ProOmpA is stabilized for membrane translocation by either purified E. coli trigger factor or canine signal recognition particle

We have isolated large amounts of E. coli outer-membrane protein A precursor (proOmpA). Purified proOmpA is active in membrane assembly, and this assembly is saturable with respect to the precursor protein. A proOmpA-Sepharose matrix allows affinity isolation of trigger factor, a soluble, 63,000 dalton monomeric protein that stabilizes proOmpA in assembly competent form. Comparison of trigger factor's amino-terminal sequence with those in a computer data bank and with those encoded by sec genes, as well as groEL and heat shock gene dnaK, suggests that trigger factor is encoded by a previously undescribed gene. Trigger factor and proOmpA form a 1:1 complex that can be isolated by gel filtration. Purified canine signal recognition particle (SRP) can also stabilize proOmpA for membrane insertion. This postribosomal activity of SRP suggests a unifying theme in protein translocation mechanisms.     

Trigger factor depletion or overproduction causes defective cell division but does not block protein export.

Trigger factor is an abundant cytosolic protein of Escherichia coli which can stabilize proOmpA for in vitro translocation across inner membrane vesicles. The gene encoding E. coli trigger factor was isolated and sequenced, allowing construction of strains in which the expression of trigger factor is readily regulated. We found no defect in the in vivo rate of synthesis or secretion of proOmpA in trigger factor-depleted cells. The primary physiological defect in trigger factor-depleted or -overproducing cells is an enrichment of filamented cells. Filamentation of the trigger factor-overproducing strain is suppressed by a multicopy plasmid expressing the essential division gene ftsZ, suggesting that trigger factor has an important role in cell division.     

ProOmpA spontaneously folds in a membrane assembly competent state which trigger factor stabilizes.

The precursor protein proOmpA can translocate across purified Escherichia coli inner membrane vesicles in the absence of any other soluble proteins. ProOmpA, purified 2000-fold in the presence of 8 M urea, is competent for translocation following rapid renaturation via dilution. ATP, the transmembrane electrochemical potential, and functional secY protein are essential for the translocation of proOmpA renatured by dilution. The kinetics of its translocation and the level of translocation at each concentration of ATP are indistinguishable from that of proOmpA renatured by dialysis with trigger factor. After dilution, the proOmpA rapidly loses its competence for membrane assembly. However, this competence is stabilized by trigger factor. Assembly-competent proOmpA is in a protease-sensitive conformation, whereas proOmpA which has lost this competence is more resistant to degradation. This suggests that the primary role for trigger factor in in vitro protein translocation is to maintain precursor proteins in a translocation-competent conformation. We propose that a properly folded precursor protein and ATP are the only soluble components which are essential for bacterial protein translocation.     

SecA protein, a peripheral protein of the Escherichia coli plasma membrane, is essential for the functional binding and translocation of proOmpA.

We have reconstituted protein translocation across plasma membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli using purified proOmpA and trigger factor, a 63 kd soluble protein. Treatment of membrane vesicles with urea inactivates them for translocation unless a factor present in cytoplasmic extracts is added during the translocation reaction. Sedimentation analysis showed that the stimulatory activity is of distinctly higher mol. wt than trigger factor. Cytoplasmic extracts from a strain that greatly overproduces the SecA protein are highly enriched in the stimulatory activity for untreated membranes and restore translocation to urea-treated membranes, suggesting that this protein is the stimulatory factor. This assay was used to monitor the isolation of SecA protein from the overproducing strain. The purified protein is soluble, yet binds peripherally to membranes with high affinity and supports translocation. Using pure proOmpA, SecA protein, trigger factor and urea-treated membranes, the protein export process was resolved into binding and translocation steps. We find that proOmpA binds to membrane vesicles with or without SecA protein, but that translocation only occurs when SecA was bound prior to proOmpA.     

Discrimination between SRP- and SecA/SecB-dependent substrates involves selective recognition of nascent chains by SRP and trigger factor

Besides SecA and SecB, Escherichia coli cells possess a signal recognition particle (SRP) to target exported proteins to the SecY translocon. Using chemical and site-specific cross-linking in vitro, we show that SRP recognizes the first signal anchor sequence of a polytopic membrane protein (MtlA) resulting in cotranslational targeting of MtlA to SecY and phospholipids of the plasma membrane. In contrast, a possible interaction of SRP with the secretory protein pOmpA is prevented by the association of trigger factor with nascent pOmpA. Trigger factor also prevents SecA from binding to the first 125 amino acids of pOmpA when they are still associated with the ribosome. Under no experimental conditions was SecA found to interact with MtlA. Likewise, virtually no binding of trigger factor to ribosome-bound MtlA occurs even in the complete absence of SRP. Collectively, our results indicate that at the stage of nascent polypeptides, polytopic membrane proteins are selected by SRP for co-translational membrane targeting, whereas secretory proteins are directed into the SecA/SecB-mediated post-translational targeting pathway by means of their preferential recognition by trigger factor.     

Three pure chaperone proteins of Escherichia coli--SecB, trigger factor and GroEL--form soluble complexes with precursor proteins in vitro.

Diverse studies of three cytoplasmic proteins of Escherichia coli--SecB, trigger factor and GroEL--have suggested that they can maintain precursor proteins in a conformation which is competent for membrane translocation. These proteins have been termed 'chaperones'. Using purified chaperone proteins and precursor protein substrates, we find that each of these chaperones can stabilize proOmpA for translocation and for the translocation-ATPase. These chaperones bind to proOmpA to form isolable complexes. SecB and GroEL will also form complexes with another exported protein, prePhoE. In contrast, these chaperones do not form stable complexes with a variety of soluble proteins such as SecA protein, bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin or ribonuclease A. While chaperones may transiently interact with soluble proteins to catalyze their folding, the stable interaction between chaperones and presecretory proteins, maintaining an open conformation which is essential for translocation, may commit these proteins to the secretion pathway.     

Dynamic association of trigger factor with protein substrates.

Trigger factor is a ribosome-bound folding helper, which, apparently, combines two functions, chaperoning of nascent proteins and catalyzing prolyl isomerization in their folding. Immediate chaperone binding at the ribosome might interfere with rapid protein folding reactions, and we find that trigger factor indeed retards the in vitro folding of a protein with native prolyl isomers. The kinetic analysis of trigger factor binding to a refolding protein reveals that the adverse effects of trigger factor on conformational folding are minimized by rapid binding and release. The complex between trigger factor and a substrate protein is thus very short-lived, and fast-folding proteins can escape efficiently from an accidental interaction with trigger factor. Protein chains with incorrect prolyl isomers cannot complete folding and therefore can rebind for further rounds of catalysis. Unlike DnaK, trigger factor interacts with substrate proteins in a nucleotide-independent binding reaction, which seems to be optimized for high catalytic activity rather than for chaperone function. The synthetic lethality, observed when the genes for both DnaK and trigger factor are disrupted, might result from an indirect linkage. In the absence of trigger factor, folding is retarded and more aggregates form, which can neither be prevented nor disposed of when DnaK is lacking as well.     

Localization of the trigger factor binding site on the ribosomal 50S subunit

In Escherichia coli, protein folding is undertaken by three distinct sets of chaperones, the DnaK-DnaJ and GroEL-GroES systems and the trigger factor (TF). TF has been proposed to be the first chaperone to interact with the nascent polypeptide chain as it emerges from the tunnel of the 70S ribosome and thus probably plays an important role in co-translational protein folding. We have made complexes with deuterated ribosomes (50S subunits and 70S ribosomes) and protated TF and determined the TF binding site on the respective complexes using the neutron scattering technique of spin-contrast variation. Our data suggest that the TF binds in the form of a homodimer. On both the 50S subunit and the 70S ribosome, the TF position is in proximity to the tunnel exit site, near ribosomal proteins L23 and L29, located on the back of the 50S subunit. The positions deviate from one another, such that the position on the 70S ribosome is located slightly further from the tunnel than that determined for the 50S subunit alone. Nevertheless, from both determined positions interaction between TF and a short nascent chain of 57 amino acid residues would be plausible, compatible with a role for TF participation in co-translational protein folding.     

Alternate recruitment of signal recognition particle and trigger factor to the signal sequence of a growing nascent polypeptide

Different from cytoplasmic membrane proteins, presecretory proteins of bacteria usually do not require the signal recognition particle for targeting to the Sec translocon. Nevertheless signal sequences of presecretory proteins have been found in close proximity to signal recognition particle immediately after they have emerged from the ribosome. We show here that at the ribosome, the molecular environment of a signal sequence depends on the nature of downstream sequence elements that can cause an alternate recruitment of signal recognition particle and the ribosome-associated chaperone Trigger factor to a growing nascent chain. While signal recognition particle and Trigger factor might remain bound to the same ribosome, both ligands are clearly able to displace each other from a nascent chain. The data also imply that a signal sequence owes its molecular environment to the fact that it remains closely apposed to the ribosomal exit site during growth of a nascent secretory protein.     

YqjD is an inner membrane protein associated with stationary-phase ribosomes in Escherichia coli

Here, we provide evidence that YqjD, a hypothetical protein of Escherichia coli, is an inner membrane and ribosome binding protein. This protein is expressed during the stationary growth phase, and expression is regulated by stress response sigma factor RpoS. YqjD possesses a transmembrane motif in the C-terminal region and associates with 70S and 100S ribosomes at the N-terminal region. Interestingly, E. coli possesses two paralogous proteins of YqjD, ElaB and YgaM, which are expressed and bind to ribosomes in a similar manner to YqjD. Overexpression of YqjD leads to inhibition of cell growth. It has been suggested that YqjD loses ribosomal activity and localizes ribosomes to the membrane during the stationary phase.     

Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: increase in yield at the expense of folding speed

Trigger factor and DnaK protect nascent protein chains from misfolding and aggregation in the E. coli cytosol, but how these chaperones affect the mechanism of de novo protein folding is not yet understood. Upon expression under chaperone-depleted conditions, multidomain proteins such as bacterial beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) and eukaryotic luciferase fold by a rapid but inefficient default pathway, tightly coupled to translation. Trigger factor and DnaK improve the folding yield of these proteins but markedly delay the folding process both in vivo and in vitro. This effect requires the dynamic recruitment of additional trigger factor molecules to translating ribosomes. While beta-galactosidase uses this chaperone mechanism effectively, luciferase folding in E. coli remains inefficient. The efficient cotranslational domain folding of luciferase observed in the eukaryotic system is not compatible with the bacterial chaperone system. These findings suggest important differences in the coupling of translation and folding between bacterial and eukaryotic cells.     

The Listeria monocytogenes Hibernation-Promoting Factor Is Required for the Formation of 100S Ribosomes,Optimal Fitness,and Pathogenesis

During exposure to certain stresses, bacteria dimerize pairs of 70S ribosomes into translationally silent 100S particles in a process called ribosome hibernation. Although the biological roles of ribosome hibernation are not completely understood, this process appears to represent a conserved and adaptive response that contributes to optimal survival during stress and post-exponential-phase growth. Hibernating ribosomes are formed by the activity of one or more highly conserved proteins; gammaproteobacteria produce two relevant proteins, ribosome modulation factor (RMF) and hibernation promoting factor (HPF), while most Gram-positive bacteria produce a single, longer HPF protein. Here, we report the formation of 100S ribosomes by an HPF homolog in Listeria monocytogenes. L. monocytogenes 100S ribosomes were observed by sucrose density gradient centrifugation of bacterial extracts during mid-logarithmic phase, peaked at the transition to stationary phase, and persisted at lower levels during post-exponential-phase growth. 100S ribosomes were undetectable in bacteria carrying an hpf::Himar1 transposon insertion, indicating that HPF is required for ribosome hibernation in L. monocytogenes. Additionally, epitope-tagged HPF cosedimented with 100S ribosomes, supporting its previously described direct role in 100S formation. We examined hpf mRNA by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and identified several conditions that upregulated its expression, including carbon starvation, heat shock, and exposure to high concentrations of salt or ethanol. Survival of HPF-deficient bacteria was impaired under certain conditions both in vitro and during animal infection, providing evidence for the biological relevance of 100S ribosome formation.     

A ribosome-associated peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase identified as the trigger factor.

Peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIases) are enzymes that catalyse protein folding both in vitro and in vivo. We isolated a peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) which is specifically associated with the 50S subunit of the Escherichia coli ribosome. This association was abolished by adding at least 1.5 M LiCl. Sequencing the N-terminal amino acids in addition to three proteolytic fragments totalling 62 amino acids revealed that this PPIase is identical to the E.coli trigger factor. A comparison of the amino acid sequence of trigger factor with those of other PPIase families shows little similarities, suggesting that trigger factor may represent an additional family of PPIases. Trigger factor was purified to homogeneity on a preparative scale from E.coli and its enzymatic properties were studied. In its activity towards oligopeptide substrates, the trigger factor resembles the FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs). Additionally, the pattern of subsite specificities with respect to the amino acid preceding proline in Suc-Ala-Xaa-Pro-Phe-4-nitroanilides is reminiscent of FKBPs. However, the PPIase activity of the trigger factor was not inhibited by either FK506 or by cyclosporin A at concentrations up to 100 microM. In vitro, the trigger factor catalysed the proline-limited refolding of a variant of RNase T1 much better than all other PPIases that have been examined so far.     

Regulation of ribosome detachment from the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum membrane

In current models, protein translocation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) occurs in the context of two cycles, the signal recognition particle (SRP) cycle and the ribosome cycle. Both SRP and ribosomes bind to the ER membrane as a consequence of the targeting process of translocation. Whereas SRP release from the ER membrane is regulated by the GTPase activities of SRP and the SRP receptor, ribosome release from the ER membrane is thought to occur in response to the termination of protein synthesis. We report that ER-bound ribosomes remain membrane-bound following the termination of protein synthesis and in the bound state can initiate the translation of secretory and cytoplasmic proteins. Two principal observations are reported. 1) Membrane-bound ribosomes engaged in the synthesis of proteins lacking a signal sequence are released from the ER membrane as ribosome-nascent polypeptide complexes. 2) Membrane-bound ribosomes translating secretory proteins can access the translocon in an SRP receptor-independent manner. We propose that ribosome release from the ER membrane occurs in the context of protein translation, with release occurring by default in the absence of productive nascent polypeptide-membrane interactions.     

The plastid ribosomal proteins. Identification of all the proteins in the 50 S subunit of an organelle ribosome (chloroplast)

We have completed identification of all the ribosomal proteins (RPs) in spinach plastid (chloroplast) ribosomal 50 S subunit via a proteomic approach using two-dimensional electrophoresis, electroblotting/protein sequencing, high performance liquid chromatography purification, polymerase chain reaction-based screening of cDNA library/nucleotide sequencing, and mass spectrometry (reversed-phase HPLC coupled to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry). Spinach plastid 50 S subunit comprises 33 proteins, of which 31 are orthologues of Escherichia coli RPs and two are plastid-specific RPs (PSRP-5 and PSRP-6) having no homologues in other types of ribosomes. Orthologues of E. coli L25 and L30 are absent in spinach plastid ribosome. 25 of the plastid 50 S RPs are encoded in the nuclear genome and synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes, whereas eight of the plastid RPs are encoded in the plastid organelle genome and synthesized on plastid ribosomes. Sites for transit peptide cleavages in the cytosolic RP precursors and formyl Met processing in the plastid-synthesized RPs were established. Post-translational modifications were observed in several mature plastid RPs, including multiple forms of L10, L18, L31, and PSRP-5 and N-terminal/internal modifications in L2, L11 and L16. Comparison of the RPs in gradient-purified 70 S ribosome with those in the 30 and 50 S subunits revealed an additional protein, in approximately stoichiometric amount, specific to the 70 S ribosome. It was identified to be plastid ribosome recycling factor. Combining with our recent study of the proteins in plastid 30 S subunit (Yamaguchi, K., von Knoblauch, K., and Subramanian, A. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28455-28465), we show that spinach plastid ribosome comprises 59 proteins (33 in 50 S subunit and 25 in 30 S subunit and ribosome recycling factor in 70 S), of which 53 are E. coli orthologues and 6 are plastid-specific proteins (PSRP-1 to PSRP-6). We propose the hypothesis that PSRPs were evolved to perform functions unique to plastid translation and its regulation, including protein targeting/translocation to thylakoid membrane via plastid 50 S subunit.     

The activity of the acidic phosphoproteins from the 80 S rat liver ribosome

The selective removal of acidic phosphoproteins from the 80 S rat liver ribosome was accomplished by successive alcohol extractions at low salt concentration. The resulting core ribosomes lost over 90% of their translation activity and were unable to support the elongation factor 2 GTPase reaction. Both activities were partially restored when the dialyzed extracts were added back to the core ribosome. The binding of labeled adenosine diphosphoribosyl-elongation factor 2 to ribosomes was also affected by extraction and could be reconstituted, although not to the same extent as the GTPase activity associated with elongation factor 2 in the presence of the ribosome. The alcohol extracts of the 80 S ribosome contained mostly phosphoproteins P1 and P2 which could be dephosphorylated and rephosphorylated in solution by alkaline phosphatase and protein kinase, respectively. Dephosphorylation of the P1/P2 mixture in the extracts caused a decrease in the ability of these proteins to reactivate the polyphenylalanine synthesis activity of the core ribosome. However, treatment of the dephosphorylated proteins with the catalytic subunit of 3':5'-cAMP-dependent protein kinase in the presence of ATP reactivated the proteins when compared to the activity of the native extracts. Rabbit antisera raised against the alcohol-extracted proteins were capable of impairing both the polyphenylalanine synthesis reaction and the elongation factor 2-dependent GTPase reaction in the intact ribosomes.     

Role of protein L25 and its contact with protein L16 in maintaining the active state of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> ribosomes <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vivo</Emphasis>

A ribosomal protein of the L25 family specifically binding to 5S rRNA is an evolutionary feature of bacteria. Structural studies showed that within the ribosome this protein contacts not only 5S rRNA, but also the C-terminal region of protein L16. Earlier we demonstrated that ribosomes from the ΔL25 strain of Escherichia coli have reduced functional activity. In the present work, it is established that the reason for this is a fraction of functionally inactive 50S ribosomal subunits. These subunits have a deficit of protein L16 and associate very weakly with 30S subunits. To study the role of the contact of these two proteins in the formation of the active ribosome, we created a number of E. coli strains containing protein L16 with changes in its C-terminal region. We found that some mutations (K133L or K127L/K133L) in this protein lead to a noticeable slowing of cell growth and decrease in the activity of their translational apparatus. As in the case of the ribosomes from the ΔL25 strain, the fraction of 50S subunits, which are deficient in protein L16, is present in the ribosomes of the mutant strains. All these data indicate that the contact with protein L25 is important for the retention of protein L16 within the E. coli ribosome in vivo. In the light of these findings, the role of the protein of the L25 family in maintaining the active state of the bacterial ribosome is discussed.     

Ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum: a 180-kD protein identified by crosslinking to membrane-bound ribosomes is not required for ribosome binding activity

We have used the membrane-impermeable, thiol-cleavable, crosslinker 3,3'-dithio bis (sulfosuccinimidylpropionate) to identify proteins that are in the vicinity of membrane-bound ribosomes of the RER. A specific subset of RER proteins was reproducibly crosslinked to the ribosome. Immunoblot analysis of the crosslinked products with antibodies raised against signal recognition particle receptor, ribophorin I, and the 35-kD subunit of the signal sequence receptor demonstrated that these translocation components had been crosslinked to the ribosome, but each to a different extent. The most prominent polypeptide among the crosslinked products was a 180-kD protein that has recently been proposed to be a ribosome receptor (Savitz, A.J., and D.I. Meyer, 1990. Nature (Lond.). 346: 540-544). RER membrane proteins were reconstituted into liposomes and assayed with radiolabeled ribosomes to determine whether ribosome binding activity could be ascribed to the 180-kD protein. Differential detergent extraction was used to prepare soluble extracts of microsomal membrane vesicles that either contained or lacked the 180-kD protein. Liposomes reconstituted from both extracts bound ribosomes with essentially identical affinity. Additional fractionation experiments demonstrated that the bulk of the ribosome binding activity present in detergent extracts of microsomal membranes could be readily resolved from the 180-kD protein by size exclusion chromatography. Taken together, we conclude that the 180-kD protein is in the vicinity of membrane bound ribosomes, yet does not correspond to the ribosome receptor.     

Evidence that proteins S1, S11 and S21 directly participates in the binding of transfer RNA to the 30S ribosome.

In a previous publication1 we reported that the tyrosine selective reagent, tetraitromethane, causes complete inactivation of E. coli 30S ribosomes for poly U directed non-enzymatic phe-tRNA binding. This inactivation was demonstrated to be due to the chemical modification of the protein moiety of the ribosome. We have no identified the proteins of the 30S particle inactivated by this modification. Using a method of ribosome reconstruction we have found that unmodified proteins S1, S11, and S21 are essential for the restoration of the phe-tRNA binding activity of tetranitromethane inactivated ribosomes. We propose that these three proteins are intimately involved in the 30S ribosome binding site for tRNA.