共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
The theory of sexual conflict predicts that sexual coevolution will be very dynamic, with in principle perpetual evolutionary arms races and chases. These arms races are expected to stop once the costs of conflict adaptations become too high. We argue that this prediction is contingent on specific assumptions about the sexual interaction and the adaptations involved in the arms race. More generally, evolutionary arms races stop when the fitness benefit of further escalations is outweighed by the fitness costs. For this it is not necessary that the absolute costs of conflict must be high at the stable state, or that the population fitness must be decreased at equilibrium. We expect the outcome of sexual antagonistic coevolution to be determined by the possibility to reach compromises and by the relative ability of each sex to control the outcome of the interaction. We exemplify with a theoretical conflict model, which leads to population extinction when conflict is settled by armaments with expression-level determined costs. The model predicts a compromise with small conflict costs for the population, if costs are in addition determined by the extent of conflict between the sexes, which may be the case when the cost depends on behavioural antagonism. 相似文献
3.
Mewa Singh H. N. Kumara M. Ananda Kumar Mridula Singh Matthew Cooper 《International journal of primatology》2006,27(2):515-528
In bonnet macaques, males usually disperse between groups and females remain philopatric, but researchers have reported female
transfer. We report a rare case of male influx during the mating season in our bonnet macaque study group in the Anaimalai
Hills. The density of bonnet macaques in the study region was unusually high. The study group had a single, crippled adult
male with a long tenure and 5 adult females. During the mating season, adult females approached and mated with outgroup males,
and then several males entered the group. The adult male left the group without any resistance. The incoming males mated with
3 receptive females, forcibly mated with 2 lactating females, and attacked and killed 2 infants. During the influx, 2 outgroup
females joined the group. The data suggest that male influxes provide an opportunity for infanticide and female transfer,
which can have important fitness consequences even in species in which they rarely occur. 相似文献
4.
In contrast to male genitalia that typically exhibit patterns of rapid and divergent evolution among internally fertilizing animals, female genitalia have been less well studied and are generally thought to evolve slowly among closely-related species. As a result, few cases of male-female genital coevolution have been documented. In Drosophila, female copulatory structures have been claimed to be mostly invariant compared to male structures. Here, we re-examined male and female genitalia in the nine species of the D. melanogaster subgroup. We describe several new species-specific female genital structures that appear to coevolve with male genital structures, and provide evidence that the coevolving structures contact each other during copulation. Several female structures might be defensive shields against apparently harmful male structures, such as cercal teeth, phallic hooks and spines. Evidence for male-female morphological coevolution in Drosophila has previously been shown at the post-copulatory level (e.g., sperm length and sperm storage organ size), and our results provide support for male-female coevolution at the copulatory level. 相似文献
5.
María Sofía Dutto Lucia Calbacho‐Rosa Alfredo V. Peretti 《Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie》2011,117(11):1040-1049
The use of acoustic signals by males during courtship and mating is well known. Nevertheless, their association with female unwillingness to mate is much less studied. In spiders, stridulation during sexual interactions is relatively common in some groups, but mainly restricted to males. In the pholcid spider Holocnemus pluchei, both sexes have stridulatory organs. The aims of the present work were (1) to establish whether female stridulation occurs during intra‐ and inter‐sexual interactions, (2) to determine whether female reproductive status affects the likelihood that she will stridulate and (3) to determine whether female stridulation is influenced by male sexual behaviour. We found that female stridulation usually occurs both during intrasexual interactions and, most frequently, during intersexual interactions. Females with more previous matings stridulated more frequently. Stridulation intensity was higher in females that did not accept new copulations compared with those that copulated. Female stridulation did not vary in elaborated and non‐elaborated courtship. Thus, females use stridulation to communicate levels of sexual receptivity. It is also possible that females use stridulation to indirectly assess male ability to persist and persuade. 相似文献
6.
Existing models explaining the evolution of sexual dimorphism in the timing of emergence (SDT) in Lepidoptera assume equal mortality rates for males and females. The limiting assumption of equal mortality rates has the consequence that these models are only able to explain the evolution of emergence of males before females, i.e. protandry—the more common temporal sequence of emergence in Lepidoptera. The models fail, however, in providing adaptive explanations for the evolution of protogyny, where females emerge before males, but protogyny is not rare in insects. The assumption of equal mortality rates seems too restrictive for many insects, such as butterflies. To investigate the influence of unequal mortality rates on the evolution of SDT, we present a generalised version of a previously published model where we relax this assumption. We find that longer life-expectancy of females compared to males can indeed favour the evolution of protogyny as a fitness enhancing strategy. Moreover, the encounter rate between females and males and the sex-ratio are two important factors that also influence the evolution of optimal SDT. If considered independently for females and males the predicted strategies can be shown to be evolutionarily stable (ESS). Under the assumption of equal mortality rates the difference between the females’ and males’ ESS remains typically very small. However, female and male ESS may be quite dissimilar if mortality rates are different. This creates the potential for an ‘evolutionary conflict’ between females and males. Bagworm moths (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) provide an exemplary case where life-history attributes are such that protogyny should indeed be the optimal emergence strategy from the males’ and females’ perspectives: (i) Female longevity is considerably larger than that of males, (ii) encounter rates between females and males are presumably low, and (iii) females mate only once. Protogyny is indeed the general mating strategy found in the bagworm family. 相似文献
7.
Sexual cannibalism is a well-known example for sexual conflict and has many facets that determine the costs and benefits for the cannibal and the victim. Here, I focus on species in which sexual cannibalism is a general component of a mating system in which males invest maximally in mating with a single (monogyny) or two (bigyny) females. Sexual cannibalism can be a male strategy to maximize paternity and a female strategy to prevent paternity monopolization by any or a particular male. Considerable variation exists between species (1) in the potential of males to monopolize females, and (2) in the success of females in preventing monopolization by males. This opens up exciting future possibilities to investigate sexually antagonistic coevolution in a largely unstudied mating system.Sexual cannibalism, the killing and consumption of potential or actual mating partners in a mating context, has been termed a “pinnacle of sexual conflict” because of the dramatic ending of the act for one mating partner, mostly the male (Elgar and Schneider 2004). This contradiction of traditional sex roles may be one reason why the phenomenon of sexual cannibalism has intrigued naturalists for a long time. In the context of sexual conflict, sexually cannibalistic behavior of females is a harmful trait, and antagonistic traits are expected to evolve in males, which can be considered the reverse of most other examples in which females respond to male harm (see Perry and Rowe 2014). I will discuss potential antagonistic traits to sexual cannibalism in males but will also show that the above view is too simplistic when it comes to spider mating systems characterized by very low male mating rates.It is important to note that there are different kinds of sexual cannibalism based on very different evolutionary scenarios (Elgar and Schneider 2004; Prenter et al. 2006; Wilder et al. 2009). The most extreme divide exists between cannibalism before sperm transfer, which can only benefit the cannibal, and sexual cannibalism during or after sperm transfer (from here on termed postinsemination sexual cannibalism), which can benefit the cannibal and the victim (Elgar and Schneider 2004). Despite a longer history of research on preinsemination sexual cannibalism, the evolutionary causes and consequences of postinsemination sexual cannibalism are generally less debated.There are reports (often anecdotal) on the occurrence of sexual cannibalism from diverse invertebrate taxa (Elgar 1992) and it may well occur in all predatory invertebrates that are potentially cannibalistic (Polis 1981). It is beyond the scope of this brief review to list and evaluate all reported occurrences. Rather, I will start with a brief account of the generally discussed causes and consequences of sexual cannibalism and will then concentrate on the conflicting interests of the sexes regarding postinsemination sexual cannibalism in mating systems that are characterized by very low male mating rates.Studies that investigate sexual cannibalism experimentally are mostly concerned with (1) nutritional aspects, (2) the importance of sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection, and, increasingly, (3) behavioral syndromes. The aggressive spillover hypothesis suggests that preinsemination sexual cannibalism is part of a behavioral syndrome in which aggression against mating partners spills over from a foraging context (Arnqvist and Henriksson 1997). There is mixed support for this idea in the few species that have been looked at. In several spider species, females consistently differ in their aggressiveness and these differences affect sexual cannibalism (for a recent debate about the evidence for this hypothesis, see Johnson 2013; Kralj-Fišer et al. 2013b; Pruitt and Keiser 2013).A majority of studies have taken a unilateral view and have been concerned with the “motivation” of the cannibal; because sexual cannibalism generally occurs in predators, hunger is a well-supported motivation (Wilder et al. 2009). Many predators are food-limited, and, assuming a trade-off between foraging and mating, the balance may tilt toward foraging under particular circumstances (modeled by Newman and Elgar 1991). Food and mate availability will influence the costs and benefits of sexual cannibalism for females and have been one focus of a recent review on sexual cannibalism (Wilder et al. 2009).In all predatory and cannibalistic animals, mating partners impose selection on each other’s abilities to avoid or resist aggression. This selection pressure is asymmetrical if one sex is physically dominant. Indeed, the differences in size between females and males often determine the frequency of sexual cannibalism, perhaps because the potential to resist a cannibalistic attack is size-dependent (Elgar 1992; Wilder and Rypstra 2008). Usually, males are the victims and females are the cannibals. Yet, reversed sexual cannibalism has also been reported and appears to be associated with the reversed pattern in sexual size dimorphism. Examples are the water spider, Arygoneta aquatica (Schutz and Taborsky 2005, 2011) and role-reversed wolf spiders (Aisenberg et al. 2011). In the gnaphosid spider, Micaria sociabilis, large, young males cannibalize old and relatively smaller females (Sentenska and Pekar 2013). These examples further support the notion that the relative size differences of a mating pair play a part in determining the likelihood of sexual cannibalism. Patterns can be found both on a between-species comparative scale and on a within-species scale (Wilder and Rypstra 2008; Wilder et al. 2009), and they are also reported as an underlying pattern in cannibalism outside a mating context (Bleakley et al. 2013). Furthermore, there is anecdotal evidence for the same pattern in hermaphrodites (e.g., Goto and Yoshida 1985; Michiels et al. 2003), which may constitute a particularly interesting case to study, as the power asymmetries are less obviously related to the male or female role.In asymmetric encounters, the costs and risks of aggressive behavior toward potential mating partners are low for the dominant partner. Toward smaller males, females could use aggressiveness as a means of partner choice. Indeed, many studies suggest that sexual selection in addition to gaining a meal may be the adaptive value of sexual cannibalism (Prenter et al. 2006). From the female perspective, aggressive behavior directed toward males may serve as a general screening of partner quality, a mechanism often described as indirect mate choice (Elgar and Nash 1988; Prenter et al. 2006; Kralj-Fišer et al. 2012). A screening method implies that females attack every male, and suitors that cannot withstand and persist an attack will be killed and consumed; alternatively, females may differentiate between males and attack and consume only those males that do not meet certain quality criteria (reviewed in Prenter et al. 2006). The latter has been found in wolf spiders (Wilgers and Hebets 2012). The latter mechanism of direct choice is more complex than the indirect one as it requires perception and assessment of quality cues, and large enough benefits of choosiness are expected to match the costs. Mate rejection via sexual cannibalism is considered a particularly extreme case of sexual conflict mostly because rejection can lead to death. Although this may be true for the individual male that loses all future reproductive success, frequencies of preinsemination sexual cannibalism might be rather low (Kralj-Fišer et al. 2013b). Please note that in almost every species, a certain proportion of individuals will be excluded from the mating market and will have no mating success. The claim that prevention of mating success via sexual cannibalism results in more intense sexual conflict than exclusion from mating with less drastic measures has, to my knowledge, never been tested. Because of the scarcity of data on natural frequencies of preinsemination cannibalism, a meta-analysis would not reveal a realistic picture at this stage. Hence, to date, it is not feasible to compare the relative strength of selection imposed by a cannibalistic mate choice strategy against a strategy with less drastic consequences of mate rejection. More studies are needed to unravel the exact nature of sexual selection under the threat of ending as a meal. Below, I will briefly sketch possible responses to selection imposed by sexually cannibalistic females before or during insemination. 相似文献
8.
Mark P. Peterson Kimberly A. Rosvall Jeong-Hyeon Choi Charles Ziegenfus Haixu Tang John K. Colbourne Ellen D. Ketterson 《PloS one》2013,8(4)
Despite sharing much of their genomes, males and females are often highly dimorphic, reflecting at least in part the resolution of sexual conflict in response to sexually antagonistic selection. Sexual dimorphism arises owing to sex differences in gene expression, and steroid hormones are often invoked as a proximate cause of sexual dimorphism. Experimental elevation of androgens can modify behavior, physiology, and gene expression, but knowledge of the role of hormones remains incomplete, including how the sexes differ in gene expression in response to hormones. We addressed these questions in a bird species with a long history of behavioral endocrinological and ecological study, the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis), using a custom microarray. Focusing on two brain regions involved in sexually dimorphic behavior and regulation of hormone secretion, we identified 651 genes that differed in expression by sex in medial amygdala and 611 in hypothalamus. Additionally, we treated individuals of each sex with testosterone implants and identified many genes that may be related to previously identified phenotypic effects of testosterone treatment. Some of these genes relate to previously identified effects of testosterone-treatment and suggest that the multiple effects of testosterone may be mediated by modifying the expression of a small number of genes. Notably, testosterone-treatment tended to alter expression of different genes in each sex: only 4 of the 527 genes identified as significant in one sex or the other were significantly differentially expressed in both sexes. Hormonally regulated gene expression is a key mechanism underlying sexual dimorphism, and our study identifies specific genes that may mediate some of these processes. 相似文献
9.
The effectiveness of testosterone (T) and 11-ketotestosterone (K) in inducing male-typical sex behaviors in goldfish was examined by implanting intact adult females with one empty (blank) Silastic implant (B females), one implant containing T or K, or one T and one K implant (T + K females). Behavior of the four female groups was compared to that of untreated males and males containing a blank implant. Male-typical behaviors (coutship, spawning) and associated behavioral changes (increased activity, reduced spontaneous feeding) were assessed 3.5 and 4.5 months after implant in 30-min tests in which the test female or male was allowed to interact with a stimulus female in which sexual receptivity and attractivity had been induced by acute prostaglandin F2αinjection. Prostaglandin-induced female-typical spawning behavior in the test females and males was also assessed 4.5 months after implant in a 60-min test for female-typical behavior in which the test fish was injected with prostaglandin and placed immediately with a sexually active male. Blood samples 5 months postimplant showed that implants generated physiological levels of T and K. In both tests for male-typical behaviors, K and T + K females exhibited the full suite of behaviors shown by spawning males, e.g., male-typical courtship and spawning, increased swimming activity, and reduced spontaneous feeding. Although behaviors of K and T + K females did not differ, those of T + K females were more often equivalent to those of males and significantly different from those of B females. T females exhibited marginal male-typical behaviors which never differed significantly from those of B females. Androgen-treated females exhibited female-typical; spawning behaviors equivalent to that of males and B females. The results show that adult female goldfish can be behaviorally masculinzed without behavioral defeminization, and suggest that male-typical sex behaviors in goldfish are dependent on K, although other steroids also may be required. The inducible behavioral bisexuality of goldfish, a gonochoristic species, is discussed in terms of the prevalence of hermaphroditism in teleosts. 相似文献
10.
Genital coevolution between the sexes is expected to be common because of the direct interaction between male and female genitalia during copulation. Here we review the diverse mechanisms of genital coevolution that include natural selection, female mate choice, male–male competition, and how their interactions generate sexual conflict that can lead to sexually antagonistic coevolution. Natural selection on genital morphology will result in size coevolution to allow for copulation to be mechanically possible, even as other features of genitalia may reflect the action of other mechanisms of selection. Genital coevolution is explicitly predicted by at least three mechanisms of genital evolution: lock and key to prevent hybridization, female choice, and sexual conflict. Although some good examples exist in support of each of these mechanisms, more data on quantitative female genital variation and studies of functional morphology during copulation are needed to understand more general patterns. A combination of different approaches is required to continue to advance our understanding of genital coevolution. Knowledge of the ecology and behavior of the studied species combined with functional morphology, quantitative morphological tools, experimental manipulation, and experimental evolution have been provided in the best-studied species, all of which are invertebrates. Therefore, attention to vertebrates in any of these areas is badly needed.Of all the evolutionary interactions between the sexes, the mechanical interaction of genitalia during copulation in species with internal fertilization is perhaps the most direct. For this reason alone, coevolution between genital morphologies of males and females is expected. Morphological and genetic components of male and female genitalia have been shown to covary in many taxa (Sota and Kubota 1998; Ilango and Lane 2000; Arnqvist and Rowe 2002; Brennan et al. 2007; Rönn et al. 2007; Kuntner et al. 2009; Tatarnic and Cassis 2010; Cayetano et al. 2011; Evans et al. 2011, 2013; Simmons and García-González 2011; Yassin and Orgogozo 2013; and see examples in Taxa Male structures Female structures Evidence Likely mechanism References Mollusks Land snails (Xerocrassa) Spermatophore-producing organs Spermatophore-receiving organs Comparative among species SAC or female choice Sauder and Hausdorf 2009 Satsuma Penis length Vagina length Character displacement Lock and key Kameda et al. 2009 Arthropods Arachnids (Nephilid spiders) Multiple Multiple Comparative among species SAC Kuntner et al. 2009 Pholcidae spiders Cheliceral apophysis Epigynal pockets Comparative (no phylogenetic analysis) Female choice Huber 1999 Harvestmen (Opiliones) Hardened penes and loss of nuptial gifts Sclerotized pregenital barriers Comparative among species SAC Burns et al. 2013 Millipedes Parafontaria tonominea Gonopod size Genital segment size Comparative in species complex Mechanical incompatibility resulting from Intersexual selection Sota and Tanabe 2010 Antichiropus variabilis Gonopod shape and size Accesory lobe of the vulva and distal projection Functional copulatory morphology Lock and key Wojcieszek and Simmons 2012 Crustacean Fiddler crabs, Uca Gonopode Vulva, vagina, and spermatheca Two-species comparison, shape correspondence Natural selection against fluid loss, lock and key, and sexual selection Lautenschlager et al. 2010 Hexapodes Odonates Clasping appendages Abdominal shape and sensory hairs Functional morphology, comparative among species Lock and key via female sensory system Robertson and Paterson 1982; McPeek et al. 2009 Insects Coleoptera: seed beetles Spiny aedagus Thickened walls of copulatory duct Comparative among species SAC Rönn et al. 2007 Callosobruchus: Callosobruchus maculatus Damage inflicted Susceptibility to damage Full sib/half sib mating experiments SAC Gay et al. 2011 Reduced spines No correlated response Experimental evolution SAC Cayetano et al. 2011 Carabid beetles (Ohomopterus) Apophysis of the endophallus Vaginal appendix (pocket attached to the vaginal apophysis) Cross-species matings Lock and key Sota and Kubota 1998; Sasabi et al. 2010 Dung beetle: Onthophagus taurus Shape of the parameres in the aedagus Size and location of genital pits Experimental evolution Female choice Simmons and García-González 2011 Diptera: Drosophila santomea and D. yakuba Sclerotized spikes on the aedagus Cavities with sclerotized platelets Cross-species matings SAC Kamimura 2012 Drosophila melanogaster species complex Epandrial posterior lobes
Oviscapt pouches Comparative among species SAC or female choice Yassin and Orgogozo 2013 Phallic spikes Oviscapt furrows Cercal teeth, phallic hook, and spines Uterine, vulval, and vaginal shields D. mauritiana and D. sechelia Posterior lobe of the genital arch Wounding of the female abdomen Mating with introgressed lines SAC Masly and Kamimura 2014 Stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae) Genital process Common spermathecal duct Comparative among species and morphological Female choice Kotrba et al. 2014 Tse-tse flies: Glossina pallidipes Cercal teeth Female-sensing structures Experimental copulatory function Female choice Briceño and Eberhard 2009a,b Phelebotomine: sand flies Aedagal filaments, aedagal sheaths Spermathecal ducts length, base of the duct Comparative among species None specified Ilango and Lane 2000 Heteroptera: Bed bugs (Cimiciidae) Piercing genitalia Spermalege (thickened exosqueleton) Comparative among species SAC Carayon 1966; Morrow and Arnqvist 2003 Plant bugs (Coridromius) Changes in male genital shape External female paragenitalia Comparative among species SAC Tatarnic and Cassis 2010 Waterstriders (Gerris sp.) Grasping appendages Antigrasping appendages Comparative among species SAC Arnqvist and Rowe 2002 Gerris incognitus Grasping appendages Antigrasping appendages Comparative among populations SAC Perry and Rowe 2012 Bee assassins (Apiomerus) Aedagus Bursa copulatrix Comparative among species None Forero et al. 2013 Cave insects (Psocodea), Neotrogla Male genital chamber Penis-like gynosome Comparative among species Female competition (role reversal), coevolution SAC Yoshizawa et al. 2014 Butterflies (Heliconiinae) Thickness of spermatophore wall Signa: Sclerotized structure to break spermatophores Comparative among species SAC Sánchez and Cordero 2014 Fish Basking shark: Cetorhinus maximus Clasper claw Thick vaginal pads Morphological observation None Matthews 1950 Gambusia Gonopodial tips Genital papillae within openings Comparative among species Strong character displacement Langerhans 2011 Poecilia reticulata Gonopodium tip shape Female gonopore shape Comparative among populations SAC Evans et al. 2011 Reptiles Anoles Hemipene shape Vagina shape Shape correspondence, two species Sexual selection Köhler et al. 2012 Several species Hemipene shape Vagina shape Shape correspondence Lock and key, female choice, and SAC Pope 1941; Böhme and Ziegler 2009; King et al. 2009 Asiatic pit vipers Spininess in hemipenes Thickness of vagina wall Two-species comparison None Pope 1941 Garter snake: Thamnophis sirtalis Basal hempene spine Vaginal muscular control Experimental manipulation SAC Friesen et al. 2014 Birds Waterfowl Penis length Vaginal elaboration Comparative among species SAC Brennan et al. 2007 Tinamous Penis length/presence Vaginal elaboration Comparative among species Female choice/natural selection PLR Brennan, K Zyscowski, and RO Prum, unpubl. Mammals Marsupials Bifid penis Two lateral vaginae Shape correspondence None Renfree 1987 Equidna Bifid penis with four rosettes Single vagina splits into two uteri Shape correspondence None Augee et al. 2006; Johnston et al. 2007 Insectivores: Short-tailed shrew: Blarina brevicauda S-shaped curve of the erect penis Coincident curve in the vagina Shape correspondence None Bedford et al. 2004 Common tenrec: Tenrec caudatus Filiform penis (up to 70% of the male’s body length) Internal circular folds in the vagina Length correspondence None Bedford et al. 2004 Rodents: Cape dune mole: Bathyergus suillus Penis and baculum length Vaginal length Allometric relationships within species None Kinahan et al. 2007 Australian hopping mice (Notomys) Spiny penis Derived distal region in the vagina Morphological observation and two-species comparison Copulatory lock Breed et al. 2013 Pig: Sus domesticus Filiform penis end Cervical ridges Artificial insemination Female choice Bonet et al. 2013 Primates: Macaca arctoides Long and filamentous glans Vestibular colliculus (fleshy fold) that partially obstructs the entrance to the vagina Shape correspondence and comparison with close relatives None Fooden 1967