ICP0 Dismantles Microtubule Networks in Herpes Simplex Virus-Infected Cells

Infected-cell protein 0 (ICP0) is a RING finger E3 ligase that regulates herpes simplex virus (HSV) mRNA synthesis, and strongly influences the balance between latency and replication of HSV. For 25 years, the nuclear functions of ICP0 have been the subject of intense scrutiny. To obtain new clues about ICP0''s mechanism of action, we constructed HSV-1 viruses that expressed GFP-tagged ICP0. To our surprise, both GFP-tagged and wild-type ICP0 were predominantly observed in the cytoplasm of HSV-infected cells. Although ICP0 is exclusively nuclear during the immediate-early phase of HSV infection, further analysis revealed that ICP0 translocated to the cytoplasm during the early phase where it triggered a previously unrecognized process; ICP0 dismantled the microtubule network of the host cell. A RING finger mutant of ICP0 efficiently bundled microtubules, but failed to disperse microtubule bundles. Synthesis of ICP0 proved to be necessary and sufficient to disrupt microtubule networks in HSV-infected and transfected cells. Plant and animal viruses encode many proteins that reorganize microtubules. However, this is the first report of a viral E3 ligase that regulates microtubule stability. Intriguingly, several cellular E3 ligases orchestrate microtubule disassembly and reassembly during mitosis. Our results suggest that ICP0 serves a dual role in the HSV life cycle, acting first as a nuclear regulator of viral mRNA synthesis and acting later, in the cytoplasm, to dismantle the host cell''s microtubule network in preparation for virion synthesis and/or egress.     

The human telomeric proteome during telomere replication

Telomere shortening can cause detrimental diseases and contribute to aging. It occurs due to the end replication problem in cells lacking telomerase. Furthermore, recent studies revealed that telomere shortening can be attributed to difficulties of the semi-conservative DNA replication machinery to replicate the bulk of telomeric DNA repeats. To investigate telomere replication in a comprehensive manner, we develop QTIP-iPOND - Quantitative Telomeric chromatin Isolation Protocol followed by isolation of Proteins On Nascent DNA - which enables purification of proteins that associate with telomeres specifically during replication. In addition to the core replisome, we identify a large number of proteins that specifically associate with telomere replication forks. Depletion of several of these proteins induces telomere fragility validating their importance for telomere replication. We also find that at telomere replication forks the single strand telomere binding protein POT1 is depleted, whereas histone H1 is enriched. Our work reveals the dynamic changes of the telomeric proteome during replication, providing a valuable resource of telomere replication proteins. To our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the replisome at a specific region of the genome.     

A Unique Role for the Host ESCRT Proteins in Replication of Tomato bushy stunt virus

Plus-stranded RNA viruses replicate in infected cells by assembling viral replicase complexes consisting of viral- and host-coded proteins. Previous genome-wide screens with Tomato bushy stunt tombusvirus (TBSV) in a yeast model host revealed the involvement of seven ESCRT (endosomal sorting complexes required for transport) proteins in viral replication. In this paper, we show that the expression of dominant negative Vps23p, Vps24p, Snf7p, and Vps4p ESCRT factors inhibited virus replication in the plant host, suggesting that tombusviruses co-opt selected ESCRT proteins for the assembly of the viral replicase complex. We also show that TBSV p33 replication protein interacts with Vps23p ESCRT-I and Bro1p accessory ESCRT factors. The interaction with p33 leads to the recruitment of Vps23p to the peroxisomes, the sites of TBSV replication. The viral replicase showed reduced activity and the minus-stranded viral RNA in the replicase became more accessible to ribonuclease when derived from vps23Δ or vps24Δ yeast, suggesting that the protection of the viral RNA is compromised within the replicase complex assembled in the absence of ESCRT proteins. The recruitment of ESCRT proteins is needed for the precise assembly of the replicase complex, which might help the virus evade recognition by the host defense surveillance system and/or prevent viral RNA destruction by the gene silencing machinery.     

Noncanonical Role for the Host Vps4 AAA+ ATPase ESCRT Protein in the Formation of Tomato Bushy Stunt Virus Replicase

Assembling of the membrane-bound viral replicase complexes (VRCs) consisting of viral- and host-encoded proteins is a key step during the replication of positive-stranded RNA viruses in the infected cells. Previous genome-wide screens with Tomato bushy stunt tombusvirus (TBSV) in a yeast model host have revealed the involvement of eleven cellular ESCRT (endosomal sorting complexes required for transport) proteins in viral replication. The ESCRT proteins are involved in endosomal sorting of cellular membrane proteins by forming multiprotein complexes, deforming membranes away from the cytosol and, ultimately, pinching off vesicles into the lumen of the endosomes. In this paper, we show an unexpected key role for the conserved Vps4p AAA+ ATPase, whose canonical function is to disassemble the ESCRT complexes and recycle them from the membranes back to the cytosol. We find that the tombusvirus p33 replication protein interacts with Vps4p and three ESCRT-III proteins. Interestingly, Vps4p is recruited to become a permanent component of the VRCs as shown by co-purification assays and immuno-EM. Vps4p is co-localized with the viral dsRNA and contacts the viral (+)RNA in the intracellular membrane. Deletion of Vps4p in yeast leads to the formation of crescent-like membrane structures instead of the characteristic spherule and vesicle-like structures. The in vitro assembled tombusvirus replicase based on cell-free extracts (CFE) from vps4Δ yeast is highly nuclease sensitive, in contrast with the nuclease insensitive replicase in wt CFE. These data suggest that the role of Vps4p and the ESCRT machinery is to aid building the membrane-bound VRCs, which become nuclease-insensitive to avoid the recognition by the host antiviral surveillance system and the destruction of the viral RNA. Other (+)RNA viruses of plants and animals might also subvert Vps4p and the ESCRT machinery for formation of VRCs, which require membrane deformation and spherule formation.     

Identification of Rep-Associated Factors in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1-Induced Adeno-Associated Virus Type 2 Replication Compartments

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that replicates only in cells coinfected with a helper virus, such as adenovirus or herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). We previously showed that nine HSV-1 factors are able to support AAV rep gene expression and genome replication. To elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis of cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and thus potentially recruited within AAV replication compartments (AAV RCs). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism represented the largest functional categories. Validation analyses indicated that the cellular DNA replication enzymes RPA, RFC, and PCNA were recruited within HSV-1-induced AAV RCs. Polymerase δ was not identified but subsequently was shown to colocalize with Rep within AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, we found that AAV replication is associated with the recruitment of components of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex, Ku70 and -86, and the mismatch repair proteins MSH2, -3, and -6. Finally, several HSV-1 factors were also found to be associated with Rep, including UL12. We demonstrated for the first time that this protein plays a role during AAV replication by enhancing the resolution of AAV replicative forms and AAV particle production. Altogether, these analyses provide the basis to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that is currently used as a gene transfer vector (14). AAV particles consist of a small icosahedral capsid protecting a single 4.7-kb single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome with two open reading frames, rep and cap, surrounded by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). The ITRs are the only sequences required in cis for genome replication and packaging. The rep gene encodes four nonstructural Rep proteins: Rep78, -68, -52, and -40. The two larger isoforms, Rep78 and -68, have origin binding, helicase, and site-specific endonuclease activities and are involved in AAV gene expression and genome processing, including replication and site-specific integration (39). The two smaller Rep isoforms are not required for AAV DNA replication but are involved in the control of viral gene expression and packaging of viral DNA (30).When wild-type (wt) AAV infects a cell in the absence of a helper virus, it enters latency. Latent AAV genomes persist in cells either as episomes or as integrated genomes, preferentially at a specific locus (named AAVS1) on human chromosome 19. In most instances, no detectable viral gene expression or genome replication occurs unless the cell is co- or superinfected by a helper virus, such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), or HSV-2. Under these conditions, AAV replication and assembly take place in large intranuclear domains called replication compartments (RCs) that frequently colocalize with replication domains formed by the helper virus itself (81). The viral genome replicates by leading-strand synthesis and generates new ssDNA molecules by a strand displacement mechanism that occurs after strand- and site-specific cleavage of viral DNA by Rep78/68 within the ITRs (39).Studies conducted on the relationship between AAV and its helper viruses are important not only to identify helper activities that can be used to produce recombinant AAV vectors but also to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the helper virus and to the nuclear environment in general. Adenovirus helper functions have historically been the first and most extensively studied functions. These studies have shown that adenovirus helps AAV by stimulating viral gene expression and by enhancing AAV genome replication, mostly indirectly (19). Indeed, early studies showed that the adenovirus polymerase (E2b) is dispensable for AAV replication (8) and that the viral DNA-binding protein (DBP), the product of the E2a gene, is able to modestly enhance the processivity of AAV genome replication in vitro (77). More recently, the adenovirus proteins E1b55k and E4orf6 were shown to stimulate AAV genome replication by degrading the cellular Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex that restricts AAV genome replication during adenovirus coinfection (32). The concept that AAV genome replication can rely mostly, if not uniquely, on direct help from cellular factors was further strengthened by the demonstration that purified proteins such as replication protein A (RPA), replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, and DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) were sufficient to replicate the AAV genome in vitro in the presence of Rep (40-41, 43). The involvement of these cellular proteins during AAV genome replication was also confirmed by the proteomic analysis of factors associated with Rep proteins during adenovirus-induced AAV replication (42).Interestingly, studies conducted on HSV-1 helper activities suggest that the strategy of AAV replication may vary depending on the helper virus. Indeed, previous studies showed that the HSV-1 helicase-primase (HP) complex (UL5/8/52) and DBP (ICP8) could replicate transfected AAV-2 plasmids (80) and that the helicase activity, but not primase activity, of the HP complex was required for this effect (62, 66). More recently, a comprehensive study of HSV-1 helper activities demonstrated that the HSV-1 immediate-early proteins ICP0, ICP4, and ICP22 could stimulate rep gene expression, probably by diminishing intrinsic antiviral effects (1, 18). In addition, the HSV-1 DNA polymerase encoded by UL30, along with its associated processivity factor (UL42), although not strictly required, was demonstrated to significantly increase AAV replication levels induced in the presence of the HP complex and ICP8. Interestingly, the HSV-1 HP complex, DBP, and polymerase were also shown to be sufficient to replicate AAV DNA in vitro in the presence of Rep proteins without any cellular protein (78). Altogether, these observations indicate that in the context of an HSV-1 coinfection, AAV relies extensively on viral activities provided by the helper that directly participate in AAV genome replication.To further elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis to identify the cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and, consequently, potentially recruited within AAV RCs. To analyze Rep-associated proteins in the presence and absence of HSV-1 DNA replication, this analysis was performed using wt HSV-1 and an HSV-1 mutant in which the DNA polymerase encoded by the UL30 gene is absent (HSVΔUL30). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which the largest functional categories corresponded to factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism. Immunofluorescence analyses confirmed that in the presence of HSV-1, a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes, including RPA, RFC, and PCNA, was recruited within AAV RCs, with the exception of the MCM helicases. The cellular DNA polymerases, in particular Pol δ, were not identified by this analysis but subsequently were shown to be recruited in AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, our results indicate that AAV replication induced by HSV-1 is associated with the recruitment of DNA repair factors, including components of the MRN complex, the Ku proteins, PARP-1, and factors of the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. Finally, several HSV-1 proteins, most notably the UL12 protein, were also identified within AAV RCs. Our analyses confirmed the association between UL12 and Rep and demonstrated for the first time that this viral exonuclease plays a critical role during AAV replication by enhancing the formation of discrete AAV replicative forms and the production of AAV particles.Altogether, these results indicate that in the presence of HSV-1, AAV may replicate by using a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes but also relies extensively on HSV-1-derived proteins for its replication, including UL12, a newly discovered helper factor. These results suggest that AAV may be able to differentially adapt its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.     

SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 unique domain SUD interacts with guanine quadruplexes and G4-ligands inhibit this interaction

The multidomain non-structural protein 3 (Nsp3) is the largest protein encoded by coronavirus (CoV) genomes and several regions of this protein are essential for viral replication. Of note, SARS-CoV Nsp3 contains a SARS-Unique Domain (SUD), which can bind Guanine-rich non-canonical nucleic acid structures called G-quadruplexes (G4) and is essential for SARS-CoV replication. We show herein that the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 protein also contains a SUD domain that interacts with G4s. Indeed, interactions between SUD proteins and both DNA and RNA G4s were evidenced by G4 pull-down, Surface Plasmon Resonance and Homogenous Time Resolved Fluorescence. These interactions can be disrupted by mutations that prevent oligonucleotides from folding into G4 structures and, interestingly, by molecules known as specific ligands of these G4s. Structural models for these interactions are proposed and reveal significant differences with the crystallographic and modeled 3D structures of the SARS-CoV SUD-NM/G4 interaction. Altogether, our results pave the way for further studies on the role of SUD/G4 interactions during SARS-CoV-2 replication and the use of inhibitors of these interactions as potential antiviral compounds.     

Inactivation of the Host Lipin Gene Accelerates RNA Virus Replication through Viral Exploitation of the Expanded Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane

RNA viruses take advantage of cellular resources, such as membranes and lipids, to assemble viral replicase complexes (VRCs) that drive viral replication. The host lipins (phosphatidate phosphatases) are particularly interesting because these proteins play key roles in cellular decisions about membrane biogenesis versus lipid storage. Therefore, we examined the relationship between host lipins and tombusviruses, based on yeast model host. We show that deletion of PAH1 (phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase), which is the single yeast homolog of the lipin gene family of phosphatidate phosphatases, whose inactivation is responsible for proliferation and expansion of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, facilitates robust RNA virus replication in yeast. We document increased tombusvirus replicase activity in pah1Δ yeast due to the efficient assembly of VRCs. We show that the ER membranes generated in pah1Δ yeast is efficiently subverted by this RNA virus, thus emphasizing the connection between host lipins and RNA viruses. Thus, instead of utilizing the peroxisomal membranes as observed in wt yeast and plants, TBSV readily switches to the vastly expanded ER membranes in lipin-deficient cells to build VRCs and support increased level of viral replication. Over-expression of the Arabidopsis Pah2p in Nicotiana benthamiana decreased tombusvirus accumulation, validating that our findings are also relevant in a plant host. Over-expression of AtPah2p also inhibited the ER-based replication of another plant RNA virus, suggesting that the role of lipins in RNA virus replication might include several more eukaryotic viruses.     

Degradation of Phosphorylated p53 by Viral Protein-ECS E3 Ligase Complex

p53-signaling is modulated by viruses to establish a host cellular environment advantageous for their propagation. The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic program induces phosphorylation of p53, which prevents interaction with MDM2. Here, we show that induction of EBV lytic program leads to degradation of p53 via an ubiquitin-proteasome pathway independent of MDM2. The BZLF1 protein directly functions as an adaptor component of the ECS (Elongin B/C-Cul2/5-SOCS-box protein) ubiquitin ligase complex targeting p53 for degradation. Intringuingly, C-terminal phosphorylation of p53 resulting from activated DNA damage response by viral lytic replication enhances its binding to BZLF1 protein. Purified BZLF1 protein-associated ECS could be shown to catalyze ubiquitination of phospho-mimetic p53 more efficiently than the wild-type in vitro. The compensation of p53 at middle and late stages of the lytic infection inhibits viral DNA replication and production during lytic infection, suggesting that the degradation of p53 is required for efficient viral propagation. Taken together, these findings demonstrate a role for the BZLF1 protein-associated ECS ligase complex in regulation of p53 phosphorylated by activated DNA damage signaling during viral lytic infection.     

ATR and ATRIP Are Recruited to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Replication Compartments Even though ATR Signaling Is Disabled

Although the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) genome might be expected to induce a DNA damage response, the ATR kinase is not activated in infected cells. We previously proposed that spatial uncoupling of ATR from its interaction partner, ATRIP, could be the basis for inactivation of the ATR kinase in infected cells; however, we now show that ATR and ATRIP are in fact both recruited to HSV-1 replication compartments and can be coimmunoprecipitated from infected-cell lysates. ATRIP and replication protein A (RPA) are recruited to the earliest detectable prereplicative sites, stage II microfoci. In a normal cellular DNA damage response, ATR/ATRIP are recruited to stretches of RPA-coated single-stranded DNA in an RPA- and kinase-dependent manner, resulting in the phosphorylation of RPA by ATR in damage foci. In contrast, in HSV-1-infected cells, RPA is not phosphorylated, and endogenous phosphorylated RPA is excluded from stage II microfoci; in addition, the recruitment of ATR/ATRIP is independent of RPA and the kinase activity of ATR. Furthermore, we show that ATR/ATRIP play a beneficial role in viral gene expression and virus production. Although ICP0 has been shown to be important for partial inactivation of other cellular DNA repair pathways, we show that ICP0 is not responsible for the inactivation of ATR signaling and, furthermore, that neither ATR nor ATRIP is a target of ICP0 degradation. Thus, ATR and ATRIP may function outside the context of the canonical ATR damage signaling pathway during HSV-1 infection to participate in the viral life cycle.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a large linear double-stranded DNA virus that replicates in the nucleus of the host cell. The incoming viral genome contains nicks and gaps (42), and cellular DNA repair machinery might be expected to recognize it as damaged, resulting in the activation of one or more cellular DNA damage pathways. Activation of DNA damage response pathways can result not only in repair of the damaged DNA but also in cell cycle arrest, gene silencing, and apoptosis (9). The later outcomes could result in suppression of viral gene expression and DNA replication and thus have negative consequences for lytic infection. Activation of a cellular DNA damage response during viral infection could, therefore, represent a form of intrinsic antiviral immunity (14, 15). On the other hand, HSV-1 and other DNA viruses which replicate in the nucleus have also been shown to utilize cellular DNA repair machinery to promote productive infection (28). Thus, HSV-1 has apparently evolved to manipulate the host DNA damage response by utilizing some components and inactivating others in an attempt to create an environment conducive to lytic viral infection.The cellular DNA damage response is regulated by the three phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs), DNA-PK (DNA-dependent protein kinase), ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated), and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) (1, 9). DNA-PK and ATM respond predominantly to double-strand breaks, and ATR responds to stalled replication forks and long stretches of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). DNA-PK is required for nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), while ATM activation promotes homologous recombination. Interestingly, in some cell types, the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (DNA-PKcs) is proteolytically degraded during infection by the immediate-early (IE) protein ICP0, a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase (25, 37), thereby resulting in the probable inactivation of the NHEJ pathway. ATM kinase activity, on the other hand, is activated during HSV-1 infection once viral DNA replication is initiated (26, 47, 56). Despite phosphorylation of several ATM targets, ATM signaling is also modulated by ICP0, which degrades the ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168. The function of these ubiquitin ligases is to promote the tethering of ATM pathway proteins at sites of cellular DNA damage (27). Thus, ICP0 functions to partially inactivate portions of both the DNA-PK- and ATM-mediated repair pathways.During a cellular DNA damage response, ATM activation and processing of DNA ends generate ssDNA adjacent to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), a structure that is known to activate ATR (9, 38). The ssDNA is coated by the cellular ssDNA binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), which then serves to recruit ATR through a direct interaction with ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) (4, 12, 58). ATR signaling results in the phosphorylation of many substrates, including RPA and Chk1. During HSV-1 infection, the ATR substrates RPA and Chk1 are not phosphorylated (47, 54-56), indicating that ATR signaling may be disabled.A hallmark of HSV-1 infection is the reorganization of the infected-cell nucleus, resulting in the formation of large globular replication compartments as well as the rearrangement of cellular proteins involved in several homeostatic pathways. In addition to cellular DNA repair proteins, HSV-1 infection also causes the reorganization of components of the cellular protein quality control pathways, resulting in the formation of virus-induced chaperone-enriched (VICE) domains, which act to maintain nuclear protein quality control during infection (31). Viral gene expression, DNA replication, and encapsidation of viral genomes occur in replication compartments (24, 39, 41). In this work we revisit the study of proteins recruited to and restricted from replication compartments in an attempt to better understand how HSV-1 manipulates components of the cellular DNA damage response for its own benefit.     

The molecular complexity of mu and pi symbiont DNA of Paramecium aurelia

The molecular size of mu and pi symbionts of Parameciumaurelia has been calculated from renaturation kinetic data. Observed values were 0.78 × 10⁹ daltons for mu particle DNA and 0.81 × 10⁹ daltons for pi particle DNA. Estimates of analytical complexity were 4.45 × 10⁹ and 5.05 × 10⁹ daltons respectively. Based on these data, mu and pi symbionts appear to possess multiple genomes and contain a minimum of 5 or 6 copies of each DNA sequence.     

Structural basis for the sequence-dependent effects of platinum–DNA adducts

The differences in efficacy and molecular mechanisms of platinum based anti-cancer drugs cisplatin (CP) and oxaliplatin (OX) have been hypothesized to be in part due to the differential binding affinity of cellular and damage recognition proteins to CP and OX adducts formed on adjacent guanines in genomic DNA. HMGB1a in particular exhibits higher binding affinity to CP-GG adducts, and the extent of discrimination between CP- and OX-GG adducts is dependent on the bases flanking the adducts. However, the structural basis for this differential binding is not known. Here, we show that the conformational dynamics of CP- and OX-GG adducts are distinct and depend on the sequence context of the adduct. Molecular dynamics simulations of the Pt-GG adducts in the TGGA sequence context revealed that even though the major conformations of CP- and OX-GG adducts were similar, the minor conformations were distinct. Using the pattern of hydrogen bond formation between the Pt–ammines and the adjacent DNA bases, we identified the major and minor conformations sampled by Pt–DNA. We found that the minor conformations sampled exclusively by the CP-GG adduct exhibit structural properties that favor binding by HMGB1a, which may explain its higher binding affinity to CP-GG adducts, while these conformations are not sampled by OX-GG adducts because of the constraints imposed by its cyclohexane ring, which may explain the negligible binding affinity of HMGB1a for OX-GG adducts in the TGGA sequence context. Based on these results, we postulate that the constraints imposed by the cyclohexane ring of OX affect the DNA conformations explored by OX-GG adduct compared to those of CP-GG adduct, which may influence the binding affinities of HMG-domain proteins for Pt-GG adducts, and that these conformations are further influenced by the DNA sequence context of the Pt-GG adduct.