Eliminating the Neglected Tropical Diseases: Translational Science and New Technologies

Today, the World Health Organization recognizes 17 major parasitic and related infections as the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Despite recent gains in the understanding of the nature and prevalence of NTDs, as well as successes in recent scaled-up preventive chemotherapy strategies and other health interventions, the NTDs continue to rank among the world’s greatest global health problems. For virtually all of the NTDs (including those slated for elimination under the auspices of a 2012 London Declaration for NTDs and a 2013 World Health Assembly resolution [WHA 66.12]), additional control mechanisms and tools are needed, including new NTD drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, and vector control agents and strategies. Elimination will not be possible without these new tools. Here we summarize some of the key challenges in translational science to develop and introduce these new technologies in order to ensure success in global NTD elimination efforts.     

Describing the Prevalence of Neural Tube Defects Worldwide: A Systematic Literature Review

BackgroundFolate-sensitive neural tube defects (NTDs) are an important, preventable cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is a need to describe the current global burden of NTDs and identify gaps in available NTD data.ConclusionsMany WHO member states (120/194) did not have any data on NTD prevalence. Where data are collected, prevalence estimates vary widely. These findings highlight the need for greater NTD surveillance efforts, especially in lower-income countries. NTDs are an important public health problem that can be prevented with folic acid supplementation and fortification of staple foods.     

NTDs V.2.0: “Blue Marble Health”—Neglected Tropical Disease Control and Elimination in a Shifting Health Policy Landscape

The concept of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) was established in the aftermath of the Millennium Development Goals. Here, we summarize the emergence of several new post-2010 global health documents and policies, and how they may alter the way we frame the world''s major NTDs since they were first highlighted. These documents include a new Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study that identifies visceral leishmaniasis and food-borne trematode infections as priority diseases beyond the seven NTDs originally targeted by preventive chemotherapy, a London Declaration for access to essential medicines, and a 2013 World Health Assembly resolution on NTDs. Additional information highlights an emerging dengue fever pandemic. New United Nations resolutions on women and the non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have not yet embraced NTDs, which may actually be the most common afflictions of girls and women and represent a stealth cause of NCDs. NTDs also have important direct and collateral effects on HIV/AIDS and malaria, and there is now a robust evidence base and rationale for incorporating NTDs into the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. “Blue marble health” is an added concept that recognizes a paradoxical NTD disease burden among the poor living in G20 (Group of Twenty) and other wealthy countries, requiring these nations to take greater ownership for both disease control and research and development. As we advance past the year 2015, it will be essential to incorporate global NTD elimination into newly proposed Sustainable Development Goals.     

Scoping review of Neglected Tropical Disease Interventions and Health Promotion: A framework for successful NTD interventions as evidenced by the literature

BackgroundNeglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) affect more than one billion people globally. A Public Library of Science (PLOS) journal dedicated to NTDs lists almost forty NTDs, while the WHO prioritises twenty NTDs. A person can be affected by more than one disease at the same time from a range of infectious and non-infectious agents. Many of these diseases are preventable, and could be eliminated with various public health, health promotion and medical interventions. This scoping review aims to determine the extent of the body of literature on NTD interventions and health promotion activities, and to provide an overview of their focus while providing recommendations for best practice going forward. This scoping review includes both the identification of relevant articles through the snowball method and an electronic database using key search terms. A two-phased screening process was used to assess the relevance of studies identified in the search–an initial screening review followed by data characterization using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they broadly described the characteristics, methods, and approaches of (1) NTD interventions and/or (2) community health promotion.Principal findings90 articles met the CASP criteria partially or fully and then underwent a qualitative synthesis to be included in the review. 75 articles specifically focus on NTD interventions and approaches to their control, treatment, and elimination, while 15 focus specifically on health promotion and provide a grounding in health promotion theories and perspectives. 29 of the articles provided a global perspective to control, treatment, or elimination of NTDs through policy briefs or literature reviews. 19 of the articles focused on providing strategies for NTDs more generally while 12 addressed multiple NTDs or their interaction with other infectious diseases. Of the 20 NTDs categorized by the WHO and the expanded NTD list identified by PLOS NTDs, several NTDs did not appear in the database search on NTD interventions and health promotion, including yaws, fascioliasis, and chromoblastomycosis.ConclusionsBased on the literature we have identified the four core components of best practices including programmatic interventions, multi sectoral and multi-level interventions, adopting a social and ecological model and clearly defining ‘community.’ NTD interventions tend to centre on mass drug administration (MDA), particularly because NTDs were branded as such based on their being amenable to MDA. However, there remains a need for intervention approaches that also include multiple strategies that inform a larger multi-disease and multi-sectoral programme. Many NTD strategies include a focus on WASH and should also incorporate the social and ecological determinants of NTDs, suggesting a preventative and systems approach to health, not just a treatment-based approach. Developing strong communities and incorporating social rehabilitation at the sublocation level (e.g. hospital) could benefit several NTDs and infectious diseases through a multi-disease, multi-sectoral, and multi-lateral approach. Finally, it is important the ‘community’ is clearly defined in each intervention, and that community members are included in intervention activities and viewed as assets to interventions.     

The core histone N-terminal tail domains function independently and additively during salt-dependent oligomerization of nucleosomal arrays

Salt-dependent oligomerization of nucleosomal arrays is related to fiber-fiber interactions and global chromosome structure. Previous studies have shown that the H2A/H2B and H3/H4 N-terminal domain (NTD) pairs are able to mediate array oligomerization. However, because of technical barriers, the function(s) of the individual core histone NTDs have not been investigated. To address this question, all possible combinations of "tailless" nucleosomal arrays were assembled from native and NTD-deleted recombinant Xenopus core histones and tandemly repeated 5 S rDNA. The recombinant arrays were characterized by differential centrifugation over the range of 0-50 mm MgCl2 to determine how each NTD affects salt-dependent oligomerization. Results indicate that all core histone NTDs participate in the oligomerization process and that the NTDs function additively and independently. These observations provide direct biochemical evidence linking all four core histone NTDs to the assembly and maintenance of global chromatin structures.     

Global DNA hypomethylation is associated with NTD‐affected pregnancy: A case‐control study

BACKGROUND: Neural tube defects are severe, common birth defects that result from failure of neural tube closure. They are considered to be a multifactorial disorder, and our knowledge of causal mechanisms remains limited. We hypothesized that abnormal DNA methylation occurs in NTD‐affected fetuses. The correlations of global DNA methylation levels with complexity of NTDs and known risk factors of NTDs, MTHFR genotype and fever, were analyzed. METHODS: A hospital‐based case‐control study was performed. Epidemiologic data, pathologic diagnosis, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype analysis were completed. Array comparative genomic hybridization was used to exclude cytogenetic abnormalities. Global DNA methylation statuses were determined for both brain and skin tissue. RESULTS: Sixty‐five NTD‐affected fetuses and 65 normal controls matched for gestational and maternal ages were collected. In brain tissue, global DNA methylation levels were significantly decreased in cases compared with controls (4.12 vs. 4.99%; p < 0.001). DNA hypomethylation (<4.35%) resulted in a significant 5.736‐fold increased risk for NTDs (95% confidence interval, 1.731–19.009; p = 0.004). Nonisolated NTDs had lower levels of global DNA methylation than did isolated NTDs (3.77 vs. 4.70%; p = 0.022). After stratifying subjects by MTHFR genotype, we observed a skewed distribution of global DNA methylation levels. For genotype C/C, global DNA methylation status was the same in the two groups (4.51 vs. 4.72%; p = 0.687). For T/T, cases had significantly lower global methylation levels than did controls (5.23 vs. 3.79%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Global DNA hypomethylation in fetal brain tissue was associated with NTD‐affected pregnancy. DNA methylation levels were correlated with NTD complexity. The MTHFR genotype contributed to global DNA hypomethylation. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Public Awareness and Knowledge of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) Control Activities in Abuja,Nigeria

The need to engage the public in Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) control activities has become imperative in the context of morbidity reduction through preventive chemotherapy and community participation. Therefore, a survey was conducted among the general public to assess their knowledge and awareness of NTDs control activities in Nigeria. A simple questionnaire was administered to the general public attending a job fair in Abuja, Nigeria. Of the 461 respondents, a significant proportion 337 (73.1%) have heard of NTD before, but only 291 (63.1%) have good knowledge about NTDs. However, among the specific NTDs, only the control of onchocerciasis (50.8%) was of average public awareness in Nigeria, while all the other NTDs control activities were significantly less known to the general public. 397 (87.1%) stated that government support for NTD control activities is poor and were willing to assist to advocate for NTDs control. This survey demonstrates that despite government''s numerous activities towards the control of NTDs in Nigeria, there is little sensitization of the general public. There is a need for policy changes that would raise the participation and involvement of the general public in NTDs control activities for sustainability.     

Diagnosing point-of-care diagnostics for neglected tropical diseases

Inadequate and nonintegrated diagnostics are the Achilles’ heel of global efforts to monitor, control, and eradicate neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). While treatment is often available, NTDs are endemic among marginalized populations, due to the unavailability or inadequacy of diagnostic tests that cause empirical misdiagnoses. The need of the hour is early diagnosis at the point-of-care (PoC) of NTD patients. Here, we review the status quo of PoC diagnostic tests and practices for all of the 24 NTDs identified in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 2021–2030 roadmap, based on their different diagnostic requirements. We discuss the capabilities and shortcomings of current diagnostic tests, identify diagnostic needs, and formulate prerequisites of relevant PoC tests. Next to technical requirements, we stress the importance of availability and awareness programs for establishing PoC tests that fit endemic resource-limited settings. Better understanding of NTD diagnostics will pave the path for setting realistic goals for healthcare in areas with minimal resources, thereby alleviating the global healthcare burden.     

Integration of Water,Sanitation, and Hygiene for the Prevention and Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Rationale for Inter-Sectoral Collaboration

Improvements of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure and appropriate health-seeking behavior are necessary for achieving sustained control, elimination, or eradication of many neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Indeed, the global strategies to fight NTDs include provision of WASH, but few programs have specific WASH targets and approaches. Collaboration between disease control programs and stakeholders in WASH is a critical next step. A group of stakeholders from the NTD control, child health, and WASH sectors convened in late 2012 to discuss opportunities for, and barriers to, collaboration. The group agreed on a common vision, namely “Disease-free communities that have adequate and equitable access to water and sanitation, and that practice good hygiene.” Four key areas of collaboration were identified, including (i) advocacy, policy, and communication; (ii) capacity building and training; (iii) mapping, data collection, and monitoring; and (iv) research. We discuss strategic opportunities and ways forward for enhanced collaboration between the WASH and the NTD sectors.     

Neural tube defects and associated anomalies in South Carolina

BACKGROUND: Neural tube defects (NTDs) occur as isolated malformations and in the company of other birth defects. This study was conducted to determine the frequency of coexisting anomalies and the relationship between them. METHODS: Since 1992, NTDs have been identified through prenatal and postnatal surveillance activities in South Carolina. The type of NTD and presence of associated anomalies were determined by prenatal ultrasound, postnatal and/or postmortem examination. RESULTS: During the ten-year period from 1992 to 2002, 564 NTDs were identified by the surveillance system. Seventeen percent of NTDs (98/564) had associated malformations. In approximately half (n = 51) of these cases, the NTDs and associated anomalies were components of a recognizable syndrome. In the remaining cases (n = 47), no syndrome was identified or suspected, but the associated anomalies were believed in most instances to be secondary to space limitation or neural crest abnormalities imposed by the NTD. CONCLUSION: Seventeen percent of NTDs in South Carolina have associated malformations. In most cases, the associated anomalies are considered either components of a multiple malformation syndrome or secondary to the NTD.     

A polymorphism,R653Q,in the trifunctional enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase/formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase is a maternal genetic risk factor for neural tube defects: report of the Birth Defects Research Group

Women who take folic acid periconceptionally reduce their risk of having a child with a neural tube defect (NTD) by >50%. A variant form of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) (677C-->T) is a known risk factor for NTDs, but the prevalence of the risk genotype explains only a small portion of the protective effect of folic acid. This has prompted the search for additional NTD-associated variants in folate-metabolism enzymes. We have analyzed five potential single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the cytoplasmic, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent, trifunctional enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase/formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase (MTHFD1) for an association with NTDs in the Irish population. One SNP, R653Q, in this gene appears to be associated with NTD risk. We observed an excess of the MTHFD1 "Q" allele in the mothers of children with NTD, compared with control individuals. This excess was driven by the overrepresentation of QQ homozygotes in the mothers of children with NTD compared with control individuals (odds ratio 1.52 [95% confidence interval 1.16-1.99], P=.003). We conclude that genetic variation in the MTHFD1 gene is associated with an increase in the genetically determined risk that a woman will bear a child with NTD and that the gene may be associated with decreased embryo survival.     

Evaluation of transcobalamin II polymorphisms as neural tube defect risk factors in an Irish population

BACKGROUND: Decreased maternal folate levels are associated with having a child with a neural tube defect (NTD), and periconceptual folic acid supplementation reduces this risk by >50%. Vitamin B(12) (as methylcobalamin) is a cofactor for methionine synthase, an enzyme that plays a key role in folate metabolism. Alterations in vitamin B(12) metabolism may influence the development of NTDs. Low levels of maternal plasma vitamin B(12) and reduced binding of vitamin B(12) by transcobalamin II (TCII) are independent risk factors for NTDs. TCII levels are altered in the amniotic fluid of pregnancies affected by NTDs. Given this evidence, inherited variants in genes involved in vitamin B(12) trafficking such as TCII are candidate NTD risk factors. METHODS: We used case/control and family-based association methods to investigate whether six common polymorphisms in the TCII gene influence NTD risk. TCII genotypes were determined for more than 300 Irish NTD families and a comparable number of Irish controls. RESULTS: Allele and genotype frequencies for each polymorphism did not differ between family members and controls. CONCLUSIONS: These six TCII polymorphisms do not strongly influence NTD risk in the Irish population. The Supplementary Material for this article can be found on the Birth Defects Research (Part A) website: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/suppmat/1542-0752/suppmat/2005/73/v73.4.swanson.html     

Diagnostic testing holds the key to NTD elimination

“Fit-for-purpose” diagnostic tests have emerged as a prerequisite to achieving global targets for the prevention, control, elimination, and eradication of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as highlighted by the World Health Organization’s (WHO) new roadmap. There is an urgent need for the development of new tools for those diseases for which no diagnostics currently exist and for improvement of existing diagnostics for the remaining diseases. Yet, efforts to achieve this, and other crosscutting ambitions, are fragmented, and the burden of these 20 debilitating diseases immense. Compounded by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, programmatic interruptions, systemic weaknesses, limited investment, and poor commercial viability undermine global efforts—with a lack of coordination between partners, leading to the duplication and potential waste of scant resources. Recognizing the pivotal role of diagnostic testing and the ambition of WHO, to move forward, we must create an ecosystem that prioritizes country-level action, collaboration, creativity, and commitment to new levels of visibility. Only then can we start to accelerate progress and make new gains that move the world closer to the end of NTDs.

Ahead of the second-ever World Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) Day in January 2021, and amid the global Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a new roadmap for the prevention, control, elimination, and eradication of NTDs—a group of 20 diseases affecting more than one billion people worldwide [1]. Diagnostic testing is central to safeguarding decades of progress in NTDs and must be strategically leveraged to reach the goals laid out in the new NTD roadmap.Stepping back, we recognize the massive progress that has been made to combat NTDs. Today, 500 million fewer people need treatment for these debilitating diseases than in 2010, and 40 countries or areas have eliminated at least one of the 20 [1]. Yet, despite these gains, NTDs continue to impose a devastating human, social, and economic toll on the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities [2–6]. COVID-19 is compounding the situation by wreaking havoc on health systems, which impacts progress on NTDs: this includes interruptions to mass treatment campaigns for diseases controlled through preventive chemotherapy (PCT) or individual case management interventions, as well as rerouting the already sparse available funding and resources [7].Diagnostic testing has been central to the COVID-19 response even with the introduction of vaccines. The rapid ramp up of research and development (R&D), the scaling up of low-cost and decentralized testing, and country-led approaches to tailored testing strategies for COVID-19, as well as lessons learned, can also provide new thinking around testing for NTDs. The new NTD roadmap offers a series of multisectoral actions and intensified, cross-cutting approaches to get us back on track—with diagnostics central to unlocking and accelerating this progress [1].However, the NTD roadmap shows that, of all 20 diseases or disease groups, just 2 (yaws and snakebite envenoming) are supported by adequate and accessible diagnostic tools. Six have no diagnostic tests available at all, with tools for each of the remaining conditions in urgent need of adaptation, modification, and/or improved accessibility (likely a more cost-effective option than the development of new diagnostics for these NTDs) [1]. This has to change. NTDs cannot continue to be neglected in favor of other competing priorities, or we risk losing the progress made to date.Until the COVID-19 pandemic thrust testing into the spotlight, diagnostics have been a “silent partner” in healthcare, receiving little by way of international attention and funding, specific country strategies, and dedicated budget lines. NTDs are no exception. Just 5% of the (limited) funding made available to NTDs has been invested in new diagnostics, compared with 44% and 39% on basic research and medicines and vaccines, respectively [1]. For most NTDs, diagnostics are a market failure situation, and as such, are not commercially viable enough to attract private investment. Consequently, very few diagnostic developers engage in this area—contrary, for example, to COVID-19, where developers are in the hundreds. Furthermore, as some diseases approach the last mile of elimination, falling infection rates precipitate the need for increasingly sensitive tests [1]. But progress in R&D is slow and fragmented, with a lack of engagement and coordination between governments, industry, donors, and development actors, leading to the duplication—and potential waste—of scant resources. While serial testing using multiple diagnostic tools or techniques can compensate for low sensitivity [8], such approaches are associated with increased costs of testing, sample collection, and transportation.Closing the diagnostic gap then, is a prerequisite to achieving the global ambition for NTDs, with the new NTD roadmap giving a blueprint for action. It is for this reason that we call on governments, industry, donors, and development actors to

• Prioritize country-level diagnostic action: As we enter a new era in NTD management and control, we need to shift from traditional, donor-led models to country-driven initiatives. Government ministries must engage with, and advocate on behalf of, their poorest and most vulnerable populations so that no one is left behind. Political frameworks should prioritize diagnostics for NTDs in line with local disease burdens, and as part of fully funded, national health action plans that include a commitment to seeing the process through. Capacity building for diagnostics is also essential at country, sub-regional, and regional levels, including the establishment of laboratory networks, so that testing can be implemented in field settings.
• Collaborate and create: There is never going to be a one-size-fits-all for NTD diagnostics. If targets are to be achieved, we need global frameworks that enable industry, manufacturers, and pharmaceutical companies to engage in the whole process, from R&D to supply chain logistics. Companies need to share knowledge, learnings, and innovation across multiple diseases. This will mean breaking silos and finding new ways to harness the power of existing products, technologies, and infrastructures. Further, it will mean creating economies of scale through regional manufacturing hubs and finding new, cross-cutting approaches to drive systemic change. To obtain the maximum access to technology and relevant intellectual property rights for NTD diagnostics, it is important to ensure that such rights are broadly available (non-exclusively) in NTD-endemic countries and are affordable (e.g., zero royalty rights).
• Commit to new levels of visibility: The resources needed to realize that this ambition is limited, with a lack of visibility around the diagnostic landscape undermining progress in NTD management and control. Creating an ecosystem with visibility, transparency, and integration at its core will help streamline programmatic action, reduce the risk of duplication, and leverage the full potential from this limited pool. To do this, industry, donors, and other development actors must provide the information needed to map both funding and product landscapes. Using this information to create a virtual product pipeline will bring an unprecedented level of transparency to diagnostic developments—harmonizing multisectoral efforts and creating a robust information platform from which new collaborations, synergies, and innovation can grow. Developing an online open-access diagnostic pipeline for WHO NTD roadmap priority pathogens would serve multiple purposes: (i) drive advocacy to address critical product and funding gaps; and (ii) reduce the likelihood of duplication of efforts. Together, this would strengthen partnerships across all stakeholders, from donors to industry partners, to accelerate development, evaluation, and adoption of diagnostic solutions for NTDs. The newly established NTD Diagnostic Technical Advisory Group (DTAG) to WHO NTD department has already identified the priority diagnostic needs for NTD programs not only in terms of developing new tools, but also the accessibility of existing tools [9]. Several sub-groups that focus more narrowly on single diseases or specific topics (i.e., skin NTDs or cross-cutting) have been established and have been tasked to develop tool and biomarker agnostic target product profiles (TPPs), which are now available (for the most part) on WHO website for use by any diagnostic manufacturer to support development of their specific technology. Alignment with these diagnostic priorities by all stakeholders is strongly recommended to facilitate attainment of WHO 2030 NTD roadmap goals.

• Establish NTD biobanks: Biobanks are required for the clinical evaluation and validation of new diagnostic tests. Establishing local biobanks would support a country-driven approach as well as allowing for head-to-head comparisons between tests and assessments of cross-reactivity across different NTDs.
• Invest in existing diagnostics: The development of new diagnostics is a complex process, and the time from development to implementation can be lengthy. Training laboratory staff in the use of existing diagnostics and the establishment of robust quality control systems are effective approaches to achieving shorter-term improvements.

There is a long road ahead, but the past 10 years have shown us what can be achieved when governments, industry, donors, and development actors are bound by a shared, global goal. As we look forward to the next decade, we must prioritize country-level action, collaboration, creativity, and commitment to new levels of visibility, if we are to finally end the neglect of NTDs.     

Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism and neural tube defects: balancing genome synthesis and gene expression

Neural tube defects (NTDs) refer to a cluster of neurodevelopmental conditions associated with failure of neural tube closure during embryonic development. Worldwide prevalence of NTDs ranges from approximately 0.5 to 60 per 10,000 births, with regional and population-specific variation in prevalence. Numerous environmental and genetic influences contribute to NTD etiology; accumulating evidence from population-based studies has demonstrated that folate status is a significant determinant of NTD risk. Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism (OCM) is essential for de novo nucleotide biosynthesis, methionine biosynthesis, and cellular methylation reactions. Periconceptional maternal supplementation with folic acid can prevent occurrence of NTDs in the general population by up to 70%; currently several countries fortify their food supply with folic acid for the prevention of NTDs. Despite the unambiguous impact of folate status on NTD risk, the mechanism by which folic acid protects against NTDs remains unknown. Identification of the mechanism by which folate status affects neural tube closure will assist in developing more efficacious and better targeted preventative measures. In this review, we summarize current research on the relationship between folate status and NTDs, with an emphasis on linking genetic variation, folate nutriture, and specific metabolic and/or genomic pathways that intersect to determine NTD outcomes.     

Folate status and neural tube defects

Periconceptional folic acid supplementation prevents approximately 70% of neural tube defects (NTDs). While most women carrying affected fetuses do not have deficient blood folate levels, the risk of having an NTD affected child is inversely correlated with pregnancy red cell folate levels. Current research is focused on the discovery of genetic abnormalities in folate related enzymes which might explain the role of folate in NTD prevention. The first candidate gene to emerge was the C677T variant of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Normal subjects who are homozygous for the mutation (TT) have red cell folate status some 20% lower than expected. It is now established that the prevalence of the TT genotype is significantly higher among spina bifida cases and their parents. Nevertheless, our studies show that the variant does not account for the reduced blood folate levels in many NTD affected mothers. We conclude that low maternal folate status may in itself be the most important risk factor for NTDs and that food fortification may be the only population strategy of benefit in the effort to eliminate NTDs.     

Reviewing Dengue: Still a Neglected Tropical Disease?

Dengue is currently listed as a “neglected tropical disease” (NTD). But is dengue still an NTD or not? Classifying dengue as an NTD may carry advantages, but is it justified? This review considers the criteria for the definition of an NTD, the current diverse lists of NTDs by different stakeholders, and the commonalities and differences of dengue with other NTDs. We also review the current research gaps and research activities and the adequacy of funding for dengue research and development (R&D) (2003–2013). NTD definitions have been developed to a higher precision since the early 2000s, with the following main features: NTDs are characterised as a) poverty related, b) endemic to the tropics and subtropics, c) lacking public health attention, d) having poor research funding and shortcomings in R&D, e) usually associated with high morbidity but low mortality, and f) often having no specific treatment available. Dengue meets most of these criteria, but not all. Although dengue predominantly affects resource-limited countries, it does not necessarily only target the poor and marginalised in those countries. Dengue increasingly attracts public health attention, and in some affected countries it is now a high profile disease. Research funding for dengue has increased exponentially in the past two decades, in particular in the area of dengue vaccine development. However, despite advances in dengue research, dengue epidemics are increasing in frequency and magnitude, and dengue is expanding to new areas. Specific treatment and a highly effective vaccine remain elusive. Major research gaps exist in the area of integrated surveillance and vector control. Hence, although dengue differs from many of the NTDs, it still meets important criteria commonly used for NTDs. The current need for increased R&D spending, shared by dengue and other NTDs, is perhaps the key reason why dengue should continue to be considered an NTD.     

Analyses of copy number variation reveal putative susceptibility loci in MTX‐induced mouse neural tube defects

Copy number variations (CNVs) are thought to act as an important genetic mechanism underlying phenotypic heterogeneity. Impaired folate metabolism can result in neural tube defects (NTDs). However, the precise nature of the relationship between low folate status and NTDs remains unclear. Using an array‐comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) assay, we investigated whether CNVs could be detected in the NTD embryonic neural tissues of methotrexate (MTX)‐induced folate dysmetabolism pregnant C57BL/6 mice and confirmed the findings with quantitative real‐time PCR (qPCR). The CNVs were then comprehensively investigated using bioinformatics methods to prioritize candidate genes. We measured dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) activity and concentrations of folate and relevant metabolites in maternal serum using enzymologic method and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Three high confidence CNVs on XqA1.1, XqA1.1‐qA2, and XqE3 were found in the NTD embryonic neural tissues. Twelve putative genes and three microRNAs were identified as potential susceptibility candidates in MTX‐induced NTDs and possible roles in NTD pathogenesis. DHFR activity and 5‐methyltetrahydrofolate (5‐MeTHF), 5‐formyltetrahydrofolate (5‐FoTHF), and S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM) concentrations of maternal serum decreased significantly after MTX injection. These findings suggest that CNVs caused by defects in folate metabolism lead to NTD, and further support the hypothesis that folate dysmetabolism is a direct cause for CNVs in MTX‐induced NTDs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 74: 877–893, 2014     

Neural tube defect rates before and after food fortification with folic acid

BACKGROUND: Since 1998, enriched cereal grains sold in the United States have been fortified with folic acid, to reduce the incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently reported that NTD rates have decreased 26% since fortification, but that additional effort is needed to achieve the national goal of a 50% reduction. However, accurate determination of NTD rates requires counting antenatally detected cases; the CDC study noted that the number of prenatally diagnosed cases was likely underestimated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined studies from the United States and Canada that compared rates of NTDs before and after very similar fortification programs were instituted in each country. U.S. studies had incomplete ascertainment of prenatally diagnosed NTD cases, and as a result, underreported the number of NTDs prevented. Canadian studies, in which ascertainment was more complete, showed decreases in NTD rates up to 54%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong correlation between the completeness of ascertainment and the percentage decrease in NTD rates. Studies that identify cases best show that folic acid fortification is preventing around 50% of NTDs. The percentage of NTDs that are folate-preventable in the United States is uncertain, but is probably 50-60%. Thus, we may be quite close to achieving the optimum level of protection at current fortification levels.     

Uncoupling protein 2 polymorphisms as risk factors for NTDs

BACKGROUND: Both environmental and genetic factors are involved in the etiology of NTDs. Inadequate folate intake and obesity are important environmental risk factors. Several folate‐related genetic variants have been identified as risk factors; however, little is known about how genetic variants relate to the increased risk seen in obese women. Uncoupling Protein 2 (UCP2) is an attractive candidate to screen for NTD risk because of its possible role in obesity as well as energy metabolism, type‐2 diabetes, and the regulation of reactive oxygen species. Interestingly, a previous study found that a common UCP2 compound homozygous genotype was associated with a threefold increase in NTD risk. METHODS: We evaluated three polymorphisms, ‐866G>A, A55V, and the 3′UTR 45 bp insertion/deletion, as risk factors for NTDs in Irish NTD cases (n = 169), their mothers (n = 163), their fathers (n = 167), and normal control subjects (n = 332). RESULTS: Allele and genotype frequencies were not significantly different when comparing NTD mothers, NTD fathers, or affected children to controls. Additionally, the previously reported risk genotype (combined homozygosity of 55VV and 3′UTR 45 bp deletion/deletion) was not present at a higher frequency in any NTD group when compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: In our Irish study population, UCP2 polymorphisms did not influence NTD risk. Moreover, the prevalence of this allele in other populations was similar to the Irish prevalence but far lower than reported in the previous NTD study, suggesting that this previous finding of an association with NTDs might have been due to an unrepresentative study sample. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Periconceptional maternal alcohol consumption and neural tube defects

BACKGROUND: Neural tube defects (NTD)s, which occur when the neural tube fails to close during early gestation, are some of the most common birth defects worldwide. Alcohol is a known teratogen and has been shown to induce NTDs in animal studies, although most human studies have failed to corroborate these results. Using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, associations between maternal reports of periconceptional (1 month prior through 2 months postconception) alcohol consumption and NTDs were examined. METHODS: NTD cases and unaffected live born control infants, delivered from 1997 through 2005, were included. Interview reports of alcohol consumption (quantity, frequency, variability, and type) were obtained from 1223 case mothers and 6807 control mothers. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR)s and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: For all NTDs combined, most aORs for any alcohol consumption, one or more binge episodes, and different type(s) of alcohol consumed were near unity or modestly reduced (≥0.7<aOR≤1.1) and were not statistically significant. Findings were similar for individual NTD subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest no elevated association between maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption and NTDs. Underreporting of alcohol consumption, due to negative social stigma associated with alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and limited reports for mothers with early pregnancy loss of a fetus with an NTD may have affected the estimated odds ratios. Future studies should aim to increase sample sizes for less prevalent subtypes, reduce exposure misclassification, and improve ascertainment offetal deaths and elective terminations. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.