The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation

We model the evolution of plant mating systems under the joint effects of pollen discounting and pollen limitation, using a dynamic model of inbreeding depression, allowing for partial purging of recessive lethal mutations by selfing. Stable mixed mating systems occur for a wide range of parameter values with pollen discounting alone. However, when typical levels of pollen limitation are combined with pollen discounting, stable selfing rates are always high but less than 1 (0.9相似文献   

The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy in Myosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride (Boraginaceae)

The relative amounts of self- and cross-pollen deposited on stigmas depends on both the number of pollinator visits that occur within plants and the amount of pollen carryover. Data collected for Myosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride and compiled from a survey of the literature, reveal that pollen carryover is frequently very high (upwards of 80%) and this at least partially relieves some of the effects of geitonogamous pollinator movements. It is suggested that in some cases, selection for traits that confer a high rate of pollen carryover may occur. Aspects of the plant–pollinator interaction that are likely to influence pollen carryover are discussed.     

Pollen dynamics of bumble-bee visitation on Echium vulgare

1. We quantified pollen deposition on the stigma, pollen removal from the anthers and pollen losses in Echium vulgare , visited by workers of Bombus terrestris under controlled conditions. We used dye as a pollen analogue. Bumble-bees were trained to visit a sequence of non-emasculated flowers to estimate pollen carryover and to visit individual flowers to estimate pollen loss.
2. Carryover of pollen grains and dye particles between flowers was similar, which justifies using dye as a pollen analogue. On average 93·8% of the dye particles on the bee were carried over to the next flower. Only a small fraction of the pollen grains was deposited on the stigma (0·15%). A much larger fraction (6·1%) was lost in another way: passively during flight, through grooming or on floral parts other than the stigma. The bees removed 44% of the pollen grains from a fresh flower and 50·3% of this removed pollen adhered to the bee.
3. We predict that, using the parameters mentioned above, during a single visit to a newly opened flower, a bee collects an amount of pollen grains which will bring about 60% geitonogamous self-pollination in the next flower visited. The expected percentage of self-pollination is considerably less if bees visit flowers that have been visited before.     

Isolation,purification and preliminary characterization of cryophilic proteases of marine origin

The isolation and preliminary characterization of a trypsin-like protease with high activity at 20 °C is described. This protease was isolated from Antarctic krill (Euphasia superba) by a two-step chromatography process and the use of zymogram analyses. The protease has a molecular weight of 30 kDa and a pI of 4.1. Its specific activity at 20 °C on BAPNA is 0.5 U/mg. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

An introductory ecological biogeography of the Australo-Pacific Meliphagidae

Abstract

The Meliphagidae, that can readily be defined on tongue characteristics, are a monophyletic group centred in the Australo-Pacific region, but with one African genus (Promerops). The classification of Salomonsen (1967) allows 38 genera and 170 species in the former region, and one genus with two species in the latter. Australia and New Guinea jointly have 23 genera and 108 species, and constitute the centre of diversity of the group. Endemic genera are concentrated in Australia and New Guinea, and around the periphery of the Pacific part of the range (Sulawesi, Bonins, Marianas, Hawaii, New Zealand). The meliphagids are diversified in body size and bill form. They are basically nectarivores and insectivores, with most species combining the two roles to varying degrees. There is a good general correlation between bill form and way of life. A few species feed on trunks and aerial flycatching is well developed in many. Morphological modification is only minor in these instances and the meliphagids as a group remain rather generalised in bodily proportions. A long period of coevolution with Australian plant elements is shown by meliphagids being the major pollinators of several tree and shrub genera.

The group combines monotypic genera with restricted ranges and wide-ranging genera with many species. Of the latter; Myzomela, Lichema, and Philemon are centred in the tropics, and Meliphaga and Phylidonyris in Australia. Most of these co-occur over a wide area, this being favoured by differences in body size and bill morphology.

Comparison of three kinds of meliphagid communities, two typical continental ones, two of isolated forest outlyers in Australia, and six insular Pacific ones, shows the first to be rich (10 and 11 genera, 21 and 17 species), and the second impoverished (6 and 7 genera, 9 and 12 species). Individual Pacific island groups, however, have only 2–5 genera, and 3–6 species. Genus to species ratios are 0.55–0.64 in the major continental communities, but are 1.0 in New Zealand and Samoa.

Morphological distance between species, measured as the percent difference in size between successive members along a size gradient is 5.4 and 5.5% for wing length and 4.9 and 9.3% for bill length in the two continental communities. It increases to 7.8–14.9, and 11.3–12.7%, respectively, in the isolated forest outlyers of Tasmania and southwestern Australia. The figures are 23.0 and 35.0% for wing and bill length in New Zealand, and 41.0 and 51.0% in Fijian forms. This accords with current theory that in impoverished insular environments, size separation of co-occurring species must be greater.

The marked success of the Meliphagidae in the Australo-Pacific region can be attributed to their versatility and adaptibility, and dual role of insectivore and nectarivore in an area exceptionally rich in nectar-producing trees and shrubs.     

The structure and function of orchid pollinaria

Cohesive masses of pollen known as pollinia have evolved independently in two plant families — Orchidaceae and Asclepiadaceae. Yet, the bilateral symmetry of orchids has allowed a greater degree of specialization in pollination systems and a much greater diversity in the morphology of pollinaria — units comprising the pollinia(um) together with accessory structures for attachment to the pollinator. Pollinaria differ in the degree of cohesion of pollen in the pollinium, which may be soft, sectile (comprised of sub-units known as massulae) or hard. A single hard pollinium may contain more than a million pollen grains, yet pollen:ovule ratios in orchids are several orders of magnitude lower than in plants with powdery pollen due to the lack of wastage during transport to the stigma. Attachment of pollinia to the pollinator is usually achieved by means of a viscidium that adheres most effectively to smooth surfaces, such as the eyes and mouthparts of insects and beaks of birds. The stalk connecting a pollinium to the viscidium may be comprised of a caudicle (sporogenous in origin) and/or a stipe (derived from vegetative tissue), or be lacking altogether. Caudicles and stipes may undergo a gradual bending movement 20 s to several hours after withdrawal from the flower, the main function of which appears to be to reduce the possibility of geitonogamous pollination. Other mechanisms that promote outcrossing and pollen export in orchids include pollen carryover (achieved by sectile or soft pollinia), temporary retention of the anther cap, protandry and self-incompatibility (rare among orchids). Pollinaria ensure that large pollen loads are deposited on the stigma, thus enabling the fertilization of the large numbers of ovules in the flowers of Orchidaceae. Pollinaria also ensure efficient removal of pollen from the anther, minimal pollen wastage during transit, and a high probability of deposition on conspecific stigmas.     

Honeyeater ecology: An introduction

Abstract

Nectar-feeding birds are often used for testing quantitative models but most of this work has been done on groups in the Northern Hemisphere and only recently have workers turned their attention to honeyeaters (Meliphagidae). Predictions of upper size limits derived from North America appear inappropriate and possible reasons for this are discussed. One; the suggested evolutionary links between nectar-feeding birds and their flowers, may not be as close for honeyeaters but further work is needed. Other aspects such as research on community and social relationships among honeyeaters appears rewarding but little is known.

We caution workers on expecting agreement with wide generalisations in any topic because of known variability in movements and diet in different areas and for different individuals.