Human cells enter mitosis with damaged DNA after treatment with pharmacological concentrations of genotoxic agents

In the present paper, we report that mitosis is a key step in the cellular response to genotoxic agents in human cells. Cells with damaged DNA recruit γH2AX (phosphorylated histone H2AX), phosphorylate Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) and arrest in the G2-phase of the cell cycle. Strikingly, nearly all cells escape the DNA damage checkpoint and become rounded, by a mechanism that correlates with Chk1 dephosphorylation. The rounded cells are alive and in mitosis as measured by low phospho-Tyr15 Cdk1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1), high Cdk activity, active Plk1 (Polo-like kinase 1) and high phospho-histone H3 signals. This phenomenon is independent of the type of DNA damage, but is dependent on pharmacologically relevant doses of genotoxicity. Entry into mitosis is likely to be caused by checkpoint adaptation, and the HT-29 cell-based model provides a powerful experimental system in which to explore its molecular basis. We propose that mitosis with damaged DNA is a biologically significant event because it may cause genomic rearrangement in cells that survive genotoxic damage.     

Activation of DNA damage response signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells

Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) are characterized by high proliferation activity. mESC are highly sensitive to genotoxic stresses and do not undergo G1/S checkpoint upon DNA-damage. mESC are supposed to develop sensitive mechanisms to maintain genomic integrity provided by either DNA damage repair or elimination of defected cells by apoptosis. The issue of how mESC recognize the damages and execute DNA repair remains to be studied. We analyzed the kinetics of DNA repair foci marked by antibodies to phosphorylated ATM kinase and histone H2AX (γH2AX). We showed that mESC display non-induced DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), as revealed by comet-assay, and a noticeable background of γH2AX staining. Exposure of mESC to γ-irradiation induced the accumulation of phosphorylated ATM-kinase in the nucleus as well as the formation of additional γH2AX foci, which disappeared thereafter. To decrease the background of γH2AX staining in control non-irradiated cells, we pre-synchronized mESC at the G2/M by low concentration of nocodazol for a short time (6 h). The cells were then irradiated and stained for γH2AX. Irradiation induced the formation of γH2AX foci both in G2-phase and mitotic cells, which evidenced for the active state of DNA-damage signaling at these stages of the cell cycle in mESC. Due to the G1/S checkpoint is compromised in mESCs, we checked, whether wild-type p53, a target for ATM kinase, was phosphorylated in response to γ-irradiation. The p53 was barely phosphorylated in response to irradiation, which correlated with a very low expression of p53-target p21/Waf1 gene. Thus, in spite of the dysfunction of the p53/Waf1 pathway and the lack of cell cycle checkpoints, the mESC are capable of activating ATM and inducing γH2AX foci formation, which are necessary for the activation of DNA damage response.     

Histone deacetylase inhibitors trigger a G2 checkpoint in normal cells that is defective in tumor cells

Important aspects of cell cycle regulation are the checkpoints, which respond to a variety of cellular stresses to inhibit cell cycle progression and act as protective mechanisms to ensure genomic integrity. An increasing number of tumor suppressors are being demonstrated to have roles in checkpoint mechanisms, implying that checkpoint dysfunction is likely to be a common feature of cancers. Here we report that histone deacetylase inhibitors, in particular azelaic bishydroxamic acid, triggers a G2 phase cell cycle checkpoint response in normal human cells, and this checkpoint is defective in a range of tumor cell lines. Loss of this G2 checkpoint results in the tumor cells undergoing an aberrant mitosis resulting in fractured multinuclei and micronuclei and eventually cell death. This histone deacetylase inhibitor-sensitive checkpoint appears to be distinct from G2/M checkpoints activated by genotoxins and microtubule poisons and may be the human homologue of a yeast G2 checkpoint, which responds to aberrant histone acetylation states. Azelaic bishydroxamic acid may represent a new class of anticancer drugs with selective toxicity based on its ability to target a dysfunctional checkpoint mechanism in tumor cells.     

Activation of DNA damage response pathways in human mesenchymal stem cells exposed to cisplatin or γ-irradiation

DNA damaging agents are widely used in treatment of hematogical malignancies and solid tumors. While effects on hematopoietic stem cells have been characterized, less is known about the DNA damage response in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) in the bone marrow stroma, progenitors of osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes. To elucidate the response of undifferentiated hMSCs to γ-irradiation and cisplatin, key DNA damage responses have been characterised in hMSCs from normal adult donors. Cisplatin and γ-irradiation activated the DNA damage response in hMSCs, including induction of p53 and p21, and activation of PI3 kinase-related protein kinase (PIKK)-dependent phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139, and replication protein A2 on serine4/serine8. Chemical inhibition of ATM or DNA-PK reduced DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of H2AX, indicating a role for both PIKKs in the response of hMSCs to DNA damage. Consistent with repair of DNA strand breaks, γ-H2AX staining decreased by 24 hours following gamma-irradiation. γ-irradiation arrested hMSCs in the G₁ phase of the cell cycle, while cisplatin induced S-phase arrest, mediated in part by the ATR/Chk1 checkpoint pathway. In hMSCs isolated from a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patient, p53 and p21 were induced by cisplatin and γ-irradiation, while RPA2 was phosphorylated on serine4/8 in particular following cisplatin. Compared to peripheral blood lymphocytes or the leukemia cell line K562, both normal hMSCs and CLL-derived hMSCs were more resistant to cisplatin and γ-irradiation. These results provide insights into key pathways mediating the response of bone marrow-derived hMSCs to DNA damaging agents used in cancer treatment.     

DNA lesions sequestered in micronuclei induce a local defective-damage response

Micronuclei are good markers of chromosome instability and, among other disturbances, are closely related to double-strand break induction. The ability of DNA lesions sequestered in the micronuclear bodies to activate the complex damage-signalling network is highly controversial since some repair factors have not been consistently detected inside micronuclei. In order to better understand the efficiency of the response induced by micronuclear DNA damage, we have analyzed the presence of DNA damage-response factors and DNA degradation markers in these structures. Radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks produce a modification of chromatin structural proteins, such as the H2AX histone, which is rapidly phosphorylated around the break site. Strikingly, we have been able to distinguish two different phosphoH2AX (γH2AX) labelling patterns in micronuclei: discrete foci, indicating DSB presence, and uniform labelling affecting the whole micronucleus, pointing to genomic DNA fragmentation. At early post-irradiation times we observed a high fraction of micronuclei displaying γH2AX foci. Co-localization experiments showed that only a small fraction of the DSBs in micronuclei were able to properly recruit the p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) and the meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11). We suggest that trafficking defects through the micronuclear envelope compromise the recruitment of DNA damage-response factors. In contrast to micronuclei displaying γH2AX foci, we observed that micronuclei showing a γH2AX extensive-uniform labelling were more frequently observed at substantial post-irradiation times. By means of TUNEL assay, we proved that DNA degradation was carried out inside these micronuclei. Given this scenario, we propose that micronuclei carrying a non-repaired DSB are conduced to their elimination, thus favouring chromosome instability in terms of allele loss.     

Aurora-A controls cancer cell radio- and chemoresistance via ATM/Chk2-mediated DNA repair networks

High expression of Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A) has been found to confer cancer cell radio- and chemoresistance, however, the underlying mechanism is unclear. In this study, by using Aurora-A cDNA/shRNA or the specific inhibitor VX680, we show that Aurora-A upregulates cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and anchorage-independent growth to enhance cell resistance to cisplatin and X-ray irradiation through dysregulation of DNA damage repair networks. Mechanistic studies showed that Aurora-A promoted the expression of ATM/Chk2, but suppressed the expression of BRCA1/2, ATR/Chk1, p53, pp53 (Ser15), H2AX, γH2AX (Ser319), and RAD51. Aurora-A inhibited the focus formation of γH2AX in response to ionizing irradiation. Treatment of cells overexpressing Aurora-A and ATM/Chk2 with the ATM specific inhibitor KU-55933 increased the cell sensitivity to cisplatin and irradiation through increasing the phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and inhibiting the expression of Chk2, γH2AX (Ser319), and RAD51. Further study revealed that BRCA1/2 counteracted the function of Aurora-A to suppress the expression of ATM/Chk2, but to activate the expression of ATR/Chk1, pp53, γH2AX, and RAD51, leading to the enhanced cell sensitivity to irradiation and cisplatin, which was also supported by the results from animal assays. Thus, our data provide strong evidences that Aurora-A and BRCA1/2 inversely control the sensitivity of cancer cells to radio- and chemotherapy through the ATM/Chk2-mediated DNA repair networks, indicating that the DNA repair molecules including ATM/Chk2 may be considered for the targeted therapy against cancers with overexpression of Aurora-A.     

Downregulation of Wip1 phosphatase modulates the cellular threshold of DNA damage signaling in mitosis

Cells are constantly challenged by DNA damage and protect their genome integrity by activation of an evolutionary conserved DNA damage response pathway (DDR). A central core of DDR is composed of a spatiotemporally ordered net of post-translational modifications, among which protein phosphorylation plays a major role. Activation of checkpoint kinases ATM/ATR and Chk1/2 leads to a temporal arrest in cell cycle progression (checkpoint) and allows time for DNA repair. Following DNA repair, cells re-enter the cell cycle by checkpoint recovery. Wip1 phosphatase (also called PPM1D) dephosphorylates multiple proteins involved in DDR and is essential for timely termination of the DDR. Here we have investigated how Wip1 is regulated in the context of the cell cycle. We found that Wip1 activity is downregulated by several mechanisms during mitosis. Wip1 protein abundance increases from G₁ phase to G₂ and declines in mitosis. Decreased abundance of Wip1 during mitosis is caused by proteasomal degradation. In addition, Wip1 is phosphorylated at multiple residues during mitosis, and this leads to inhibition of its enzymatic activity. Importantly, ectopic expression of Wip1 reduced γH2AX staining in mitotic cells and decreased the number of 53BP1 nuclear bodies in G₁ cells. We propose that the combined decrease and inhibition of Wip1 in mitosis decreases the threshold necessary for DDR activation and enables cells to react adequately even to modest levels of DNA damage encountered during unperturbed mitotic progression.     

Cover Picture

HT‐29 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells treated with 30 ?M cisplatin for 72 h express high levels of cyclin B1 (red) prior to undergoing checkpoint adaptation (entry into mitosis with damaged DNA).     

The contribution of DNA replication stress marked by high-intensity,pan-nuclear γH2AX staining to chemosensitization by CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors

Small molecule inhibitors of the checkpoint proteins CHK1 and WEE1 are currently in clinical development in combination with the antimetabolite gemcitabine. It is unclear, however, if there is a therapeutic advantage to CHK1 vs. WEE1 inhibition for chemosensitization. The goals of this study were to directly compare the relative efficacies of the CHK1 inhibitor MK8776 and the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 to sensitize pancreatic cancer cell lines to gemcitabine and to identify pharmacodynamic biomarkers predictive of chemosensitization. Cells treated with gemcitabine and either MK8776 or AZD1775 were first assessed for clonogenic survival. With the exception of the homologous recombination-defective Capan1 cells, which were relatively insensitive to MK8776, we found that these cell lines were similarly sensitized to gemcitabine by CHK1 or WEE1 inhibition. The abilities of either the CDK1/2 inhibitor roscovitine or exogenous nucleosides to prevent MK8776 or AZD1775-mediated chemosensitization, however, were both inhibitor-dependent and variable among cell lines. Given the importance of DNA replication stress to gemcitabine chemosensitization, we next assessed high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining as a pharmacodynamic marker for sensitization. In contrast to total γH2AX, aberrant mitotic entry or sub-G1 DNA content, high-intensity γH2AX staining correlated with chemosensitization by either MK8776 or AZD1775 (R² 0.83 – 0.53). In summary, we found that MK8776 and AZD1775 sensitize to gemcitabine with similar efficacy. Furthermore, our results suggest that the effects of CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition on gemcitabine-mediated replication stress best predict chemosensitization and support the use of high-intensity or pan-nuclear γH2AX staining as a marker for therapeutic response.     

DNA damage during mitosis invokes a JNK‐mediated stress response that leads to cell death

Mitotic catastrophe is a phenomenon displayed by cells undergoing aberrant mitosis to eliminate cells that fail to repair the errors. Why and how mitotic catastrophe would lead to cell death remains to be resolved and the answer will prove valuable in design of better therapeutic agents that specifically target such cells in mitosis. The antibiotic actinomycin D has been shown to induce chromosomal lesions in lower order organisms as well as in human interphase cells. Relatively few studies have been conducted to elucidate molecular events in the context of mitotic DNA damage. We have previously established a model of mitotic catastrophe in human HeLa cells induced by actinomycin D. Here, we show that actinomycin D induce cellular stress via DNA damage during mitosis. The higher order packing of chromosomes during mitosis might impede efficient DNA repair. γH2AX serves as a marker for DNA repair and active JNK interacts with γH2AX in actinomycin D‐treated mitotic extracts. We believe JNK might be in part, responsible for the phosphorylation of H2AX and thereby, facilitate the propagation of a positive signal for cell death, when repair is not achieved. The mitotic cell activates JNK‐mediated cell death response that progresses through a caspase cascade downstream of the mitochondria. In the mean time, remaining checkpoint signals may be sufficient to put a restraining hand on entry into anaphase and the cell eventually dies in mitosis. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 725–731, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Inhibition of DNA decatenation, but not DNA damage, arrests cells at metaphase

DNA damage by double-strand breaks induces arrest during interphase in mammalian cells. It is not clear whether DNA damage can arrest cells in mitosis. We show here that three human cell lines, HeLa, U2OS, and HCT116, do not delay in mitosis in response to double-strand breaks induced during mitosis by gamma irradiation or by adriamycin. Durable arrest at metaphase occurs, however, with ICRF-193, a topoisomerase II inhibitor that does not damage DNA. Arrest with ICRF-193 is not accompanied by recruitment of Mad2 or Bub1 to kinetochores, nor by phosphorylation of the histone H2AX, indicating arrest by ICRF-193 is not due to activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint, nor is it a response to DNA damage. VP-16, another decatenation inhibitor, induces metaphase arrest only at concentrations well above those that induce DNA damage. We conclude that decatenation failure, but not DNA damage, creates metaphase arrest in mammalian cells.     

DNA damage-sensing kinases mediate the mouse 2-cell embryo's response to genotoxic stress

A critical function of cells is the maintenance of their genomic integrity. A family of phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinases, which includes ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) kinases, play key roles in sensing DNA damage. ATM and ATR were demonstrated in the cleavage stages of mouse embryo development. Genotoxic stress was imposed by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (causes DNA strand breaks) or cisplatin (causes strand cross-links). UV irradiation or cisplatin treatment of 2-cell embryos in the G(2) phase of the cell cycle caused DNA damage as defined by increased phosphorylation of the H2A histone family, member X (H2AFX; previously H2AX) variant. UV irradiation caused a stable G(2)-M arrest, and cisplatin treatment allowed progression through mitosis followed by activation of a G(1)-S checkpoint. Both checkpoints were transformation-related protein 53-independent. Caffeine (inhibits both ATM and ATR), but not KU55933 (ATM-selective inhibitor), reversed the G(2)-M block induced by UV, inferring a primary role for ATR in sensing this form of DNA damage. Caffeine and KU55933 were equally effective in reversing the cisplatin-induced G(1)-S block, implicating ATM as the primary sensing enzyme. Breaching of either checkpoint by treatment with caffeine or KU55933 allowed embryos to progress through several further cell cycles, yet none developed to blastocysts. The results show, to our knowledge for the first time, that the G(2)-M and G(1)-S cell-cycle checkpoints in the early embryo are differentially regulated by ATM and ATR in response to genotoxic stress and that they act as an initial point for containment of genomic damage. Under conditions of extensive or persistent DNA damage, the demise of the embryo is the ultimate method of protecting genomic integrity.     

Sentinels of DNA integrity in stem cells: Safeguarding future generations of cells

Integrated into the somatic cell cycle are multi-faceted mechanisms to protect genomic fidelity from genotoxic threats occurring during cell division or cellular quiescence. How embryonic stem cells respond to an array of attacks on genomic integrity has been uncertain, particularly in light of embryonic-like rapid cell cycle phases versus adult cells and the lack of an effective G1/S checkpoint. Whether a DNA damage response is activated similarly to somatic cells or apoptotic pathways used to purge damaged cells are important questions, since the longevity of embryonic stem cells provides opportunities for accumulated mutations and a source for carcinogenic cells. In this issue, Chuyikin et al. investigate the timing and sensitivity of the DNA damage response pathway to double strand breaks (DSBs) in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), validating its responsiveness and providing a comprehensive view of key signaling events.

DNA DSBs are potently mutagenic lesions incurring chromosome breaks, potential rearrangements, mutation and loss of information.¹ The cellular response is immediate, sensitive and persistent, occurring within 30 seconds of damage upon detection of as little as 8 DSBs per cell. The response can be fully active in 15 minutes and persist for hours. Repair is preferred and may elicit checkpoint delays to cell cycle progression, with extreme genotoxic conditions initiating apoptotic pathways. The majority of DSB proteins are activated by PI-3 like kinases, with the primary mammalian response to DSBs occurring via the ATM kinase that is able to respond directly to DSBs. Phosphorylated downstream targets include the uncommon histone, H2AX. This histone provides a cytological platform at DSB sites for the recruitment of DSB mediator and effector proteins such as MDC1 and NBS1. To this scaffold further DSB proteins are recruited, amplifying the signal. NBS1 is part of the MRN complex that includes MRE11 and Rad50 and mediates nuclear localization of the complex to the DNA for stabilizing chromatin ends. The nucleolytic processing of DNA ends by MRE11 resection triggers a second pathway modulated by ATR, that responds to RPA coated ssDNA. Chuyikin et al., used antibodies to phosphorylated ATM and H2AX (pATM, pH2AX) as sensitive temporal markers of DNA repair foci that form at DSBs and followed these events through the cell cycle.

In fast proliferating undifferentiated cells an increase in single strand DNA breaks (SSBs) is typically observed, attributed to ongoing DNA replication, and not generally considered mutagenic. Chuyikin et al. used sensitive comet assays along with pH2AX and pATM antibodies to confirm the presence of SSBs in mESCs and a low background of pH2AX positive/pATM absent poised foci. Upon γ-irradiation to induce DSBs, dramatic detection of DNA repair foci including both pH2AX and pATM occurs. FACs analysis indicated no cell cycle arrest at G1/S from γ-irradiation, although a slight delay at G2/M. Chuyikin et al. did find that mESCs have an active spindle assembly checkpoint allowing cells to be blocked at G2/M with nocodazole and then released synchronously through the cell cycle. The key to their detection of this checkpoint was a six hour treatment with drug, versus longer timepoints. Indeed Reider and Maiato² have shown that in mammalian cells, spindle assembly checkpoint duration is variable and need not be satisfied to be overridden by adaptation, slippage or leakage, quite unlike the tight cell cycle arrest observed in fungi. Therefore longer treatments with nocodazole to arrest mESCs at this stage would be expected to simply be ineffective and promote further polyploidy by attenuating the mitotic mechanism. The authors detailed analysis of induction of DNA repair foci in all cell cycle stages revealed that all stages generate foci, including metaphase chromosomes in mitosis, although foci were most prominent in G1, G2 phases. Thus the primary response by the ATM pathway in these cells is not limited by cell cycle phase.

The maintenance of genomic fidelity in ESCs may require more enhanced DNA repair³ as well as alternative mechanisms to DNA repair, such as increased apoptosis. Chuyikin et al. observed increased caspase activity triggered after γ-irradiation of mESCs, but found no significant increase in cell death. They also found that protein levels of p53, a downstream target of the ATM kinase that is important for the G1/S checkpoint as well as p53-dependent apoptosis, were comparable to fibroblast cells, however p53 lacked activating phosphorylation. Both of these observations help to explain an ineffective G1/S checkpoint and the need for p53-independent apoptosis.

Additional alternate mechanisms for maintaining genomic integrity ESCs have been reported and contribute. This includes a 100X reduction in mutations versus somatic cells and resistance to oxidative stress. Asymmetry mechanisms,⁴ that are a commonly used means of cellular signaling and polarity from yeast to man may also apply, as in the Cairns immortal strand hypothesis. In 1975 Cairns proposed that stem cells might minimize mutations to their genomes from DNA replication by asymmetric segregation of their DNA. Retention of parental strands in the stem cell and segregation of potential mutation carrying DNAs into non-stem cell or differentiating daughters could reduce the mutation potential.4 Such asymmetric sister chromatid strand segregation is still controversial despite having been observed during mitosis in several stem cell populations. Continued elegant studies, such at that by Chuyikin et al, that define which pathways are present and examine the crosstalk in pathways used to detect, signal, repair and protect genomic integrity will continue to provide exciting new systemic views into stem cells. Our therapeutic use of stem cells in the future including understanding of cellular differentiation and cancer depends on it.

ReferencesRiches LC, et al. Mutagenesis 2008; In press.Rieder CL, et al. Dev Cell 2004; 7:637-51.Maynard S, et al. Stem Cells 2008; In press. Doxsey S, et al. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005; 21:411-34.Cairns J. Genetics 2006; 174:1069-72.Chuykin I, et al. Cell Cycle 2008; 7:In this issue.     

Phosphorylation of histone H2AX in radiation-induced micronuclei

DNA double-strand breaks are thought to precede the formation of most radiation-induced micronuclei. Phosphorylation of the histone H2AX is an early indicator of DNA double-strand breaks. Here we studied the phosphorylation status of the histone H2AX in micronuclei after exposure of cultured cells to ionizing radiation or treatment with colchicine. In human astrocytoma SF268 cells, after exposure to gamma radiation, the proportion of gamma-H2AX-positive to gamma-H2AX-negative micronuclei increases. The majority of the gamma-H2AX-positive micronuclei are centromere-negative. The number of gamma-H2AX-positive micronuclei continues to increase even 24 h postirradiation when most gamma-H2AX foci in the main nucleus have disappeared. In contrast, in normal human fibroblasts (BJ), the proportion of gamma-H2AX-positive to gamma-H2AX-negative micronuclei remains constant, and the majority of the centromere-negative cells are gamma-H2AX-negative. Treatment of both cell lines with colchicine results in mostly centromere-positive, gamma-H2AX-negative micronuclei. Immunostaining revealed co-localization of MDC1 and ATM with gamma-H2AX foci in both main nuclei and micronuclei; however, other repair proteins, such as Rad50, 53BP1 and Rad17, that co-localized with gamma-H2AX foci in the main nuclei were not found in the micronuclei. Combination of the micronucleus assay with gamma-H2AX immunostaining provides new insights into the mechanisms of the formation and fate of micronuclei.     

Loss of Geminin induces rereplication in the presence of functional p53

Strict regulation of DNA replication is essential to ensure proper duplication and segregation of chromosomes during the cell cycle, as its deregulation can lead to genomic instability and cancer. Thus, eukaryotic organisms have evolved multiple mechanisms to restrict DNA replication to once per cell cycle. Here, we show that inactivation of Geminin, an inhibitor of origin licensing, leads to rereplication in human normal and tumor cells within the same cell cycle. We found a CHK1-dependent checkpoint to be activated in rereplicating cells accompanied by formation of gammaH2AX and RAD51 nuclear foci. Abrogation of the checkpoint leads to abortive mitosis and death of rereplicated cells. In addition, we demonstrate that the induction of rereplication is dependent on the replication initiation factors CDT1 and CDC6, and independent of the functional status of p53. These data show that Geminin is required for maintaining genomic stability in human cells.     

DNA-PK is responsible for enhanced phosphorylation of histone H2AX under hypertonic conditions

Exposure of cells to hypertonic medium after X-irradiation results in a 3-4-fold increase in the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (gammaH2AX) at sites of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. This increase was previously associated with salt-induced radiosensitization and inhibition of repair of DNA double-strand breaks. To examine possible mechanisms for the increase in foci size, chemical inhibitors of kinase and phosphatase activity and cell lines deficient in ATM and DNA-PK, two kinases known to phosphorylate H2AX, were examined. H2AX kinase and phosphatase activity were maintained in the presence of high salt. ATM mutant HT144 melanoma cells showed the expected 3-4-fold increase in H2AX phosphorylation in the presence of 0.5M Na(+). However, DNA-PKcs deficient M059J cells failed to respond to hypertonic treatment and M059J Fus1 cells corrected for this deficiency showed the expected increase in foci size. Although the active phosphoform of ATM, phosphoserine-1981, increased after irradiation, the level was unaffected by the addition of 0.5M Na(+). Instead, 0.5M Na(+) caused a partial redistribution of serine-1981-ATM to perinuclear regions. Hypertonic medium added after irradiation was effective in inhibiting rejoining of the radiation-induced double-strand breaks even in DNA-PK deficient M059J cells. We suggest that hypertonic treatment following irradiation inhibits double-strand break rejoining that in turn maintains DNA-PK activity at the site of the break, enhancing the size of the gammaH2AX foci.     

Influence of chk1 and plk1 silencing on radiation- or cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human malignant cells

The G2/M checkpoint is an attractive pathway for targeting and sensitizing tumor cells to cancer treatment. Abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint by targeting molecules, such as checkpoint kinase 1 (chk1), increases DNA breakage and sensitizes tumor cells to anti-tumoral agents. However, most of the previously described G2/M abrogators are actually targeting the G2-M border checkpoints rather than mitotic checkpoints. This prompted us to test the effects of combined targeting of chk1 and a critical regulator of mitosis, polo-like kinase 1 (plk1). Chk1 and plk1 were found to be co-expressed in 70% of primary neoplastic tissues we examined. Asynchronized tumor cells were treated with different DNA damaging-agents to activate G1/S, S or G2/M checkpoints. Either chk1 or plk1-specific antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ASODN) enhanced DNA damaging agent-induced apoptosis. When used in combination, however, chk1- plus plk1-specific ASODN failed to produce synergistic effects. Moreover, selective targeting of plk1 or chk1 in tumor xenografts of mice by oncolytic adenovirus mutants demonstrated potent anti-tumoral efficacy in the presence of low dose cisplatin. Again, combined targeting of chk1 and plk1 did not further enhance anti-tumoral efficacy. We concluded that combined targeting of chk1 and plk1 was not superior to either targeting chk1 or plk1 alone, which suggested that chk1 and plk1 silencing might overlap in their mechanism of action. Whether combined targeting of chk1 with other, more specific mitotic regulators would synergistically sensitize tumor to anti-neoplastic therapeutics needs to be further clarified. Qinglei Gao and Xiaoyuan Huang contributed equally to this work.     

Genomic instability,inflammatory signaling and response to cancer immunotherapy

Genomic and chromosomal instability are hallmarks of cancer and shape the genomic composition of cancer cells, thereby determining their behavior and response to treatment. Various genetic and epigenetic alterations in cancer have been linked to genomic instability, including DNA repair defects, oncogene-induced replication stress, and spindle assembly checkpoint malfunction. A consequence of genomic and chromosomal instability is the leakage of DNA from the nucleus into the cytoplasm, either directly or through the formation and subsequent rupture of micronuclei. Cytoplasmic DNA subsequently activates cytoplasmic DNA sensors, triggering downstream pathways, including a type I interferon response. This inflammatory signaling has pleiotropic effects, including enhanced anti-tumor immunity and potentially results in sensitization of cancer cells to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, cancers frequently evolve mechanisms to avoid immune clearance, including suppression of inflammatory signaling. In this review, we summarize inflammatory signaling pathways induced by various sources of genomic instability, adaptation mechanisms that suppress inflammatory signaling, and implications for cancer immunotherapy.