首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
The theory of sexual conflict predicts that sexual coevolution will be very dynamic, with in principle perpetual evolutionary arms races and chases. These arms races are expected to stop once the costs of conflict adaptations become too high. We argue that this prediction is contingent on specific assumptions about the sexual interaction and the adaptations involved in the arms race. More generally, evolutionary arms races stop when the fitness benefit of further escalations is outweighed by the fitness costs. For this it is not necessary that the absolute costs of conflict must be high at the stable state, or that the population fitness must be decreased at equilibrium. We expect the outcome of sexual antagonistic coevolution to be determined by the possibility to reach compromises and by the relative ability of each sex to control the outcome of the interaction. We exemplify with a theoretical conflict model, which leads to population extinction when conflict is settled by armaments with expression-level determined costs. The model predicts a compromise with small conflict costs for the population, if costs are in addition determined by the extent of conflict between the sexes, which may be the case when the cost depends on behavioural antagonism.  相似文献   

3.
In bonnet macaques, males usually disperse between groups and females remain philopatric, but researchers have reported female transfer. We report a rare case of male influx during the mating season in our bonnet macaque study group in the Anaimalai Hills. The density of bonnet macaques in the study region was unusually high. The study group had a single, crippled adult male with a long tenure and 5 adult females. During the mating season, adult females approached and mated with outgroup males, and then several males entered the group. The adult male left the group without any resistance. The incoming males mated with 3 receptive females, forcibly mated with 2 lactating females, and attacked and killed 2 infants. During the influx, 2 outgroup females joined the group. The data suggest that male influxes provide an opportunity for infanticide and female transfer, which can have important fitness consequences even in species in which they rarely occur.  相似文献   

4.
In contrast to male genitalia that typically exhibit patterns of rapid and divergent evolution among internally fertilizing animals, female genitalia have been less well studied and are generally thought to evolve slowly among closely-related species. As a result, few cases of male-female genital coevolution have been documented. In Drosophila, female copulatory structures have been claimed to be mostly invariant compared to male structures. Here, we re-examined male and female genitalia in the nine species of the D. melanogaster subgroup. We describe several new species-specific female genital structures that appear to coevolve with male genital structures, and provide evidence that the coevolving structures contact each other during copulation. Several female structures might be defensive shields against apparently harmful male structures, such as cercal teeth, phallic hooks and spines. Evidence for male-female morphological coevolution in Drosophila has previously been shown at the post-copulatory level (e.g., sperm length and sperm storage organ size), and our results provide support for male-female coevolution at the copulatory level.  相似文献   

5.
The use of acoustic signals by males during courtship and mating is well known. Nevertheless, their association with female unwillingness to mate is much less studied. In spiders, stridulation during sexual interactions is relatively common in some groups, but mainly restricted to males. In the pholcid spider Holocnemus pluchei, both sexes have stridulatory organs. The aims of the present work were (1) to establish whether female stridulation occurs during intra‐ and inter‐sexual interactions, (2) to determine whether female reproductive status affects the likelihood that she will stridulate and (3) to determine whether female stridulation is influenced by male sexual behaviour. We found that female stridulation usually occurs both during intrasexual interactions and, most frequently, during intersexual interactions. Females with more previous matings stridulated more frequently. Stridulation intensity was higher in females that did not accept new copulations compared with those that copulated. Female stridulation did not vary in elaborated and non‐elaborated courtship. Thus, females use stridulation to communicate levels of sexual receptivity. It is also possible that females use stridulation to indirectly assess male ability to persist and persuade.  相似文献   

6.
Existing models explaining the evolution of sexual dimorphism in the timing of emergence (SDT) in Lepidoptera assume equal mortality rates for males and females. The limiting assumption of equal mortality rates has the consequence that these models are only able to explain the evolution of emergence of males before females, i.e. protandry—the more common temporal sequence of emergence in Lepidoptera. The models fail, however, in providing adaptive explanations for the evolution of protogyny, where females emerge before males, but protogyny is not rare in insects. The assumption of equal mortality rates seems too restrictive for many insects, such as butterflies. To investigate the influence of unequal mortality rates on the evolution of SDT, we present a generalised version of a previously published model where we relax this assumption. We find that longer life-expectancy of females compared to males can indeed favour the evolution of protogyny as a fitness enhancing strategy. Moreover, the encounter rate between females and males and the sex-ratio are two important factors that also influence the evolution of optimal SDT. If considered independently for females and males the predicted strategies can be shown to be evolutionarily stable (ESS). Under the assumption of equal mortality rates the difference between the females’ and males’ ESS remains typically very small. However, female and male ESS may be quite dissimilar if mortality rates are different. This creates the potential for an ‘evolutionary conflict’ between females and males. Bagworm moths (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) provide an exemplary case where life-history attributes are such that protogyny should indeed be the optimal emergence strategy from the males’ and females’ perspectives: (i) Female longevity is considerably larger than that of males, (ii) encounter rates between females and males are presumably low, and (iii) females mate only once. Protogyny is indeed the general mating strategy found in the bagworm family.  相似文献   

7.
Sexual cannibalism is a well-known example for sexual conflict and has many facets that determine the costs and benefits for the cannibal and the victim. Here, I focus on species in which sexual cannibalism is a general component of a mating system in which males invest maximally in mating with a single (monogyny) or two (bigyny) females. Sexual cannibalism can be a male strategy to maximize paternity and a female strategy to prevent paternity monopolization by any or a particular male. Considerable variation exists between species (1) in the potential of males to monopolize females, and (2) in the success of females in preventing monopolization by males. This opens up exciting future possibilities to investigate sexually antagonistic coevolution in a largely unstudied mating system.Sexual cannibalism, the killing and consumption of potential or actual mating partners in a mating context, has been termed a “pinnacle of sexual conflict” because of the dramatic ending of the act for one mating partner, mostly the male (Elgar and Schneider 2004). This contradiction of traditional sex roles may be one reason why the phenomenon of sexual cannibalism has intrigued naturalists for a long time. In the context of sexual conflict, sexually cannibalistic behavior of females is a harmful trait, and antagonistic traits are expected to evolve in males, which can be considered the reverse of most other examples in which females respond to male harm (see Perry and Rowe 2014). I will discuss potential antagonistic traits to sexual cannibalism in males but will also show that the above view is too simplistic when it comes to spider mating systems characterized by very low male mating rates.It is important to note that there are different kinds of sexual cannibalism based on very different evolutionary scenarios (Elgar and Schneider 2004; Prenter et al. 2006; Wilder et al. 2009). The most extreme divide exists between cannibalism before sperm transfer, which can only benefit the cannibal, and sexual cannibalism during or after sperm transfer (from here on termed postinsemination sexual cannibalism), which can benefit the cannibal and the victim (Elgar and Schneider 2004). Despite a longer history of research on preinsemination sexual cannibalism, the evolutionary causes and consequences of postinsemination sexual cannibalism are generally less debated.There are reports (often anecdotal) on the occurrence of sexual cannibalism from diverse invertebrate taxa (Elgar 1992) and it may well occur in all predatory invertebrates that are potentially cannibalistic (Polis 1981). It is beyond the scope of this brief review to list and evaluate all reported occurrences. Rather, I will start with a brief account of the generally discussed causes and consequences of sexual cannibalism and will then concentrate on the conflicting interests of the sexes regarding postinsemination sexual cannibalism in mating systems that are characterized by very low male mating rates.Studies that investigate sexual cannibalism experimentally are mostly concerned with (1) nutritional aspects, (2) the importance of sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection, and, increasingly, (3) behavioral syndromes. The aggressive spillover hypothesis suggests that preinsemination sexual cannibalism is part of a behavioral syndrome in which aggression against mating partners spills over from a foraging context (Arnqvist and Henriksson 1997). There is mixed support for this idea in the few species that have been looked at. In several spider species, females consistently differ in their aggressiveness and these differences affect sexual cannibalism (for a recent debate about the evidence for this hypothesis, see Johnson 2013; Kralj-Fišer et al. 2013b; Pruitt and Keiser 2013).A majority of studies have taken a unilateral view and have been concerned with the “motivation” of the cannibal; because sexual cannibalism generally occurs in predators, hunger is a well-supported motivation (Wilder et al. 2009). Many predators are food-limited, and, assuming a trade-off between foraging and mating, the balance may tilt toward foraging under particular circumstances (modeled by Newman and Elgar 1991). Food and mate availability will influence the costs and benefits of sexual cannibalism for females and have been one focus of a recent review on sexual cannibalism (Wilder et al. 2009).In all predatory and cannibalistic animals, mating partners impose selection on each other’s abilities to avoid or resist aggression. This selection pressure is asymmetrical if one sex is physically dominant. Indeed, the differences in size between females and males often determine the frequency of sexual cannibalism, perhaps because the potential to resist a cannibalistic attack is size-dependent (Elgar 1992; Wilder and Rypstra 2008). Usually, males are the victims and females are the cannibals. Yet, reversed sexual cannibalism has also been reported and appears to be associated with the reversed pattern in sexual size dimorphism. Examples are the water spider, Arygoneta aquatica (Schutz and Taborsky 2005, 2011) and role-reversed wolf spiders (Aisenberg et al. 2011). In the gnaphosid spider, Micaria sociabilis, large, young males cannibalize old and relatively smaller females (Sentenska and Pekar 2013). These examples further support the notion that the relative size differences of a mating pair play a part in determining the likelihood of sexual cannibalism. Patterns can be found both on a between-species comparative scale and on a within-species scale (Wilder and Rypstra 2008; Wilder et al. 2009), and they are also reported as an underlying pattern in cannibalism outside a mating context (Bleakley et al. 2013). Furthermore, there is anecdotal evidence for the same pattern in hermaphrodites (e.g., Goto and Yoshida 1985; Michiels et al. 2003), which may constitute a particularly interesting case to study, as the power asymmetries are less obviously related to the male or female role.In asymmetric encounters, the costs and risks of aggressive behavior toward potential mating partners are low for the dominant partner. Toward smaller males, females could use aggressiveness as a means of partner choice. Indeed, many studies suggest that sexual selection in addition to gaining a meal may be the adaptive value of sexual cannibalism (Prenter et al. 2006). From the female perspective, aggressive behavior directed toward males may serve as a general screening of partner quality, a mechanism often described as indirect mate choice (Elgar and Nash 1988; Prenter et al. 2006; Kralj-Fišer et al. 2012). A screening method implies that females attack every male, and suitors that cannot withstand and persist an attack will be killed and consumed; alternatively, females may differentiate between males and attack and consume only those males that do not meet certain quality criteria (reviewed in Prenter et al. 2006). The latter has been found in wolf spiders (Wilgers and Hebets 2012). The latter mechanism of direct choice is more complex than the indirect one as it requires perception and assessment of quality cues, and large enough benefits of choosiness are expected to match the costs. Mate rejection via sexual cannibalism is considered a particularly extreme case of sexual conflict mostly because rejection can lead to death. Although this may be true for the individual male that loses all future reproductive success, frequencies of preinsemination sexual cannibalism might be rather low (Kralj-Fišer et al. 2013b). Please note that in almost every species, a certain proportion of individuals will be excluded from the mating market and will have no mating success. The claim that prevention of mating success via sexual cannibalism results in more intense sexual conflict than exclusion from mating with less drastic measures has, to my knowledge, never been tested. Because of the scarcity of data on natural frequencies of preinsemination cannibalism, a meta-analysis would not reveal a realistic picture at this stage. Hence, to date, it is not feasible to compare the relative strength of selection imposed by a cannibalistic mate choice strategy against a strategy with less drastic consequences of mate rejection. More studies are needed to unravel the exact nature of sexual selection under the threat of ending as a meal. Below, I will briefly sketch possible responses to selection imposed by sexually cannibalistic females before or during insemination.  相似文献   

8.
Despite sharing much of their genomes, males and females are often highly dimorphic, reflecting at least in part the resolution of sexual conflict in response to sexually antagonistic selection. Sexual dimorphism arises owing to sex differences in gene expression, and steroid hormones are often invoked as a proximate cause of sexual dimorphism. Experimental elevation of androgens can modify behavior, physiology, and gene expression, but knowledge of the role of hormones remains incomplete, including how the sexes differ in gene expression in response to hormones. We addressed these questions in a bird species with a long history of behavioral endocrinological and ecological study, the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), using a custom microarray. Focusing on two brain regions involved in sexually dimorphic behavior and regulation of hormone secretion, we identified 651 genes that differed in expression by sex in medial amygdala and 611 in hypothalamus. Additionally, we treated individuals of each sex with testosterone implants and identified many genes that may be related to previously identified phenotypic effects of testosterone treatment. Some of these genes relate to previously identified effects of testosterone-treatment and suggest that the multiple effects of testosterone may be mediated by modifying the expression of a small number of genes. Notably, testosterone-treatment tended to alter expression of different genes in each sex: only 4 of the 527 genes identified as significant in one sex or the other were significantly differentially expressed in both sexes. Hormonally regulated gene expression is a key mechanism underlying sexual dimorphism, and our study identifies specific genes that may mediate some of these processes.  相似文献   

9.
The effectiveness of testosterone (T) and 11-ketotestosterone (K) in inducing male-typical sex behaviors in goldfish was examined by implanting intact adult females with one empty (blank) Silastic implant (B females), one implant containing T or K, or one T and one K implant (T + K females). Behavior of the four female groups was compared to that of untreated males and males containing a blank implant. Male-typical behaviors (coutship, spawning) and associated behavioral changes (increased activity, reduced spontaneous feeding) were assessed 3.5 and 4.5 months after implant in 30-min tests in which the test female or male was allowed to interact with a stimulus female in which sexual receptivity and attractivity had been induced by acute prostaglandin Finjection. Prostaglandin-induced female-typical spawning behavior in the test females and males was also assessed 4.5 months after implant in a 60-min test for female-typical behavior in which the test fish was injected with prostaglandin and placed immediately with a sexually active male. Blood samples 5 months postimplant showed that implants generated physiological levels of T and K. In both tests for male-typical behaviors, K and T + K females exhibited the full suite of behaviors shown by spawning males, e.g., male-typical courtship and spawning, increased swimming activity, and reduced spontaneous feeding. Although behaviors of K and T + K females did not differ, those of T + K females were more often equivalent to those of males and significantly different from those of B females. T females exhibited marginal male-typical behaviors which never differed significantly from those of B females. Androgen-treated females exhibited female-typical; spawning behaviors equivalent to that of males and B females. The results show that adult female goldfish can be behaviorally masculinzed without behavioral defeminization, and suggest that male-typical sex behaviors in goldfish are dependent on K, although other steroids also may be required. The inducible behavioral bisexuality of goldfish, a gonochoristic species, is discussed in terms of the prevalence of hermaphroditism in teleosts.  相似文献   

10.
Genital coevolution between the sexes is expected to be common because of the direct interaction between male and female genitalia during copulation. Here we review the diverse mechanisms of genital coevolution that include natural selection, female mate choice, male–male competition, and how their interactions generate sexual conflict that can lead to sexually antagonistic coevolution. Natural selection on genital morphology will result in size coevolution to allow for copulation to be mechanically possible, even as other features of genitalia may reflect the action of other mechanisms of selection. Genital coevolution is explicitly predicted by at least three mechanisms of genital evolution: lock and key to prevent hybridization, female choice, and sexual conflict. Although some good examples exist in support of each of these mechanisms, more data on quantitative female genital variation and studies of functional morphology during copulation are needed to understand more general patterns. A combination of different approaches is required to continue to advance our understanding of genital coevolution. Knowledge of the ecology and behavior of the studied species combined with functional morphology, quantitative morphological tools, experimental manipulation, and experimental evolution have been provided in the best-studied species, all of which are invertebrates. Therefore, attention to vertebrates in any of these areas is badly needed.Of all the evolutionary interactions between the sexes, the mechanical interaction of genitalia during copulation in species with internal fertilization is perhaps the most direct. For this reason alone, coevolution between genital morphologies of males and females is expected. Morphological and genetic components of male and female genitalia have been shown to covary in many taxa (Sota and Kubota 1998; Ilango and Lane 2000; Arnqvist and Rowe 2002; Brennan et al. 2007; Rönn et al. 2007; Kuntner et al. 2009; Tatarnic and Cassis 2010; Cayetano et al. 2011; Evans et al. 2011, 2013; Simmons and García-González 2011; Yassin and Orgogozo 2013; and see examples in
TaxaMale structuresFemale structuresEvidenceLikely mechanismReferences
Mollusks
 Land snails (Xerocrassa)Spermatophore-producing organsSpermatophore-receiving organsComparative among speciesSAC or female choiceSauder and Hausdorf 2009
 SatsumaPenis lengthVagina lengthCharacter displacementLock and keyKameda et al. 2009
Arthropods
 Arachnids (Nephilid spiders)MultipleMultipleComparative among speciesSACKuntner et al. 2009
 Pholcidae spidersCheliceral apophysisEpigynal pocketsComparative (no phylogenetic analysis)Female choiceHuber 1999
 Harvestmen (Opiliones)Hardened penes and loss of nuptial giftsSclerotized pregenital barriersComparative among speciesSACBurns et al. 2013
Millipedes
Parafontaria tonomineaGonopod sizeGenital segment sizeComparative in species complexMechanical incompatibility resulting from Intersexual selectionSota and Tanabe 2010
Antichiropus variabilisGonopod shape and sizeAccesory lobe of the vulva and distal projectionFunctional copulatory morphologyLock and keyWojcieszek and Simmons 2012
Crustacean
 Fiddler crabs, UcaGonopodeVulva, vagina, and spermathecaTwo-species comparison, shape correspondenceNatural selection against fluid loss, lock and key, and sexual selectionLautenschlager et al. 2010
Hexapodes
 OdonatesClasping appendagesAbdominal shape and sensory hairsFunctional morphology, comparative among speciesLock and key via female sensory systemRobertson and Paterson 1982; McPeek et al. 2009
Insects
 Coleoptera: seed beetlesSpiny aedagusThickened walls of copulatory ductComparative among speciesSACRönn et al. 2007
 Callosobruchus: Callosobruchus maculatusDamage inflictedSusceptibility to damageFull sib/half sib mating experimentsSACGay et al. 2011
Reduced spinesNo correlated responseExperimental evolutionSACCayetano et al. 2011
 Carabid beetles (Ohomopterus)Apophysis of the endophallusVaginal appendix (pocket attached to the vaginal apophysis)Cross-species matingsLock and keySota and Kubota 1998; Sasabi et al. 2010
 Dung beetle: Onthophagus taurusShape of the parameres in the aedagusSize and location of genital pitsExperimental evolutionFemale choiceSimmons and García-González 2011
 Diptera: Drosophila santomea and D. yakubaSclerotized spikes on the aedagusCavities with sclerotized plateletsCross-species matingsSACKamimura 2012
Drosophila melanogaster species complexEpandrial posterior lobes
Oviscapt pouchesComparative among speciesSAC or female choiceYassin and Orgogozo 2013
Phallic spikesOviscapt furrows
Cercal teeth, phallic hook, and spinesUterine, vulval, and vaginal shields
D. mauritiana and D. secheliaPosterior lobe of the genital archWounding of the female abdomenMating with introgressed linesSACMasly and Kamimura 2014
 Stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae)Genital processCommon spermathecal ductComparative among species and morphologicalFemale choiceKotrba et al. 2014
 Tse-tse flies: Glossina pallidipesCercal teethFemale-sensing structuresExperimental copulatory functionFemale choiceBriceño and Eberhard 2009a,b
 Phelebotomine: sand fliesAedagal filaments, aedagal sheathsSpermathecal ducts length, base of the ductComparative among speciesNone specifiedIlango and Lane 2000
 Heteroptera: Bed bugs (Cimiciidae)Piercing genitaliaSpermalege (thickened exosqueleton)Comparative among speciesSACCarayon 1966; Morrow and Arnqvist 2003
 Plant bugs (Coridromius)Changes in male genital shapeExternal female paragenitaliaComparative among speciesSACTatarnic and Cassis 2010
 Waterstriders (Gerris sp.)Grasping appendagesAntigrasping appendagesComparative among speciesSACArnqvist and Rowe 2002
Gerris incognitusGrasping appendagesAntigrasping appendagesComparative among populationsSACPerry and Rowe 2012
 Bee assassins (Apiomerus)AedagusBursa copulatrixComparative among speciesNoneForero et al. 2013
 Cave insects (Psocodea), NeotroglaMale genital chamberPenis-like gynosomeComparative among speciesFemale competition (role reversal), coevolution SACYoshizawa et al. 2014
 Butterflies (Heliconiinae)Thickness of spermatophore wallSigna: Sclerotized structure to break spermatophoresComparative among speciesSACSánchez and Cordero 2014
Fish
 Basking shark: Cetorhinus maximusClasper clawThick vaginal padsMorphological observationNoneMatthews 1950
GambusiaGonopodial tipsGenital papillae within openingsComparative among speciesStrong character displacementLangerhans 2011
Poecilia reticulataGonopodium tip shapeFemale gonopore shapeComparative among populationsSACEvans et al. 2011
Reptiles
 AnolesHemipene shapeVagina shapeShape correspondence, two speciesSexual selectionKöhler et al. 2012
 Several speciesHemipene shapeVagina shapeShape correspondenceLock and key, female choice, and SACPope 1941; Böhme and Ziegler 2009; King et al. 2009
 Asiatic pit vipersSpininess in hemipenesThickness of vagina wallTwo-species comparisonNonePope 1941
 Garter snake: Thamnophis sirtalisBasal hempene spineVaginal muscular controlExperimental manipulationSACFriesen et al. 2014
Birds
 WaterfowlPenis lengthVaginal elaborationComparative among speciesSACBrennan et al. 2007
 TinamousPenis length/presenceVaginal elaborationComparative among speciesFemale choice/natural selectionPLR Brennan, K Zyscowski, and RO Prum, unpubl.
Mammals
 MarsupialsBifid penisTwo lateral vaginaeShape correspondenceNoneRenfree 1987
 EquidnaBifid penis with four rosettesSingle vagina splits into two uteriShape correspondenceNoneAugee et al. 2006; Johnston et al. 2007
 Insectivores: Short-tailed shrew: Blarina brevicaudaS-shaped curve of the erect penisCoincident curve in the vaginaShape correspondenceNoneBedford et al. 2004
 Common tenrec: Tenrec caudatusFiliform penis (up to 70% of the male’s body length)Internal circular folds in the vaginaLength correspondenceNoneBedford et al. 2004
 Rodents: Cape dune mole: Bathyergus suillusPenis and baculum lengthVaginal lengthAllometric relationships within speciesNoneKinahan et al. 2007
 Australian hopping mice (Notomys)Spiny penisDerived distal region in the vaginaMorphological observation and two-species comparisonCopulatory lockBreed et al. 2013
 Pig: Sus domesticusFiliform penis endCervical ridgesArtificial inseminationFemale choiceBonet et al. 2013
 Primates: Macaca arctoidesLong and filamentous glansVestibular colliculus (fleshy fold) that partially obstructs the entrance to the vaginaShape correspondence and comparison with close relativesNoneFooden 1967
Open in a separate windowThe likely mechanism is that suggested by the authors, and it includes sexually antagonistic coevolution (SAC), natural selection, sexual selection, female choice, or none specified. The evidence provided by the studies can be comparative among species or among populations, experimental evolution, cross-species matings, full-sibling (sib)/half-sib matings, shape, and length correspondence. Shape correspondence is often taken as evidence of coevolution, although it is not as conclusive as other approaches.Male genitalia are among the most variable structures in nature (Eberhard 1985). In contrast, female genitalia have typically been found not to be as interspecifically variable as male genitalia in several studies that specifically examined and described them (Eberhard 1985, 2010a,b). Female genitalia are not studied as often as male genitalia, perhaps because of a male-biased view of evolutionary processes by researchers (Ah-King et al. 2014). However, studying female genitalia is undeniably challenging. Male genitalia are generally kept inside of the body cavity, but are everted before, or during copulation, so their functional morphology can be more easily studied than the internal genitalia of females. Female genitalia also tend to be softer than male genitalia and thus their morphology may be more difficult to describe, and can more easily be distorted on dissection and preservation. Female adaptations to sense or oppose features of male genitalia can be subtle, requiring careful study. Female genital tracts are under multiple sources of selection: not just mating, but also storing sperm, egg laying, birthing, and often interfacing with the terminal portion of the digestive tract. Therefore, selection balancing multiple functions may further constrain morphological evolution in female genitalia. However, even small morphological changes in female genitalia, for example, increases in vaginal muscle, may change a female’s ability to choose or reject a male during mating, or to manage the costs of mating. Thus, the functional consequences to male and female genital morphology are hard to predict unless one knows how genitalia function during intromission. Despite these challenges, recent studies have examined variation of female genitalia and evidence is accumulating that features of female genitalia are variable enough to support coevolutionary processes (Polihronakis 2006; Puniamoorthy et al. 2010; Siegel et al. 2011; Showalter et al. 2013; and see additional references in Ah-King et al. 2014).In this article, we will discuss different hypotheses of genital evolution that predict coevolution; however, this is not a review of that entire subject (but see Eberhard et al. 2010b; Simmons 2013). Rather, we discuss the various mechanisms of genital coevolution differentiating the potentially independent or overlapping roles of natural selection, female choice, and male–male competition (Fig. 1). This classification allows us to distinguish specifically those mechanisms of genital coevolution that involve sexual conflict (i.e., when the evolutionary interests of individuals of different sexes, particularly over mating, are different). We then highlight examples in different taxa organisms with particular emphasis on those that provide evidence of sexual conflict.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Graphical classification of mechanisms of genital evolution and coevolution. Three circles depict the independent and co-occurring actions of natural selection, female choice, and male–male competition. Different specific versions of genital coevolution can occur depending on which of the three broader evolutionary mechanisms are occurring. Sexual conflict (hatched lines) occurs through the simultaneous action of male–male competition and female choice, or male–male competition and natural selection. SAC, sexually antagonistic coevolution. See text for explanation.  相似文献   

11.
The Male and Female Nervous System or the Nervous System as a Secondary Sexual Character     
Carlos Libertun 《Cellular and molecular neurobiology》1997,17(6):563-564
  相似文献   

12.
Sexual Conflict over the Maintenance of Sex: Effects of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution for Reproductive Isolation of Parthenogenesis     
Kazutaka Kawatsu 《PloS one》2013,8(2)
Sexual reproduction involves many costs. Therefore, females acquiring a capacity for parthenogenetic (or asexual) reproduction will gain a reproductive advantage over obligately sexual females. In contrast, for males, any trait coercing parthenogens into sexual reproduction (male coercion) increases their fitness and should be under positive selection because parthenogenesis deprives them of their genetic contribution to future generations. Surprisingly, although such sexual conflict is a possible outcome whenever reproductive isolation is incomplete between parthenogens and the sexual ancestors, it has not been given much attention in the studies of the maintenance of sex. Using two mathematical models, I show here that the evolution of male coercion substantially favours the maintenance of sex even though a female barrier against the coercion can evolve. First, the model based on adaptive-dynamics theory demonstrates that the resultant antagonistic coevolution between male coercion and a female barrier fundamentally ends in either the prevalence of sex or the co-occurrence of two reproductive modes. This is because the coevolution between the two traits additionally involves sex-ratio selection, that is, an increase in parthenogenetic reproduction leads to a female-biased population sex ratio, which will enhance reproductive success of more coercive males and directly promotes the evolution of the coercion among males. Therefore, as shown by the individual-based model, the establishment of obligate parthenogenesis in the population requires the simultaneous evolution of strong reproductive isolation between males and parthenogens. These findings should shed light on the interspecific diversity of reproductive modes as well as help to explain the prevalence of sexual reproduction.  相似文献   

13.
Male Reproductive Senescence Causes Potential for Sexual Conflict over Mating     
Rebecca Dean  Charlie K. Cornwallis  Hanne Løvlie  Kirsty Worley  David S. Richardson  Tommaso Pizzari 《Current biology : CB》2010,20(13):1192-1196
  相似文献   

14.
Male Demography,Female Mating Behavior,and Infanticide in Wild Patas Monkeys (Erythrocebus patas)   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
Enstam  Karin L.  Isbell  Lynne A.  De Maar  Thomas W. 《International journal of primatology》2002,23(1):85-104
Infanticide by males has been hypothesized to be a naturally selected behavioral strategy that increases the infanticidal male's reproductive success. The sexual selection hypothesis has been challenged via alternative, nonadaptive hypotheses that dispute its empirical and theoretical bases. Two of the most widely recognized alternatives are the social pathology hypothesis, in which infanticide results from overcrowding or recent human disturbance, and the generalized aggression hypothesis, in which infanticide is an epiphenomenon of increased male aggression. We report the first case of infanticide in wild, seasonally breeding patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) living at a low population density in a stable habitat, conditions which do not support the social pathology hypothesis. Its exceptional occurrence is consistent with the sexual selection hypothesis: over a 7-year period the infanticidal male was the only one of 13 resident males that was not present during the actual conception season but was present during the following birth season. Also consistent with this hypothesis, mothers were differentially targeted for male aggression, which increased sevenfold during the days surrounding the infanticide and then decreased to baseline levels after the infanticide. Aggression targeted at mothers does not support the generalized aggression hypothesis. As predicted by the sexual selection hypothesis, females began soliciting mating immediately after the infanticide, despite its occurrence in the nonconceptive season.  相似文献   

15.
Male Sexual Signals and Female Choice in Drosophila grimshawi (Diptera: Drosophilidae)     
David C. Droney  M. Benjamin Hock 《Journal of Insect Behavior》1998,11(1):59-71
Sexual selection and sexual signaling have been prominent topics in recent behavioral studies, but limited data have led to controversy regarding these topics. For example, the Hawaiian Drosophila are often cited as examples in which female choice has resulted in the evolution of elaborate male courtship signals, but relatively few data exist to test these claims adequately. We studied D. grimshawi, a lek-forming Hawaiian Drosophila, to determine whether there was evidence for female choice without male competition and to elucidate the possible cues females use to discriminate. Male mating success was found to be nonrandom and males that courted females intensely and deposited many pheromone-containing streaks on the substrate were the most successful. Hence, multiple cues seem to be involved in male mating success in this species. Some males performed only one display, however, and may represent an alternate male mating tactic. The protein content of the adult male diet significantly influenced the level of pheromone streak deposition, and thus, foraging environment may affect the outcome of sexual selection.  相似文献   

16.
Reappraising Sexual Coevolution and the Sex Roles          下载免费PDF全文
Russell Bonduriansky 《PLoS biology》2009,7(12)
  相似文献   

17.
Sexual Selection in the Water Spider: Female Choice and Male–Male Competition     
Dolores Schütz  Michael Taborsky 《Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie》2011,117(12):1101-1110
The water spider Argyroneta aquatica is the only spider spending its whole life under water, and one of the few spider species in which males are larger than females. Previous studies indicated that males can cannibalize females, which is uncommon among spiders. Here we aimed to further test for a potential influence of sexual selection on male body size. We examined the importance of female choice by testing whether females prefer the larger of two simultaneously presented males as mating partners. Further, we examined the influence of male–male competition by comparing the fighting behaviour between large and small males when alone or when together with a female, and we determined the outcome of fights. We found that females approach and choose large males as mating partners, despite the risk of male cannibalism. Additionally, males intensively compete for females, and large males clearly win against smaller ones. Hence sexual selection seems to be important for the evolution of the peculiar sexual size dimorphism of water spiders, as large size is beneficial for males in both the intra‐ and intersexual context. Previous studies have suggested an important role of natural selection in the sex‐specific body size of water spiders, but natural and sexual selection mechanisms apparently work in the same direction, favouring large male size.  相似文献   

18.
RESEARCH PAPER: Multiple Sexual Ornamentation Signals Male Quality and Predicts Female Preference in Minnows     
Jukka Kekäläinen  Hannele Valkama  Hannu Huuskonen  Jouni Taskinen 《Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie》2010,116(10):895-903
Sexual ornamentation often consists of multiple components. Different sexual signals may indicate different aspects of mate quality or reflect quality in different time scales. On the other hand, same signals can have a dual function and are used both in male–male competition and courtship. Many fish species are capable of rapidly altering their colouration (ephemeral colour changes), but this capability is usually ignored in sexual selection studies. Here, we used experimentally manipulated social environments to study the ephemeral colour changes in multicomponent sexual signals of male minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus) during male–male competition and female choice. We found that the dominant males courted the females more actively and had redder and/or darker skin colouration than the subordinate males. Furthermore, darkness difference between subordinate and dominant males increased in the presence of female, which suggests that the male–male competition may increase the honesty of signalling and thus facilitate female choice. In support of this hypothesis, females had a strong behavioural preference towards the more colourful males, which may indicate female choice. As colourful males often had a higher social status than paler individuals, it is possible that females base their preference on male status, not only the colouration per se. In any case, our results suggest that sexual ornamentation of male minnows may signal status, courting activity and superior quality of the males and that these signals may have a dual function in both male–male competition and female choice. Females preferred different ornamental traits (dark and red colour patterns) relatively equally, indicating that mate choice is based on multiple cues.  相似文献   

19.
Male and Female          下载免费PDF全文
V. M. Cutter  Jr. 《The Yale journal of biology and medicine》1950,22(3):299
  相似文献   

20.
Speciation and Sexual Conflict     
Sergey?GavriletsEmail author  Takehiko?I.?Hayashi 《Evolutionary ecology》2005,19(2):167-198
We review mathematical models that explicitly consider the dynamics of evolutionary change driven by sexual conflict over mating rate when males are selected for increasing mating success whereas females are selected to restrict mating rate. These models focus on a pair of traits each of which is controlled by a separate set of genes expressed in one sex only. The traits control the probability of mating and/or fertilization. Overall, there are at least six different dynamic regimes observed in models of sexual conflict: (1) continuous coevolutionary chase between the sexes (which can result in allopatric speciation as a byproduct), (2) evolution towards an equilibrium, (3) cyclic evolution, (4) evolution towards a line of equilibria with subsequent random drift along this line, (5) Buridan’s Ass regime involving extensive diversification in female alleles without comparable diversification in male alleles, and (6) extensive diversification in both male and female alleles (which can result in sympatric speciation). Mathematical models also show that different dynamic regimes can be observed with the same set of parameter values but under different initial conditions. It is also possible that the same population switches from one regime to another as a result of stochastic perturbations due to, say, random genetic drift. Moreover, different sets of loci controlling mating and fertilization in the same species can follow different dynamic regimes. We attempt to make some generalizations and identify important directions for theoretical and empirical work.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号