The mother-bud neck as a signaling platform for the coordination between spindle position and cytokinesis in budding yeast

During asymmetric cell division, spindle positioning is critical for ensuring the unequal inheritance of polarity factors. In budding yeast, the mother-bud neck determines the cleavage plane and a correct nuclear division between mother and daughter cell requires orientation of the mitotic spindle along the mother-bud axis. A surveillance device called the spindle position/orientation checkpoint (SPOC) oversees this process and delays mitotic exit and cytokinesis until the spindle is properly oriented along the division axis, thus ensuring genome stability. Cytoskeletal proteins called septins form a ring at the bud neck that is essential for cytokinesis. Furthermore, septins and septin-associated proteins are implicated in spindle positioning and SPOC. In this review, we discuss the emerging connections between septins and the SPOC and the role of the mother-bud neck as a signaling platform to couple proper chromosome segregation to cytokinesis.     

MAP4 and CLASP1 operate as a safety mechanism to maintain a stable spindle position in mitosis

Correct positioning of the mitotic spindle is critical to establish the correct cell-division plane. Spindle positioning involves capture of astral microtubules and generation of pushing/pulling forces at the cell cortex. Here we show that the tau-related protein MAP4 and the microtubule rescue factor CLASP1 are essential for maintaining spindle position and the correct cell-division axis in human cells. We propose that CLASP1 is required to correctly capture astral microtubules, whereas MAP4 prevents engagement of excess dynein motors, thereby protecting the system from force imbalance. Consistent with this, MAP4 physically interacts with dynein-dynactin in vivo and inhibits dynein-mediated microtubule sliding in vitro. Depletion of MAP4, but not CLASP1, causes spindle misorientation in the vertical plane, demonstrating that force generators are under spatial control. These findings have wide biological importance, because spindle positioning is essential during embryogenesis and stem-cell homeostasis.     

Rho GTPases regulate PRK2/PKN2 to control entry into mitosis and exit from cytokinesis

Rho GTPases regulate multiple signal transduction pathways that influence many aspects of cell behaviour, including migration, morphology, polarity and cell cycle. Through their ability to control the assembly and organization of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, Rho and Cdc42 make several key contributions during the mitotic phase of the cell cycle, including spindle assembly, spindle positioning, cleavage furrow contraction and abscission. We now report that PRK2/PKN2, a Ser/Thr kinase and Rho/Rac effector protein, is an essential regulator of both entry into mitosis and exit from cytokinesis in HeLa S3 cells. PRK2 is required for abscission of the midbody at the end of the cell division cycle and for phosphorylation and activation of Cdc25B, the phosphatase required for activation of mitotic cyclin/Cdk1 complexes at the G2/M transition. This reveals an additional step in the mammalian cell cycle controlled by Rho GTPases.     

Control of spindle polarity and orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Control of mitotic spindle orientation represents a major strategy for the generation of cell diversity during development of metazoans. Studies in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have contributed towards our present understanding of the general principles underlying the regulation of spindle positioning in an asymmetrically dividing cell. In S. cerevisiae, the mitotic spindle must orient along the cell polarity axis, defined by the site of bud emergence, to ensure correct nuclear division between the mother and daughter cells. Establishment of spindle polarity dictates this process and relies on the concerted control of spindle pole function and a precise program of cues originating from the cell cortex that directs cytoplasmic microtubule attachments during spindle morphogenesis. These cues cross talk with the machinery responsible for bud-site selection, indicating that orientation of the spindle in yeast cells is mechanistically coupled to the definition of a polarity axis and the division plane. Here, we propose a model integrating the inherently asymmetric properties of the spindle pathway with the program of positional information contributing towards orienting the spindle in budding yeast. Because the basic machinery orienting the spindle in higher-eukaryotic cells appears to be conserved, it might be expected that similar principles govern centrosome asymmetry in the course of metazoan development.     

Separate to operate: control of centrosome positioning and separation

The centrosome is the main microtubule (MT)-organizing centre of animal cells. It consists of two centrioles and a multi-layered proteinaceous structure that surrounds the centrioles, the so-called pericentriolar material. Centrosomes promote de novo assembly of MTs and thus play important roles in Golgi organization, cell polarity, cell motility and the organization of the mitotic spindle. To execute these functions, centrosomes have to adopt particular cellular positions. Actin and MT networks and the association of the centrosomes to the nuclear envelope define the correct positioning of the centrosomes. Another important feature of centrosomes is the centrosomal linker that connects the two centrosomes. The centrosome linker assembles in late mitosis/G1 simultaneously with centriole disengagement and is dissolved before or at the beginning of mitosis. Linker dissolution is important for mitotic spindle formation, and its cell cycle timing has profound influences on the execution of mitosis and proficiency of chromosome segregation. In this review, we will focus on the mechanisms of centrosome positioning and separation, and describe their functions and mechanisms in the light of recent findings.     

Distinct roles for Galpha and Gbetagamma in regulating spindle position and orientation in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos

Correct placement and orientation of the mitotic spindle is essential for segregation of localized components and positioning of daughter cells. Although these processes are important in many cells, few factors that regulate spindle placement are known. Previous work has shown that GPB-1, the Gbeta subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein, is required for orientation of early cell division axes in C. elegans embryos. Here we show that GOA-1 (a Galphao) and the related GPA-16 are the functionally redundant Galpha subunits and that GPC-2 is the relevant Ggamma subunit that is required for spindle orientation in the early embryo. We show that Galpha and Gbetagamma are involved in controlling distinct microtubule-dependent processes. Gbetagamma is important in regulating migration of the centrosome around the nucleus and hence in orientating the mitotic spindle. Galpha is required for asymmetric spindle positioning in the one-celled embryo.     

MISP is a novel Plk1 substrate required for proper spindle orientation and mitotic progression

Precise positioning of the mitotic spindle determines the correct cell division axis and is crucial for organism development. Spindle positioning is mediated through a cortical machinery by capturing astral microtubules, thereby generating pushing/pulling forces at the cell cortex. However, the molecular link between these two structures remains elusive. Here we describe a previously uncharacterized protein, MISP (C19orf21), as a substrate of Plk1 that is required for correct mitotic spindle positioning. MISP is an actin-associated protein throughout the cell cycle. MISP depletion led to an impaired metaphase-to-anaphase transition, which depended on phosphorylation by Plk1. Loss of MISP induced mitotic defects including spindle misorientation accompanied by shortened astral microtubules. Furthermore, we find that MISP formed a complex with and regulated the cortical distribution of the +TIP binding protein p150^glued, a subunit of the dynein–dynactin complex. We propose that Plk1 phosphorylates MISP, thus stabilizing cortical and astral microtubule attachments required for proper mitotic spindle positioning.     

Drosophila atypical protein kinase C associates with Bazooka and controls polarity of epithelia and neuroblasts

The establishment and maintenance of polarity is of fundamental importance for the function of epithelial and neuronal cells. In Drosophila, the multi-PDZ domain protein Bazooka (Baz) is required for establishment of apico-basal polarity in epithelia and in neuroblasts, the stem cells of the central nervous system. In the latter, Baz anchors Inscuteable in the apical cytocortex, which is essential for asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants and for proper orientation of the mitotic spindle. Here we show that Baz directly binds to the Drosophila atypical isoform of protein kinase C and that both proteins are mutually dependent on each other for correct apical localization. Loss-of-function mutants of the Drosophila atypical isoform of PKC show loss of apico-basal polarity, multilayering of epithelia, mislocalization of Inscuteable and abnormal spindle orientation in neuroblasts. Together, these data provide strong evidence for the existence of an evolutionary conserved mechanism that controls apico-basal polarity in epithelia and neuronal stem cells. This study is the first functional analysis of an atypical protein kinase C isoform using a loss-of-function allele in a genetically tractable organism.     

Asymmetric spindle positioning

When a spindle is positioned asymmetrically in a dividing cell, the resulting daughter cells are unequal in size. Asymmetric spindle positioning is driven by regulated forces that can pull or push a spindle. The physical and molecular mechanisms that can position spindles asymmetrically have been studied in several systems, and some themes have begun to emerge from recent research. Recent work in budding yeast has presented a model for how cytoskeletal motors and cortical capture molecules can function in orienting and positioning a spindle. The temporal regulation of microtubule-based pulling forces that move a spindle has been examined in one animal system. Although the spindle positioning force generators have not been identified in most animal systems, the forces have been found to be regulated by both PAR polarity proteins and G-protein signaling pathways in more than one animal system.     

Coordinated spindle assembly and orientation requires Clb5p-dependent kinase in budding yeast

The orientation of the mitotic spindle along a polarity axis is critical in asymmetric cell divisions. In the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, loss of the S-phase B-type cyclin Clb5p under conditions of limited cyclin-dependent kinase activity (cdc28-4 clb5Delta cells) causes a spindle positioning defect that results in an undivided nucleus entering the bud. Based on time-lapse digital imaging microscopy of microtubules labeled with green fluorescent protein fusions to either tubulin or dynein, we observed that the asymmetric behavior of the spindle pole bodies during spindle assembly was lost in the cdc28-4 clb5Delta cells. As soon as a spindle formed, both poles were equally likely to interact with the bud cell cortex. Persistent dynamic interactions with the bud ultimately led to spindle translocation across the bud neck. Thus, the mutant failed to assign one spindle pole body the task of organizing astral microtubules towards the mother cell. Our data suggest that Clb5p-associated kinase is required to confer mother-bound behavior to one pole in order to establish correct spindle polarity. In contrast, B-type cyclins, Clb3p and Clb4p, though partially redundant with Clb5p for an early role in spindle morphogenesis, preferentially promote spindle assembly.     

Spindle asymmetry: a compass for the cell

Spatial coordination of the cell-division axis with cellular polarity and/or with the position of neighboring cells is crucial for embryonic development, organogenesis and tissue homeostasis. In most cell types, the position of the mitotic spindle at the onset of anaphase dictates the orientation of the division axis; in unicellular organisms, it plays an important role in chromosome segregation. Cortical factors play a key role in the orientation of the spindle. Recent data from yeast reveal that the spindle does not passively react to cortical signals but actively interprets them to find its correct position. We review the data leading to a "compass model" for spindle positioning and discuss its potential generality.     

The novel actin/focal adhesion-associated protein MISP is involved in mitotic spindle positioning in human cells

Accurate mitotic spindle positioning is essential for the regulation of cell fate choices, cell size and cell position within tissues. The most prominent model of spindle positioning involves a cortical pulling mechanism, where the minus end-directed microtubule motor protein dynein is attached to the cell cortex and exerts pulling forces on the plus ends of astral microtubules that reach the cortex. In nonpolarized cultured cells integrin-dependent, retraction fiber-mediated cell adhesion is involved in spindle orientation. Proteins serving as intermediaries between cortical actin or retraction fibers and astral microtubules remain largely unknown. In a recent genome-wide RNAi screen we identified a previously uncharacterized protein, MISP (C19ORF21) as being involved in centrosome clustering, a process leading to the clustering of supernumerary centrosomes in cancer cells into a bipolar mitotic spindle array by microtubule tension. Here, we show that MISP is associated with the actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions and is expressed only in adherent cell types. During mitosis MISP is phosphorylated by Cdk1 and localizes to retraction fibers. MISP interacts with the +TIP EB1 and p150^glued, a subunit of the dynein/dynactin complex. Depletion of MISP causes mitotic arrest with reduced tension across sister kinetochores, chromosome misalignment and spindle multipolarity in cancer cells with supernumerary centrosomes. Analysis of spindle orientation revealed that MISP depletion causes randomization of mitotic spindle positioning relative to cell axes and cell center. Together, we propose that MISP links microtubules to the actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions in order to properly position the mitotic spindle.     

NuMA phosphorylation by CDK1 couples mitotic progression with cortical dynein function

Spindle positioning and spindle elongation are critical for proper cell division. In human cells, an evolutionary conserved ternary complex (NuMA/LGN/Gαi) anchors dynein at the cortex during metaphase, thus ensuring correct spindle positioning. Whether this complex contributes to anaphase spindle elongation is not known. More generally, the mechanisms coupling mitotic progression with spindle behaviour remain elusive. Here, we uncover that levels of cortical dynein markedly increase during anaphase in a NuMA‐dependent manner. We demonstrate that during metaphase, CDK1‐mediated phosphorylation at T2055 negatively regulates NuMA cortical localization and that this phosphorylation is counteracted by PPP2CA phosphatase activity. We establish that this tug of war is essential for proper levels of cortical dynein and thus spindle positioning during metaphase. Moreover, we find that upon CDK1 inactivation in anaphase, the rise in dephosphorylated NuMA at the cell cortex leads to cortical dynein enrichment, and thus to robust spindle elongation. Our findings uncover a mechanism whereby the status of NuMA phosphorylation coordinates mitotic progression with proper spindle function.     

Mammalian spindle orientation and position respond to changes in cell shape in a dynein-dependent fashion

In animal cells, positioning of the mitotic spindle is crucial for defining the plane of cytokinesis and the size ratio of daughter cells. We have characterized this phenomenon in a rat epithelial cell line using microscopy, micromanipulation, and microinjection. Unmanipulated cells position the mitotic spindle near their geometric center, with the spindle axis lying roughly parallel to the long axis of the cell. Spindles that were initially misoriented underwent directed rotation and caused a delay in anaphase onset. To gain further insight into this process, we gently deformed cells with a blunted glass needle to change the spatial relationship between the cortex and spindle. This manipulation induced spindle movement or rotation in metaphase and/or anaphase, until the spindle reached a proper position relative to the deformed shape. Spindle positioning was inhibited by either treatment with low doses of nocodazole or microinjection of antibodies against dynein, apparently due to the disruption of the organization of dynein and/or astral microtubules. Our results suggest that mitotic cells continuously monitor and maintain the position of the spindle relative to the cortex. This process is likely driven by interactions among astral microtubules, the motor protein dynein, and the cell cortex and may constitute part of a mitotic checkpoint mechanism.     

Two PAR6 proteins become asymmetrically localized during establishment of polarity in mouse oocytes

Meiotic maturation in mammals is characterized by two asymmetric divisions, leading to the formation of two polar bodies and the female gamete. Whereas the mouse oocyte is a polarized cell, molecules implicated in the establishment of this polarity are still unknown. PAR proteins have been demonstrated to play an important role in cell polarity in many cell types, where they control spindle positioning and asymmetric distribution of determinants. Here we show that two PAR6-related proteins have distinct polarized distributions in mouse oocytes. mPARD6a is first localized on the spindle and then accumulates at the pole nearest the cortex during spindle migration. In the absence of microtubules, the chromosomes still migrate to the cortex, and mPARD6a was found associated with the chromosomes and was facing the cortex. mPARD6a is the first identified protein to associate with the spindle during spindle migration and to relocalize to the chromosomes in the absence of microtubule behavior, suggesting a role in spindle migration. The other protein, mPARD6b, was found on spindle microtubules until entry into meiosis II and relocalized to the cortex at the animal pole during metaphase II arrest. mPARD6b is the first identified protein to localize to the animal pole of the mouse oocyte and likely contributes to the polarization of the cortex.     

Spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces

Proper spatial control of the cell division plane is essential to any developing organism. In most cell types, the relative size of the two daughter cells is determined by the position of the mitotic spindle within the geometry of the mother cell. We review the underlying mechanisms responsible for positioning of the mitotic spindle, both in cases where the spindle is placed in the center of the cell and in cases where the spindle is placed away from the center of the cell. We discuss the idea that cortical pulling forces are sufficient to provide a general mechanism for spindle positioning within symmetrically and asymmetrically dividing cells.     

EGFR controls IQGAP basolateral membrane localization and mitotic spindle orientation during epithelial morphogenesis

Establishing the correct orientation of the mitotic spindle is an essential step in epithelial cell division in order to ensure that epithelial tubules form correctly during organ development and regeneration. While recent findings have identified some of the molecular mechanisms that underlie spindle orientation, many aspects of this process remain poorly understood. Here, we have used the 3D‐MDCK model system to demonstrate a key role for a newly identified protein complex formed by IQGAP1 and the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) in controlling the orientation of the mitotic spindle. IQGAP1 is a scaffolding protein that regulates many cellular pathways, from cell‐cell adhesion to microtubule organization, and its localization in the basolateral membrane ensures correct spindle orientation. Through its IQ motifs, IQGAP1 binds to EGFR, which is responsible for maintaining IQGAP1 in the basolateral membrane domain. Silencing IQGAP1, or disrupting the basolateral localization of either IQGAP1 or EGFR, results in a non‐polarized distribution of NuMA, mitotic spindle misorientation and defects in single lumen formation.     

Cortical dynein is critical for proper spindle positioning in human cells

Correct spindle positioning is fundamental for proper cell division during development and in stem cell lineages. Dynein and an evolutionarily conserved ternary complex (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein [NuMA]–LGN–Gα in human cells and LIN-5–GPR-1/2–Gα in Caenorhabditis elegans) are required for correct spindle positioning, but their relationship remains incompletely understood. By analyzing fixed specimens and conducting live-imaging experiments, we uncovered that appropriate levels of ternary complex components are critical for dynein-dependent spindle positioning in HeLa cells and C. elegans embryos. Moreover, using mutant versions of Gα in both systems, we established that dynein acts at the membrane to direct spindle positioning. Importantly, we identified a region within NuMA that mediates association with dynein. By using this region to target dynein to the plasma membrane, we demonstrated that the mere presence of dynein at that location is sufficient to direct spindle positioning in HeLa cells. Overall, we propose a model in which the ternary complex serves to anchor dynein at the plasma membrane to ensure correct spindle positioning.     

Positioning and stability of mitotic spindle orientation in the neuroepithelial cell

To verify non-random positioning and to define the stability of the mitotic spindle orientation in neuroepithelial cells of mouse foetuses, computer - assisted morphometric analysis at the light microscopy level was performed. It was confirmed that the mitotic spindle axis is positioned non-randomly in relation to the cell polarity axis and could be displaced only within a narrow range. This orientation was found to be attained at metaphase and it does not change until telophase is completed. However, in relation to the long axis of the neural tube the mitotic spindle axis was found to be positioned randomly. In the light of these findings centrosome movement and positioning are discussed.     

Centrosome as "a brain" of an animal cell

Centrosomes are the major centre of microtubule nucleation and microtubule minus-ends concentration in animal cells. Microtubule plus-ends are directed to a nucleus and chromosomes or to a cell cortex. The crossing of signal transduction pathways and the network of interactions between signal molecules controlling cell cycle are revealed in centrosomes. The ability of centrosomes for reduplication suggests the existence of hypothetic template elements. It is attractive to suggest the essential role of specific centrosome-associated RNAs in biogenesis of centrosomes. Untranslated RNAs playing a structural role and mRNAs that are localized in centrosomes to regulate protein synthesis in close proximity to mitotic apparatus may be present among these RNAs. Centrosomes positioning plays the important role in determining of cell polarity. Centrosomes are critical for the formation and support of cilia and flagella having motility or sensory functions.