The Evolution of Mechanisms Driving the Stomatal Response to Vapor Pressure Deficit

Stomatal responses to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) are a principal means by which vascular land plants regulate daytime transpiration. While much work has focused on characterizing and modeling this response, there remains no consensus as to the mechanism that drives it. Explanations range from passive regulation by leaf hydration to biochemical regulation by the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). We monitored ABA levels, leaf gas exchange, and water status in a diversity of vascular land plants exposed to a symmetrical, mild transition in VPD. The stomata in basal lineages of vascular plants, including gymnosperms, appeared to respond passively to changes in leaf water status induced by VPD perturbation, with minimal changes in foliar ABA levels and no hysteresis in stomatal action. In contrast, foliar ABA appeared to drive the stomatal response to VPD in our angiosperm samples. Increased foliar ABA level at high VPD in angiosperm species resulted in hysteresis in the recovery of stomatal conductance; this was most pronounced in herbaceous species. Increased levels of ABA in the leaf epidermis were found to originate from sites of synthesis in other parts of the leaf rather than from the guard cells themselves. The transition from a passive regulation to ABA regulation of the stomatal response to VPD in the earliest angiosperms is likely to have had critical implications for the ecological success of this lineage.Plants continuously regulate transpiration by controlling the aperture of the stomatal pores on the surface of the leaf. The principal atmospheric determinant of stomatal aperture is the humidity of the air, which can be expressed as the vapor pressure difference between the leaf and the atmosphere. Stomatal responses to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) have been well characterized across the diversity of vascular plant species (Darwin, 1898; Lange et al., 1971; Turner et al., 1984; Franks and Farquhar, 1999; Oren et al., 1999; Brodribb and McAdam, 2011; Mott and Peak, 2013), with stomata typically closing at high VPD and opening at low VPD. This comprehensive characterization has allowed for the development of highly effective empirical and mechanistic models of leaf gas exchange that provide robust predictions of the responses of transpiration to changes in VPD (Buckley et al., 2003; Katul et al., 2009; Damour et al., 2010; Medlyn et al., 2011). Despite the success of this modeling, the mechanism for the stomatal response to VPD remains poorly understood (Damour et al., 2010). Different hypotheses range from one extreme, whereby stomata respond passively through changes in leaf water content induced by the VPD or humidity perturbation (Lange et al., 1971; Mott and Peak, 2013), to the other extreme, whereby stomata close uniquely in response to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA; Xie et al., 2006; Bauer et al., 2013).From the earliest recognition that stomata open and close by changes in guard cell turgor (Heath, 1938), there have been many attempts to link the passive changes in water status that occur during VPD or humidity transitions with stomatal responses to VPD or humidity (Lange et al., 1971; Mott and Peak, 2013). Studies have suggested that changes in atmospheric water content passively drive stomatal responses by changing bulk leaf water status, which in turn changes guard cell turgor (Oren et al., 1999), or alternatively by changing guard cell turgor directly (Mott and Peak, 2013). Models based on these entirely passive processes are highly effective in predicting steady-state stomatal conductance (g_s) in response to changes in VPD or humidity in angiosperms (Mott and Peak, 2013).While hydraulic models provide robust predictions of steady-state g_s, they are less effective at predicting the dynamic responses of stomata to short-term perturbations, particularly with respect to the wrong-way responses that typically occur as transients (Buckley, 2005), as well as feed-forward behavior (Farquhar, 1978; Bunce, 1997; Franks et al., 1997; Tardieu and Simonneau, 1998; Ocheltree et al., 2014; compare with Mott and Peak, 2013). Although some of these models provide a pathway for incorporating the effect of ABA (Buckley, 2005), a lack of knowledge of ABA dynamics or action makes it difficult to integrate the influence of this active regulator of guard cell aperture into models. The stomatal behavior of single gene mutants (most notably the ABA synthesis and signaling mutants of Arabidopsis) strongly supports a role for ABA in mediating standard stomatal responses to changes in VPD. The stomata of these mutants are known to have less pronounced responses to a reduction in relative humidity compared with wild-type plants (Xie et al., 2006). Recently, molecular work has shown that guard cells express many of the genes required to synthesize ABA (Okamoto et al., 2009; Bauer et al., 2013), with molecular proxies for ABA level also indicating that the biochemical activity of ABA in the guard cell may increase following short-term exposure of leaves to a reduction in relative humidity (Waadt et al., 2014). These findings suggest a role for ABA in regulating stomatal responses to VPD and have led some to the conclusion that ABA synthesized autonomously by the guard cells is the predominant mechanism for stomatal responses to increased VPD (Bauer et al., 2013).Although the experimental evidence from molecular studies presents an argument for the role of ABA in the responses of stomata to changes in VPD, very few studies have quantified changes in ABA level in response to VPD. It is well established that ABA levels in leaves and guard cells can increase following the imposition of turgor loss or water stress (Pierce and Raschke, 1980; Harris et al., 1988; Harris and Outlaw, 1991). However, only a few studies have reported increases in foliar ABA level in response to high VPD (Bauerle et al., 2004; Giday et al., 2013), and none have investigated whether these observed dynamic changes or differences in ABA level were functionally relevant for stomatal control. In addition, no study has quantified the levels of ABA in guard cells during a transition in VPD.Here, we investigate the relative importance of ABA for the stomatal response to VPD in whole plants, sampled from across the vascular land plant lineage. We provide, to our knowledge, the first functional assessment of changes in ABA levels driving stomatal responses to VPD as well as critically investigate the recent suggestion that stomatal responses to VPD are driven by an autonomous guard cell synthesis of ABA.     

Geranyllinalool Synthases in Solanaceae and Other Angiosperms Constitute an Ancient Branch of Diterpene Synthases Involved in the Synthesis of Defensive Compounds

Many angiosperm plants, including basal dicots, eudicots, and monocots, emit (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-1,3,7,11-tetraene, which is derived from geranyllinalool, in response to biotic challenge. An Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) geranyllinalool synthase (GLS) belonging to the e/f clade of the terpene synthase (TPS) family and two Fabaceae GLSs that belong to the TPS-g clade have been reported, making it unclear which is the main route to geranyllinalool in plants. We characterized a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) TPS-e/f gene, TPS46, encoding GLS (SlGLS) and its homolog (NaGLS) from Nicotiana attenuata. The K_m value of SlGLS for geranylgeranyl diphosphate was 18.7 µm, with a turnover rate value of 6.85 s^–1. In leaves and flowers of N. attenuata, which constitutively synthesize 17-hydroxygeranyllinalool glycosides, NaGLS is expressed constitutively, but the gene can be induced in leaves with methyl jasmonate. In tomato, SlGLS is not expressed in any tissue under normal growth but is induced in leaves by alamethicin and methyl jasmonate treatments. SlGLS, NaGLS, AtGLSs, and several other GLSs characterized only in vitro come from four different eudicot families and constitute a separate branch of the TPS-e/f clade that diverged from kaurene synthases, also in the TPS-e/f clade, before the gymnosperm-angiosperm split. The early divergence of this branch and the GLS activity of genes in this branch in diverse eudicot families suggest that GLS activity encoded by these genes predates the angiosperm-gymnosperm split. However, although a TPS sequence belonging to this GLS lineage was recently reported from a basal dicot, no representative sequences have yet been found in monocot or nonangiospermous plants.Geranyllinalool is an acyclic diterpene alcohol with a wide distribution in the plant kingdom; it has been identified as component of essential oils of distantly related plant species such as Jasmin grandiflorum, Michelia champaca, and Homamelis virginiana (Sandeep, 2009). Geranyllinalool is the precursor of 4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-1,3,7,11-tetraene (TMTT), a volatile C₁₆-homoterpene emitted from the foliage of many angiosperm species including Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), maize (Zea mays), fava bean (Vicia faba), lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and Eucalyptus spp. (Van Poecke et al., 2001; Ament et al., 2004; Williams et al., 2005; Hopke et al., 1994; Leitner et al., 2010; Webster et al., 2010). In addition, various hydroxygeranyllinalool glycosides have been isolated from many Solanaceous species such as Capsicum annuum, Lycium chinense, and at least 26 Nicotiana species (Yahara et al., 1993; Iorizzi et al., 2001; Snook et al., 1997).The biosynthetic pathway leading to geranyllinalool, as for all other terpenoids, begins with the condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate and its allylic isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate. Sequential condensation of one isopentenyl diphosphate molecule with three dimethylallyl diphosphate molecules produces geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), the C-20 intermediate of the diterpenoid pathway. Next, a terpene synthase (TPS) catalyzes a two-step reaction in which carbocation formation of the C20 precursor is followed by an allylic rearrangement that results in the production of the tertiary alcohol geranyllinalool (Herde et al., 2008).Although geranyllinalool and its derivatives, TMTT and geranyllinalool glycosides, have been reported in a wide variety of plant species, a geranyllinalool synthase (GLS) involved in TMTT biosynthesis was only recently identified in Arabidopsis (Herde et al., 2008). AtTPS04 belongs to the TPS-e/f subfamily along with the previously identified Clarkia spp. linalool synthases (Chen et al., 2011). More recently, two TPSs from Vitis vinifera and one from the daisy Grindelia hirsutula, also members of the TPS-e/f subfamily, were found to exhibit GLS activity in vitro (Martin et al., 2010; Zerbe et al., 2013). However, no in planta information has been presented for these, nor any evidence showing their involvement in TMTT biosynthesis.The common characteristic of the TPS-e/f GLSs so far identified is that they lack a predicted plastidial transit peptide, and direct evidence for nonplastidial localization was obtained in Arabidopsis by observing the AtTPS04-GUS fusion protein in the cytosol and endoplasmic reticulum (Herde et al., 2008). On the other hand, two TPS-g subfamily proteins from the closely related Fabaceae species Medicago truncatula and Phaseolus lunata (MtTPS03 and PlTPS2, respectively) were shown to be plastidic and to catalyze the formation of geranyllinalool in vitro when GGPP was provided as a substrate and also when expressed in a heterologous plant species (Arimura et al., 2008; Brillada et al., 2013). However, the same enzymes also produced linalool and nerolidol when supplied with geranyl diphosphate (GPP) and farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), respectively (Arimura et al., 2008; Brillada et al., 2013). Given the present paucity of in vivo and in vitro studies of geranyllinalool biosynthesis in plants, it is not clear whether geranyllinalool in plants is typically produced via TPS-g or TPS-e/f type TPSs, or both.The role of geranyllinalool itself in plant tissues is not well established. Often geranyllinalool coexists in floral or vegetative tissues with its homoterpene derivative TMTT. The contribution of TMTT to the floral scent of insect-pollinated species suggests a putative role in attraction of pollinators (Tholl et al., 2011). On the other hand, in many angiosperm species, including tomato, TMTT is a component of volatile blends released from vegetative tissues upon herbivore attack, sometimes in parallel with its constitutive emission from floral tissues (Hopke et al., 1994; Ament et al., 2004; de Boer et al., 2004; Kant et al., 2004; Williams et al., 2005, Herde et al., 2008). The latter case suggests that TMTT might play a defensive role in both vegetative and floral tissues. TMTT production from insect-infested plants is considered as an indirect defense mechanism because TMTT attracts insect predators of the insect herbivores (Brillada et al., 2013). Interestingly, production of TMTT, and the homoterpene (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene, from herbivore-attacked lima bean plants has been found to correlate with enhanced expression of defense genes in neighboring nonaffected control plants (Arimura et al., 2000). In these cases, homoterpenes are believed to act as stress-responsive signals that enable intraspecies plant-to-plant communication.A plant defense role has also been suggested for 17-hydroxygeranyllinalool diterpene glycosides (HGL-DTGs) present in leaves and flowers of Nicotiana species, with higher concentrations measured in buds (Heiling et al., 2010; Jassbi et al., 2010). Several studies have found negative correlation between total leaf HGL-DTG content and the mass of the larvae that feed on them (Jassbi et al., 2008; Dinh et al., 2013). Eleven HGL-DTGs that differ in sugar moieties and number of malonylesters have been isolated from Nicotiana attenuata. The sugar groups of these compounds are Glc and rhamnose and are conjugated to the hydroxygeranyllinalool skeleton via bonds at C3 and C17 hydroxylated carbons. Additional sugars may be added to these sugars on their hydroxyl groups at C2, C4, and C6, and manolyl esters are typically formed at the C6 hydroxyl group of the glucoses. The concentrations of these HGL-DTGs are higher in young and reproductive tissues. While their total levels appear to be constant, the concentration of individual compounds change upon herbivore attack, with a proportionally greater increase in malonylated compounds. Unlike many other defense-related specialized metabolites, the N. attenuata HGL-DTGs are not found on the leaf surface or the trichomes, but, instead, they accumulate inside the leaves (Heiling et al., 2010).Here, we show that in the Solanaceae species cultivated tomato and N. attenuata, geranyllinalool is synthesized by TPSs that belong to the TPS-e/f subfamily and that the corresponding genes are related to Arabidopsis TPS04. The tomato and N. attenuata enzymes were biochemically characterized, and the kinetic parameters were determined. We also describe a detailed quantitative expression of these genes in different parts of the plant. In addition, we establish that the expression of the geranyllinalool synthase genes correlates well with the induced emission of TMTT in tomato leaves after alamethicin and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments and with the total concentrations of HGL-DTGs in N. attenuata leaves and floral organs.