Mechanism and consequences for paralog-specific sumoylation of ubiquitin-specific protease 25

Vertebrates express two distinct families of SUMO proteins (SUMO1 and SUMO2/3) that serve distinct functions as posttranslational modifiers. Many proteins are modified specifically with SUMO1 or SUMO2/3, but the mechanisms for paralog selectivity are poorly understood. In a screen for SUMO2/3 binding proteins, we identified Ubiquitin Specific Protease 25 (USP25). USP25 turned out to also be a target for sumoylation, being more efficient with SUMO2/3. Sumoylation takes place within USP25's two ubiquitin interaction motifs (UIMs) that are required for efficient hydrolysis of ubiquitin chains. USP25 sumoylation impairs binding to and hydrolysis of ubiquitin chains. Both SUMO2/3-specific binding and sumoylation depend on a SUMO interaction motif (SIM/SBM). Seven amino acids in the SIM of USP25 are sufficient for SUMO2/3-specific binding and conjugation, even when taken out of structural context. One mechanism for paralog-specific sumoylation may, thus, involve SIM-dependent recruitment of SUMO1 or SUMO2/3 thioester-charged Ubc9 to targets.     

1H, 13C and 15N backbone and side-chain resonance assignments of the N-terminal ubiquitin-binding domains of USP25

Ubiquitin Specific Protease 25 (USP25), a member of the deubiquitinase family, is involved in several disease-related signal pathways including myogenesis, immunity and protein degradation. It specially catalyzes the hydrolysis of the K48-linked and K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. USP25 contains one ubiquitin-associated domain and two ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs) in its N-terminal region, which interact with ubiquitin and play a role in substrate recognition. Besides, it has been shown that the catalysis activity of USP25 is either impaired by sumoylation or enhanced by ubiquitination within its UIM. To elucidate the structural basis of the cross-regulation of USP25 function by non-covalent binding and covalent modifications of ubiquitin and SUMO2/3, a systematic structural biology study of USP25 is required. Here, we report the ¹H, ¹³C and ¹⁵N backbone and side-chain resonance assignments of the N-terminal ubiquitin binding domains (UBDs) of USP25 with BMRB accession number of 19111, which is the first step of the systematic structural biology study of the enzyme.     

The UBA-UIM Domains of the USP25 Regulate the Enzyme Ubiquitination State and Modulate Substrate Recognition

USP25m is the muscle isoform of the deubiquitinating (DUB) enzyme USP25. Similarly to most DUBs, data on USP25 regulation and substrate recognition is scarce. In silico analysis predicted three ubiquitin binding domains (UBDs) at the N-terminus: one ubiquitin-associated domain (UBA) and two ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs), whereas no clear structural homology at the extended C-terminal region outside the catalytic domains were detected. In order to asses the contribution of the UBDs and the C-terminus to the regulation of USP25m catalytic activity, ubiquitination state and substrate interaction, serial and combinatorial deletions were generated. Our results showed that USP25m catalytic activity did not strictly depend on the UBDs, but required a coiled-coil stretch between amino acids 679 to 769. USP25 oligomerized but this interaction did not require either the UBDs or the C-terminus. Besides, USP25 was monoubiquitinated and able to autodeubiquitinate in a possible loop of autoregulation. UBDs favored the monoubiquitination of USP25m at the preferential site lysine 99 (K99). This residue had been previously shown to be a target for SUMO and this modification inhibited USP25 activity. We showed that mutation of K99 clearly diminished USP25-dependent rescue of the specific substrate MyBPC1 from proteasome degradation, thereby supporting a new mechanistic model, in which USP25m is regulated through alternative conjugation of ubiquitin (activating) or SUMO (inhibiting) to the same lysine residue (K99), which may promote the interaction with distinct intramolecular regulatory domains.     

Ubiquitin-specific Protease 11 (USP11) Deubiquitinates Hybrid Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO)-Ubiquitin Chains to Counteract RING Finger Protein 4 (RNF4)

Ring finger protein 4 (RNF4) is a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase with a pivotal function in the DNA damage response (DDR). SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) in the N-terminal part of RNF4 tightly bind to SUMO polymers, and RNF4 can ubiquitinate these polymers in vitro. Using a proteomic approach, we identified the deubiquitinating enzyme ubiquitin-specific protease 11 (USP11), a known DDR-component, as a functional interactor of RNF4. USP11 can deubiquitinate hybrid SUMO-ubiquitin chains to counteract RNF4. SUMO-enriched nuclear bodies are stabilized by USP11, which functions downstream of RNF4 as a counterbalancing factor. In response to DNA damage induced by methyl methanesulfonate, USP11 could counteract RNF4 to inhibit the dissolution of nuclear bodies. Thus, we provide novel insight into cross-talk between ubiquitin and SUMO and uncover USP11 and RNF4 as a balanced SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase/protease pair with a role in the DDR.     

Enhanced protein expression in the baculovirus/insect cell system using engineered SUMO fusions

Recombinant protein expression in insect cells varies greatly from protein to protein. A fusion tag that is not only a tool for detection and purification, but also enhances expression and/or solubility would greatly facilitate both structure/function studies and therapeutic protein production. We have shown that fusion of SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) to several test proteins leads to enhanced expression levels in Escherichia coli. In eukaryotic expression systems, however, the SUMO tag could be cleaved by endogenous desumoylase. In order to adapt SUMO-fusion technology to these systems, we have developed an alternative SUMO-derived tag, designated SUMOstar, which is not processed by native SUMO proteases. In the present study, we tested the SUMOstar tag in a baculovirus/insect cell system with several proteins, i.e. mouse UBP43, human tryptase beta II, USP4, USP15, and GFP. Our results demonstrate that fusion to SUMOstar enhanced protein expression levels at least 4-fold compared to either the native or His(6)-tagged proteins. We isolated active SUMOstar tagged UBP43, USP4, USP15, and GFP. Tryptase was active following cleavage with a SUMOstar specific protease. The SUMOstar system will make significant impact in difficult-to-express proteins and especially to those proteins that require the native N-terminal residue for function.     

The deubiquitinase USP36 promotes snoRNP group SUMOylation and is essential for ribosome biogenesis

SUMOylation plays a crucial role in regulating diverse cellular processes including ribosome biogenesis. Proteomic analyses and experimental evidence showed that a number of nucleolar proteins involved in ribosome biogenesis are modified by SUMO. However, how these proteins are SUMOylated in cells is less understood. Here, we report that USP36, a nucleolar deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB), promotes nucleolar SUMOylation. Overexpression of USP36 enhances nucleolar SUMOylation, whereas its knockdown or genetic deletion reduces the levels of SUMOylation. USP36 interacts with SUMO2 and Ubc9 and directly mediates SUMOylation in cells and in vitro. We show that USP36 promotes the SUMOylation of the small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) components Nop58 and Nhp2 in cells and in vitro and their binding to snoRNAs. It also promotes the SUMOylation of snoRNP components Nop56 and DKC1. Functionally, we show that knockdown of USP36 markedly impairs rRNA processing and translation. Thus, USP36 promotes snoRNP group SUMOylation and is critical for ribosome biogenesis and protein translation.     

Regulation of USP28 Deubiquitinating Activity by SUMO Conjugation

USP28 (ubiquitin-specific protease 28) is a deubiquitinating enzyme that has been implicated in the DNA damage response, the regulation of Myc signaling, and cancer progression. The half-life stability of major regulators of critical cellular pathways depends on the activities of specific ubiquitin E3 ligases that target them for proteosomal degradation and deubiquitinating enzymes that promote their stabilization. One function of the post-translational small ubiquitin modifier (SUMO) is the regulation of enzymatic activity of protein targets. In this work, we demonstrate that the SUMO modification of the N-terminal domain of USP28 negatively regulates its deubiquitinating activity, revealing a role for the N-terminal region as a regulatory module in the control of USP28 activity. Despite the presence of ubiquitin-binding domains in the N-terminal domain, its truncation does not impair deubiquitinating activity on diubiquitin or polyubiquitin chain substrates. In contrast to other characterized USP deubiquitinases, our results indicate that USP28 has a chain preference activity for Lys¹¹, Lys⁴⁸, and Lys⁶³ diubiquitin linkages.     

Sumoylation modulates 20-hydroxyecdysone signaling by maintaining USP protein levels in Drosophila

The nuclear receptor complex for the insect steroid hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), is a heterodimer of EcR and USP. It has been shown that Drosophila EcR and USP can be sumoylated in mammalian cells, but it is unknown whether EcR-USP sumoylation naturally occurs in Drosophila. In Drosophila cells, USP, but not EcR, was sumoylated by Smt3, the only Drosophila SUMO protein. The presence of EcR enhanced USP sumoylation, which is further enhanced by 20E treatment. In addition to the Lys20 sumoylation site, five potential acceptor lysine residues in USP were predicted and verified. Mutation of the USP sumoylation sites or reduction of smt3 expression by RNAi attenuated 20E-induced reporter activity. Moreover, in the salivary glands, reducing smt3 expression by RNAi decreased 20E-induced reporter activity, gene expression, and autolysosome formation. Importantly, at least partially, the smt3 RNAi-mediated reduction in 20E signaling resulted from decreased protein levels of USP. In conclusion, sumoylation modulates 20E signaling by maintaining USP protein levels in Drosophila.     

The p150 subunit of CAF-1 causes association of SUMO2/3 with the DNA replication foci

The small ubiquitin-related modifier 2/3 (SUMO2/3) can be post-translationally conjugated to a wide variety of proteins constituting chromatin, the platform for genetic and epigenetic regulation. Nevertheless, it is unclear how SUMO2/3 and SUMO2/3-modified proteins are delivered to the chromatin fibers. Here we report that the largest subunit of chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1), human p150, interacts directly and preferentially with SUMO2/3. Amino acid residue of 98-105 in p150 is essential and sufficient for SUMO2/3 interaction. p150-SUMO2/3 interaction coincided with regions that replicate chromatin fibers, because accumulation of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) were detected at foci co-localized with both p150 and SUMO2/3 during the S-phase in a cell line expressing epitope-tagged p150. Although inhibition of SUMO2/3 expression had only a small effect on p150 deposition on the replication sites, depletion of p150 led to delocalization of SUMO2/3 from the replication foci. Furthermore, p150 mutants deficient in SUMO2/3 interaction, caused a major reduction of SUMO2/3 at the replication foci. Thus, our findings suggest an expanded role of p150 as a SUMO2/3-interacting factor, and raise the intriguing possibility that p150 plays a role in promoting delivery of SUMO2/3 or SUMO2/3-modified proteins (or both) on chromatin fibers during replication.     

SUMO modification of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K

Post-translational modification with small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) alters the function of many proteins, but the molecular mechanisms and consequences of this modification are still poorly defined. During a screen for novel SUMO1 targets, we identified the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K (Hip2). SUMO attachment severely impairs E2-25K ubiquitin thioester and unanchored ubiquitin chain formation in vitro. Crystal structures of E2-25K(1-155) and of the E2-25K(1-155)-SUMO conjugate (E2-25K(*)SUMO) indicate that SUMO attachment interferes with E1 interaction through its location on the N-terminal helix. The SUMO acceptor site in E2-25K, Lys14, does not conform to the consensus site found in most SUMO targets (PsiKXE), and functions only in the context of an alpha-helix. In contrast, adjacent SUMO consensus sites are modified only when in unstructured peptides. The demonstration that secondary structure elements are part of SUMO attachment signals could contribute to a better prediction of SUMO targets.     

Gene expression and cell growth are modified by silencing SUMO2 and SUMO3 expression

Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is a group of proteins binding to lysine residues of target proteins and thereby modifying their stability, activity and subcellular localization. Here we report that blocking SUMO2 and SUMO3 conjugation by silencing their expression markedly modifies gene expression. A microRNA-based RNAi system was used to specifically silence SUMO2 and SUMO3 expression simultaneously and stably transfected neuroblastoma B35 cells expressing dual SUMO2/3 microRNA were created. In cells stably expressing SUMO2/3 microRNA, mRNA levels of 105 and 58 known genes were significantly up- and down-regulated, respectively. About 20% of differentially regulated genes were associated with pathways involved in cell growth and differentiation. Cell division was significantly suppressed in SUMO2/3 miRNA expressing cells. Elucidating what effect the silencing of SUMO2/3 expression has on gene expression will help to identify the impact of SUMO2/3 conjugation on the various cellular pathways.     

��ChopNSpice,�� a Mass Spectrometric Approach That Allows Identification of Endogenous Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier-conjugated Peptides

Conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) to substrates is involved in a large number of cellular processes. Typically, SUMO is conjugated to lysine residues within a SUMO consensus site; however, an increasing number of proteins are sumoylated on non-consensus sites. To appreciate the functional consequences of sumoylation, the identification of SUMO attachment sites is of critical importance. Discovery of SUMO acceptor sites is usually performed by a laborious mutagenesis approach or using MS. In MS, identification of SUMO acceptor sites in higher eukaryotes is hampered by the large tryptic fragments of SUMO1 and SUMO2/3. MS search engines in combination with known databases lack the possibility to search MSMS spectra for larger modifications, such as sumoylation. Therefore, we developed a simple and straightforward database search tool (“ChopNSpice”) that successfully allows identification of SUMO acceptor sites from proteins sumoylated in vivo and in vitro. By applying this approach we identified SUMO acceptor sites in, among others, endogenous SUMO1, SUMO2, RanBP2, and Ubc9.Post-translational modification with ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers (Ubls)1 such as SUMO plays an important role in most, if not all, cellular processes (1–6). Conjugation of Ubls to their targets involves an isopeptide bond between the carboxyl group of the modifier and the ε-amino group of a lysine residue within the targets. Attachment of Ubls to specific targets involves an enzymatic cascade. First the Ubls are processed to expose their C-terminal diglycine motif. The mature Ubl is then transferred to its target via a cascade of E1 (activating), E2 (conjugating), and E3 (ligase) enzymes. The conjugation system for SUMO consists of a heterodimeric activating enzyme, Aos1/Uba2; a conjugating enzyme, Ubc9; and E3 ligases, such as RanBP2 or members of the PIAS family. The conjugation status undergoes perpetual change and is governed by a small family of SUMO proteases that hydrolyze the isopeptide bond between SUMO and its target (7, 8). Although in lower eukaryotes only one SUMO is present, vertebrates express at least three different SUMO paralogs: SUMO1, SUMO2, and SUMO3. Mature SUMO2 and SUMO3 (referred to as SUMO2/3) are 97% identical but differ substantially from SUMO1 (∼50% identity).Although the list of known SUMO substrates is growing rapidly, our understanding of the functional consequences for many of these targets is lagging behind. At a molecular level, the functional consequences of SUMO conjugation can be explained by a gain or loss of interaction with other macromolecules (3, 4). SUMO-dependent intramolecular conformational changes have also been described (9, 10). Thus, to appreciate the role that SUMO plays in the regulation of specific substrates, identification of the acceptor site(s) for SUMO conjugation is of key importance.So far, identification of SUMO acceptor sites has relied largely on mutation of the SUMO consensus site, which consists of a short motif with the sequence ψKXE (ψ represents a bulky hydrophobic residue, and X represents any amino acid). This motif is recognized by Ubc9 if presented in an extended conformation (11–13). However, an increasing number of proteins, such as PCNA, E2-25K, Daxx, and USP25, turned out to be sumoylated on lysine residues that do not conform to the SUMO consensus site (14–17). For this category of proteins, as well as for proteins that contain a large number of SUMO consensus sites, the identification of acceptor lysines is a burdensome task that often involves mutagenesis of each lysine residue within the substrate in turn.MS is currently one of the state-of-the-art technologies to identify protein factors and their post-translational modifications in an unbiased and sensitive manner. Several groups have shown that, using overexpressed tagged SUMO, MS can be efficiently exploited to identify endogenous substrates for SUMO conjugation (18–20). However, the identification of SUMO acceptor lysines using MS has remained a more challenging task (18, 21, 23, 24). So far, using tagged SUMO, unbiased identification of acceptor lysines for endogenous substrates has only been observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (18). The identification of substrates in higher eukaryotes has been hampered by the large conjugated SUMO peptide that arises upon tryptic digestion (>2154 Da with human SUMO1 and >3568 Da with human SUMO2/3 compared with 484 Da for Smt3 in S. cerevisiae). Such large fragments, in addition to the mass of the conjugated peptide, can impede their in-gel digestion, extraction, detection, and sequencing in MS. To overcome some of these limitations, several different strategies have been developed: 1) mutation of the tryptic fragment of SUMO, yielding a smaller tryptic fragment (23), 2) development of an automated recognition pattern tool (SUMmOn) (24), and 3) identification of targets using an in vitro to in vivo approach (21). Although these approaches have been applied successfully for the identification of SUMO conjugates in vitro and in vivo, unbiased identification of SUMO conjugates in vivo has not been achieved in higher eukaryotes. Another hurdle to such identification of SUMO conjugates is the variety of masses that can theoretically arise for just one SUMO-conjugated lysine in a given protein because of tryptic miscleavages. Thus, the unambiguous identification of SUMO acceptor sites requires the mass of the modified peptide carrying the conjugated SUMO (fragment) to be measured with high accuracy, and most importantly, it requires sequence analysis of the modified peptides. Because available proteomics search engines lack the possibility to search MSMS spectra for larger modifications, e.g. those that occur upon sumoylation, we developed a novel, simple, and straightforward database search tool (“ChopNSpice”) that, in combination with current proteomics search engines (such as MASCOT (25) or SEQUEST (26)), allows one to identify SUMO1 and SUMO2/3 acceptor sites unambiguously. We confirmed this strategy in vitro on various substrates and demonstrate the power of this technique by the identification of acceptor lysines within several endogenous targets from HeLa cells.     

Ubiquitin-Specific Proteases 25 Negatively Regulates Virus-Induced Type I Interferon Signaling

Ubiquitination and deubiquitination have emerged as critical regulatory processes in the virus-triggered type I interferon (IFN) induction pathway. In this study, we carried out a targeted siRNA screen of 54 ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) and identified USP25 as a negative regulator of the virus-triggered type I IFN signaling pathway. Overexpression of USP25 inhibited virus-induced activation of IFN-β, interferon regulation factor 3 (IRF3) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), as well as the phosphorylation of IRF3 and NF-κB subunit p65. Furthermore, Knockdown of USP25 potentiated virus-induced induction of the IFN-β. In addition, detailed analysis demonstrated that USP25 cleaved lysine 48- and lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chains in vitro and in vivo, and its deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB) activity, were dependent on a cysteine residue (Cys178) and a histidine residue (His607). USP25 mutants lacking DUB activity lost the ability to block virus-induced type I IFN to some degree. Mechanistically, USP25 deubiquitinated retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I), tumornecrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), and TRAF6 to inhibit RIG-I-like receptor-mediated IFN signaling. Our findings suggest that USP25 is a novel DUB negatively regulating virus-induced type I IFN production.     

The miR-27a-3p/USP25 axis participates in the pathogenesis of recurrent miscarriage by inhibiting trophoblast migration and invasion

Insufficient invasion ability of trophoblasts might be associated with the development of recurrent miscarriage (RM). Ubiquitin-specific protease 25 (USP25) can regulate the processes of invasion and migration in different types of cancer cells. However, the effect of USP25 on trophoblasts and its roles in the development of RM are unknown. In this study, we first analyzed the USP25 expression in placental villous tissues from RM patients, and then assessed the roles of USP25 in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion and migration of trophoblasts. Furthermore, bioinformatics prediction and luciferase reporter assay were used to explore the mechanism of microRNA on USP25 expression, and regulation of USP25 expression in trophoblasts was assessed following transfection with microRNA mimics or inhibitor. The results showed that the expression of USP25 in the placental villous tissues was downregulated in RM patients. Knockdown of USP25 suppressed the EMT process, the invasion and migration capability of trophoblast cells, while overexpression of USP25 exhibited opposite results. Mechanistically, miR-27a-3p could regulate USP25 expression by binding to the 3′-untranslated region of USP25 in trophoblasts. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction results found the expression of miR-27a-3p were negatively related to USP25 in RM patients. MiR-27a-3p mimics inhibited but miR-27a-3p inhibitor enhanced the migration and invasion capability of trophoblasts. Furthermore, sh-USP25 counteracted the promotion of invasion and migration mediated by the miR-27a-3p inhibitor. Taken together, these data indicate that USP25 downregulation by miR-27a-3p contributes to the EMT process, thereby inhibiting the migration and invasion of trophoblast cells, and these findings might provide potential biomarkers for RM.     

Structural Basis for the SUMO2 Isoform Specificity of SENP7

SUMO proteases or deSUMOylases regulate the lifetime of SUMO-conjugated targets in the cell by cleaving off the isopetidic bond between the substrate and the SUMO modifier, thus reversing the conjugation activity of the SUMO E3 ligases. In humans the deSUMOylating activity is mainly conducted by the SENP/ULP protease family, which is constituted of six members sharing a homologous catalytic globular domain. SENP6 and SENP7 are the most divergent members of the family and they show a unique SUMO2/3 isoform preference and a particular activity for dismantling polySUMO2 chains. Here, we present the crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human SENP7 bound to SUMO2, revealing structural key elements for the SUMO2 isoform specificity of SENP7. In particular, we describe the specific contacts between SUMO2 and a unique insertion in SENP7 (named Loop1) that is responsible for the SUMO2 isoform specificity. All the other interface contacts between SENP7 and SUMO2, including the SUMO2 C-terminal tail interaction, are conserved among members of the SENP/ULP family. Our data give insight into an evolutionary adaptation to restrict the deSUMOylating activity in SENP6 and SENP7 for the SUMO2/3 isoforms.     

A Role for Non-Covalent SUMO Interaction Motifs in Pc2/CBX4 E3 Activity

Background

Modification of proteins by the small ubiquitin like modifier (SUMO) is an essential process in mammalian cells. SUMO is covalently attached to lysines in target proteins via an enzymatic cascade which consists of E1 and E2, SUMO activating and conjugating enzymes. There is also a variable requirement for non-enzymatic E3 adapter like proteins, which can increase the efficiency and specificity of the sumoylation process. In addition to covalent attachment of SUMO to target proteins, specific non-covalent SUMO interaction motifs (SIMs) that are generally short hydrophobic peptide motifs have been identified.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Intriguingly, consensus SIMs are present in most SUMO E3s, including the polycomb protein, Pc2/Cbx4. However, a role for SIMs in SUMO E3 activity remains to be shown. We show that Pc2 contains two functional SIMs, both of which contribute to full E3 activity in mammalian cells, and are also required for sumoylation of Pc2 itself. Pc2 forms distinct sub-nuclear foci, termed polycomb bodies, and can recruit partner proteins, such as the corepressor CtBP. We demonstrate that mutation of the SIMs in Pc2 prevents Pc2-dependent CtBP sumoylation, and decreases enrichment of SUMO1 and SUMO2 at polycomb foci. Furthermore, mutational analysis of both SUMO1 and SUMO2 reveals that the SIM-interacting residues of both SUMO isoforms are required for Pc2-mediated sumoylation and localization to polycomb foci.

Conclusions/Significance

This work provides the first clear evidence for a role for SIMs in SUMO E3 activity.     

RanBP2 and SENP3 function in a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugation-deconjugation cycle on Borealin

The ubiquitin-like SUMO system controls cellular key functions, and several lines of evidence point to a critical role of SUMO for mitotic progression. However, in mammalian cells mitotic substrates of sumoylation and the regulatory components involved are not well defined. Here, we identify Borealin, a component of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), as a mitotic target of SUMO. The CPC, which additionally comprises INCENP, Survivin, and Aurora B, regulates key mitotic events, including chromosome congression, the spindle assembly checkpoint, and cytokinesis. We show that Borealin is preferentially modified by SUMO2/3 and demonstrate that the modification is dynamically regulated during mitotic progression, peaking in early mitosis. Intriguingly, the SUMO ligase RanBP2 interacts with the CPC, stimulates SUMO modification of Borealin in vitro, and is required for its modification in vivo. Moreover, the SUMO isopeptidase SENP3 is a specific interaction partner of Borealin and catalyzes the removal of SUMO2/3 from Borealin. These data thus delineate a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugation–deconjugation cycle of Borealin and further assign a regulatory function of RanBP2 and SENP3 in the mitotic SUMO pathway.     

Determinants of small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO1) protein specificity, E3 ligase, and SUMO-RanGAP1 binding activities of nucleoporin RanBP2

The RanBP2 nucleoporin contains an internal repeat domain (IR1-M-IR2) that catalyzes E3 ligase activity and forms a stable complex with SUMO-modified RanGAP1 and UBC9 at the nuclear pore complex. RanBP2 exhibits specificity for SUMO1 as RanGAP1-SUMO1/UBC9 forms a more stable complex with RanBP2 compared with RanGAP1-SUMO2 that results in greater protection of RanGAP-SUMO1 from proteases. The IR1-M-IR2 SUMO E3 ligase activity also shows a similar preference for SUMO1. We utilized deletions and domain swap constructs in protease protection assays and automodification assays to define RanBP2 domains responsible for RanGAP1-SUMO1 protection and SUMO1-specific E3 ligase activity. Our data suggest that elements in both IR1 and IR2 exhibit specificity for SUMO1. IR1 protects RanGAP1-SUMO1/UBC9 and functions as the primary E3 ligase of RanBP2, whereas IR2 retains the ability to interact with SUMO1 to promote SUMO1-specific E3 ligase activity. To determine the structural basis for SUMO1 specificity, a hybrid IR1 construct and IR1 were used to determine three new structures for complexes containing UBC9 with RanGAP1-SUMO1/2. These structures show more extensive contacts among SUMO, UBC9, and RanBP2 in complexes containing SUMO1 compared with SUMO2 and suggest that differences in SUMO specificity may be achieved through these subtle conformational differences.     

Swapping small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) isoform specificity of SUMO proteases SENP6 and SENP7

SUMO proteases can regulate the amounts of SUMO-conjugated proteins in the cell by cleaving off the isopeptidic bond between SUMO and the target protein. Of the six members that constitute the human SENP/ULP protease family, SENP6 and SENP7 are the most divergent members in their conserved catalytic domain. The SENP6 and SENP7 subclass displays a clear proteolytic cleavage preference for SUMO2/3 isoforms. To investigate the structural determinants for such isoform specificity, we have identified a unique sequence insertion in the SENP6 and SENP7 subclass that is essential for their proteolytic activity and that forms a more extensive interface with SUMO during the proteolytic reaction. Furthermore, we have identified a region in the SUMO surface determinant for the SUMO2/3 isoform specificity of SENP6 and SENP7. Double point amino acid mutagenesis on the SUMO surface allows us to swap the specificity of SENP6 and SENP7 between the two SUMO isoforms. Structure-based comparisons combined with biochemical and mutagenesis analysis have revealed Loop 1 insertion in SENP6 and SENP7 as a platform to discriminate between SUMO1 and SUMO2/3 isoforms in this subclass of the SUMO protease family.