蜘蛛的性二型现象及其进化

对蜘蛛的性二型现象进行了初步的概括,并试图以食物对种群繁衍的影响为线索说明其进化机制。蜘蛛的性二型现象主要表现在体形大小上,一般雌性大于雄性;食物的数量和分布制约着蜘蛛性二型现象的进化。     

蜘蛛的饲养与管理

简明介绍室内饲养蜘蛛的方法和应注意的问题,包括饲养器具,食物及生活史观察等。     

江西南矶湿地斑背大尾莺食性初步分析

为了填补斑背大尾莺食性研究的空白和比较其繁殖期和非繁殖期是否有食性差异,于2011年4月繁殖期,在江西南矶湿地用望远镜观察和录像机拍摄斑背大尾莺亲鸟育雏行为,记录育雏食物的种类和数量;在11月秋季非繁殖期,斑背大尾莺专项环志过程中采集7只意外死亡的个体,进行实验室胃容物解剖分析。两种分析方法分别得出:1)春季取食动物性食物,主要有直翅目蝼蛄科成虫或幼虫、鳞翅目成虫或幼虫、蜻蜓目的成虫,蛛形纲的小型蜘蛛;2)秋季食物由动物性食物(70.24%)和植物性食物(29.76%)组成,动物性食物主要为鞘翅目、直翅目、蜻蜓目、鳞翅目、蜘蛛目等节肢动物,植物性食物为一些植物种子和少量的叶片组织。本研究表明,繁殖期和非繁殖期斑背大尾莺食性有差异,这种差异性是随季节变化生境中的食物组成不同,及育雏期雏鸟需高蛋白营养食物而导致的。     

奇特笑脸阻吓天敌

据英国《每日邮报》报道,美国夏威夷的丛林中生活着一种奇特的“笑脸蜘蛛”。这种蜘蛛腹部背面最普通的图案是亮黄色,呈现出笑脸。其他蜘蛛的图案非常复杂,除人类面孔之外,还有如卵一般大小的斑块点缀在腹部。虽然呈现的图案各异,但它们都源自同一物种。科学家们认为,这种笑脸图案是由于基因的自然变异形成的,同时也受到所吃食物的影响,     

杂色山雀繁殖期与非繁殖期食物组成及利用

食物资源是动物赖以生存的重要物质基础和能量来源。研究鸟类不同时期的食物选择和利用对于了解该物种取食行为的可塑性和生态适应性将具有重要意义。本文于2012年4月至2013年10月,通过取食行为观察、育雏分析和投食实验来研究杂色山雀(Parus varius)繁殖期与非繁殖的食物组成及利用的差别。结果发现,杂色山雀繁殖期与非繁殖期存在显著的食物差别,繁殖期完全取食动物性食物,而非繁殖期则以植物性食物为主,兼食少量昆虫。繁殖期成鸟取食的食物主要为鳞翅目、蜘蛛目、鞘翅目、双翅目以及少量的直翅目、异翅亚目以及膜翅目动物,育雏的食物资源主要为鳞翅目幼虫(67.86%),其次为蜘蛛目、鳞翅目成虫、膜翅目以及鞘翅目幼虫和少量直翅目,但与成鸟的食物存在显著区别,特别是鳞翅目幼虫的比例极高。非繁殖期的食物主要以植物种子(48.91%)和浆果为主(51.09%),其中,浆果的比例较高,对16种潜在食物资源的取食选择也证明对浆果类食物具有较明显的偏爱。杂色山雀不同时期的食物差别和食性的可塑性可能是由于食物供给和能量需求的季节性变化造成的,但对于自然生境中各种食物资源丰富度的季节性变化,及对杂色山雀取食选择的影响还需进一步研究。     

坝上地区农田及两种恢复生境中蜘蛛多样性与群落特征

蜘蛛是农田生态系统中重要的自然天敌,其生物多样性及群落特征直接决定了农田的害虫控制等生态系统服务功能质量。农田及其周边的恢复生境是蜘蛛重要的栖息地。本研究采用陷阱法,对河北省张家口市崇礼区871、1360、1635 m 3个海拔农田、自然恢复草地及人工修复林地的蜘蛛群落的物种组成、物种多样性和功能特征进行研究,分析不同恢复生境中蜘蛛群落特征。结果表明: 不同生境蜘蛛的物种多样性指数差异明显,人工修复林地蜘蛛的多度为124.3只,显著高于自然恢复草地(70.1)及农田(38.6)的蜘蛛多度;人工修复林地(16.3)与自然恢复草地(21.4)的物种丰富度没有显著差别,但均显著高于农田(8.9);人工修复林地(2.04)及自然恢复草地(2.05)的Shannon多样性指数差异不显著,且均显著高于农田(1.55)。3种生境的蜘蛛群落组成均具有显著差异;蜘蛛体长与蜘蛛捕猎类型呈正相关,大型蜘蛛倾向于通过捕猎获取食物;自然恢复草地与农田蜘蛛以游猎型为主,而人工修复林地倾向于拥有更多的结网型蜘蛛,高海拔地区的蜘蛛体积通常较小。自然恢复草地与人工修复林地均可以提升蜘蛛群落多样性,在区域生物多样性保护中起重要作用;不同生境蜘蛛群落组成出现了显著分化,即蜘蛛群落总体的功能特征发生改变和保留了部分生境特有种。2种恢复生境蜘蛛多样性指标优于农田生境,且2种恢复生境物种组成存在差异,均具有保护特有种的功能,研究结果对农田及区域尺度蜘蛛生物多样性保护与恢复具有指导意义。     

胎生蜥蜴的捕食行为及其食性分析

通过直接观察和胃容物分析对胎生蜥蜴（lacerta vivipara）的捕食行为和食性进行了研究。结果表明,胎生蜥蜴的捕食过程包括觅食、攻击前行为、攻击行为、猎物处死、吞食、食后清洁共6个主要步骤。在6～10月间,胎生蜥蜴的食谱中以昆虫和蜘蛛最多;不同月份的食物种类和数量不同;食物中以个体长为1～10mm食物数量频率最高;食物组成与生活环境中的无脊椎动物种类有极显著的相关。雌、雄体的食物生态位重叠度较高,而幼体和成体的食物生态位重叠度较低。     

动物的求偶喂食行为

动物的求偶喂食行为是雄性动物在求偶时向求偶对象奉献食物礼品的现象,这种行为在昆虫、蜘蛛和鸟类中最为常见。介绍了求偶喂食行为的概念,列举了一些实例,并讨论了这种行为的生物学功能和进化过程。     

蜘蛛的机械感器

蜘蛛的机械感器是最灵敏的机械感受器之一,文章从蜘蛛机械感器的分布、形状和功能、竖琴状感器的结构、感器神经元的电生理特性、机械感觉转导的位点、动作电位的起始位点、受体通道的性质、输出神经对感觉神经元的调控方面对蜘蛛机械感受器进行了介绍,并提出了有待进一步解决的问题。     

黄山茶林场夏季丝光椋鸟的食性分析

丝光椋鸟为我国南方的一种庭园鸟类,筑巢于房檐、屋嵴瓦片下的洞穴内。本文是作者于1981—1983年5月下旬至6月上旬,在黄山茶林场剖验16只鸟胃的研究成果。食物以昆虫为主,其中直翅目、鞘翅目、鳞翅目和半翅目等农林害虫,约占食物总量的61.66％;益虫仅占11.73％;此外还有蜘蛛等动物性食物约占15.95％;植物性食物以小构树果实为最多,仅在2只胃中发现。所以,该鸟为食虫鸟类,对农林有益。     

食物对三突花蛛生长发育的影响 Ⅱ.食物对三突花蛛营养指标的影响

研究不同食物对三突花蛛相对生长率(RGR)、相对取食量(RCR)、食物利用率(ECI)的影响。结果表明,三突花蛛各龄相对生长率以取食混合食物为高,取食单一食物为低。各龄相对取食量对棉铃虫和果蝇较高,对摇蚊则较低,食物利用率则以对摇蚊的利用率为最高,对棉铃虫和果蝇的利用率较低。     

悦目金蛛拖牵丝力学性能的变异

蜘蛛丝作为一种具有优良机械性能的天然动物蛋白纤维,其特有的结构和机械性能与其生物学功能密切相关。由大壶状腺纺出的拖牵丝在蜘蛛的行走、建网、捕食、逃生、繁殖等多种生命活动中均发挥了重要的功能,其机械性能会受到多种内外因素相互作用的影响。本文对在不同体重、不同猎物饲养和不同营养状态3种条件下人工抽出的悦目金蛛(Argiope amoena)拖牵丝与其不同单丝间的力学性能进行了比较研究。结果表明,悦目金蛛拖牵丝的力学性能在组间、组内不同个体,以及同一个体不同丝纤维间变异都较大。随着蜘蛛个体的增大,蛛丝横截面直径逐渐增大,这会使得蛛丝的力学性能更好,便于作为救命索的拖牵丝在遇到危险时承受蜘蛛体重;蜘蛛在经过1个月的饥饿后,蛛丝在屈服点附近的力学性能并未发生显著变化,而断裂点应变和断裂能均显著减小,同时也表明无论对于作为救命索还是网丝,拖牵丝的弹性形变性能在与蛛丝相关的微观进化中要优先于塑性形变。这是蜘蛛在能量摄入受到限制时对拖牵丝的投入权衡的结果。     

基于地统计学方法的稻田灰飞虱与蜘蛛时空动态分析

通过田间调查,用地统计学方法对灰飞虱Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén)及其重要天敌蜘蛛的时空动态进行了比较分析。通过变差函数模型的拟合及空间格局的分析,得出灰飞虱长翅成虫、若虫与蜘蛛的变程范围相近,结构性强度的范围相近,但同一时间灰飞虱与蜘蛛的变程和结构性强度则均不尽相同;灰飞虱若虫与蜘蛛自始至终为聚集分布,但灰飞虱长翅成虫与蜘蛛的分布型则有差异,在某些时间为均匀分布。用普通克立格方法作出空间分布图,在时间序列上进行比较分析,得出稻田蜘蛛与灰飞虱成若虫的空间分布均有相似性,尤其与若虫相似性更强,表现出比较明显的空间跟随现象,且空间跟随现象与灰飞虱虫量的消长有密切的关系,但是由于天气、稻田环境、灰飞虱其他天敌以及蜘蛛其他猎物的存在等因素的影响使得其空间跟随又有着相当的复杂性。     

黄褐新圆蛛生物学以及对棉虫的控制作用

黄褐新圆蛛在湖北省以初孵幼虫在卵袋内越冬,一年可完成三个世代。雌蛛交配一次可终生产受精卵,一生最多可产9个卵袋。每个卵袋含卵粒数一般为80—90粒,单雌产卵量平均在450粒以上,最多可产869粒。卵的孵化率在90％以上。 成蛛的寿命较长,温度和食物对寿命有较大影响;有较强的耐饥能力。 在棉田内以结网捕食害虫,可捕食棉铃虫、红铃虫、棉小造桥虫、小地老虎、棉二点叶蝉、棉大卷叶螟和大青叶蝉等害虫。     

Odor-based recognition of nectar in cursorial spiders

Carnivorous arthropods are known to rely on non‐prey foods, such as honeydew, pollen, and nectar. Consumption of plant‐based nutrients by spiders also appears to be widespread, especially in cursorial species. This is not surprising, as studies have shown that these spiders’ activity levels, survivorship, and reproduction are increased when their diet includes plant‐based nutrients, especially under conditions of prey scarcity. However, the sensory and behavioral means by which they recognize and locate non‐prey food is unknown. Here we show that immatures of a nectarivorous spider [Hibana futilis Banks (Araneae: Anyphaenidae)] can recognize and remember particular chemical stimuli associated with nectar. Following ingestion of minute amounts of sugar, these spiders exhibited counterturning and other local searching behaviors that increased their chances of finding more nectar. When placed on test arenas, spiders that were naïve with respect to nectar aroma located artificial nectaries composed of diluted honey significantly faster than unscented nectaries composed of 1 m sucrose solution. These results indicate that H. futilis is neurophysiologically and behaviorally adapted for recognizing olfactory stimuli. Interestingly, only spiders that ingested sugar and were engaged in local search responded to nectar aroma, suggesting that stimulation into local search is necessary to prime olfactory responses. We found that H. futilis could be conditioned to associate the presence of nectar with a novel aroma, in this case vanilla, and remember this aroma over the course of several hours. In arenas with vanilla‐scented nectaries, spiders that had previous experience feeding on vanilla‐scented sucrose droplets located the nectaries significantly faster than did vanilla‐naïve spiders. The capacity to remember specific aromas could enhance the spiders’ ability to find nectar, either when moving between different parts of the same plant or among different plant species. The results here indicate that nectarivorous spiders possess the sensory capabilities and programed behaviors necessary for efficient detection, recognition, and location of nectar sources.     

Diet of the golden-tipped bat Kerivoula papuensis (Microchiroptera) from north-eastern New South Wales, Australia

The diet of the golden-tipped bat ( Kerivoula papuensis ) was investigated by collecting faecal samples from captured individuals in the Richmond Range State Forest, north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Faecal analysis was used so that all captured individuals could be released after processing and banding. A total of 53 faecal pellets were collected in the summer and autumn months from 39 individuals. The major food of K. papuensis were spiders (Araneida) comprising 91.9% of the total volume of food. Other foods consumed in small quantities were Coleoptera, Lepidoptera and Diptera.     

鳄蜥捕食蜥蜴和蛇的现象

鳄蜥(Shinisaurus crocodilurus)主要捕食部分昆虫、蜘蛛、蚯蚓、小型蛙类和小鱼等,但尚未见报道鳄蜥捕食其他相对较大的动物。本文报道了鳄蜥捕食变色树蜥(Calotesversicolor)和翠青蛇(Cyclophiopsmajor)的现象,以全事件记录法观察分析了鳄蜥猎捕这两种爬行动物的行为过程。这次新发现说明鳄蜥食谱较广,具有捕食蜥蜴等个体偏大动物的能力。因此,我们建议在饲养繁育中投喂更多类型的食物以避免营养不良。     

The effect of hunger level on predation dynamics in the spider Nesticodes rufipes: a functional response study

It is well known that a predator has the potential to regulate a prey population only if the predator responds to increases in prey density and inflicts greater mortality rates. Predators may cause such density-dependent mortality depending on the nature of the functional and numerical responses. As spiders are usually faced with a shortage of prey, the killing behavior of the spider Nesticodes rufipes at varying densities of Musca domestica was examined here through laboratory functional response experiments where spiders were deprived of food for 5 (well-fed) or 20 days (hungry). An additional laboratory experiment was also carried out to assess handling time of spiders. The number of prey killed by spiders over 24- and 168-h periods of predator–prey interaction was recorded. Logistic regression analyses revealed the type II functional response for both well-fed and hungry spiders. We found that the lower predation of hungry spiders during the first hours of experimentation was offset later by an increase in predation (explained by estimated handling times), resulting in similarity of functional response curves for well-fed and hungry spiders. It was also observed that the higher number of prey killed by well-fed spiders over a 24-h period of spider–prey interaction probably occurred due to their greater weights than hungry spiders. We concluded that hungry spiders may be more voracious than well-fed spiders only over longer time periods, since hungry spiders may spend more time handling their first prey items than well-fed spiders.     

Choosing hunting sites with little information: patch-choice responses of crab spiders to distant cues

Adult female crab spiders (Misumena valid) released in a meadowmoved to milkweed stems more often than to other sites and alsomoved to flowering milkweed stems more often than to equallyavailable nonflowering ones. Preferences of the spiders as apopulation were similar during initial and second trials, butgiven individuals did not repeat their initial choices moreoften than predicted by chance. Thus, spiders probably respondeddirectly to cues present, rather than to information retainedfrom earlier experience. Spiders placed at the base of floweringmilkweed stems did not choose these sites more often than predictedby chance or more often than did spiders released in the grass,suggesting that this increase in localization provided no additionalinformation for choosing a hunting site. However, spiders placedat the bases of nonflowering stems selected them less oftenthan predicted. Second trials with these spiders also resembledinitial trials, but, as with the spiders released in the grass,given individuals did not repeat their initial performance moreoften than predicted. Thus, spiders released in the grass probablyresponded directly to cues present, as did spiders releasedat the base of stems. The choices of these spiders, combinedwith flexible giving-up times, caused the spiders to be concentratedon flowering stems. Although this strategy results in a better-than-randompattern of selecting hunting sites, the spiders lose considerableforaging time in the process.