Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells

BACKGROUND: To test current models for how unattached and untense kinetochores prevent Cdc20 activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) throughout the spindle and the cytoplasm, we used GFP fusions and live-cell imaging to quantify the abundance and dynamics of spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1, Mad2, Bub1, BubR1, Mps1, and Cdc20 at kinetochores during mitosis in living PtK2 cells. RESULTS: Unattached kinetochores in prometaphase bound on average only a small fraction (estimated at 500-5000 molecules) of the total cellular pool of each spindle checkpoint protein. Measurements of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) showed that GFP-Cdc20 and GFP-BubR1 exhibit biphasic exponential kinetics at unattached kinetochores, with approximately 50% displaying very fast kinetics (t1/2 of approximately 1-3 s) and approximately 50% displaying slower kinetics similar to the single exponential kinetics of GFP-Mad2 and GFP-Bub3 (t1/2 of 21-23 s). The slower phase of GFP-Cdc20 likely represents complex formation with Mad2 since it was tension insensitive and, unlike the fast phase, it was absent at metaphase kinetochores that lack Mad2 but retain Cdc20 and was absent at unattached prometaphase kinetochores for the Cdc20 derivative GFP-Cdc20delta1-167, which lacks the major Mad2 binding domain but retains kinetochore localization. GFP-Mps1 exhibited single exponential kinetics at unattached kinetochores with a t1/2 of approximately 10 s, whereas most GFP-Mad1 and GFP-Bub1 were much more stable components. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support catalytic models of checkpoint activation where Mad1 and Bub1 are mainly resident, Mad2 free of Mad1, BubR1 and Bub3 free of Bub1, Cdc20, and Mps1 dynamically exchange as part of the diffuse wait-anaphase signal; and Mad2 interacts with Cdc20 at unattached kinetochores.     

Evidence for lack of damage during photobleaching measurements of the lateral mobility of cell surface components.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments to measure the mobility of cell surface components require a brief, but intense, pulse of light to photobleach the fluorescence in a restricted area of the cell. We studied possible photodamage to the cell surface during the photobleaching step using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and various FRAP measurements themselves. The cell membrane was left impermeable to trypan blue after photobleaching. SEM studies show that the morphology of the cell surface is not altered by photobleaching. Cells can be repeatedly photobleached and/or photobleached using longer bleach times and greater intensities without systematically altering FRAP kinetics. Singlet oxygen quenchers or free radical traps designed to inhibit putative photoreagents produced during photobleaching do not markedly affect the results. Fluorescein and rhodamine labels give similar results. All of these results, obtained with several different monolayer cultures, suggest that photodamage induced during photobleaching is not a serious artefact in the cellular FRAP results obtained to date.     

Vascular Endothelial-Cadherin Stabilizes at Cell–Cell Junctions by Anchoring to Circumferential Actin Bundles through α- and β-Catenins in Cyclic AMP-Epac-Rap1 Signal-activated Endothelial Cells

Vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin is a cell–cell adhesion molecule involved in endothelial barrier functions. Previously, we reported that cAMP-Epac-Rap1 signal enhances VE-cadherin–dependent cell adhesion. Here, we further scrutinized how cAMP-Epac-Rap1 pathway promotes stabilization of VE-cadherin at the cell–cell contacts. Forskolin induced circumferential actin bundling and accumulation of VE-cadherin fused with green fluorescence protein (VEC-GFP) on the bundled actin filaments. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analyses using VEC-GFP revealed that forskolin stabilizes VE-cadherin at cell–cell contacts. These effects of forskolin were mimicked by an activator for Epac but not by that for protein kinase A. Forskolin-induced both accumulation and stabilization of junctional VEC-GFP was impeded by latrunculin A. VE-cadherin, α-catenin, and β-catenin were dispensable for forskolin-induced circumferential actin bundling, indicating that homophilic VE-cadherin association is not the trigger of actin bundling. Requirement of α- and β-catenins for forskolin-induced stabilization of VE-cadherin on the actin bundles was confirmed by FRAP analyses using VEC-GFP mutants, supporting the classical model that α-catenin could potentially link the bundled actin to cadherin. Collectively, circumferential actin bundle formation and subsequent linkage between actin bundles and VE-cadherin through α- and β-catenins are important for the stabilization of VE-cadherin at the cell–cell contacts in cAMP-Epac-Rap1 signal-activated cells.     

A CENP-S/X complex assembles at the centromere in S and G2 phases of the human cell cycle

The functional identity of centromeres arises from a set of specific nucleoprotein particle subunits of the centromeric chromatin fibre. These include CENP-A and histone H3 nucleosomes and a novel nucleosome-like complex of CENPs -T, -W, -S and -X. Fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) revealed that human CENP-S and -X exist principally in complex in soluble form and retain proximity when assembled at centromeres. Conditional labelling experiments show that they both assemble de novo during S phase and G2, increasing approximately three- to fourfold in abundance at centromeres. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurements documented steady-state exchange between soluble and assembled pools, with CENP-X exchanging approximately 10 times faster than CENP-S (t_1/2 ∼ 10 min versus 120 min). CENP-S binding to sites of DNA damage was quite distinct, with a FRAP half-time of approximately 160 s. Fluorescent two-hybrid analysis identified CENP-T as a uniquely strong CENP-S binding protein and this association was confirmed by FRET, revealing a centromere-bound complex containing CENP-S, CENP-X and CENP-T in proximity to histone H3 but not CENP-A. We propose that deposition of the CENP-T/W/S/X particle reveals a kinetochore-specific chromatin assembly pathway that functions to switch centromeric chromatin to a mitosis-competent state after DNA replication. Centromeres shuttle between CENP-A-rich, replication-competent and H3-CENP-T/W/S/X-rich mitosis-competent compositions in the cell cycle.     

The bacterial cytoskeleton: in vivo dynamics of the actin-like protein Mbl of Bacillus subtilis

Mbl is a bacterial actin homolog that controls cell morphogenesis in Bacillus subtilis. A functional GFP-Mbl fusion protein was used to examine the behavior of the helical cables formed by Mbl protein in live B. subtilis cells. The cables undergo dynamic changes during cell cycle progression. They are stable but not rigid while elongating in parallel with cell growth, and they require septum formation to divide/cleave. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis showed that the cables are continuously remodeled during cell elongation. Turnover occurs along the length of the helical Mbl filaments, with no obvious polarity and a recovery half-time of about 8 min. These findings have important implications for the nature of bacterial cell wall architecture and synthesis.     

Improved FRAP Measurements on Biofilms

We expand the standard fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) model introduced by Axelrod et al. in 1976. Our goal is to capture some of the following common artifacts observed in the fluorescence measurements obtained with a confocal laser scanning microscope in biofilms: 1) linear drift, 2) exponential decrease (due to bleaching during the measurements), 3) stochastic Gaussian noise, and 4) uncertainty in the exact time point of the onset of fluorescence recovery. To fit the resulting stochastic model to data from FRAP measurements and to estimate all unknown model parameters, we apply a suitably adapted Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. In this way, a more accurate estimation of the diffusion coefficient of the fluorophore is achieved. The method was tested on data obtained from FRAP measurements on a cultivated biofilm.     

Regulation of TGF-β receptor hetero-oligomerization and signaling by endoglin

Complex formation among transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptors and its modulation by coreceptors represent an important level of regulation for TGF-β signaling. Oligomerization of ALK5 and the type II TGF-β receptor (TβRII) has been thoroughly investigated, both in vitro and in intact cells. However, such studies, especially in live cells, are missing for the endothelial cell coreceptor endoglin and for the ALK1 type I receptor, which enables endothelial cells to respond to TGF-β by activation of both Smad2/3 and Smad1/5/8. Here we combined immunoglobulin G–mediated immobilization of one cell-surface receptor with lateral mobility studies of a coexpressed receptor by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to demonstrate that endoglin forms stable homodimers that function as a scaffold for binding TβRII, ALK5, and ALK1. ALK1 and ALK5 bind to endoglin with differential dependence on TβRII, which plays a major role in recruiting ALK5 to the complex. Signaling data indicate a role for the quaternary receptor complex in regulating the balance between TGF-β signaling to Smad1/5/8 and to Smad2/3.     

CADM1 Is a Key Receptor Mediating Human Mast Cell Adhesion to Human Lung Fibroblasts and Airway Smooth Muscle Cells

Background

Mast cells (MCs) play a central role in the development of many diseases including asthma and pulmonary fibrosis. Interactions of human lung mast cells (HLMCs) with human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMCs) are partially dependent on adhesion mediated by cell adhesion molecule-1 (CADM1), but the adhesion mechanism through which HLMCs interact with human lung fibroblasts (HLFs) is not known. CADM1 is expressed as several isoforms (SP4, SP1, SP6) in HLMCs, with SP4 dominant. These isoforms differentially regulate HLMC homotypic adhesion and survival.

Objective

In this study we have investigated the role of CADM1 isoforms in the adhesion of HLMCs and HMC-1 cells to primary HASMCs and HLFs.

Methods

CADM1 overexpression or downregulation was achieved using adenoviral delivery of CADM1 short hairpin RNAs or isoform-specific cDNAs respectively.

Results

Downregulation of CADM1 attenuated both HLMC and HMC-1 adhesion to both primary HASMCs and HLFs. Overexpression of either SP1 or SP4 isoforms did not alter MC adhesion to HASMCs, whereas overexpression of SP4, but not SP1, significantly increased both HMC-1 cell and HLMC adhesion to HLFs. The expression level of CADM1 SP4 strongly predicted the extent of MC adhesion; linear regression indicated that CADM1 accounts for up to 67% and 32% of adhesion to HLFs for HMC-1 cells and HLMCs, respectively. HLFs supported HLMC proliferation and survival through a CADM1-dependent mechanism. With respect to CADM1 counter-receptor expression, HLFs expressed both CADM1 and nectin-3, whereas HASMCs expressed only nectin-3.

Conclusion and Clinical Relevance

Collectively these data indicate that the CADM1 SP4 isoform is a key receptor mediating human MC adhesion to HASMCs and HLFs. The differential expression of CADM1 counter-receptors on HLFs compared to HASMCs may allow the specific targeting of either HLMC-HLF or HLMC-HASMC interactions in the lung parenchyma and airways.     

LC3 fluorescent puncta in autophagosomes or in protein aggregates can be distinguished by FRAP analysis in living cells

LC3 is a marker protein that is involved in the formation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes, which are usually characterized and monitored by fluorescence microscopy using fluorescent protein-tagged LC3 probes (FP-LC3). FP-LC3 and even endogenous LC3 can also be incorporated into intracellular protein aggregates in an autophagy-independent manner. However, the dynamic process of LC3 associated with autophagosomes and autolysosomes or protein aggregates in living cells remains unclear. Here, we explored the dynamic properties of the two types of FP-LC3-containing puncta using fluorescence microscopy techniques, including fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). The FRAP data revealed that the fluorescent signals of FP-LC3 attached to phagophores or in mature autolysosomes showed either minimal or no recovery after photobleaching, indicating that the dissociation of LC3 from the autophagosome membranes may be very slow. In contrast, FP-LC3 in the protein aggregates exhibited nearly complete recovery (more than 80%) and rapid kinetics of association and dissociation (half-time < 1 sec), indicating a rapid exchange occurs between the aggregates and cytoplasmic pool, which is mainly due to the transient interaction of LC3 and SQSTM1/p62. Based on the distinct dynamic properties of FP-LC3 in the two types of punctate structures, we provide a convenient and useful FRAP approach to distinguish autophagosomes from LC3-involved protein aggregates in living cells. Using this approach, we find the FP-LC3 puncta that adjacently localized to the phagophore marker ATG16L1 were protein aggregate-associated LC3 puncta, which exhibited different kinetics compared with that of autophagic structures.     

Characterization of Cell Boundary and Confocal Effects Improves Quantitative FRAP Analysis

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is an important tool used by cell biologists to study the diffusion and binding kinetics of vesicles, proteins, and other molecules in the cytoplasm, nucleus, or cell membrane. Although many FRAP models have been developed over the past decades, the influence of the complex boundaries of 3D cellular geometries on the recovery curves, in conjunction with regions of interest and optical effects (imaging, photobleaching, photoswitching, and scanning), has not been well studied. Here, we developed a 3D computational model of the FRAP process that incorporates particle diffusion, cell boundary effects, and the optical properties of the scanning confocal microscope, and validated this model using the tip-growing cells of Physcomitrella patens. We then show how these cell boundary and optical effects confound the interpretation of FRAP recovery curves, including the number of dynamic states of a given fluorophore, in a wide range of cellular geometries—both in two and three dimensions—namely nuclei, filopodia, and lamellipodia of mammalian cells, and in cell types such as the budding yeast, Saccharomyces pombe, and tip-growing plant cells. We explored the performance of existing analytical and algorithmic FRAP models in these various cellular geometries, and determined that the VCell VirtualFRAP tool provides the best accuracy to measure diffusion coefficients. Our computational model is not limited only to these cells types, but can easily be extended to other cellular geometries via the graphical Java-based application we also provide. This particle-based simulation—called the Digital Confocal Microscopy Suite or DCMS—can also perform fluorescence dynamics assays, such as number and brightness, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, and raster image correlation spectroscopy, and could help shape the way these techniques are interpreted.     

Computation of FRAP recovery times for linker histone – chromatin binding on the basis of Brownian dynamics simulations

BackgroundFluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies can provide kinetic information about proteins in cells. Single point mutations can significantly affect the binding kinetics of proteins and result in variations in the recovery half time (t₅₀) measured in FRAP experiments. FRAP measurements of linker histone (LH) proteins in the cell nucleus have previously been reported by Brown et al. (2006) and Lele et al. (2006).MethodsWe performed Brownian dynamics (BD) simulations of the diffusional association of the wild-type and 38 single or double point mutants of the globular domain of mouse linker histone H1.0 (gH1.0) to a nucleosome. From these simulations, we calculated the bimolecular association rate constant (k_on), the Gibbs binding free energy (ΔG) and the dissociation rate constant (k_off) related to formation of a diffusional encounter complex between the nucleosome and the gH1.0.ResultsWe used these parameters, after application of a correction factor to account for the effects of the crowded environment of the nucleus, to compute FRAP recovery times and curves that are in good agreement with previously published, experimentally measured FRAP recovery time courses.ConclusionsOur computational analysis suggests that BD simulations can be used to predict the relative effects of single point mutations on FRAP recovery times related to protein binding.General SignificanceBD simulations assist in providing a detailed molecular level interpretation of FRAP data.     

草鱼cadm2b基因的克隆及在成体组织中的表达分析

为研究CADMs（Cell adhesion molecules）在草鱼构建抵御病害感染的第一道防线中发挥的作用,用RT-PCR和RACE方法结合测序分析,在草鱼脑组织中检测到了该基因家族成员cadm2b基因的4条不同的cDNA全长序列。序列比对结果表明这4条全长cDNA在5'端的序列完全相同,在3'端的3个局部区域有不同片段的缺失。因此,可以确定这4条不同的mRNA是cadm2b的不同剪接体。这4条不同的剪接体被分别命名为cadm2b、cadm2bX2、cadm2bX3和cadm2bX6。cadm2b的cDNA序列全长1669 bp,开放阅读框（ORF）1203 bp,编码400个氨基酸。cadm2bX2的cDNA序列全长2783 bp,开放阅读框长1323 bp,编码440个氨基酸;cadm2bX3的cDNA序列全长2755 bp,开放阅读框1296 bp,编码431个氨基酸;cadm2bX6基因的cDNA序列全长2649 bp,开放阅读框1161 bp,编码386个氨基酸。根据碱基序列所进行的氨基酸序列和蛋白结构预测显示这4个CADM2b蛋白亚型都具有CADM家族保守的4个功能区,但其C端的蛋白结合位点存在差异。CADM2b具有近膜4.1蛋白结合位点和Ⅱ型PDZ蛋白结合位点,CADM2bX2、X3缺失了PDZ蛋白结合位点,而CADM2bX6则同时缺失4.1蛋白和PDZ蛋白的结合位点。实时定量RT-PCR检测结果显示cadm2b剪接突变体是该基因mRNA的主要形式。半定量RT-PCR和套式PCR实验检测结果表明cadm2b基因在草鱼成体脑中高水平表达,在肝、肾、心脏和肌肉组织中有微量表达。这种表达模式提示草鱼中CADM2b主要是由非免疫细胞,而不是由免疫肥大细胞合成分泌的细胞黏附因子,可能通过介导免疫肥大细胞与病原靶细胞的黏附而起非特异性抵御病害感染的作用。     

Demonstration of phycobilisome mobility by the time- and space-correlated fluorescence imaging of a cyanobacterial cell

The cell-wide mobility of PBSs was confirmed by synchronously monitoring the fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and the fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP). On the other hand, a fluorescence recovery was still observed even if PBSs were immobile (PBSs fixed on the membranes by betaine and isolated PBSs fixed on the agar plate) or PBS mobility was unobservable (cell wholly bleached). Furthermore, it was proved that some artificial factors were involved not only in FRAP but also in FLIP, including renaturation of the reversibly denatured proteins, laser scanning-induced fluorescence loss and photo-damage to the cell. With consideration of the fast renaturation component in fluorescence recovery, the diffusion coefficient was estimated to be tenfold smaller than that without the component. Moreover, it was observed that the fluorescence intensity on the bleached area was always lower than that on the non-bleached area, even after 20 min, while it should be equal if PBSs were mobile freely. Based on the increasing proportion of the PBSs anti-washed to Triton X-100 (1%) with prolonged laser irradiation to the cells locked in light state 1 by PBQ, it was concluded that some PBSs became immobile due to photo-linking to PSII.     

Demonstration of phycobilisome mobility by the time- and space-correlated fluorescence imaging of a cyanobacterial cell

The cell-wide mobility of PBSs was confirmed by synchronously monitoring the fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and the fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP). On the other hand, a fluorescence recovery was still observed even if PBSs were immobile (PBSs fixed on the membranes by betaine and isolated PBSs fixed on the agar plate) or PBS mobility was unobservable (cell wholly bleached). Furthermore, it was proved that some artificial factors were involved not only in FRAP but also in FLIP, including renaturation of the reversibly denatured proteins, laser scanning-induced fluorescence loss and photo-damage to the cell. With consideration of the fast renaturation component in fluorescence recovery, the diffusion coefficient was estimated to be tenfold smaller than that without the component. Moreover, it was observed that the fluorescence intensity on the bleached area was always lower than that on the non-bleached area, even after 20 min, while it should be equal if PBSs were mobile freely. Based on the increasing proportion of the PBSs anti-washed to Triton X-100 (1%) with prolonged laser irradiation to the cells locked in light state 1 by PBQ, it was concluded that some PBSs became immobile due to photo-linking to PSII.     

Photobleaching approaches to investigate diffusional mobility and trafficking of Ras in living cells

Recent advances in our understanding of the intracellular trafficking, membrane microenvironment, and subcellular sites of signaling of Ras have been driven by observations of GFP-tagged Ras in living cells. Here, we describe methods to gain further insight into the regulation of these events through the use of quantitative fluorescence microscopy. We focus on three techniques, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP), and selective photobleaching. While all of these techniques exploit photobleaching as a tool to monitor protein dynamics, they each provide a unique subset of information. In particular, FRAP provides measurements of protein mobility via lateral diffusion by monitoring recovery of fluorescence into a region following a single photobleaching event. FLIP assesses the level of continuity and communication between subcellular compartments by repetitively photobleaching a region of interest and following concomitant loss of fluorescence from other areas in the cell. Selective photobleaching reveals kinetic information about active and passive transport of proteins into organelles such as the Golgi complex or between areas of protein enrichment such as caveolae. We describe how to implement these techniques using commercially available confocal microscopes and outline methods for data analysis. Finally, we discuss how these approaches are being used to provide new insights into the mechanisms of membrane microdomain localization, vesicular versus non-vesicular transport, and kinetics of exchange of Ras on and off of cell membranes.     

In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics

BACKGROUND: Mad1 and Mad2 are constituents of the spindle-assembly checkpoint, a device coupling the loss of sister-chromatid cohesion at anaphase to the completion of microtubule attachment of the sister chromatids at metaphase. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed that the interaction of cytosolic Mad2 with kinetochores is highly dynamic, suggesting a mechanism of catalytic activation of Mad2 at kinetochores followed by its release in a complex with Cdc20. The recruitment of cytosolic Mad2 to kinetochores has been attributed to a stable receptor composed of a distinct pool of Mad2 tightly bound to Mad1. Whether specifically this interaction accounts for the kinetochore dynamics of Mad2 is currently unknown. RESULTS: To gain a precise molecular understanding of the interaction of Mad2 with kinetochores, we reconstituted the putative Mad2 kinetochore receptor and developed a kinetochore recruitment assay with purified components. When analyzed by FRAP in vitro, this system faithfully reproduced the previously described in vivo dynamics of Mad2, providing an unequivocal molecular account of the interaction of Mad2 with kinetochores. Using the same approach, we dissected the mechanism of action of p31(comet), a spindle-assembly checkpoint inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro FRAP is a widely applicable approach to dissecting the molecular bases of the interaction of a macromolecule with an insoluble cellular scaffold. The combination of in vitro fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with additional fluorescence-based assays in vitro can be used to unveil mechanism, stoichiometry, and kinetic parameters of a macromolecular interaction, all of which are important for modeling protein interaction networks.     

Minimizing the impact of photoswitching of fluorescent proteins on FRAP analysis

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widely used imaging technique for measuring the mobility of fluorescently tagged proteins in living cells. Although FRAP presumes that high-intensity illumination causes only irreversible photobleaching, reversible photoswitching of many fluorescent molecules, including GFP, can also occur. Here, we show that this photoswitching is likely to contaminate many FRAPs of GFP, and worse, the size of its contribution can be up to 60% under different experimental conditions, making it difficult to compare FRAPs from different studies. We develop a procedure to correct FRAPs for photoswitching and apply it to FRAPs of the GFP-tagged histone H2B, which, depending on the precise photobleaching conditions exhibits apparent fast components ranging from 9-36% before correction and ～1% after correction. We demonstrate how this ～1% fast component of H2B-GFP can be used as a benchmark both to estimate the role of photoswitching in previous FRAP studies of TATA binding proteins (TBP) and also as a tool to minimize the contribution of photoswitching to tolerable levels in future FRAP experiments. In sum, we show how the impact of photoswitching on FRAP can be identified, minimized, and corrected.     

Tumor suppressor cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1) is cleaved by a disintegrin and metalloprotease 10 (ADAM10) and subsequently cleaved by γ-secretase complex

Cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1) is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in various tissues. CADM1 is a cell adhesion molecule with many functions, including roles in tumor suppression, apoptosis, mast cell survival, synapse formation, and spermatogenesis. CADM1 undergoes membrane-proximal cleavage called shedding, but the sheddase and mechanisms of CADM1 proteolysis have not been reported. We determined the cleavage site involved in CADM1 shedding by LC/MS/MS and showed that CADM1 shedding occurred in the membrane fraction and was inhibited by tumor necrosis factor-α protease inhibitor-1 (TAPI-1). An siRNA experiment revealed that ADAM10 mediates endogenous CADM1 shedding. In addition, the membrane-bound fragment generated by shedding was further cleaved by γ-secretase and generated CADM1-intracellular domain (ICD) in a mechanism called regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP). These results clarify the detailed mechanism of membrane-proximal cleavage of CADM1, suggesting the possibility of RIP-mediated CADM1 signaling.