The U1 snRNP-associated factor Luc7p affects 5' splice site selection in yeast and human

yLuc7p is an essential subunit of the yeast U1 snRNP and contains two putative zinc fingers. Using RNA–protein cross-linking and directed site-specific proteolysis (DSSP), we have established that the N-terminal zinc finger of yLuc7p contacts the pre-mRNA in the 5′ exon in a region close to the cap. Modifying the pre-mRNA sequence in the region contacted by yLuc7p affects splicing in a yLuc7p-dependent manner indicating that yLuc7p stabilizes U1 snRNP–pre-mRNA interaction, thus reminding of the mode of action of another U1 snRNP component, Nam8p. Database searches identified three putative human yLuc7p homologs (hLuc7A, hLuc7B1 and hLuc7B2). These proteins have an extended C-terminal tail rich in RS and RE residues, a feature characteristic of splicing factors. Consistent with a role in pre-mRNA splicing, hLuc7A localizes in the nucleus and antibodies raised against hLuc7A specifically co-precipitate U1 snRNA from human cell extracts. Interestingly, hLuc7A overexpression affects splicing of a reporter in vivo. Taken together, our data suggest that the formation of a wide network of protein–RNA interactions around the 5′ splice site by U1 snRNP-associated factors contributes to alternative splicing regulation.     

Splicing of branchpoint-distant exons is promoted by Cactin,Tls1 and the ubiquitin-fold-activated Sde2

Intron diversity facilitates regulated gene expression and alternative splicing. Spliceosomes excise introns after recognizing their splicing signals: the 5′-splice site (5′ss), branchpoint (BP) and 3′-splice site (3′ss). The latter two signals are recognized by U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) and its accessory factors (U2AFs), but longer spacings between them result in weaker splicing. Here, we show that excision of introns with a BP-distant 3′ss (e.g. rap1 intron 2) requires the ubiquitin-fold-activated splicing regulator Sde2 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. By monitoring splicing-specific ura4 reporters in a collection of S. pombe mutants, Cay1 and Tls1 were identified as additional regulators of this process. The role of Sde2, Cay1 and Tls1 was further confirmed by increasing BP–3′ss spacings in a canonical tho5 intron. We also examined BP-distant exons spliced independently of these factors and observed that RNA secondary structures possibly bridged the gap between the two signals. These proteins may guide the 3′ss towards the spliceosome''s catalytic centre by folding the RNA between the BP and 3′ss. Orthologues of Sde2, Cay1 and Tls1, although missing in the intron-poor Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are present in intron-rich eukaryotes, including humans. This type of intron-specific pre-mRNA splicing appears to have evolved for regulated gene expression and alternative splicing of key heterochromatin factors.     

Group VIA Phospholipase A2 (iPLA2β) Modulates Bcl-x 5′-Splice Site Selection and Suppresses Anti-apoptotic Bcl-x(L) in β-Cells

Diabetes is a consequence of reduced β-cell function and mass, due to β-cell apoptosis. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is induced during β-cell apoptosis due to various stimuli, and our work indicates that group VIA phospholipase A₂β (iPLA₂β) participates in this process. Delineation of underlying mechanism(s) reveals that ER stress reduces the anti-apoptotic Bcl-x(L) protein in INS-1 cells. The Bcl-x pre-mRNA undergoes alternative pre-mRNA splicing to generate Bcl-x(L) or Bcl-x(S) mature mRNA. We show that both thapsigargin-induced and spontaneous ER stress are associated with reductions in the ratio of Bcl-x(L)/Bcl-x(S) mRNA in INS-1 and islet β-cells. However, chemical inactivation or knockdown of iPLA₂β augments the Bcl-x(L)/Bcl-x(S) ratio. Furthermore, the ratio is lower in islets from islet-specific RIP-iPLA₂β transgenic mice, whereas islets from global iPLA₂β^−/− mice exhibit the opposite phenotype. In view of our earlier reports that iPLA₂β induces ceramide accumulation through neutral sphingomyelinase 2 and that ceramides shift the Bcl-x 5′-splice site (5′SS) selection in favor of Bcl-x(S), we investigated the potential link between Bcl-x splicing and the iPLA₂β/ceramide axis. Exogenous C₆-ceramide did not alter Bcl-x 5′SS selection in INS-1 cells, and neutral sphingomyelinase 2 inactivation only partially prevented the ER stress-induced shift in Bcl-x splicing. In contrast, 5(S)-hydroxytetraenoic acid augmented the ratio of Bcl-x(L)/Bcl-x(S) by 15.5-fold. Taken together, these data indicate that β-cell apoptosis is, in part, attributable to the modulation of 5′SS selection in the Bcl-x pre-mRNA by bioactive lipids modulated by iPLA₂β.     

Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein K Represses the Production of Pro-apoptotic Bcl-xS Splice Isoform

The Bcl-x pre-mRNA is alternatively spliced to produce the anti-apoptotic Bcl-x_L and the pro-apoptotic Bcl-x_S isoforms. By performing deletion mutagenesis on a human Bcl-x minigene, we have identified a novel exonic element that controls the use of the 5′ splice site of Bcl-x_S. The proximal portion of this element acts as a repressor and is located downstream of an enhancer. Further mutational analysis provided a detailed topological map of the regulatory activities revealing a sharp transition between enhancer and repressor sequences. Portions of the enhancer can function when transplanted in another alternative splicing unit. Chromatography and immunoprecipitation assays indicate that the silencer element interacts with heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein particle (hnRNP) K, consistent with the presence of putative high affinity sites for this protein. Finally, down-regulation of hnRNP K by RNA interference enhanced splicing to Bcl-x_S, an effect seen only when the sequences bound by hnRNP K are present. Our results therefore document a clear role for hnRNP K in preventing the production of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-x_S splice isoform.Alternative splicing is a major mechanism used to augment the number of proteins encoded by the genome. It is estimated that as many as 97% of multiple exon pre-mRNAs undergo alternative splicing (1, 2). Disruption of alternative splicing by mutating important regulatory sequences or by altering the expression or activity of proteins controlling splice site selection has been linked with different diseases, including cancer (3–7). Apoptosis is an important and complex cellular program involved in development and differentiation in higher organisms (8, 9). However, its aberrant control often contributes to cancer development and the resistance of cancer cells to drug therapy (10–13).Genes implicated in the apoptotic pathway are alternatively spliced often to produce protein isoforms with distinct or even antagonistic activities (14, 15). A good example is the apoptotic regulator Bcl-x, which is alternatively spliced to produce two major isoforms, the anti-apoptotic Bcl-x_L protein and the shorter pro-apoptotic Bcl-x_S isoform (16). This alternative splicing decision involves a competition between two 5′ splice sites; the use of the downstream site creates Bcl-x_L, and the use of the upstream one produces Bcl-x_S (Fig. 1A). Bcl-x_L is always the predominant form in cancer cells, and overexpressing it can confer resistance to chemotherapeutic agents (17–22). On the other hand, overexpression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-x_S isoform enhances sensitivity to the topoisomerase inhibitor etoposide and to taxol in a breast cancer cell line, while triggering apoptosis in melanoma cell lines (23, 24). Using antisense technologies to improve the production of the Bcl-x_S splice variant can also induce apoptosis in cancer cells (25–27).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.A, alternative splicing of Bcl-x produces two major isoforms, Bcl-x_L and Bcl-x_S. B, regulation of Bcl-x alternative splicing. The enhancer elements are shown as white boxes, and the repressors are black. The pointed and flat arrows indicate positive and negative regulation, respectively. Protein kinase C inhibition relieves repression caused by the SB1 element on the Bcl-x_S splice site (36). The repressor elements CRCE1, recognized by SAP155, and CRCE2 mediate the production of Bcl-x_S by ceramide as when induced by gemcitabine in A549 cells (38, 39). hnRNP F/H binds to the B2G element to enhance the production of the Bcl-x_S isoform (41). RBM25, through an element located upstream of the Bcl-x_S splice site, can also augment its use (44). A large intronic region (IRE) mediates the Bcl-x_L increase caused by interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) (35). Finally, the B3 region also enhances Bcl-x_L formation through the binding of SRp30c to AM2 and ML2 and the U1 snRNP to two cryptic 5′ splice sites (42).Alternative splicing is regulated by different proteins bound to sequence elements near splice sites. A variety of mechanisms is used to achieve regulation. Some splicing factors act by recruiting or inhibiting the binding of different components of the spliceosome. Others may change the conformation of the pre-mRNA to mask a splice site or to bring a pair of splice sites into closer proximity (28, 29).Although individual factors can have a strong and specific effect on splicing decisions, alternative splicing often relies on a combination of factors to determine the appropriate levels of isoforms. The implication of multiple proteins likely provides additional levels of regulation that helps attuned splicing control to a variety of stresses, environmental cues, and growth conditions. In several cases, the interaction of regulatory factors can be antagonistic. For example, in the Drosophila male-specific-lethal-2 (msl-2) pre-mRNA, recruitment of SXL to a uridine-rich region interferes with the binding of TIA-1 that is necessary for efficient U1 snRNP² recruitment at the 5′ splice site (30). On the same pre-mRNA, SXL also diminishes U2AF recognition of the polypyrimidine tract at the 3′ splice site. TIA proteins bound to a U-rich element on the avian myosin phosphatase targeting subunit-1 (MYPT1) pre-mRNA repress the binding of PTB (31). PTB can also reduce the recruitment of ETR-3 to intronic elements near exon 5 of cardiac troponin T (32). In neurons, the binding of PTB to the introns surrounding the N1 exon of c-src is antagonized by nPTB protein, promoting exon inclusion. On the hnRNP A1 pre-mRNA, PTB diminishes the binding of SRp30c to the intronic CE9 element, reducing the inhibition by this protein on the use of the downstream 3′ splice site (33). SC35 and hnRNP A1 have partially overlapping binding sites on the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) tat exon 2. Preferential binding of SC35 enhances the inclusion of the exon, whereas hnRNP A1, by reducing SC35 binding, increases exclusion (34). Thus, the competition provided by an overlapping or a closely abutting pair of enhancer/ silencer represents a simple and frequent mechanism of splicing control.The regulation of Bcl-x alternative splicing has received some attention in recent years leading to the discovery of several cis-acting elements and a few trans-acting control factors (Fig. 1B). Intronic regions downstream from the Bcl-x_L 5′ splice site have been implicated as mediating signals from cytokines such as interleukin-6 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (35). In addition, we have reported that an element located 187 nt upstream of the Bcl-x_S splice site mediates a protein kinase C-dependent signal that represses splicing to the Bcl-x_S donor site (36). On the other hand, ceramide enhances the use of the Bcl-x_S 5′ splice site by lifting the repression mediated by two other elements (37, 38). The activity of one of these apparently involves SAP155 (39). The RNA-binding protein Sam68, under the control of the tyrosine kinase Fyn, can also increase the production of Bcl-x_S in cooperation with hnRNP A1 (40), and this effect is inhibited by overexpression of ASF/SF2. The Bcl-x sequences bound by the above factors remain to be identified. We also uncovered enhancer elements for Bcl-x_S and Bcl-x_L. hnRNP F and H bind downstream of the Bcl-x_S 5′ splice site to stimulate splicing to that site (41). Enhancement of Bcl-x_L is conferred by SRp30c, which binds upstream of the 5′ splice site to antagonize the repressor activity of pseudo 5′ splice sites (42). Recently, the SR protein SC35 was shown to increase the production of Bcl-x_S (43). Finally, the binding of RBM25 to a sequence element upstream of the Bcl-x_S 5′ splice site stimulated its use, possibly by recruiting U1 snRNP through its interaction with the U1-associated protein hLuc7A (44). Thus, the region located between the two competing 5′ splice sites of Bcl-x is densely populated by splicing control elements.In this study, we have pursued our characterization of Bcl-x splicing control by examining the contribution of sequences directly upstream of the Bcl-x_S donor site. Our mutational approach identified a region containing flanking enhancer and silencer activities. The activity of the repressor portion is mediated by hnRNP K, which makes this protein an anti-apoptotic regulator.     

Aberrant 5' splice sites in human disease genes: mutation pattern, nucleotide structure and comparison of computational tools that predict their utilization

Despite a growing number of splicing mutations found in hereditary diseases, utilization of aberrant splice sites and their effects on gene expression remain challenging to predict. We compiled sequences of 346 aberrant 5′splice sites (5′ss) that were activated by mutations in 166 human disease genes. Mutations within the 5′ss consensus accounted for 254 cryptic 5′ss and mutations elsewhere activated 92 de novo 5′ss. Point mutations leading to cryptic 5′ss activation were most common in the first intron nucleotide, followed by the fifth nucleotide. Substitutions at position +5 were exclusively G>A transitions, which was largely attributable to high mutability rates of C/G>T/A. However, the frequency of point mutations at position +5 was significantly higher than that observed in the Human Gene Mutation Database, suggesting that alterations of this position are particularly prone to aberrant splicing, possibly due to a requirement for sequential interactions with U1 and U6 snRNAs. Cryptic 5′ss were best predicted by computational algorithms that accommodate nucleotide dependencies and not by weight-matrix models. Discrimination of intronic 5′ss from their authentic counterparts was less effective than for exonic sites, as the former were intrinsically stronger than the latter. Computational prediction of exonic de novo 5′ss was poor, suggesting that their activation critically depends on exonic splicing enhancers or silencers. The authentic counterparts of aberrant 5′ss were significantly weaker than the average human 5′ss. The development of an online database of aberrant 5′ss will be useful for studying basic mechanisms of splice-site selection, identifying splicing mutations and optimizing splice-site prediction algorithms.     

A Novel Intra-U1 snRNP Cross-Regulation Mechanism: Alternative Splicing Switch Links U1C and U1-70K Expression

The U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP)-specific U1C protein participates in 5′ splice site recognition and regulation of pre-mRNA splicing. Based on an RNA-Seq analysis in HeLa cells after U1C knockdown, we found a conserved, intra-U1 snRNP cross-regulation that links U1C and U1-70K expression through alternative splicing and U1 snRNP assembly. To investigate the underlying regulatory mechanism, we combined mutational minigene analysis, in vivo splice-site blocking by antisense morpholinos, and in vitro binding experiments. Alternative splicing of U1-70K pre-mRNA creates the normal (exons 7–8) and a non-productive mRNA isoform, whose balance is determined by U1C protein levels. The non-productive isoform is generated through a U1C-dependent alternative 3′ splice site, which requires an adjacent cluster of regulatory 5′ splice sites and binding of intact U1 snRNPs. As a result of nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) of the non-productive isoform, U1-70K mRNA and protein levels are down-regulated, and U1C incorporation into the U1 snRNP is impaired. U1-70K/U1C-deficient particles are assembled, shifting the alternative splicing balance back towards productive U1-70K splicing, and restoring assembly of intact U1 snRNPs. Taken together, we established a novel feedback regulation that controls U1-70K/U1C homeostasis and ensures correct U1 snRNP assembly and function.     

Insights into the selective activation of alternatively used splice acceptors by the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 bidirectional splicing enhancer

The guanosine-adenosine-rich exonic splicing enhancer (GAR ESE) identified in exon 5 of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) pre-mRNA activates either an enhancer-dependent 5′ splice site (ss) or 3′ ss in 1-intron reporter constructs in the presence of the SR proteins SF2/ASF2 and SRp40. Characterizing the mode of action of the GAR ESE inside the internal HIV-1 exon 5 we found that this enhancer fulfils a dual splicing regulatory function (i) by synergistically mediating exon recognition through its individual SR protein-binding sites and (ii) by conferring 3′ ss selectivity within the 3′ ss cluster preceding exon 5. Both functions depend upon the GAR ESE, U1 snRNP binding at the downstream 5′ ss D4 and the E42 sequence located between these elements. Therefore, a network of cross-exon interactions appears to regulate splicing of the alternative exons 4a and 5. As the GAR ESE-mediated activation of the upstream 3′ ss cluster also is essential for the processing of intron-containing vpu/env-mRNAs during intermediate viral gene expression, the GAR enhancer substantially contributes to the regulation of viral replication.     

hnRNP H binding at the 5' splice site correlates with the pathological effect of two intronic mutations in the NF-1 and TSHbeta genes

We have recently reported a disease-causing substitution (+5G > C) at the donor site of NF-1 exon 3 that produces its skipping. We have now studied in detail the splicing mechanism involved in analyzing RNA–protein complexes at several 5′ splice sites. Characteristic protein patterns were observed by pulldown and band-shift/super-shift analysis. Here, we show that hnRNP H binds specifically to the wild-type GGGgu donor sequence of the NF-1 exon 3. Depletion analyses shows that this protein restricts the accessibility of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1snRNA) to the donor site. In this context, the +5G > C mutation abolishes both U1snRNP base pairing and the 5′ splice site (5′ss) function. However, exon recognition in the mutant can be rescued by disrupting the binding of hnRNP H, demonstrating that this protein enhances the effects of the +5G > C substitution. Significantly, a similar situation was found for a second disease-causing +5G > A substitution in the 5′ss of TSHβ exon 2, which harbors a GGgu donor sequence. Thus, the reason why similar nucleotide substitutions can be either neutral or very disruptive of splicing function can be explained by the presence of specific binding signatures depending on local contexts.     

Intron Definition and a Branch Site Adenosine at nt 385 Control RNA Splicing of HPV16 E6*I and E7 Expression

HPV16 E6 and E7, two viral oncogenes, are expressed from a single bicistronic pre-mRNA. In this report, we provide the evidence that the bicistronic pre-mRNA intron 1 contains three 5′ splice sites (5′ ss) and three 3′ splice sites (3′ ss) normally used in HPV16⁺ cervical cancer and its derived cell lines. The choice of two novel alternative 5′ ss (nt 221 5′ ss and nt 191 5′ ss) produces two novel isoforms of E6E7 mRNAs (E6*V and E6*VI). The nt 226 5′ ss and nt 409 3′ ss is preferentially selected over the other splice sites crossing over the intron to excise a minimal length of the intron in RNA splicing. We identified AACAAAC as the preferred branch point sequence (BPS) and an adenosine at nt 385 (underlined) in the BPS as a branch site to dictate the selection of the nt 409 3′ ss for E6*I splicing and E7 expression. Introduction of point mutations into the mapped BPS led to reduced U2 binding to the BPS and thereby inhibition of the second step of E6E7 splicing at the nt 409 3′ ss. Importantly, the E6E7 bicistronic RNA with a mutant BPS and inefficient splicing makes little or no E7 and the resulted E6 with mutations of ⁹¹QYNK⁹⁴ to ⁹¹PSFW⁹⁴ displays attenuate activity on p53 degradation. Together, our data provide structural basis of the E6E7 intron 1 for better understanding of how viral E6 and E7 expression is regulated by alternative RNA splicing. This study elucidates for the first time a mapped branch point in HPV16 genome involved in viral oncogene expression.     

RBM10 regulates alternative splicing

RBM10, originally called S1-1, is a nuclear RNA-binding protein with domains characteristic of RNA processing proteins. It has been reported that RBM10 constitutes spliceosome complexes and that RBM5, a close homologue of RBM10, regulates alternative splicing of apoptosis-related genes, Fas and cFLIP. In this study, we examined whether RBM10 has a regulatory function in splicing similar to RBM5, and determined that it indeed regulates alternative splicing of Fas and Bcl-x genes. RBM10 promotes exon skipping of Fas pre-mRNA as well as selection of an internal 5′-splice site in Bcl-x pre-mRNA. We propose a consensus RBM10-binding sequence at 5′-splice sites of target exons and a mechanistic model of RBM10 action in the alternative splicing.     

Tra2-Mediated Recognition of HIV-1 5′ Splice Site D3 as a Key Factor in the Processing of vpr mRNA

Small noncoding HIV-1 leader exon 3 is defined by its splice sites A2 and D3. While 3′ splice site (3′ss) A2 needs to be activated for vpr mRNA formation, the location of the vpr start codon within downstream intron 3 requires silencing of splicing at 5′ss D3. Here we show that the inclusion of both HIV-1 exon 3 and vpr mRNA processing is promoted by an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE_vpr) localized between exonic splicing silencer ESSV and 5′ss D3. The ESE_vpr sequence was found to be bound by members of the Transformer 2 (Tra2) protein family. Coexpression of these proteins in provirus-transfected cells led to an increase in the levels of exon 3 inclusion, confirming that they act through ESE_vpr. Further analyses revealed that ESE_vpr supports the binding of U1 snRNA at 5′ss D3, allowing bridging interactions across the upstream exon with 3′ss A2. In line with this, an increase or decrease in the complementarity of 5′ss D3 to the 5′ end of U1 snRNA was accompanied by a higher or lower vpr expression level. Activation of 3′ss A2 through the proposed bridging interactions, however, was not dependent on the splicing competence of 5′ss D3 because rendering it splicing defective but still competent for efficient U1 snRNA binding maintained the enhancing function of D3. Therefore, we propose that splicing at 3′ss A2 occurs temporally between the binding of U1 snRNA and splicing at D3.     

Limited complementarity between U1 snRNA and a retroviral 5′ splice site permits its attenuation via RNA secondary structure

Multiple types of regulation are used by cells and viruses to control alternative splicing. In murine leukemia virus, accessibility of the 5′ splice site (ss) is regulated by an upstream region, which can fold into a complex RNA stem–loop structure. The underlying sequence of the structure itself is negligible, since most of it could be functionally replaced by a simple heterologous RNA stem–loop preserving the wild-type splicing pattern. Increasing the RNA duplex formation between U1 snRNA and the 5′ss by a compensatory mutation in position +6 led to enhanced splicing. Interestingly, this mutation affects splicing only in the context of the secondary structure, arguing for a dynamic interplay between structure and primary 5′ss sequence. The reduced 5′ss accessibility could also be counteracted by recruiting a splicing enhancer domain via a modified MS2 phage coat protein to a single binding site at the tip of the simple RNA stem–loop. The mechanism of 5′ss attenuation was revealed using hyperstable U1 snRNA mutants, showing that restricted U1 snRNP access is the cause of retroviral alternative splicing.     

Prp40 pre-mRNA processing factor 40 homolog B (PRPF40B) associates with SF1 and U2AF65 and modulates alternative pre-mRNA splicing in vivo

The first stable complex formed during the assembly of spliceosomes onto pre-mRNA substrates in mammals includes U1 snRNP, which recognizes the 5′ splice site, and the splicing factors SF1 and U2AF, which bind the branch point sequence, polypyrimidine tract, and 3′ splice site. The 5′ and 3′ splice site complexes are thought to be joined together by protein–protein interactions mediated by factors that ensure the fidelity of the initial splice site recognition. In this study, we identified and characterized PRPF40B, a putative mammalian ortholog of the U1 snRNP-associated yeast splicing factor Prp40. PRPF40B is highly enriched in speckles with a behavior similar to splicing factors. We demonstrated that PRPF40B interacts directly with SF1 and associates with U2AF⁶⁵. Accordingly, PRPF40B colocalizes with these splicing factors in the cell nucleus. Splicing assays with reporter minigenes revealed that PRPF40B modulates alternative splice site selection. In the case of Fas regulation of alternative splicing, weak 5′ and 3′ splice sites and exonic sequences are required for PRPF40B function. Placing our data in a functional context, we also show that PRPF40B depletion increased Fas/CD95 receptor number and cell apoptosis, which suggests the ability of PRPF40B to alter the alternative splicing of key apoptotic genes to regulate cell survival.     

The Pre-mRNA 5′ Cap Determines Whether U6 Small Nuclear RNA Succeeds U1 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Particle at 5′ Splice Sites

Efficient splicing of the 5′-most intron of pre-mRNA requires a 5′ m⁷G(5′)ppp(5′)N cap, which has been implicated in U1 snRNP binding to 5′ splice sites. We demonstrate that the cap alters the kinetic profile of U1 snRNP binding, but its major effect is on U6 snRNA binding. With two alternative wild-type splice sites in an adenovirus pre-mRNA, the cap selectively alters U1 snRNA binding at the site to which cap-independent U1 snRNP binding is stronger and that is used predominantly in splicing; with two consensus sites, the cap acts on both, even though one is substantially preferred for splicing. However, the most striking quantitative effect of the 5′ cap is neither on U1 snRNP binding nor on the assembly of large complexes but on the replacement of U1 snRNP by U6 snRNA at the 5′ splice site. Inhibition of splicing by a cap analogue is correlated with the loss of U6 interactions at the 5′ splice site and not with any loss of U1 snRNP binding.