The Deubiquitinating Enzyme USP10 Regulates the Post-endocytic Sorting of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator in Airway Epithelial Cells

The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a member of the ABC transporter superfamily, is a cyclic AMP-regulated chloride channel and a regulator of other ion channels and transporters. In epithelial cells CFTR is rapidly endocytosed from the apical plasma membrane and efficiently recycles back to the plasma membrane. Because ubiquitination targets endocytosed CFTR for degradation in the lysosome, deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are likely to facilitate CFTR recycling. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify DUBs that regulate the post-endocytic sorting of CFTR. Using an activity-based chemical screen to identify active DUBs in human airway epithelial cells, we demonstrated that Ubiquitin Specific Protease-10 (USP10) is located in early endosomes and regulates the deubiquitination of CFTR and its trafficking in the post-endocytic compartment. small interference RNA-mediated knockdown of USP10 increased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and its degradation in lysosomes, and reduced both apical membrane CFTR and CFTR-mediated chloride secretion. Moreover, a dominant negative USP10 (USP10-C424A) increased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and its degradation, whereas overexpression of wt-USP10 decreased the amount of ubiquitinated CFTR and increased the abundance of CFTR. These studies demonstrate a novel function for USP10 in facilitating the deubiquitination of CFTR in early endosomes and thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR.The endocytosis, endocytic recycling, and endosomal sorting of numerous transport proteins and receptors are regulated by ubiquitination (1–6). Ubiquitin, an 8-kDa protein, is conjugated to target proteins via a series of steps that includes ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1),² ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3) (1). Proteins that are ubiquitinated in the plasma membrane are internalized and are either deubiquitinated and recycle back to the plasma membrane or, via interactions with the endosomal sorting complexes required for transport machinery, are delivered to the lysosome for degradation (1–7). Sorting of ubiquitinated plasma membrane proteins for either the lysosomal pathway or for the recycling pathway is regulated, in part, by the removal of ubiquitin by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) (1–6). Thus, the balance between ubiquitination and deubiquitination regulates the plasma membrane abundance of several membrane proteins, including the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), the epidermal growth factor receptor, the transforming growth factor-β receptor, and the cytokine receptor γ-c (8–14).CFTR is rapidly endocytosed from the plasma membrane and undergoes rapid and efficient recycling back to the plasma membrane in human airway epithelial cells, with >75% of endocytosed wild-type CFTR recycling back to the plasma membrane (15–18). A study published several years ago demonstrated that, although ubiquitination did not regulate CFTR endocytosis, ubiquitination reduced the plasma membrane abundance of CFTR in BHK cells by redirecting CFTR from recycling endosomes to lysosomes for degradation (19). However, neither the E3 ubiquitin ligase(s) responsible for the ubiquitination of CFTR nor the DUB(s) responsible for the deubiquitination of CFTR in the endocytic pathway have been identified in any cell type. Moreover, the effect of the ubiquitin status of CFTR on its endocytic sorting in human airway epithelial cells has not been reported. Thus, the goals of this study were to determine if the ubiquitin status regulates the post-endocytic sorting of CFTR in polarized airway epithelial cells, and to identify the DUBs that deubiquitinate CFTR.Approximately 100 DUBs have been identified in the human genome and are classified into five families based on sequence similarity and mechanism of action (1–6, 20, 21). To identify DUBs that regulate the deubiquitination of CFTR from this large class of enzymes, we chose an activity-based, chemical probe screening approach developed by Dr. Hidde Ploegh (4, 21, 22). This approach utilizes a hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ubiquitin probe engineered with a C-terminal modification incorporating a thiol-reactive group that forms an irreversible, covalent bond with active DUBs. Using this approach we demonstrated in polarized human airway epithelial cells that ubiquitin-specific protease-10 (USP10) is located in early endosomes and regulates the deubiquitination of CFTR and thus its trafficking in the post-endocytic compartment. These studies demonstrate a novel function for USP10 in promoting the deubiquitination of CFTR in early endosomes and thereby enhancing the endocytic recycling of CFTR.     

A Novel Strategy to Isolate Ubiquitin Conjugates Reveals Wide Role for Ubiquitination during Neural Development

Ubiquitination has essential roles in neuronal development and function. Ubiquitin proteomics studies on yeast and HeLa cells have proven very informative, but there still is a gap regarding neuronal tissue-specific ubiquitination. In an organism context, direct evidence for the ubiquitination of neuronal proteins is even scarcer. Here, we report a novel proteomics strategy based on the in vivo biotinylation of ubiquitin to isolate ubiquitin conjugates from the neurons of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. We confidently identified 48 neuronal ubiquitin substrates, none of which was yet known to be ubiquitinated. Earlier proteomics and biochemical studies in non-neuronal cell types had identified orthologs to some of those but not to others. The identification here of novel ubiquitin substrates, those with no known ubiquitinated ortholog, suggests that proteomics studies must be performed on neuronal cells to identify ubiquitination pathways not shared by other cell types. Importantly, several of those newly found neuronal ubiquitin substrates are key players in synaptogenesis. Mass spectrometry results were validated by Western blotting to confirm that those proteins are indeed ubiquitinated in the Drosophila embryonic nervous system and to elucidate whether they are mono- or polyubiquitinated. In addition to the ubiquitin substrates, we also identified the ubiquitin carriers that are active during synaptogenesis. Identifying endogenously ubiquitinated proteins in specific cell types, at specific developmental stages, and within the context of a living organism will allow understanding how the tissue-specific function of those proteins is regulated by the ubiquitin system.Posttranslational modification of proteins by ubiquitin is involved in a wide range of cellular processes (1). Ubiquitination is linked to the turnover of an ever growing number of proteins; it regulates protein trafficking and is also widely used to transiently facilitate protein-protein interactions (2, 3). As the number of known ubiquitinated proteins keeps growing, the focus is turning toward identifying when, where, and how those proteins are ubiquitinated in vivo with the aim of understanding how protein function is being regulated within the context of a whole organism. The ubiquitin pathway is essential for brain development and function, and its failure is associated with a number of neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases (4–6). Ubiquitin conjugation is carried out by the sequential action of ubiquitin-activating (E1), -conjugating (E2), and -ligating (E3) enzymes and can be reversed by deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB)1 proteases. The involvement of a number of those enzymes in synaptogenesis has been documented in several model systems (7–12). In Drosophila, for example, synaptogenesis is dependent on the E3 ligase Highwire and on the DUB fat facets (13). A few proteins involved in synaptogenesis have been shown to be ubiquitin substrates, including the postsynaptic proteins Shank, GKAP, and AKAP79/150 in cultured neurons (14) and the Caenorhabditis elegans synaptic protein DLK-1 kinase, which was shown to be ubiquitinated when overexpressed in HEK293T kidney cells (9). Most neuronal targets of the ubiquitin pathway, however, remain undiscovered. Yeast and HeLa cell-based proteomics approaches have failed to provide significant insights into the neuronal mechanisms regulated by ubiquitination. With the exception of a polyubiquitin affinity-based purification that successfully identified by Western blotting three ubiquitin substrates in cultured neurons (14), no proteomics approach has been described that can identify ubiquitinated neuronal proteins. Because neuronal function and activity are highly context-dependent, rather than working on neuronal culture, we have aimed to identify which proteins are ubiquitinated in vivo within the neurons of a living organism.Herein, we describe a novel strategy for the efficient isolation of neuronal ubiquitin conjugates from flies. The approach is based on the in vivo biotinylation of ubiquitin by ectopically expressing the Escherichia coli BirA enzyme to attach a biotin molecule to a specific BirA recognition sequence (15, 16) added at the N terminus of each ubiquitin chain. With the purpose of isolating ubiquitin conjugates uniquely from the nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster, we used the GAL4/UAS system for tissue-targeted expression (17). To increase the biotinylation efficiency, we took advantage of the processing activity of endogenous DUBs to digest a linear polypeptide precursor containing six copies of the tagged ubiquitin and the BirA enzyme, which are then present in the same cellular microenvironment. Because of the strength and the specificity of the avidin-biotin interaction, we were able to isolate and enrich the neuronal ubiquitinated proteins from a multicellular organism up to levels not achieved previously by any other approach. This allowed us to identify by mass spectrometry those neuronal proteins that are ubiquitinated and to resolve by Western blotting whether they are mono- or polyubiquitinated. This was achieved in the absence of proteasome inhibitors; therefore, physiological ubiquitination levels are reported. We focused on identifying the proteins that are ubiquitinated within the neurons in the period from neurite outgrowth and axonal pathfinding to target recognition and synapse formation (18). For that purpose, we applied our strategy on postmitotic neurons during embryonic stages 13–17 (19), a 12-h period during which embryos undergo synaptogenesis. Our strategy could be used to isolate ubiquitin conjugates from other tissues from the fruit flies, from different developmental stages, and in different mutant backgrounds, and it is likely to be applicable to other model organisms.     

Using in Vivo Biotinylated Ubiquitin to Describe a Mitotic Exit Ubiquitome from Human Cells

Mitotic division requires highly regulated morphological and biochemical changes to the cell. Upon commitment to exit mitosis, cells begin to remove mitotic regulators in a temporally and spatially controlled manner to bring about the changes that reestablish interphase. Ubiquitin-dependent pathways target these regulators to generate polyubiquitin-tagged substrates for degradation by the 26S proteasome. However, the lack of cell-based assays to investigate in vivo ubiquitination limits our knowledge of the identity of substrates of ubiquitin-mediated regulation in mitosis. Here we report an in vivo ubiquitin tagging system used in human cells that allows efficient purification of ubiquitin conjugates from synchronized cell populations. Coupling purification with mass spectrometry, we have identified a series of mitotic regulators targeted for polyubiquitination in mitotic exit. We show that some are new substrates of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and validate KIFC1 and RacGAP1/Cyk4 as two such targets involved respectively in timely mitotic spindle disassembly and cell spreading. We conclude that in vivo biotin tagging of ubiquitin can provide valuable information about the role of ubiquitin-mediated regulation in processes required for rebuilding interphase cells.Ubiquitination has emerged as a major post-translational modification determining the fate of cellular proteins. One of these fates is proteolysis, whereby the assembly of polyubiquitin chains creates signatures on target proteins that specify delivery to the 26S proteasome for proteolytic destruction. Targeted proteolysis is critical to the control of cell division. For example, the universally conserved mechanism of mitotic exit depends upon rapid proteolysis of mitotic cyclins and securins to drive the transition from mitosis to interphase. This transition is under surveillance by the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC),¹ which controls the activity of a multi-subunit ubiquitin ligase, the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) (1, 2).Much of the known specificity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is mediated at the level of substrate targeting by ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes, of which there are more than 600 in human cells. Given these facts, it is perhaps surprising that the APC/C is almost the only known engineer of the protein landscape after anaphase onset, targeting mitotic regulators for destruction with high temporal specificity (2–4). Some roles for nondegradative ubiquitination in regulating the localization of mitotic kinases Aurora B and Plk1 have been described (5–9), and a growing list of reported ubiquitin interactors can modulate ubiquitin-dependent events during mitosis (10). However, the majority of ubiquitination events that have so far been described as occurring at the transition from mitosis to interphase are APC/C-dependent.Two co-activator subunits, Cdc20 and Cdh1, play vital roles in APC/C-dependent substrate recognition (11) by recognizing two widely characterized degrons, the D-box and the KEN motif (12, 13). Computational approaches that have been used to calculate the total number of APC/C substrates from the prevalence of degrons in the human proteome estimate that there are between 100 and 200 substrates (14), and experiments using in vitro ubiquitination of protein arrays have given rise to estimates in the same range (15). Most of the mitotic regulators targeted by the APC/C during mitotic exit in human cells have been identified via in vitro degradation assays or ubiquitination assays on in vitro–expressed pools of substrates (15–18). These approaches have identified several important substrates, but in the absence of in vivo parameters they may not identify substrates whose targeting depends on post-translational modifications or substrates that are only recognized in vivo as components of higher-order complexes. Not all substrates identified in this way have been validated as polyubiquitinated proteins in vivo. Multiple recent proteomic studies have identified large numbers of in vivo ubiquitin-modified sites from yeast (19–21) and human cells (22–29). None of these studies have used synchronized cell populations to provide information on the timing or regulation of substrate ubiquitination.We reasoned that a better view of ubiquitin-mediated processes that regulate mitotic exit would come from identifying proteins that are ubiquitinated in vivo during mitotic exit. With this goal in mind we adopted a system for in vivo tagging of ubiquitin chains with biotin, previously used to identify ubiquitin-conjugated proteins from the Drosophila neural system (30), and applied it to a human cell line (U2OS) that can be tightly synchronized at mitosis. In contrast to several recent studies that employed antibodies specific to the diGly-Lys remnant that marks ubiquitination sites following trypsin digestion (19, 25), an in vivo ubiquitin tagging strategy allows direct validation of candidate ubiquitinated proteins (whether mono- or polyubiquitinated) through immunoblotting of samples. Moreover, in contrast to other methods for affinity tagging of ubiquitin, or affinity purification via ubiquitin-binding domains, the use of the biotin tag enables purification under highly denaturing conditions for stringent isolation of ubiquitin-conjugated material from higher eukaryotes. His₆-tagged ubiquitin is also available for use under denaturing conditions, but it is not generally useful in higher eukaryotic cells, where a high frequency of proteins containing multiple histidine residues confounds the specificity of nickel-affinity pulldowns (as discussed in detail in Ref. 30). Therefore, in this paper we describe the reproducible identification and validation of mitoticphase-specific polyubiquitinated proteins via the in vivo biotinylation of ubiquitin. A large number of polyubiquitinated proteins that we identified are specific to mitotic exit, when the APC/C is active, and we expect that many of them are substrates for the APC/C. We formally identified KIFC1/HSET and Cyk4/RACGAP1 as targets of APC/C-dependent ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis after anaphase onset and investigated the role of their ubiquitination in the regulation of mitotic exit. Cell cycle phase-specific information on protein ubiquitination and the generation of ubiquitinated protein networks provides a framework for further investigation of ubiquitin-controlled processes occurring during the rebuilding of interphase cells.     

Proteomic Analyses Reveal Divergent Ubiquitylation Site Patterns in Murine Tissues

Posttranslational modifications of proteins increase the complexity of the cellular proteome and enable rapid regulation of protein functions in response to environmental changes. Protein ubiquitylation is a central regulatory posttranslational modification that controls numerous biological processes including proteasomal degradation of proteins, DNA damage repair and innate immune responses. Here we combine high-resolution mass spectrometry with single-step immunoenrichment of di-glycine modified peptides for mapping of endogenous putative ubiquitylation sites in murine tissues. We identify more than 20,000 unique ubiquitylation sites on proteins involved in diverse biological processes. Our data reveals that ubiquitylation regulates core signaling pathways common for each of the studied tissues. In addition, we discover that ubiquitylation regulates tissue-specific signaling networks. Many tissue-specific ubiquitylation sites were obtained from brain highlighting the complexity and unique physiology of this organ. We further demonstrate that different di-glycine-lysine-specific monoclonal antibodies exhibit sequence preferences, and that their complementary use increases the depth of ubiquitylation site analysis, thereby providing a more unbiased view of protein ubiquitylation.Ubiquitin is a small 76-amino-acid protein that is conjugated to the ε-amino group of lysines in a highly orchestrated enzymatic cascade involving ubiquitin activating (E1), ubiquitin conjugating (E2), and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes (1). Ubiquitylation is involved in the regulation of diverse cellular processes including protein degradation (2, 3, 4), DNA damage repair (5, 6), DNA replication (7), cell surface receptor endocytosis, and innate immune signaling (8, 9). Deregulation of protein ubiquitylation is implicated in the development of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases (10, 11). Inhibitors targeting the ubiquitin proteasome system are used in the treatment of hematologic malignancies such as multiple myeloma (12, 13).Recent developments in the mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics have greatly expedited proteome-wide analysis of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) (14–17). Large-scale mapping of ubiquitylation sites by mass spectrometry is based on the identification of the di-glycine remnant that results from trypsin digestion of ubiquitylated proteins and remains attached to ubiquitylated lysines (18). Recently, two monoclonal antibodies were developed that specifically recognize di-glycine remnant modified peptides enabling their efficient enrichment from complex peptide mixtures (19, 20). These antibodies have been used to identify thousands of endogenous ubiquitylation sites in human cells, and to quantify site-specific changes in ubiquitylation in response to different cellular perturbations (20–22). It should be noted that the di-glycine remnant is not specific for proteins modified by ubiquitin but also proteins modified by NEDD8 or ISG15 generate an identical di-glycine remnant on modified lysines making it impossible to distinguish between these modifications by mass spectrometry. However, expression of NEDD8 in mouse tissues was shown to be developmentally down-regulated (23), and ISG15 expression in bovine tissues is low in the absence of interferon stimulation (24). In cell culture experiments it was shown that a great majority of sites identified using di-glycine-lysine-specific antibodies stems from ubiquitylated peptides (20).The rates of cell proliferation and protein turnover in mammals vary dramatically between different tissues. Immortalized cell lines, often derived from cancer, are selected for high proliferation rates and fail to represent the complex conditions in tissues. Tissue proteomics can help to gain a more comprehensive understanding of physiological processes in multicellular organisms. Analysis of tissue proteome and PTMs can provide important insights into tissue-specific processes and signaling networks that regulate these processes (25–32). In addition, development of mass spectrometric methods for analysis of PTMs in diseased tissues might lead to the identification of biomarkers.In this study, we combined high-resolution mass spectrometry with immunoenrichment of di-glycine modified peptides to investigate endogenous ubiquitylation sites in murine tissues. We identified more than 20,000 ubiquitylation sites from five different murine tissues and report the largest ubiquitylation dataset obtained from mammalian tissues to date. Furthermore, we compared the performance of the two monoclonal di-glycine-lysine-specific antibodies available for enrichment of ubiquitylated peptides, and reveal their relative preferences for different amino acids flanking ubiquitylation sites.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Printor, a Novel TorsinA-interacting Protein Implicated in Dystonia Pathogenesis

Early onset generalized dystonia (DYT1) is an autosomal dominant neurological disorder caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue (torsinA ΔE) in the C-terminal region of the AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) protein torsinA. The pathogenic mechanism by which torsinA ΔE mutation leads to dystonia remains unknown. Here we report the identification and characterization of a 628-amino acid novel protein, printor, that interacts with torsinA. Printor co-distributes with torsinA in multiple brain regions and co-localizes with torsinA in the endoplasmic reticulum. Interestingly, printor selectively binds to the ATP-free form but not to the ATP-bound form of torsinA, supporting a role for printor as a cofactor rather than a substrate of torsinA. The interaction of printor with torsinA is completely abolished by the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutation. Our findings suggest that printor is a new component of the DYT1 pathogenic pathway and provide a potential molecular target for therapeutic intervention in dystonia.Early onset generalized torsion dystonia (DYT1) is the most common and severe form of hereditary dystonia, a movement disorder characterized by involuntary movements and sustained muscle spasms (1). This autosomal dominant disease has childhood onset and its dystonic symptoms are thought to result from neuronal dysfunction rather than neurodegeneration (2, 3). Most DYT1 cases are caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue at positions 302 or 303 (torsinA ΔE) of the 332-amino acid protein torsinA (4). In addition, a different torsinA mutation that deletes amino acids Phe³²³–Tyr³²⁸ (torsinA Δ323–328) was identified in a single family with dystonia (5), although the pathogenic significance of this torsinA mutation is unclear because these patients contain a concomitant mutation in another dystonia-related protein, ϵ-sarcoglycan (6). Recently, genetic association studies have implicated polymorphisms in the torsinA gene as a genetic risk factor in the development of adult-onset idiopathic dystonia (7, 8).TorsinA contains an N-terminal endoplasmic reticulum (ER)³ signal sequence and a 20-amino acid hydrophobic region followed by a conserved AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) domain (9, 10). Because members of the AAA⁺ family are known to facilitate conformational changes in target proteins (11, 12), it has been proposed that torsinA may function as a molecular chaperone (13, 14). TorsinA is widely expressed in brain and multiple other tissues (15) and is primarily associated with the ER and nuclear envelope (NE) compartments in cells (16–20). TorsinA is believed to mainly reside in the lumen of the ER and NE (17–19) and has been shown to bind lamina-associated polypeptide 1 (LAP1) (21), lumenal domain-like LAP1 (LULL1) (21), and nesprins (22). In addition, recent evidence indicates that a significant pool of torsinA exhibits a topology in which the AAA⁺ domain faces the cytoplasm (20). In support of this topology, torsinA is found in the cytoplasm, neuronal processes, and synaptic terminals (2, 3, 15, 23–26) and has been shown to bind cytosolic proteins snapin (27) and kinesin light chain 1 (20). TorsinA has been proposed to play a role in several cellular processes, including dopaminergic neurotransmission (28–31), NE organization and dynamics (17, 22, 32), and protein trafficking (27, 33). However, the precise biological function of torsinA and its regulation remain unknown.To gain insights into torsinA function, we performed yeast two-hybrid screens to search for torsinA-interacting proteins in the brain. We report here the isolation and characterization of a novel protein named printor (protein interactor of torsinA) that interacts selectively with wild-type (WT) torsinA but not the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutant. Our data suggest that printor may serve as a cofactor of torsinA and provide a new molecular target for understanding and treating dystonia.     

Ubiquitination Regulates Proteolytic Processing of G Protein-coupled Receptors after Their Sorting to Lysosomes

Ubiquitination is essential for the endocytic sorting of various G protein-coupled receptors to lysosomes. Here we identify a distinct function of this covalent modification in controlling the later proteolytic processing of receptors. Mutation of all cytoplasmic lysine residues in the murine δ-opioid receptor blocked receptor ubiquitination without preventing ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors or their subsequent delivery to lysosomes, as verified by proteolysis of extramembrane epitope tags and down-regulation of radioligand binding to the transmembrane helices. Surprisingly, a functional screen revealed that the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4 specifically controls down-regulation of wild type receptors measured by radioligand binding without detectably affecting receptor delivery to lysosomes defined both immunochemically and biochemically. This specific AIP4-dependent regulation required direct ubiquitination of receptors and was also regulated by two deubiquitinating enzymes, AMSH and UBPY, which localized to late endosome/lysosome membranes containing internalized δ-opioid receptor. These results identify a distinct function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in controlling the later proteolytic processing of G protein-coupled receptors, without detectably affecting their endocytic sorting to lysosomes. We propose that ubiquitination or ubiquitination/deubiquitination cycling specifically regulates later proteolytic processing events required for destruction of the receptor''s hydrophobic core.A fundamental cellular mechanism contributing to homeostatic regulation of receptor-mediated signal transduction involves ligand-induced endocytosis of receptors followed by proteolysis in lysosomes. The importance of such proteolytic down-regulation has been documented extensively for a number of seven-transmembrane or G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),³ which comprise the largest known family of signaling receptors expressed in animals, as well as for other important signaling receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (1–5).One GPCR that is well known to undergo endocytic trafficking to lysosomes is the δ-opioid peptide receptor (DOR or DOP-R) (6). Following endocytosis, DOR traffics efficiently to lysosomes in both neural and heterologous cell models (6–8), whereas many membrane proteins, including various GPCRs, recycle rapidly to the plasma membrane (9–12). Such molecular sorting of internalized receptors between divergent recycling and degradative pathways is thought to play a fundamental role in determining the functional consequences of regulated endocytosis (2, 3, 13, 14). The sorting process that directs internalized DOR to lysosomes is remarkably efficient and appears to occur rapidly (within several min) after receptor endocytosis (11). Nevertheless, biochemical mechanisms that control lysosomal trafficking and proteolysis of DOR remain poorly understood.A conserved mechanism that promotes lysosomal trafficking of a number of membrane proteins, including various signaling receptors, is mediated by covalent modification of cytoplasmic lysine residues with ubiquitin (4, 15–17). Ubiquitination was first identified as an endocytic sorting determinant in studies of vacuolar trafficking of the yeast GPCR Ste2p (18). Subsequent studies have established numerous examples of lysyl-ubiquitination being required for sorting endocytic cargo to lysosomes and have identified conserved machinery responsible for the targeting of ubiquitinated cargo to lysosomes (3, 17, 19–22).The CXCR4 chemokine receptor provides a clear example of ubiquitin-dependent lysosomal sorting of a mammalian GPCR. Ubiquitination of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the CXCR4 receptor, mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4, is specifically required for the HRS- and VPS4-dependent trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes. Blocking this ubiquitination event by Lys → Arg mutation of the receptor specifically inhibits trafficking of internalized receptors to lysosomes, resulting in recycling rather than lysosomal proteolysis of receptors after ligand-induced endocytosis (23–25).Lysosomal trafficking of DOR, in contrast, is not prevented by mutation of cytoplasmic lysine residues (26) and can be regulated by ubiquitination-independent protein interaction(s) (27, 28). Nevertheless, both wild type and lysyl-mutant DORs traffic to lysosomes via a similar pathway as ubiquitin-dependent membrane cargo and require both HRS and active VPS4 to do so (29). These observations indicate that DOR engages the same core endocytic mechanism utilized by ubiquitination-directed membrane cargo but leave unresolved whether ubiquitination of DOR plays any role in this important cellular mechanism of receptor down-regulation.There is no doubt that DOR can undergo significant ubiquitination in mammalian cells, including HEK293 cells (30–32), where lysosomal trafficking of lysyl-mutant receptors was first observed (26). Ubiquitination was shown previously to promote proteolysis of DOR by proteasomes and to function in degrading misfolded receptors from the biosynthetic pathway (30, 31). A specific role of ubiquitination in promoting proteasome- but not lysosome-mediated proteolysis of DOR has been emphasized (32) and proposed to contribute to proteolytic down-regulation of receptors also from the plasma membrane (33).To our knowledge, no previous studies have determined if DOR ubiquitination plays any role in controlling receptor proteolysis mediated by lysosomes, although this represents a predominant pathway by which receptors undergo rapid down-regulation following ligand-induced endocytosis in a number of cell types, including HEK293 cells (8). In the present study, we have taken two approaches to addressing this fundamental question. First, we have investigated in greater detail the effects of lysyl-mutation on DOR ubiquitination and trafficking. Second, we have independently investigated the role of ubiquitination in controlling lysosomal proteolysis of wild type DOR. Our results clearly establish the ability of DOR to traffic efficiently to lysosomes in the absence of any detectable ubiquitination. Further, they identify a distinct and unanticipated function of AIP4-dependent ubiquitination in regulating the later proteolytic processing of receptors and show that this distinct ubiquitin-dependent regulatory mechanism operates effectively downstream of the sorting decision that commits internalized receptors for delivery to lysosomes.     

A Label-free Quantitative Proteomics Strategy to Identify E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrates Targeted to Proteasome Degradation

The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a central mechanism for controlled proteolysis that regulates numerous cellular processes in eukaryotes. As such, defects in this system can contribute to disease pathogenesis. In this pathway, E3 ubiquitin ligases provide platforms for binding specific substrates, thereby coordinating their ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation by the proteasome. Despite the identification of many E3 ubiquitin ligases, the identities of their specific substrates are still largely unresolved. The ankyrin repeat-containing protein with a suppressor of cytokine signaling box 2 (ASB2) gene that we initially identified as a retinoic acid-response gene in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells encodes the specificity subunit of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that is involved in hematopoietic cell differentiation. We have recently identified filamin A and filamin B as the first ASB2 targets and shown that ASB2 triggers ubiquitylation and proteasome-mediated degradation of these proteins. Here a global quantitative proteomics strategy is provided to identify substrates of E3 ubiquitin ligases targeted to proteasomal degradation. Indeed we used label-free methods for quantifying proteins identified by shotgun proteomics in extracts of cells expressing wild-type ASB2 or an E3 ubiquitin ligase-defective mutant of ASB2 under the control of an inducible promoter. Measurements of spectral count and mass spectrometric signal intensity demonstrated a drastic decrease of filamin A and filamin B in myeloid leukemia cells expressing wild-type ASB2 compared with cells expressing an E3 ubiquitin ligase-defective mutant of ASB2. Altogether we provide an original strategy that enables identification of E3 ubiquitin ligase substrates that have to be degraded.The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS)¹ plays an essential role in the regulation of protein stability in eukaryotic cells. Degradation of a protein by the UPS entails two successive steps: the covalent attachment of multiple ubiquitin molecules to the protein substrate and its degradation by the 26 S proteasome (1, 2). Ubiquitylation of protein substrates occurs through the sequential action of distinct enzymes: a ubiquitin-activating enzyme, E1; a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, E2; and a ubiquitin ligase, E3, responsible for the specific recognition of substrates. Increasing attention has been recently given to the UPS leading to the identification of hundreds of E3 ubiquitin ligases (E3s). Two major classes of E3s have been described: (i) E3s of the HECT (homologous to the E6-associated protein carboxyl terminus) domain family that function as ubiquitin carriers (3, 4) and (ii) E3s of the RING (really interesting new gene) or of the U box families that have no inherent catalytic activity but recruit an E2 enzyme toward substrates (5–7).Classical approaches to identify substrates of E3s are based on the identification of interacting proteins. Although these have successfully led to the identification of a number of substrates of monomeric E3s, identification of substrates of multimeric E3s is very challenging because of the weak affinity of substrates for their requisite specificity subunit and because of the labile nature of the substrate complexed with the specificity subunit (8).Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is associated with six reciprocal translocations always involving the retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) gene (9–11). The RARα protein is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily that stimulates myeloid differentiation in the presence of its ligand, all-trans-retinoic acid (RA). In more than 95% of APL, the t(15;17) translocation between the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene on chromosome 15 and the RARα gene on chromosome 17 produces the PML-RARα fusion protein (12). The PML-RARα protein enhances the repression of RARα target genes by increasing associations with corepressors (13–15) and by recruiting DNA methyltransferases (16). These complexes dissociate from the PML-RARα fusion protein in the presence of pharmacological concentrations of RA perhaps explaining why APL cells are sensitive to RA treatment. Indeed at pharmacological concentrations, RA induces complete remission in a high percentage of APL patients (17–19). By studying RA-induced differentiation of APL cells we have attempted to identify some of the genes that may be up-regulated during this process to further understand the control of growth and differentiation in leukemia (20). One gene identified in this manner, ASB2 (ankyrin repeat-containing protein with a suppressor of cytokine signaling box 2) is an RA-response gene involved in induced differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells (21–23).The ASB2 protein is a subunit of a multimeric E3 ubiquitin ligase of the cullin-RING ligase family (24, 25). The ASB2 suppressor of cytokine signaling box can be divided into a BC box that defines a binding site for the Elongin BC complex and a Cul5 box that determines the binding specificity for Cullin5 (24, 26). Indeed the ASB2 protein, by interacting with the Elongin BC complex, can assemble with a Cullin5/Rbx1 or -2 module to reconstitute an active E3 ubiquitin ligase complex (23–25). Within this complex, the ASB2 protein is the specificity subunit involved in the recruitment of specific substrate(s). Furthermore endogenous ASB2 protein was copurified with ubiquitin ligase activity in RA-treated APL cells suggesting that, during induced differentiation of leukemia cells, the ASB2 protein may target proteins involved in blocking differentiation to destruction by the proteasome machinery (24). We recently identified actin-binding proteins filamin A (FLNa) and filamin B (FLNb) as ASB2 targets and showed that ASB2 triggers ubiquitylation and drives proteasome-mediated degradation of these proteins during RA-induced differentiation of myeloid leukemia cells (23).With the aim to develop a strategy to identify E3 substrates that are degraded by the proteasome, we used an MS approach to identify ASB2 substrates in physiologically relevant settings. Indeed we used label-free quantitative proteomics to identify proteins that are absent or less abundant in cells that express wild-type ASB2 but that accumulate in cells expressing an ASB2 E3 ligase-defective mutant. Application of label-free MS methods that have the advantage to be simple, fast, and cheap enabled the identification of FLNa and FLNb as ASB2 substrates. This study provides a new strategy for the identification of E3 substrates that have to be degraded.     

Occludin Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Regulate Tight Junction Trafficking and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-induced Permeability

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) alters tight junctions (TJs) and promotes vascular permeability in many retinal and brain diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms of barrier regulation are poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that occludin phosphorylation and ubiquitination regulate VEGF-induced TJ protein trafficking and concomitant vascular permeability. VEGF treatment induced TJ fragmentation and occludin trafficking from the cell border to early and late endosomes, concomitant with increased occludin phosphorylation on Ser-490 and ubiquitination. Furthermore, both co-immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry demonstrated that VEGF treatment increased the interaction between occludin and modulators of intracellular trafficking that contain the ubiquitin interacting motif, including Epsin-1, epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 15 (Eps15), and hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (Hrs). Inhibiting occludin phosphorylation by mutating Ser-490 to Ala suppressed VEGF-induced ubiquitination, inhibited trafficking of TJ proteins, and prevented the increase in endothelial permeability. In addition, an occludin-ubiquitin chimera disrupted TJs and increased permeability without VEGF. These data demonstrate a novel mechanism of VEGF-induced occludin phosphorylation and ubiquitination that contributes to TJ trafficking and subsequent vascular permeability.Under normal physiological conditions the blood-brain barrier and blood-retinal barrier regulate the transport of water, ions, amino acids, and waste products, between the neural parenchyma and blood (1). A high degree of well developed tight junctions (TJs)² in the vascular endothelium, in association with adherens junctions, contribute to both the blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers (2). Accumulating evidence suggests that a number of pathological eye diseases such as diabetes, retinopathy of prematurity, age-related macular degeneration, inflammation, and infectious diseases disrupt the TJs altering the blood-retinal barrier. Common mediators of vascular permeability and TJ deregulation are growth factors and cytokines that may induce macular edema and lead to loss of vision (1). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in particular, induces vascular permeability and stimulates angiogenesis, contributing to disease pathogenesis in diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity (3). VEGF also contributes to blood-brain barrier disruption with subsequent edema and angiogenesis in brain tumors and stroke (4). Recent advances in biomedical research have provided therapeutic approaches to neutralize VEGF; however, these strategies have not yet demonstrated effective resolution of diabetic macular edema (5, 6).TJs control the paracellular flux of solutes and fluids across the blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers. Several transmembrane proteins including occludin, tricellulin, the claudin family, and junction adhesion molecules are thought to confer adhesion to the TJ barrier and to be organized by members of the zonula occludens family (ZO-1, -2, or -3) (7–9). Experimental evidence has established that the claudins confer barrier properties and claudin-5 specifically contributes to the vascular component of the blood-brain barrier demonstrated by gene deletion studies (10). In contrast, the function of occludin in paracellular flux has remained less clear. Mice with occludin gene deletion continue to form TJs in gut epithelia with normal barrier properties (11). However, studies have also demonstrated that diabetes reduces occludin content in rat retina (12) and alters its distribution from continuous cell border localization to intracellular puncta (13). These observations suggest that the intracellular trafficking of TJ proteins promotes paracellular flux and vascular permeability in diabetic animals (12, 14).VEGF was originally identified as a vascular permeability factor as well as a pro-angiogenic growth factor (15, 16). Both biological effects exacerbate the pathology of retinal vascular diseases (17), and they are mediated via intracellular signal transduction, especially based on the phosphorylation of Src, protein kinase C, and so on (18). Additionally, VEGF treatment and diabetes induce occludin phosphorylation in rat retinal vasculature and endothelial cell culture coincident with increased permeability (19). Recently, using mass spectrometry five occludin phosphorylation sites were identified in retinal endothelial cell culture after VEGF treatment (20). Among these sites, phosphorylation at Ser-490 was shown to increase in response to VEGF treatment. However, no evidence has directly demonstrated the contribution of occludin phosphorylation to VEGF-induced endothelial permeability or defined the mechanism by which phosphorylation of occludin alters paracellular flux.Modification of proteins with monomeric or polymeric ubiquitin chains contributes to control of multiple biological functions including protein degradation, intracellular trafficking, translational regulation, and DNA repair (21). Phosphorylation of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as epidermal growth factor receptor or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, is followed by ubiquitination and regulated trafficking to endosomes. This endocytosis process depends on the interaction between the ubiquitinated receptors and carrier proteins that possess a ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) such as Epsin, epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 15 (Eps15), and hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (Hrs) (21–24). Recent publications have demonstrated that occludin can be ubiquitinated targeting the protein for degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system in epithelial cell types (25, 26). Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of occludin at Ser-490 is necessary for occludin ubiquitination in response to VEGF in endothelial cells. Furthermore, the ubiquitination promotes interaction of occludin with UIM containing modulators of trafficking and regulates the internalization of TJ proteins altering endothelial permeability. Together, these results suggest that occludin phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination are necessary for VEGF-induced TJ trafficking and endothelial permeability.     

CD4 Glycoprotein Degradation Induced by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpu Protein Requires the Function of Proteasomes and the Ubiquitin-Conjugating Pathway

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vpu gene encodes a type I anchored integral membrane phosphoprotein with two independent functions. First, it regulates virus release from a post-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartment by an ion channel activity mediated by its transmembrane anchor. Second, it induces the selective down regulation of host cell receptor proteins (CD4 and major histocompatibility complex class I molecules) in a process involving its phosphorylated cytoplasmic tail. In the present work, we show that the Vpu-induced proteolysis of nascent CD4 can be completely blocked by peptide aldehydes that act as competitive inhibitors of proteasome function and also by lactacystin, which blocks proteasome activity by covalently binding to the catalytic β subunits of proteasomes. The sensitivity of Vpu-induced CD4 degradation to proteasome inhibitors paralleled the inhibition of proteasome degradation of a model ubiquitinated substrate. Characterization of CD4-associated oligosaccharides indicated that CD4 rescued from Vpu-induced degradation by proteasome inhibitors is exported from the ER to the Golgi complex. This finding suggests that retranslocation of CD4 from the ER to the cytosol may be coupled to its proteasomal degradation. CD4 degradation mediated by Vpu does not require the ER chaperone calnexin and is dependent on an intact ubiquitin-conjugating system. This was demonstrated by inhibition of CD4 degradation (i) in cells expressing a thermally inactivated form of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E₁ or (ii) following expression of a mutant form of ubiquitin (Lys₄₈ mutated to Arg₄₈) known to compromise ubiquitin targeting by interfering with the formation of polyubiquitin complexes. CD4 degradation was also prevented by altering the four Lys residues in its cytosolic domain to Arg, suggesting a role for ubiquitination of one or more of these residues in the process of degradation. The results clearly demonstrate a role for the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the process of Vpu-induced CD4 degradation. In contrast to other viral proteins (human cytomegalovirus US2 and US11), however, whose translocation of host ER molecules into the cytosol occurs in the presence of proteasome inhibitors, Vpu-targeted CD4 remains in the ER in a transport-competent form when proteasome activity is blocked.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific accessory protein Vpu performs two distinct functions in the viral life cycle (11, 12, 29, 34, 46, 47, 50–52; reviewed in references 31 and 55): enhancement of virus particle release from the cell surface, and the selective induction of proteolysis of newly synthesized membrane proteins. Known targets for Vpu include the primary virus receptor CD4 (63, 64) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (28). Vpu is an oligomeric class I integral membrane phosphoprotein (35, 48, 49) with a structurally and functionally defined domain architecture: an N-terminal transmembrane anchor and C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (20, 34, 45, 47, 50, 65). Vpu-induced degradation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane proteins involves the phosphorylated cytoplasmic tail of the protein (50), whereas the virion release function is mediated by a cation-selective ion channel activity associated with the membrane anchor (19, 31, 45, 47).CD4 is a 55-kDa class I integral membrane glycoprotein that serves as the primary coreceptor for HIV entry into cells. CD4 consists of a large lumenal domain, a transmembrane peptide, and a 38-residue cytoplasmic tail. It is expressed on the surface of a subset of T lymphocytes that recognize MHC class II-associated peptides, and it plays a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of the immune system (reviewed in reference 30). Down regulation of CD4 in HIV-1-infected cells is mediated through several independent mechanisms (reviewed in references 5 and 55): intracellular complex formation of CD4 with the HIV envelope protein gp160 (8, 14), endocytosis of cell surface CD4 induced by the HIV-1 nef gene product (1, 2), and ER degradation induced by the HIV-1 vpu gene product (63, 64).Vpu-induced degradation of CD4 is an example of ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). ERAD is a common outcome when proteins in the secretory pathway are unable to acquire their native structure (4). Although it was thought that ERAD occurs exclusively inside membrane vesicles of the ER or other related secretory compartments, this has gained little direct experimental support. Indeed, there are several recent reports that ERAD may actually represent export of the target protein to the cytosol, where it is degraded by cytosolic proteases. It was found that in yeast, a secreted protein, prepro-α-factor (pαF), is exported from microsomes and degraded in the cytosol in a proteasome-dependent manner (36). This process was dependent on the presence of calnexin, an ER-resident molecular chaperone that interacts with N-linked oligosaccharides containing terminal glucose residues (3). In mammalian cells, two human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) proteins, US2 and US11, were found to cause the retranslocation of MHC class I molecules from the ER to the cytosol, where they are destroyed by proteasomes (61, 62). In the case of US2, class I molecules were found to associate with a protein (Sec61) present in the channel normally used to translocate newly synthesized proteins into the ER (termed the translocon), leading to the suggestion that the ERAD substrates are delivered to the cytosol by retrograde transport through the Sec61-containing pore (61). Fujita et al. (24) reported that, similar to these findings, the proteasome-specific inhibitor lactacystin (LC) partially blocked CD4 degradation in transfected HeLa cells coexpressing CD4, Vpu, and HIV-1 Env glycoproteins. In the present study, we show that Vpu-induced CD4 degradation can be completely blocked by proteasome inhibitors, does not require the ER chaperone calnexin, but requires the function of the cytosolic polyubiquitination machinery which apparently targets potential ubiquitination sites within the CD4 cytoplasmic tail. Our findings point to differences between the mechanism of Vpu-mediated CD4 degradation and ERAD processes induced by the HCMV proteins US2 and US11 (61, 62).