Cell migration, pattern formation and cell fate during head development in lungfishes and amphibians

Summary In the evolution of land-living vertebrates, the transition from spending the entire life cycle in the water to first a biphasic (adult on land, eggs and larvae in water) and later a terrestrial life-history mode was achieved by changes in developmental processes and regulatory mechanisms. Lungfishes, salamanders and frogs are studied as examples of species which span this transition. The migration and fate of the embryonic cells that form the head is studied, using experimental embryology (extirpation and transplantation of cells), molecular markers and novel microscopy techniques — such as confocal microscopy. Knowing the migratory routes and fates of the cells that form head structures is important for an elucidation of the changes that took place e.g. when gill arches transformed into head cartilages, and when the specialised larval mouth structures present in today’s frogs and toads arose as an evolutionary innovation. Results so far indicate that the early migration and pattern formation of neural crest cells in the head region is surprisingly conserved. Both the amphibians investigated and the Australian lungfish have the same number of migrating neural crest streams, and the identity of the streams is preserved. The major difference lies in the timing of migration, where there has been a heterochronic shift such that cell migration starts much later in the Australian lungfish than in the amphibians. The molecular mechanisms regulating the formation of streams of cranial neural crest cells seem, at least in part, to be differential expression of ephrins and ephrin receptors, which mediate cell sorting. Our understanding of the behaviour of migrating cells (primarily the more well characterised neural crest cells) could be enhanced by a modelling approach. I present preliminary ideas on how this could be achieved, inspired by recent work on Dictyostelium development and our own previous work on pigment cells and their pattern formation during salamander embryogenesis.     

Blocking endogenous FGF-2 activity prevents cranial osteogenesis

Normal growth and morphogenesis of the cranial vault reflect a balance between cell proliferation in the sutures and osteogenesis at the margins of the cranial bones. In the clinical condition craniosynostosis, the sutures fuse prematurely as a result of precocious osteogenic differentiation and craniofacial malformation results. Mutations in several fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genes have now been identified as being responsible for the major craniosynostotic syndromes. We have used a grafting technique to manipulate the levels of endogenous FGF-2 ligand in embryonic chick cranial vaults and thereby perturb morphogenesis. Implantation of beads loaded with FGF-2 did not affect normal cranial development at physiological concentrations, although they elicited a morphogenetic response in the limb. Implantation of beads loaded with a neutralising antibody to FGF-2 generated a concentration-dependent response. When a single bead was implanted, the grafts grew to a massive size as a result of increased cell division in the tissue. With greater inactivation of FGF-2 protein (two to three beads implanted), all further bone differentiation and cell proliferation was blocked. These data further support the emerging idea that the intensity of FGF-mediated signalling determines the developmental fate of the skeletogenic cells in the cranial vault. High and low levels correlate with differentiation and proliferation, respectively. A balance between the two ensures normal cranial vault morphogenesis. This is consistent with the observation that several FGFR mutations causing craniosynostosis result in constitutive activation of the receptor.     

Are protochordates chordates?

This paper challenges the widely accepted view that protochordates (lancelets and tunicates) should be included together with vertebrates within the monophyletic assemblage of the chordates since they share a few distinguishing characters, such as a dorsally located notochord and central nervous system (CNS). The homology of these axial structures is not supported convincingly by morphology and molecular biology. Besides, for notochord and CNS to be dorsal, the embryos of protochordates, unlike those of vertebrates, should be orientated with the blastopore coincident with the dorsal side. This embryonic orientation is never reported in other bilaterians and is inconsistent with the genetic control of the body axes. Alternatively, protochordates could be orientated just as the vertebrates according to the regulation of axial patterning. In this case, the notochord and CNS appear to be located on the ventral side. As suggested by molecular and structural data, they may correspond to the stomodaeal/ventral midline cells and CNS of gastroneuralians. This conclusion may have far-reaching implications concerning the origin of the vertebrates and the evolution of nervous systems and neural crest/placodes.  © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2006, 87 , 261–284.     

Evolutionary developmental biology and vertebrate head segmentation: A perspective from developmental constraint

Summary The question of vertebrate head segmentation has become one of the central issues in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Beginning as a theory based in comparative anatomy, a segmental theory of the head has been adopted and further developed by comparative embryologists. With the use of molecular and cellular biology, and in particular analyses of the Hox gene complex, the question has been addressed at new levels, but it remains unresolved. In this review, vertebrate head segmentation is reevaluated, by introducing findings from experimental embryology and evolutionary biology. Developmental biology has shown that pattern is generated through hierarchically organized and causally linked series of events. The question of head segmentation can be viewed as a question of generative constraint, that is whether segmentation in the head is imposed by underlying segmental patterns, as it is in the trunk. In this respect, amphioxus appears to be segmented along the entire anteroposterior axis, with myotomes and peripheral nerves repeating with the same rhythm (somitomerism). Similarly, in the vertebrate trunk, the segmental patterns shared by myotomes, peripheral nerves and vertebrae are derived from the somites. However, in the head of vertebrates there is no such mesodermal pattern, although neuromerism and branchiomerism do indicate the presence of constraints derived from rhombomeres and pharyngeal pouches, respectively. These data fit better the concept of dual metamerism of the vertebrate body proposed by Romer (1972), than the traditional head cavity-based segmental model by Goodrich (1930).     

Pseudooneotodusi a histological study of an Ordovician to Devonian vertebrate lineage

Detailed histological investigations have shed new light on the nature of Pseudooneotodus Drygant, 1974 (?Arenig/ljanvirn - Emsian). The genus has generally been interpreted as a conodont and is represented by squat phosphatic cones. These conodont dements show a differentiation into a lamellar cap, indistinguishable from vertebrate enamel, which is underlain by a spherulitic basal tissue with several characters indicative of dentine. The presence of these two issues in the elements of a conodont argues persuasively for the. vertebrate classification of the cladc, and illustrates that at least some conodonts have a hard tissue complex which is histologically indistinguishable from those of other primitive vertebrates. These observations have potentially important implications for conodont classification and the stratigraphic first appearances of vertebrate hard tissues.     

Developmental Morphology of the Head Mesoderm and Reevaluation of Segmental Theories of the Vertebrate Head: Evidence from Embryos of an Agnathan Vertebrate, Lampetra japonica

Due to the peculiar morphology of its preotic head, lampreys have long been treated as an intermediate animal which links amphioxus and gnathostomes. To reevaluate the segmental theory of classical comparative embryology, mesodermal development was observed in embryos of a lamprey, Lampetra japonica, by scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Signs of segmentation are visible in future postotic somites at an early neurula stage, whereas the rostral mesoderm is unsegmented and rostromedially confluent with the prechordal plate. The premandibular and mandibular mesoderm develop from the prechordal plate in a caudal to rostral direction and can be called the preaxial mesoderm as opposed to the caudally developing gastral mesoderm. With the exception of the premandibular mesoderm, the head mesodermal sheet is secondarily regionalized by the otocyst and pharyngeal pouches into the mandibular mesoderm, hyoid mesoderm, and somite 0. The head mesodermal components never develop into cephalic myotomes, but the latter develop only from postotic somites. These results show that the lamprey embryo shows a typical vertebrate phylotype and that the basic mesodermal configuration of vertebrates already existed prior to the split of agnatha-gnathostomata; lamprey does not represent an intermediate state between amphioxus and gnathostomes. Unlike interpretations of theories of head segmentation that the mesodermal segments are primarily equivalent along the axis, there is no evidence in vertebrate embryos for the presence of preotic myotomes. We conclude that mesomere-based theories of head metamerism are inappropriate and that the formulated vertebrate head should possess the distinction between primarily unsegmented head mesoderm which includes preaxial components at least in part and somites in the trunk which are shared in all the known vertebrate embryos as the vertebrate phylotype.     

Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault.

During mammalian evolution, expansion of the cerebral hemispheres was accompanied by expansion of the frontal and parietal bones of the skull vault and deployment of the coronal (fronto-parietal) and sagittal (parietal-parietal) sutures as major growth centres. Using a transgenic mouse with a permanent neural crest cell lineage marker, Wnt1-Cre/R26R, we show that both sutures are formed at a neural crest-mesoderm interface: the frontal bones are neural crest-derived and the parietal bones mesodermal, with a tongue of neural crest between the two parietal bones. By detailed analysis of neural crest migration pathways using X-gal staining, and mesodermal tracing by DiI labelling, we show that the neural crest-mesodermal tissue juxtaposition that later forms the coronal suture is established at E9.5 as the caudal boundary of the frontonasal mesenchyme. As the cerebral hemispheres expand, they extend caudally, passing beneath the neural crest-mesodermal interface within the dermis, carrying with them a layer of neural crest cells that forms their meningeal covering. Exposure of embryos to retinoic acid at E10.0 reduces this meningeal neural crest and inhibits parietal ossification, suggesting that intramembranous ossification of this mesodermal bone requires interaction with neural crest-derived meninges, whereas ossification of the neural crest-derived frontal bone is autonomous. These observations provide new perspectives on skull evolution and on human genetic abnormalities of skull growth and ossification.     

大荔颅骨在人类进化中的位置

本文将大荔颅骨的一系列形态特征与中国的直立人、欧洲和非洲的中更新世人、欧洲和亚洲的尼安德特人、中国和欧洲的早期现代人以及现生现代人的数据进行比较,发现可以归纳为几种状况。大荔颅骨:1)与其他中更新世颅骨比较一致,而与早期现代人相去较远;2)与早期和现生现代人一致或接近,显得比其他中更新世人进步;3)在中国早期现代人或现代人变异范围内,也在欧洲中更新世人变异范围内或与之接近,却与中国直立人相距较远;4)处于一般中更新世人与早期现代人之间的中间状态;5)处于中国直立人与中国早期现代人之间的中间位置,而且比较接近欧洲/非洲中更新世人;6)与东亚多数化石人比较一致,而与旧大陆西部中更新世化石人相去较远;7)与中国直立人显然不同,而与欧洲/非洲中更新世人更加接近;8)与非洲中更新世人接近,而与中国直立人和欧洲中更新世人差距较大;9)与大多数中更新世人不同,似乎是自身独有或罕见的。基于这样复杂的状况,作者提出,大荔颅骨既不属于直立人,也不属于海德堡人,表现为兼具东亚的直立人、欧洲和非洲中更新世人的特征,而且是这些共有特征与早期现代人部分特征的镶嵌体,可能比中国的直立人对中国现代人的形成做出过更大的贡献。     

Vertebrate head development: Segmentation,novelties, and homology

Vertebrate head development is a classical topic lately invigorated by methodological as well as conceptual advances. In contrast to the classical segmentalist views going back to idealistic morphology, the head is now seen not as simply an extension of the trunk, but as a structure patterned by different mechanisms and tissues. Whereas the trunk paraxial mesoderm imposes its segmental pattern on adjacent tissues such as the neural crest derivatives, in the head the neural crest cells carry pattern information needed for proper morphogenesis of mesodermal derivatives, such as the cranial muscles. Neural crest cells make connective tissue components which attach the muscle fiber to the skeletal elements. These crest cells take their origin from the same visceral arch as the muscle cells, even when the skeletal elements to which the muscle attaches are from another arch. The neural crest itself receives important patterning influences from the pharyngeal endoderm. The origin of jaws can be seen as an exaptation in which a heterotopic shift of the expression domains of regulatory genes was a necessary step that enabled this key innovation. The jaws are patterned by Dlx genes expressed in a nested pattern along the proximo-distal axis, analogous to the anterior–posterior specification governed by Hox genes. Knocking out Dlx 5 and 6 transforms the lower jaw homeotically into an upper jaw. New data indicate that both upper and lower jaw cartilages are derived from one, common anlage traditionally labelled the “mandibular” condensation, and that the “maxillary” condensation gives rise to other structures such as the trabecula. We propose that the main contribution from evolutionary developmental biology to solving homology questions lies in deepening our biological understanding of characters and character states.     

Dual origins of the prechordal cranium in the chicken embryo

The prechordal cranium, or the anterior half of the neurocranial base, is a key structure for understanding the development and evolution of the vertebrate cranium, but its embryonic configuration is not well understood. It arises initially as a pair of cartilaginous rods, the trabeculae, which have been thought to fuse later into a single central stem called the trabecula communis (TC). Involvement of another element, the intertrabecula, has also been suggested to occur rostral to the trabecular rods and form the medial region of the prechordal cranium. Here, we examined the origin of the avian prechordal cranium, especially the TC, by observing the craniogenic and precraniogenic stages of chicken embryos using molecular markers, and by focal labeling of the ectomesenchyme forming the prechordal cranium. Subsequent to formation of the paired trabeculae, a cartilaginous mass appeared at the midline to connect their anterior ends. During this midline cartilage formation, we did not observe any progressive medial expansion of the trabeculae. The cartilages consisted of premandibular ectomesenchyme derived from the cranial neural crest. This was further divided anteroposteriorly into two portions, derived from two neural crest cell streams rostral and caudal to the optic vesicle, called preoptic and postoptic neural crest cells, respectively. Fate-mapping analysis elucidated that the postoptic neural crest cells were distributed exclusively in the lateroposterior part of the prechordal cranium corresponding to the trabeculae, whereas the preoptic stream of cells occupied the middle anterior part, differentiating into a cartilage mass corresponding to the intertrabecula. These results suggest that the central stem of the prechordal cranium of gnathostomes is composed of two kinds of distinct cartilaginous modules: a pair of trabeculae and a median intertrabecula, each derived from neural crest cells populating distinct places of the craniofacial primordia through specific migratory pathways.