Targeting of proteins to mitochondria

A clear picture has emerged over the past years on how a 'classic' mitochondrial protein, like subunit IV of cytochrome c oxidase, might be targeted to mitochondria. The targeting and subsequent import process involves the commitment of the TOM (translocase in the outer mitochondrial membrane) receptor complex on the mitochondrial surface, a TIM (translocase in the inner mitochondrial membrane) translocation complex in the mitochondrial inner membrane, and assorted chaperones and processing enzymes within the organelle. Recent work suggests that while very many mitochondrial precursor proteins might follow this basic targeting pathway, a large number have further requirements if they are to be successfully imported. These include ribosome-associated factors and soluble factors in the cytosol, soluble factors in the mitochondrial intermembrane space, an additional TIM translocase in the inner membrane and a range of narrow specificity assembly factors in the inner membrane. This review is focused on the targeting of proteins up to the stage at which they enter the TOM complex in the outer membrane.     

Role of membrane contact sites in protein import into mitochondria

Mitochondria import more than 1,000 different proteins from the cytosol. The proteins are synthesized as precursors on cytosolic ribosomes and are translocated by protein transport machineries of the mitochondrial membranes. Five main pathways for protein import into mitochondria have been identified. Most pathways use the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) as the entry gate into mitochondria. Depending on specific signals contained in the precursors, the proteins are subsequently transferred to different intramitochondrial translocases. In this article, we discuss the connection between protein import and mitochondrial membrane architecture. Mitochondria possess two membranes. It is a long‐standing question how contact sites between outer and inner membranes are formed and which role the contact sites play in the translocation of precursor proteins. A major translocation contact site is formed between the TOM complex and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane (TIM23 complex), promoting transfer of presequence‐carrying preproteins to the mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix. Recent findings led to the identification of contact sites that involve the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) of the inner membrane. MICOS plays a dual role. It is crucial for maintaining the inner membrane cristae architecture and forms contacts sites to the outer membrane that promote translocation of precursor proteins into the intermembrane space and outer membrane of mitochondria. The view is emerging that the mitochondrial protein translocases do not function as independent units, but are embedded in a network of interactions with machineries that control mitochondrial activity and architecture.     

Mitochondria use different mechanisms for transport of multispanning membrane proteins through the intermembrane space

The mitochondrial inner membrane contains numerous multispanning integral proteins. The precursors of these hydrophobic proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and therefore have to cross the mitochondrial outer membrane and intermembrane space to reach the inner membrane. While the import pathways of noncleavable multispanning proteins, such as the metabolite carriers, have been characterized in detail by the generation of translocation intermediates, little is known about the mechanism by which cleavable preproteins of multispanning proteins, such as Oxa1, are transferred from the outer membrane to the inner membrane. We have identified a translocation intermediate of the Oxa1 preprotein in the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) and found that there are differences from the import mechanisms of carrier proteins. The intermembrane space domain of the receptor Tom22 supports the stabilization of the Oxa1 intermediate. Transfer of the Oxa1 preprotein to the inner membrane is not affected by inactivation of the soluble TIM complexes. Both the inner membrane potential and matrix heat shock protein 70 are essential to release the preprotein from the TOM complex, suggesting a close functional cooperation of the TOM complex and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane. We conclude that mitochondria employ different mechanisms for translocation of multispanning proteins across the aqueous intermembrane space.     

Mechanisms of protein translocation into mitochondria.

Mitochondrial biogenesis utilizes a complex proteinaceous machinery for the import of cytosolically synthesized preproteins. At least three large multisubunit protein complexes, one in the outer membrane and two in the inner membrane, have been identified. These translocase complexes cooperate with soluble proteins from the cytosol, the intermembrane space and the matrix. The translocation of presequence-containing preproteins through the outer membrane channel includes successive electrostatic interactions of the charged mitochondrial targeting sequence with a chain of import components. Translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane utilizes the energy of the proton motive force of the inner membrane and the hydrolysis of ATP. The matrix chaperone system of the mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 forms an ATP-dependent import motor by interaction with the polypeptide chain in transit and components of the inner membrane translocase. The precursors of integral inner membrane proteins of the metabolite carrier family interact with newly identified import components of the intermembrane space and are inserted into the inner membrane by a second translocase complex. A comparison of the full set of import components between the yeast Sacccharomyces cerevisiae and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrates an evolutionary conservation of most components of the mitochondrial import machinery with a possible greater divergence for the import pathway of the inner membrane carrier proteins.     

Mechanisms of protein translocation into mitochondria

Mitochondrial biogenesis utilizes a complex proteinaceous machinery for the import of cytosolically synthesized preproteins. At least three large multisubunit protein complexes, one in the outer membrane and two in the inner membrane, have been identified. These translocase complexes cooperate with soluble proteins from the cytosol, the intermembrane space and the matrix. The translocation of presequence-containing preproteins through the outer membrane channel includes successive electrostatic interactions of the charged mitochondrial targeting sequence with a chain of import components. Translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane utilizes the energy of the proton motive force of the inner membrane and the hydrolysis of ATP. The matrix chaperone system of the mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 forms an ATP-dependent import motor by interaction with the polypeptide chain in transit and components of the inner membrane translocase. The precursors of integral inner membrane proteins of the metabolite carrier family interact with newly identified import components of the intermembrane space and are inserted into the inner membrane by a second translocase complex. A comparison of the full set of import components between the yeast Sacccharomyces cerevisiae and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrates an evolutionary conservation of most components of the mitochondrial import machinery with a possible greater divergence for the import pathway of the inner membrane carrier proteins.     

Disruption of the gene for Hsp30, an alpha-crystallin-related heat shock protein of Neurospora crassa, causes defects in import of proteins into mitochondria

The gene for Hsp30, the only known alpha-crystallin-related heat shock protein of Neurospora crassa, was disrupted by repeat-induced point mutagenesis, leading to loss of cell survival at high temperature. Hsp30, which is not synthesized at 30 degrees C, associates reversibly with the mitochondria at high temperature (45 degrees C). In this study, we found that import of selected proteins into internal compartments of mitochondria, following their synthesis in the cytosol, was severely impaired at high temperature in a strain mutant in Hsp30. After 70 min of cell incubation at 45 degrees C, most matrix, inner membrane, and intermembrane-space proteins tested were reduced in import by about 50-70% in the mutant, as compared to wild-type cells. In contrast, assembly of selected proteins into the outer mitochondrial membrane was not reduced, except for one component of the preprotein translocase complex of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Three proteins of this complex co-immunoprecipitated with Hsp30 of wild-type cells incubated at 45 degrees C. We propose that Hsp30 interacts with the preprotein translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane and that it chaperones the activity of one or more components of this translocase complex at high temperature.     

The J domain-related cochaperone Tim16 is a constituent of the mitochondrial TIM23 preprotein translocase

Mitochondria import the vast majority of their proteins from the cytosol. The mitochondrial import motor of the TIM23 translocase drives the translocation of precursor proteins across the outer and inner membrane in an ATP-dependent reaction. Tim44 at the inner face of the translocation pore recruits the chaperone mtHsp70, which binds the incoming precursor protein. This reaction is assisted by the cochaperones Tim14 and Mge1. We have identified a novel essential cochaperone, Tim16. It is related to J-domain proteins and forms a stable subcomplex with the J protein Tim14. Depletion of Tim16 has a marked effect on protein import into the mitochondrial matrix, impairs the interaction of Tim14 with the TIM23 complex and leads to severe structural changes of the import motor. In conclusion, Tim16 is a constituent of the TIM23 preprotein translocase, where it exerts crucial functions in the import motor.     

tRNA import across the mitochondrial inner membrane in T. brucei requires TIM subunits but is independent of protein import

Mitochondrial tRNA import is widespread, but mechanistic insights of how tRNAs are translocated across mitochondrial membranes remain scarce. The parasitic protozoan T. brucei lacks mitochondrial tRNA genes. Consequently, it imports all organellar tRNAs from the cytosol. Here we investigated the connection between tRNA and protein translocation across the mitochondrial inner membrane. Trypanosomes have a single inner membrane protein translocase that consists of three heterooligomeric submodules, which all are required for import of matrix proteins. In vivo depletion of individual submodules shows that surprisingly only the integral membrane core module, including the protein import pore, but not the presequence-associated import motor are required for mitochondrial tRNA import. Thus we could uncouple import of matrix proteins from import of tRNAs even though both substrates are imported into the same mitochondrial subcompartment. This is reminiscent to the outer membrane where the main protein translocase but not on-going protein translocation is required for tRNA import. We also show that import of tRNAs across the outer and inner membranes are coupled to each other. Taken together, these data support the ‘alternate import model’, which states that tRNA and protein import while mechanistically independent use the same translocation pores but not at the same time.     

Proline residues of transmembrane domains determine the sorting of inner membrane proteins in mitochondria

Most inner membrane proteins of mitochondria are synthesized in the cytosol and reach the inner membrane using one of two alternative sorting pathways. On the stop transfer route, proteins are arrested during import at the level of the inner membrane. The conservative sorting pathway involves translocation through the inner membrane and insertion from the matrix. It is unclear how the translocase of the inner membrane 23 protein translocation machinery differentiates between the two classes of proteins. Here we show that proline residues in hydrophobic stretches strongly disfavor the translocation arrest of transmembrane domains (TMDs) and favor the transfer of preproteins to the matrix. We propose that proline residues, together with the hydrophobicity of the TMD and the presence of charged residues COOH-terminally flanking the TMD, are determinants of the intramitochondrial sorting of inner membrane proteins.     

Mitochondrial protein biogenesis: The essential functions of chaperones and their cofactors during preprotein translocation

Most mitochondrial proteins have to be imported from the cytosol through both mitochondrial membranes to their final localization. A dedicated translocation machinery is responsible for the specific recognition and the membrane transport of mitochondrial precursor proteins. Protein translocase complexes integrated into both mitochondrial membranes cooperate closely with receptor proteins at the surface and provide aqueous transport channels through the membranes. Energy for the membrane insertion is provided by the electric potential across the mitochondrial inner membrane. However, full translocation of the polypeptide chain requires ATP hydrolysis in the matrix. The responsible ATPase enzyme is a member of an ubiquitous family of molecular chaperones, the mitochondrial heat shock protein of 70 kDa (mtHsp70). A physical and functional interaction with a set of cofactors is indispensable for the translocation function of mtHsp70. By a specific and nucleotide-dependent binding to the inner membrane translocase component Tim44, the soluble chaperone mtHsp70 is anchored directly at the site of preprotein membrane insertion. The nucleotide exchange factor Mge1 enhances the ATPase activity of mtHsp70 and is required for the preprotein import reaction. Two novel proteins, Pam18 and Pam16, members of the inner membrane translocation channel, are required to couple the ATPase activity of mtHsp70 to the preprotein import reaction. We have collected experimental evidence indicating that mtHsp70 generates an inward directed translocation force on the polypeptide chain in transit by an ATP-regulated direct interaction with the precursor protein. The force generation results in the movement and active unfolding of the preprotein domains during the translocation process. Taken together, the chaperone mtHsp70 with its accessory proteine forms an import motor complex for mitochondrial preproteins that is driven by the hydrolysis of ATP.     

The First Steps of Protein Import into Mitochondria

Protein import into mitochondria is initiated by the recognition and binding of precursor proteins by import components in the cytosol, on the mitochondrial surface, and in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Following their synthesis on cytoplasmic ribosomes, some precursor proteins interact with molecular chaperones in the cytosol which function in maintaining the precursor protein in an import-competent state and may also aid in the delivery of the precursor to the mitochondria. A multisubunit protein import receptor then recognises and binds precursor proteins before feeding them into the outer membrane import site. Some proteins are sorted from the import site into the outer membrane, but most precursor proteins travel through the outer membrane import site into the mitochondria, where the later steps of protein import take place.     

Protein import into mitochondria of Neurospora crassa

Biogenesis of mitochondria requires import of several hundreds of different nuclear-encoded preproteins needed for mitochondrial structure and function. Import and sorting of these preproteins is a multistep process facilitated by complex proteinaceous machineries located in the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes. The translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane, the TOM complex, comprises receptors which specifically recognize mitochondrial preproteins and a protein conducting channel formed by TOM40. The TOM complex is able to insert resident proteins into the outer membrane and to translocate proteins into the intermembrane space. For import of inner membrane or matrix proteins, the TOM complex cooperates with translocases of the inner membrane, the TIM complexes. During the past 30 years, intense research on fungi enabled the identification and mechanistic characterization of a number of different proteins involved in protein translocation. This review focuses on the contributions of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa to our current understanding of mitochondrial protein import, with special emphasis on the structure and function of the TOM complex.     

Protein targeting: entropy, energetics and modular machines

New light is being shed on the mechanism of protein import into mitochondria. The inner membrane translocase can switch between modes of translocation, and assists what might be an entropic device to drive the initial entry of substrate proteins across the outer membrane.     

线粒体蛋白质运输机制

：线粒体的大多数蛋白质是由核基因编码、细胞质合成,而最终运输到线粒体。在此过程中,需要线粒体外膜和内膜的蛋白质运输机器(至少三种主要的移位酶复合物)来保证前体蛋白质的正确运输。     

Import of proteins into mitochondria: a multi-step process

Translocation of precursor proteins from the cytosol into mitochondria is a multi-step process. The generation of translocation intermediates, i.e. the reversible accumulation of precursors at distinct stages of their import pathway into mitochondria ('translocation arrest'), has allowed the experimental characterization of distinct functional steps of protein import. These steps include: ATP-dependent unfolding of precursors; specific recognition of precursors by distinct receptors on the mitochondrial surface; interaction of precursors; specific recognition of precursors by distinct receptors on the mitochondrial surface; interaction of precursors with a general insertion protein ('GIP') in the outer mitochondrial membrane; membrane-potential-dependent translocation into the inner membrane at contact sites between both membranes; proteolytic processing of precursors; and intramitochondrial sorting of precursors via the matrix space ('conservative sorting'). The functional characteristics unveiled by studying mitochondrial protein import appear to be of general interest for investigations on intracellular protein sorting.     

The Mitochondrial Import Machinery for Preproteins

Most mitochondrial proteins are transported from the cytosol into the or-ganelle. Due to the division of mitochondria into an outer and inner membrane, an inter-membrane space and a matrix, an elaborated system for recognition and transport of preproteins has evolved. The translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) and the translocases of the inner mitochondrial membrane (TIM) mediate these processes. Receptor proteins on the cytosolic face of mitochondria recognize the cargo proteins and transfer them to the general import pore (GIP) of the outer membrane. Following the passage of preproteins through the outer membrane they are transported with the aid of the TIM23 complex into either the matrix, inner membrane, or intermembrane space. Some preprotein families utilize the TIM22 complex for their insertion into the inner membrane. The identification of protein components, which are involved in these transport processes, as well as significant insights into the molecular function of some of them, has been achieved in recent years. Moreover, we are now approaching a new era in which elaborated techniques have already allowed and will enable us to gather information about the TOM and TIM complexes on an ultrastructural level.     

A MICOS–TIM22 Association Promotes Carrier Import into Human Mitochondria

Mitochondrial membrane proteins with internal targeting signals are inserted into the inner membrane by the carrier translocase (TIM22 complex). For this, precursors have to be initially directed from the TOM complex in the outer mitochondrial membrane across the intermembrane space toward the TIM22 complex. How these two translocation processes are topologically coordinated is still unresolved. Using proteomic approaches, we find that the human TIM22 complex associates with the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) complex. This association does not appear to be conserved in yeast, whereby the yeast MICOS complex instead interacts with the presequence translocase. Using a yeast mic10Δ strain and a HEK293T MIC10 knockout cell line, we characterize the role of MICOS for protein import into the mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix. We find that a physiological cristae organization promotes efficient import via the presequence pathway in yeast, while in human mitochondria, the MICOS complex is dispensable for protein import along the presequence pathway. However, in human mitochondria, the MICOS complex is required for the efficient import of carrier proteins into the mitochondrial inner membrane. Our analyses suggest that in human mitochondria, positioning of the carrier translocase at the crista junction, and potentially in vicinity to the TOM complex, is required for efficient transport into the inner membrane.     

The phosphate carrier has an ability to be sorted to either the TIM22 pathway or the TIM23 pathway for its import into yeast mitochondria

Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol, imported into mitochondria via the TOM40 (translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane 40) complex, and follow several distinct sorting pathways to reach their destination submitochondrial compartments. Phosphate carrier (PiC) is an inner membrane protein with 6 transmembrane segments (TM1-TM6) and requires, after translocation across the outer membrane, the Tim9-Tim10 complex and the TIM22 complex to be inserted into the inner membrane. Here we analyzed an in vitro import of fusion proteins between various PiC segments and mouse dihydrofolate reductase. The fusion protein without TM1 and TM2 was translocated across the outer membrane but was not inserted into the inner membrane. The fusion proteins without TM1-TM4 were not inserted into the inner membrane but instead translocated across the inner membrane. Functional defects of Tim50 of the TIM23 complex caused either by depletion of the protein or the addition of anti-Tim50 antibodies blocked translocation of the fusion proteins without TM1-TM4 across the inner membrane, suggesting that lack of TM1-TM4 led to switch of its sorting pathway from the TIM22 pathway to the TIM23 pathway. PiC thus appears to have a latent signal for sorting to the TIM23 pathway, which is exposed by reduced interactions with the Tim9-Tim10 complex and maintenance of the import competence.     

Mitochondrial protein import: two membranes,three translocases

Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesised in the cytosol and must be translocated across one or two membranes to reach their functional destination inside mitochondria. Dynamic protein complexes in the outer and inner membranes function as specific machineries that recognise the various kinds of precursor proteins and promote their translocation through protein-conducting channels. At least three major translocase complexes with a high flexibility and versatility are needed to ensure the proper import of precursor proteins into mitochondria.     

The mitochondrial import machinery for preproteins.

Most mitochondrial proteins are transported from the cytosol into the organelle. Due to the division of mitochondria into an outer and inner membrane, an intermembrane space and a matrix, an elaborated system for recognition and transport of preproteins has evolved. The translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) and the translocases of the inner mitochondrial membrane (TIM) mediate these processes. Receptor proteins on the cytosolic face of mitochondria recognize the cargo proteins and transfer them to the general import pore (GIP) of the outer membrane. Following the passage of preproteins through the outer membrane they are transported with the aid of the TIM23 complex into either the matrix, inner membrane, or intermembrane space. Some preprotein families utilize the TIM22 complex for their insertion into the inner membrane. The identification of protein components, which are involved in these transport processes, as well as significant insights into the molecular function of some of them, has been achieved in recent years. Moreover, we are now approaching a new era in which elaborated techniques have already allowed and will enable us to gather information about the TOM and TIM complexes on an ultrastructural level.