Centromeric dots in crane-fly spermatocytes: meiotic maturation and malorientation

During the first meiotic division in crane-fly spermatocytes, the two homologs of a metaphase bivalent each bear two sister kinetochores oriented toward the same pole. We have previously reported treatments that increase the percentage of metaphase bivalents in which one or both homologs have bipolar malorientations: kinetochore microtubules] extending from a homolog toward both poles. The maloriented homologs lag at anaphase. Treatments that induce this behavior include: (a) recoverey from exposure to low temperatures or Colcemid or Nocodazole concentrations that prevent spindle formation but allow nuclear membrane breakdown, and (b) exposure to 6° C, a temperature that permits spindle assembly but slows progression through meiosis. Giemsa staining methods reveal two 0.5 m diameter dots at the centromeric region of each metaphase homolog; these often are more separated in maloriented homologs. This investigation was undertaken to assess whether this separation precedes the establishment of bipolar malorientation, and hence may be a cause of it, or is only a consequence of forces resulting from bipolar malorientation. Analysis showed that, in untreated cells, the average center-to-center distance between sister centromeric dots increases during the course of meiosis I. After the above-mentioned treatments, center-to-center distances similar to those normally seen in untreated half-bivalents at anaphase I were seen in bivalents, both after and before nuclear membrane breakdown. Longer exposure to temperatures that arrested meiosis increased the degree of dot separation. Based on our data, we conclude that normal orientation during the first meiotic division is aided by the close apposition of centromeric dots, and that a time-dependent maturation occurs causing centromeric dots to separate for the second meiotic division and facilitating orientation of sister kinetochores to opposite poles. If centromeric maturation occurs either prior to or during early stages of the first meiotic division, then it may contribute to persisting bipolar malorientation.     

Meiotic events at the centromeric heterochromatin: histone H3 phosphorylation, topoisomerase IIα localization and chromosome condensation

Mechanisms of chromosome condensation and segregation during the first meiotic division are not well understood. Resolution of recombination events to form chiasmata is important, for it is chiasmata that hold homologous chromosomes together for their oppositional orientation on the meiotic metaphase spindle, thus ensuring their accurate segregation during anaphase I. Events at the centromere are also important in bringing about proper attachment to the spindle apparatus. This study was designed to correlate the presence and activity of two proteins at the centromeric heterochromatin, topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) and histone H3, with the processes of chromosome condensation and individualization of chiasmate bivalents in murine spermatocytes. We tested the hypothesis that phosphorylation of histone H3 is a key event instigating localization of TOP2A to the centromeric heterochromatin and condensation of chromosomes as spermatocytes exit prophase and progress to metaphase. Activity of topoisomerase II is required for condensation of chromatin at the end of meiotic prophase. Histone H3 becomes phosphorylated at the end of prophase, beginning with its phosphorylation at the centromeric heterochromatin in the diplotene stage. However, it cannot be involved in localization of TOP2A, since TOP2A is localized to the centromeric heterochromatin throughout most of meiotic prophase. This observation suggests a meiotic function for TOP2A in addition to its role in chromatin condensation. The use of kinase inhibitors demonstrates that phosphorylation of histone H3 can be uncoupled from meiotic chromosome condensation; therefore other proteins, such as those constituting metaphase-promoting factor, must be involved. These results define the timing of important meiotic events at the centromeric heterochromatin and provide insight into mechanisms of chromosome condensation for meiotic metaphase.     

An ‘axis-like’ material in the centromeric region of metaphase-I chromosomes from mouse spermatocytes

This study reports the persistence of axis-like structures in the centromeric region of both homologues during the metaphase-I and anaphase-I stages of meiotic division of mouse spermatocytes. A novel type of silver argentaffin technique (NH₄–Ag) is employed. This technique includes the treatment of glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues with dilute ammonium hydroxide followed by a reduction of aldehyde groups with sodium borohydride. Staining is accomplished with ammoniacal silver nitrate in darkness followed by sulfite washing. The lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes and the single chromosomal axes of diplotene spermatocytes show a prominent reactivity with this technique. The pattern of very small grains over condensed chromatin is uniform and gives only a light opacity to the electron beam. The presence of an axis-like structure is seen in every centromeric end of meiotic chromosomes at metaphase I and anaphase I. The chromatin (heterochromatin) that surrounds the centromeric filament and some material distributed in irregular linear arrays along some of the homologues also showed a higher electron opacity than the bulk of deoxyribonucleoprotein. While the former is related to C+ heterochromatin, the latter could represent dispersed material of diplotene axes. It is suggested that the disposal of axial material is differentially delayed at the centromeric regions. The present evidence supports the hypothesis that axial fragments or lateral-element segments persisting at these regions contribute to the cohesiveness of centromeres of sister chromatids during normal disjunction.     

Meiotic cohesion requires accumulation of ORD on chromosomes before condensation

Cohesion between sister chromatids is a prerequisite for accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. To allow chromosome condensation during prophase, the connections that hold sister chromatids together must be maintained but still permit extensive chromatin compaction. In Drosophila, null mutations in the orientation disruptor (ord) gene lead to meiotic nondisjunction in males and females because cohesion is absent by the time that sister kinetochores make stable microtubule attachments. We provide evidence that ORD is concentrated within the extrachromosomal domains of the nuclei of Drosophila primary spermatocytes during early G2, but accumulates on the meiotic chromosomes by mid to late G2. Moreover, using fluorescence in situ hybridization to monitor cohesion directly, we show that cohesion defects first become detectable in ord(null) spermatocytes shortly after the time when wild-type ORD associates with the chromosomes. After condensation, ORD remains bound at the centromeres of wild-type spermatocytes and persists there until centromeric cohesion is released during anaphase II. Our results suggest that association of ORD with meiotic chromosomes during mid to late G2 is required to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion during prophase condensation and that retention of ORD at the centromeres after condensation ensures the maintenance of centromeric cohesion until anaphase II.     

Spo13 facilitates monopolin recruitment to kinetochores and regulates maintenance of centromeric cohesion during yeast meiosis

BACKGROUND: Cells undergoing meiosis perform two consecutive divisions after a single round of DNA replication. During the first meiotic division, homologous chromosomes segregate to opposite poles. This is achieved by (1) the pairing of maternal and paternal chromosomes via recombination producing chiasmata, (2) coorientation of homologous chromosomes such that sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole, and (3) resolution of chiasmata by proteolytic cleavage by separase of the meiotic-specific cohesin Rec8 along chromosome arms. Crucially, cohesin at centromeres is retained to allow sister centromeres to biorient at the second division. Little is known about how these meiosis I-specific events are regulated. RESULTS: Here, we show that Spo13, a centromere-associated protein produced exclusively during meiosis I, is required to prevent sister kinetochore biorientation by facilitating the recruitment of the monopolin complex to kinetochores. Spo13 is also required for the reaccumulation of securin, the persistence of centromeric cohesin during meiosis II, and the maintenance of a metaphase I arrest induced by downregulation of the APC/C activator CDC20. CONCLUSION: Spo13 is a key regulator of several meiosis I events. The presence of Spo13 at centromere-surrounding regions is consistent with the notion that it plays a direct role in both monopolin recruitment to centromeres during meiosis I and maintenance of centromeric cohesion between the meiotic divisions. Spo13 may also limit separase activity after the first division by ensuring securin reaccumulation and, in doing so, preventing precocious removal from chromatin of centromeric cohesin.     

Histone modifications related to chromosome silencing and elimination during male meiosis in Bengalese finch

We report here that a germline-restricted chromosome (GRC) is regularly present in males and females of the Bengalese finch (Lonchura domestica). While the GRC is euchromatic in oocytes, in spermatocytes this chromosome is cytologically seen as entirely heterochromatic and presumably inactive. The GRC is observed in the cytoplasm of secondary spermatocytes, indicating that its elimination from the nucleus occurs during the first meiotic division. By immunofluorescence on microspreads, we investigated the presence of histone H3 modifications throughout male meiosis, as well as in postmeiotic stages. We found that the GRC is highly enriched in di- and trimethylated histone H3 at lysine 9 during prophase I, in agreement with the presumed inactive state of this chromosome. At metaphase I, dimethylated histone H3 is no longer detectable on the GRC and its chromatin is more faintly stained with DAPI. The condensed GRC is underphosphorylated at serine 10 compared to the regular chromosomes during metaphase I, being phosphorylated later at this site after the first meiotic division. From these results, we proposed that trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 on the GRC chromatin increases during metaphase I. This hypermethylated state at lysine 9 may preclude the phosphorylation of the adjacent serine 10 residue, providing an example of cross-talk of histone H3 modifications as described in experimental systems. The differential underphosphorylation of the GRC chromatin before elimination is interpreted as a cytologically detectable byproduct of deficient activity of Aurora B kinase, which is responsible for the phosphorylation of H3 at serine 10 during mitosis and meiosis.     

A comparative study of male meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis

Male meiosis in D. melanogaster cytologically follows the usual pattern, whereas in D. melanogaster and in D. virilis oocytes the chromosomes clump into a karyosphere at early meiotic prophase and remain so up to metaphase I.Male meiosis in D. virilis spermatocytes has an intermediate character: a part of the chromatin clumps together in a karyosphere at early prophase, whereas the other part of the chromatin remains diffuse all through prophase. At the end of prophase, the diffuse chromatin becomes integrated into the karyosphere before metaphase I. During the meiotic divisions the chromosomes have the same clumped aspect as those in Drosophila oocytes and thus differ strikingly from the dividing chromosomes in D. melanogaster spermatocytes.In D. virilis spermatocytes the nucleolus exhibits changes during the meiotic prophase that may be related to synthetical activities. The DNA specific staining with the fluorochrome DAPI reveals the existence of extrachromosomal DNA in the later prophase. Other striking differences in meiotic events between the two Drosophila species concern the centrioles and spermiogenesis.     

Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster

Two disjunction defective meiotic mutants, ord and mei-S332, each of which disrupts meiosis in both male and female Drosophila melanogaster, were analyzed cytologically and genetically in the male germ-line. It was observed that sister-chromatids are frequently associated abnormally during prophase I and metaphase I in ord. Sister chromatid associations in mei-S332 are generally normal during prophase I and metaphase I. By telophase I, sister chromatids have frequently precociously separated in both mutants. During the first division sister chromatids disjoin from one another frequently in ord and rarely in mei-S332. It is argued that the simplest interpretation of the observations is that each mutant is defective in sister chromatid cohesiveness and that the defect in ord manifests itself earlier than does the defect in mei-S332. In addition, based on these mutant effects, several conclusions regarding normal meiotic processes are drawn. (1) The phenotype of these mutants support the proposition that the second meiotic metaphase (mitotic-type) position of chromosomes and their equational orientation is a consequence of the equilibrium, at the metaphase plate, of pulling forces acting at the kinetochores and directed towards the poles. (2) Chromosomes which lag during the second meiotic division tend to be lost. (3) Sister chromatid cohesiveness, or some function necessary for sister chromatid cohesiveness, is required for the normal reductional orientation of sister kinetochores during the first meiotic division. (4) The kinetochores of a half-bivalent are double at the time of chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division. Finally, functions which are required throughout meiosis in both sexes must be considered in the pathways of meiotic control.     

Persistence of histone H2AX phosphorylation after meiotic chromosome synapsis and abnormal centromere cohesion in poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (Parp-1) null oocytes

In spite of the impact of aneuploidy on human health little is known concerning the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation of structural or numerical chromosome abnormalities during meiosis. Here, we provide novel evidence indicating that lack of PARP-1 function during oogenesis predisposes the female gamete to genome instability. During prophase I of meiosis, a high proportion of Parp-1^(−/−) mouse oocytes exhibit a spectrum of meiotic defects including incomplete homologous chromosome synapsis or persistent histone H2AX phosphorylation in fully synapsed chromosomes at the late pachytene stage. Moreover, the X chromosome bivalent is also prone to exhibit persistent double strand DNA breaks (DSBs). In striking contrast, such defects were not detected in mutant pachytene spermatocytes. In fully-grown wild type oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage, PARP-1 protein associates with nuclear speckles and upon meiotic resumption, undergoes a striking re-localization towards spindle poles as well as pericentric heterochromatin domains at the metaphase II stage. Notably, a high proportion of in vivo matured Parp-1^(−/−) oocytes show lack of recruitment of the kinetochore-associated protein BUB3 to centromeric domains and fail to maintain metaphase II arrest. Defects in chromatin modifications in the form of persistent histone H2AX phosphorylation during prophase I of meiosis and deficient sister chromatid cohesion during metaphase II predispose mutant oocytes to premature anaphase II onset upon removal from the oviductal environment. Our results indicate that PARP-1 plays a critical role in the maintenance of chromosome stability at key stages of meiosis in the female germ line. Moreover, in the metaphase II stage oocyte PARP-1 is required for the regulation of centromere structure and function through a mechanism that involves the recruitment of BUB3 protein to centromeric domains.     

Involvement of chromatid cohesiveness at the centromere and chromosome arms in meiotic chromosome segregation: A cytological approach

Kinetochores and chromatid cores of meiotic chromosomes of the grasshopper species Arcyptera fusca and Eyprepocnemis plorans were differentially silver stained to analyse the possible involvement of both structures in chromatid cohesiveness and meiotic chromosome segregation. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of these structures in the univalent sex chromosome, and in B univalents with different orientations during the first meiotic division. It was observed that while sister chromatid of univalents are associated at metaphase I, chromatid cores are individualised independently of their orientation. We think that cohesive proteins on the inner surface of sister chromatids, and not the chromatid cores, are involved in the chromatid cohesiveness that maintains associated sister chromatids of bivalents and univalents until anaphase I. At anaphase I sister chromatids of amphitelically oriented B univalents or spontaneous autosomal univalents separate but do not reach the poles because they remain connected at the centromere by a long strand which can be visualized by silver staining, that joins stretched sister kinetochores. This strand is normally observed between sister kinetochores of half-bivalents at metaphase II and early anaphase II. We suggest that certain centromere proteins that form the silver-stainable strand assure chromosome integrity until metaphase II. These cohesive centromere proteins would be released or modified during anaphase II to allow normal chromatid segregation. Failure of this process during the first meiotic division could lead to the lagging of amphitelically oriented univalents. Based on our results we propose a model of meiotic chromosome segregation. During mitosis the cohesive proteins located at the centromere and chromosome arms are released during the same cellular division. During meiosis those proteins must be sequentially inactivated, i.e. those situated on the inner surface of the chromatids must be eliminated during the first meiotic division while those located at the centromere must be released during the second meiotic division.by D.P. Bazett-Jones     

Meiotic chromosome structure. Kinetochores and chromatid cores in standard and B chromosomes of Arcyptera fusca (Orthoptera) revealed by silver staining.

The behaviour of two chromosome structures in silver-stained chromosomes was analyzed through the first meiotic division in spermatocytes of the acridoid species Arcyptera fusca. Results showed that at diakinesis kinetochores and chromatid cores are individualized while they associate in bivalents of metaphase I; only kinetochores and distal core spots associate in the sex chromosome. Metaphase I is characterized by morphological and localization changes of both kinetochores and cores which define the onset of anaphase I. These changes analyzed in both autosomes and in the sex chromosome allow us to distinguish among three different substages in metaphase I spermatocytes. B chromosomes may be present as univalents, bivalents, or trivalents. Metaphase I B univalents are characterized by separated cores except at their distal ends and individualized and flat sister kinetochores. At anaphase I sister kinetochores of lagging B chromatids remain connected through a silver-stained strand. The behaviour of cores and kinetochores of B bivalents is identical with that found in the autosomal bivalents. The differences in the morphology of kinetochores of every chromosome shown by B trivalents at metaphase I may be related to the balanced forces acting on the multivalent. The results show dramatic changes in chromosome organization of bivalents during metaphase I. These changes suggest that chromatid cores are not involved in the maintenance of bivalents. Moreover, the changes in morphology of kinetochores are independent of the stage of meiosis but correlate with the kind of division (amphitelic-syntelic) that chromosomes undergo.     

Localization and development of kinetochores and a chromatid core during meiosis in grasshoppers

Positive staining of kinetochores and a chromatid core has been achieved using a simplified silver staining method in squash preparations from meiotic chromosomes of grasshoppers. This technique permits the exact localization of kinetochores on the chromosomes whether metacentric, acrocentric or ‘telocentric’. The sister kinetochores can be observed from mid-diplotene stages but they are not differentiated during first meiotic metaphase. However they can be observed again at the onset of anaphase 1. The existence of a positively stained chromatid core in meiotic divisions is also reported. This core appears well defined inside each chromatid from diplotene to the end of the second meiotic division. The visualization of these cores in first meiotic metaphase clearly shows the points at which the chiasmata took place.     

An indirect test for a role of the synaptonemal complex in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesiveness

The meiotic behavior of a special maize trisome was quantitatively observed at pachytene, metaphase I, anaphase I, prophase II, metaphase II and anaphase II. The data obtained are consistent with (but do not prove) the model that sister chromatid cohesiveness at anaphase I may be established during pachytene synapsis of the chromosome regions involved. The data suggest, however, that the normal prophase II maintenance of dyad integrity by cohesiveness of sister chromatid centromere regions does not depend upon prior synapsis of these regions, although monads separated from each other on the anaphase I spindle may be delivered to the same prophase II daughter nucleus. — The strands which some of the time connect sister chromatids which are separating equationally at anaphase I show a positive Feulgen staining reaction.     

Condensins I and II are essential for construction of bivalent chromosomes in mouse oocytes

In many eukaryotes, condensins I and II associate with chromosomes in an ordered fashion during mitosis and play nonoverlapping functions in their assembly and segregation. Here we report for the first time the spatiotemporal dynamics and functions of the two condensin complexes during meiotic divisions in mouse oocytes. At the germinal vesicle stage (prophase I), condensin I is present in the cytoplasm, whereas condensin II is localized within the nucleus. After germinal vesicle breakdown, condensin II starts to associate with chromosomes and becomes concentrated onto chromatid axes of bivalent chromosomes by metaphase I. REC8 "glues" chromosome arms along their lengths. In striking contrast to condensin II, condensin I localizes primarily around centromeric regions at metaphase I and starts to associate stably with chromosome arms only after anaphase I. Antibody injection experiments show that condensin functions are required for many aspects of meiotic chromosome dynamics, including chromosome individualization, resolution, and segregation. We propose that the two condensin complexes play distinctive roles in constructing bivalent chromosomes: condensin II might play a primary role in resolving sister chromatid axes, whereas condensin I might contribute to monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores, possibly by assembling a unique centromeric structure underneath.     

Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S332

BACKGROUND: The halving of chromosome number that occurs during meiosis depends on three factors. First, homologs must pair and recombine. Second, sister centromeres must attach to microtubules that emanate from the same spindle pole, which ensures that homologous maternal and paternal pairs can be pulled in opposite directions (called homolog biorientation). Third, cohesion between sister centromeres must persist after the first meiotic division to enable their biorientation at the second. RESULTS: A screen performed in fission yeast to identify meiotic chromosome missegregation mutants has identified a conserved protein called Sgo1 that is required to maintain sister chromatid cohesion after the first meiotic division. We describe here an orthologous protein in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae (Sc), which has not only meiotic but also mitotic chromosome segregation functions. Deletion of Sc SGO1 not only causes frequent homolog nondisjunction at meiosis I but also random segregation of sister centromeres at meiosis II. Meiotic cohesion fails to persist at centromeres after the first meiotic division, and sister centromeres frequently separate precociously. Sgo1 is a kinetochore-associated protein whose abundance declines at anaphase I but, nevertheless, persists on chromatin until anaphase II. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that Sgo1 is localized to the centromere at the time of the first division suggests that it may play a direct role in preventing the removal of centromeric cohesin. The similarity in sequence composition, chromosomal location, and mutant phenotypes of sgo1 mutants in two distant yeasts with that of MEI-S332 in Drosophila suggests that these proteins define an orthologous family conserved in most eukaryotic lineages.     

Cohesion and centromere activity are required for phosphorylation of histone H3 in maize

Haspin‐mediated phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 3 (H3T3ph) promotes proper deposition of Aurora B at the inner centromere to ensure faithful chromosome segregation in metazoans. However, the function of H3T3ph remains relatively unexplored in plants. Here, we show that in maize (Zea mays L.) mitotic cells, H3T3ph is concentrated at pericentromeric and centromeric regions. Additional weak H3T3ph signals occur between cohered sister chromatids at prometaphase. Immunostaining on dicentric chromosomes reveals that an inactive centromere cannot maintain H3T3ph at metaphase, indicating that a functional centromere is required for H3T3 phosphorylation. H3T3ph locates at a newly formed centromeric region that lacks detectable CentC sequences and strongly reduced CRM and ZmBs repeat sequences at metaphase II. These results suggest that centromeric localization of H3T3ph is not dependent on centromeric sequences. In maize meiocytes, H3T3 phosphorylation occurs at the late diakinesis and extends to the entire chromosome at metaphase I, but is exclusively limited to the centromere at metaphase II. The H3T3ph signals are absent in the afd1 (absence of first division) and sgo1 (shugoshin) mutants during meiosis II when the sister chromatids exhibit random distribution. Further, we show that H3T3ph is mainly located at the pericentromere during meiotic prophase II but is restricted to the inner centromere at metaphase II. We propose that this relocation of H3T3ph depends on tension at the centromere and is required to promote bi‐orientation of sister chromatids.     

OsSGO1 maintains synaptonemal complex stabilization in addition to protecting centromeric cohesion during rice meiosis

Shugoshin is a conserved protein in eukaryotes that protects the centromeric cohesin of sister chromatids from cleavage by separase during meiosis. In this study, we identify the rice (Oryza sativa, 2n=2x=24) homolog of ZmSGO1 in maize (Zea mays), named OsSGO1. During both mitosis and meiosis, OsSGO1 is recruited from nucleoli onto centromeres at the onset of prophase. In the Tos17-insertional Ossgo1-1 mutant, centromeres of sister chromatids separate precociously from each other from metaphase I, which causes unequal chromosome segregation during meiosis II. Moreover, the release of OsSGO1 from nucleoli is completely blocked in Ossgo1-1, which leads to the absence of OsSGO1 in centromeric regions after the onset of mitosis and meiosis. Furthermore, the timely assembly and maintenance of synaptonemal complexes during early prophase I are affected in Ossgo1 mutants. Finally, we found that the centromeric localization of OsSGO1 depends on OsAM1, not other meiotic proteins such as OsREC8, PAIR2, OsMER3, or ZEP1.     

BrdU-dye characterization of late replication and meiotic recombination in Armenian hamster germ cells

In vivo BrdU-dye methodology is used to reveal patterns of replication kinetics and meiotic recombination in male germ cells of the Armenian hamster. Analogue substitution over a fraction of the DNA synthesis period results in distinctive 33258 Hoechst fluorescence staining of late replicating chromatin, detectable at spermatogonial or spermatocyte I and II stages. Spermatogonial cells which are extensively substituted with BrdU over the penultimate synthesis period reveal sister chromatid differentiation in all chromosomes of primary or secondary spermatocytes. In chiasmatic regions, exchanges between unlike-stained non-sister chromatids are indicated by isolabelled segments, while those occurring between like-stained non-sister chromatids are not directly detected. In sex chromosomes from young animals, these alternative images occur in a ratio of 11, which supports the concept that homologue non-sister chromatid regions are randomly broken and reunited in the process of chiasma formation. Deviations from randomness appeared to occur in older animals. Sex bivalent chiasmata are either coincident with points of visible exchange, or they appear to have variable degrees of terminalization. Secondary spermatocytes display sharp chromatid contrast, and aid in mapping the positions and frequencies of homologue exchanges.