Common structural elements in the architecture of the cofactor-binding domains in unrelated families of pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzymes

A detailed comparison of the structures of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine race-mase, the beta subunit of tryptophan synthase, D-amino acid aminotransferase and glycogen phosphorylase has revealed more extensive structural similarities among pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-binding domains in these enzymes than was observed previously. These similarities consist of seven common structural segments of the polypeptide chain, which form an extensive common structural organization of the backbone chain responsible for the appropriate disposition of key residues, some from the aligned fragments and some from variable loops joined to these fragments, interacting with PLPs in these enzymes. This common structural organization contains an analogous hydrophobic minicore formed from four amino acid side chains present in the two most conserved structural elements. In addition, equivalent alpha-beta-alpha-beta supersecondary structures are formed by these seven fragments in three of the five structures: alanine racemase, tryptophan synthase and glycogen phosphorylase. Despite these similarities, it is generally accepted that these proteins do not share a common heritage, but have arisen on five separate occasions. The common and contiguous alpha-beta-alpha-beta structure accounts for only 28 residues and all five enzymes differ greatly in both the orientation of the PLP pyridoxal rings and their contacts with residues close to the common structural elements.     

Production of RNA by a polymerase protein encapsulated within phospholipid vesicles

Catalyzed polymerization reactions represent a primary anabolic activity of all cells. It can be assumed that early cells carried out such reactions, in which macromolecular catalysts were encapsulated within some type of boundary membrane. In the experiments described here, we show that a template-independent RNA polymerase (polynucleotide phosphorylase) can be encapsulated in dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine vesicles without substrate. When the substrate adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was provided externally, long-chain RNA polymers were synthesized within the vesicles. Substrate flux was maximized by maintaining the vesicles at the phase transition temperature of the component lipid. A protease was introduced externally as an additional control. Free enzyme was inactivated under identical conditions. RNA products were visualized in situ by ethidium bromide fluorescence. The products were harvested from the liposomes, radiolabeled, and analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Encapsulated catalysts represent a model for primitive cellular systems in which an RNA polymerase was entrapped within a protected microenvironment.Abbreviations ADP adenosine diphosphate - DMPC dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine - EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid - LUV large unilamellar vesicle - MLV multilamellar vesicle - PAGE polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis - PNPase or PNP polynucleotide phosphorylase - SUV small unilamellar vesicle Correspondence to.: A.C. Chakrabarti     

Untersuchungen am Phloemexsudat von Cucurbita pepo L.

Summary Tests for enzymes of gluconeogenesis and of the synthesis and degradation of sucrose and polysaccharides have been carried out in the phloem exudate of Cucurbita pepo. All the enzymes which are necessary for the synthesis of sucrose and polysaccharides from metabolites of the citric acid cycle were found to be present in the exudate, except phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase. The polysaccharide synthetase was found to exhibit higher activity with glycogen (which is an unnatural polysaccharide in higher plants) than with starch. In addition, polysaccharide synthetase activity could be increased remarkably with 2 mM glucose-6-phosphate and glycogen as primer. Among the enzymes which catabolize sucrose and polysaccharides (phosphorylase, invertase, sucrose phosphorylase), only sucrose phosphorylase showed activity.     

Addressing the problems of base pairing and strand cyclization in template-directed synthesis: a case for the utility and necessity of 'molecular midwives' and reversible backbone linkages for the origin of proto-RNA

Nucleic acid synthesis is precisely controlled in living organisms by highly evolved protein enzymes. The remarkable fidelity of information transfer realized between template and product strands is the result of both the spatial selectivity of the polymerase active site for Watson-Crick base pairs at the point of nucleotide coupling and subsequent proof-reading mechanisms. In the absence of naturally derived polymerases, in vitro template-directed synthesis by means of chemically activated mononucleotides has proven remarkably inefficient and error-prone. Nevertheless, the spontaneous emergence of RNA polymers and their protein-free replication is frequently taken as a prerequisite for the hypothetical 'RNA world'. We present two specific difficulties that face the de novo synthesis of RNA-like polymers in a prebiotic (enzyme-free) environment: nucleoside base selection and intramolecular strand cyclization. These two problems are inherent to the assumption that RNA formed de novo from pre-existing, chemically-activated mononucleotides in solution. As a possible resolution to these problems, we present arguments and experimental support for our hypothesis that small molecules (referred to as 'molecular midwives') and alternative backbone linkages (under equilibrium control) facilitated the emergence of the first RNA-like polymers of life.     

Regulation of Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase by ATP

Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), an enzyme conserved in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles, processively catalyzes the phosphorolysis of RNA, releasing nucleotide diphosphates, and the reverse polymerization reaction. In Escherichia coli, both reactions are implicated in RNA decay, as addition of either poly(A) or heteropolymeric tails targets RNA to degradation. PNPase may also be associated with the RNA degradosome, a heteromultimeric protein machine that can degrade highly structured RNA. Here, we report that ATP binds to PNPase and allosterically inhibits both its phosphorolytic and polymerization activities. Our data suggest that PNPase-dependent RNA tailing and degradation occur mainly at low ATP concentrations, whereas other enzymes may play a more significant role at high energy charge. These findings connect RNA turnover with the energy charge of the cell and highlight unforeseen metabolic roles of PNPase.     

The origin of polynucleotide phosphorylase domains

In this report, we document the presence of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) in the animal eukaryotes. These proteins contain several domains, including 2 RNase PH domains (PNPase 1 and PNPase 2) which are closely related functionally and in sequence similarity to ribonuclease PH (RPH) protein. Phylogenetic analysis of the gene genealogy of these three domains suggests that PNPase was formed via a duplication event that also produced the RNase PH protein. Given the current distribution of these domains in the tree of life, these duplication events most likely occurred in the common ancestor of the three organismal superkingdoms, Archaea, Eukarya, and Bacteria. In particular, PNPase 2 and RPH are more closely related to each other than either one is to PNPase 1, suggesting a deeper differentiation of PNPase 1 in the common organismal ancestor. In addition, while PNPase 1 and PNPase 2 appear to have the same evolutionary signal as determined by the incongruence length difference (ILD) test, RPH appears to have an incongruent signal with both of the PNPase domains. This result suggests that RPH experienced different evolutionary divergence patterns than the PNPase domains, consistent with the linked nature of the two PNPase domains.     

Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Core Bound to RNase E, RNA and Manganese: Implications for Catalytic Mechanism and RNA Degradosome Assembly

Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is a processive exoribonuclease that contributes to messenger RNA turnover and quality control of ribosomal RNA precursors in many bacterial species. In Escherichia coli, a proportion of the PNPase is recruited into a multi-enzyme assembly, known as the RNA degradosome, through an interaction with the scaffolding domain of the endoribonuclease RNase E. Here, we report crystal structures of E. coli PNPase complexed with the recognition site from RNase E and with manganese in the presence or in the absence of modified RNA. The homotrimeric PNPase engages RNase E on the periphery of its ring-like architecture through a pseudo-continuous anti-parallel β-sheet. A similar interaction pattern occurs in the structurally homologous human exosome between the Rrp45 and Rrp46 subunits. At the centre of the PNPase ring is a tapered channel with an adjustable aperture where RNA bases stack on phenylalanine side chains and trigger structural changes that propagate to the active sites. Manganese can substitute for magnesium as an essential co-factor for PNPase catalysis, and our crystal structure of the enzyme in complex with manganese suggests how the metal is positioned to stabilise the transition state. We discuss the implications of these structural observations for the catalytic mechanism of PNPase, its processive mode of action, and its assembly into the RNA degradosome.     

RNase E forms a complex with polynucleotide phosphorylase in cyanobacteria via a cyanobacterial-specific nonapeptide in the noncatalytic region

RNase E, a central component involved in bacterial RNA metabolism, usually has a highly conserved N-terminal catalytic domain but an extremely divergent C-terminal domain. While the C-terminal domain of RNase E in Escherichia coli recruits other components to form an RNA degradation complex, it is unknown if a similar function can be found for RNase E in other organisms due to the divergent feature of this domain. Here, we provide evidence showing that RNase E forms a complex with another essential ribonuclease—the polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase)—in cyanobacteria, a group of ecologically important and phylogenetically ancient organisms. Sequence alignment for all cyanobacterial RNase E proteins revealed several conserved and variable subregions in their noncatalytic domains. One such subregion, an extremely conserved nonapeptide (RRRRRRSSA) located near the very end of RNase E, serves as the PNPase recognition site in both the filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC7120 and the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. These results indicate that RNase E and PNPase form a ribonuclease complex via a common mechanism in cyanobacteria. The PNPase-recognition motif in cyanobacterial RNase E is distinct from those previously identified in Proteobacteria, implying a mechanism of coevolution for PNPase and RNase E in different organisms.     

The PNPase,exosome and RNA helicases as the building components of evolutionarily-conserved RNA degradation machines

The structure and function of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and the exosome, as well as their associated RNA-helicases proteins, are described in the light of recent studies. The picture raised is of an evolutionarily conserved RNA-degradation machine which exonucleolytically degrades RNA from 3′ to 5′. In prokaryotes and in eukaryotic organelles, a trimeric complex of PNPase forms a circular doughnut-shaped structure, in which the phosphorolysis catalytic sites are buried inside the barrel-shaped complex, while the RNA binding domains create a pore where RNA enters, reminiscent of the protein degrading complex, the proteasome. In some archaea and in the eukaryotes, several different proteins form a similar circle-shaped complex, the exosome, that is responsible for 3′ to 5′ exonucleolytic degradation of RNA as part of the processing, quality control, and general RNA degradation process. Both PNPase in prokaryotes and the exosome in eukaryotes are found in association with protein complexes that notably include RNA helicase.     

Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Functions as Both an Exonuclease and a Poly(A) Polymerase in Spinach Chloroplasts

The molecular mechanism of mRNA degradation in the chloroplast consists of sequential events including endonucleolytic cleavage, the addition of poly(A)-rich sequences to the endonucleolytic cleavage products, and exonucleolytic degradation by polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). In Escherichia coli, polyadenylation is performed mainly by poly(A)-polymerase (PAP) I or by PNPase in its absence. While trying to purify the chloroplast PAP by following in vitro polyadenylation activity, it was found to copurify with PNPase and indeed could not be separated from it. Purified PNPase was able to polyadenylate RNA molecules with an activity similar to that of lysed chloroplasts. Both activities use ADP much more effectively than ATP and are inhibited by stem-loop structures. The activity of PNPase was directed to RNA degradation or polymerization by manipulating physiologically relevant concentrations of P(i) and ADP. As expected of a phosphorylase, P(i) enhanced degradation, whereas ADP inhibited degradation and enhanced polymerization. In addition, searching the complete Arabidopsis genome revealed several putative PAPs, none of which were preceded by a typical chloroplast transit peptide. These results suggest that there is no enzyme similar to E. coli PAP I in spinach chloroplasts and that polyadenylation and exonucleolytic degradation of RNA in spinach chloroplasts are performed by one enzyme, PNPase.     

Integration of chloroplast nucleic acid metabolism into the phosphate deprivation response in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

Cell survival depends on the cell's ability to acclimate to phosphorus (P) limitation. We studied the chloroplast ribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), which consumes and generates phosphate, by comparing wild-type Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cells with strains with reduced PNPase expression. In the wild type, chloroplast RNA (cpRNA) accumulates under P limitation, correlating with reduced PNPase expression. PNPase-deficient strains do not exhibit cpRNA variation under these conditions, suggesting that in the wild type PNPase limits cpRNA accumulation under P stress. PNPase levels appear to be mediated by the P response regulator PHOSPHORUS STARVATION RESPONSE1 (PSR1), because in psr1 mutant cells, cpRNA declines under P limitation and PNPase expression is not reduced. PNPase-deficient cells begin to lose viability after 24 h of P depletion, suggesting that PNPase is important for cellular acclimation. PNPase-deficient strains do not have enhanced sensitivity to other physiological or nutrient stresses, and their RNA and cell growth phenotypes are not observed under P stress with phosphite, a phosphate analog that blocks the stress signal. In contrast with RNA metabolism, chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) levels declined under P deprivation, suggesting that P mobilization occurs from DNA rather than RNA. This unusual phenomenon, which is phosphite- and PSR1-insensitive, may have evolved as a result of the polyploid nature of cpDNA and the requirement of P for cpRNA degradation by PNPase.     

Modulation of yersinia type three secretion system by the S1 domain of polynucleotide phosphorylase

Both low temperatures and encounters with host phagocytes are two stresses that have been relatively well studied in many species of bacteria. Previous work has shown that the exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is required for Yersiniae to grow at low temperatures. Here, we show that PNPase also enhances the ability of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia pestis to withstand the killing activities of murine macrophages. PNPase is required for the optimal functioning of the Yersinia type three secretion system (TTSS), an organelle that injects effector proteins directly into host cells. Unexpectedly, the effect of PNPase on the TTSS is independent of its ribonuclease activity and instead requires its S1 RNA binding domain. In contrast, catalytically inactive enzyme does not enhance the low temperature growth effect of PNPase. Surprisingly, wild-type-like TTSS functioning was restored to the pnp mutant strain by expressing just the approximately 70 amino acid S1 domains from either PNPase, RNase R, RNase II, or RpsA. Our findings suggest that PNPase plays multifaceted roles in enhancing Yersinia survival in response to stressful conditions.     

Regulation of the activity of rabbit skeletal muscle phosphorylase kinase by glycogen

The effects of glycogen on the non-activated and activated forms of phosphorylase kinase were studied. It was found that in the presence of glycogen the activity of non-activated kinase at pH 6.8 and 8.2 and that of the activated (in the course of phosphorylation) form are enhanced. The degree of activation depends on glycogen concentration. At saturating concentrations, this enzyme activity increases 2-3-fold; the enzyme affinity for the protein substrate, phosphorylase b, also shows an increase. The polysaccharide has no effect on the activity of phosphorylase kinase stimulated by limited proteolysis. In the presence of glycogen, the rate of autocatalytic phosphorylation of the enzyme is increased. Glycogen stabilizes the enzyme activity upon dilution. The experimental results suggest that the polysaccharide directly affects the phosphorylase kinase molecule. The maximal binding was shown to occur at the enzyme/polysaccharide ratio of 1:10 (w/w) in the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+.     

Chloroplast PNPase exists as a homo-multimer enzyme complex that is distinct from the Escherichia coli degradosome.

In Escherichia coli, the exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), the endoribonuclease RNase E, a DEAD-RNA helicase and the glycolytic enzyme enolase are associated with a high molecular weight complex, the degradosome. This complex has an important role in processing and degradation of RNA. Chloroplasts contain an exoribonuclease homologous to E. coli PNPase. Size exclusion chromatography revealed that chloroplast PNPase elutes as a 580-600 kDa complex, suggesting that it can form an enzyme complex similar to the E. coli degradosome. Biochemical and mass-spectrometric analysis showed, however, that PNPase is the only protein associated with the 580-600 kDa complex. Similarly, a purified recombinant chloroplast PNPase also eluted as a 580-600 kDa complex after gel filtration chromatography. These results suggest that chloroplast PNPase exists as a homo-multimer complex. No other chloroplast proteins were found to associate with chloroplast PNPase during affinity chromatography. Database analysis of proteins homologous to E. coli RNase E revealed that chloroplast and cyanobacterial proteins lack the C-terminal domain of the E. coli protein that is involved in assembly of the degradosome. Together, our results suggest that PNPase does not form a degradosome-like complex in the chloroplast. Thus, RNA processing and degradation in this organelle differ in several respects from those in E. coli.     

Experimental Evidence That GNA and TNA Were Not Sequential Polymers in the Prebiotic Evolution of RNA

Systematic investigation into the chemical etiology of ribose has led to the discovery of glycerol nucleic acid (GNA) and threose nucleic acid (TNA) as possible progenitor candidates of RNA in the origins of life. Coupled with their chemical simplicity, polymers for both systems are capable of forming stable Watson-Crick antiparallel duplex structures with themselves and RNA, thereby providing a mechanism for the transfer of genetic information between successive genetic systems. Investigation into whether both polymers arose independently or descended from a common evolutionary pathway would provide additional constraints on models that describe the emergence of a hypothetical RNA world. Here we show by thermal denaturation that complementary GNA and TNA mixed sequence polymers are unable, even after prolonged incubation times, to adopt stable helical structures by intersystem cross-pairing. This experimental observation suggests that GNA and TNA, whose structures derive from one another, were not consecutive polymers in the same evolutionary pathway to RNA. Reviewing Editor: Dr. Niles Lehman