbone contacts in the -35 region of the promoter that are maintained throughout open complex formation. An isomerization follows resulting in a second closed complex, RPC2; in this complex the enzyme makes base-specific and backbone contacts in the -10 region that are almost identical to those found in the open complex. Thus, at the groE promoter, upstream contacts are established in RPC1 and downstream contacts in RPC2. A similar pattern of backbone contacts was obtained for E sigma 32 bound in the open complex at two additional heat-shock promoters, suggesting that the overall topology of holoenzyme in the open complex is similar regardless of sequence variations in the promoter.     

Specific recognition of the -10 promoter element by the free RNA polymerase sigma subunit

Bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme relies on its sigma subunit for promoter recognition and opening. In the holoenzyme, regions 2 and 4 of the sigma subunit are positioned at an optimal distance to allow specific recognition of the -10 and -35 promoter elements, respectively. In free sigma, the promoter binding regions are positioned closer to each other and are masked for interactions with the promoter, with sigma region 1 playing a role in the masking. To analyze the DNA-binding properties of the free sigma, we selected single-stranded DNA aptamers that are specific to primary sigma subunits from several bacterial species, including Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus. The aptamers share a consensus motif, TGTAGAAT, that is similar to the extended -10 promoter. We demonstrate that recognition of this motif by sigma region 2 occurs without major structural rearrangements of sigma observed upon the holoenzyme formation and is not inhibited by sigma regions 1 and 4. Thus, the complex process of the -10 element recognition by RNA polymerase holoenzyme can be reduced to a simple system consisting of an isolated sigma subunit and a short aptamer oligonucleotide.     

On the role of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase sigma 70 region 4.2 and alpha-subunit C-terminal domains in promoter complex formation on the extended -10 galP1 promoter

Bacterial promoters of the extended -10 class contain a single consensus element, and the DNA sequence upstream of this element is not critical for promoter activity. Open promoter complexes can be formed on an extended -10 Escherichia coli galP1 promoter at temperatures as low as 6 degrees C, when complexes on most promoters are closed. Here, we studied the contribution of upstream contacts to promoter complex formation using galP1 and its derivatives lacking the extended -10 motif and/or containing the -35 promoter consensus element. A panel of E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzymes containing two, one, or no alpha-subunit C-terminal domains (alpha CTD) and either wild-type sigma 70 subunit or sigma 70 lacking region 4.2 was assembled and tested for promoter complex formation. At 37 degrees C, alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 were individually dispensable for promoter complex formation on galP1 derivatives with extended -10 motif. However, no promoter complexes formed when both alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 were absent. Thus, in the context of an extended -10 promoter, alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 interactions with upstream DNA can functionally substitute for each other. In contrast, at low temperature, alpha CTD and sigma 70 region 4.2 interactions with upstream DNA were found to be functionally distinct, for sigma 70 region 4.2 but not alpha CTD was required for open promoter complex formation on galP1 derivatives with extended -10 motif. We propose a model involving sigma 70 region 4.2 interaction with the beta flap domain that explains these observations.     

Protein-induced DNA bending clarifies the architectural organization of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter

Sigma54-RNA polymerase (Esigma54) predominantly contacts one face of the DNA helix in the closed promoter complex, and interacts with the upstream enhancer-bound activator via DNA looping. Up to date, the precise face of Esigma54 that contacts the activator to convert the closed complex to an open one remains unclear. By introducing protein-induced DNA bends at precise locations between upstream enhancer sequences and the core promoter of the sigma54-dependent glnAp2 promoter without changing the distance in-between, we observed a strong enhanced or decreased promoter activity, especially on linear DNA templates in vitro. The relative positioning and orientations of Esigma54, DNA bending protein and enhancer-bound activator on linear DNA were determined by in vitro footprinting analysis. Intriguingly, the locations from which the DNA bending protein exerted its optimal stimulatory effects were all found on the opposite face of the DNA helix compared with the DNA bound Esigma54 in the closed complex. Therefore, these results provide evidence that the activator must approach the Esigma54 closed complexes from the unbound face of the promoter DNA helix to catalyse open complex formation. This proposal is further supported by the modelling of activator-promoter DNA-Esigma54 complex.     

Recruitment of sigma54-RNA polymerase to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida through integration host factor-mediated positioning switch of alpha subunit carboxyl-terminal domain on an UP-like element

The interactions between the sigma54-containing RNA polymerase (sigma54-RNAP) and the region of the Pseudomonas putida Pu promoter spanning from the enhancer to the binding site for the integration host factor (IHF) were analyzed both by DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting. A short Pu region centered at position -104 was found to be involved in the interaction with sigma54-RNAP, both in the absence and in the presence of IHF protein. Deletion or scrambling of the -104 region strongly reduced promoter affinity in vitro and promoter activity in vivo, respectively. The reduction in promoter affinity coincided with the loss of IHF-mediated recruitment of the sigma54-RNAP in vitro. The experiments with oriented-alpha sigma54-RNAP derivatives containing bound chemical nuclease revealed interchangeable positioning of only one of the two alpha subunit carboxyl-terminal domains (alphaCTDs) both at the -104 region and in the surroundings of position -78. The addition of IHF resulted in perfect position symmetry of the two alphaCTDs. These results indicate that, in the absence of IHF, the sigma54-RNAP asymmetrically uses only one alphaCTD subunit to establish productive contacts with upstream sequences of the Pu promoter. In the presence of IHF-induced curvature, the closer proximity of the upstream DNA to the body of the sigma54-RNAP can allow the other alphaCTD to be engaged in and thus favor closed complex formation.