Phylogenetic specificity of prolactin gene expression with conservation of Pit-1 function.

In mammals, the pituitary POU homeodomain protein, Pit-1, binds to proximal and distal 5'-flanking sequences of the PRL gene that dictate tissue-specific expression. These DNA sequences are highly conserved among mammals but are dramatically different from PRL 5' sequences in the teleost species, Oncorhynchus tschawytscha (chinook salmon). To analyze the molecular basis for pituitary-specific gene expression in a distantly related vertebrate, we transfected CAT reporter gene constructs containing 2.4 kilobases (kb) 5'-flanking sequence from the salmon PRL (sPRL) gene into various cell types. Expression of the sPRL gene was restricted to pituitary cells, but in rat pituitary GH4 cells levels of expression were at least 90-fold lower than those obtained with a -3 kb rat PRL (rPRL) construct. Conversely, in primary teleost pituitary cells, -2.4 kb sPRL/CAT was expressed at levels about 10-fold higher than -3 kb rPRL/CAT. To determine whether species-specific transactivation by Pit-1 was sufficient to explain these species differences in PRL gene expression, we isolated a cDNA clone encoding the salmon Pit-1 POU domain and constructed a rat Pit-1 expression vector that contained salmon Pit-1 POU domain sequences substituted in frame. The chimeric Pit-1 encoded 14 amino acids unique to salmon. Coexpression of rat Pit-1 with salmon or rat PRL/CAT in transfected HeLa cells resulted in specific and strikingly comparable levels of promoter activation. Moreover, the specificity and efficacy of the chimeric salmon/rat Pit-1 was similar to wild type rat Pit-1 in activating salmon and rat PRL/CAT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Verapamil: influence upon basal and stimulated rat growth hormone and prolactin release in vitro

Verapamil is an organic calcium antagonist which is believed to prevent the passage of calcium (Ca2+) across the cell membrane into the cell. In a rat pituitary perifusion-immunoprecipitation system, verapamil (50 microM) prevents the inhibitory effect of increased extracellular Ca2+ (5.4 mM) on basal and stimulated release of stored, prelabeled [3H]GH and [3H]PRL. [3H]GH release from pituitary explants perifused in standard medium (GIBCO Minimum Essential Medium: 1.8 mM Ca2+) is transiently increased by 50 microM verapamil while [3H]PRL release is suppressed. With continued exposure to 50 microM verapamil, [3H]GH release rates fall below (89.8 +/- 2.1% of base) preverapamil levels while [3H]PRL release rates simply remain suppressed (48.2 +/- 7.3% of base). With 250 microM verapamil, poststimulatory inhibition of [3H]GH release occurs more quickly, and after its withdrawal rebound release of both GH and PRL occur. Inhibition of [3H]GH release by 25 nM somatostatin (SRIF) and post-SRIF rebound [3H]GH release is not prevented by 50 microM verapamil. The early, rapid [3H]GH release phase of 1 mM dibutyryl cyclic AMP (dbcAMP) stimulation is potentiated by verapamil pretreatment, but only if the verapamil is continued during dbcAMP stimulation. Potassium (21 mM K+)-stimulated release of both 3H-labeled hormones is inhibited after similar pretreatment 50 microM verapamil. Conclusions: (a) verapamil antagonizes the inhibitory effects of increased extracellular Ca2+ on basal or dbcAMP-stimulated [3H]GH and [3H]PRL release; (b) in standard medium (1.8 mM Ca2+), 50 microM verapamil increases basal [3H]GH release suggesting either a direct effect or an antagonism of 1.8 mM extracellular Ca2+; (c) although verapamil-sensitive Ca2+ movement is not necessary for dbcAMP stimulation of [3H]GH release, verapamil potentiates dbcAMP-stimulated release; (d) because verapamil also inhibits K+-stimulated [3H]GH and [3H]PRL release, these observations support previous suggestions that K+- and dbcAMP-stimulated rapid hormone release occurs from different intracellular sites; and (e) because verapamil does not prevent any phase of SRIF action and since these two agents differentially alter K+- and cAMP-stimulated release, their mechanisms of action must partially differ.     

Calcium channel agonists and antagonists: effects of chronic treatment on pituitary prolactin synthesis and intracellular calcium

PRL synthesis by GH cells in culture has previously been shown to increase when calcium is added to cultures grown in calcium-depleted medium or when cultures are treated for 18 h or longer with the dihydropyridine calcium channel agonist BAY K8644, whereas the antagonist nimodipine inhibits PRL. The experiments described here were designed to test whether differences in PRL synthesis caused by the dihydropyridines are due to changes in PRL mRNA levels, whether structurally different classes of calcium channel blockers alter PRL production, and whether long term treatment with calcium channel agonists and antagonists alters intracellular free calcium, [Ca2+]i. PRL synthesis and PRL mRNA levels were increased similarly by BAY K8644 and decreased in parallel by the dihydropyridine antagonist nimodipine, while overall protein and RNA synthesis were not changed by either the agonist or antagonist. Two calcium channel blockers which act at different sites on L-type channels than the dihydropyridines also inhibited PRL synthesis without affecting GH; 5 microM verapamil reduced PRL by 64% and 15 microM diltiazem by 89%. Partial depolarization with 5-25 mM KCl increased PRL synthesis up to 2-fold. The intracellular free calcium ion concentration was estimated by Quin 2 and averaged 142 nM for control cultures in normal medium, and 128 and 168 nM for cultures treated 72 h with nimodipine or BAY K8644, respectively. Nimodipine totally prevented the calcium rise obtained upon depolarization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evidence for a role of topoisomerase II in the Ca2+-dependent basal level expression of the rat prolactin gene

The PRL gene is expressed at a high basal level in rat pituitary tumor GH3 cells, and this basal level enhancement of PRL gene expression is maintained through a Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent mechanism. We have now examined whether the enzyme, DNA topoisomerase II, which has been shown to be phosphorylated by a Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, plays a role in the Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent basal level enhancement of PRL gene expression. The topoisomerase II inhibitor, novobiocin, at concentrations in the range of 35-140 microM, effectively blocked the ability of Ca2+ to increase PRL mRNA levels. Examination of the effects of novobiocin on the levels of protein synthesis, glucose-regulated protein (GRP) 78 mRNA, histone 3 mRNA, and 18S ribosomal RNA indicated that the drug selectivity inhibited PRL gene expression. Two other topoisomerase II inhibitors, m-AMSA and VM26, also diminished the Ca2+-induced levels of PRL mRNA at concentrations (100-400 nM) that did not lower total mRNA levels. We then examined whether topoisomerase II interacted nonrandomly with DNA from the 5' transcribed and 5'-flanking region of the rat PRL gene by in vitro mapping of topoisomerase II DNA cleavage sites. In initial assays with a 10.5 kilobase (kb) PRL genomic DNA fragment containing 3.5 kb of 5'-transcribed DNA and 7 kb of 5'-flanking DNA, we detected 4 major cleavage sites in the following regions: site 1, +1500 to +1600; site 2, +1 to -100; site 3, -1200 to -1300; and site 4, -2900 to -3000.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transcriptional regulation of prolactin gene expression by thyroid hormone--alternate suppression and stimulation in different GH cell lines

Transient expression experiments, using chimeric plasmids containing 3000 base pairs of PRL 5'-flanking sequences linked to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase structural gene, demonstrate that L-T3 can inhibit (GH1 cells) or stimulate (GH4C1 cells) chloramphenicol acetyl transferase activity. Deletion experiments have defined the region necessary for these effects to sequences between -176 and -11 of the PRL gene. This region seems to contain the sequences necessary both for basal expression and for L-T3 regulation. Gel mobility shift experiments revealed that proteins extracted from GH1 and GH4C1 cell nuclei but not rat-2 fibroblasts interact with the PRL gene from -176 to +75. DNase I footprinting studies reveal two footprints which are the same in all pituitary derived cells tested. These footprints are not seen in rat-2 fibroblasts. Neither of these footprints likely represents binding of the L-T3-receptor since extracts from cells containing very low levels of receptor form footprints identical to those from cells with an abundance of receptors. These results suggest that different trans-acting factors, not identifiable by conventional footprinting techniques, are present in these cell lines which account for their opposite responses to L-T3. The regulation of PRL gene expression by L-T3 is unique in that both stimulation and suppression can be demonstrated using a single hormone-gene system. This should allow us to answer fundamental questions regarding the molecular switch between stimulation and suppression of gene expression by hormones.