The subunit structure of chromatin fibres

Optimal conditions for studying the ultrastructure of chromatin fibers of histone-containing spermatozoa in thin sections have been determined. Better results for preservation in sperm of the sea cucumber Holothuria tubulosa, have been found than in different frog species studied. The fine structure of chromatin fibers after different treatments was studied by computer methods. A clear superbead structure was found under all conditions which preserve the chromatin fibres. These have a diameter of 30 nm, with superbeads about 33 nm long. In the best preserved cases an additional periodicity of 11 nm along the fibres was found. There is no clear relationship of this periodicity with an eventual solenoidal structure of the chromatin fibers.     

The subunit structure of mouse satellite chromatin.

Atomic coordinates are presented for the 3740 atoms other than hydrogen in the dimeric molecule of chicken muscle triose phosphate isomerase. They are derived from an electron-density map at 2.5Åresolution, interpreted in terms of the known amino-acid sequence, and they have been adjusted systematically to give stereochemically appropriate bond lengths and angles.     

The subunit structure of chromatin from Physarum polycephalum.

Nucleosome DNA repeat lengths in Physarum chromatin, determined by nuclease digestion experiments, are shorter than those observed in most mammalian chromatin and longer than those reported for chromatin of certain other lower eukaryotes. After digestion with staphylococcal nuclease for short periods of time an average repeat length of 190 base pairs is measured. After more extensive digestion an average repeat length of 172 base pairs is measured. Upon prolonged digestion DNA is degraded to an average monomer subunit length of 160 base pairs, with only a small amount of DNA found in lengths of 130 base pairs or smaller. Mathematical analysis of the data suggests that the Physarum nucleosome DNA repeat comprises a protected DNA segment of about 159 base pairs with a nuclease-accessible interconnecting segment which ranges from 13 to 31 base pairs. The spacing data are compatible with measurements from electron micrographs of Physarum chromatin.     

Evidence for a subunit structure of chromatin in mouse myeloma cells

If micrococcal nuclease is allowed to digest chromatin as it exists inside intact nuclei isolated from mouse myeloma tissue culture cells, more than 60% of the DNA can be isolated as a homogeneous fragment on a sucrose gradient. Analytical ultracentrifugation indicates that the protected DNA is native, unnicked, and about 140 +/- 10 base pairs long. After less extensive nuclease digestion, the protected DNA migrates in gels in lengths which are integral multiples of this 140 base pair "monomer" band. A submonomer band, 105 "/- 10 base pairs long, can also be detected. Similar digestion patterns were obtained by two different nuclear isolation procedures and even when intact cells were gently lysed directly in the digestion medium. These results confirm and extend the chromatin digestion studies of previous investigators and provide support for a subunit model for eukaryotic chromatin. The single strand specific S1 nuclease did not digest intranuclear chromatin under the conditions used.     

Electron microscopy of chromatin subunit particles

Electron microscope studies of PS-particles obtained by partial nuclease digestion of calf thymus chromatin shows them to be very similar in size and shape to particles which have been detected in native chromatin. Furthermore, measurement of the spacing between pairs of such particles, together with the known length of the DNA coiled in the particles gives an estimate of about 200 base pairs for the chromatin “subunit”.     

Nucleoprotein chromatin subunit from Physarum polycephalum

The nucleoproteins resulting from digestion of the nuclei of the true slime mold Pysarum polycephalum with micrococcal nuclease have been resolved according to the size classes in linear sucrose gradients containg 0.5 M NaCl, and analysed for DNA, RNA and protein content. The basic nucleoprotein subunit has been found to contain a DNA fragment of about 150--170 base pairs complexed with an approximately equal amount, on a weight basis, of basic proteins and a relatively small amount of non-histone proteins (about 35% of the amount of DNA). Higher nucleoprotein oligomers were shown to contain spacer DNA fragments between adjacent subunits and a considerably higher ratio of non-histone proteins to DNA than the basic subunit. Both the basic subunit and higher nucleoprotein oligomers of Physarum chromatin contain some amount of tightly bound RNA. However, in contrast to the distribution of the non-histone proteins, the ratio of RNA to RNA is similar in both fractions.     

Telomeric chromatin structure

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into nucleosomes, which further condenses into chromosomes. The telomeres, which form the protective end-capping of chromosomes, play a pivotal role in ageing and cancer. Recently, significant advances have been made in understanding the nucleosomal and telomeric chromatin structure at the molecular level. In addition, recent studies shed light on the nucleosomal organisation at telomeres revealing its ultrastructural organisation, the atomic structure at the nucleosome level, its dynamic properties, and higher-order packaging of telomeric chromatin. Considerable advances have furthermore been made in understanding the structure, function and organisation of shelterin, telomerase and CST complexes. Here we discuss these recent advances in the organisation of telomeric nucleosomes and chromatin and highlight progress in the structural understanding of shelterin, telomerase and CST complexes.     

Supranucleosomal structure of chromatin

Rat liver chromatin was moderately digested by micrococcal nuclease and analysed by centrifugation in isokinetic sucrose gradients and electron microscopy. Two classes of particles sedimenting with about 33S and 60S were characterized. Kinetics of their appearance and disappearance during progressive digestion suggests that they represent monomers and dimers cleaved from a higher order (supranucleosomal) structure of chromatin. Biochemical and electron microscopical results suggest that the monomers and dimers contain eight and sixteen nucleosomes, respectively, which are densely packed into 23 nm (monomer) and 29 nm (dimer) globules.     

Comparison of the subunit organization of early and late replicating chromatin

A comparison was made of the subunit organization of chromatin from regions of the genome with different metaphase chromosome banding characteristics by analyzing the accessibility of early and late replicating DNA in synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells to digestion with staphylococcal nuclease. Three measures of nuclease susceptibility were employed: (1) the release of acid-soluble material; (2) a digestion index, P, which corresponds to the proportion of internucleosome segments which experienced at least one cleavage event; and (3) the size distribution of DNA fragments isolated from digested chromatin. Little or no difference was observed in the initial rates with which nuclease converted early and late replicating chromatin to acid-soluble material, although the initial digestion rates varied with time of cell collection in the cycle (metaphase > G1 mid-S > late-S or G2). Measurements of the digestion indices of material isolated from interphase cells suggested that initial cleavage events were more rapid in early replicating chromatin than in late replicating chromatin. In contrast, electrophoretic analysis revealed that oligomer DNA fragments from early labelled metaphase chromatin were slightly larger than corresponding fragments from late labelled metaphase chromatin. The size distribution of DNA in submonomer fragments obtained from extensively digested chromatin appeared to be identical regardless of the timing of replication or cell collection. Those small differences in chromatin digestibility that were observed may reflect subtle variations in the accessibility of internucleosome regions or perhaps in the higher-order arrangement of nucleosomes. However, no gross variation in accessibility to staphylococcal nuclease digestion was observed in chromatin localized to metaphase chromosome regions with vastly different cytological staining properties.     

Low-angle neutron scattering from chromatin subunit particles.

Monomer chromatin particles containing 140 base pairs of DNA and eight histone molecules have been studied by neutron scattering. From measurements in various H2O/D2O mixtures, radii of gyration and the average scattering density of the particle were determined. The radius of gyration under conditions when scattering from the DNA dominates is 50A, and when scattering from the protein dominates, 30A. Consequently the core of the particle is largely occupied by the histones while the outer shell consists of DNA together with some of the histone.     

Kinases and chromatin structure

Chromatin structure is regulated by families of proteins that are able to covalently modify the histones and the DNA, as well as to regulate the spacing of nucleosomes along the DNA. Over the years, these chromatin remodeling factors have been proven to be essential to a variety of processes, including gene expression, DNA replication, and chromosome cohesion. The function of these remodeling factors is regulated by a number of chemical and developmental signals and, in turn, changes in the chromatin structure eventually contribute to the response to changes in the cellular environment. Exciting new research findings by the laboratories of Sharon Dent and Steve Jackson indicate, in two different contexts, that changes in the chromatin structure may, in reverse, signal to intracellular signaling pathways to regulate cell fate. The discoveries clearly challenge our traditional view of ‘epigenetics’, and may have important implications in human health.     

On the chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres

Telomeres prevent chromosome fusions and degradation by exonucleases and are implicated in DNA repair, homologous recombination, chromosome pairing and segregation. All these functions of telomeres require the integrity of their chromatin structure, which has been traditionally considered as heterochromatic. In agreement with this idea, different studies have reported that telomeres associate with heterochromatic marks. However, these studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or the chromatin structure of telomeres and Interstitial Telomeric Sequences (ITSs). The independent analysis of Arabidopsis telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs has allowed the discovery of euchromatic telomeres. In Arabidopsis, whereas subtelomeric regions and ITSs associate with heterochromatic marks, telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. We think that this scenario could be found in other model systems if the chromatin organizations of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed.Key words: telomeres, subtelomeres, euchromatin, heterochromatin, ChIP, immunolocalizationTelomeric DNA usually contains tandem repeats of a short GC rich motif. The number of repeats and, therefore, the length of telomeres is subject to regulation and influences relevant biological processes like aging and cancer.^1–3 In situ hybridization studies have revealed that telomeric repeats are also present at interstitial chromosomal loci.^4,5 An analysis of the genome sequence from different eukaryotes indicates that ITSs have a widespread distribution in different model systems including zebrafish, chicken, opossum, mouse, dog, cattle, horse, human, rice, poplar or Arabidopsis (see Fig. 1 for an example; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview). These ITSs have been related to chromosomal aberrations, fragile sites, hot spots for recombination and diseases caused by genomic instability, although their functions remain unknown.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of the main telomeric repeat arrays in the genome of several model organisms. These representations have been performed by using the megaBLAST program and the all assemblies genomic databases at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mapview). Searches for homology with 100 tandem telomeric repeats were done using the default parameters except that the expected threshold was set to 10 and the filters were turned off. Chromosomes are represented as vertical bars and numbered at the bottom. The horizontal bars represent the telomeric repeat arrays. Colors indicate the BLAST scores (red ≥200; pink 80–200; green 50–80).Telomeres and ITSs have probably cross talk through evolution. In some instances, ITSs could have been generated by telomeric fusions. Pioneering studies performed by Hermann J. Muller in Drosophila and Barbara McClintock in maize showed that newly formed chromosome ends tend to fuse giving rise to the so-called breakage-fusion-bridge cycle.^7,8 This cycle can lead to stable chromosomal reorganizations after healing of the broken ends. In addition, Muller and McClintock found that, unlike these newly formed broken chromosome ends, natural chromosomal ends are quite stable and do not tend to fuse.⁹ It is currently known that telomere dysfunction due to mutations that cause telomeric shortening or abolish the expression of certain telomeric proteins can lead to telomeric fusions, anaphase bridges and genome reorganizations.^1–3,10,11 Therefore, telomeric shortening or alterations of telomeric chromatin structure might be expected to generate ITSs through evolution by promoting telomeric fusions.¹² ITSs might also originate through the activity of telomerase during the repair process of double strand breaks or by recombination.^13–16 In addition, telomerase activity might lead to the formation of new telomeres by healing of chromosome breaks within internal telomeric repeats and even within other sequences.^17–19 This process of healing involves the acquisition of telomeric chromatin structure.DNA folds into two major chromatin organizations inside the cell nucleus: heterochromatin and euchromatin. Heterochromatin is highly condensed in interphase nuclei and is usually associated with repetitive and silent DNA. By contrast, euchromatin has an open conformation and is often related to the capacity to be transcribed. Both kinds of chromatin exhibit defined epigenetic modifications that influence their biochemical behavior. Thus, the study of these epigenetic marks is an issue of major interest.The chromatin structures of telomeres and ITSs might be different. Therefore, they should be studied independently. Chromatin structure analyses are usually performed by immunocytolocalization or by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).^20–23 Special care should be taken when the epigenetic status of telomeres is analyzed by immunocytolocalization. This technique does not allow differentiating between telomeres and subtelomeric regions. Since subtelomeric regions are known to be heterochromatic in many eukaryotic organisms, heterochromatic marks should be immunolocalized at the chromosome ends of these organisms. However, these marks could correspond to subtelomeric regions and not to telomeres.The ChIP technique implies the immunoprecipitation of chromatin with specific antibodies and the further analysis of the immunoprecipitated DNA. DNA sequences immunoprecipitated by a specific antibody are thought to associate in vivo with the feature recognized by this antibody. Whereas the enrichment of single copy sequences in the immunoprecipitated DNA has been usually analyzed by quantitative PCR, the analyses of repetitive DNA sequences have been often performed by hybridization. Thus, multiple telomeric chromatin structure analyses have been performed by hybridizing immunoprecipitated DNA with a telomeric probe. However, these analyses displayed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and ITSs. High throughput sequencing analyses of the immunoprecipitated DNA might help overcome this problem. Nevertheless, since the reads obtained with these techniques at present are short, it is still difficult to ascertain whether the enrichment of immunoprecipitated telomeric sequences corresponds to telomeres or to ITSs. Third-generation long-read accurate technologies and new algorithms that discriminate between telomeres and ITSs should solve the problem.In principle, the combination of immunocytolocalization and ChIP experiments should help to differentiate between telomeres and ITSs. However, since subtelomeric regions are known to influence telomere function and contain degenerated ITSs, at least in some organisms like humans or Arabidopsis, this may not be necessarily true.⁶ A specific epigenetic mark might be required for telomere function, found associated with telomeric repeats by ChIP and with the end of chromosomes by immunocytolocalization and still not associate with true telomeres but with subtelomeric regions and ITSs or just with subtelomeric ITSs.An alternative way to analyze the chromatin structure of telomeres by ChIP involves the use of frequently cutting restriction enzymes. The chromatin structures of Arabidopsis telomeres and ITSs have been independently studied by using Tru9I, a restriction enzyme that recognizes the sequence TTAA.²⁴ Since telomeres in Arabidopsis and in other model systems are composed of perfect telomeric repeat arrays, they remain uncut after digestion with Tru9I.²⁵ In contrast, Arabidopsis ITSs are frequently cut because they are composed of short arrays of perfect telomeric repeats interspersed with degenerated repeats.^25–28 Thus, when Arabidopsis genomic DNA is digested with Tru9I and hybridized with a telomeric probe, most of the signals corresponding to ITSs disappear.²⁵ The use of Tru9I has made possible to discover that Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. In contrast, Arabidopsis ITSs and subtelomeric regions are heterochromatic.²⁴ In Arabidopsis, heterochromatin is characterized by cytosine methylation, which can be targeted at CpG, CpNpG or CpNpN residues (where N is any nucleotide), and by H3K9me1,2, H3K27me1,2 and H4K20me1. In turn, Arabidopsis euchromatin is characterized by H3K4me1,2,3, H3K36me1,2,3, H4K20me2,3 and by histones acetylation.²⁹ ChIP experiments processed with Tru9I have revealed that Arabidopsis telomeres have high levels of euchromatic marks (H3K4me2, H3K9 and H4K16 acetylation) and low levels of heterochromatic marks (H3K9me2, H3K27me1 and DNA methylation).²⁴ Therefore, Arabidopsis telomeres exhibit epigenetic modifications characteristic of euchromatin.Different studies in mice, humans or Arabidopsis have reported that telomeres are heterochromatic based on the existence of siRNAs containing telomeric sequences, on the association of telomeric sequences with telomeric and with heterochromatin proteins, on the methylation of telomeric sequences or on the histones modifications associated with telomeric sequences.^30–34 However, the experiments presented in those studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin organizations of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or of telomeres and ITSs. Telomeres have also been reported to be heterochromatic based on the existence of the so-called TElomeric Repeat containing RNAs (TERRA), which are present in different eukaryotes.³⁵ At telomeric regions, TERRA are transcribed from subtelomeric promoters towards chromosome ends. Since human subtelomeric TERRA are mostly composed of subtelomeric sequences, with only about 200 bp of telomeric sequences at their 3′ ends, they might be related to subtelomeric heterochromatin formation rather than to the formation of telomeric chromatin. Nevertheless, TERRA interact with human telomeric proteins and influence telomere function. In addition, TERRA might also be related to ITSs heterochromatinization.^34,35We believe that the scenario found in Arabidopsis could also be found in other model systems if the chromatin structures of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed. Several reports have described the presence of histone H3.3 at mice telomeres.^36–39 Since this histone variant has been previously associated with active chromatin, these studies are compatible with a euchromatic organization of telomeres. However, again in these reports, the experiments shown addressed simultaneously the chromatin organization of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or of telomeres and ITSs. In general terms, we believe that a clear distinction between telomeres and ITSs should be established when future ChIP experiments are analyzed. The use of third generation high throughput sequencing technologies or of frequently cutting restriction enzymes might help in this task.As mentioned above, the epigenetic modifications associated with telomeric regions are known to be important for telomere function. These modifications are required to provide genome stability.³³ In this context, it will be relevant to ascertain how the function of Arabidopsis telomeres is influenced by their euchromatic marks and by the presence of heterochromatin at subtelomeric regions.     

Sequence-driven telomeric chromatin structure

An abstract is not available for this article.     

On the chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres

Telomeres prevent chromosome fusions and degradation by exonucleases and are implicated in DNA repair, homologous recombination, chromosome pairing and segregation. All these functions of telomeres require the integrity of their chromatin structure, which has been traditionally considered as heterochromatic. In agreement with this idea, different studies have reported that telomeres associate with heterochromatic marks. However, these studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or the chromatin structure of telomeres and Interstitial Telomeric Sequences (ITSs). The independent analysis of Arabidopsis telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs has allowed the discovery of euchromatic telomeres. In Arabidopsis, whereas subtelomeric regions and ITSs associate with heterochromatic marks, telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. We think that this scenario could be found in other model systems if the chromatin organizations of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed.