Timing of GH Peak in Both Glucagon and Clonidine Tests is of Major Clinical Importance

Objective: To detect a possible correlation between timing of the peak value of growth hormone (GH) during stimulatory tests (STs) and the effectiveness of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in children with idiopathic GH deficiency (iGHD).Methods: We retrospectively studied 92 patients with iGHD (57 boys; mean age at diagnosis: 9.93 years). Diagnosis was confirmed by 2 different STs, glucagon stimulation test (GST), and clonidine stimulation test (CST). Auxologic parameters were recorded, while observed and predicted (according to KIGS Prediction Model) height velocity during the first year of treatment and the index of responsiveness (IoR) were calculated for the prepubertal children (n = 65).Results: Atypical GST was defined as that with peak GH value at time 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, or 180 minutes, whereas atypical CST was defined as that with peak timing at 0 minutes, 30 minutes, or 120 minutes. Atypical GST was detected in 18 patients (19.57%). IoR was lower in the prepubertal children with atypical GST (-1.81 ± 0.67 versus -1.34 ± 0.85; P = .051). In the CST, the 18 children who had atypical timing, had significantly lower IoR (-1.86 ± 0.66 versus -1.35 ± 0.84; P = .047). When the patients were categorized according to the number of atypical tests, significant differences in the IoR were detected (-2.09 ± 0.68 with 2 atypical STs [n = 6], -1.64 ± 0.61 with 1 atypical ST [n = 16], and -1.29 ± 0.87 with no atypical ST [n = 43], P = .045).Conclusion: The presence of atypical peak GH timing during ST may be a factor that predicts lower growth hormone velocity during the first year of rhGH treatment in prepubertal children with iGHD.Abbreviations: CST = clonidine stimulation test; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GST = glucagon stimulation test; iGHD = idiopathic growth hormone deficiency; IoR = index of responsiveness; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; SDS = standard deviation scores; ST = stimulatory test     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review: Update on Growth Hormone Stimulation Testing and Proposed Revised Cut-Point for the Glucagon Stimulation Test in the Diagnosis Of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

Objective: The clinical features of adult GH deficiency (GHD) are nonspecific, and GH stimulation testing is often required to confirm the diagnosis. However, diagnosing adult GHD can be challenging due to the episodic and pulsatile GH secretion, concurrently modified by age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).Methods: PubMed searches were conducted to identify published data since 2009 on GH stimulation tests used to diagnose adult GHD. Relevant articles in English language were identified and considered for inclusion in the present document.Results: Testing for confirmation of adult GHD should only be considered if there is a high pretest probability, and the intent to treat if the diagnosis is confirmed. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) are the two main tests used in the United States. While the ITT has been accepted as the gold-standard test, its safety concerns hamper wider use. Previously, the GH–releasing hormone-arginine test, and more recently the GST, are accepted alternatives to the ITT. However, several recent studies have questioned the diagnostic accuracy of the GST when the GH cut-point of 3 μg/L is used and have suggested that a lower GH cut-point of 1 μg/L improved the sensitivity and specificity of this test in overweight/obese patients and in those with glucose intolerance.Conclusion: Until a potent, safe, and reliable test becomes available, the GST should remain as the alternative to the ITT in the United States. In order to reduce over-diagnosing adult GHD in overweight/obese patients with the GST, we propose utilizing a lower GH cut-point of 1 μg/L in these subjects. However, this lower GH cut-point still needs further evaluation for diagnostic accuracy in larger patient populations with varying BMIs and degrees of glucose tolerance.Abbreviations:AACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsBMI = body mass indexGH = growth hormoneGHD = GH deficiencyGHRH = GH–releasing hormoneGHS = GH secretagogueGST = glucagon stimulation testIGF = insulin-like growth factorIGFBP-3 = IGF-binding protein 3ITT = insulin tolerance testROC = receiver operating characteristicWB-GST = weight-based GST     

Diagnosing Growth Hormone Deficiency: Can a Combined Arginine and Clonidine Stimulation Test Replace 2 Separate Tests?

ObjectiveGiven the large number of false-positive growth hormone deficiency (GHD) diagnoses from a single growth hormone (GH) stimulation test in children, 2 different pharmacologic tests, performed on separate days or sequentially, are required. This study aimed to assess the reliability and safety of a combined arginine-clonidine stimulation test (CACST).MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. During 2017-2019, 515 children aged >8 years underwent GH stimulation tests (CACST: n = 362 or clonidine stimulation test [CST]: n = 153). The main outcome measures used to compare the tests were GH response (sufficiency/deficiency) and amplitude and timing of peak GH and safety parameters.ResultsPopulation characteristics were as follows: median age of 12.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.7, 13.4), 331 boys (64%), and 282 prepubertal children (54.8%). The GHD rate was comparable with 12.7% for CACST and 14.4% for CST followed by a confirmatory test (glucagon or arginine) (P = .609). Peak GH was higher and occurred later in response to CACST compared with CST (14.6 ng/mL [IQR: 10.6, 19.4] vs 11.4 ng/mL [IQR: 7.0, 15.8], respectively, P < .001; 90 minutes [IQR: 60, 90] vs 60 minutes [IQR: 60, 90], respectively, P < .001). No serious adverse events occurred following CACST.ConclusionOur findings demonstrate the reliability and safety of CACST in detecting GHD in late childhood and adolescence, suggesting that it may replace separate or sequential GH stimulation tests. By diminishing the need for the second GH stimulation test, CACST saves time, is more cost-effective, and reduces discomfort for children, caregivers, and medical staff.     

Serum Free Cortisol During Glucagon Stimulation Test In Healthy Short-Statured Children And Adolescents

Objective: The total cortisol (TC) response may be measured during the glucagon stimulation test (GST) for growth hormone (GH) reserve in order to assess the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Measurements of TC are unreliable in conditions of albumin and cortisol-binding globulin (CBG) alterations (e.g., hypoproteinemia or CBG deficiency). We aimed to measure the serum free cortisol (sFC) response to the GST in children and adolescents and determine whether it could predict the GH response to glucagon stimulation.Methods: Infants and children with either short stature or growth attenuation who were referred for evaluation of GH reserve underwent the GST.Results: The study population consisted of 103 subjects (62 females), median age 3.9 years (range, 0.5–14). The mean basal and peak TC levels were 13.3 ± 6.7 μg/dL and 29.6 ± 8.8 μg/dL, respectively. The mean basal and peak sFC levels were 0.7 ± 0.8 μg/dL and 1.7 ± 1.1 μg/dL, respectively. There was a negative correlation between peak TC and age (r = -0.3, P = .007) but not between peak sFC and age (r = -0.09, P = .36). Ninety-five percent of the patients had peak TC levels >15.8 μg/dL and peak sFC levels >0.6 μg/dL.Conclusion: Our results on a cohort of healthy short-statured children can serve as reference values for the sFC response during GST. Based on these results, we propose peak TC levels >15.8 μg/dL and peak sFC levels >0.6 μg/dL for defining normalcy of the HPA axis during the GST in children and adolescents.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotrophic hormoneBMI = body mass indexCBG = cortisol-binding globulinGH = growth hormoneGST = glucagon stimulation testHPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalSDS = standard deviation scoresFC = serum free cortisolTC = total cortisol     

Similar clinical features among patients with severe adult growth hormone deficiency diagnosed with insulin tolerance test or arginine or glucagon stimulation tests

ObjectiveTo determine whether insulin tolerance tests (ITTs), arginine stimulation tests (ASTs), and glucagon stimulation tests (GST) identify patients who have similar clinical features of growth hormone (GH) deficiency when a diagnostic GH threshold of 3 μg/L is used.MethodsData were obtained from the KIMS database (Pfizer International Metabolic Database). Comparisons were made between patients who underwent ITT, AST, or GST for GH peak, body mass index, lipids, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and quality of life.ResultsA total of 5453 tests were available from 4867 patients registered in the database (ITT = 3111, AST To purchase reprints of this article, please visit: www.aace.com/reprints. Copyright © 2012 AACE = 1390, GST = 952). Significant (P < .001) intraindividual correlations were observed between the GH peaks for ITT vs AST (r = 0.655), ITT vs GST (r = 0.445), and AST vs GST (r = 0.632). GH peaks in response to all tests were negatively correlated to the number of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and positively correlated to the insulinlike growth factor 1 standard deviation score. Body mass index had a negative influence on all 3 tests. Most clinical variables did not differ between the groups when comparing GH-deficient patients according to the diagnostic test used. The only exceptions that showed any difference were body mass index (slightly higher in the AST and GST groups), triglyceride levels (increased in the GST group), and insulinlike growth factor 1 (standard deviation score) (lower in the ITT and AST groups than in the GST group). Waist circumference was greater and quality of life was worse in the GST group than in the other groups.ConclusionsThe ITT, AST, and GST produce similar GH peaks, are influenced by similar clinical factors, and identify patients with similar features of GH deficiency at a diagnostic threshold of 3 μg/L. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:325-334)     

Trends In Growth Hormone Stimulation Testing And Growth Hormone Dosing In Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency Patients: Results From The Answer Program

Objective: Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) results in physiologic impairments that may reduce quality of life and negatively impact body composition. AGHD can be treated with recombinant human growth hormone (GH). This study analyzes AGHD patients enrolled in the American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled-Research (ANSWER) Program/NovoNet, a U.S. observational noninterventional study of patients treated with Norditropin® (somatropin &lsqb;recombinant DNA origin] injection) at the discretion of their physicians.Methods: Data were evaluated for GH stimulation test (GHST) usage and Norditropin® doses over 4 years.Results: Adults (N = 468) with isolated GHD (IGHD) or multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) were evaluated. The most commonly used GHSTs were arginine + L-dopa (27%; mostly a single center) and glucagon (25%; most frequent test after 2009). The percent of patients meeting recommended test-specific cut points varied from 32 to 100%, depending on the GHST used. Mean baseline GH doses were higher for MPHD patients and for younger patients in both IGHD and MPHD groups.Conclusion: MPHD was more common than IGHD. Mean GH doses were higher in younger patients, consistent with a transition from higher pediatric to lower adult dosing. Over time, glucagon became the most popular GHST. The use, in some patients, of other GHSTs with cut points, as well as starting doses not consistent with current recommendations, highlights the need for continued education regarding treatment guidelines for AGHD.Abbreviations:AACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsAGHD = adult growth hormone deficiencyANSWER = American Norditropin® Studies: Web-Enabled-ResearchBMI = body mass indexGH = growth hormoneGHD = growth hormone deficiencyGHRH = growth hormone-releasing hormoneGHST = growth hormone stimulation testIGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiencyITT = insulin tolerance testKIMS = Pfizer International Metabolic DatabaseMPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencyTES = The Endocrine Society     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults and Patients Transitioning from Pediatric to Adult Care

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG).Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols.Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence).Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH–stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document.LAY ABSTRACTThis updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH–stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH–stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH–stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone–releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor–binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test     

The Low-Dose Acth Stimulation Test: is 30 Minutes Long Enough?

Objective: Controversy persists regarding the use of the low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test (LDST) for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) and optimal test result interpretation. However, many centers are now using the LDST to assess cortisol secretion adequacy, and some only use a 30-minute cortisol level to determine adrenal sufficiency or AI. This study examined both 30- and 60-minute cortisol levels to assess whether the interpretation of the test was affected when both cortisol levels were taken into consideration.Methods: Data were obtained by retrospective chart review from a single pediatric endocrinology unit over a 7-year period. We identified 82 patients who completed the LDST. Their mean age was 11.7 years, and 37% were female. Cortisol levels were evaluated at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after cosyntropin administration. A cutoff value ≥18 μg/dL was used to define adrenal sufficiency.Results: We found that 54% of patients reached peak cortisol levels at 60 minutes, and 11 patients who did not pass the test at 30 minutes did so at 60 minutes. The only predictive characteristic was weight status; overweight and obese individuals tended to peak at 30 minutes, and normal and underweight individuals tended to peak at 60 minutes.Conclusion: Although further studies are necessary to confirm our findings, it appears that measuring cortisol both 30 and 60 minutes following synthetic ACTH administration may be necessary to avoid overdiagnosing AI.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AI = adrenal insufficiency BMI = body mass index LDST = low-dose ACTH stimulation test MRI = magnetic resonance imaging     

Performance of Free Versus Total Cortisol Following Cosyntropin Stimulation Testing in an Outpatient Setting

Objective: Free cortisol (FC) is potentially superior to total cortisol (TC) measurements in selected clinical settings; however, the advantages of uniform use of FC in outpatient settings are unclear. The objectives of this study were to describe the dynamic response of FC during cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST) compared to TC and to determine the rates of discordance.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 295 stable patients who underwent CST in an outpatient Endocrine Testing Center. The main outcome measures were TC and FC measurements during CST.Results: The mean age of the 295 subjects was 49.1 (16.9) years. Of 218 females, 43 were taking estrogen therapy (ET) at the time of testing. Adrenal insufficiency (AI) was diagnosed in 41/295 (14%) patients. The FC concentrations were associated with TC concentrations at baseline (R² = 0.77, P<.001), 30 minutes (R² = 0.87, P<.001), and 60 minutes (R² = 0.90, P<.001). The FC cutoffs for AI were 873 and 1,170 ng/dL at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively. The FC had a more pronounced fold change from baseline to peak than TC (median 3.2 vs. 1.7, P<.001). Both TC and FC at baseline were higher in females on ET compared to those who were not and to males; however, peak TC and FC values were similar. In 3/43 females on ET, FC, and TC results were discordant (P = .003).Conclusion: We report 99% concordance of TC and FC measurements in a large outpatient cohort. The discordant rates were high in females treated with ET (7%). The FC measurements during CST in females on ET may provide a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of AI.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormoneAI = adrenal insufficiencyCBG = corticosteroid-binding proteinCST = cosyntropin stimulation testingET = estrogen therapyFC = free cortisolfΔ = fold changeROC = receiver operating characteristicTC = total cortisol     

Utility of a Single Late-Night Plasma Cortisol and Acth for the Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of various screening tests for the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome (CS).Methods: Thirty-five patients with CS and 16 patients of pseudo-CS were enrolled. Assessment of 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC), late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC), overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ONDST), late-night plasma cortisol (LNPC), and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) on outpatient basis, and during sleep as well as in awake state after 48 hours of hospital admission.Results: We found that 24-h UFC performed the best among the screening tests with sensitivity, specificity and areas under the curve (AUCs) of 96.0%, 99%, and 0.988, respectively, at a cut-off of 144.6 μg/24 h. A cut-off of 10.5 nmol/L for LNSC had sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 88.2%, and an AUC of 0.897. A cut-off of 412.4 nmol/L for LNPC on outpatient basis had sensitivity 88.2%, specificity 91.2%, and an AUC of 0.957. Cut-offs of 215 and 243.3 nmol/L for LNPC during sleep and awake states after acclimatization had sensitivity, specificity, and an AUC of 94.1%, 88.2%, and 0.958, respectively. An ONDST cut-off of 94.6 nmol/L provided sensitivity, specificity, and an AUC of 96.0%, 99.03% and 0.995, respectively. A cut-off of 30.3 pg/mL for late-night ACTH on outpatient basis had sensitivity 67.6%, specificity 99.9%, and an AUC 0.796.A cut-off of 22.6 pg/mL for ACTH during sleep state after acclimatization had sensitivity, specificity, and an AUC of 73.5%, 99.2%, and 0.827, respectively.Conclusion: UFC is the best screening test for CS. Furthermore, single measurements of LNPC and ACTH help to establish the diagnosis and ACTH dependency of CS in the majority of patients with CS.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormoneAUC = area under the curveCRH = corticotropin-releasing hormoneCS = Cushing syndromeECLIA = electrochemiluminescence immuno-assayLDDST = low-dose dexamethasone suppression testLNPC = late-night plasma cortisolLNSC = late-night salivary cortisolONDST = overnight dexamethasone suppression testRIA = radio-immuno assayUFC = urinary free cortisol     

Prevelence of Primary Aldosteronism in an Urban Hypertensive Population

Objective: To determine the prevalence of primary aldosteronism (PA) in hypertensive patients presenting to the primary care clinic at The Mount Sinai Hospital, regardless of the degree of hypertension and to identify clinical criteria that should prompt screening for PA.Methods: An aldosterone:renin ratio (ARR, cutoff ≥20, with plasma aldosterone concentration [PAC] ≥10 and suppressed renin) was used to prospectively screen 296 hypertensive patients (blood pressure [BP] ≥140/90) over the age of 18 from August 2012 through May 2013. Subjects who screened positive then underwent confirmatory oral salt load testing (OSLT).Results: Of the 296 patients, 14 screened positive for PA, an overall prevalence of 4.7%. Six of the 14 cases underwent confirmatory OSLT, upon which 2 were confirmed positive, for a prevalence of 0.7%. Overall, patients with confirmed PA were more likely to have resistant hypertension (42.9% vs. 18.1% (P =.0334)) and require more antihypertensive agents (2.8 ± 1.2 agents vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 agents, P =.0213). There was a trend toward lower potassium values in the cases.Conclusion: The prevalence of PA in our clinic is much lower than in reports from certain “at-risk” populations. PA screening is indicated in patients with resistant hypertension, regardless of serum potassium levels.Abbreviations:ARR = aldosterone:renin ratioACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormoneAVS = adrenal venous samplingBP = blood pressureMRA = mineralocorticoid receptor antagonistOSLT = oral salt load confirmatory testPA = primary aldosteronismPAC = plasma aldosterone concentrationPCP = primary care providerPRA = plasma renin activity     

Discordance Between Gh and Igf-1 Levels in Turkish Acromegalic Patients

Objective: Discordance between insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) levels is an important problem in the follow-up of patients diagnosed with acromegaly. Our aims were to evaluate the discordance between IGF-1 and GH levels and compare the performance of different cut-off levels for the nadir in GH (GHn) in acromegalic patients.Methods: The study included 63 acromegalic patients in a follow-up at a tertiary care university hospital facility. Levels of IGF-1, IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and GH were investigated. The baseline GH and GHn levels were evaluated after an oral glucose tolerance test (cut-offs of 0.4 and 1 ng/mL, respectively). The discordance rates between GHn and IGF-1 levels, and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratios were determined.Results: We first adopted a GHn cut-off value of 1 ng/mL and found that 27 patients (42.9%) exhibited biochemical remission (BR) (IGF-1 <95^th percentile, GH <1), and 25 patients (39.7%) had no BR (NBR) (IGF-1 ≥95^th percentile, GH >1).Discordance in the presence of normal IGF-1 and nonsuppressed GH (DC1) occurred in 2 of 63 (3.2%) patients; discordance in the presence of high IGF-1 and suppressed GH (DC2) occurred in 9 of 63 (14.3%) patients. If the GHn cut-off value adopted was 0.4 ng/mL, the distributions were 17 of 63 (27.0%) patients in BR, 29 of 63 (46.0%) patients in NBR, 12 of 63 (19.0%) in DC1, and 5 of 63 (7.9%) patients in DC2. If only the baseline GH values were considered, the distributions were very similar to those with a GHn cut-off value of 0.4 ng/mL. The IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio was lowest in the BR group.Conclusion: Adopting a GHn cut-off value of 0.4 ng/mL did not increase the test performance compared with baseline GH only. In contrast, in the follow-up of acromegalic patients, the IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio might be a useful measurement when discordance between IGF-1 and GH levels occurs. We propose that these values be considered in clinical practice.Abbreviations:BR = biochemical remissionDC1 = discordance group 1DC2 = discordance group 2DM = diabetes mellitusGH = growth hormoneGHn = nadir in GHIGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1IGFBP-3 = IGF binding protein-3LAR = long-acting releaseNBR = not in biochemical remissionOGTT = oral glucose tolerance test     

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in patients with childhood-onset GH deficiency: retesting after one year of therapy and at final height

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that many patients treated with growth hormone (GH) during childhood because of idiopathic GH deficiency (GHD) are no longer GH deficient when retested after cessation of GH therapy when final height is achieved. These patients are labelled as transient GHD. We hypothesized that normalization of GH secretion in transient GHD could occur earlier during the course of GH treatment, which could allow earlier cessation of GH treatment. METHODS: In a retrospective study, GH secretion was re-evaluated after cessation of GH treatment at final height in 43 patients diagnosed during childhood as idiopathic GHD (10 with multiple pituitary hormonal deficiencies (MPHD) and 33 with isolated GHD (IsGHD)). In a prospective study, GH secretion was re-assessed after interruption of GH treatment given for 1 year in 18 children with idiopathic GHD (2 MPHD, 16 IsGHD). GH secretion was evaluated by glucagon or insulin stimulation tests. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, all the 10 patients with MPHD and 64% of the 33 patients with IsGHD were still deficient at re-evaluation using the paediatric criteria to define GHD (GH peak <10 ng/ml at provocative test). The proportion of persisting deficiency was greater in patients with complete IsGHD (86%, 12/14 patients) than in patients with partial IsGHD (47%, 9/19 patients). With the criteria proposed in adulthood (GH peak <3 ng/ml), all the 10 patients with MPHD were still considered to be deficient. In contrast, only 15% (5/33 patients) with IsGHD had a maximal GH value <3 ng/ml (36% of the 14 patients with complete IsGHD and none of the 19 patients with partial IsGHD). In the prospective study, after interruption of GH therapy given for 1 year, the 2 patients with MPHD were still GHD at re-evaluation and they resumed GH treatment. Among the 16 patients with IsGHD, 13 (81%) were still deficient (peak response <10 ng/ml) after 1 year. Two of the 3 patients in whom GHD was not confirmed at retesting after 1 year GH showed again a deficient response at second retesting. CONCLUSIONS: Although many patients diagnosed with IsGHD during childhood have a normalized GH secretory capacity when retested during adulthood, early retesting after interruption of GH treatment given for 1 year during childhood does not enable to determine if GH therapy has to be discontinued before cessation of growth.     

可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验在矮小儿童生长激素缺乏症中的诊断价值及生长激素峰值的影响因素分析

目的:探讨可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验在矮小儿童生长激素缺乏症(GHD)中的诊断价值,并分析生长激素(GH)峰值的影响因素。方法:选取2016年5月到2018年7月期间因身材矮小来安徽理工大学附属亳州医院就诊的矮小儿童120例,所有儿童均进行可乐定、精氨酸激发试验,比较可乐定、精氨酸、可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验的阳性率,以可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验的结果为标准,将120例矮小儿童分为GHD组(76例)和非GHD组(44例),比较两组儿童的年龄、骨龄、体质量指数(BMI)、体重指数标准差积分(BMI SDS)、胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-3(IGFBP-3)、GH峰值,分析可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验中GH峰值与各临床指标的相关性,并采用多因素逐步回归分析法分析可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验中GH峰值的影响因素。结果:可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验的阳性率高于可乐定激发试验和精氨酸激发试验的阳性率(P0.05),可乐定激发试验的阳性率高于精氨酸激发试验的阳性率(P0.05)。GHD组儿童BMI、BMI SDS高于非GHD组,IGF-1、GH峰值低于非GHD组(P0.05)。经Pearson相关分析显示,可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验中儿童的BMI、BMI SDS与GH峰值呈负相关,IGF-1与GH峰值呈正相关(P0.05)。多因素逐步回归分析结果显示,可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验中儿童的BMI SDS和IGF-1是GH峰值的影响因素(P0.05)。结论:可乐定联合精氨酸激发试验在矮小儿童GHD诊断中具有较高的阳性率,其诊断价值高于两种药物单独进行激发试验,且儿童的BMI SDS和IGF-1是激发试验GH峰值的影响因素,在进行激发试验时需考虑儿童的BMI SDS和IGF-1水平对诊断结果造成的影响。     

Serum Morning Cortisol as A Screening Test for Adrenal Insufficiency

Objective: To evaluate the performance of morning serum cortisol (MSC) compared to a 10 mg adrenocortico-tropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI).Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of ACTH stimulation tests were conducted. From a total of 312 potentially eligible ACTH stimulation tests, 306 met the inclusion criteria. The population was randomized into 2 groups: test (n = 159) and validation (n = 147). In the test group, the receiver operating characteristics curve test evaluated the diagnostic performance of MSC.Results: A subnormal cortisol response to ACTH was found in 25.8% of the test group. The area under the curve values of MSC to predict AI at +30 minutes, +60 minutes, or at maximal cortisol response were 0.874, 0.897, and 0.925 (95% confidence interval &lsqb;CI] 0.81 to 0.92, 0.83 to 0.93, and 0.87 to 0.96). The Youden index was 234.2 mmol/L with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 65.2 to 94.3%), and a specificity of 89.1% (95% CI 82.4 to 93.9%). Positive and negative predictive values were 64.1% (95% CI 47.1 to 78.8%) and 95.8% (95% CI 90.5 to 98.6%). There was no difference in age, gender, AI prevalence, or mean serum cortisol at +30 or +60 minutes in the validation group; however, a lower mean MSC value was found. Lower sensitivity and specificity values (88.3% and 60%, respectively) were found for the 234.2 mmol/L cutoff value.Conclusion: This study supports the role of MSC as a first-step diagnostic test in patients with clinically suspected AI. The short stimulation test could be omitted in almost half of the cases. Prospective and longitudinal studies to reproduce and confirm the cutoff values proposed are warranted.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI = adrenal insufficiency; AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval; HPA = hypothalamic pituitary adrenal; ITT = insulin tolerance test; MSC = morning serum cortisol     

Limitations of Current Approaches For The Treatment of Acromegaly

Objective: Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH), typically from a benign pituitary somatotroph adenoma, that leads to subsequent hypersecretion of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Patients with acromegaly have an increased risk of mortality and progressive worsening of comorbidities. Surgery, medical therapy, and radiotherapy are currently available treatment approaches for patients with acromegaly, with overall therapeutic goals of lowering GH levels and achieving normal IGF-1 levels, reducing tumor size, improving comorbidities, and minimizing mortality risk. Although surgery can lead to biochemical remission in some patients with acromegaly, many patients will continue to have uncontrolled disease and require additional treatment.Methods: We reviewed recently published reports and present a summary of the safety and efficacy of current treatment modalities for patients with acromegaly.Results: A substantial proportion of patients who receive medical therapy or radiotherapy will have persistently elevated GH and/or IGF-1. Because of the serious health consequences of continued elevation of GH and IGF-1, there is a need to improve therapeutic approaches to optimize biochemical control, particularly in high-need patient populations for whom current treatment options provide limited benefit.Conclusion: This review discusses current treatment options for patients with acromegaly, limitations associated with each treatment approach, and areas within the current treatment algorithm, as well as patient populations for which improved therapeutic options are needed. Novel agents in development were also highlighted, which have the potential to improve management of patients with uncontrolled or persistent acromegaly.Abbreviations:AACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsAE = adverse eventATG = AutogelCFRT = conventional fractionated radiotherapyDA = dopamine agonistENDO = Endocrine SocietyGH = growth hormoneGHRA = growth hormone receptor antagonistIGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1LAR = long-acting releaseLFT = liver function testSC = subcutaneousSRS = stereotactic radiosurgerySSA = somatostatin analoguesst = somatostatin receptorsst₂ = somatostatin receptor subtype 2sst₅ = somatostatin receptor subtype 5TSS = transsphenoidal surgery     

Morning Serum Cortisol Level After Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma Predicts Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Function Despite Intraoperative Dexamethasone Use

Objective: Perioperative glucocorticoid (GC) is rarely needed in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). We instituted a steroid-sparing protocol in the settings of intraoperative dexamethasone use. We evaluated the safety of using a cut off cortisol level of 14 μg/dL on postoperative day (POD)-1 and -6 after dexamethasone use during the surgery. We also analyzed the efficacy of serial morning cortisol levels for weaning GC replacement.Methods: The charts of 48 adult patients who received dexamethasone 4 mg intraoperatively were reviewed. Morning cortisol levels were measured on POD-1. Patients with cortisol ≥14 μg/dL were discharged without CG replacement. Morning cortisol level was checked routinely on POD-6, and GC replacement was initiated when the level was <14 μg/dL. Serial cortisol levels were measured in patients requiring GC after the first postoperative week.Results: Overall, 67% patients had POD-1 cortisol ≥14 μg/dL and did not require GC on discharge. After POD-6, 83% of patients were not on GC replacement. A cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST) was only performed in 3 patients. There were no hospital admissions for adrenal crisis during the postoperative period.Conclusion: A steroid-sparing protocol with POD-1 and -6 morning cortisol levels can be safely and effectively used in the settings of intraoperative dexamethasone administration. It leads to avoidance of GC in more than two-thirds of patients on discharge and more than 80% of patients after the first postoperative week. We found that dynamic adrenal testing could be omitted in the majority of patients by using serial morning cortisol levels to assess the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AI = adrenal insufficiency CST = cosyntropin stimulation test ECLIA = electrochemiluminescence immunoassay GC = glucocorticoid HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal ITT = insulin tolerance test POD = postoperative day TSS = transsphenoidal surgery     

Significant Elevation of Growth Hormone Level Impacts Surgical Outcomes in Acromegaly

Objective: Transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA) is first-line treatment for acromegaly. Our aim was to determine the impact of pre-operative biochemical parameters on the outcomes of surgery.Methods: Retrospective case series of 79 consecutive acromegalics operated between 1994 and 2013. Inclusion criteria were: first TSA, pathology-confirmed growth hormone (GH) adenoma, and follow-up >3 months. Biochemical remission was defined as normal insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) without adjuvant therapy during follow-up.Results: Median follow-up was 35.4 months (range, 3 to 187 months). Logistic regression analysis showed that the best model to predict long-term remission included the following pre-operative markers: GH, tumor diameter, and cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) (area under the curve, 0.933). A threshold GH of 40 ng/mL was associated with long-term remission (sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 42%). Group A (GH >40 ng/mL) comprised 19 patients (9 men); age, 43 ± 13 years; tumor diameter, 2.7 ± 1.0 cm; 73.7% with CSI; and pre-operative median GH, 77.8 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 66.7 to 107.0 ng/mL). Three patients (15%) in group A achieved remission at 3 months, but 2 patients recurred during follow-up. Group B (GH ≤40 ng/mL) comprised 60 patients (25 men); age, 47 ± 13 years; tumor diameter, 1.6 ± 1.0 cm; 35% with CSI, preoperative median GH, 6.9 ng/mL (IQR, 3.4 to 16.9 ng/mL). Thirty-five patients (58%) in group B achieved remission at 3 months without recurrence during follow-up. Group A had larger tumors and a higher proportion of tumors with CSI (P<.05).Conclusion: Both GH and IGF-1 should be measured pre-operatively, as highly elevated GH levels negatively impact long-term surgical remission. This strategy allows early identification of patients who require adjuvant therapy and may decrease time to biochemical control.Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve CSI = cavernous sinus invasion GH = growth hormone ICA = internal carotid artery IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1 MRI = magnetic resonance imaging OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test POD2 = postoperative day 2 TSA = transsphenoidal adenomectomy