Acetic acid test: a promising screening test for early detection of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the acetic acid test (AAT) could be used as a screening testfor early detection of cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A hospital-based study was carried out. A sample of 376 women who attended the early cancer detection program of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social in the state of Durango during 1998 was included. The AAT was applied during the gynecologic examination. Each women underwent colposcopy and directed cervical biopsy. RESULTS: The biopsies revealed that five women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN 1) and 51, 2/3. Four values (true positive,false positive, false negative and true negative) were obtained according to the pathologic test for CIN 1(5, 129, 0 and 191) andfor CIN 2/3 (47, 129, 4 and 191). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value in women with CIN 1 were 1.00, .60, 1.00 and .04 and with CIN 2/3 were .92, .60, .98 and .27, respectively. CONCLUSION: This test is promisingfor early detection of cervical cancer given its high sensitivity. Understanding the biologic mechanisms underlying acetowhite changes necessitates further studies.     

Measurement of faecal bile acid sulphates

A method is described for the measurement, by difference, of the sulphate fractions of faecal bile acids. A solvolysis step (for the deliberate hydrolysis of the bile acid sulphates) was added to the procedure of sample homogenisation, extraction, enzymatic hydrolysis and thin-layer chromatography. The bile acids were quantitated by gas—liquid chromatography of their methyl ester and trifluoroacetate methyl ester derivatives on 3% QF-1 columns. The total bile acid excretion in 15 control subjects was 603 ± 71 mg/24 h (x̄ ± S.E.M.). The major bile acid peaks (mg/24 h) were: lithocholic acid, without solvolysis 118 ± 26 and including solvolysis 175 ± 30; deoxycholic acid 60 ± 8 and 90 ± 18 and chenodeoxycholic acid 13 ± 7 and 15 ± 7. It was concluded that bile acid sulphates may form a considerable proportion of the total bile acids excreted in man.     

Molecular biomarker-based screening for early detection of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a molecular biomarker-based screening method for early detection of cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Fluorescent immunochemical labeling was used to classify cervical cytology specimens as probably normal or probably abnormal. These specimens were then Papanicolaou stained and evaluated twice by a cytotechnologist and by a pathologist when appropriate. The first evaluation was performed as conventional Pap screening to assign a reference per-specimen diagnosis. The second evaluation assigned a cytologic diagnosis to each cell in the specimen. The fluorescence results were correlated with those from each of the two morphologic evaluations to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the method on a per-specimen and a per-cell basis. Where available, in cases of positive morphologic analysis, biopsy was compared to fluorescence results. RESULTS: The per-specimen sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 81.8%, respectively, when using atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and "above" as the decision threshold. For the same specimens evaluated on a cell-by-cell basis, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 71.4% and 66.3% when the same threshold was used. The per-specimen sensitivity for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was 100% under these conditions. CONCLUSION: This method appears to be a robust and reliable means of detecting cervical dysplasia and is now being evaluated in additional clinical studies.     

Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is characterize by few early symptoms, presentation at an advanced stage, and poor survival. As a result, it is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological cancer. During the last decade, a research effort has been directed toward improving outcomes for ovarian cancer by screening for preclinical, early stage disease using both imaging techniques and serum markers. Numerous biomarkers have shown potential in samples from clinically diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, but few have been thoroughly assessed in preclinical disease and screening. The most thoroughly investigated biomarker in ovarian cancer screening is CA125. Prospective studies have demonstrated that both CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound can detect a significant proportion of preclinical ovarian cancers, and refinements in interpretation of results have improved sensitivity and reduced the false-positive rate of screening. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from ovarian cancer is still unclear. Prospective studies of screening are in progress in both the general population and high-risk population, including the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), a randomized trial involving 200,000 postmenopausal women designed to document the impact of screening on mortality. Recent advances in technology for the study of the serum proteome offer exciting opportunities for the identification of novel biomarkers or patterns of markers that will have greater sensitivity and lead time for preclinical disease than CA125. Considerable interest and controversy has been generated by initial results utilizing surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) in ovarian cancer. There are challenging issues related to the design of studies to evaluate SELDI and other proteomic technology, as well as the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of this new technology. Large serum banks such as that assembled in UKCTOCS, which contain preclinical samples from patients who later developed ovarian cancer and other disorders, provide a unique resource for carefully designed studies of proteomic technology. There is a sound basis for optimism that further developments in serum proteomic analysis will provide powerful methods for screening in ovarian cancer and many other diseases.     

Defining a mutational signature for endometrial cancer screening and early detection

IntroductionThe current availability of genomic information represents an opportunity to develop new strategies for early detection of cancer. New molecular tests for endometrial cancer may improve performance and failure rates of histological aspirate-based diagnosis, and provide promising perspectives for a potential screening scenario. However, the selection of relevant biomarkers to develop efficient strategies can be a challenge.Materials and methodsWe developed an algorithm to identify the largest number of patients with endometrial cancer using the minimum number of somatic mutations based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset.ResultsThe algorithm provided the number of subjects with mutations (sensitivity) for a given number of biomarkers included in the signature. For instance, by evaluating the 50 most representative point mutations, up to 81.9% of endometrial cancers can be identified in the TCGA dataset. At gene level, a 92.9% sensitivity can be obtained by interrogating five genes.DiscussionWe developed a computational method to aid in the selection of relevant genomic biomarkers in endometrial cancer that can be adapted to other cancer types or diseases.     

Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result

Background: False-positives are a major concern in breast cancer screening. However, false-positives have been little evaluated as a prognostic factor for cancer detection. Our aim was to evaluate the association of false-positive results with the cancer detection risk in subsequent screening participations over a 17-year period. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 762,506 women aged 45–69 years, with at least two screening participations, who underwent 2,594,146 screening mammograms from 1990 to 2006. Multilevel discrete-time hazard models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of breast cancer detection in subsequent screening participations in women with false-positive results. Results: False-positives involving a fine-needle aspiration cytology or a biopsy had a higher cancer detection risk than those involving additional imaging procedures alone (OR = 2.69; 95%CI: 2.28–3.16 and OR = 1.81; 95%CI: 1.70–1.94, respectively). The risk of cancer detection increased substantially if women with cytology or biopsy had a familial history of breast cancer (OR = 4.64; 95%CI: 3.23–6.66). Other factors associated with an increased cancer detection risk were age 65–69 years (OR = 1.84; 95%CI: 1.67–2.03), non-attendance at the previous screening invitation (OR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.11–1.43), and having undergone a previous benign biopsy outside the screening program (OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.13–1.35). Conclusion: Women with a false-positive test have an increased risk of cancer detection in subsequent screening participations, especially those with a false-positive result involving cytology or biopsy. Understanding the factors behind this association could provide valuable information to increase the effectiveness of breast cancer screening.     

乳腺癌早期筛查和诊断生物标志物研究进展

2020年全球乳腺癌(breast cancer,BC)新发病例达226万例,占全部肿瘤新发病例的11.7%,是全世界发病率最高的癌症。早期发现、早期诊断和早期治疗是降低乳腺癌死亡率及改善预后的关键。尽管乳房X光筛查被广泛用作乳腺癌筛查的工具,但其假阳性、辐射性和过度诊断仍是亟待解决的问题。因此,亟需开发易于获取且稳定可靠的生物标志物,用于乳腺癌无创筛查和诊断。近年来多项研究显示来自乳腺癌患者血液中的循环肿瘤细胞DNA(circulating tumor cell DNA,ctDNA)、癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、糖类抗原15-3(carbohydrate antigen 15-3,CA15-3)、细胞外囊泡(extracellular vesicles,EV)、循环miRNA和BRCA基因突变等生物标志物,以及来自人体尿液、呼出气体(volatile organic compounds,VOCs)和乳头吸出液(nipple aspirate fluid,NAF)中的磷脂、miRNA、苯乙酮和十六烷等多种生物标志物与乳腺癌早期筛查和诊断密切相关。本文综述了上述生物标志物在乳腺癌早期筛查和诊断中的应用。     

Autoantibody signatures: progress and perspectives for early cancer detection

Becoming invasive is a crucial step in cancer development, and the early spread of tumour cells is usually undetected by current imaging technologies. In patients with cancer and no signs of overt metastases, sensitive methods have been developed to identify circulating autoantibodies and their antigen counterparts in several cancers. These technologies are often based on proteomic approaches, and recent advances in protein and antibody microarrays have greatly facilitated the discovery of new antibody biomarkers in sera from cancer patients. Interestingly, in a clinical application setting, combinations of multiple autoantibody reactivities into panel assays have recently been proposed as relevant screening tests and validated in several independent trials. In addition, autoantibody signatures seem to be particularly relevant for early detection of cancer in high-risk cancer patients. In this review, we highlight the concept that immunogenic epitopes associated with the humoural response and key pathogenic pathways elicit serum autoantibodies that can be considered as relevant cancer biomarkers. We outline the proteomic strategies employed to identify and validate their use in clinical practice for cancer screening and diagnosis. We particularly emphasize the clinical utility of autoantibody signatures in several cancers. Finally, we discuss the challenges remaining for clinical validation.     

Proteomics for early detection of colorectal cancer: recent updates

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common type of cancer with a relatively poor survival rate. The survival rate of patients could be improved if CRC is detected early. Biomarkers associated with early stages of tumor development might provide useful tools for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Areas covered: Online searches using PubMed and Google Scholar were performed using keywords and with a focus on recent proteomic studies. The aim of this review is to highlight the need for biomarkers to improve the detection rate of early CRC and provide an overview of proteomic technologies used for biomarker discovery and validation. This review will also discuss recent proteomic studies which focus on identifying biomarkers associated with the early stages of CRC development.

Expert commentary: A large number of CRC biomarkers are increasingly being identified by proteomics using diverse approaches. However, the clinical relevance and introduction of these markers into clinical practice cannot be determined without a robust validation process. The size of validation cohorts remains a major limitation in many biomarker studies.     

Transabdominal ultrasound screening for early ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the value of ultrasonography in a screening procedure for early ovarian cancer. DESIGN--Prospective study of at least 5000 self referred women without symptoms of ovarian cancer. Each woman was scheduled to undergo three annual screenings (consisting of one or more scans) to detect grossly abnormal ovaries or non-regressing masses. SETTING--The ovarian screening clinic at King''s College Hospital, London. SUBJECTS--5479 Self referred women without symptoms (aged 18-78, mean age 52). INTERVENTIONS--Women with a positive result on screening were referred for laparoscopy or laparotomy, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Findings at surgery and from histology of abnormal ovaries. RESULTS--A total of 14,594 screenings (15,977 scans) were performed. A positive result was obtained at 338 screens (2.3%) comprising 326 subjects (5.9%). Five patients with primary ovarian cancer (four stage Ia, one stage Ib; two at first screening three at second) were identified (prevalence 0.09%). An additional four patients had metastatic ovarian cancer (three at first screening, one at second). The apparent detection rate was 100%. It was not possible to differentiate between the ultrasonic appearance of early malignant and benign tumours. The rate of false positive results for primary ovarian cancer was 3.5% at the first screening, 1.8% at the second, and 1.2% at the third. Overall the rate of false positive results was 2.3%; the specificity was 97.7% and the predictive value of a positive result on screening was 1.5%. The odds that a positive result on screening indicated the presence of an ovarian tumour, any ovarian cancer, or primary ovarian cancer were about one to two, one to 37, and one to 67 respectively. CONCLUSION--Ultrasonography can be used to screen women without symptoms for persistent ovarian masses that will include early ovarian cancer.