Silicone gel infiltration of a peripheral nerve and constrictive neuropathy following rupture of a breast prosthesis.

Following rupture of a subpectoral breast prosthesis, massive amounts of silicone gel migrated into the arm of a patient. The patient developed painful paresthesias and decreased sensation in the cutaneous distribution of the superficial radial nerve. Nerve conduction studies showed both an increase in distal latency and decreased amplitude in this nerve compared with the normal opposite side. Subsequent neurolysis confirmed dense fibrosis surrounding the nerve. Silicone droplets also were observed within the thickened epineurium of the median nerve, but no electrophysiologic evidence of neuropathy occurred. Multiple debridements of the subcutaneous tissue of the arm were necessary. In one of these specimens, histologic sections demonstrated silicone gel infiltration of a subcutaneous nerve. This is the first reported case of silicone gel infiltration of a nerve and constrictive neuropathy associated with a prosthesis rupture.     

Self-reported diseases and symptoms by rupture status among unselected Danish women with cosmetic silicone breast implants

Epidemiologic evidence does not support an association between silicone breast implants and connective tissue or other rheumatic diseases. However, a recent study has suggested that women with ruptured implants may be at increased risk of developing fibromyalgia. An analysis of adverse health outcomes according to breast implant rupture status was conducted in 238 unselected Danish women with cosmetic silicone breast implants. Ninety-two of the women had definite implant rupture, and 146 had intact implants as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Before undergoing imaging, the women provided blood samples and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Women with ruptured implants overall, and the subgroup with extracapsular ruptures (n = 23), were compared with women with intact implants regarding a number of self-reported diseases and symptoms and the presence of specific autoantibodies, such as antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and cardiolipin immunoglobulin G and M antibodies. Overall, there were no differences in the occurrence of self-reported diseases or symptoms or in the presence of autoantibodies between women with intact implants and women with ruptured implants, including extracapsular rupture. The only exception was capsular contracture, which was reported six times more frequently by women with extracapsular ruptures than by women with intact implants (OR, 6.3; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 23.5). In conclusion, this study of unselected women with silicone breast implants could establish no association between silicone implant rupture and specific diseases or symptoms related to connective tissue disease or other rheumatic conditions, except for an excess of capsular contracture among women with extracapsular rupture.     

Untreated silicone breast implant rupture

Implant rupture is a well-known complication of breast implant surgery that can pass unnoticed by both patient and physician. To date, no prospective study has addressed the possible health implications of silicone breast implant rupture. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether untreated ruptures are associated with changes over time in magnetic resonance imaging findings, serologic markers, or self-reported breast symptoms. A baseline magnetic resonance imaging examination was performed in 1999 on 271 women who were randomly chosen from a larger cohort of women having cosmetic breast implants for a median period of 12 years (range, 3 to 25 years). A follow-up magnetic resonance imaging examination was carried out in 2001, excluding women who underwent explantation in the period between the two magnetic resonance imaging examinations (n = 44). On the basis of these examinations, the authors identified 64 women who had at least one ruptured implant at the first magnetic resonance imaging examination and, for comparison, all women who had intact implants at both examinations (n = 98). Magnetic resonance images from the two examinations were compared and changes in rupture configuration were evaluated. Comparisons were also made for self-reported breast symptoms occurring during the study period and for changes in serum values of antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and cardiolipin antibodies immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M. The majority of the women with implant rupture had no visible magnetic resonance imaging changes of their ruptured implants. For 11 implants (11 percent) in 10 women, the authors observed progression of silicone seepage, either as a conversion from intracapsular into extracapsular rupture (n = 7), as progression of extra-capsular silicone (n = 3), or as increasing herniation of the silicone within the fibrous capsule (n = 1); however, in most cases, these changes were minor. Some changes could be ascribed to trauma, but others seemed spontaneous. There was no increase in levels of autoantibodies during the study period in either study group. Women with untreated implant ruptures reported a significant increase in nonspecific breast changes (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 3.8) compared with women without ruptures. On the basis of this first study of women with untreated silicone breast implant rupture, the authors conclude that implant rupture is a relatively harmless condition, which only rarely progresses and gives rise to notable symptoms. Even so, because of a small risk of silicone spread, the authors suggest that women with implant ruptures be followed clinically, if not operated on. Because implant ruptures often occur asymptomatically, any woman with silicone implants, regardless of rupture status, should be evaluated at regular intervals.     

The diagnosis of ruptured breast implants

This study is a retrospective review of 18 patients treated by the authors and 14 reported patients with ruptured breast implants. A history of trauma was absent in 11 patients; 17 patients had closed capsulotomies. The physical findings of ruptured implants were nodules, decreased breast size, asymmetry, tenderness, and a softer texture. Mammograms were 90 percent accurate when silicone had migrated. In seven of eight false-negative mammograms, silicone was contained within the fibrous capsule. Mammography signs of rupture are summarized. The diagnosis of ruptured implants should be facilitated by recognition of the clinical presentations and radiographic signs.     

Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacies of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography in implant rupture detection and to illustrate pitfalls in MR image interpretation. Thirty patients referred by plastic surgeons with suspected breast implant rupture were prospectively evaluated using MR, ultrasonography, and mammography. Imaging examinations were interpreted independently and blindly for implant rupture and correlated to operative findings. Surgical correlation in 16 patients (53 percent) with 31 implants showed 13 (42 percent) were intact, 5 (16 percent) had severe gel bleed, and 13 (42 percent) were ruptured. MR sensitivity was 100 percent and specificity was 63 percent. Accuracy for rupture was 81 percent with MR, higher than with ultrasonography and mammography (77 and 59 percent, respectively). We describe a specific pitfall in MR interpretation, the "rat-tail" sign, composed of a medial linear extension of silicone along the chest wall. Seen in eight cases (four intact, three ruptures, one gel bleed), the rat-tail sign may lead to misdiagnosis of implant rupture if seen in isolation. Magnetic resonance imaging is more accurate and sensitive than ultrasonography and mammography in detecting breast implant rupture. We describe a new sign (rat-tail sign) composed of medial compression of the implant simulating silicone extrusion as a potential false-positive MR finding for rupture. This article presents clinical experience with magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of implant rupture and defines and illustrates potential pitfalls of MR interpretation, including the new rat-tail sign.     

Histologic changes and silicone concentrations in human breast tissue surrounding silicone breast prostheses

Using a previously developed method for quantitative measurements of silicone concentrations in breast tissue, material from 86 biopsies from 67 breasts in 55 patients who had silicone implants was examined. In the 49 breast with unruptured prostheses, there was a positive relation between the concentrations and inflammatory reactions, the only exception being the amount of plasma cells, which showed a negative relation. It is concluded that silicone prostheses provoke an inflammatory response not only because they act as foreign bodies, but also because of silicone seepage through intact membranes.     

Decision and management algorithms to address patient and food and drug administration concerns regarding breast augmentation and implants

During the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's advisory panel hearings to evaluate the premarket approval for conventional silicone gel implants on October 14 and 15, 2003, panel members and patient advocate representatives focused on four specific areas of concern: reoperation rates in primary breast augmentation; levels, depth, and methods of patient education and informed consent; modes, frequency, and management of silicone gel implant device failures, including management of "silent" ruptures; and methods of monitoring and managing symptoms or symptom complexes that may or may not be associated with connective tissue disease or other undefined symptom complexes. These concerns, with a reported 20 percent reoperation rate for primary augmentation within just 3 years, and a lack of concise, definitive management protocols addressing these areas of concern may have contributed to the Food and Drug Administration's rejection of the premarket approval, despite the panel's recommendation for approval. This article presents decision and management algorithms that have been used successfully for 7 years in a busy breast augmentation practice (Tebbetts and Tebbetts). The algorithms have been further expanded and refined by a group of surgeons with diverse experiences and expertise to address the following clinical situations that coincide with concerns expressed by patients and the Food and Drug Administration: implant size exchange, grade III to IV capsular contracture, infection, stretch deformities (implant bottoming or displacement), silent rupture of gel implants, and undefined symptom complexes (connective tissue disease or other). In one practice (Tebbetts and Tebbetts) that uses the TEPID system (tissue characteristics of the envelope, parenchyma, and implant and the dimensions and fill distribution dynamics of the implant), implant selection is based on quantified patient tissue characteristics, pocket selection is based on quantified soft-tissue coverage, and anatomic saline implants have fill volumes that are designed to minimize shell collapse and fold fatigue; in this practice, the algorithms contributed to a 3 percent overall reoperation rate in 1662 reported cases with up to 7 years of follow-up, compared with a 20 percent reoperation rate at 3 years in the 2003 premarket approval study.     

Analysis of silicon in human tissues with special reference to silicone breast implants

The increase, in the last two decades, in the application of silicones (polysiloxanes) and inorganic silicon compounds in medicine and the food industry, has exposed the human body to extensive contacts with these substances. Most silicone breast implants contain a gel consisting of a crosslinked silicone elastomer swollen by silicone oil (PDMS). Diffusion of PDMS through the silicone elastomer envelope and rupture of the envelope with release of the gel contents both occur clinically. The amount and distribution of silicone compounds in various tissues are key issues in the assessment of health problems connected with silicone implants. We have measured by GFAAS the Si content of tissues from normal and implant patients and the organic solvent extractable Si levels (assumed to be silicone), using careful control of sample collection and preparation. Whole blood levels were: implant patients mean 38.8 (SD 25.6) (microg/kg), controls mean 24.2 (SD 26.7) (microg/kg) in one study and subsequently 103.8 (SD 112.1) and 74.3 (SD 86.5) (microg/kg) in another study. Capsular tissue levels were: gel implants 25047 (SD 39313) (mg/kg of dry tissue), saline implants 20.0 (SD 27.3) (mg/kg of dry tissue) and controls 0.24 (SD 0.39) (mg/kg of dry tissue). Breast milk levels were: implant patients mean 58.7 (SD 33.8) (microg/kg), controls mean 51.1 (SD 31.0) (microg/kg); infant formula mean was 4.40 (mg/kg). Various precautions were undertaken to avoid Si contamination in this work, the most important being a) the use of a Class 100 laboratory for sample preparation and b) application of strict and elaborate washing procedure for specimen collection tools and laboratory plasticware. This data demonstrated that to properly interpret the importance of these numbers for human health, a larger study of "normal" levels of Si in human tissues should be undertaken and factors such as diet, water, race and geographical location should be considered.     

The biophysical and histologic properties of capsules formed by smooth and textured silicone implants in the rabbit.

Capsular contracture remains the major complication of reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a silicone implant with a textured surface will form a capsule of significantly different biophysical and histologic properties than conventional smooth silicone. Thirty smooth and 30 textured silicone tissue expanders were implanted under the panniculus carnosus of rabbits. After 3 months, measurements related to contracture were performed on anesthetized animals in an investigator-blinded, controlled manner. Intraexpander pressures were measured as saline was injected over time. We found a significant correlation between intraexpander pressures, applanation tonometry, and Baker class. Histology revealed a thicker, more adherent, and inflammatory capsule around the textured silicone implants as compared with the smooth silicone implants. Dynamic pressures were plotted against volume of saline within the two types of implants. Statistical analysis revealed that the textured implants form a tighter and thicker capsule than the smooth implants after 3 months of observation (p less than 0.005).     

Elevated serum silicon levels in women with silicone gel breast implants

The metatolic fate of silicone gel leaked from an intact or ruptured prosthesis is unknown. In this study, serum was blindly assayed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) for elemental silicon in 72 women with silicone gel breast implants and 55 control women (mean age 48 yr, both groups). Blood was drawn and processed using silicon-free materials. The mean silicon level in controls was 0.13±0.07 mg/L (range 0.06–0.35 mg/L), whereas in implant patients, the mean was significantly higher at 0.28±0.22 mg/L (range 0.06–0.87 mg/L) (P<0.01, Student'st-test with correction for unequal variances). Using the mean of the control group +2 SD as a cutoff for normal range (0.27 mg/L), 25/72 (34.7%) implant patients exceeded this value, compared with 2/55 (3.6%) controls. There was no significant correlation between past rupture of one or both implants, current rupture at the time of the blood draw, or the number of years with implants and silicon levels. The results suggest that serum silicon levels are elevated in many women with silicone gel breast implants. The chemical species involved and kinetics of this elevation remain to be determined.     

Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty

The earliest silicone breast implants were smooth-surface, silicone rubber devices filled with either silicone gel or saline. Because of persistent problems with capsular contracture, polyurethane-covered silicone implants were developed as an alternative. Particularly in the short run, these alternatives proved highly successful at reducing the incidence of capsular contracture. By 1990, polyurethane-covered implants were rapidly becoming the preferred implant choice of many plastic surgeons, but for legal, regulatory, financial, and safety reasons they were withdrawn from the market by Bristol-Myers in 1991. Meanwhile, during the late 1980s, surface texturing and improved materials became available on other silicone breast implants and expanders. Most studies suggest that textured-surface silicone gel-filled implants, saline-filled implants, and tissue expanders have less frequent capsular contracture than their smooth-surface counterparts.     

Radiolucent prosthetic gel.

The successful use of silicone breast implants is complicated by their interference with mammography. We have evaluated clinically available implant filling materials and found that a new Bio-Oncotic gel approximates the radiolucency of normal breast tissue. Silicone implants completely obscure areas of the breast in mammography. Recently proposed as a filler material, peanut oil is significantly more radiolucent than normal tissue. Physiologic saline solution compares favorably as a tissue-density-simulating substance. However, saline's lack of lubricating properties results in leakage, making it less than optimal. Bio-Oncotic gel is biologically compatible. We conclude that this gel is the most appropriate filler for breast prostheses. Clinical studies are indicated.     

Label‐free stimulated Raman scattering imaging reveals silicone breast implant material in tissue

Millions of women worldwide have silicone breast implants. It has been reported that implant failure occurs in approximately a tenth of patients within 10 years, and the consequences of dissemination of silicone debris are poorly understood. Currently, silicone detection in histopathological slides is based on morphological features as no specific immunohistochemical technique is available. Here, we show the feasibility and sensitivity of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging to specifically detect silicone material in stained histopathological slides, without additional sample treatment. Histology slides of four periprosthetic capsules from different implant types were obtained after explantation, as well as an enlarged axillary lymph node from a patient with a ruptured implant. SRS images coregistered with bright‐field images revealed the distribution and quantity of silicone material in the tissue. Fast and high‐resolution imaging of histology slides with molecular specificity using SRS provides an opportunity to investigate the role of silicone debris in the pathophysiology of implant‐linked diseases.     

PHEMA as a fibrous capsule-resistant breast prosthesis

The presence of a silicone (poly-dimethyl siloxane) breast prosthesis in a breast reconstruction patient typically leads to fibrous tissue encapsulation of the prosthesis. Fibrous capsular contracture forces the prosthesis into a hardened sphere. The initially satisfactory cosmetic result can thus be changed into a deformed mass of inappropriate compliance. It is the author's hope with the present study to identify a material for implantation with a diminished tendency to form fibrous encapsulation, to improve the long-term results of prosthetic implants. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the early capsule production quality of poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (PHEMA) and poly-dimethyl siloxane (silicone). Each of five rats subcutaneously underwent implantation with both a disk of poly-dimethyl siloxane (control) and a similar disk of PHEMA. In this study, the extent of fibrous encapsulation was assessed at 6 weeks after implantation of the two disk types. The five disks of poly-dimethyl siloxane were embedded in fibrous tissue, whereas there was no apparent fibrous tissue surrounding the implants of PHEMA. The author concludes that the results for PHEMA were superior to those for silicone at 6 weeks with regard to fibrous encapsulation (p = 0.0312).     

Histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of capsular synovial metaplasias that form around silicone breast implants

Metaplasia is a reversible phenomenon that usually occurs in response to chronic irritation and/or inflammation. It allows for the substitution of fragile cells with those that are better able to survive under various circumstances. Our study aims to describe the histology of one unusual type of metaplasia results in the formation of a synovial-like membrane typical of joints inside a female patient’s breasts around silicone implants. We analyzed samples from 22 female patients, who underwent delayed-staged breast reconstructions. Attention was paid especially to tissue that was in direct contact with the silicone expander and that was under permanent pressure and friction between the implant and the surrounding tissue. Biopsies of explanted periprosthetic capsules were processed for examination by light microscopy. Immunohistochemical staining (ten different primary antibodies) was performed to examine a variety of cell-specific antigens. At the interface between the tissue capsule and the silicone breast expander, we typically observed a 50–200-μm cellular lining. Thanks to the high cellular density, this cellular layer resembled epithelium. However, there was no basement membrane, and cells were negative for cytokeratin. The cells forming the superficial layer were strongly positive for vimentin and podoplanin and weakly positive for the S100 protein. These cells did not express desmin or smooth muscle actin. Within the most superficial layer (synovial intima), we distinguished two types of cells: phagocytic (CD68-positive) and fibroblast-like synovial cells. We conclude that the cellular lining surrounding silicone breast implants looks like a true synovial membrane resembling a fibrous form of synovium.     

A review of psychological outcomes and suicide in aesthetic breast augmentation

Aesthetic surgery is an essential component of plastic surgery and has become increasingly popular in American society. In 2002, 1.8 million surgical cosmetic procedures were performed in the United States, representing a 294 percent increase from 1992. The 1992 U.S. Food and Drug Administration moratorium on silicone breast implants arose in response to numerous reports of connective tissue disease associated with silicone gel breast augmentation and has led to a decade-long battle over the safety of silicone breast implants that continues today. Numerous scientific and epidemiologic studies of the past decade have established that there is no association between silicone breast prostheses and systemic disease. Recently, a new front has opened in the conflict regarding the safety of breast augmentation: the psychological impact of breast augmentation. Quality studies assessing the psychological characteristics of breast augmentation patients and the psychological impact of breast augmentation surgery are few and most studies are flawed in their methods. Recent reports have provided corroborating evidence to support the psychological benefits of cosmetic surgery and breast augmentation. New reports citing an increased risk for suicide among women with breast implants have brought renewed concerns but are unable to demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship between breast implants and suicide. The present challenge is to determine whether the increased risk reported in epidemiologic studies is falsely associated with breast implants or whether it represents underlying risk factors or psychopathology in women undergoing breast augmentation that puts them at increased risk for suicide. The purpose of this article is to review the literature regarding the psychological impact of breast augmentation and assesses current scientific findings, with emphasis on the validity of suicide risk in breast augmentation patients.     

Prevalence of silicone breast implant rupture among Danish women

The durability of silicone gel-filled breast implants is of concern, but there are few epidemiological studies on this issue. To date, most of the relevant findings are derived from studies of explantation, which suffer from bias by including women with symptoms or concerns about their implants. As part of a long-term magnetic resonance imaging study of the incidence of rupture, this study involved 271 women with 533 cosmetic breast implants who were randomly selected from among women who underwent cosmetic breast implantation from 1973 through 1997 at one public and three private plastic-surgery clinics in Denmark. The prevalence of rupture was determined from the first magnetic resonance screening. The images were evaluated by four independent readers, using a standardized, validated form. The outcomes under study were rupture, possible rupture, and intact implant. Ruptures were categorized as intracapsular or extracapsular. Overall, 26 percent of implants in 36 percent of the women examined were found to be ruptured, and an additional 6 percent were possibly ruptured. Of the ruptured implants, 22 percent were extracapsular. In multiple regression analyses, age of implant was significantly associated with rupture among second- and third-generation implants, with a 12-fold increased prevalence odds ratio for rupture of implants that were between 16 and 20 years of age, compared with implants between 3 and 5 years of age. Surgitek implants (Medical Engineering Corporation, Racine, Wis.) had a significantly increased prevalence odds ratio of 2.6 for rupture, compared with the reference implants. No significant association was found with the position (subglandular or submuscular) or the type of implant (single- or double-lumen). Extracapsular ruptures were significantly associated with a history of closed capsulotomy (p = 0.001). In the future, the authors plan to examine the women in their cohort with a second magnetic resonance imaging scan to establish the incidence of rupture, a parameter unknown to date in the literature, and to further characterize those factors associated with the actual risk of rupture.     

Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants.

An investigation, by scanning electron microscopy of the capsules formed around silicone breast implants revealed that they consist almost entirely of connective tissue. In contrast, the capsules around the Y-prostheses (with a polyurethane foam surface) showed a foreign body reaction. We believe that excessive capsule formation around silicone implants is, among other factors, most likely due to discrete or moderate bleeding with subsequent hematoma formation. Therefore, we favor a two-stage procedure for subcutaneous mastectomy with insertion of the implant at 4 to 6 months after the excision.     

Biodurability of retrieved silicone gel breast implants

This study analyzed the shells of single-lumen silicone gel breast implants within the general context of device durability in vivo. The investigation included the major types of gel-filled implants that were manufactured in the United States in a 30-year period. The implants analyzed were Cronin seamed (two explants and one control), Silastic 0 and Silastic I (18 explants and seven controls), and Silastic II (22 explants and 43 controls). The biodurability of the explants was investigated with measurements of the mechanical and chemical properties of the various types of silicone gel control and explanted shells, with implantation times ranging from 3 months to 32 years. The shell properties measured for the controls and explants included the stress-strain relationships, tensile strength, elongation, tear resistance, moduli, cross-link density, and amount of extractable material in the shell. In addition, the mechanical properties of shells that had been extracted with hexane were analyzed for both explants and control implants. The silicone gel explants investigated in this study included some of the oldest explants of the various major types that have been tested to date. For assessment of long-term implantation effects, the data obtained in this study were combined with all known data from other institutions on the various major types of gel implants. The study also addressed the failure mechanisms associated with silicone gel breast implants. The results of the study demonstrated that silicone gel implants have remained intact for 32 years in vivo and that degradation of the shell mechanical and chemical properties is not a primary mechanism for silicone gel breast implant failure.