不同产地蜂胶中氨基酸含量的比较

选择国内外7种不同产地蜂胶,采用氨基酸自动分析仪分别测定其氨基酸含量。结果表明,所测蜂胶均含有17种以上氨基酸,其构成模式比较接近,但氨基酸含量差异较大,北京蜂胶总氨基酸含量最低,为26.96mg·100g-1,杭州蜂胶总氨基酸含量最高,为165.74mg·100g-1,谷氨酸为各产地蜂胶中含量最高的氨基酸,其中杭州蜂胶谷氨酸含量居首,为30.74mg·100g-1,大部分蜂胶中约30%的氨基酸为必需氨基酸。不同产地蜂胶氨基酸含量差异,可能是影响其生物活性的一个重要因素。     

安徽省茶树品种与茶叶氨基酸遗传差异的对应分析

本文运用对应分析的方法对皖西和皖南种植的地方茶树品种与茶叶氨基酸遗传差异进行了研究,结果表明皖西品种必须氨基酸含量高于皖南品种.茶叶中17种游离氨基酸可用非必须氨基酸和必须氨基酸两个主因子来描述．对应分析可有效地同时揭示氨基酸间、品种间以及氨基酸与品种间的关系,茶叶氨基酸遗传差异与品种产地无必然联系．     

带血与排血梅花鹿茸骨片游离氨基酸含量的比较分析

选用6对带血与排血梅花鹿茸骨片对其游离氨基酸的含量进行了对比测定,结果表明含有7种必需氨基酸,必需氨基酸所占比例约30%,必需与非必需游离氨基酸之比约0.4。对两者进行方差分析,两种样品游离氨基酸总量和必需游离氨基酸总量差异不显著(P(0.05)。     

杏及杏产品中氨基酸含量的测定及其比较分析

以氨基酸总量为主要指标,对杏及杏产品的氨基酸进行分析测定,结果表明:不同品种之间氨基酸含量差异较大;做成杏产品,对其氨基酸含量几乎不会造成损失。     

人工冬虫夏草的氨基酸含量及其营养价值评价

目的为明确人工和野生冬虫夏草在氨基酸方面的差异,并为进一步开发利用人工冬虫夏草提供理论依据,对室内全人工培殖冬虫夏草和产自四川康定的野生冬虫夏草的氨基酸营养价值进行分析评价。方法用日立L-8800型全自动分析仪检测氨基酸含量并根据FAO/WHO的氨基酸评分标准模式和鸡蛋蛋白模式进行氨基酸营养价值评价。结果人工冬虫夏草氨基酸种类齐全,其全草氨基酸总量高于产自康定的野生冬虫夏草;其全草的鲜味氨基酸高于产自康定的野生冬虫夏草;其全草必需氨基酸总量低于产自康定的野生冬虫夏草。人工冬虫夏草必需氨基酸与氨基酸总量的比值高于WHO/FAO评分模式而低于鸡蛋蛋白模式。结论人工冬虫夏草氨基酸不仅种类组成合理,而且具有较高的营养价值。这一结果为人工冬虫夏草的进一步开发利用提供了理论基础。     

细胞膜组分与氨基酸转运吸收的关系

<正> 近些年来,国内外相继有不少实验提出了;肿瘤细胞与正常细胞氨基酸代谢存在着明显的差异。而且不同的肿瘤其变化不同,反映了不同的氨基酸成分对机体的营养和肿瘤的生长具有不同的作用和影响。细胞膜是细胞外物质进入细胞的必经之路,无疑这种差异与细胞膜的结构特性有着密切的关系。肿瘤细胞膜与相应的正常细胞膜相比其生化组分,酶活性以及流动性都有明显不同。     

桑天牛产卵分泌物与雌虫内生殖器官内容物组分的比较

本文对桑天牛Apriona germari Hope产卵分泌物和各生殖器官内容物的鲜重、蛋白质、还原性糖、游离氨基酸等含量进行了测定及对比分析,结果表明,产卵分泌物鲜重与输卵管萼内容物鲜重差异显著,而与交配囊、受精囊腺内容物鲜重差异不明显;产卵分泌物的蛋白质含量显著高于输卵管萼内容物的蛋白质含量;产卵分泌物的还原性糖含量显著低于交配囊内容物的还原性糖含量;产卵分泌物的游离氨基酸含量显著高于交配囊内容物中游离氨基酸含量。产卵分泌物中蛋白质、还原性糖、游离氨基酸等的含量与受精囊腺内容物相应成分含量均无显著差异,即受精囊腺是其贮藏器官。     

肝原性糖尿病人血浆氨基酸谱改变及分析

为探讨肝原性糖尿病人血浆氨基酸谱变化特点 ,对 6 0例病人进行 1 7种氨基酸检测和支芳比值分析 ,并设立慢性肝病组和糖尿病组作两两对照。结果显示 :观察组血浆芳香族氨基酸增高 ,部分支链氨基酸下降 ;支芳比值降低。成糖氨基酸中缬氨酸改变明显 ,与两组比较均有显著性差异 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论 :肝原性糖尿病人血浆氨基酸代谢紊乱 ,与慢性肝病、糖尿病改变均不同 ,在进行保肝治疗和营养支持时要针对其特点 ,科学合理地补充氨基酸和能量     

不同品种魔芋精粉中氨基酸含量分析研究

花魔芋和白魔芋精粉中均含有 18种水解氨基酸和 18种游离氨基酸 ,前者水解氨基酸的总量为 2 .4 4 % ,其中必须氨基酸质量分数为 0 .6 2 % ,游离氨基酸总量为 1.10 % ,其中游离必须氨基酸质量分数为 0 .33% ;后者水解氨基酸总量为 2 .0 1% ,其中必须水解氨基酸质量分数为 0 .5 6 % ,游离氨基酸总量为 0 .4 1% ,其中必须游离氨基酸质量分数为 0 .13%。提示白魔芋和花魔芋精粉中氨基酸含量略有差异 ,但此差异不大 ,其品质 ,营养价值及特性等主要取决于魔芋精粉中主要成分葡甘聚糖的含量     

传染性法氏囊病病毒中国强毒株A节段cDNA基因的克隆和序列分析

以来自哈尔滨传染性法氏囊病病毒（ＩＢＤＶ） 强毒株（Ｈａｒｂｉｎ 毒株,Ｈ） 的基因组ＲＮＡ为模板,用反转录聚合酶链反应（ＲＴ－ ＰＣＲ） 的方法得到了其Ａ 节段的全长ｃＤＮＡ 片段,分５＇端（１ ６５９ｂｐ） 和３＇端（１ ４４４ｂｐ） 上下两段分别克隆到ｐＧＥＭＢ○Ｒ － Ｔ 载体上,测定了其核苷酸顺序,在长为３ １０１ ｂｐ 中含有两个阅读框ＯＲＦＡ１ 和ＯＲＦＡ２ ,分别编码１ ０１２ 个氨基酸的前体蛋白（ＶＰ２ － ４ －３） 和１４５ 个氨基酸的ＶＰ５,ＯＲＦＡ１ 和ＯＲＦＡ２ 有部分的重叠。将核苷酸序列及推测出的氨基酸序列与已报道的ＩＢＤＶ 血清Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型毒株的相应序列进行了比较,结果表明：Ｈ 毒株与其它血清Ⅰ型毒株之间,在核苷酸水平上存在２５ｂｐ － ２６７ｂｐ 的差异;在氨基酸水平上存在１７ ～４０ 个氨基酸的差异。在ＶＰ２ － ４ － ３ 内比较显示,Ｈ 毒株与Ｐ２ 、Ｃｕ－ １ 之间氨基酸的差异最小为１ ．７％ ,Ｈ 毒株与ＵＫ６６１ 之间氨基酸的差异最大为３ ．９ ％ 。变异主要发生在ＶＰ２ 的可变区（２０６ － ３５０ 位氨基酸） ,在Ｈ 毒株所特有的１２ 个氨基酸当中,该区就占５ 个,代表１ ．７６ ％ 的变异。ＶＰ４、ＶＰ３ 和ＶＰ５区各有     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor