Development of the jamming avoidance response and its morphological correlates in the gymnotiform electric fish, Eigenmannia.

The electric fish, Eigenmannia, will smoothly shift the frequency of its electric organ discharge away from an interfering electric signal. This shift in frequency is called the jamming avoidance response (JAR). In this article, we analyze the behavioral development of the JAR and the anatomical development of structures critical for the performance of the JAR. The JAR first appears when juvenile Eigenmannia are approximately 1 month old, at a total length of 13-18 mm. We have found that the establishment of much of the sensory periphery and of central connections precedes the onset of the JAR. We describe three aspects of the behavioral development of the JAR: (a) the onset and development of the behavior is closely correlated with size, not age; (b) the magnitude (in Hz) of the JAR increases with size until the juveniles display values within the adult range (10-20 Hz) at a total length of 25-30 mm; and (3) the JAR does not require prior experience or exposure to electrical signals. Raised in total electrical isolation from the egg stage, animals tested at a total length of 25 mm performed a correct JAR when first exposed to the stimulus. We examine the development of anatomical areas important for the performance of the JAR: the peripheral electrosensory system (mechano- and electroreceptors and peripheral nerves); and central electrosensory pathways and nuclei [the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL), the lateral lemniscus, the torus semicircularis, and the pace-maker nucleus]. The first recognizable structures in the developing electrosensory system are the peripheral neurites of the anterior lateral line nerve. The afferent nerves are established by day 2, which is prior to the formation of receptors in the epidermis. Thus, the neurites wait for their targets. This sequence of events suggests that receptor formation may be induced by innervation of primordial cells within the epidermis. Mechanoreceptors are first formed between day 3 and 4, while electroreceptors are first formed on day 7. Electroreceptor multiplication is observed for the first time at an age of 25 days and correlates with the onset of the JAR. The somata of the anterior lateral line nerve ganglion project afferents out to peripheral electroreceptors and also send axons centrally into the ELL. The first electroreceptive axons invade the ELL by day 6, and presumably a rough somatotopic organization and segmentation within the ELL may arise as early as day 7. Axonal projections from the ELL to the torus develop after day 18.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Effects of global electrosensory signals on motion processing in the midbrain of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eigenmannia</Emphasis>

Wave-type weakly electric fish such as Eigenmannia produce continuous sinusoidal electric fields. When conspecifics are in close proximity, interaction of these electric fields can produce deficits in electrosensory function. We examined a neural correlate of such jamming at the level of the midbrain. Previous results indicate that neurons in the dorsal layers of the torus semicircularis can (1) respond to jamming signals, (2) respond to moving electrosensory stimuli, and (3) receive convergent information from the four sensory maps of the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL). In this study we recorded the intracellular responses of both tuberous and ampullary neurons to moving objects. Robust Gaussian-shaped or sinusoidal responses with half-height durations between 55 ms and 581 ms were seen in both modalities. The addition of ongoing global signals with temporal-frequencies of 5 Hz attenuated the responses to the moving object by 5 dB or more. In contrast, the responses to the moving object were not attenuated by the addition of signals with temporal frequencies of 20 Hz or greater. This occurred in both the ampullary and tuberous systems, despite the fact that the ampullary afferents to the torus originate in a single ELL map whereas the tuberous afferents emerge from three maps.     

The coding of signals in the electric communication of the gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia: From electroreceptors to neurons in the torus semicircularis of the midbrain

Summary In the context of aggression and courtship, Eigenmannia repeatedly interrupts its electric organ discharges (EODs) These interruptions (Fig. 1) contain low-frequency components as well as high-frequency transients and, therefore, stimulate ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, respectively (Figs. 2, 3). Information provided by these two classes of receptors is relayed along separate pathways, via the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) of the hindbrain, to the dorsal torus semicircularis (TSd) of the midbrain. Some neurons of the torus receive inputs from both types of receptors (Figs. 14, 15), and some respond predominantly to EOD interruptions while being rather insensitive to other forms of signal modulations (Figs. 12, 13). This high selectivity appears to result from convergence and gating of inputs from individually less selective neurons.Abbreviations CP central posterior thalamic nucleus - Df frequency difference between neighbor's EOD and fish's own - DPn dorsal posterior nucleus (thalamus) - EOD electric organ discharge - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - JAR jamming avoidance response - LMR lateral mesencephalic reticular formation - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nEb nucleus electrosensorius, beat-related area - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing rise of EOD frequency - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing fall of EOD frequency - nEar nucleus electrosensorius-acusticolateralis area - NPd nucleus praeeminentialis, pars dorsalis - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - PT pretectal nucleus - SE nucleus subelectrosensorius - TeO optic tectum - TSd dorsal (electrosensory) torus semicircularis - TSv ventral (mechano-sensory and auditory) torus semicircularis     

Distribution of Kv1-like potassium channels in the electromotor and electrosensory systems of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus

The electromotor and electrosensory systems of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus are model systems for studying mechanisms of high-frequency motor pattern generation and sensory processing. Voltage-dependent ionic currents, including low-threshold potassium currents, influence excitability of neurons in these circuits and thereby regulate motor output and sensory filtering. Although Kv1-like potassium channels are likely to carry low-threshold potassium currents in electromotor and electrosensory neurons, the distribution of Kv1 alpha subunits in A. leptorhynchus is unknown. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry with six different antibodies raised against specific mammalian Kv1 alpha subunits (Kv1.1-Kv1.6) to characterize the distribution of Kv1-like channels in electromotor and electrosensory structures. Each Kv1 antibody labeled a distinct subset of neurons, fibers, and/or dendrites in electromotor and electrosensory nuclei. Kv1-like immunoreactivity in the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) and pacemaker nucleus are particularly relevant in light of previous studies suggesting that potassium currents carried by Kv1 channels regulate neuronal excitability in these regions. Immunoreactivity of pyramidal cells in the ELL with several Kv1 antibodies is consistent with Kv1 channels carrying low-threshold outward currents that regulate spike waveform in these cells (Fernandez et al., J Neurosci 2005;25:363-371). Similarly, Kv1-like immunoreactivity in the pacemaker nucleus is consistent with a role of Kv1 channels in spontaneous high-frequency firing in pacemaker neurons. Robust Kv1-like immunoreactivity in several other structures, including the dorsal torus semicircularis, tuberous electroreceptors, and the electric organ, indicates that Kv1 channels are broadly expressed and are likely to contribute significantly to generating the electric organ discharge and processing electrosensory inputs.     

Orientation in the dark: brain circuits involved in the perception of electric signals in mormyrid electric fish.

Weakly electric fish produce electric signals with a specialised organ in their tail. In addition, they are electrosensitive and can perceive their self-generated signals (for electrolocation) and electric signals of other electric fishes (for electrocommunication). Mormyrids possess three types of peripheral electroreceptor organs, one used for electrocommunication and two types involved in electolocation. They are innervated by afferent fibres, which project to different zones in the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) in the medulla. Brain circuits for electrolocation and electrocommunication are separated almost throughout the whole brain. Electrolocation pathways run from the ELL-cortex to the torus semicircularis of the midbrain and then via the valvula cerebelli towards the telencephalon. Pathways involved in electrocommunication run from the nucleus of the ELL to another part of the torus and from there through the isthmic granule nucleus to the valvula. In addition, a pathway via the preglomerular complex to the telencephalon might exist. In both the electrolocation and the electrocommunication circuits, prominent recurrent pathways are present.     

An internal current source yields immunity of electrosensory information processing to unusually strong jamming in electric fish

Summary The electric organ of a fish represents an internal current source, and the largely isopotential nature of the body interior warrants that the current associated with the fish's electric organ discharges (EODs) recruits all electroreceptors on the fish's body surface evenly. Currents associated with the EODs of a neighbor, however, will not penetrate all portions of the fish's body surface equally and will barely affect regions where the neighbor's current flows tangentially to the skin surface. The computational mechanisms of the jamming avoidance response (JAR) in Eigenmannia exploit the uneven effects of a neighbor's EOD current to calculate the correct frequency difference between the two interfering EOD signals even if the amplitude of a neighbor's signal surpasses that of the fish's own signal by orders of magnitude. The particular geometry of the fish's own EOD current thus yields some immunity against the potentially confusing effects of unusually strong interfering EOD currents of neighbors.Abbreviations DF frequency difference - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response     

Differential distribution of ampullary and tuberous processing in the torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia

Summary Gymnotiform electric fish sense low-and high frequency electric signals with ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, respectively. We employed intracellular recording and labeling methods to investigate ampullary and tuberous information processing in laminae 1–5 of the dorsal torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia. Ampullary afferents arborized extensively in laminae 1–3 and, in some cases, lamina 7. Unlike tuberous afferents to the torus, ampullary afferents had numerous varicosities along their finest-diameter branches. Neurons that were primarily ampullary were found in lamina 3. Neurons primarily excited by tuberous stimuli were found in lamina 5 and, more rarely, in lamina 4. Cells that had dendrites in lamina 1–3 and 5 could be recruited by both ampullary and tuberous stimuli. These bimodal cells were found in lamina 4. During courtship, Eigenmannia produces interruptions of its electric organ discharges. These interruptions stimulate ampullary and tuberous receptors. The integration of ampullary and tuberous information may be important in the processing of these communication signals.Abbreviations JAR jamming avoidance response - EOD electric organ discharge - S1 sinusoidal signal mimicking fish's EOD - S2 jamming signal - Df frequency difference (S2-S1) or between a neighbor's EODs and fish's own EODs - CNS central nervous system     

A new electroreceptive teleost:Xenomystus nigri (Osteoglossiformes: Notopteridae)

Summary The African knife fish,Xenomystus nigri, is found to be sensitive to weak electric fields by the method of averaged evoked potentials from the brain. Slow waves and spikes were recorded in or near the lateral line area of the medulla and the torus semicircularis of the mesencephalon in response to long pulses (best > 50 ms) and low frequency sine waves (best ca. 10 Hz) of voltage gradients down to < 10 V/cm. Evoked waves in the lateral line area are a sequence of negative and positive deflections beginning with a first peak at ca. 24 ms; in the torus semicircularis the first peak is at ca. 37 ms. Spikes are most likely in the torus between 50 and 80 ms after ON. At each recording locus there is a best axis of the homogeneous electric field and a better polarity. Effects of stimulus intensity, duration and repetition are described. The physiological properties are similar to those of ampullary receptor systems in mormyriforms, gymnotiforms and siluriforms.Confirming Braford (1982),Xenomystus has a large medullary nucleus resembling the nucleus otherwise peculiar to mormyriforms, gymnotiforms and siluriforms and now called the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELLL; formerly the posterior lateral line lobe). We describe the projections of anterior and posterior lateral line nerves by HRP applied to the proximal stump of a cut nerve. A descending central ramus of the anterior lateral line nerve and a lateral component of the ascending ramus of the posterior lateral line nerve end in part in the ELLL.Electroreception, including the system of discrete central structures mediating it, is for the first time found to be less than an ordinal or even a family character, but apparently a characteristic of the subfamily Xenomystinae. Species of the other subfamily, Notopterinae as well as of the other families of osteoglossiforms (Osteoglossidae, Hiodontidae and Pantodontidae), lack the ELLL.Notopterus andPantodon are found to lack the evoked potential.The positive finding of evoked activity to feeble electric field is found to be the most practical method for searching widely among fishes for the presence of the electrosense modality and its central pathways. The anatomical criterion of an ELLL can now be taken to be a good criterion for the presence of this sensory system. The absence of evoked response correlates well with the absence of an ELLL.Abbreviations ELLL electrosensory lateral line lobe - HRP horseradish peroxidase - TS torus semicircularis     

Comparison of calbindin D 28K and cytochrome c oxidase in electrosensory nuclei of high- and low-frequency weakly electric fish (Gymnotiformes)

Summary Weakly electric fish (Gymnotiformes) emit quasi-sinusoidal electric organ discharges within speciesspecific frequency ranges. The electrosensory system is organized into 2 parallel pathways which convey either the amplitude or the timing of each electric organ discharge cycle. Two putative metabolic activity markers, calbindin D 28K and cytochrome c oxidase, and their relationship with the electrosensory nuclei of high- and low-frequency species were studied. Calbindin is found in the somata of the spherical neurons in the first-order electrosensory recipient nucleus, the electrosensory lateral-line lobe, and in layer VI of the midbrain's torus semicircularis, in Eigenmannia virescens, an intermediate-frequency species, and Apteronotus leptorhynchus, a high-frequency species. Calbindin immunoreactivity was completely absent in these nuclei in Sternopygus macrurus, a closely related, low-frequency species. Cytochrome c oxidase levels were inversely related to calbindin immunoreactivity since relatively high levels were observed in the electrosensory lateral-line lobe and torus semicircularis of S. macrurus but were absent in these nuclei in A. leptorhynchus. Our studies indicate that calbindin immunoreactivity is present in tonic, repetitively firing neurons with high frequencies.     

Postmetamorphic changes in auditory sensitivity of the bullfrog midbrain

During metamorphosis, the lateral line system of ranid frogs (Rana catesbeiana) degenerates and an auditory system sensitive to airborne sounds develops. We examined the onset of function and developmental changes in the central auditory system by recording multi-unit activity from the principal nucleus of the torus semicircularis (TSp) of bullfrogs at different postmetamorphic stages in response to tympanically-presented auditory stimuli. No responses were recorded to stimuli of up to 95 dB SPL from latemetamorphic tadpoles, but auditory responses were recorded within 24 hours of completion of metamorphosis. Audiograms from froglets (SVL < 5.5 cm) were relatively flat in shape with high thresholds, and showed a decrease in most sensitive frequency (MSF) from about 2500 Hz to about 1500 Hz throughout the first 7–10 days after completion of metamorphosis. Audiograms from frogs larger than 5.5 cm showed continuous downward shifts in MSF and thresholds, and increases in sharpness around MSF until reaching adult-like values. Spontaneous activity in the TSp increased throughout postmetamorphic development. The torus increased in volume by approximately 50% throughout development and displayed changes in cell density and nuclear organization. These observations suggest that the onset of sensitivity to tympanically presented airborne sounds is limited by peripheral, rather than central, auditory maturation.Abbreviations CF characteristic frequency - MSF most sensitive frequency - PB phasic burst - PL primary like - S sustained - SVL snout-vent length - TS torus semicircularis - TSl laminar nucleus of TS - TSm magnocellular nucleus of TS - TSp principal nucleus of TS - TW tympanic width     

A role of burst firings in encoding of spatiotemporally-varying stimulus

To investigate a role of burst firings of neurons in encoding of spatiotemporally-varying stimulus, we focus on electrosensory system of a weakly electric fish. Weakly electric fish generates electric field around its body using electric organ discharge and can accurately detect the location of an object using the modulation of electric field induced by the object. We developed a model of fish body by which we numerically describe the spatiotemporal patterns of electric field around the fish body. We also made neural models of electroreceptor distributed on the fish body and of electrosensory lateral-line lobe (ELL) to investigate what kinds of information of electric field distorted by an object they detect. Here we show that the spatiotemporal features of electric field around the fish body are encoded by the timing of burst firings of ELL neurons. The information of object distance is extracted by the area of synchronous firings of neurons in a higher nucleus, torus semicircularis.     

Responses of cells in the mormyrid electrosensory lobe to EODs with distorted waveforms: implications for capacitance detection

Mormyrid fish (Gnathonemus petersii) can discriminate between ohmic and capacitive electrical objects during active electrolocation. The neural basis of this ability was investigated by recording cells in the dorsolateraland medial zones of the electrosensory lobe. Natural electric organ discharges (EODs) distorted by capacitive objects and EODs with computer generated phase shifts were used as stimuli.Cells in the dorsolateral zone were very sensitive to phase shifted EODs with constant amplitude spectra. Phase shifts as small as 1 were effective. Cells in this zone also responded more to EODs with capacitance induced distortions than to non-distorted EODs. These effects were very similar to the effects on B-type primary afferents from mormyromast electroreceptors which project to this zone.Cells in the medial zone were not sensitive to phase shifted EODs. Capacitance induced waveform distortions were effective, but the effect of such distortions was opposite to the effect on dorsolateral zone cells. These effects were very similar to the effects on A-type primary afferents from mormyromast electroreceptors which project to this zone.The results show that peripheral information about capacitive objects is preserved in the electrosensory lobe, but do not indicate any further processing of capacitive information in the lobe.     

The development of the Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR) in Eigenmannia: An innate behavior indeed

Summary In its Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR), the gymnotiform electric fish Eigenmannia shifts its electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from similar interfering frequencies. Continual behavioral measurements were carried out in 164 juvenile fish until a correct JAR emerged. Sixty-four of these fish were raised in complete isolation, the remainder in a community of their siblings. A correct JAR emerged in fish of 1.2–1.6 cm in body length, corresponding to a developmental age of 24–32 days. In 6 of 164 fish, the emergence of a correct JAR followed an interim appearance of an incorrect JAR, which involved frequency shifts in the direction opposite to those of a correct JAR. The fish raised in isolation developed the same forms of behavior and showed the same sequence in their appearance as did socially raised fish. This indicates that the JAR and its developmental schedule are innate. The appearance of an incorrect JAR suggests initial errors or incompleteness in the wiring of central nervous connections. A correct JAR ultimately emerged even if a stimulus regimen was offered that rewarded frequency shifts in the direction opposite to those of a correct JAR. This indicates that the development of the JAR is immune to experimental alterations of sensory experience.Abbreviations Df frequency difference between a jamming stimulus and fish's EOD - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EO electric organ - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR Jamming Avoidance Response - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nE subnucleus of nE, causing drop of EOD frequency - nE subnucleus of nE, causing rise of EOD frequency - Pn pacemaker nucleus - PPn prepacemaker nucleus     

Neural correlates of novelty detection in pulse-type weakly electric fish

Evoked potentials (EPs) and single unit recordings from various electrosensory-processing regions of several pulse-type gymnotiform species were made to investigate neural activity patterns that could be associated with novelty detection. Whereas the electrosensory afferents and cells in the ELL exhibited only minor changes in response size as stimuli were presented less frequently (novel stimuli), most units studied in the torus semicircularis (TS) showed very strong, increased responsiveness to stimuli presented less frequently relative to stimuli presented persistently (at every EOD event. The responses of the TS were graded with respect to stimulus frequency. The discrimination between novel and persistent stimuli by the TS occurred with stimuli presented transversely or longitudinally with respect to the fish's long axis, and regardless of the timing of the stimulus with respect to the fish's pacemaker-related signal (PS). When electrosensory novelties were presented persistently the responses of the TS rapidly habituated. This may indicate that activity in this region of the TS is novelty related. This novelty-related activity in the TS can be correlated with certain aspects of the fish's behavior, i.e., EOD interval length during a behavioral novelty response. However, TS activity may continue to indicate the occurrence of electrosensory novelties after the behavior has habituated. It is suggested that the novelty-related activity of the TS of these fish is necessary, but not sufficient, for the production of electrosensory novelty-induced behavioral responses. Lesions of the region of the TS containing the rapidly-habituating neurons abolished the electrosensory novelty response, but not that resulting from visual and auditory stimulation.     

‘Ancestral’ neural mechanisms of electrolocation suggest a substrate for the evolution of the jamming avoidance response

Summary The genusSternopygus, believed to reflect ancestral traits of gymnotiform electric fish, is closely related to the more modern genusEigenmannia (Mago-Leccia 1978; Fink and Fink 1981).Sternopygus is the only known genus of electric fish that does not perform a jamming avoidance response (JAR) to minimize the potentially detrimental effects of signal interference between discharging neighbors (Bullock et al. 1972, 1975), and its ability to electrolocate objects is rather immune to jamming (Matsubara and Heiligenberg 1978).By studying the responses of midbrain neurons to stimulus regimes effective in eliciting the JAR inEigenmannia, we found thatSternopygus has neurons capable of discriminating the sign of the difference frequency between interfering electric organ discharges (EODs). These sign-selective neurons, which are believed to be important elements in the control of the JAR inEigenmannia, may, therefore, fulfill a more general function in the detection of moving objects and conspecifics but could potentially be assembled for the evolution of a JAR inSternopygus. The relative immunity to jamming in this genus may result, in part, from a stronger reliance upon the ampullary electrosensory system which operates in the DC and low-frequency range, outside the EOD spectrum of these fish.Abbreviations AM amplitude modulation - Df frequency difference - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response     

In vitro studies of closed-loop feedback and electrosensory processing in Apteronotus leptorhynchus

Electrosensory systems comprise extensive feedback pathways. It is also well known that these pathways exhibit synaptic plasticity on a wide-range of time scales. Recent in vitro brain slice studies have characterized synaptic plasticity in the two main feedback pathways to the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL), a primary electrosensory nucleus in Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Currently-used slice preparations, involving networks in open-loop conditions, allow feedback inputs to be studied in isolation, a critical step in determining their synaptic properties. However, to fully understand electrosensory processing, we must understand how dynamic feedback modulates neuronal responses under closed-loop conditions. To bridge the gap between current in vitro approaches and more complex in vivo work, we present two new in vitro approaches for studying the roles of closed-loop feedback in electrosensory processing. The first involves a hybrid-network approach using dynamic clamp, and the second involves a new slice preparation that preserves one of the feedback pathways to ELL in a closed-loop condition.     

Commissural neurons of the electrosensory lateral line lobe of Apteronotus leptorhynchus: morphological and physiological characteristics

Extracellular injections of horseradish peroxidase were used to label commissural cells connecting the electrosensory lateral line lobes of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Multiple commissural pathways exist; a caudal commissure is made up of ovoid cell axons, and polymorphic cells' axons project via a rostral commissure. Intracellular recording and labeling showed that ovoid cells discharge spontaneously at high rates, fire at preferred phases to the electric organ discharge, and respond to increased receptor afferent input with short latency partially adapting excitation. Ovoid cell axons ramify extensively in the rostro-caudal direction but are otherwise restricted to a single ELL subdivision. Polymorphic cells are also spontaneously active, but their firing is unrelated to the electric organ discharge waveform. They respond to increased receptor afferent activity with reduced firing frequency and response latency is long. Electrical stimulation of the commissural axons alters the behavior of pyramidal cells in the contralateral ELL. Basilar pyramidal cells are hyperpolarized and nonbasilar pyramidal cells are depolarized by this type of stimulation. The physiological results indicate that the ovoid cells participate in common mode rejection mechanisms and also suggest that the ELLs may function in a differential mode in which spatially restricted electrosensory stimuli can evoke heightened responses.Abbreviations ccELL caudal commissure of the ELL - CE contralaterally excited - DML dorsal molecular layer - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - HRP horseradish peroxidase - IE ipsilaterally excited - MTI mouth-tail inverted - MTN mouth-tail normal - rcELL rostral commissure of the ELL - TRI transverse inverted - TRN transverse normal     

From distributed sensory processing to discrete motor representations in the diencephalon of the electric fish,Eigenmannia

Summary During their jamming avoidance response (JAR), weakly electric fish of the genusEigenmannia shift their electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from a similar EOD frequency of a neighboring fish. The behavioral rules and neural substrates for stimulus recognition and motor control of the JAR have been extensively studied (see review by Heiligenberg 1986). The diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) links sensory processing within the torus semicircularis and optic tectum with the mesencephalic prepacemaker nucleus which, in turn, modulates the medullary pacemaker nucleus and hence the EOD frequency. Two separate areas within the nE responsible for JAR-related EOD frequency rises and frequency falls, respectively, were identified by iontophoresis of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate. Bilateral lesion of the areas causing EOD frequency rises resulted in elimination of JAR-related frequency rises above a baseline frequency obtained in the absence of a jamming stimulus. Similarly, bilateral lesion of the areas causing frequency falls resulted in a loss of JAR-related frequency falls below the baseline frequency. Whether these areas are also responsible for non-JAR-related frequency shifts is not known. The strength of response and spatial extent of the areas causing frequency shifts varied among fish and also varied in individual fish, reflecting the strength of JAR-related frequency shifts and the balance of activities in frequency-rise and frequency-fall areas. Local application of bicuculline-methiodide or GABA demonstrated a tonic inhibitory input to each area and suggests a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the two ipsilateral areas, possibly accounting for much of the individual plasticity.The nE thus is a site for neuronal transformation from distributed, topographically organized processing within the laminated structures of the torus and tectum to discrete cell clusters which control antagonistic motor responses.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - Df difference frequency between jamming signal and the fish's own EOD - nE nucleus electrosensorius - PPn prepacemaker nucleus     

Structure and function of neurons in the complex of the nucleus electrosensorius of the gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia: Detection and processing of electric signals in social communication

Summary The complex of the diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) provides an interface between the electrosensory processing performed by the torus semicircularis and the control of specific behavioral responses. The rostral portion of the nE comprises two subdivisions that differ in the response properties and projection patterns of their neurons. First, the nEb (Fig. 1 B), which contains neurons that are driven almost exclusively by beat patterns generated by the interference of electric organ discharges (EODs) of similar frequencies. Second, the area medial to the nEb, comprising the lateral pretectum (PT) and the nE-acusticolateralis region (nEar, Fig. 1 B-D), which contains neurons excited predominantly by EOD interruptions, signals associated with aggression and courtship. Neurons in the second area commonly receive convergent inputs originating from ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, which respond to the low-frequency and high-frequency components of EOD interruptions, respectively. Projections of these neurons to hypothalamic areas linked to the pituitary may mediate modulations of a fish's endocrine state that are caused by exposure to EOD interruptions of its mate.Abbreviations a axon - ATh anterior thalamic nucleus - CCb corpus cerebelli - CE central nucleus of the inferior lobe - CP central posterior thalamic nucleus - Df frequency difference between neighbor's EOD and fish's own - DFl nucleus diffusus lateralis of the inferior lobe - DFm nucleus diffusus medialis of the inferior lobe - DTn dorsal tegmental nucleus - EOD electric organ discharge - G glomerular nucleus - Hc caudal hypothalamus - Hd dorsal hypothalamus - Hl lateral hypothalamus - Hv ventral hypothalamus - JAR jamming avoidance response - LL lateral lemniscus - MGT magnocellular tegmental nucleus - MLF medial longitudinal fasciculus - nB nucleus at the base of the optic tract - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nEar nucleus electrosensorius-acusticolateral region - nEb nucleus electrosensorius-beat related area - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing rise of EOD frequency - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing fall of EOD frequency - nLT nucleus tuberis lateralis - nLV nucleus lateralis valvulae - PC posterior commissure - Pd nucleus praeeminentialis, pars dorsalis - PeG periglomerular complex - PG preglomerular nucleus - PLm medial division of the perilemniscal nucleus - Pn pacemaker nucleus - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - PT pretectal nucleus - PTh prethalamic nucleus - R red nucleus - Sc suprachiasmatic nucleus - SE nucleus subelectrosensorius - TAd nucleus tuberis anterior-dorsal subdivision - TAv nucleus tuberis anterior-ventral subdivision - TeO optic tectum - TL torus longitudinalis - TSd dorsal (electrosensory) torus semicircularis - TSv ventral (mechanosensory and auditory) torus semicircularis - tTB tecto-bulbar tract - VCb cerebellar valvula - VP valvular peduncle - VPn nucleus of the valvular peduncle     

Emergence of temporal-pattern sensitive neurons in the midbrain of weakly electric fish Gymnarchus niloticus.

Sensitivity of neurons in the torus semicircularis of a weakly electric fish, Gymnarchus niloticus, to two stimulus parameters that are critical for its behavior the jamming avoidance response was examined. The first parameter is the sign of frequency difference between discharge frequencies of fish's own electric organ and that of a neighbor's. The second parameter is the spatial orientation of neighbor's electric field. Whereas neuronal ambiguity of frequency coding for different orientations of neighbor's electric field is predicted, unambiguous JAR occurs at the behavioral level. Most neurons in the torus semicircularis showed sensitivity to the sign of frequency difference. Although a small number of neurons showed preference to a consistent sign of the frequency difference, the coding of the sign of frequency differences was found to be ambiguous with a highly variable pattern of responses for different orientations in most of neurons.