Translocation and Stability of Replicative DNA Helicases upon Encountering DNA-Protein Cross-links

DNA-protein cross-links (DPCs) are formed when cells are exposed to various DNA-damaging agents. Because DPCs are extremely large, steric hindrance conferred by DPCs is likely to affect many aspects of DNA transactions. In DNA replication, DPCs are first encountered by the replicative helicase that moves at the head of the replisome. However, little is known about how replicative helicases respond to covalently immobilized protein roadblocks. In the present study we elucidated the effect of DPCs on the DNA unwinding reaction of hexameric replicative helicases in vitro using defined DPC substrates. DPCs on the translocating strand but not on the nontranslocating strand impeded the progression of the helicases including the phage T7 gene 4 protein, simian virus 40 large T antigen, Escherichia coli DnaB protein, and human minichromosome maintenance Mcm467 subcomplex. The impediment varied with the size of the cross-linked proteins, with a threshold size for clearance of 5.0–14.1 kDa. These results indicate that the central channel of the dynamically translocating hexameric ring helicases can accommodate only small proteins and that all of the helicases tested use the steric exclusion mechanism to unwind duplex DNA. These results further suggest that DPCs on the translocating and nontranslocating strands constitute helicase and polymerase blocks, respectively. The helicases stalled by DPC had limited stability and dissociated from DNA with a half-life of 15–36 min. The implications of the results are discussed in relation to the distinct stabilities of replisomes that encounter tight but reversible DNA-protein complexes and irreversible DPC roadblocks.     

Human RECQ1 and RECQ4 Helicases Play Distinct Roles in DNA Replication Initiation

Cellular and biochemical studies support a role for all five human RecQ helicases in DNA replication; however, their specific functions during this process are unclear. Here we investigate the in vivo association of the five human RecQ helicases with three well-characterized human replication origins. We show that only RECQ1 (also called RECQL or RECQL1) and RECQ4 (also called RECQL4) associate with replication origins in a cell cycle-regulated fashion in unperturbed cells. RECQ4 is recruited to origins at late G₁, after ORC and MCM complex assembly, while RECQ1 and additional RECQ4 are loaded at origins at the onset of S phase, when licensed origins begin firing. Both proteins are lost from origins after DNA replication initiation, indicating either disassembly or tracking with the newly formed replisome. Nascent-origin DNA synthesis and the frequency of origin firing are reduced after RECQ1 depletion and, to a greater extent, after RECQ4 depletion. Depletion of RECQ1, though not that of RECQ4, also suppresses replication fork rates in otherwise unperturbed cells. These results indicate that RECQ1 and RECQ4 are integral components of the human replication complex and play distinct roles in DNA replication initiation and replication fork progression in vivo.The RecQ helicases are a family of DNA-unwinding enzymes essential for the maintenance of genome integrity in all kingdoms of life. Five RecQ enzymes have been found in human cells: RECQ1 (also called RECQL or RECQL1), BLM (RECQ2 or RECQL3), WRN (RECQ3 or RECQL2), RECQ4 (RECQL4), and RECQ5 (RECQL5) (3, 7). Here we refer to these helicases as RECQ1, RECQ4, and RECQ5, without the “L” that is present in the official gene names. Mutations in the BLM, WRN, and RECQ4 genes are linked to Bloom syndrome (BS), Werner syndrome (WS), and the subset of Rothmund-Thomson syndrome (RTS) patients at high risk of developing osteosarcomas, respectively (19, 31, 71). RECQ4 mutations have also been associated with RAPADILINO and Baller-Gerold syndrome (56, 61). Although these disorders are all associated with inherent genomic instability and cancer predisposition, they show distinct clinical features, suggesting that BLM, WRN, and RECQ4 are involved in different aspects of DNA metabolism. However, the molecular events underlying the pathogenesis of BS, WS, and RTS remain obscure. Mutations in the remaining two human RecQ helicase genes, RECQ1 and RECQ5, have not as yet been identified as causes of either genomic instability or heritable cancer predisposition disorders.Several lines of evidence suggest that RecQ helicases play an important role in DNA replication control (3, 10). In particular, RecQ helicases are thought to facilitate replication by preserving the integrity of stalled replication forks and by remodeling or repairing damaged or collapsed forks to allow the resumption of replication. Consistent with these ideas, several investigators have shown that primary fibroblasts from BS, WS, and RTS patients and RecQ5-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts all show differential hypersensitivity to agents that perturb DNA replication (12, 14, 26, 29). Moreover, BLM and WRN are recruited to DNA replication forks after replicative stress, and DNA fiber track analyses have shown that both BLM and WRN are required for normal fork progression after DNA damage or replication arrest (11-13, 47, 54). In particular, BLM in conjunction with DNA topoisomerase III and two other accessory proteins, RMI-1 and RMI-2, has been shown to catalyze the resolution of double-Holliday-junction recombination intermediates to generate noncrossover products. This dissolution reaction could play an important role in the error-free recombinational repair of damaged or stalled forks during S phase (57, 67). WRN also appears to promote error-free repair by contributing to the resolution of gene conversion events to generate noncrossover products (46). In line with the above observations, WRN and BLM can be found associated with replication foci or other DNA damage response proteins in damaged cells. In contrast, in unperturbed cells, a majority of each protein is found in the nucleolus (WRN) or associated with PML bodies (BLM) (5, 37, 62).RECQ4 has also been implicated in DNA replication. Recent studies have shown that hypomorphic mutants of the Drosophila melanogaster homolog of human RECQ4, DmRECQ4, have reduced DNA replication-dependent chorion gene amplification (65). These findings are thus consistent with a postulated role for Xenopus laevis RECQ4 (XRECQ4) in the initiation of DNA replication (39, 48). The N terminus of XRECQ4 bears homology to the N termini of the yeast proteins Sld2 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae [budding yeast]) and DRC1 (Schizosaccharomyces pombe [fission yeast]), which play a central role, in association with budding yeast Dpb11 and the fission yeast homolog Cut5/Rad4, in the establishment of DNA replication forks (38, 41, 63). Consistently, the N terminus of XRECQ4 has been shown to interact with the X. laevis variant of Cut5, and XRECQ4 depletion severely perturbs DNA replication initiation in X. laevis egg extracts (39, 48). The notion that the function of XRECQ4 is evolutionarily conserved in mammals is supported by the observations that the human protein can complement its Xenopus counterpart in cell-free assays for replication initiation and that depletion of human RECQ4 inhibits cellular proliferation and DNA synthesis (39, 48). Moreover, deletion of the N-terminal region of mouse RECQ4 has been shown to be an embryonic lethal mutation (27). These observations suggest that vertebrate RECQ4 might be a functional homolog of Sld2/DRC11, although its precise function during replication initiation and progression is not known. Recent results, published while this work was in progress, indicate that human RECQ4 interacts with the MCM replicative complex during replication initiation and that this interaction is regulated by CDK phosphorylation of RECQ4 (69). These findings, together with our results below, provide clues to the mechanism regulating RECQ4 interaction with the replication machinery.RECQ1 is the most abundant of the human RecQ helicases and was the first of the human RecQ proteins to be discovered on the basis of its potent ATPase activity (50). Despite this, little is known about the cellular functions of RECQ1, and no human disease associations have been identified to date. Recent studies have shown that RECQ1 is involved in the maintenance of genome integrity and that RECQ1 depletion affects cellular proliferation (51). Moreover, biochemical studies have shown that RECQ1 and BLM display distinct substrate specificities, indicating that these helicases are likely to perform nonoverlapping functions (43). These results suggest an important—though as yet mechanistically ill-defined—role for RECQ1 in cell cycle progression and/or DNA repair (52).In order to better delineate the role of human RecQ helicases in DNA replication, we investigated the in vivo interactions of all five human RecQ enzymes with three well-characterized human DNA replication origins in quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays. We also determined how nascent-origin-dependent DNA synthesis, chromatin binding of replication proteins, origin firing frequency, and replication fork rates were altered by depleting specific human RecQ helicase proteins. We found that only two of the five human RecQ helicases, RECQ1 and RECQ4, specifically interact with origins in unperturbed cells. Our results provide new mechanistic insight into the distinct roles of human RECQ1 and RECQ4 in DNA replication initiation and in replication fork progression.     

Structure and Function of RecQ DNA Helicases

RecQ family helicases play important roles in coordinating genome maintenance pathways in living cells. In the absence of functional RecQ proteins, cells exhibit a variety of phenotypes, including increased mitotic recombination, elevated chromosome missegregation, hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, and defects in meiosis. Mutations in three of the five human RecQ family members give rise to genetic disorders associated with a predisposition to cancer and premature aging, highlighting the importance of RecQ proteins and their cellular activities for human health. Current evidence suggests that RecQ proteins act at multiple steps in DNA replication, including stabilization of replication forks and removal of DNA recombination intermediates, in order to maintain genome integrity. The cellular basis of RecQ helicase function may be explained through interactions with multiple components of the DNA replication and recombination machinery. This review focuses on biochemical and structural aspects of the RecQ helicases and how these features relate to their known cellular function, specifically in preventing excessive recombination.     

Studies on the Mechanism of Replication of Adenovirus DNA II. The Nature of Single-Stranded DNA in Replicative Intermediates

Replicative intermediates of adenovirus type 5 DNA contain large stretches of single-stranded DNA. We have shown that this single-stranded DNA is mainly of parental origin, whereas all new DNA synthesized during one round of replication has a double-stranded structure. Hybridization experiments of the single-stranded DNA with isolated complementary strands of adenovirus type 5 DNA showed that this DNA hybridized only with the viral L-strand (the strand with the lower equilibrium density in alkaline CsCl) indicating that it represents the viral H-strand. This observation implies that replication always starts from one and the same molecular end. Electron microscopy of partially denatured Y-shaped intermediates confirmed this and showed that replication started from the molecular right end (the end richest in A-T base pairs). In conclusion, we have shown that replication of adenovirus type 5 DNA starts at the molecular right end, displacing the parental H-strand.     

Replicative DNA Polymerases

In 1959, Arthur Kornberg was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on the principles by which DNA is duplicated by DNA polymerases. Since then, it has been confirmed in all branches of life that replicative DNA polymerases require a single-stranded template to build a complementary strand, but they cannot start a new DNA strand de novo. Thus, they also depend on a primase, which generally assembles a short RNA primer to provide a 3′-OH that can be extended by the replicative DNA polymerase. The general principles that (1) a helicase unwinds the double-stranded DNA, (2) single-stranded DNA-binding proteins stabilize the single-stranded DNA, (3) a primase builds a short RNA primer, and (4) a clamp loader loads a clamp to (5) facilitate the loading and processivity of the replicative polymerase, are well conserved among all species. Replication of the genome is remarkably robust and is performed with high fidelity even in extreme environments. Work over the last decade or so has confirmed (6) that a common two-metal ion-promoted mechanism exists for the nucleotidyltransferase reaction that builds DNA strands, and (7) that the replicative DNA polymerases always act as a key component of larger multiprotein assemblies, termed replisomes. Furthermore (8), the integrity of replisomes is maintained by multiple protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions, many of which are inherently weak. This enables large conformational changes to occur without dissociation of replisome components, and also means that in general replisomes cannot be isolated intact.The genomes, from the smallest to the largest, provide an enormous challenge for the replicative DNA polymerases to faithfully copy to give the many generations that follow a comparable condition for life. In this article, we discuss the structural and functional bases by which replicative DNA polymerases are able to efficiently and faithfully build new copies of genomes in eubacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes.     

Replicative DNA polymerases

SUMMARY: Replicative DNA polymerases are essential for the replication of the genomes of all living organisms. On the basis of sequence similarities they can be classified into three types. Type A polymerases are homologous to bacterial polymerases I, Type B comprises archaebacterial DNA polymerases and eukaryotic DNA polymerase alpha, and the bacterial polymerase III class make up type C. Structures have been solved for several type A and B polymerases, which share a similar architecture. The structure of type C is not yet known. The catalytic mechanism of all three types involves two metal-ion-binding acidic residues in the active site. Replicative polymerases are constitutively expressed, but their activity is regulated through the cell cycle and in response to different growth conditions.     

Replication Process of the Parvovirus H-1 II. Isolation and Characterization of H-1 Replicative Form DNA

The Parvovirus H-1 replicates autonomously in hamster embryo cells. A DNA synthetic event, called HA-DNA synthesis, upon which subsequent viral RNA and viral hemagglutinin synthesis is dependent, is initiated in late S phase of the infected cell (18). It was postulated that HA-DNA represents parental viral replicative form DNA (RF DNA). This study describes the isolation and characterization of H-1 RF DNA as part of the continuing study of the mechanisms and control of DNA replication in the eukaryotic cell. The H-1 RF DNA is a linear duplex molecule containing the viral strand and its complement. The complementary strands of the RF DNA have been separated by equilibrium density gradient centrifugation. The RF DNA has a buoyant density of 1.705 in neutral CsCl and an estimated guanine plus cytosine (GC) content of 45.9%. It has a sedimentation coefficient of 17S. The calculated molecular weight of 3.7 x 10(6) is twice that of the single-stranded virion DNA. H-1 virions contain DNA that is homogeneous and free of complementary strands.     

Mechanism of Replicative DNA Polymerase Delta Pausing and a Potential Role for DNA Polymerase Kappa in Common Fragile Site Replication

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are hot spots of chromosomal breakage, and CFS breakage models involve perturbations of DNA replication. Here, we analyzed the contribution of specific repetitive DNA sequence elements within CFSs to the inhibition of DNA synthesis by replicative and specialized DNA polymerases (Pols). The efficiency of in vitro DNA synthesis was quantitated using templates corresponding to regions within FRA16D and FRA3B harboring AT-rich microsatellite and quasi-palindrome (QP) sequences. QPs were predicted to form stems of ~ 75–100% self-homology, separated by 3–9 bases of intervening sequences. Analysis of DNA synthesis progression by human Pol δ demonstrated significant synthesis perturbation both at [A]_n and [TA]_n repeats in a length-dependent manner and at short (< 40 base pairs) QP sequences. DNA synthesis by the Y-family polymerase κ was significantly more efficient than Pol δ through both types of repetitive elements. Using DNA trap experiments, we show that Pol δ pauses within CFS sequences are sites of enzyme dissociation, and dissociation was observed in the presence of RFC-loaded PCNA. We propose that enrichment of microsatellite and QP elements at CFS regions contributes to fragility by perturbing replication through multiple mechanisms, including replicative Pol pausing and dissociation. Our finding that Pol δ dissociates at specific CFS sequences is significant, since dissociation of the replication machinery and inability to efficiently recover the replication fork can lead to fork collapse and/or formation of double-strand breaks in vivo. Our biochemical studies also extend the potential involvement of Y-family polymerases in CFS maintenance to include polymerase κ.     

Replication of Bacteriophage Ribonucleic Acid: Analysis of the Ultrastructure of the Replicative Form and the Replicative Intermediate of Bacteriophage R17

A detailed qualitative and quantitative comparison was made of the ultrastructure of single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) from bacteriophage R17 and double-stranded replicative form (RF) and replicative intermediate (RI) from cells infected with this bacteriophage. The nucleic acids were prepared for electron microscopy by the protein monolayer spreading technique of Kleinschmidt. Single-stranded RNA aggregated during spreading in the absence of urea, whereas RF and RI did not. On the other hand, RF and RI appeared to be susceptible to shear during spreading, whereas R17 RNA was not. From the maximal length of RF, a base translation of 3.14 A was calculated. This value favors a 10-fold helix model of double-stranded RNA. The same base translation was found for R17 RNA, indicating a stacked base structure for single-stranded RNA spread in the presence of urea. RI is a branched structure and the branches are removed by ribonuclease treatment. The branches are believed to be nascent single-stranded viral RNA. The contour length of the branch was equal to the contour length of the main chain up to the branch point, as predicted from theoretical analysis of the replication of viral RNA. The structure of RF and the main chain of RI was also analyzed by plotting the log (end-to-end distance squared) versus log (contour length). This demonstrated structures intermediate in stiffness between a random coil and a rigid rod.     

Structure-Specific Abnormalities Associated with Mutations in a DNA Replication Accessory Factor in Drosophila

We have phenotypically and molecularly analyzed the cutlet locus in Drosophila. Homozygous cutlet flies exhibit abnormal development of a subset of adult tissues, including the eye, wing, and ovary. We show that abnormal development of these tissues is due to a defect in normal cell growth. Surprisingly, cell growth is affected in all developing precursor tissues in cutlet mutant animals, including those that give rise to phenotypically wild-type adult structures. The cutlet gene encodes a Drosophila homologue of yeast CHL12 and has similarity to mammalian replication factor C. In addition, cutlet genetically interacts with multiple subunits of Drosophila replication factor C. Our results suggest that the cutlet gene product acts as an accessory factor for DNA replication and has different requirements for the formation of various adult structures during Drosophila development.     

The Expanding Functions of Cellular Helicases: The Tombusvirus RNA Replication Enhancer Co-opts the Plant eIF4AIII-Like AtRH2 and the DDX5-Like AtRH5 DEAD-Box RNA Helicases to Promote Viral Asymmetric RNA Replication

Replication of plus-strand RNA viruses depends on recruited host factors that aid several critical steps during replication. Several of the co-opted host factors bind to the viral RNA, which plays multiple roles, including mRNA function, as an assembly platform for the viral replicase (VRC), template for RNA synthesis, and encapsidation during infection. It is likely that remodeling of the viral RNAs and RNA-protein complexes during the switch from one step to another requires RNA helicases. In this paper, we have discovered a second group of cellular RNA helicases, including the eIF4AIII-like yeast Fal1p and the DDX5-like Dbp3p and the orthologous plant AtRH2 and AtRH5 DEAD box helicases, which are co-opted by tombusviruses. Unlike the previously characterized DDX3-like AtRH20/Ded1p helicases that bind to the 3′ terminal promoter region in the viral minus-strand (−)RNA, the other class of eIF4AIII-like RNA helicases bind to a different cis-acting element, namely the 5′ proximal RIII(−) replication enhancer (REN) element in the TBSV (−)RNA. We show that the binding of AtRH2 and AtRH5 helicases to the TBSV (−)RNA could unwind the dsRNA structure within the RIII(−) REN. This unique characteristic allows the eIF4AIII-like helicases to perform novel pro-viral functions involving the RIII(−) REN in stimulation of plus-strand (+)RNA synthesis. We also show that AtRH2 and AtRH5 helicases are components of the tombusvirus VRCs based on co-purification experiments. We propose that eIF4AIII-like helicases destabilize dsRNA replication intermediate within the RIII(−) REN that promotes bringing the 5′ and 3′ terminal (−)RNA sequences in close vicinity via long-range RNA-RNA base pairing. This newly formed RNA structure promoted by eIF4AIII helicase together with AtRH20 helicase might facilitate the recycling of the viral replicases for multiple rounds of (+)-strand synthesis, thus resulting in asymmetrical viral replication.     

Replication of mycoplasmavirus MVL51: I. Replicative intermediates.

The intracellular replication of the single stranded DNA of the non-lytic bullet-shaped Group L1 mycoplasmavirus, MVL51, has been shown to involve three virus specific DNAs: RFI, RFII and SS. The relative sedimentation rates and ethidium bromide CsCl gradient analysis show that RFI is covalently closed circular double stranded DNA and RFII is a nicked form of RFI. SS is circular single stranded progeny viral DNA. RFI and RFII serve as precursors for the synthesis of progeny SS.     

The Carboxy-Terminal Segment of the Human Cytomegalovirus DNA Polymerase Accessory Subunit UL44 Is Crucial for Viral Replication

The amino-terminal 290 residues of UL44, the presumed processivity factor of human cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase, possess all of the established biochemical activities of the full-length protein, while the carboxy-terminal 143 residues contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS). We found that although the amino-terminal domain was sufficient for origin-dependent synthesis in a transient-transfection assay, the carboxy-terminal segment was crucial for virus replication and for the formation of DNA replication compartments in infected cells, even when this segment was replaced with a simian virus 40 NLS that ensured nuclear localization. Our results suggest a role for this segment in viral DNA synthesis.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) encodes a DNA polymerase which is composed of two subunits, UL54, the catalytic subunit, and UL44, an accessory protein (8, 12, 21). UL44 can be divided into two regions, a 290-residue amino (N)-terminal domain and a 143-residue carboxy (C)-terminal segment. The overall fold of the N-terminal domain is markedly similar to that of processivity factors such as herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) UL42 and eukaryotic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (6, 22, 41), which function to tether catalytic subunits to DNA to ensure long-chain DNA synthesis. In vitro, the N-terminal domain of UL44 is sufficient for all of the established biochemical activities of full-length UL44, including dimerization, binding to double-stranded DNA, interaction with UL54, and stimulation of long-chain DNA synthesis, consistent with a role as a processivity factor (4, 5, 8, 11, 23, 24, 39). In contrast, little is known about the functions of the C-terminal segment of UL44 other than its having been reported from transfection experiments to be important for downregulation of transactivation of a non-HCMV promoter (7) and to contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (3). Neither the importance of this NLS nor the role of the entire C-terminal segment has been investigated in HCMV-infected cells.We first examined whether the N-terminal domain is sufficient to support DNA synthesis from HCMV oriLyt in cells using a previously described cotransfection-replication assay (27, 28). A DpnI-resistant fragment, indicative of oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis, was detected in the presence of wild-type (WT) UL44 (pSI-UL44) (34) and in the presence of the UL44 N-terminal domain (pSI-UL44ΔC290), but not in the presence of UL44-F121A (6, 34), a mutant form previously shown not to support oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis (34) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). Thus, the N-terminal domain alone is sufficient to support oriLyt-dependent DNA synthesis in a transient-transfection assay.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Effects of UL44 C-terminal truncations in various assays. (A) HFF cells were cotransfected with the pSP50 plasmid (containing the oriLyt DNA replication origin), a plasmid expressing WT or mutant UL44 (as indicated at the top of the panel), and plasmids expressing all of the other essential HCMV DNA replication proteins. At 5 days posttransfection, total DNA was extracted and cleaved with DpnI to digest unreplicated DNA and a Southern blot assay was performed to detect replicated pSP50. An arrow indicates DpnI-resistant, newly synthesized pSP50 fragments. (B) FLAG-tagged constructs analyzed in panel C are cartooned as horizontal bars. The names of the constructs are above the bars. The lengths of the constructs in amino acids are indicated by the scale at the bottom of the panel. The positions of residues required but not necessarily sufficient for features of the constructs are designated by shading, as indicated at the bottom of the panel. (C) Vero cells were transfected with plasmids expressing WT UL44 (parts a to c), FLAG-UL44 (parts d to f), FLAG-UL44-290stop (parts g to i), or FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (parts j to l). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were fixed and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to visualize the nucleus (blue) (parts a, d, g, and j) and by IF with anti-UL44 (part b) or anti-FLAG (parts e, h, and k) and a secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa 488 (green). Parts c, f, i, and l are merged from images in the left and middle columns. Magnification: ×1,000. (D) Replication kinetics of rescued viruses. Rescued derivatives of UL44 mutant viruses (UL44-290stop-R and UL44-290NLSstop-R) or WT AD169 viruses were used to infect HFF cells at an MOI of 1 PFU/cell. The supernatants from infected cells were collected every 24 h, and viral titers were determined by plaque assays on HFF cells.These results were somewhat unexpected, as the C-terminal segment contains a functional NLS identified in transfection assays (3). We therefore assayed the intracellular localization of WT and mutant UL44 following transient transfection using pcDNA3-derived expression plasmids. Since the anti-UL44 antibodies that we have tested do not recognize the N-terminal domain of UL44, we constructed UL44 genes to encode N-terminally FLAG-tagged full-length UL44 (FLAG-UL44) or a FLAG-tagged N-terminal domain, the latter by inserting three in-frame tandem stop codons after codon 290 (FLAG-UL44-290stop, Fig. ​Fig.1B).1B). We also constructed a mutant form encoding a FLAG-tagged N-terminal domain, followed by the simian virus 40 (SV40) T-antigen NLS (15-17), followed by three tandem stop codons (FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, Fig. ​Fig.1B).1B). Vero cells were transfected with each construct using Lipofectamine 2000, fixed with 4% formaldehyde at 48 h posttransfection, and assayed by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) using anti-UL44 (Virusys) or anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma). We observed mostly nuclear localization of WT UL44 or FLAG-UL44 with either diffuse or more localized intranuclear distribution (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts a to c and d to f, respectively) and some occasional perinuclear staining, which may be due to protein overexpression. In cells expressing FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, we observed mostly diffuse nuclear localization with little to no perinuclear staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts j to l). In cells expressing FLAG-UL44-290stop, we observed mostly cytoplasmic staining, but with some cells exhibiting some nuclear staining (Fig. ​(Fig.1C,1C, parts g to i), which may explain the ability of truncated UL44 to support oriLyt-dependent DNA replication in a transient-transfection assay (Fig. ​(Fig.1A1A).We next investigated whether the C-terminal segment of UL44 is necessary for viral replication. We reasoned that we could investigate whether any requirement for this segment could be due to a requirement for an NLS by testing whether the SV40 NLS could substitute for the loss of the UL44 C terminus. We therefore constructed HCMV UL44 mutant viruses by introducing the UL44-290stop and UL44-290NLSstop mutations into a WT AD169 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) using two-step red-mediated recombination as previously described (35, 38). We also constructed the same mutants with a FLAG epitope at the N terminus of UL44 (BAC-FLAG-UL44-290stop and BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop) to monitor UL44 expression, and we constructed rescued derivatives of the mutant BACs by replacing the mutated sequences with WT UL44 sequences, as described previously (35). We introduced BACs into human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells using electroporation (35, 38). In several experiments using at least two independent clones for each mutant, cells electroporated with any of the mutant BACs did not exhibit any cytopathic effect (CPE) within 21 days. In contrast, within 7 to 10 days, cells electroporated with the WT AD169 BAC, a BAC expressing WT UL44 with an N-terminal FLAG tag [AD169-BACF44 (35)], or any of the rescued derivatives began displaying a CPE and yielded infectious virus. The rescued derivatives of the nontagged mutants displayed replication kinetics similar to those of the WT virus following infection at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 PFU/cell (Fig. ​(Fig.1D).1D). The rescued derivatives of the FLAG-tagged mutants also replicated to WT levels (data not shown). Thus, the replication defects of the mutants were due to the introduced mutations that result in truncated UL44 either with or without the SV40 NLS. We therefore conclude that the C-terminal segment of UL44 is required for viral replication.To investigate the stage of viral replication at which the UL44 C-terminal segment is important, we first assayed the subcellular localization of immediate-early proteins IE1 and IE2 and FLAG-UL44 in cells electroporated with BAC DNA expressing the FLAG-tagged WT or the two mutant UL44s using IF at 2 days postelectroporation. IE1/IE2 could be detected diffusely distributed in nuclei of cells electroporated with all three BACs (Fig. 2b, f, and j). In cells electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, FLAG-UL44 was localized largely within the nucleus (Fig. 2c and k, respectively). In contrast, in cells electroporated with BAC-FLAG-UL44-290stop, the FLAG epitope was mainly localized diffusely in the cytoplasm, with only a small amount diffusely distributed in the nucleus (Fig. ​(Fig.2g).2g). These data indicate that IE proteins expressed from mutant BACs are properly localized and suggest that without its C-terminal segment, which includes the NLS identified in transfection assays (3), UL44 cannot efficiently localize to the nucleus in HCMV-infected cells. However, addition of the SV40 NLS was sufficient to efficiently localize the N-terminal domain of UL44 to the nucleus. Thus, the requirement for the C-terminal segment of UL44 for viral replication is not due solely to its NLS.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Localization of IE1/IE2 and FLAG-UL44 proteins in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 (panels a to d), BAC-UL44-290stop (panels e to h), or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (panels i to l). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were fixed and probed with anti-IE1/2 (Virusys) or anti-FLAG (Sigma). Secondary antibodies coupled to fluorophores were used for visualization of IE1/2 (anti-mouse Alexa 594; panels b, f, and j) and FLAG (anti-rabbit Alexa 488; panels c, g, and k) antibodies. DAPI was used to counterstain the nucleus (panels a, e, and i). Panels d, h, and l are merged images of the panels in the other columns. Magnification: ×1,000.We next investigated if the block in viral replication due to the loss of the C-terminal segment could be attributed to a defect in viral DNA synthesis. Cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, and viral DNA accumulation was assayed by quantitative real-time PCR at various times postelectroporation (Fig. ​(Fig.3)3) as previously described (32, 35). In HFFs electroporated with AD169-BACF44, viral DNA began to accumulate above the input levels by 8 days postelectroporation and increased over time, with as much as a 350-fold increase over the input DNA level by 18 days postelectroporation. In contrast, levels of viral DNA in cells electroporated with BAC-UL44-290NLSstop did not increase above input levels, even by 18 days postelectroporation. These data are consistent with the notion that the UL44 C-terminal segment is required for viral DNA synthesis, although we caution that the assay did not detect DNA synthesis from AD169-BACF44 until day 8, when viral spread had likely occurred (see below).Open in a separate windowFIG. 3.Quantification of viral DNA accumulation in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, and total DNA was harvested on the days postelectroporation indicated. Viral DNA accumulation was assessed by real-time PCR by assessing levels of the UL83 gene and normalizing to levels of the cellular β-actin gene (32). The data are presented as the fold increase in normalized viral DNA levels over the amount of input DNA (day 1).We also analyzed the localization patterns of UL44 and UL57, the viral single-stranded DNA binding protein, which is a marker for viral DNA replication compartments (1, 2, 18, 26, 29). At 8 days postelectroporation with AD169-BACF44, UL57 and FLAG-UL44 largely colocalized within a single large intranuclear structure that likely represents a fully formed replication compartment, with some cells containing multiple smaller globular structures within the nucleus that likely represent earlier stages of replication compartments (1, 2, 29) (Fig. 4a to d). Neighboring cells also stained for UL57 and FLAG-UL44, indicative of viral spread. In contrast, in cells electroporated with BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop, UL57 (Fig. ​(Fig.4f)4f) was found in either punctate or small globular structures. This pattern of UL57 staining resembled that observed at very early stages of viral DNA synthesis in HCMV-infected cells, but the structures were larger and less numerous than those observed in HCMV-infected cells in the presence of a viral DNA polymerase inhibitor (2, 29). Staining for FLAG-UL44 was nuclear and largely diffuse, with some areas of more concentrated staining (Fig. ​(Fig.4g),4g), which could also be observed in some cells at day 2 postelectroporation (Fig. ​(Fig.3k).3k). This pattern of UL44 localization was generally similar to that observed in HCMV-infected cells at very early stages of infection or when HCMV DNA synthesis is blocked and also similar to the pattern in cells transfected with a UL84 null mutant BAC (2, 29, 33, 40). Importantly, little colocalization of UL57 and UL44 was observed, with areas of concentration of UL57 or UL44 occupying separate regions in the nuclei of these cells (Fig. ​(Fig.4h).4h). We are unaware of any other examples of this pattern of localization of these proteins in HCMV-infected cells and suggest that it may be a result of the loss of the UL44 C-terminal segment. These results indicate that this segment is important for efficient formation of viral DNA replication compartments, again consistent with a requirement for this portion of UL44 for viral DNA synthesis.Open in a separate windowFIG. 4.Localization of UL57 and FLAG-UL44 proteins in electroporated cells. HFF cells were electroporated with AD169-BACF44 (panels a to d) or BAC-FLAG-UL44-290NLSstop (panels e to h). At 8 days posttransfection, cells were fixed and then stained with antibodies specific for UL57 (Virusys) or FLAG (Sigma), followed by a secondary antibody coupled to fluorophores to detect UL57 (anti-mouse Alexa 594; panels b and f) and FLAG (anti-rabbit Alexa 488; panels c and g) antibodies. DAPI stain was used to counterstain the nucleus (panels a and e). Panels d and h are merged images of the panels in the other columns. White arrows identify punctate UL57 staining. Yellow arrows identify areas of concentration of FLAG-UL44 staining. Magnification: ×1,000.Our results, taken together, argue for a role for the C-terminal segment of UL44 in HCMV-infected cells in efficient nuclear localization of UL44 and a role in viral DNA synthesis beyond its role in nuclear localization. It is possible that this segment interacts with host or viral proteins involved in DNA replication. Of the various proteins reported to interact with UL44 (10, 19, 30, 31, 35-37), interesting candidates include the host protein nucleolin, which has been shown to associate with UL44 and be important for viral DNA synthesis (35), and the viral UL112-113 proteins, which in transfection assays were shown to recruit UL44 to early sites of DNA replication (2, 29, 33). After this paper was submitted, Kim and Ahn reported that the C-terminal segment of UL44 is necessary for interaction with a UL112-113 protein and, similar to our findings, crucial for viral replication (19). However, contrary to our findings, they reported that this segment was not necessary for efficient nuclear localization of UL44 (19). It may well be that the C-terminal segment of UL44 also has some other role later in viral replication, perhaps in gene expression, as has been suggested (7, 13, 14).A virus with a deletion of the C-terminal 150 amino acids of the HSV-1 polymerase accessory subunit UL42 displays no obvious defect in replication (9). Thus, it appears that HSV-1 and HCMV exhibit different requirements for the C-terminal segments of their respective accessory proteins. This and many other differences between these functionally and structurally orthologous proteins (5, 6, 20, 24, 25) suggest considerable selection for different features during evolution.     

Replicative Hybrid of T4 Bacteriophage DNA

Hybrid density replicative T4 DNA was isolated from CsCl, sheared, and reanalyzed in CsCl. The results rule out a branched model for T4 DNA replication and confirm that T4 DNA replicates to a conventional, semiconservative, colinear hybrid.     

Chronic DNA Replication Stress Reduces Replicative Lifespan of Cells by TRP53-Dependent,microRNA-Assisted MCM2-7 Downregulation

Circumstances that compromise efficient DNA replication, such as disruptions to replication fork progression, cause a state known as DNA replication stress (RS). Whereas normally proliferating cells experience low levels of RS, excessive RS from intrinsic or extrinsic sources can trigger cell cycle arrest and senescence. Here, we report that a key driver of RS-induced senescence is active downregulation of the Minichromosome Maintenance 2–7 (MCM2-7) factors that are essential for replication origin licensing and which constitute the replicative helicase core. Proliferating cells produce high levels of MCM2-7 that enable formation of dormant origins that can be activated in response to acute, experimentally-induced RS. However, little is known about how physiological RS levels impact MCM2-7 regulation. We found that chronic exposure of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) to either genetically-encoded or environmentally-induced RS triggered gradual MCM2-7 repression, followed by inhibition of replication and senescence that could be accelerated by MCM hemizygosity. The MCM2-7 reduction in response to RS is TRP53-dependent, and involves a group of Trp53-dependent miRNAs, including the miR-34 family, that repress MCM expression in replication-stressed cells before they undergo terminal cell cycle arrest. miR-34 ablation partially rescued MCM2-7 downregulation and genomic instability in mice with endogenous RS. Together, these data demonstrate that active MCM2-7 repression is a physiologically important mechanism for RS-induced cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance on an organismal level.     

Replication of Bacteriophage Ribonucleic Acid: Some Properties of Native and Denatured Replicative Intermediate

Purified replicative form (RF) and replicative intermediate (RI) prepared from Escherichia coli cells infected with the ribonucleic acid (RNA) bacteriophage R17 were denatured with dimethyl sulfoxide at 37 C or in aqueous solvents of low ionic strength at 97 C. Denaturation was demonstrated for RF and RI by an increase in specific infectivity and a striking change in the hyperchromicity curves after treatment. RI denaturation was also demonstrated by a shift in the buoyant density in Cs(2)SO(4) from 1.619 to the buoyant density of single-stranded R17 RNA (1.627). Analysis of the denatured RI hyperchromicity curves and the equilibrium distributions of denatured RI in Cs(2)SO(4) gradients revealed, however, a residual double-stranded component. Velocity sedimentation of denatured RI was performed, and the weight distribution of S values was calculated. From the known relation between molecular weight and S values, it was possible to transform the weight distribution into a number distribution of chain lengths. This distribution was compared with that predicted from the steady-state hypothesis for RI. Deviations from the predicted distribution may be due to the residual double-stranded component.