Innexins form two types of channels

Injury to the central nervous system triggers glial calcium waves in both vertebrates and invertebrates. In vertebrates the pannexin1 ATP-release channel appears to provide for calcium wave initiation and propagation. The innexins, which form invertebrate gap junctions and have sequence similarity with the pannexins, are candidates to form non-junctional membrane channels. Two leech innexins previously demonstrated in glia were expressed in frog oocytes. In addition to making gap junctions, innexins also formed non-junctional membrane channels with properties similar to those of pannexons. In addition, carbenoxolone reversibly blocked the loss of carboxyfluorescein dye into the bath from the giant glial cells in the connectives of the leech nerve cord, which are known to express the innexins we assayed.     

Arachidonic acid closes innexin/pannexin channels and thereby inhibits microglia cell movement to a nerve injury

Pannexons are membrane channels formed by pannexins and are permeable to ATP. They have been implicated in various physiological and pathophysiological processes. Innexins, the invertebrate homologues of the pannexins, form innexons. Nerve injury induces calcium waves in glial cells, releasing ATP through glial pannexon/innexon channels. The ATP then activates microglia. More slowly, injury releases arachidonic acid (ArA). The present experiments show that ArA itself reduced the macroscopic membrane currents of innexin‐ and of pannexin‐injected oocytes; ArA also blocked K⁺‐induced release of ATP. In leeches, whose large glial cells have been favorable for studying control of microglia migration, ArA blocked glial dye‐release and, evidently, ATP‐release. A physiological consequence in the leech was block of microglial migration to nerve injuries. Exogenous ATP (100 µM) reversed the effect, for ATP causes activation and movement of microglia after nerve injury, but nitric oxide directs microglia to the lesion. It was not excluded that metabolites of ArA may also inhibit the channels. But for all these effects, ArA and its non‐metabolizable analog eicosatetraynoic acid (ETYA) were indistinguishable. Therefore, ArA itself is an endogenous regulator of pannexons and innexons. ArA thus blocks release of ATP from glia after nerve injury and thereby, at least in leeches, stops microglia at lesions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 73: 621–631, 2013     

Connexin and pannexin mediated cell-cell communication

In this review, we briefly summarize what is known about the properties of the three families of gap junction proteins, connexins, innexins and pannexins, emphasizing their importance as intercellular channels that provide ionic and metabolic coupling and as non-junctional channels that can function as a paracrine signaling pathway. We discuss that two distinct groups of proteins form gap junctions in deuterostomes (connexins) and protostomes (innexins), and that channels formed of the deuterostome homologues of innexins (pannexins) differ from connexin channels in terms of important structural features and activation properties. These differences indicate that the two families of gap junction proteins serve distinct, complementary functions in deuterostomes. In several tissues, including the CNS, both connexins and pannexins are involved in intercellular communication, but have different roles. Connexins mainly contribute by forming the intercellular gap junction channels, which provide for junctional coupling and define the communication compartments in the CNS. We also provide new data supporting the concept that pannexins form the non-junctional channels that play paracrine roles by releasing ATP and, thus, modulating the range of the intercellular Ca(2+)-wave transmission between astrocytes in culture.     

Neuroglial ATP release through innexin channels controls microglial cell movement to a nerve injury

Microglia, the immune cells of the central nervous system, are attracted to sites of injury. The injury releases adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into the extracellular space, activating the microglia, but the full mechanism of release is not known. In glial cells, a family of physiologically regulated unpaired gap junction channels called innexons (invertebrates) or pannexons (vertebrates) located in the cell membrane is permeable to ATP. Innexons, but not pannexons, also pair to make gap junctions. Glial calcium waves, triggered by injury or mechanical stimulation, open pannexon/innexon channels and cause the release of ATP. It has been hypothesized that a glial calcium wave that triggers the release of ATP causes rapid microglial migration to distant lesions. In the present study in the leech, in which a single giant glial cell ensheathes each connective, hydrolysis of ATP with 10 U/ml apyrase or block of innexons with 10 µM carbenoxolone (CBX), which decreased injury-induced ATP release, reduced both movement of microglia and their accumulation at lesions. Directed movement and accumulation were restored in CBX by adding ATP, consistent with separate actions of ATP and nitric oxide, which is required for directed movement but does not activate glia. Injection of glia with innexin2 (Hminx2) RNAi inhibited release of carboxyfluorescein dye and microglial migration, whereas injection of innexin1 (Hminx1) RNAi did not when measured 2 days after injection, indicating that glial cells’ ATP release through innexons was required for microglial migration after nerve injury. Focal stimulation either mechanically or with ATP generated a calcium wave in the glial cell; injury caused a large, persistent intracellular calcium response. Neither the calcium wave nor the persistent response required ATP or its release. Thus, in the leech, innexin membrane channels releasing ATP from glia are required for migration and accumulation of microglia after nerve injury.     

Pannexin channels are not gap junction hemichannels

Pannexins, a class of membrane channels, bear significant sequence homology with the invertebrate gap junction proteins, innexins and more distant similarities in their membrane topologies and pharmacological sensitivities with the gap junction proteins, connexins. However, the functional role for the pannexin oligomers, or pannexons, is different from connexin oligomers, the connexons. Many pannexin publications have used the term "hemichannels" to describe pannexin oligomers while others use the term "channels" instead. This has led to confusion within the literature about the function of pannexins that promotes the idea that pannexons serve as gap junction hemichannels and thus have an assembly and functional state as gap junctional intercellular channels. Here we present the case that unlike the connexin gap junction intercellular channels, so far, pannexin oligomers have repeatedly been shown to be channels that are functional in single membranes, but not as intercellular channel in appositional membranes. Hence, they should be referred to as channels and not hemichannels. Thus, we advocate that in the absence of firm evidence that pannexins form gap junctions, the use of the term "hemichannel" be discontinued within the pannexin literature.     

Nature of plasmalemmal functional “hemichannels”

The molecular identity of the protein forming “hemichannels” at non-junctional membranes is disputed. The family of gap junction proteins, innexins, connexins, and pannexins share several common features, including permeability characteristics and sensitivity to blocking agents. Such overlap in properties renders the identification of which of these protein species actually establishes the non-junctional membrane conductance and permeability quite complicated, especially because in vertebrates pannexins and connexins have largely overlapping distributions in tissues. Recently, attempts to establish criteria to identify events that are “hemichannel” mediated and those to allow the distinction between connexin- from pannexin-mediated events have been proposed.Here, I present an update on that topic and discuss the most recent findings related to the nature of functional “hemichannels” focusing on connexin43 and pannexin1. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The Communicating junctions, composition, structure and characteristics.     

Pannexin: to gap or not to gap, is that a question?

Vertebrates express two families of gap junction proteins: the well characterized connexins and the recently discovered pannexins. The latter are related to invertebrate innexins. Here we present the hypothesis that pannexins, rather than providing a redundant system to gap junctions formed by connexins, exert a physiological role as nonjunctional membrane channels. Specifically, we propose that pannexins can serve as ATP release channels. This function presumptively is also performed by innexins in invertebrates, in addition to their traditional gap junction role.     

Interactions of Pannexin1 channels with purinergic and NMDA receptor channels

Pannexins are a three-member family of vertebrate plasma membrane spanning molecules that have homology to the invertebrate gap junction forming proteins, the innexins. However, pannexins do not form gap junctions but operate as plasma membrane channels. The best-characterized member of these proteins, Pannexin1 (Panx1) was suggested to be functionally associated with purinergic P2X and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channels. Activation of these receptor channels by their endogenous ligands leads to cross-activation of Panx1 channels. This in turn potentiates P2X and NMDA receptor channel signaling. Two potentiation concepts have been suggested: enhancement of the current responses and/or sustained receptor channel activation by ATP released through Panx1 pore and adenosine generated by ectonucleotidase-dependent dephosphorylation of ATP. Here we summarize the current knowledge and hypotheses about interactions of Panx1 channels with P2X and NMDA receptor channels. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Gap Junction Proteins edited by Jean Claude Herve.     

Gap junction gene and protein families: Connexins,innexins, and pannexins

Gap junction channels facilitate the intercellular exchange of ions and small molecules. While this process is critical to all multicellular organisms, the proteins that form gap junction channels are not conserved. Vertebrate gap junctions are formed by connexins, while invertebrate gap junctions are formed by innexins. Interestingly, vertebrates and lower chordates contain innexin homologs, the pannexins, which also form channels, but rarely (if ever) make intercellular channels. While the connexin and the innexin/pannexin polypeptides do not share significant sequence similarity, all three of these protein families share a similar membrane topology and some similarities in quaternary structure. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Gap Junction Proteins edited by Jean Claude Herve.     

Pannexin-1 as a potentiator of ligand-gated receptor signaling

Pannexins are a class of plasma membrane spanning proteins that presumably form a hexameric, non-selective ion channel. Although similar in secondary structure to the connexins, pannexins notably do not form endogenous gap junctions and act as bona fide ion channels. The pannexins have been primarily studied as ATP-release channels, but the overall diversity of their functions is still being elucidated. There is an intriguing theme with pannexins that has begun to develop. In this review we analyze several recent reports that converge on the idea that pannexin channels (namely Panx1) can potentiate ligand-gated receptor signaling. Although the literature remains sparse, this emerging concept appears consistent between both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors of several ligand families.     

Pannexin-1 as a potentiator of ligand-gated receptor signaling

Pannexins are a class of plasma membrane spanning proteins that presumably form a hexameric, non-selective ion channel. Although similar in secondary structure to the connexins, pannexins notably do not form endogenous gap junctions and act as bona fide ion channels. The pannexins have been primarily studied as ATP-release channels, but the overall diversity of their functions is still being elucidated. There is an intriguing theme with pannexins that has begun to develop. In this review we analyze several recent reports that converge on the idea that pannexin channels (namely Panx1) can potentiate ligand-gated receptor signaling. Although the literature remains sparse, this emerging concept appears consistent between both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors of several ligand families.     

Cell junctions and other membrane specializations in the ocellus of the wasp,Paravespula Germanica L. (Hymenoptera : Vespidae)

Five types of cell contacts and other membrane specializations were found in the ocellus of the adult wasp, Paravespula germanica L. (Hymenoptera : Vespidae), based on freeze-fracture replicas and thin sections.Septate junctions alongside small gap junctions are present between iris cells and between corneagenous cells. Gap junctions are sometimes observed between glial cell processes. Photoreceptor cells and glial cells are frequently connected by scalariform junctions. Tight junction-like structures are found on receptor-cell membranes near rhabdomeric microvilli. Desmosomes are widespread in the ocellus, connecting iris cells, corneagenous cells, receptor cells, and glial cell processes. Desmosomes are found next to septate junctions.Glial membranes connected to receptor cells have a non-junctional type of membrane specializations, consisting of intramembraneous particles arranged in a rhombic pattern. Interestingly, both particle arrays and scalariform junctions are often adjacent to each other. Furthermore, a conspicuous modification of the cell surface in freeze cleaved cells is seen between adjacent glial cells intermediating two receptor cells.     

Nature of plasmalemmal functional "hemichannels"

The molecular identity of the protein forming "hemichannels" at non-junctional membranes is disputed. The family of gap junction proteins, innexins, connexins, and pannexins share several common features, including permeability characteristics and sensitivity to blocking agents. Such overlap in properties renders the identification of which of these protein species actually establishes the non-junctional membrane conductance and permeability quite complicated, especially because in vertebrates pannexins and connexins have largely overlapping distributions in tissues. Recently, attempts to establish criteria to identify events that are "hemichannel" mediated and those to allow the distinction between connexin- from pannexin-mediated events have been proposed. Here, I present an update on that topic and discuss the most recent findings related to the nature of functional "hemichannels" focusing on connexin43 and pannexin1. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The Communicating junctions, composition, structure and characteristics.     

Gap-junction-mediated cell-to-cell communication

Cells of multicellular organisms need to communicate with each other and have evolved various mechanisms for this purpose, the most direct and quickest of which is through channels that directly connect the cytoplasms of adjacent cells. Such intercellular channels span the two plasma membranes and the intercellular space and result from the docking of two hemichannels. These channels are densely packed into plasma-membrane spatial microdomains termed “gap junctions” and allow cells to exchange ions and small molecules directly. A hemichannel is a hexameric torus of junctional proteins around an aqueous pore. Vertebrates express two families of gap-junction proteins: the well-characterized connexins and the more recently discovered pannexins, the latter being related to invertebrate innexins (“invertebrate connexins”). Some gap-junctional hemichannels also appear to mediate cell-extracellular communication. Communicating junctions play crucial roles in the maintenance of homeostasis, morphogenesis, cell differentiation and growth control in metazoans. Gap-junctional channels are not passive conduits, as previously long regarded, but use “gating” mechanisms to open and close the central pore in response to biological stimuli (e.g. a change in the transjunctional voltage). Their permeability is finely tuned by complex mechanisms that have just begun to be identified. Given their ubiquity and diversity, gap junctions play crucial roles in a plethora of functions and their dysfunctions are involved in a wide range of diseases. However, the exact mechanisms involved remain poorly understood.     

ATP transporters in the joints

Extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) plays a central role in a wide variety of joint diseases. ATP is generated intracellularly, and the concentration of the extracellular ATP pool is determined by the regulation of its transport out of the cell. A variety of ATP transporters have been described, with connexins and pannexins the most commonly cited. Both form intercellular channels, known as gap junctions, that facilitate the transport of various small molecules between cells and mediate cell–cell communication. Connexins and pannexins also form pores, or hemichannels, that are permeable to certain molecules, including ATP. All joint tissues express one or more connexins and pannexins, and their expression is altered in some pathological conditions, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), indicating that they may be involved in the onset and progression of these pathologies. The aging of the global population, along with increases in the prevalence of obesity and metabolic dysfunction, is associated with a rising frequency of joint diseases along with the increased costs and burden of related illness. The modulation of connexins and pannexins represents an attractive therapeutic target in joint disease, but their complex regulation, their combination of gap-junction-dependent and -independent functions, and their interplay between gap junction and hemichannel formation are not yet fully elucidated. In this review, we try to shed light on the regulation of these proteins and their roles in ATP transport to the extracellular space in the context of joint disease, and specifically OA and RA.     

Distribution of Connexin50 Channels and Hemichannels in Lens Fibers: A Structural Approach

A detailed understanding of the mechanisms regulating cell-to-cell communication in the lens necessitates information about the distribution and density of Cx46 and Cx50 in their native cellular environment. These isoforms constitute the extensive pathway between the lens surface and the interior, helping to maintain its striking optical properties. To identify Cx50 channels and hemichannels in the plasma membrane and to differentiate between them, immuno-freeze-fracture-labeling (FRIL) with immuno-gold particles in used. In equatorial lens fibers, the Cx50-gold complexes label gap junctions at high densities and non-junctional plasma membranes at lower densities. Small depressions in the non-junctional plasma membrane labeled by the gold-complexes most likely represent points of hemichannel insertion. Measurement of the width of the extra-cellular space separating adjacent plasma membranes indicates that the gold complexes in the gap junctions represent Cx50 channels and those in the non-junctional plasma membrane, Cx50 hemichannels. Estimates of their densities indicate that the channels are at least one order of magnitude more numerous than the hemichannels. Therefore, in lens fibers, Cx50 hemichannels are inserted via exocytosis and are rapidly assembled into channels assembled in gap junction plaques.     

Distribution of Connexin50 Channels and Hemichannels in Lens Fibers: A Structural Approach

A detailed understanding of the mechanisms regulating cell-to-cell communication in the lens necessitates information about the distribution and density of Cx46 and Cx50 in their native cellular environment. These isoforms constitute the extensive pathway between the lens surface and the interior, helping to maintain its striking optical properties. To identify Cx50 channels and hemichannels in the plasma membrane and to differentiate between them, immuno-freeze-fracture-labeling (FRIL) with immuno-gold particles in used. In equatorial lens fibers, the Cx50-gold complexes label gap junctions at high densities and non-junctional plasma membranes at lower densities. Small depressions in the non-junctional plasma membrane labeled by the gold-complexes most likely represent points of hemichannel insertion. Measurement of the width of the extra-cellular space separating adjacent plasma membranes indicates that the gold complexes in the gap junctions represent Cx50 channels and those in the non-junctional plasma membrane, Cx50 hemichannels. Estimates of their densities indicate that the channels are at least one order of magnitude more numerous than the hemichannels. Therefore, in lens fibers, Cx50 hemichannels are inserted via exocytosis and are rapidly assembled into channels assembled in gap junction plaques.     

Changes in the blood-brain barrier of the central nervous system in the blowfly during development, with special reference to the formation and disaggregation of gap and tight junctions. I. Larval development

In the central nervous system (CNS) of full-grown larvae of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala, the glial-ensheathed nerve cells are completely surrounded by a layer of perineurial cells which form a “blood-brain barrier” between the circulating haemolymph and the CNS. A variety of intercellular junctions, including gap and tight junctions, are found between adjacent perineurial cells and some also between apposing glial cells; these have been characterized by freeze-fracturing as well as by tracer studies and analysis of thin sections. They are found not to be present between such cells in the undifferentiated CNS in the newly hatched larvae, nor are the nerve cells encompassed by glial cells; ionic lanthanum can penetrate to the axonal surfaces at this stage. However, over the 5 days of larval growth and development the glial cells produce attentuated cytoplasmic processes that ensheath the nerve cells, and the perineurium is formed; junctional complexes are assembled and a larval blood-brain barrier is produced which excludes tracers. Freeze-fracture preparations suggest that the inverted gap junctions which develop have done so by migration of individual intramembranous EF particles to form, at first, linear arrays and small clusters and, ultimately, macular aggregations in the perineurium; these lie between the undulating rows of PF particles forming the septate junctions. These septate junctions are formed by the organization of arrays of PF particles into multiple rows. Extensive PF particles fusing into ridges with EF grooves to form perineurial “tight” junctions are also observed, seemingly in the process of development; entry of exogenous lanthanum followed by its exclusion parallels the completion of ridge formation. These ridges are simple linear arrays of particles which may be discontinuous, lying in parallel with one another and the surface. Clustered particle arrays as well as scattered short ridges on the axonal PF, however, appear to be present unchanged throughout larval life; their role may therefore be associated with neural membrane function although there are suggestions that some may form axo-glial junctions. This is the first report on the lateral migration of intramembranous particles as the mode of formation of gap junctions in the nervous system of an invertebrate.     

Distribution of connexin50 channels and hemichannels in lens fibers: a structural approach

A detailed understanding of the mechanisms regulating cell-to-cell communication in the lens necessitates information about the distribution and density of Cx46 and Cx50 in their native cellular environment. These isoforms constitute the extensive pathway between the lens surface and the interior, helping to maintain its striking optical properties. To identify Cx50 channels and hemichannels in the plasma membrane and to differentiate between them, immuno-freeze-fracture-labeling (FRIL) with immuno-gold particles in used. In equatorial lens fibers, the Cx50-gold complexes label gap junctions at high densities and non-junctional plasma membranes at lower densities. Small depressions in the non-junctional plasma membrane labeled by the gold-complexes most likely represent points of hemichannel insertion. Measurement of the width of the extra-cellular space separating adjacent plasma membranes indicates that the gold complexes in the gap junctions represent Cx50 channels and those in the non-junctional plasma membrane, Cx50 hemichannels. Estimates of their densities indicate that the channels are at least one order of magnitude more numerous than the hemichannels. Therefore, in lens fibers, Cx50 hemichannels are inserted via exocytosis and are rapidly assembled into channels assembled in gap junction plaques.     

Pannexin1 and Pannexin2 Channels Show Quaternary Similarities to Connexons and Different Oligomerization Numbers from Each Other

Pannexins are homologous to innexins, the invertebrate gap junction family. However, mammalian pannexin1 does not form canonical gap junctions, instead forming hexameric oligomers in single plasma membranes and intracellularly. Pannexin1 acts as an ATP release channel, whereas less is known about the function of Pannexin2. We purified cellular membranes isolated from MDCK cells stably expressing rat Pannexin1 or Pannexin2 and identified pannexin channels (pannexons) in single membranes by negative stain and immunogold labeling. Protein gel and Western blot analysis confirmed Pannexin1 (Panx1) or Pannexin2 (Panx2) as the channel-forming proteins. We expressed and purified Panx1 and Panx2 using a baculovirus Sf9 expression system and obtained doughnut-like structures similar to those seen previously in purified connexin hemichannels (connexons) and mammalian membranes. Purified pannexons were comparable in size and overall appearance to Connexin46 and Connexin50 connexons. Pannexons and connexons were further analyzed by single-particle averaging for oligomer and pore diameters. The oligomer diameter increased with increasing monomer molecular mass, and we found that the measured oligomeric pore diameter for Panxs was larger than for Connexin26. Panx1 and Panx2 formed active homomeric channels in Xenopus oocytes and in vitro vesicle assays. Cross-linking and native gels of purified homomeric full-length and a C-terminal Panx2 truncation mutant showed a banding pattern more consistent with an octamer. We purified Panx1/Panx2 heteromeric channels and found that they were unstable over time, possibly because Panx1 and Panx2 homomeric pannexons have different monomer sizes and oligomeric symmetry from each other.