Differentiation of Non-articulated Laticifers in Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.)

Differentiation of non-articulated laticifers in poinsettia(Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.) was studied ultra-structurally.Growing laticifers show: (1) a multinucleate apical region containingabundant ribosomes but few other differentiated organelles and(2) a sub-apical zone where the cytoplasm is dominated by vacuolesof diverse morphology with latex particles. These particlesappear first within narrow tubular vacuoles developed especiallyin the peripheral cytoplasm. During vacuolation of the laticifer,portions of cytoplasm, including some of the nuclei, becomeisolated by the enlarging and fusing vacuoles; eventually thesebecome lysed, except the latex particles which remain in thecentral vacuole. During differentiation of a laticifer branch,the cytoplasm contains the usual organelles, including a fewmicrobodies and coated vesicles. The plastids that lie withinthe peripheral cytoplasm differentiate into amyloplasts witha single elongated starch grain. Towards the end of differentiationthe cytoplasm becomes restricted to a thin parietal layer, withthe remaining organelles reduced or degenerate, surroundinga central vacuole filled with latex particles. Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd, poinsettia, ultrastructure, differentiation, laticifers     

Distribution and Organization of Non-articulated Laticifers in Mature Tissues of Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.)

The distribution and cytological organization of non-articulatedbranched laticifers in the mature root, stem, and leaf tissuesof poinsettia. Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd., were studied bythe use of optical and electron microscopy. The laticifers occurin all parts of the plant body, being well represented in certainparenchymatous tissues and the phloem. The mature region ofthe laticifer has a living protoplast showing a thin parietalcytoplasm, bounded by plasmalemma and a tonoplast, which enclosesa large continuous central vacuole containing the milky latexfluid. The protoplast is multinucleate and possesses large amyloplasts,each enclosing a single elongated starch grain. Sparseness andpoor differentiation of the other components of the protoplast,mostly mitochondria, ribosomes and endoplasmic reticulum, suggestlow metabolism in the mature region of the laticifer. The latexof the central vacuole is dominated by spherical particles,0.3–1 µm in diameter, each with a dense matrix andan eccentric core of lighter staining material. In some laticifersthe latex particles fuse into coagulated masses. Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd, poinsettia, laticifers, ultrastructure, cytology     

The gravity-regulated growth of axillary buds is mediated by a mechanism different from decapitation-induced release

When the upper part of the main shoot of the Japanese morning glory (Pharbitis nil or Ipomoea nil) is bent down, the axillary bud situated on the uppermost node of the bending region is released from apical dominance and elongates. Here, we demonstrate that this release of axillary buds from apical dominance is gravity regulated. We utilized two agravitropic mutants of morning glory defective in gravisensing cell differentiation, weeping (we) and weeping2 (we2). Bending the main shoots of either we or we2 plants resulted in minimal elongation of their axillary buds. This aberration was genetically linked to the agravitropism phenotype of the mutants, which implied that shoot bending-induced release from apical dominance required gravisensing cells. Previous studies have shown that basipetal translocation of auxin from the apical bud inhibits axillary bud growth, whereas cytokinin promotes axillary bud outgrowth. We therefore compared the roles of auxin and cytokinin in bending- or decapitation-induced axillary bud growth. In the wild-type and we plants, decapitation increased cytokinin levels and reduced auxin response. In contrast, shoot bending did not cause significant changes in either cytokinin level or auxin response, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying gravity- and decapitation-regulated release from apical dominance are distinct and unique.     

Ethylene Evolution from Bracts and Leaves of Poinsettia, Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd

Woodrow, L. and Grodzinski, B. 1987. Ethylene evolution trombracts and leaves ol Poinsettia, Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.—J.exp. Bot. 38: 2024–2032. Ethylene release from fully expanded, red and white bracts andleaves of poinsettia, Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd., was compared.On a laminar (area) basis leaves contained about 50 times morechlorophyll and demonstrated 10 times the photosynthetic rateof the bracts. Both tissues contained starch, however, solublecarbohydrate in the bracts consisted primarily of reducing hexoseswhile the leaves contained mainly sucrose for translocation.The total free alpha-amino nitrogen content of the bract tissuewas twice that of the leaf tissue. The leaves contained moreACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid) and produced proportionallymore endogenous C²H⁴ than either the red or white bracts. ACC-stimulated₂H₄ release was also greatest from the green tissue indicatingthat the EFE (ethylene forming enzyme) was most active in theleaves. The specific activity of the ¹⁴C₂H₄/¹²C₂H₄ releasedfrom [2,3-¹⁴C]ACC confirmed ACC as the primary precursor ofC₂H₄ in this tissue. Ethylene release from the non-photosynthetic,bract tissue was not markedly affected by alterations in CO₂or light conditions. In green leaf tissue endogeneous ethylenerelease increased from 1·5 to 6·0 pmol C₂H₄ cm^–2h^–1 while ACC-stimulated ethylene release increased from10 to 35 pmol C₂H₄ cm^2– h^1– as the CO₂ partial pressureincreased from 100 to 1 200 µbar. Key words: Poinsettia, ethylene, bracts     

Exogenous Auxin Effects on Lateral Bud Outgrowth in Decapitated Shoots

In 1933 Thimann and Skoog demonstrated exogenous auxin repressionof lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots ofVicia faba. This evidence has given strong support for a role of auxinin apical dominance. Most, but not all, investigators have confirmedThimann and Skoog's results. In the present study, auxin treatmentswere carried out on ten different species or plant types, manyof which were treated with auxin in different forms, media andunder different light conditions. The Thimann–Skoog experimentdid work for most species (i.e. exogenous auxin did repressbud outgrowth) including thedgt tomato mutant which is knownto be insensitive to auxin in certain responses. Toxic auxinsymptoms were observed in some but not all species. The Thimann–Skoogexperiment did not work for greenhouse-grownColeus or forArabidopsis. Light was shown to reduce apical dominance inColeus andIpomoeanil . apical dominance; lateral bud outgrowth; axillary bud; auxin; IAA; decapitation; Vicia faba ; Ipomoea nil ; Pisum sativum ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Lycopersion exculentum ; dgt ; Coleus blumei ; Arabidopsis thaliana ; Helianthus annuus ; Thimann–Skoog     

Epinasty of Poinsettias-the Role of Auxin and Ethylene

Upward physical restraint of the normally horizontal bracts of poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd.) resulted in increased ethylene production and epinastic curvature of the petioles after 5 days. Downward restraint caused little change in ethylene production or epinasty, indicating that the enhanced ethylene production observed in petioles bent upwards is not due to the bending stress alone. Epinasty, measured upon removal of upward physical restraint, was not affected by spraying plants with aminoxyacetic acid to reduce ethylene production or with silver thiosulfate to prevent ethylene action. Removal of the bract blades prevented the epinastic response of the petiole, and the response was restored by applying indoleacetic acid to the cut petiole end. Redistribution of auxin appears to be responsible for both the epinasty and the increased ethylene production of reoriented poinsettia bracts.     

Cytokinin/Auxin Control of Apical Dominance in Ipomoea nil

Although the concept of apical dominance control by the ratioof cytokinin to auxin is not new, recent experimentation withtransgenic plants has given this concept renewed attention.In the present study, it has been demonstrated that cytokinintreatments can partially reverse the inhibitory effect of auxinon lateral bud outgrowth in intact shoots of Ipomoea nil. Althoughless conclusive, this also appeared to occur in buds of isolatednodes. Auxin inhibited lateral bud outgrowth when applied eitherto the top of the stump of the decapitated shoot or directlyto the bud itself. However, the fact that cytokinin promotiveeffects on bud outgrowth are known to occur when cytokinin isapplied directly to the bud suggests different transport tissuesand/or sites of action for the two hormones. Cytokinin antagonistswere shown in some experiments to have a synergistic effectwith benzyladenine on the promotion of bud outgrowth. If theratio of cytokinin to auxin does control apical dominance, thenthe next critical question is how do these hormones interactin this correlative process? The hypothesis that shoot-derivedauxin inhibits lateral bud outgrowth indirectly by depletingcytokinin content in the shoots via inhibition of its productionin the roots was not supported in the present study which demonstratedthat the repressibility of lateral bud outgrowth by auxin treatmentsat various positions on the shoot was not correlated with proximityto the roots but rather with proximity to the buds. Resultsalso suggested that auxin in subtending mature leaves as wellas that in the shoot apex and adjacent small leaves may contributeto the apical dominance of a shoot. (Received September 24, 1996; Accepted March 16, 1997)     

Topophysis affects the Potential of Axillary Bud Growth, Fresh Biomass Accumulation and Specific Fresh Weight in Single-stem Roses (Rosa hybrida L.)

Topophysis, the effect on growth and differentiation of positionof axillary buds along the shoot, was studied by propagatingfive-leaflet-leaf single-node cuttings which were excised fromseven stem positions and grown as single stemmed plants. InRosahybrida ‘Korokis’ Kiss®, ‘Tanettahn’Manhattan Blue®, and ‘Sweet Promise’ Sonia®,following release of the buds from apical dominance by excision,morphogenetic development was studied until anthesis. The timefrom excision/planting until onset of bud growth, visible flowerbud appearance, and anthesis was generally shorter in plantsoriginating from apical bud positions than from basipetal positions.Topophysis mainly affected the onset of axillary bud growth;the earliest growth and development was found in cuttings fromthe second uppermost node position. This node tended to havethe lowest plastochron value, which indicated the existenceof a transition between sylleptic and proleptic buds. Stem lengthat visible flower bud and at anthesis generally increased asthe cutting position changed basipetally until the second lowestposition, and the number of five-leaflet-leaves at anthesisand the total number of nodes generally increased basipetally.For internode length, growth rate, and fresh biomass efficiencythe cuttings taken from the uppermost and lowermost positionsgenerally had significantly lower values than cuttings fromall medial positions. At anthesis, plants originating from cuttingsexcised from lower medial positions generally had a higher freshweight, greater flower stem diameter, and a significantly higherspecific fresh weight than those plants originating from apicalor basal positions. Among the cultivars, Sonia was the mostefficient in increasing fresh biomass and had the highest growthrate, whereas Manhattan Blue possessed the highest specificfresh weight, indicating a higher plant quality. It is suggestedthat topophysis inRosa is an independent phenomenon intrinsicto the axillary bud. apical dominance; axillary bud growth; fresh biomass accumulation; cut rose; flowering; Rosaceae; Rosa hybrida L.; rose; shoot growth; single-stem roses; specific fresh weight; topophysis; quality     

Correlative Inhibition in the Shoot of Agropyron repens ( L.) Beauv

Correlative inhibition was investigated in plants of Agropyronrepens at two temperatures. Reciprocal inhibition ocrurred betweenthe main shoot apex and the outgrowing axillary shoots, withthe balance of inhibition varying with temperature. Apical dominancewas stronger at 10 °C than at 20 °C , but even at 10°C release of apical dominance by decapitation had onlyminor effects on the timing of outgrowth, growth pattern andrate of dry weight aocumulation of the axillary shoots. Dominanceof the main shoot apex by the axillary shoots was stronger at20 °C than at 10 °C. Removal of axillary buds preventeddecline in size and activity of the main shoot apex ard resultedin increased rates of primordium initiation, leaf emergenceand dry weight accumulation in the main shoot. It is suggestedthat a system of reciprocal dominance provides a mechanism formaintaining the characteristic habit of the grass plant andlimits growth in height of vegetative shoots. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv, couch grass, correlative inhibition, apical dominance, shoot, apex     

Does Auxin Play a Role in the Release of Apical Dominance by Shoot Inversion in Ipomoea nil?

According to the auxin-inhibition hypothesis of apical dominance,apically produced auxin moves down the stem and inhibits axillarybud outgrowth, either directly or indirectly. This hypothesishas been examined further by monitoring changes in basipetalauxin transport and endogenous auxin concentration in Ipomoeanil caused by shoot inversion, a stimulus that releases apicaldominance. The results indicate that inversion reduces auxintransport in the main stem. In upright shoots of intact plants,a 16-h pretreatment with [³H]IAA 4 cm below the apex resultsin downward movement of label and accumulation in nodes, especiallythe cotyledonary node. Label does not accumulate in the lateralbuds. GC-MS determinations of endogenous free auxin level inthe fourth node, where a lateral bud grows out following inversionof the upper part of the shoot, show no changes at 3 and 8 hafter inversion, the range of times for inversion-induced budrelease, or at 24 h, when bud outgrowth is continuing. However,inversion did cause a just-detectable decrease (approx. 10%)in the IAA level of the shoot's elongation region. Althoughauxin transport in segments of the main stem is partially inhibitedby inversion over a period shorter than the latent time of budrelease, thus providing a means for the expected depletion ofauxin in the fourth node, no depletion could be detected there.These results suggest that either a decrease in IAA level inthe main stem is not causal of bud release or that the decreasedIAA pool responsible for bud release is compartmented and cannotbe measured in whole-tissue extracts.Copyright 1993, 1999 AcademicPress Apical dominance, auxin content, auxin transport, axillary bud release, GC-MS, Ipomoea nil, Pharbitis nil, shoot inversion     

Apical Dominance Control in Ipomoea nil: The Influence of the Shoot Apex, Leaves and Stem

The outgrowth of lateral buds is known to be controlled by theupper shoot tissues, which include the apex, the young leavesand the upper stem. An analysis of the influence of these plantparts on axillary bud elongation in Ipomoea nil was carriedout by various treatments on these specific tissues. A restriction of elongation in the main shoot due to eitherdecapitation or shoot inversion resulted in the release of apicaldominance A non-linear type of compensating growth relationshipwas observed between the 13 cm apical growing region of thestem and the lateral buds. It was determined by decapitation,defoliation and AgNO₃ treatments that both the 13 cm stem-growthregion and the young leaves (1–5 cm in length) had a muchgreater inhibitory influence on the outgrowth of specified lateralbuds than did the stem apex (consisting of the terminal 0.5cm of the shoot). The specified lateral buds which were analyzedfor outgrowth were located a number of nodes below the shootapex. The intervening nodes were debudded. Although the importanceof young leaves in the control of apical dominance has beenpreviously recognized, the most significant result from thepresent study with Ipomoea was the strong influence of the 13cm apical growth region of the stem on the out growth of thelateral buds. Apical dominance, Ipomoea nil L., Pharbitis nil, growth region, lateral bud outgrowth, decapitation, defoliation, shoot inversion     

Development and Growth Potential of Axillary Buds in Roses as Affected by Bud Age

The effect of axillary bud age on the development and potentialfor growth of the bud into a shoot was studied in roses. Ageof the buds occupying a similar position on the plant variedfrom 'subtending leaf just unfolded' up to 1 year later. Withincreasing age of the axillary bud its dry mass, dry-matterpercentage and number of leaves, including leaf primordia, increased.The apical meristem of the axillary bud remained vegetativeas long as subjected to apical dominance, even for 1 year. The potential for growth of buds was studied either by pruningthe parent shoot above the bud, by grafting the bud or by culturingthe bud in vitro. When the correlative inhibition (i.e. dominationof the apical region over the axillary buds) was released, additionalleaves and eventually a flower formed. The number of additionalleaves decreased with increasing bud age and became more orless constant for axillary buds of shoots beyond the harvestablestage, while the total number of leaves preceding the flowerincreased. An increase in bud age was reflected in a greaternumber of scales, including transitional leaves, and in a greaternumber of non-elongated internodes of the subsequent shoot.Time until bud break slightly decreased with increasing budage; it was long, relatively, for 1 year old buds, when theysprouted attached to the parent shoot. Shoot length, mass andleaf area were not clearly affected by the age of the bud thatdeveloped into the shoot. With increasing bud age the numberof pith cells in the subsequent shoot increased, indicatinga greater potential diameter of the shoot. However, final diameterwas dependent on the assimilate supply after bud break. Axillarybuds obviously need a certain developmental stage to be ableto break. When released from correlative inhibition at an earlierstage, increased leaf initiation occurs before bud break.Copyright1994, 1999 Academic Press Age, axillary bud, cell number, cell size, pith, shoot growth, Rosa hybrida, rose     

Apical Dominanace in Xanthium strumarium: A DISCUSSION IN RELATION TO CURRENT HYPOTHESES OF CORRELATIVE INHIBITION

The influence of the spectral distribution of illumination onthe gibberellin, cytokinin, auxin, and abscisic acid levelsand the correlation with the degree of branching in Xanthiumstrumarium is presented and discussed. Gibberellins do not appearto play a major role in apical dominance but may be importantfor bud extension following the initial release from dominance.The cytokinin level was much higher in inhibited buds than inreleased buds. It is suggested that the cytokinins present wereprobably not able to participate in bud growth because of anauxin-induced accumulation of abscisic acid in the buds themselves.The concentration of abscisic acid as measured by bioassay andgas-liquid chromatography was between 50 and 250 times thatoccurring in all other plants parts examined. This level felldramatically following release from apical dominance by decapitation.The results are discussed in relation to current hypothesesof apical dominance.     

Lateral Bud Growth in Phaseolus vulgaris L. and the Levels of Ethylene in the Bud and Adjacent Tissue

Ethephon and the ethylene inhibitors Ag⁺ and aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) inhibited outgrowth of the axillary bud of thefirst trifoliate leaf in decapitated plants of Phaseolus vulgaris.Endogenous ethylene levels decreased in the stem upon decapitationalthough it is not conclusive that a causal relationship existsbetween this decrease and the release of axillary buds frominhibition. The proposition that auxin-induced ethylene is responsiblefor the suppression of axillary bud growth in the decapitatedplant when the apical shoot is replaced by auxin is not borneout in this study. Application of IAA directly to the axillarybud of intact plants gave rise to a transient increase in budgrowth. This growth increment was annulled when AVG was suppliedwith IAA to the bud despite the fact that the dosage of AVGused did not affect the normal slow growth rate of the bud ofthe intact plant or bud outgrowth resulting from shoot decapitation.     

Factors Influencing the Distribution of Growth Between Stem and Axillary Buds in Decapitated Bean Plants

Phaseolus multiflorus plants at three stages of developmentwere decapitated either immediately below the apical bud orlower down at a point 1 cm above the insertion of the primaryleaves. Growth regulators in lanolin were applied to the cutstem surface. IAA always inhibited axillary bud elongation anddry-matter accumulation, and enhanced internode dry weight butnot elongation. GA₃ applied below the apical bud greatly increasedinternode elongation and dry weight, but simultaneously reducedbud elongation and dry-weight increase. Application of GA₃ 1cm above the buds had no effect on bud elongation in the youngestplants, but enhanced their elongation in the two older groups.IAA always antagonized GA₃-enhancement of internode extensiongrowth, whereas its effects on GA₃-enhanced dry-matter accumulationdepended on the stage of internode development. Bud elongationwas greater in plants treated with GA₃+IAA than in plants treatedonly with IAA, except in the youngest plants decapitated immediatelybelow the apical bud, where GA₃ caused a slight increase inIAA-induced bud inhibition. GA₃ increased inhibition of buddry weight by IAA in the two youngest groups of plants, butslightly reduced it in the oldest plants. No simple compensatorygrowth relationship existed between internode and buds. It wasconcluded that, (1) auxin appears to be the principal growthhormone concerned in correlative inhibition, and (2) availabilityof gibberellin to internode and buds is of importance as a modifyingfactor in auxin-regulated apical dominance by virtue of itslocal effects on growth in the internode and in the buds.     

The role of hormones in apical dominance. New approaches to an old problem in plant development

The role of hormones in apical dominance has been under investigation with traditional 'spray and weigh' methods for nearly 5 decades. Even though the precision of hormone content analyses in tissue has greatly improved in recent years, there have been no significant breakthroughs in our understanding of the action mechanism of this classical developmental response. Auxin appears to inhibit axillary bud outgrowth whereas cytokinins will often promote it. Conclusive evidence for a direct role of these or other hormones in apical dominance has not been forthcoming. However, promising new tools and approaches recently have begun to be utilized. The manipulation of endogenous hormone levels via the use of transgenic plants transformed with bacterial genes ( iaaM and ipt from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and iaaL from Pseudomonas syringae pv. savastanoi ) has demonstrated powerful effects of auxin and cytokinin on axillary bud outgrowth. Also, possible auxin and cytokinin involvement of rolB and C genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes whose activity is associated with reduced apical dominance in dicotyledons has received considerable attention. The characterization of unique mRNAs and proteins in non-growing and growing lateral buds before and after apical dominance release is helping to lay the groundwork for the elucidation of signal transduction and cell cycle regulation in this response. The use of auxin-deficient, and auxin/ethylene-resistant mutants has provided another approach for analyzing the role of these hormones. The presumed eventual employment of molecular assay systems (SAUR/GH3 promoters fused with GUS reporter gene) which are presently being developed for analyzing auxin localized in lateral buds will hopefully provide a critical test for the direct auxin inhibition hypothesis.     

Molecular analysis of signals controlling dormancy and growth in underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge

Dormancy and subsequent regrowth of adventitious buds is a critical physiological process for many perennial plants. We have used the expression of hormone and cell cycle-responsive genes as markers to follow this process in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). In conjunction with earlier studies, we show that loss of mature leaves results in decreased sugar levels and increased gibberellin perception in underground adventitious buds. Gibberellin is sufficient for induction of S phase-specific but not M phase-specific gene expression. Loss of both apical and axillary buds or inhibition of polar auxin transport did not result in induction of S phase- or M phase-specific gene expression. Loss of polar auxin transport was necessary for continuation of the cell cycle and further bud development if the S phase was previously initiated.     

Effects of Kinetin on Growth of the Apical Meristem and Floral Differentiation in Chenopodium rubrum L.

Kinetin (1•10^–4 M and 1•10^–3 M) was appliedto the plumules of 6-day-old Chenopodium rubrum plants. Effectson growth, anatomical structure and organogenesis in the apicalmeristem were followed. Floral differentiation as affected bykinetin was also investigated in plants induced to flower byshort-day treatment. Kinetin increased mitotic activity in the apical meristems inboth induced and non-induced plants. The effect was most pronouncedin the peripheral and subcentral zone. An increase in nucleolussize and a higher degree of pyroninophilia in the peripheralzone was also observed, indicating a localized promotion ofRNA synthesis. A higher rate of leaf initiation and a stimulationof leaf and stem growth was subse quentiy recorded. The growthof axillary meristems and of bud primordia was promoted onlyat the lower concentration of kinetin (1•^10–4 M),in both photoperiodically-induced and non-induced plants. However,the pattern of lateral bud growth differed from that found innormal floral differentiation. In kinetintreated plants, thebud primordia are isolated from the summit of the shoot apexby a succession of rapidly growing leaves. The enhancement ofleaf growth leads to correlative inhibition of axillary budpriniordia and results, finally, in a suppression of floraldifferentiation. The inhibitory effect of kinetin on floweringwas compared with that of auxin. Inhibition of flowering occurredin both cases but is achieved in two different ways.     

Are red leaves photosynthetically active?

At irradiances close to those representing a sunny day, red and green leaves of poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) showed only minor differences in their photosynthetic capacities despite the strong differences in their pigment composition. However, contrarily to green leaves, red leaves did not show inhibition of photosynthesis at high irradiances, because anthocyanins protected chloroplasts from photoinhibition.     

Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds

One of the first and most enduring roles identified for the plant hormone auxin is the mediation of apical dominance. Many reports have claimed that reduced stem indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) levels and/or reduced basipetal IAA transport directly or indirectly initiate bud growth in decapitated plants. We have tested whether auxin inhibits the initial stage of bud release, or subsequent stages, in garden pea (Pisum sativum) by providing a rigorous examination of the dynamics of auxin level, auxin transport, and axillary bud growth. We demonstrate that after decapitation, initial bud growth occurs prior to changes in IAA level or transport in surrounding stem tissue and is not prevented by an acropetal supply of exogenous auxin. We also show that auxin transport inhibitors cause a similar auxin depletion as decapitation, but do not stimulate bud growth within our experimental time-frame. These results indicate that decapitation may trigger initial bud growth via an auxin-independent mechanism. We propose that auxin operates after this initial stage, mediating apical dominance via autoregulation of buds that are already in transition toward sustained growth.