Unscheduled expression of cyclins D1 and D3 in human tumour cell lines

D-type cyclins are involved in regulation of cell traverse through G₁ primarily by activating the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and targeting it to the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor protein. There is a vast body of evidence that defective expression of D-type cyclins is associated with tumour development and/or progression. Immunocytochemical detection of D cyclins combined with multiparameter flow cytometry makes it possible to measure the expression of these proteins in individual cells in relation to their cell cycle position without the need for cell synchronization. This approach was used in the present study to compare the cell cycle phase specific expression of cyclins D3 and D1 in human normal proliferating lymphocytes and fibroblasts, respectively, with nine tumour cell lines of different lineage. During exponential, unperturbed growth, expression of cyclin D1 in fibroblasts from donors of different age, or cyclin D3 in lymphocytes, was limited to mid-G₁ cells: Less than 7% of the cells entering S phase or progressing through S and G₂ were cyclin D positive. In contrast, expression of either cyclin D1 or cyclin D3 in tumour cell lines of different lineage was not limited to G₁ phase. Namely, over 80% of the cells in S and G₂+M were cyclin D positive in eight of the nine cell lines studied. The data indicate that while expression of cyclin D1 or D3 in normal cells is discontinuous, occurring transiently in G₁, these proteins are expressed in some tumour lines persistently throughout the cell cycle. This suggests that the partner kinase CDK4 is perpetually active throughout the cell cycle in these tumour lines.     

Growth factor, steroid, and steroid antagonist regulation of cyclin gene expression associated with changes in T-47D human breast cancer cell cycle progression.

Cyclins and proto-oncogenes including c-myc have been implicated in eukaryotic cell cycle control. The role of cyclins in steroidal regulation of cell proliferation is unknown, but a role for c-myc has been suggested. This study investigated the relationship between regulation of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression, particularly by steroids and their antagonists, and changes in the levels of expression of these genes. Sequential induction of cyclins D1 (early G1 phase), D3, E, A (late G1-early S phase), and B1 (G2 phase) was observed following insulin stimulation of cell cycle progression in serum-free medium. Transient acceleration of G1-phase cells by progestin was also accompanied by rapid induction of cyclin D1, apparent within 2 h. This early induction of cyclin D1 and the ability of delayed administration of antiprogestin to antagonize progestin-induced increases in both cyclin D1 mRNA and the proportion of cells in S phase support a central role for cyclin D1 in mediating the mitogenic response in T-47D cells. Compatible with this hypothesis, antiestrogen treatment reduced the expression of cyclin D1 approximately 8 h before changes in cell cycle phase distribution accompanying growth inhibition. In the absence of progestin, antiprogestin treatment inhibited T-47D cell cycle progression but in contrast did not decrease cyclin D1 expression. Thus, changes in cyclin D1 gene expression are often, but not invariably, associated with changes in the rate of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression. However, both antiestrogen and antiprogestin depleted c-myc mRNA by > 80% within 2 h. These data suggest the involvement of both cyclin D1 and c-myc in the steroidal control of breast cancer cell cycle progression.     

Threshold expression of cyclin E but not D type cyclins characterizes normal and tumour cells entering S phase

Complexes of cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk) and their partner cyclins drive the cell through the cell cycle, each such complex phosphorylating a distinct set of proteins at a particular check-point or phase of the cycle. Immunocytochemical detection of cyclins combined with measurement of cellular DNA content by flow cytometry makes it possible to relate expression of each of these proteins with the actual cell cycle position, without the necessity of cell synchronization. In the present study, we have investigated expression of E and D type cyclins in G₁ cells and in cells entering S phase, in eight different human hematopoietic and solid tumour cell lines (two leukaemias, a lymphoma, three breast carcinomas, a colon carcinoma and a bladder transitional cell carcinoma) during their exponential phase of growth, as well as in normal mitogen stimulated lymphocytes. In all the cell types studied, the average level of D type cyclin expression was invariable throughout the cell cycle. A great intercellular variability, in particular of the G₁ cell subpopulations, and the presence of a large fraction of G₁, S and G₂+ M cells that were cyclin D negative (20–40% in tumour cell lines and about 80% among lymphocytes), were other characteristic features of D type cyclin expression. In contrast to D type cyclins, the expression of cyclin E was discontinuous during the cycle, peaking at the time of cell entrance to S. Also, a well defined threshold in expression of cyclin E characterized cells that were entering S phase, and virtually no cyclin E negative cells were seen during the early portion of S phase. The data indicate that while cell entrance to S phase is unrelated to expression of D type cyclins (at the time of entrance), accumulation of cyclin E up to critical level is a prerequisite for initiation of DNA replication. The great intercellular variability in expression of D type cyclins and their invariant average level across the cell cycle suggest that these cyclins, in addition to their acknowledged function in promoting cell progression through mid- to late-G₁ may have other role(s), related or unrelated to the cell cycle progression. The presence of a large number of D type cyclin negative cells in all phases of the cycle suggests that during exponential growth the cells may not express this protein and yet may traverse the cycle, including G₁ phase.     

Overexpression of WDR79 in non‐small cell lung cancer is linked to tumour progression

WD‐repeat protein 79 (WDR79), a member of the WD‐repeat protein family, acts as a scaffold protein, participating in telomerase assembly, Cajal body formation and DNA double‐strand break repair. Here, we first report that WDR79 is frequently overexpressed in cell lines and tissues derived from non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Knockdown of WDR79 significantly inhibited the proliferation of NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. WD‐repeat protein 79 ‐induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase was associated with the expression of G0/G1‐related cyclins and cyclin‐dependent kinase complexes. We also provide evidence that WDR79 knockdown induces apoptosis via a mitochondrial pathway. Collectively, these results suggest that WDR79 is involved in the tumorigenesis of NSCLC and is a potential novel diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for NSCLC.     

Epigenetic regulation of miR‐129‐2 and its effects on the proliferation and invasion in lung cancer cells

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a pivotal role in carcinogenesis. Dysregulation of miRNAs, both oncogenic miRNAs and tumour‐suppressive miRNAs, is closely associated with cancer development and progression. The levels of miRNAs could be changed epigenetically by DNA methylation in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of pre‐mature miRNAs. To investigate whether DNA methylation alters the expression of miR‐129 in lung cancer, we did DNA methylation assays and found that 5′ UTR region of miR‐129‐2 gene was absolutely methylated in both A549 and SPCA‐1 lung cancer cells, but totally un‐methylated in 95‐D cells. The expression of miR‐129 was restored by 5‐Aza‐2'‐deoxycytidine (DAC), a de‐methylation agent, in both A549 and SPCA‐1 cells, resulting in attenuated cell migration and invasion ability, and decreased protein level of NF‐κB, which indicates the involvement of NF‐κB pathway. To further illustrate the roles of miR‐129 in lung tumourigenesis, we overexpressed miR‐129 in lung cancer cells by transfection of miR‐129 mimics, and found arrested cell proliferation at G2/M phase of cell cycle and inhibited cell invasion. These findings strongly suggest that miR‐129 is a tumour suppressive miRNA, playing important roles in the development and progression of human lung cancer.     

SmgGDS-558 regulates the cell cycle in pancreatic,non-small cell lung,and breast cancers

Oncogenic mutation or misregulation of small GTPases in the Ras and Rho families can promote unregulated cell cycle progression in cancer. Post-translational modification by prenylation of these GTPases allows them to signal at the cell membrane. Splice variants of SmgGDS, named SmgGDS-607 and SmgGDS-558, promote the prenylation and membrane trafficking of multiple Ras and Rho family members, which makes SmgGDS a potentially important regulator of the cell cycle. Surprisingly little is known about how SmgGDS-607 and SmgGDS-558 affect cell cycle-regulatory proteins in cancer, even though SmgGDS is overexpressed in multiple types of cancer. To examine the roles of SmgGDS splice variants in the cell cycle, we compared the effects of the RNAi-mediated depletion of SmgGDS-558 vs. SmgGDS-607 on cell cycle progression and the expression of cyclin D1, p27, and p21 in pancreatic, lung, and breast cancer cell lines. We show for the first time that SmgGDS promotes proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells, and we demonstrate that SmgGDS-558 plays a greater role than SmgGDS-607 in cell cycle progression as well as promoting cyclin D1 and suppressing p27 expression in multiple types of cancer. Silencing both splice variants of SmgGDS in the cancer cell lines produces an alternative signaling profile compared with silencing SmgGDS-558 alone. We also show that loss of both SmgGDS-607 and SmgGDS-558 simultaneously decreases tumorigenesis of NCI-H1703 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) xenografts in mice. These findings indicate that SmgGDS promotes cell cycle progression in multiple types of cancer, making SmgGDS a valuable target for cancer therapeutics.     

Cyclin D3 expression in melanoma cells is regulated by adhesion-dependent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and contributes to G1-S progression

D-type cyclins regulate G1 cell cycle progression by enhancing the activities of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), and their expression is frequently altered in malignant cells. We and others have previously shown that cyclin D1 is up-regulated in melanoma cells through adhesion-independent MEK-ERK1/2 signaling initiated by mutant B-RAF. Here, we describe the regulation and role of cyclin D3 in human melanoma cells. Cyclin D3 expression was enhanced in a cell panel of human melanoma cell lines compared with melanocytes and was regulated by fibronectin-mediated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling but not MEK activity. RNA interference experiments demonstrated that cyclin D3 contributed to G1-S cell cycle progression and proliferation in melanoma cells. Overexpression of cyclin D1 did not recover the effects of cyclin D3 knockdown. Finally, immunoprecipitation studies showed that CDK6 is a major binding partner for cyclin D3, whereas CDK4 preferentially associated with cyclin D1. Together, these findings demonstrate that cyclin D3 is an important regulator of melanoma G1-S cell cycle progression and that D-type cyclins are differentially regulated in melanoma cells.     

Targeting LIMK1 with luteolin inhibits the growth of lung cancer in vitro and in vivo

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. LIM domain kinase (LIMK) 1 is a member of serine/threonine kinase family and highly expressed in various cancers. Luteolin, a polyphenolic plant flavonoid, has been reported to suppress tumour proliferation through inducing apoptosis and autophagy via MAPK activation in glioma. However, the mechanism of luteolin on suppressing lung cancer growth is still unclear. We found that luteolin targeted LIMK1 from the in silico screening and significantly inhibited the LIMK1 kinase activity, which was confirmed with pull-down binding assay and computational docking models. Treatment with luteolin inhibited lung cancer cells anchorage-independent colony growth and induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at G1 phase. Luteolin also decreased the expression of cyclin D1 and increased the levels of cleaved caspase-3 by down-regulating LIMK1 signalling related targets, including p-LIMK and p-cofilin. Furthermore, luteolin suppressed the lung cancer patient-derived xenograft tumour growth by decreasing Ki-67, p-LIMK and p-cofilin expression in vivo. Taken together, these results provide insight into the mechanism that underlies the anticancer effects of luteolin on lung cancer, which involved in down-regulation of LIMK1 and its interaction with cofilin. It also provides valuable evidence for translation towards lung cancer clinical trials with luteolin.     

Amniotic membrane-derived cells inhibit proliferation of cancer cell lines by inducing cell cycle arrest

Cells derived from the amniotic foetal membrane of human term placenta have drawn particular attention mainly for their plasticity and immunological properties, which render them interesting for stem-cell research and cell-based therapeutic applications. In particular, we have previously demonstrated that amniotic mesenchymal tissue cells (AMTC) inhibit lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and suppress the generation and maturation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Here, we show that AMTC also significantly reduce the proliferation of cancer cell lines of haematopoietic and non-haematopoietic origin, in both cell-cell contact and transwell co-cultures, therefore suggesting the involvement of yet-unknown inhibitory soluble factor(s) in this 'cell growth restraint'. Importantly, we provide evidence that the anti-proliferative effect of AMTC is associated with induction of cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase. Gene expression analyses demonstrate that AMTC can down-regulate cancer cells' mRNA expression of genes associated with cell cycle progression, such as cyclins (cyclin D2, cyclin E1, cyclin H) and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK4, CDK6 and CDK2), whilst they up-regulate cell cycle negative regulator such as p15 and p21, consistent with a block in G0/G1 phase with no progression to S phase. Taken together, these findings warrant further studies to investigate the applicability of these cells for controlling cancer cell proliferation in vivo.     

S100B promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of specific brain metastatic lung adenocarcinoma cell line

Brain metastasis frequently occurs in cancer patients and is associated with a poor prognosis. We previously reported that S100B was highly expressed in PC14/B, a specific brain metastatic lung adenocarcinoma cell line, which suggests that it is associated with brain metastasis of lung cancer. However, the role of S100B in brain metastasis remains to be elucidated. In this study, using PC14/B cell line, we found that siRNA mediated depletion of S100B in PC14/B cells led to notable differences in cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, colony formation ability, cell migratory and invasive activity compared with the mock-transfected cells. Therefore, our data suggest that S100B promotes the brain metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma by promoting cell proliferation, preventing apoptosis and increasing cell migration and invasion.     

Cyclin gene expression and growth control in normal and neoplastic human breast epithelium

Recent advances in defining the molecular mechanisms of cell cycle control in eukaryotes provide a basis for beter understanding the hormonal control of cell proliferation in normal and neoplastic breast epithelium. It is now clear that a number of critical steps in cell cycle progression are controlled by families of serine/threonine kinases, the cdks. These kinases are activated by interactions with various cyclin gene products which form the regulatory subunits of the kinase complexes. Several families of cyclins control cell cycle progression in G₁ phase, cyclins C, D and E, or in S, G₂ and mitosis, cyclins A and B. Recent studies have defined the expression and regulation of cyclin genes in normal breast epithelial cells and in breast cancer cell lines. Following growth arrest of T-47D breast cancer cells by serum deprivation restimulation with insulin results in sequential induction of cyclin genes. Cyclin D1 mRNA increases within 1 h of mitogenic stimulation and is followed by increased expression of cyclins D3 and E in G₁ phase, cyclin A in late G₁/early S phase and cyclin B1 in G₂. Similar results were observed following epidermal growth factor stimulation of normal breast epithelial cells. Other hormones—oestrogens and progestins—and growth factors—insulin-like investigated for their effects on G₁ cyclin gene expression. In all cases there was an excellent correlation between the induction of cyclin D1 mRNA and subsequent entry into S phase. Furthermore, growth inhibition by antioestrogens and concurrent G₁ arrest were preceded by an acute decrease in cyclin D1 gene expression. These observations suggest a likely role for cyclin D1 in mediating many of the known hormonal effects on cell proliferation in breast epithelial cells.     

Identification of G1 kinase activity for cdk6, a novel cyclin D partner.

A family of vertebrate cdc2-related kinases has been identified, and these kinases are candidates for roles in cell cycle regulation. Here, we show that the human PLSTIRE gene product is a novel cyclin-dependent kinase, cdk6. The cdk6 kinase is associated with cyclins D1, D2, and D3 in lysates of human cells and is activated by coexpression with D-type cyclins in Sf9 insect cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that endogenous cdk6 from human cell extracts is an active kinase which can phosphorylate pRB, the product of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene. The activation of cdk6 kinase occurs during mid-G1 in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated T cells, well prior to the activation of cdk2 kinase. This timing suggests that cdk6, and by analogy its homolog cdk4, links growth factor stimulation with the onset of cell cycle progression.     

TFPI‐2 silencing increases tumour progression and promotes metalloproteinase 1 and 3 induction through tumour‐stromal cell interactions

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor‐2 (TFPI‐2) is a potent inhibitor of plasmin which activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) involved in degradation of the extracellular matrix. Its secretion in the tumour microenvironment makes TFPI‐2 a potential inhibitor of tumour invasion and metastasis. As demonstrated in aggressive cancers, TFPI‐2 is frequently down‐regulated in cancer cells, but the mechanisms involved in the inhibition of tumour progression remained unclear. We showed in this study that stable TFPI‐2 down‐regulation in the National Cancer Institute (NCI)‐H460 non‐small cell lung cancer cell line using specific micro interfering micro‐interfering RNA promoted tumour progression in a nude mice orthotopic model that resulted in an increase in cell invasion. Moreover, TFPI‐2 down‐regulation enhanced cell adhesion to collagen IV and laminin via an increase in α₁ integrin on cell surface, and increased MMP expression (mainly MMP‐1 and ‐3) contributing to cancer cell invasion through basement membrane components. This study also reveals for the first time that pulmonary fibroblasts incubated with conditioned media from TFPI‐2 silencing cancer cells exhibited increased expression of MMPs, particularly MMP‐1, ‐3 and ‐7, that are likely involved in lung cancer cell invasion through the surrounding stromal tissue, thus enhancing formation of metastases.     

TBC1 domain family member 23 interacts with Ras-related protein Rab-11A to promote poor prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer via β1-integrin

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of lung cancer cases. TBC1D23, a member of the TBC/RABGAP family, is widely expressed in human tissues; however, its role in NSCLC is currently unknown. Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted on 173 paraffin-embedded lung tissue sections from patients with NSCLC from 2014 to 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. MTT, colony formation assay, cell cycle assay, scratch assay, transwell assay, Western blotting and real-time PCR were employed on multiple NSCLC cell lines modified to knock down or overexpress TBC1D23/RAB11A. Immunoprecipitation, immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, immunofluorescence and flow cytometry were performed to explore the interaction between TBC1D23 and RAB11A and TBC1D23 involvement in the interaction between RAB11A and β1 integrin in the para-nucleus. TBC1D23 was correlated with tumour size, differentiation degree, metastasis, TNM stage and poor prognosis. TBC1D23 was involved in the interaction between RAB11A and β1 integrin in the para-nucleus, thus activating the β1 integrin/FAK/ERK signalling pathway to promote NSCLC. Furthermore, TBC1D23 promoted NSCLC progression by inducing cell proliferation, migration and invasion. This study indicated the relationship between TBC1D23 expression and the adverse clinicopathological characteristics of patients with NSCLC, suggesting that TBC1D23 may be an important target for NSCLC treatment.