Release factor competition is equivalent at strong and weakly suppressed nonsense codons

Summary We have compared the competition between strong or weak suppressor tRNAs and translational release factors (RF) at nonsense codons in the lacI gene of Escherichia coli. Using the F'lacIZ fusions developed by Miller and coworkers, UAG, UAA, and UGA codons at positions 189 and 220 were efficiently suppressed by plasmid-borne tRNAtrp suppressors cognate to each nonsense triplet. Introduction of a compatible RF 1 plasmid competed at UAG and UAA but not UGA codons. An RF2 expressing plasmid competed at UAA and UGA but had little effect at UAG. Release factor competition against weak suppressors was measured using combinations of noncognate suppressors and nonsense codons. In each case, release factor plasmids behaved identically towards poorly suppressed codons as they did when the same codons were efficiently suppressed. The implications for these studies on the role of release factors in nonsense suppression context effects are discussed.     

Mutations to nonsense codons in human genetic disease: implications for gene therapy by nonsense suppressor tRNAs.

Nonsense suppressor tRNAs have been suggested as potential agents for human somatic gene therapy. Recent work from this laboratory has described significant effects of 3' codon context on the efficiency of human nonsense suppressors. A rapid increase in the number of reports of human diseases caused by nonsense codons, prompted us to determine how the spectrum of mutation to either UAG, UAA or UGA codons and their respective 3' contexts, might effect the efficiency of human suppressor tRNAs employed for purposes of gene therapy. This paper presents a survey of 179 events of mutations to nonsense codons which cause human germline or somatic disease. The analysis revealed a ratio of approximately 1:2:3 for mutation to UAA, UAG and UGA respectively. This pattern is similar, but not identical, to that of naturally occurring stop codons. The 3' contexts of new mutations to stop were also analysed. Once again, the pattern was similar to the contexts surrounding natural termination signals. These results imply there will be little difference in the sensitivity of nonsense mutations and natural stop codons to suppression by nonsense suppressor tRNAs. Analysis of the codons altered by nonsense mutations suggests that efforts to design human UAG suppressor tRNAs charged with Trp, Gln, and Glu; UAA suppressors charged with Gln and Glu, and UGA suppressors which insert Arg, would be an essential step in the development of suppressor tRNAs as agents of human somatic gene therapy.     

Glutamine is incorporated at the nonsense codons UAG and UAA in a suppressor-free Escherichia coli strain

Readthrough of the nonsense codons UAG, UAA, and UGA is seen in Escherichia coli strains lacking tRNA suppressors. Earlier results indicate that UGA is miscoded by tRNA(Trp). It has also been shown that tRNA(Tyr) and tRNA(Gln) are involved in UAG and UAA decoding in several eukaryotic viruses as well as in yeast. Here we have investigated which amino acid(s) is inserted in response to the nonsense codons UAG and UAA in E. coli. To do this, the stop codon in question was introduced into the staphylococcal protein A gene. Protein A binds to IgG, which facilitates purification of the readthrough product. We have shown that the stop codons UAG and UAA direct insertion of glutamine, indicating that tRNA(Gln) can read the two codons. We have also confirmed that tryptophan is inserted in response to UGA, suggesting that it is read by tRNA(Trp).     

A temperature-sensitive mutant of Escherichia coli that shows enhanced misreading of UAG/A and increased efficiency for some tRNA nonsense suppressors

Summary A spontaneous mutant was isolated that harbors a weak suppressing activity towards a UAG mutation, together with an inability to grow at 43° C in rich medium. The mutation is shown to be associated with an increased misreading of UAG at certain codon contexts and UAA. UGA, missense or frameshift mutations do not appear to be misread to a similar extent. The mutation gives an increased efficiency to several amber tRNA suppressors with-out increasing their ambiguity towards UAA. The ochre suppressors SuB and Su5 are stimulated in their reading of both UAG and UAA with preference for UAG. An opal suppressor is not affected. The effect of the mutation on the efficiency of amber and ochre suppressors is dependent on the codon context of the nonsense codon.The mutated gene (uar) has been mapped and found to be recessive both with respect to suppressor-enhancing ability as well as for temperature sensitivity. The phenotype is partly suppressed by the ochre suppressor SuC. It is suggested that uar codes for a protein, which is involved in translational termination at UAG and UAA stop codons.     

Nonsense Suppression of the Major Rhodopsin Gene of Drosophila

We placed UAA, UAG and UGA nonsense mutations at two leucine codons, Leu205 and Leu309, in Drosophila's major rhodopsin gene, ninaE, by site-directed mutagenesis, and then created the corresponding mutants by P element-mediated transformation of a ninaE deficiency strain. In the absence of a genetic suppressor, flies harboring any of the nonsense mutations at the 309 site, but not the 205 site, show increased rhodopsin activity. Additionally, all flies with nonsense mutations at either site have better rhabdomere structure than does the ninaE deficiency strain. Construction and analysis of a 3'-deletion mutant of ninaE indicates that translational readthrough accounts for the extra photoreceptor activity of the ninaE309 alleles and that truncated opsins are responsible for the improved rhabdomere structure. The presence of leucine-inserting tRNA nonsense suppressors DtLa Su+ and DtLb Su+ in the mutant strains produced a small increase (less than 0.04%) in functional rhodopsin. The opal (UGA) suppressor derived from the DtLa tRNA gene is more efficient than the amber (UAG) or opal suppressor derived from the DtLb gene, and both DtLa and DtLb derived suppressors are more efficient at site 205 than 309.     

Effects of surrounding sequence on the suppression of nonsense codons

Using a lacI-Z fusion system, we have determined the efficiency of suppression of nonsense codons in the I gene of Escherichia coli by assaying beta-galactosidase activity. We examined the efficiency of four amber suppressors acting on 42 different amber (UAG) codons at known positions in the I gene, and the efficiency of a UAG suppressor at 14 different UGA codons. The largest effects were found with the amber suppressor supE (Su2), which displayed efficiencies that varied over a 35-fold range, and with the UGA suppressor, which displayed a 170-fold variation in efficiency. Certain UGA sites were so poorly suppressed (less than 0.2%) by the UGA suppressor that they were not originally detected as nonsense mutations. Suppression efficiency can be correlated with the sequence on the 3' side of the codon being suppressed, and in many cases with the first base on the 3' side. In general, codons followed by A or G are well suppressed, and codons followed by U or C are poorly suppressed. There are exceptions, however, since codons followed by CUG or CUC are well suppressed. Models explaining the effect of the surrounding sequence on suppression efficiency are considered in the Discussion and in the accompanying paper.     

Patterns of Genetic and Phenotypic Suppression of lys2 Mutations in the Yeast SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

A total of 358 lys2 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been characterized for suppressibility by the following suppressors: UAA and UAG suppressors that insert tyrosine, serine or leucine; a putative UGA suppressor; an omnipotent suppressor SUP46; and a frameshift suppressor SUF1–1. In addition, the lys2 mutants were examined for phenotypic suppression by the aminoglycoside antibiotic paromomycin, for osmotic remediability and for temperature sensitivity. The mutants exhibited over 50 different patterns of suppression and most of the nonsense mutants appeared similar to nonsense mutants previously described. A total of 24% were suppressible by one or more of the UAA suppressors, 4% were suppressible by one or more of the UAG suppressors, while only one was suppressible by the UGA suppressor and only one was weakly suppressible by the frameshift suppressor. One mutant responded to both UAA and UAG suppressors, indicating that UAA or UAG mutations at certain rare sites can be exceptions to the specific action of UAA and UAG suppressors. Some of the mutants appeared to require certain types of amino acid replacements at the mutant sites in order to produce a functional gene product, while others appeared to require suppressors that were expressed at high levels. Many of the mutants suppressible by SUP46 and paromomycin were not suppressible by any of the UAA, UAG or UGA suppressors, indicating that omnipotent suppression and phenotypic suppression need not be restricted to nonsense mutations. All of the mutants suppressible by SUP46 were also suppressible by paromomycin, suggesting a common mode of action of omnipotent suppression and phenotypic misreading.     

Mutation in the D arm enables a suppressor with a CUA anticodon to read both amber and ochre codons in Escherichia coli

Su9 of Escherichia coli differs from tRNATrp by only a G to A transition in the D arm, yet has an enhanced ability to translate UGA by an unusual C X A wobble pairing. In order to examine the effects of this mutation on translation of the complementary and wobble codons in vivo, we constructed the gene for an amber (UAG) suppressing variant of Su9, trpT179, by making the additional nucleotide change required for an amber suppressor anticodon. The resultant suppressor tRNA, Su79, is a very strong amber suppressor. Furthermore, the D arm mutation enables Su79 to suppress ochre (UAA) codons by C X A wobble pairing. These data demonstrate that the effect of the D arm mutation on wobble pairing is not restricted to a CCA anticodon. The effect extends to the CUA anticodon of Su79, thereby creating a new type of ochre suppressor. The new coding activity of Su79 cannot be explained by alterations in the level of aminoacylation, steady-state tRNA concentration, or nucleotide modification. The A24 mutation could permit unorthodox wobble pairings by generally enhancing tRNA efficiency at all codons or by altering codon specificity.     

Mutants of the elongation factor EF-Tu, a new class of nonsense suppressors

Read-through of nonsense codons has been studied in wild-type Escherichia coli cells and in cells harbouring mutant species of the elongation factor EF-Tu. The two phenomena differ essentially. Readthrough of UGA in wild-type cells is reduced by inactivation of tufB but is restored to the original level by introducing into the cell plasmid-borne EF-Tu. This shows that the natural UGA leakiness is dependent on the intracellular concentration of EF-Tu. Strains of E. coli harbouring mutant species of the elongation factor EF-Tu suppress the nonsense codons UAG, UAA and UGA. Suppression shows a codon context dependence. It requires the combined action of two different EF-Tu species: EF-TuAR(Ala 375----Thr) and EF-TuBo(Gly 222----Asp). Cells harbouring EF-TuAR(Ala 375----Thr) and wild-type EF-TuB, or wild-type EF-TuA and EF-TuBo(Gly 222----Asp) do not display suppressor activity. These data demonstrate that mutated tuf genes form an additional class of nonsense suppressors. The requirement for two different mutant EF-Tu species raises the question whether translation of sense codons also occurs by the combined action of two EF-Tu molecules on the ribosome.     

Construction, expression, and function of a new yeast amber suppressor, tRNATrpA

The number of different tRNA species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae known to be capable of suppressing termination of translation at UAG, UAA, and UGA codons is limited to those which insert tyrosine, leucine, and serine. Suppressor tRNAs that insert other amino acids, even those whose anticodons differ from the expected recognition sequences for nonsense codons by a single nucleotide, have never been identified via classical genetic analysis. We have used site-directed mutagenesis to convert the anticodon of a cloned tRNATrp gene from CCA to CTA with the expectation that this gene would produce tRNA molecules capable of interacting with the UAG terminator codon. We show that this form of the gene can be transcribed and spliced in vitro to produce mature tRNA with the expected base sequence. The putative suppressor gene has been introduced into several S. cerevisiae host strains using the centromere vector YCp19. Efficient suppression of amber mutations met8-1, tyr7-1, and lys2-801 results from the presence of the CTA form of tDNATrp. Two UAA mutants, leu2-1 and ade2-101, and the UGA marker his4-260 are not suppressed.     

Lack of peptide-release activity responding to codon UGA in Mycoplasma capricolum.

In Mycoplasma capricolum, a relative of Gram-positive eubacteria with a high genomic AT-content (75%), codon UGA is assigned to tryptophan instead of termination signal. Thus, in this bacterium the release factor 2 (RF-2), that recognizes UAA and UGA termination codons in eubacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, would be either specific to UAA or deleted. To test this, we have constructed a cell-free translation system using synthetic mRNA including codon UAA [mRNA(UAA)], UAG [mRNA(UAG)] and UGA [mRNA(UGA)] in-frame. In the absence of tryptophan, the translation of mRNA(UGA) ceased at UGA sites without appreciable release of the synthesized peptides from the ribosomes, whereas with mRNA(UAA) or mRNA(UAG) the bulk of the peptides was released. Upon addition of the E.coli S-100 fraction or B.subtilis S-100 fraction to the translation system, the synthesized peptides with mRNA(UGA) were almost completely released from the ribosomes, presumably because of the presence of RF-2 active to UGA in the added S-100 fraction. These data suggest that RF-2 is deleted or its activity to UGA is strongly weakened in M.capricolum.     

Aminoglycoside suppression at UAG, UAA and UGA codons in Escherichia coli and human tissue culture cells

Summary We have compared the suppression of nonsense mutations by aminoglycoside antibiotics inEscherichia coli and in human 293 cells. Six nonsense alleles of the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (cat) gene, in the vector pRSVcat, were suppressed by growth in G418 and paromomycin. Readthrough at UAG, UAA and UGA codons was monitored with enzyme assays for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT), in stably transformed bacteria and during transient expression from the same plasmid in human 293 tissue culture cells. We have found significant differences in the degree of suppression amongst three UAG codons and two UAA codons in different mRNA contexts. However, the pattern of these effects are not the same in the two organisms. Our data suggest that context effects of nonsense suppression may operate under different rules inE. coli and human cells.     

Neurospora crassa supersuppressor mutants are amber codon-specific

Neurospora crassa has 10 mapped supersuppressor (ssu) genes. In vivo studies indicate that they suppress amber (UAG) premature termination mutations but the spectrum of their functions remains to be elucidated. We examined seven ssu strains (ssu-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -9, and -10) using cell-free translation extracts. We tested suppression by requiring it to produce firefly luciferase from a reading frame containing premature UAA, UGA, or UAG terminators. All mutants except ssu-3 suppressed UAG codons. Maximal UAG suppression ranged from 15% to 30% relative to controls containing sense codons at the corresponding position. Production from constructs containing UAA or UGA was 1-2%, similar to levels observed with all nonsense codons in wild-type and ssu-3 extracts. UAG suppression was also seen using [35S]Met to radiolabel polypeptides. Suppression enabled ribosomes to continue translation elongation as determined using the toeprint assay. tRNA from supersuppressors showed suppressor activity when added to wild-type extracts. Thus, these supersuppressors produce amber suppressor tRNA.     

Evidence that the supE44 Mutation of Escherichia coli Is an Amber Suppressor Allele of glnX and that It Also Suppresses Ochre and Opal Nonsense Mutations

Translational readthrough of nonsense codons is seen not only in organisms possessing one or more tRNA suppressors but also in strains lacking suppressors. Amber suppressor tRNAs have been reported to suppress only amber nonsense mutations, unlike ochre suppressors, which can suppress both amber and ochre mutations, essentially due to wobble base pairing. In an Escherichia coli strain carrying the lacZU118 episome (an ochre mutation in the lacZ gene) and harboring the supE44 allele, suppression of the ochre mutation was observed after 7 days of incubation. The presence of the supE44 lesion in the relevant strains was confirmed by sequencing, and it was found to be in the duplicate copy of the glnV tRNA gene, glnX. To investigate this further, an in vivo luciferase assay developed by D. W. Schultz and M. Yarus (J. Bacteriol. 172:595-602, 1990) was employed to evaluate the efficiency of suppression of amber (UAG), ochre (UAA), and opal (UGA) mutations by supE44. We have shown here that supE44 suppresses ochre as well as opal nonsense mutations, with comparable efficiencies. The readthrough of nonsense mutations in a wild-type E. coli strain was much lower than that in a supE44 strain when measured by the luciferase assay. Increased suppression of nonsense mutations, especially ochre and opal, by supE44 was found to be growth phase dependent, as this phenomenon was only observed in stationary phase and not in logarithmic phase. These results have implications for the decoding accuracy of the translational machinery, particularly in stationary growth phase.Translation termination is mediated by one of the three stop codons (UAA, UAG, or UGA). When such stop codons arise in coding sequences due to mutations, referred to as nonsense mutations, they lead to abrupt arrest of the translation process. However, the termination efficiency of such nonsense codons is not 100%, as certain tRNAs have the ability to read these nonsense codons. Genetic code ambiguity is seen in several organisms. Stop codons have been shown to have alternate roles apart from translation termination. In organisms from all three domains of life, UGA encodes selenocysteine through a specialized mechanism. In Methanosarcinaceae, UAG encodes pyrrolysine (3). UAA and UAG are read as glutamine codons in some green algae and ciliates such as Tetrahymena and Diplomonads (24), and UAG alone encodes glutamine in Moloney murine leukemia virus (32). UGA encodes cysteine in Euplotes; tryptophan in some ciliates, Mycoplasma species, Spiroplasma citri, Bacillus, and tobacco rattle virus; and an unidentified amino acid in Pseudomicrothorax dubius and Nyctotherus ovalis (30). In certain cases the context of the stop codon in translational readthrough has been shown to play a role; for example, it has been reported that in vitro in tobacco mosaic virus, UAG and UAA are misread by tRNA^Tyr in a highly context-dependent manner (34, 9).Termination suppressors are of three types, i.e., amber, ochre, and opal suppressors, which are named based on their ability to suppress the three stop codons. Amber suppressors can suppress only amber codons, whereas ochre suppressors can suppress ochre codons (by normal base pairing) as well as amber codons (by wobbling) and opal suppressors can read opal and UGG tryptophan codon in certain cases. As described by Sambrook et al. (27), a few amber suppressors can also suppress ochre mutations by wobbling. The suppression efficiency varies among these suppressors, with amber suppressors generally showing increased efficiency over ochre and opal suppressors. supE44, an amber suppressor tRNA, is an allele of and is found in many commonly used strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Earlier studies have shown that supE44 is a weak amber suppressor and that its efficiency varies up to 35-fold depending on the reading context of the stop codon (8).Translational accuracy depends on several factors, which include charging of tRNAs with specific amino acids, mRNA decoding, and the presence of antibiotics such as streptomycin and mutations in ribosomal proteins which modulate the fidelity of the translational machinery. Among these, mRNA decoding errors have been reported to occur at a frequency ranging from about 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ per codon. Translational misreading errors also largely depend on the competition between cognate and near-cognate tRNA species. Poor availability of cognate tRNAs increases misreading (18).Several studies with E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown the readthrough of nonsense codons in suppressor-free cells. In a suppressor-free E. coli strain, it has been shown in vitro that glutamine is incorporated at the nonsense codons UAG and UAA (26). It has been reported that overexpression of wild-type tRNA^Gln in yeast suppresses amber as well as ochre mutations (25). In this study, we have confirmed the presence of an amber suppressor mutation in the glnX gene in a supE44 strain by sequence analysis. This was done essentially because we observed that supE44 could also suppress lacZ ochre mutations, albeit inefficiently. On further investigation using an in vivo luciferase reporter assay system for tRNA-mediated nonsense suppression (28), we found that the efficiency of suppression of amber lesion by supE44 is significantly higher than that reported previously in the literature. An increased ability to suppress ochre and opal nonsense mutations was observed in cells bearing supE44 compared to in the wild type. Such an effect was observed only in the stationary phase and was abolished in logarithmic phase.     

Construction and testing of a bacterial luciferase reporter gene system forin Vivo measurement of nonsense suppression inStreptomyces

A reporter gene system, based on luciferase genes from Vibrio harvei, was constructed for measurement of translation nonsense suppression in Streptomyces. Using the site-directed mutagenesis the TCA codon in position 13 of the luxB gene was replaced by all of the three stop codons individually. By cloning of luxA and luxB genes under the control of strong constitutive Streptomyces promoter ermE* in plasmid pUWL201 we created Wluxl with the wild-type sequence and pWlux2, pWlux3 and pWlux4 plasmids containing TGA-, TAG- and TAA-stop codons, respectively. Streptomyces lividans TK 24 was transformed with the plasmids and the reporter system was tested by growth of the strain in the presence of streptomycin as a translation accuracy modulator. Streptomycin increased nonsense suppression on UAA nearly 10-fold and more than 20-fold on UAG. On the other hand, UGA, the most frequent stop signal in Streptomyces, the effect was negligible.     

Procedure for Identifying Nonsense Mutations

A method has been devised for the rapid identification of nonsense mutations (UAG, UAA, UGA codons) in Salmonella. The mutations to be tested are reverted, and the revertants are replica-printed onto lactose plates spread with lawns of tester strains. These tester strains contain F' lac episomes with nonsense mutations in the episomal Z gene. The revertants are infected with the episome from the tester strain lawn. Because S. typhimurium is unable to ferment lactose, only those revertants which have nonsense suppressors are able to grow on lactose. If colonies appear on the lactose plate, it may be concluded that the original strain carries a nonsense mutation, since nonsense suppressors suppress the mutant phenotype.     

Analysis of specific misreading in Escherichia coli

The pattern of specific misreading by nonsense suppressors has been investigated using nonsense mutants in the rIIB gene of phage T4 and in the lacZ gene of Escherichia coli. It is shown that a su⁺ transfer RNA which reads UAG also misreads UAA but not UGA, a su⁺ tRNA which reads UAA (while it also reads UAG by wobble) misreads UGA and a su⁺ tRNA which reads UGA also probably misreads UAA but not UAG.These specific types of errors in translation occur in the absence of streptomycin. The addition of the drug raises their level without altering the pattern described. A ribosomal mutation str A reduces the level of specific misreading; by contrast, a ram mutation strongly increases this level. In all cases the specific pattern is not affected.The rate of specific misreading of nonsense codons in different cases ranges from less than 0.001% to more than 3%. Since the frequency of misreading is sitespecific (unpublished observations), the rates obtained cannot be extrapolated to any other codon at any other site.     

Ribosomal protein L11 mutations in two functional domains equally affect release factors 1 and 2 activity

Bacterial release factors (RFs) 1 and 2 catalyse translation termination at UAG/UAA and UGA/UAA stop codons respectively. It has been shown that limiting the amount of ribosomal protein L11 affects translation termination at UAG and UGA differently. To understand the functional interplay between L11 and RF1/RF2, we isolated 21 distinct mutations in L11 as suppressors of either temperature-sensitive (ts) RF1/RF2 strains or read-through mutants of lacZ nonsense (UAG or UGA) strains. 10 of 21 mutants restored ts lethal growth of RF1 and/or RF2 strains. All the selected L11 mutants, including the RF1ts- and RF2ts-specific suppressors, had the same effect, either enhancing or reducing, on UAG and UGA termination efficiency in vivo. The specific properties of the selected L11 mutations remained unchanged in an RF3 deletion strain. Moreover, ribosomes absent of L11 had equally reduced activity for both RF1- and RF2-mediated peptide release in vitro. These results suggest that, unlike the previous notion, L11 has a common, cooperative role with RF1 and RF2. These L11 mutations were located on the surface of two domains of L11, and interpreted to affect the interaction between L11 and rRNA or the RFs thereby leading to the altered translation termination.