The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Eukaryotes have long been thought to have arisen by evolving a nucleus, endomembrane, and cytoskeleton. In contrast, it was recently proposed that the first complex cells, which were actually proto-eukaryotes, arose simultaneously with the acquisition of mitochondria. This so-called symbiotic association hypothesis states that eukaryotes emerged when some ancient anaerobic archaebacteria (hosts) engulfed respiring alpha-proteobacteria (symbionts), which evolved into the first energy-producing organelles. Therefore, the intracellular compartmentalization of the energy-converting metabolism that was bound originally to the plasma membrane appears to be the key innovation towards eukaryotic genome and cellular organization. The novel energy metabolism made it possible for the nucleotide synthetic apparatus of cells to be no longer limited by subsaturation with substrates and catalytic components. As a consequence, a considerable increase has occurred in the size and complexity of eukaryotic genomes, providing the genetic basis for most of the further evolutionary changes in cellular complexity. On the other hand, the active uptake of exogenous DNA, which is general in bacteria, was no longer essential in the genome organization of eukaryotes. The mitochondrion-driven scenario for the first eukaryotes explains the chimera-like composition of eukaryotic genomes as well as the metabolic and cellular organization of eukaryotes.     

The origin of the eukaryotic cell. III. Principles of the morphofunctional organization of the eukaryotic cell

The eukaryotic plasmalemma, eukaryotic cytoplasm with its usual cytomembranes, and eukaryotic nucleus are obligatory components of the eukaryotic cell. All other structural elements (organelles) are only derivates of the aforesaid cell components and they may be absent sometimes. There are protozoans having simultaneously no flagelles, mitochondria and chloroplasts (all the representatives of phylum Microspora, amoeba Pelomyxa palustris, and others). The following five general principles play the main role in the morphofunctional organization of the cell. The principle of hierarchy of block organization of living systems. Complex morphofunctional blocks (organelles) specific for the eukaryotic cell are formed. The compartmentalization principle. The main cell organelles (nuclei, flagellae, mitochondria, chloroplasts, etc.) undergo a relative morphological isolation from each other and other cell organelles by means of the total or partial surrounding by membranes; this may ensure the originality of their evolution and function. The principle of poly- and oligomerization of morphofunctional blocks. It permits the cell to enlarge its sizes and to raise the level of integration. The principle of heterochrony, including three subprinciples: conservatism of useful signs; a strong acceleration of evolutionary development of the separate blocks; simplification of the structure, reduction or total disappearance of some blocks. It explains a preservation of prokaryotic signs in the eukaryotic cell or in its organelles. The principle of independent origin of similar morphofunctional blocks in the process of evolution of living systems. The parallelism of the signs in unrelated groups of cells (or protists) arises due to this principle.     

Mitochondrial connection to the origin of the eukaryotic cell.

Phylogenetic evidence is presented that primitively amitochondriate eukaryotes containing the nucleus, cytoskeleton, and endomembrane system may have never existed. Instead, the primary host for the mitochondrial progenitor may have been a chimeric prokaryote, created by fusion between an archaebacterium and a eubacterium, in which eubacterial energy metabolism (glycolysis and fermentation) was retained. A Rickettsia-like intracellular symbiont, suggested to be the last common ancestor of the family Rickettsiaceae and mitochondria, may have penetrated such a host (pro-eukaryote), surrounded by a single membrane, due to tightly membrane-associated phospholipase activity, as do present-day rickettsiae. The relatively rapid evolutionary conversion of the invader into an organelle may have occurred in a safe milieu via numerous, often dramatic, changes involving both partners, which resulted in successful coupling of the host glycolysis and the symbiont respiration. Establishment of a potent energy-generating organelle made it possible, through rapid dramatic changes, to develop genuine eukaryotic elements. Such sequential, or converging, global events could fill the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes known as major evolutionary discontinuity.     

The parasitic bacterium Wolbachia and the origin of the eukaryotic cell

The acquisition of endosymbiotic alphaproteobacteria that gave rise to mitochondria was one of the key events in the origin of eukaryotic cell. To reconstruct this process, it is important to analyze relationships that developed later between eukaryotes and other alphaproteobacteria. Wolbachia pipientis, a bacterium that inhabits cells of numerous terrestrial invertebrates and exerts diverse effects on its hosts, is used as a model. Although Wolbachia is similar to mitochondria in many important features (basic metabolism, small molecule membrane transport, envelope structure, etc.), their relationships with the nucleocytoplasm are different. Mitochondria import most of their required proteins from the nucleocytoplasm and are controlled by the nucleocytoplasmic regulatory systems. On the contrary, Wolbachia exports its proteins into the host’s cytoplasm, thus causing dramatic aberrations in the ontogeny and reproduction of the host. This difference may be due to the fact that most of the protomitochondrial genes had been transferred into the central (nuclear) genome at the early stages of the development of the endosymbiotic system, while Wolbachia genes were not transferred into the nucleus. This fits well with the previously suggested hypothesis that there was a period of rapid lateral gene transfer in the evolution of proto-eukaryotes; the acquisition of mitochondria took place during this period. Later, eukaryotes, and especially metazoans, developed powerful mechanisms for prevention of lateral gene transfer. Therefore, the genes of the newly acquired endosymbionts cannot be transferred into the central genome, and the endosymbionts retain the capacity for selfish evolution.     

A hypothesis for DNA viruses as the origin of eukaryotic replication proteins

The eukaryotic replicative DNA polymerases are similar to those of large DNA viruses of eukaryotic and bacterial T4 phages but not to those of eubacteria. We develop and examine the hypothesis that DNA virus replication proteins gave rise to those of eukaryotes during evolution. We chose the DNA polymerase from phycodnavirus (which infects microalgae) as the basis of this analysis, as it represents a virus of a primitive eukaryote. We show that it has significant similarity with replicative DNA polymerases of eukaryotes and certain of their large DNA viruses. Sequence alignment confirms this similarity and establishes the presence of highly conserved domains in the polymerase amino terminus. Subsequent reconstruction of a phylogenetic tree indicates that these algal viral DNA polymerases are near the root of the clade containing all eukaryotic DNA polymerase delta members but that this clade does not contain the polymerases of other DNA viruses. We consider arguments for the polarity of this relationship and present the hypothesis that the replication genes of DNA viruses gave rise to those of eukaryotes and not the reverse direction.     

The origin of heterochromatin in eukaryotes

This study is an attempt to reconstruct the stages of the evolution of heterochromatin in eukaryotes. According to the hypothesis put forward in the work, the origin of satellite DNAs (stDNAs) was directly related to certain functional characteristics of DNA polymerases, and stDNAs themselves are products of accidental slippage at replication initiation sites. Even at the moment when the stDNAs precursors (protosatellites) appeared, they had properties of selfish DNA. Therefore, specific complex mechanisms of genetic control of their replication and recombination have developed in evolution to restrict the spread of these DNAs over the genome. The host control over protosatellites has led to the appearance of the main heterochromatic characteristics in them, such as late replication, decreased recombination, and denser chromatin packing compared to euchromatin. The next stage of heterochromatin evolution led to the union of protosatellite clusters and ordinary genes if late replication was necessary for these genes or if gene complexes already formed required protection from the destructure effect of crossing over. The known cases of location of certain genes in heterochromatic blocks in Drosophila melanogaster, the eukaryote that has been best studied genetically, confirm this hypothesis.     

The genome reduction hypothesis and the phylogeny of eukaryotes

The first steps in eukaryotic evolution appear difficult to retrace despite the availability of an increasing amount of data. Current molecular phylogenies suggest that the eukaryotic tree would be better represented as a bush of major lineages whose order of emerge is poorly resolved. Such lack of resolution is often explained by a radiation event that would have left very little ancient signal in eukaryotic molecular markers. We suggest a complementary genomic approach that might help tackling this major issue. It rests on a hypothesis, the genome reduction hypothesis (GRH), suggesting that the divergence of major eukaryotic lineages might have been coupled with independent genomic reduction events, starting from a large and partially redundant chimerical genome. Thus, significant and coherent patterns of shared ancestral gene losses between major eukaryotic lineages might help polarizing the most basal nodes in the eukaryotic phylogeny. We propose a test for the GRH that exploits the increasing availability of complete eukaryotic genomes in public databases.     

The origin of eukaryotes: a reappraisal

Ever since the elucidation of the main structural and functional features of eukaryotic cells and subsequent discovery of the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria and plastids, two opposing hypotheses have been proposed to account for the origin of eukaryotic cells. One hypothesis postulates that the main features of these cells, including their ability to capture food by endocytosis and to digest it intracellularly, were developed first, and later had a key role in the adoption of endosymbionts; the other proposes that the transformation was triggered by an interaction between two typical prokaryotic cells, one of which became the host and the other the endosymbiont. Re-examination of this question in the light of cell-biological and phylogenetic data leads to the conclusion that the first model is more likely to be the correct one.     

A single eubacterial origin of eukaryotic pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase genes: implications for the evolution of anaerobic eukaryotes.

The iron sulfur protein pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFO) is central to energy metabolism in amitochondriate eukaryotes, including those with hydrogenosomes. Thus, revealing the evolutionary history of PFO is critical to understanding the origin(s) of eukaryote anaerobic energy metabolism. We determined a complete PFO sequence for Spironucleus barkhanus, a large fragment of a PFO sequence from Clostridium pasteurianum, and a fragment of a new PFO from Giardia lamblia. Phylogenetic analyses of eubacterial and eukaryotic PFO genes suggest a complex history for PFO, including possible gene duplications and horizontal transfers among eubacteria. Our analyses favor a common origin for eukaryotic cytosolic and hydrogenosomal PFOs from a single eubacterial source, rather than from separate horizontal transfers as previously suggested. However, with the present sampling of genes and species, we were unable to infer a specific eubacterial sister group for eukaryotic PFO. Thus, we find no direct support for the published hypothesis that the donor of eukaryote PFO was the common alpha-proteobacterial ancestor of mitochondria and hydrogenosomes. We also report that several fungi and protists encode proteins with PFO domains that are likely monophyletic with PFOs from anaerobic protists. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PFO domains combine with fragments of other redox proteins to form fusion proteins which participate in methionine biosynthesis. Our results are consistent with the view that PFO, an enzyme previously considered to be specific to energy metabolism in amitochondriate protists, was present in the common ancestor of contemporary eukaryotes and was retained, wholly or in part, during the evolution of oxygen-dependent and mitochondrion-bearing lineages.     

On the origin of eukaryotic cytoskeleton.

The origin of eukaryote-specific cytoskeletal proteins is an issue which is closely related to the origin of the domain Eukarya. As nearly all of these proteins are not found in prokaryotes, the prokaryotic origin of eukaryotic cytoskeletal network suggested by most models is questionable. Eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins might descend from subpopulations of pre-cells co-existing with Bacteria and Archaea prior to the origin of eukaryotes. The pre-karyote (the host for a-proteobacterial ancestors of mitochondria) might have already possessed eukaryotic-like cytoskeleton. A possible role for viruses in the origin of eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins is discussed. Viruses parasitizing on pre-cells and/or on the pre-karyote might have themselves used several eukaryotic-like cytoskeletal proteins for segregation and packing of their genomes.     

The archaeal 'TACK' superphylum and the origin of eukaryotes

Although most hypotheses to explain the emergence of the eukaryotic lineage are conflicting, some consensus exists concerning the requirement of a genomic fusion between archaeal and bacterial components. Recent phylogenomic studies have provided support for eocyte-like scenarios in which the alleged 'archaeal parent' of the eukaryotic cell emerged from the Crenarchaeota/Thaumarchaeota. Here, we provide evidence for a scenario in which this archaeal parent emerged from within the 'TACK' superphylum that comprises the Thaumarchaeota, Crenarchaeota and Korarchaeota, as well as the recently proposed phylum 'Aigarchaeota'. In support of this view, functional and comparative genomics studies have unearthed an increasing number of features that are uniquely shared by the TACK superphylum and eukaryotes, including proteins involved in cytokinesis, membrane remodeling, cell shape determination and protein recycling.     

The origin of the eukaryotic cell. II. A critical analysis of the symbiotic (exogenous) concept

The exogenous (symbiotic) conception of the eukaryotic cell origin is unable to explain satisfactory the structure of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Either of these organelles possess its genome that can be compared with the viral one rather than with the bacterial one, judging by the dimensions and quantity of coding genes. The mitochondria resemble a little prokaryotes in the number of their proteins, chemical composition of their inner membrane and peculiarities of the protein-synthesizing apparatus. The primitive structure of mt DNA, the lesser quantity and greater unspecifity of the mitochondrial tRNA prove, additionally, the non-bacterial origin of this organelles. The deflexion of the genetic code from the universal one in the mitochondrial nucleoids also testify in favour of this point of view. The results of micropaleontological and paleobiochemical investigations evidence towards initial ability of the primary eukaryotes (primary protists) to photosynthesis. In this case, they did not need to acquire plastids from outside by symbiotic way. The autogenous origin of the flagellum of the primary protists was reported earlier (Seravin, 1985). The accumulated data permit us to consider that the cell organelles formed endogenously in the process of evolution of the cell.     

Early evolution and the origin of eukaryotes

Our understanding of evolutionary relationships in the eukaryotic world has been revolutionized by molecular systematics. Phylogenies based upon comparisons of rRNAs define five major eukaryotic assemblages plus a series of paraphyletic protist lineages. Comparison of conserved genes that were duplicated prior to the divergence of eubacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes, positions the root of the universal tree within the eubacterial line of descent. In this review a novel model is presented which uses the rRNA and protein based phylogenies to describe the evolutionary origins of eukaryotes.     

Changing perspectives on the origin of eukaryotes

From the initial application of molecular techniques to the study of microbial organisms, three domains of life emerged, with eukaryotes and archaea as sister taxa. However, recent analyses of an expanding molecular data set reveal that the eukaryotic genome is chimeric with respect to archaea and bacteria. Moreover, there is now evidence that the primitive eukaryotic group ‘Archezoa' once harbored mitochondia. These discoveries have challenged the traditional stepwise model of the evolution of eukaryotes, in which the nucleus and microtubules evolve before the acquisition of mitochondria, and consequently compel a revision of existing models of the origin of eukaryotic cells.     

Metabolic symbiosis at the origin of eukaryotes

Thirty years after Margulis revived the endosymbiosis theory for the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts, two novel symbiosis hypotheses for the origin of eukaryotes have been put forward. Both propose that eukaryotes arose through metabolic symbiosis (syntrophy) between eubacteria and methanogenic Archaea. They also propose that this was mediated by interspecies hydrogen transfer and that, initially, mitochondria were anaerobic. These hypotheses explain the mosaic character of eukaryotes (i.e. an archaeal-like genetic machinery and a eubacterial-like metabolism), as well as distinct eukaryotic characteristics (which are proposed to be products of symbiosis). Combined data from comparative genomics, microbial ecology and the fossil record should help to test their validity.     

The origin of the eukaryotic cell. I. Historical sources and current state of the concept of symbiotic and autogenic origins of the cell

The exogenous (symbiotic) conception of the eukaryotic origin is now widely spread. It is based on the recognition of the principle of combination (addition or enclosing) of diverse prokaryotic organisms; so the complicated unicellular eukaryotic organism (eukaryotic cell) was resulted. the principle of combination takes its historical scientific sources from the ideas of Buffon. With reference to the cell this principle was claimed for the first time. In our time the exogenous conception is characterized as a "symbiotic boom", because it is widely used in attempts to explain the origin of all the main organelles of the cell (right up to the micro-bodies). The autogenetic (endogenous) conception is based on the principle of straight phyliation, on the recognition of a successive evolutionary transformation of prokaryotic forms into eukaryotic ones. In this way all the cell organelles may have an endogenous origin. This principle springing from Lamarck has got a contemporary meaning in the doctrine of Darwin. In the next papers the author will present his own analysis and generation of the present day relevant facts to find out which of these two conceptions based on quite different scientific methodological principles may be correct.     

A genomic timescale for the origin of eukaryotes

Background  

Genomic sequence analyses have shown that horizontal gene transfer occurred during the origin of eukaryotes as a consequence of symbiosis. However, details of the timing and number of symbiotic events are unclear. A timescale for the early evolution of eukaryotes would help to better understand the relationship between these biological events and changes in Earth's environment, such as the rise in oxygen. We used refined methods of sequence alignment, site selection, and time estimation to address these questions with protein sequences from complete genomes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes.     

The phylogenetic position of red algae revealed by multiple nuclear genes from mitochondria-containing eukaryotes and an alternative hypothesis on the origin of plastids

Abstract Red algae are one of the main photosynthetic eukaryotic lineages and are characterized by primitive features, such as a lack of flagella and the presence of phycobiliproteins in the chloroplast. Recent molecular phylogenetic studies using nuclear gene sequences suggest two conflicting hypotheses (monophyly versus non-monophyly) regarding the relationships between red algae and green plants. Although kingdom-level phylogenetic analyses using multiple nuclear genes from a wide-range of eukaryotic lineages were very recently carried out, they used highly divergent gene sequences of the cryptomonad nucleomorph (as the red algal taxon) or incomplete red algal gene sequences. In addition, previous eukaryotic phylogenies based on nuclear genes generally included very distant archaebacterial sequences (designated as the outgroup) and/or amitochondrial organisms, which may carry unusual gene substitutions due to parasitism or the absence of mitochondria. Here, we carried out phylogenetic analyses of various lineages of mitochondria-containing eukaryotic organisms using nuclear multigene sequences, including the complete sequences from the primitive red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Amino acid sequence data for two concatenated paralogous genes (α- and β-tubulin) from mitochondria-containing organisms robustly resolved the basal position of the cellular slime molds, which were designated as the outgroup in our phylogenetic analyses. Phylogenetic analyses of 53 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 1525-amino-acid sequence of four concatenated nuclear genes (actin, elongation factor-1α, α-tubulin, and β-tubulin) reliably resolved the phylogeny only in the maximum parsimonious (MP) analysis, which indicated the presence of two large robust monophyletic groups (Groups A and B) and the basal eukaryotic lineages (red algae, true slime molds, and amoebae). Group A corresponded to the Opisthokonta (Metazoa and Fungi), whereas Group B included various primary and secondary plastid-containing lineages (green plants, glaucophytes, euglenoids, heterokonts, and apicomplexans), Ciliophora, Kinetoplastida, and Heterolobosea. The red algae represented the sister lineage to Group B. Using 34 OTUs for which essentially the entire amino acid sequences of the four genes are known, MP, distance, quartet puzzling, and two types of maximum likelihood (ML) calculations all robustly resolved the monophyly of Group B, as well as the basal position of red algae within eukaryotic organisms. In addition, phylogenetic analyses of a concatenated 4639-amino-acid sequence for 12 nuclear genes (excluding the EF-2 gene) of 12 mitochondria-containing OTUs (including C. merolae) resolved a robust non-sister relationship between green plants and red algae within a robust monophyletic group composed of red algae and the eukaryotic organisms belonging to Group B. A new scenario for the origin and evolution of plastids is suggested, based on the basal phylogenetic position of the red algae within the large clade (Group B plus red algae). The primary plastid endosymbiosis likely occurred once in the common ancestor of this large clade, and the primary plastids were subsequently lost in the ancestor(s) of the Discicristata (euglenoids, Kinetoplastida, and Heterolobosea), Heterokontophyta, and Alveolata (apicomplexans and Ciliophora). In addition, a new concept of “Plantae” is proposed for phototrophic and nonphototrophic organisms belonging to Group B and red algae, on the basis of the common history of the primary plastid endosymbiosis. The Plantae include primary plastid-containing phototrophs and nonphototrophic eukaryotes that possibly contain genes of cyanobacterial origin acquired in the primary endosymbiosis.