Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: electroreceptor physiology

Responses of ampullary and tuberous electroreceptor afferents were studied using moving electrolocation targets and electrical modulations of the animal's electric organ discharge as stimuli. The ability of the electroreceptors to encode these stimuli was measured with and without various forms of electrical jamming signals. The goal of this study was to measure the deterioration in electroreceptor responses due to the jamming signals, and to compare these results with the behavioral measures of electrolocation under the same conditions of jamming as described in the preceding report (Bastian 1987). 1. Three types of jamming stimuli were used to interfere with the tuberous electroreceptor afferents' ability to respond to the test stimuli mentioned above: Broad-band noise, high frequency stimuli consisting of a sinusoidal waveform having a frequency maintained at a chosen difference frequency (DF) from the EOD frequency of the fish being studied, and 5 or 50 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. 2. The tuberous receptor afferents' spontaneous frequency was sensitive to continuous presentation of all but the 5 Hz jamming signals. The 4 Hz DF signal caused the largest increase in spontaneous activity, the 50 Hz stimulus was intermediate in effectiveness, and the noise stimulus caused the smallest increase. Estimates of the variability of the ongoing receptor activity were also made, and both the 4 Hz DF and the 50 Hz stimuli reduced the coefficient of variation of the receptor activity, but noise had no significant effect on this parameter. Noise, 4 Hz DF, and 50 Hz jamming signals also reduced the tuberous receptors' responses to a 100 ms EOD amplitude modulation, and the 5 Hz stimulus was again ineffective. 3. Noise and 4 Hz DF jamming were also effective in reducing tuberous receptor afferents' responses to a moving metal electrolocation target. The 4 Hz DF stimulus was most effective in reducing the receptor's ability to encode information about the target. Receptor responses showed about a three-fold larger decrease per 10 dB increase in DF jamming amplitude as compared to similar sized increases in noise amplitude. Threshold target distances were also determined with and without noise and DF jamming, and again, the noise stimulus was less effective in reducing the distance at which electrolocation targets were just detectable. 4. Recordings from ampullary receptor afferents confirmed that the galvanic potentials produced by metal electrolocation targets stimulate these receptors while EOD distortions caused by such objects probably do not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Differential distribution of ampullary and tuberous processing in the torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia

Summary Gymnotiform electric fish sense low-and high frequency electric signals with ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, respectively. We employed intracellular recording and labeling methods to investigate ampullary and tuberous information processing in laminae 1–5 of the dorsal torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia. Ampullary afferents arborized extensively in laminae 1–3 and, in some cases, lamina 7. Unlike tuberous afferents to the torus, ampullary afferents had numerous varicosities along their finest-diameter branches. Neurons that were primarily ampullary were found in lamina 3. Neurons primarily excited by tuberous stimuli were found in lamina 5 and, more rarely, in lamina 4. Cells that had dendrites in lamina 1–3 and 5 could be recruited by both ampullary and tuberous stimuli. These bimodal cells were found in lamina 4. During courtship, Eigenmannia produces interruptions of its electric organ discharges. These interruptions stimulate ampullary and tuberous receptors. The integration of ampullary and tuberous information may be important in the processing of these communication signals.Abbreviations JAR jamming avoidance response - EOD electric organ discharge - S1 sinusoidal signal mimicking fish's EOD - S2 jamming signal - Df frequency difference (S2-S1) or between a neighbor's EODs and fish's own EODs - CNS central nervous system     

Electroreception,electrogenesis and electric signal evolution

Electroreception, the capacity to detect external underwater electric fields with specialised receptors, is a phylogenetically widespread sensory modality in fishes and amphibians. In passive electroreception, a capacity possessed by c. 16% of fish species, an animal uses low-frequency-tuned ampullary electroreceptors to detect microvolt-range bioelectric fields from prey, without the need to generate its own electric field. In active electroreception (electrolocation), which occurs only in the teleost lineages Mormyroidea and Gymnotiformes, an animal senses its surroundings by generating a weak (< 1 V) electric-organ discharge (EOD) and detecting distortions in the EOD-associated field using high-frequency-tuned tuberous electroreceptors. Tuberous electroreceptors also detect the EODs of neighbouring fishes, facilitating electrocommunication. Several other groups of elasmobranchs and teleosts generate weak (< 10 V) or strong (> 50 V) EODs that facilitate communication or predation, but not electrolocation. Approximately 1.5% of fish species possess electric organs. This review has two aims. First, to synthesise our knowledge of the functional biology and phylogenetic distribution of electroreception and electrogenesis in fishes, with a focus on freshwater taxa and with emphasis on the proximate (morphological, physiological and genetic) bases of EOD and electroreceptor diversity. Second, to describe the diversity, biogeography, ecology and electric signal diversity of the mormyroids and gymnotiforms and to explore the ultimate (evolutionary) bases of signal and receptor diversity in their convergent electrogenic–electrosensory systems. Four sets of potential drivers or moderators of signal diversity are discussed. First, selective forces of an abiotic (environmental) nature for optimal electrolocation and communication performance of the EOD. Second, selective forces of a biotic nature targeting the communication function of the EOD, including sexual selection, reproductive interference from syntopic heterospecifics and selection from eavesdropping predators. Third, non-adaptive drift and, finally, phylogenetic inertia, which may arise from stabilising selection for optimal signal-receptor matching.     

The evolution of electroreception and bioelectrogenesis in teleost fish: a phylogenetic perspective

According to current phylogenetic theory, both electroreceptors and electric organs evolved multiple times throughout the evolution of teleosts. Two basic types of electroreceptors have been described: ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors. Ampullary‐type electroreceptors appeared once in the common ancestor of the Siluriformes+Gymnotiformes (within the superorder Ostariophysi), and on two other occasions within the superorder Osteoglossomorpha: in the African Mormyriformes and in the African Notopteriformes. Tuberous receptors are assumed to have evolved three times; all within groups that already possessed ampullary receptors. With the exception of a single catfish species, for which studies are still lacking, all fish with tuberous electroreceptors also have an electric organ. Tuberous electroreceptors are found in the two unrelated electrogenic teleost lineages (orders Gymnotiformes and Mormyriformes) and in one non‐electrogenic South American catfish species (order Siluriformes). Electric organs evolved eight times independently among teleosts: five of them among the ostariophysans (once in the gymnotiform ancestor and in four siluriform lineages), once in the common ancestor of Mormyriformes, and in two uranoscopids. With the exception of two uranoscopid genera, for which no electroreceptive capabilities have been discovered so far, all electric organs evolved as an extension of a pre‐existing electroreceptive (ampullary) condition. It is suggested that plesiomorphic electric organ discharges (EODs) possessed a frequency spectrum that fully transgressed the tuning curve of ampullary receptors, i.e. a signal such as a long lasting monophasic pulse. Complex EOD waveforms appeared as a derived condition among electric fish. EODs are under constant evolutionary pressure to develop an ideal compromise between a function that enhances electrolocation and electrocommunication capabilities, and thereby ensures species identity through sexual and behavioural segregation, and minimizes the risk of predation.     

Electroreception in the Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis)

Passive electroreception is a widespread sense in fishes and amphibians, but in mammals this sensory ability has previously only been shown in monotremes. While the electroreceptors in fish and amphibians evolved from mechanosensory lateral line organs, those of monotremes are based on cutaneous glands innervated by trigeminal nerves. Electroreceptors evolved from other structures or in other taxa were unknown to date. Here we show that the hairless vibrissal crypts on the rostrum of the Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis), structures originally associated with the mammalian whiskers, serve as electroreceptors. Histological investigations revealed that the vibrissal crypts possess a well-innervated ampullary structure reminiscent of ampullary electroreceptors in other species. Psychophysical experiments with a male Guiana dolphin determined a sensory detection threshold for weak electric fields of 4.6 μV cm(-1), which is comparable to the sensitivity of electroreceptors in platypuses. Our results show that electroreceptors can evolve from a mechanosensory organ that nearly all mammals possess and suggest the discovery of this kind of electroreception in more species, especially those with an aquatic or semi-aquatic lifestyle.     

Effects of global electrosensory signals on motion processing in the midbrain of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eigenmannia</Emphasis>

Wave-type weakly electric fish such as Eigenmannia produce continuous sinusoidal electric fields. When conspecifics are in close proximity, interaction of these electric fields can produce deficits in electrosensory function. We examined a neural correlate of such jamming at the level of the midbrain. Previous results indicate that neurons in the dorsal layers of the torus semicircularis can (1) respond to jamming signals, (2) respond to moving electrosensory stimuli, and (3) receive convergent information from the four sensory maps of the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL). In this study we recorded the intracellular responses of both tuberous and ampullary neurons to moving objects. Robust Gaussian-shaped or sinusoidal responses with half-height durations between 55 ms and 581 ms were seen in both modalities. The addition of ongoing global signals with temporal-frequencies of 5 Hz attenuated the responses to the moving object by 5 dB or more. In contrast, the responses to the moving object were not attenuated by the addition of signals with temporal frequencies of 20 Hz or greater. This occurred in both the ampullary and tuberous systems, despite the fact that the ampullary afferents to the torus originate in a single ELL map whereas the tuberous afferents emerge from three maps.     

The responses of peripheral and central mechanosensory lateral line units of weakly electric fish to moving objects

Mechanosensory lateral line afferents of weakly electric fish (Eigenmannia) responded to an object which moved parallel to the long axis of the fish with phases of increased spike activity separated by phases of below spontaneous activity. Responses increased with object speed but finally may show saturation. At increasingly greater distances the responses decayed as a power function of distance. For different object velocities the exponents (mean±SD) describing this response falloff were -0.71±0.4 (20 cm/s object velocity) and-1.9±1.25 (10 cm/s). Opposite directions of object movement may cause an inversion of the main features of the response histograms. In terms of peak spike rate or total number of spikes elicited, however, primary lateral line afferents were not directionally sensitive.Central (midbrain) lateral line units of weakly electric fish (Apteronotus) showed a jittery response if an object moved by. In midbrain mechanosensory lateral line, ampullary, and tuberous units the response to a rostral-tocaudal object movement may be different from that elicited by a caudal-to-rostral object motion. Central units of Apteronotus may receive input from two or more sensory modalities. Units may be lateral line-tuberous or lateral line-ampullary. Multimodal lateral line units were OR units, i.e., the units were reliably driven by a unimodal stimulus of either modality. The receptive fields of central units demonstrate a weak somatotopic organization of lateral line input: anterior body areas project to rostral midbrain, posterior body areas project to caudal midbrain.Abbreviation EOD electric organ discharge     

Directional characteristics of tuberous electroreceptors in the weakly electric fish,Hypopomus (Gymnotiformes)

This paper is an electrophysiological study of the directionality of the tuberous electroreceptors of weakly electric fish. We recorded from two classes of tuberous electroreceptors known for pulse gymnotiforms: Burst Duration Coders (BDCs), and Pulse Markers (PMs). Both code for stimulus amplitude, although the dynamic range for BDCs is greater, and both exhibit strong directional preferences. Polar plots of spike number (for BDCs) or spike threshold (for PMs) versus electric field azimuth, are figure-8 shaped with two asymmetrical, elliptical lobes separated by 180°. The best azimuth of these two types of receptors from a given body region correlate with each other and with measures of best azimuth for transepidermal current flow. The shape and asymmetry of the directionality profiles appear to be caused by filter dynamics of the receptors. Pulse Markers are located on the anterior part of the body surface while Burst Duration Coders are located all over. The best directions of receptors in the anterior third of the body vary systematically with location from 0° to 180°. This region is probably critical for determining the direction of local electric fields. Together these receptors provide the CNS with sufficient information to construct a map of horizontal plane electric field directions.Abbreviations BDC Burst Duration Coder - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - nALL anterior lateral line nerve - PM Pulse Marker     

Electrosensory ampullary organs are derived from lateral line placodes in cartilaginous fishes

Ampullary organ electroreceptors excited by weak cathodal electric fields are used for hunting by both cartilaginous and non-teleost bony fishes. Despite similarities of neurophysiology and innervation, their embryonic origins remain controversial: bony fish ampullary organs are derived from lateral line placodes, whereas a neural crest origin has been proposed for cartilaginous fish electroreceptors. This calls into question the homology of electroreceptors and ampullary organs in the two lineages of jawed vertebrates. Here, we test the hypothesis that lateral line placodes form electroreceptors in cartilaginous fishes by undertaking the first long-term in vivo fate-mapping study in any cartilaginous fish. Using DiI tracing for up to 70 days in the little skate, Leucoraja erinacea, we show that lateral line placodes form both ampullary electroreceptors and mechanosensory neuromasts. These data confirm the homology of electroreceptors and ampullary organs in cartilaginous and non-teleost bony fishes, and indicate that jawed vertebrates primitively possessed a lateral line placode-derived system of electrosensory ampullary organs and mechanosensory neuromasts.     

The functional characteristics of electroreceptive central neurons of the sea catfish Plotosus anguillaris

With the use of microelectrode techniques (extracellular recordings) and the method of post-stimulus histograms, the functional characteristics of medulla oblongata neurons of sea catfish Plotosus were investigated under stimulation of electroreceptors by a homogeneous electric field of different duration, intensity, and direction. Two types of the cells possessing, accordingly, tonic or phase activity were registered among 66 neurons investigated. The mode of responses (inhibition or acceleration) of tonic neurons to the direction of the applied electric current is typical for central neurons of fresh-water catfish connected with ampullae's electroreceptors. Neurons showing a substantial response to fields of an intensity less than 1 microV/cm were registered. The reactions were most pronounced with the duration of electric stimuli in the range of 20-200 ms; however, particularly sensitive neurons showed distinct responses to stimuli of duration of 5 and even 2 ms. Thus, for the first time a high sensitivity of ampullae's electroreceptors to high-frequency stimulus was discovered, which allows one to expand the range of studying electric signals used by weakly electric fish for electrolocation and communication.     

Passive electroreception in aquatic mammals

Passive electroreception is a sensory modality in many aquatic vertebrates, predominantly fishes. Using passive electroreception, the animal can detect and analyze electric fields in its environment. Most electric fields in the environment are of biogenic origin, often produced by prey items. These electric fields can be relatively strong and can be a highly valuable source of information for a predator, as underlined by the fact that electroreception has evolved multiple times independently. The only mammals that possess electroreception are the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) and the echidnas (Tachyglossidae) from the monotreme order, and, recently discovered, the Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis) from the cetacean order. Here we review the morphology, function and origin of the electroreceptors in the two aquatic species, the platypus and the Guiana dolphin. The morphology shows certain similarities, also similar to ampullary electroreceptors in fishes, that provide cues for the search for electroreceptors in more vertebrate and invertebrate species. The function of these organs appears to be very similar. Both species search for prey animals in low-visibility conditions or while digging in the substrate, and sensory thresholds are within one order of magnitude. The electroreceptors in both species are innervated by the trigeminal nerve. The origin of the accessory structures, however, is completely different; electroreceptors in the platypus have developed from skin glands, in the Guiana dolphin, from the vibrissal system.     

Immunohistochemical identification of substance P in cutaneous sensory organs (electroreceptors) of gymnotid teleost fish

Summary The distribution of the neuropeptide substance P, which is considered to be a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator of the central nervous system, has been studied in the cutaneous electroreceptor organs (tuberous and ampullary organs) of 3 species of gymnotid fish: Apteronotus leptorhynchus, Eigenmannia virescens and Sternopygus sp. Immunohistochemical data have revealed that substance P is never present in the afferent fibers but is specifically localized in the electroreceptors of the three species examined. Substane P immunoreactivity is strictly localized in the sensory cells of the ampullary organs of all three species and in those of the tuberous organs of Apteronotus leptorhynchus and Sternopygus sp. In contrast, weak substance P immunoreactivity was observed only in certain tuberous sensory cells of Eigenmannia. Substance P immunoreactivity was also found in the accessory cells of certain organs: it was detected in the two types of accessory cells of the tuberous organs of Eigemmannia virescens, in the accessory cells type 2 of the tuberous organs of Sternopygus sp., and in all accessory cells of ampullary organs of Sternopygus sp. and Apteronotus leptorhynchus. In Sternopygus sp., positive staining was only evident if the substance P antibody was used at low concentration. Immunoreactivity for substance P in the sensory cells suggests that it has a transmitter or modulator function in these electroreceptors; the presence of substance P in the accessory cells remains to be explained.     

Prey detection mechanism of elasmobranchs

Elasmobranchs can detect a little amount of electric fields and they have characteristic approach strategies to find an electric dipole source generated by prey or conspecifics. They appear to align the body at a constant angle with the current flow line of the electric field while swimming towards prey. However, it has not been studied how they process the perception of electric fields for the approach behaviour or what kind of neural mechanism is used. We use a model of electrosensory perception with electrodynamics and explore a possible approach mechanism based on the sensory landscape distributed on electroreceptors. This paper presents that elasmobranchs can estimate the direction of the electric field by swaying their head, which will be a basis information for their particular approach behaviour. A velocity profile of voltage gradients and intensity difference among the ampullary clusters can be another cues to detect a prey source.     

Responses of neurons in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the weakly electric fish <Emphasis Type="Italic">Gnathonemus petersii</Emphasis> to simple and complex electrosensory stimuli

Mormyrid fish use active electrolocation to detect and analyze objects. The electrosensory lateral line lobe in the brain receives input from electroreceptors and an efference copy of the command to discharge the electric organ. In curarized fish, we recorded extracellularly from neurons of the electrosensory lateral line lobe while stimulating in the periphery with either a local point stimulus or with a more natural whole-body stimulus. Two classes of neurons were found: (1) three types of E-cells, which were excited by a point stimulus; and (2) two types of I-cells, which were inhibited by point stimulus and responded with excitation to the electric organ corollary discharge. While all neurons responded to a point stimulus, only one out of two types of I-units and two of the three types of E-units changed their firing behavior to a whole-body stimulus or when an object was present. In most units, the responses to whole-body stimuli and to point stimuli differed substantially. Many electrosensory lateral line lobe units showed neural plasticity after prolonged sensory stimulation. However, plastic effects during whole body stimulation were often unlike those occurring during point stimuli, suggesting that under natural conditions electrosensory lateral line lobe network effects play an important role in shaping neural plasticity.     

Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: behavior

Electrolocation behavior of Apteronotus leptorhynchus was studied by monitoring the animal's ability to maintain orientation to a variety of moving electrolocation targets. The primary goal of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of various types of electrical 'jamming signals' in disrupting electrolocation performance. 1. Two measures of electrolocation performance were used: The latency between the electrolocation target motion and the fish's following response, and the minimum distance separating the fish from the target during the target movement sequence. Latency increased and minimum fish-target distance decreased as target size was decreased, and when large diameter ceramic targets were used as control stimuli the fish were less able to avoid, and frequently collided with, these 'electrically transparent' objects. 2. Four types of jamming signals were used in attempts to mask the electrosensory input used for electrolocation. Broad-band noise and sinusoidal signals, different in frequency by a few Hz from the animal's personal electric organ discharge (DF stimuli), were used to jam the tuberous electroreceptors. Five Hz and 50 Hz sinusoidal signals were used to jam the low-frequency or ampullary receptor system. Both the noise and the DF stimuli were effective in reducing electrolocation performance, and the threshold intensity for behavior deterioration was about three-fold lower for DF stimuli as compared to the noise. The rate of change of response deterioration as a function of increasing jamming intensity was, however, not different for these two types of stimuli. Neither the 50 Hz nor the 5 Hz jamming signals caused electrolocation deterioration when presented alone. However, 5 Hz jamming, when added to either the noise or DF jamming, did result in significant increments in response deterioration. This suggests that the ampullary receptors can provide supplementary information for electrolocation. 3. Electrolocation performance deterioration was also studied with various difference frequencies between an animal's EOD and the sinusoidal jamming stimulus. Increasing DF results in decreased electrolocation deterioration, but even at the highest DF frequencies used (128 Hz) significant response degradation was observed. 4. The apparent differences in the effectiveness of noise and DF stimulation in reducing electrolocation performance are largely accounted for by the differential effects of the tuberous electroreceptor filter characteristics on these two types of signals.     

Spike-interval triggered averaging reveals a quasi-periodic spiking alternative for stochastic resonance in catfish electroreceptors

Catfish detect and identify invisible prey by sensing their ultra-weak electric fields with electroreceptors. Any neuron that deals with small-amplitude input has to overcome sensitivity limitations arising from inherent threshold non-linearities in spike-generation mechanisms. Many sensory cells solve this issue with stochastic resonance, in which a moderate amount of intrinsic noise causes irregular spontaneous spiking activity with a probability that is modulated by the input signal. Here we show that catfish electroreceptors have adopted a fundamentally different strategy. Using a reverse correlation technique in which we take spike interval durations into account, we show that the electroreceptors generate a supra-threshold bias current that results in quasi-periodically produced spikes. In this regime stimuli modulate the interval between successive spikes rather than the instantaneous probability for a spike. This alternative for stochastic resonance combines threshold-free sensitivity for weak stimuli with similar sensitivity for excitations and inhibitions based on single interspike intervals.     

Developmental origin of shark electrosensory organs

Vertebrates have evolved electrosensory receptors that detect electrical stimuli on the surface of the skin and transmit them somatotopically to the brain. In chondrichthyans, the electrosensory system is composed of a cephalic network of ampullary organs, known as the ampullae of Lorenzini, that can detect extremely weak electric fields during hunting and navigation. Each ampullary organ consists of a gel-filled epidermal pit containing sensory hair cells, and synaptic connections with primary afferent neurons at the base of the pit that facilitate detection of voltage gradients over large regions of the body. The developmental origin of electroreceptors and the mechanisms that determine their spatial arrangement in the vertebrate head are not well understood. We have analyzed electroreceptor development in the lesser spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) and show that Sox8 and HNK1, two markers of the neural crest lineage, selectively mark sensory cells in ampullary organs. This represents the first evidence that the neural crest gives rise to electrosensory cells. We also show that pathfinding by cephalic mechanosensory and electrosensory axons follows the expression pattern of EphA4, a well-known guidance cue for axons and neural crest cells in osteichthyans. Expression of EphrinB2, which encodes a ligand for EphA4, marks the positions at which ampullary placodes are initiated in the epidermis, and EphA4 is expressed in surrounding mesenchyme. These results suggest that Eph-Ephrin signaling may establish an early molecular map for neural crest migration, axon guidance and placodal morphogenesis during development of the shark electrosensory system.     

On the electrodetection threshold of aquatic vertebrates with ampullary or mucous gland electroreceptor organs

Reinterpretation of research on the electric sense in aquatic organisms with ampullary organs results in the following conclusions. The detection limit of limnic vertebrates with ampullary organs is 1 microV cm(-1), and of marine fish is 20 nV cm(-1). Angular movements are essential for stimulation of the ampullary system in uniform d.c. fields. Angular movements in the geomagnetic field also generate induction voltages, which exceed the 20 nV cm(-1) limit in marine fish. As a result, marine electrosensitive fish are sensitive to motion in the geomagnetic field, whereas limnic fish are not. Angular swimming movements generate a.c. stimuli, which act like the noise in a stochastic resonance system, and result in a detection threshold in marine organisms as low as 1 nV cm(-1). Fish in the benthic space are exposed to stronger electric stimuli than fish in the pelagic space. Benthic fish scan the orientation plane for the maximum potential difference with their raster of electroreceptor organs, in order to locate bioelectric prey. This behaviour explains why the detection threshold does not depend on fish size. Pelagic marine fish are mainly exposed to electric fields caused by movements in the geomagnetic field. The straight orientation courses found in certain shark species might indicate that the electric sense functions as a simple bisensor system. Symmetrical stimulation of the sensory raster would provide an easy way to keep a straight course with respect to a far-field stimulus. The same neural mechanism would be effective in the location of a bioelectric prey generating a near-field stimulus. The response criteria in conditioning experiments and in experiments with spontaneous reactions are discussed.     

A hormone-sensitive communication system in an electric fish

The electric communication system includes both special muscle-derived cells or electrocytes that produce species-typical electric signals, or electric organ discharges (EODs), and specialized sensory receptors, or electroreceptors, that encode the electric fields set up by EODs. Steroid hormones can influence the characteristic properties of both EODs and electroreceptors. Steroids appear to directly effect the anatomy and physiology of the electrocytes that generate an EOD. In contrast, the steroid effect on electroreceptors may be predominantly via an indirect mechanism whereby changes in the spectral characteristics of the EOD appear to induce changes in the spectral sensitivity of electroreceptors. Continued studies of electrosensory and electromotor systems will offer insights into the cellular bases for the development and evolution of steroid-sensitive pathways in the vertebrate nervous system.     

Electroreceptor model of the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. I. The model and the origin of differences between A- and B-receptors.

We present an electroreceptor model of the A- and B-receptors of the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. The model consists of a sensory cell, whose membrane is separated into an apical and basal portions by support cells, and an afferent fiber. The apical membrane of the cell contains only leak channels, while the basal membrane contains voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels, voltage-sensitive and Ca2+-activated K+ channels, and leak channels. The afferent fiber is described with the modified Hodgkin-Huxley equation, in which the voltage-sensitive gate of the K+ channels is a dynamic variable. In our model we suggest that the electroreceptors detect and process the information provided by an electric organ discharge (EOD) as follows: the current caused by an EOD stimulus depolarizes the basal membrane to a greatly depolarized state. Then the release of transmitter excites the afferent fiber to oscillate after a certain time interval. Due to the resistance-capacitance structure of the cells, they not only perceive the EOD intensity, but also sense the variation of the EOD waveform, which can be strongly distorted by the capacitive component of an object. Because of the different morphologies of A- and B-cells, as well as the different conductance of leak ion channels in the apical membrane and the different capacitance of A- and B-cells, A-receptors mainly respond to the EOD intensity, while B-receptors are sensitive to the variation of EOD waveform.