Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara. It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara. Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.     

Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

Abstract. In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara . It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara . Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.     

Imprinted facultative heterochromatization in mealybugs

In lecanoid Coccids, or mealybugs, the male development is accompanied by the facultative heterochromatization of the entire, paternally derived, haploid chromosome set. This epigenetic phenomenon occurs in all the cells of mid-cleavage male embryos. Consequently, the Coccid chromosome system offers a powerful tool for gaining insights into the structure of facultative heterochromatin, and into the epigenetic mechanisms of its imprinted, developmentally regulated formation. This paper will present new data and summarize recent studies on genomic imprinting and facultative heterochromatization in mealybugs. First, the existence and the possible role of DNA methylation as an epigenetic modification that fulfills the requisites of the imprinting process in mealybugs will be considered. The second part of this paper will focus on proteins involved in the facultative heterochromatization process. In particular, the involvement of an HP-1-like protein in the silencing of the paternally derived haploid chromosome set and its interaction with the lysine 9 methylated isoform of histone H3 will be discussed.     

Genomic imprinting: male mice with uniparentally derived sex chromosomes

Although it has been known that there is an X-chromosome imprinting effect during early embryogenesis in female mammals, it remains unknown if parental origin of the X chromosome has an effect in males. Furthermore, it has not been possible to produce animals with normal sex chromosomes of uniparental origin to further evaluate such imprinting effects. We have devised a breeding scheme to produce male mice, designated XPYP males, in which both the X and Y chromosomes are paternally inherited. To our knowledge, these are the first mammals produced that have a normal sex chromosome constitution but with both sex chromosomes derived from one parent. Development and reproduction in these XPYP males and the sex ratio and chromosome constitution of their offspring appeared normal; thus there is no apparent effect in males of having both sex chromosomes derive from one parent or of having the X chromosome derived from an inappropriate parent. Although we have detected no X-chromosome imprinting effect in these males, evidence from other sources suggest that the X chromosome is parentally imprinted. Thus detection and definition of an imprint can depend on the assay used.     

Molecular links between X-inactivation and autosomal imprinting: X-inactivation as a driving force for the evolution of imprinting?

In classical Mendelian inheritance, each parent donates a set of chromosomes to its offspring so that maternally and paternally encoded information is expressed equally. The phenomena of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and autosomal imprinting in mammals violate this dogma of genetic equality. In XCI, one of the two female X chromosomes is silenced to equalize X-linked gene dosage between XX and XY individuals. In genomic imprinting, parental marks determine which of the embryo's two autosomal alleles will be expressed. Although XCI and imprinting appear distinct, molecular evidence now shows that they share a surprising number of features. Among them are cis-acting control centers, long-distance regulation and differential DNA methylation. Perhaps one of the most intriguing similarities between XCI and imprinting has been their association with noncoding and antisense RNAs. Very recent data also suggest the common involvement of histone modifications and chromatin-associated factors such as CTCF. Collectively, the evidence suggests that XCI and genomic imprinting may have a common origin. Here, I hypothesize that the need for X-linked dosage compensation was a major driving force in the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals. I propose that imprinting was first fixed on the X chromosome for XCI and subsequently acquired by autosomes.     

Inverted meiosis and meiotic drive in mealybugs

In the males of lecanoid coccids, or mealybugs, an entire, paternally derived, haploid chromosome set becomes heterochromatic after the seventh embryonic mitotic cycle. In females, both haploid sets are euchromatic throughout the life cycle. In mealybugs, as in all homopteran species, chromosomes are holocentric. Holocentric chromosomes are characterized by the lack of a localized centromere and consequently of a localized kinetic activity. In monocentric species, sister chromatid cohesion and monopolar attachment play a pivotal role in regulating chromosome behavior during the two meiotic divisions. Both these processes rely upon the presence of a single, localized centromere and as such cannot be properly executed by holocentric chromosomes. Here we furnish further evidence that meiosis is inverted in both sexes of mealybugs and we suggest how this might represent an adaptation to chromosome holocentrism. Moreover, we reveal that at the second meiotic division in males a monopolar spindle is formed, to which only euchromatic chromosomes become attached. By this mechanism the paternally derived, heterochromatic, haploid chromosome set strictly segregates from the euchromatic one, and it is then excluded from the genetic continuum as a result of meiotic drive.Communicated by E.A. Nigg     

Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana require DNA methylation

Some genes in mammals and flowering plants are subject to parental imprinting, a process by which differential epigenetic marks are imposed on male and female gametes so that one set of alleles is silenced on chromosomes contributed by the mother while another is silenced on paternal chromosomes. Therefore, each genome contributes a different set of active alleles to the offspring, which develop abnormally if the parental genome balance is disturbed. In Arabidopsis, seeds inheriting extra maternal genomes show distinctive phenotypes such as low weight and inhibition of mitosis in the endosperm, while extra paternal genomes result in reciprocal phenotypes such as high weight and endosperm overproliferation. DNA methylation is known to be an essential component of the parental imprinting mechanism in mammals, but there is less evidence for this in plants. For the present study, seed development was examined in crosses using a transgenic Arabidopsis line with reduced DNA methylation. Crosses between hypomethylated and wild-type diploid plants produced similar seed phenotypes to crosses between plants with normal methylation but different ploidies. This is consistent with a model in which hypomethylation of one parental genome prevents silencing of alleles that would normally be active only when inherited from the other parent - thus phenocopying the effects of extra genomes. These results suggest an important role for methylation in parent-of-origin effects, and by inference parental imprinting, in plants. The phenotype of biparentally hypomethylated seeds is less extreme than the reciprocal phenotypes of uniparentally hypomethylated seeds. The observation that development is less severely affected if gametes of both sexes (rather than just one) are 'neutralized' with respect to parent-of-origin effects supports the hypothesis that parental imprinting is not necessary to regulate development.     

Establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation patterns in mouse Ndn: implications for maintenance of imprinting in target genes of the imprinting center

Ndn is located on chromosome 7C, an imprinted region of the mouse genome. Imprinting of Ndn and adjacent paternally expressed genes is regulated by a regional imprinting control element known as the imprinting center (IC). An IC also controls imprint resetting of target genes in the region of conserved synteny on human chromosome 15q11-q13, which is deleted or rearranged in the neurodevelopmental disorder Prader-Willi syndrome. Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation, which occur in gametes and can be stably propagated, are presumed to establish and maintain the imprint in target genes of the IC. While most DNA becomes substantially demethylated by the blastocyst stage, some imprinted genes have regions that escape global demethylation and may maintain the imprint. We have now analyzed the methylation of 39 CpG dinucleotide sequences in the 5' end of Ndn by sodium bisulfite sequencing in gametes and in preimplantation and adult tissues. While sperm DNA is completely unmethylated across this region, oocyte DNA is partially methylated. A distinctive but unstable maternal methylation pattern persists until the morula stage and is lost in the blastocyst stage, where low levels of methylation are present on most DNA strands of either parental origin. The methylation pattern is then substantially remodeled, and fewer than half of maternally derived DNA strands in adult brain resemble the oocyte pattern. We postulate that for Ndn, DNA methylation may initially preserve a gametic imprint during preimplantation development, but other epigenetic events may maintain the imprint later in embryonic development.     

Equal parental origin of chromosome 22 losses in human sporadic meningioma: no evidence for genomic imprinting.

Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes can occur either by mutation at the gene locus or by loss of part or all of the chromosome region containing the gene. The latter is most frequently detected by DNA markers as loss of heterozygosity in the tumor tissue. In several reports, the paternal homologue was preferentially retained in embryonal tumors associated with loss of particular chromosomal regions, suggesting genomic imprinting of the corresponding tumor suppressor loci. To explore the generality of these findings and the possible role of genomic imprinting in adult tumors of the nervous system, we have determined the parental origin of chromosome 22 loss in sporadic meningioma. Of nine cases studied, five tumors retained the maternally derived chromosome 22 homologue while four retained the paternally derived chromosome 22. Thus, in contrast to the embryonal tumors, the meningioma locus on chromosome 22 is inactivated by random mutation in sporadic adult meningiomas.     

Differential methylation persists at the mouse Rasgrf1 DMR in tissues displaying monoallelic and biallelic expression

A subset of mammalian genes exhibits genomic imprinting, whereby one parental allele is preferentially expressed. Differential DNA methylation at imprinted loci serves both to mark the parental origin of the alleles and to regulate their expression. In mouse, the imprinted gene Rasgrf1 is associated with a paternally methylated imprinting control region which functions as an enhancer blocker in its unmethylated state. Because Rasgrf1 is imprinted in a tissue-specific manner, we investigated the methylation pattern in monoallelic and biallelic tissues to determine if methylation of this region is required for both imprinted and non-imprinted expression. Our analysis indicates that DNA methylation is restricted to the paternal allele in both monoallelic and biallelic tissues of somatic and extraembryonic lineages. Therefore, methylation serves to mark the paternal Rasgrf1 allele throughout development, but additional factors are required for appropriate tissue-specific regulation of expression at this locus.     

CpG methylation of an X-linked transgene is determined by somatic events postfertilization and not germline imprinting

The process of X-inactivation in mammals requires at least two events, the initiation of inactivation and the maintenance of the inactive state. One possible mechanism of control is by methylation of DNA at CpG dinucleotides to maintain the inactive state. Furthermore, the paternal X-chromosome is frequently inactivated in the extraembryonic membranes. The relationship between the parental origin of the chromosome, nonrandom inactivation and DNA methylation is not clear. In this paper, we report on the CpG methylation of an X-linked transgene, CAT-32. The levels of methylation in embryonic, extraembryonic and germline cells indicates that the modifications of the transgene are broadly similar to those reported for endogenous X-linked genes. Interestingly, the methylation of CAT-32 transgene in extraembryonic tissues displays patterns that could be linked to the germline origin of each allele. Hence, the maternally derived copy of CAT-32 was relatively undermethylated when compared to the paternal one. The changes in DNA methylation were attributed to de novo methylation occurring after fertilization, most probably during differentiation of extraembryonic tissues. In order to determine whether or not the patterns of DNA methylation reflected the germline origin of the X-chromosome, we constructed triploid embryos specifically to introduce two maternal X-chromosomes in the same embryo. In some of these triploid conceptuses, methylation patterns characteristic of the paternally derived transgene were observed. This observation indicates that the methylation patterns are not necessarily dependent on the parental origin of the X-chromosome, but could be changed by somatic events after fertilization. One of the more likely mechanisms is methylation of the transgene following inactivation of the X-chromosome in extraembryonic tissues.     

A DNA methylation imprint, determined by the sex of the parent, distinguishes the angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes

The Angelman (AS) and Prader-Willi (PWS) syndromes are two clinically distinct disorders that are caused by a differential parental origin of chromosome 15q11-q13 deletions. Both also can result from uniparental disomy (the inheritance of both copies of chromosome 15 from only one parent). Loss of the paternal copy of 15q11-q13, whether by deletion or maternal uniparental disomy, leads to PWS, whereas a maternal deletion or paternal uniparental disomy leads to AS. The differential modification in expression of certain mammalian genes dependent upon parental origin is known as genomic imprinting, and AS and PWS represent the best examples of this phenomenon in humans. Although the molecular mechanisms of genomic imprinting are unknown, DNA methylation has been postulated to play a role in the imprinting process. Using restriction digests with the methyl-sensitive enzymes HpaII and HhaI and probing Southern blots with several genomic and cDNA probes, we have systematically scanned segments of 15q11-q13 for DNA methylation differences between patients with PWS (20 deletion, 20 uniparental disomy) and those with AS (26 deletion, 1 uniparental disomy). The highly evolutionarily conserved cDNA, DN34, identifies distinct differences in DNA methylation of the parental alleles at the D15S9 locus. Thus, DNA methylation may be used as a reliable, postnatal diagnostic tool in these syndromes. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the first known epigenetic event, dependent on the sex of the parent, for a locus within 15q11-q13. We propose that expression of the gene detected by DN34 is regulated by genomic imprinting and, therefore, that it is a candidate gene for PWS and/or AS.     

Survival of XO mouse fetuses: effect of parental origin of the X chromosome or uterine environment?

Using a recombinant product from the structurally abnormal Y chromosome, Y*, female mice with a single X of either maternal or paternal origin were generated. The two types of females were produced on the same genetic background and differ only in the origin of the X chromosome. Hence it has been possible to assess the effect of parental origin of the X on survival of females with a single X chromosome. A highly significant prenatal loss of females with a single X of paternal origin, but no comparable loss of females with a single X of maternal origin was observed. The reduced viability of females with a paternally derived X could be mediated by the parental origin of the X (i.e. X chromosome imprinting) or alternatively, since the mothers of females with a single paternally derived X have only a single X chromosome, the effect could be mediated by the genotype of the mother (i.e. maternal uterine effect).     

MIRA-SNuPE,a quantitative,multiplex method for measuring allele-specific DNA methylation

5-methyl-C (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethyl-C (5hmC) are epigenetic marks with well-known and putative roles in gene regulation, respectively. These two DNA covalent modifications cannot be distinguished by bisulfite sequencing or restriction digestion, the standard methods of 5mC detection. The methylated CpG island recovery assay (MIRA), however, specifically detects 5mC but not 5hmC. We further developed MIRA for the analysis of allele-specific CpG methylation at differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of imprinted genes. MIRA specifically distinguished between the parental alleles by capturing the paternally methylated H19/Igf2 DMR and maternally methylated KvDMR1 in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) carrying paternal and maternal duplication of mouse distal Chr7, respectively. MIRA in combination with multiplex single nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE) assays specifically captured the methylated parental allele from normal cells at a set of maternally and paternally methylated DMRs. The assay correctly recognized aberrant biallelic methylation in a case of loss of imprinting. The MIRA-SNuPE assays revealed that placenta exhibited less DNA methylation bias at DMRs compared to yolk sac, amnion, brain, heart, kidney, liver and muscle. This method should be useful for the analysis of allele-specific methylation events related to genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation and for verifying and screening haplotype-associated methylation differences in the human population.Key words: epigenetics, imprinting, DMR, MIRA, MBD, DNA methylation, SNuPE     

Biparental inheritance of RAPD markers in males of the pseudo-arrhenotokous mite Typhlodromus pyri.

In pseudo-arrhenotokous mites, haploid males develop from fertilized eggs that undergo paternal genome loss (PGL) during early embryogenesis. We present evidence that some of the paternal genome may be retained in males of the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Two reproductively compatible populations were differentiated by two random amplified polymorphic DNA markers and the inheritance pattern in the offspring was analysed. Maternal transmission rates are variable and independent of the sex of the offspring and of the marker. These data suggest a nuclear origin and independent segregation of the markers. One marker (330 base pairs (bp)) was paternally transmitted to male as well as female offspring, the other (990 bp) was paternally transmitted to all females and some of the male offspring. We propose that the paternal set of inactivated chromosomes may be partially retained in some tissues of the haploid males or, alternatively, that a B chromosome does not follow the process of PGL in male embryos, thereby segregating with the maternal set. The possible mechanisms controlling the condensation and the segregation of the chromosome(s) retained are discussed on the basis of current hypotheses on chromosome inactivation in insects.     

The development of XO gynogenetic mouse embryos

Diploid gynogenetic embryos, which have two sets of maternal and no paternal chromosomes, die at or soon after implantation. Since normal female embryos preferentially inactivate the paternally derived X chromosome in certain extraembryonic membranes, the inviability of diploid gynogenetic embryos might be due to difficulties in achieving an equivalent inactivation of one of their two maternally derived X chromosomes. In order to investigate this possibility, we constructed XO gynogenetic embryos by nuclear transplantation at the 1-cell stage. These XO gynogenones showed the same mortality around the time of implantation as did their XX gynogenetic counterparts. This shows that the lack of a paternally derived autosome set is sufficient to cause gynogenetic inviability at this stage. Autosomal imprinting and its possible relation to X-chromosome imprinting is discussed.     

Parental origin and phenotype of triploidy in spontaneous abortions: predominance of diandry and association with the partial hydatidiform mole

The origin of human triploidy is controversial. Early cytogenetic studies found the majority of cases to be paternal in origin; however, recent molecular analyses have challenged these findings, suggesting that digynic triploidy is the most common source of triploidy. To resolve this dispute, we examined 91 cases of human triploid spontaneous abortions to (1) determine the mechanism of origin of the additional haploid set, and (2) assess the effect of origin on the phenotype of the conceptus. Our results indicate that the majority of cases were diandric in origin because of dispermy, whereas the maternally-derived cases mainly originated through errors in meiosis II. Furthermore, our results indicate a complex relationship between phenotype and parental origin: paternally-derived cases predominate among "typical" spontaneous abortions, whereas maternally-derived cases are associated with either early embryonic demise or with relatively late demise involving a well-formed fetus. As the cytogenetic studies relied on analyses of the former type of material and the molecular studies on the latter sources, the discrepancies between the data sets are explained by differences in ascertainment. In studies correlating the origin of the extra haploid set with histological phenotype, we observed an association between paternal-but not maternal-triploidy and the development of partial hydatidiform moles. However, only a proportion of paternally derived cases developed a partial molar phenotype, indicating that the mere presence of two paternal genomes is not sufficient for molar development.