Structure of a complex asparagine bound glycopeptide from horse pancreatic ribonuclease containing (2→3) and (2→6) linked sialic acid residues

The primary structure of the main glycopeptide obtained by pronase digestion of horse pancreatic ribonuclease has been investigated by 360 MHz ¹H-NMR spectroscopy and methylation analysis. The results demonstrate that this glycopeptide has the following structure:

This is the first time that the presence of both (2→3) and (2→6) linked sialic acid residues in a glycopeptide has been demonstrated.     

Studies on the stereoselective synthesis of a protected α-D-Gal-(1→2)-D-Glc fragment

A novel 1,2-cis stereoselective synthesis of protected α-D-Gal-(1→2)-D-Glc fragments was developed. Methyl 2-O-acetyl-3-O-allyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→2)-3-O-benzoyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-glucopyranoside (13), methyl 2-O-acetyl-3-O-allyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→2)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (15), methyl 2-O-acetyl-3-O-allyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→2)-3-O-benzoyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside (17), and methyl 2-O-acetyl-3-O-allyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→2)-3,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (19) were favorably obtained by coupling a new donor, isopropyl 2-O-acetyl-3-O-allyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside (2), with acceptors, methyl 3-O-benzoyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-D-glucopyranoside (4), methyl 3,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (5), methyl 3-O-benzoyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside (8), and methyl 3,4,6-tri-O-benzoyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (12), respectively. By virtue of the concerted 1,2-cis α-directing action induced by the 3-O-allyl and 4,6-O-benzylidene groups in donor 2 with a C-2 acetyl group capable of neighboring-group participation, the couplings were achieved with a high degree of α selectivity. In particular, higher α/β stereoselective galactosylation (5.0:1.0) was noted in the case of the coupling of donor 2 with acceptor 12 having a β-CH(3) at C-1 and benzoyl groups at C-4 and C-6.     

Probe design and synthesis of Galβ(1→3)[NeuAcα(2→6)]GlcNAcβ(1→2)Man motif of N-glycan

Synthesis and clusterization of Galβ(1→3)[NeuAcα(2→6)]GlcNAcβ(1→2)Man motif of the N-glycan, as the molecular probes for their biological evaluation, are reported. Key step is the quantitative and the completely α-selective sialylation of the C5-azide N-phenyltrifluoroacetimidate with the disaccharide acceptor, Galβ(1→3)GlcNTroc. Clusterization of the 16 molecules of trisaccharide motif was also achieved by the ‘self-activating click reaction’. These probes could efficiently be labeled by biotin and/or other fluorescence- or radioactive reporter groups through either cross metathesis, acylation, Cu(I)-mediated Huisgen [2+3]-cycloaddition, or the azaelectrocyclization to utilize the various biological techniques.     

(1→2) and (1→6)-linked β-d-galactofuranan of microalga Myrmecia biatorellae, symbiotic partner of Lobaria linita

A structural study of the cell wall polysaccharides of Myrmecia biatorellae, the symbiotic algal partner of the lichenized fungus Lobaria linita was carried out. It produced a rhamnogalactofuranan, with a (1→6)-β-d-galactofuranose in the main-chain, substituted at O-2 by single units of β-d-Galf, α-l-Rhap or by side chains of 2-O-linked β-d-Galf units. The structure of the polysaccharide was established by chemical and NMR spectroscopic analysis, and is new among natural polysaccharides. Moreover, in a preliminary study, this polysaccharide increased the lethality of mice submitted to polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture, probably due to the presence of galactofuranose, which have been shown to be highy immunogenic in mammals.     

Synthesis of β-D-Fructopyranosyl-(2→6)-D-glucopyranose from D-Glucose and D-Fructose by a Thermal Treatment

The synthesis is reported of β-D-fructopyranosyl-(2→6)-D-glucopyranose that had previously been isolated from a fermented plant extract as a new saccharide. A disaccharide was predominately formed from an equal amount of D-glucose and D-fructose under melting conditions at 140 °C for 60 to 90 min. This saccharide was isolated from the reaction mixture by carbon-Celite column chromatography and preparative HPLC, and was confirmed to be β-D-fructopyranosyl-(2→6)-D-glucopyranose by TOF-MS and NMR analyses.     

Synthesis of β-D-fructopyranosyl-(2→6)-D-glucopyranose from D-glucose and D-fructose by a thermal treatment

The synthesis is reported of β-D-fructopyranosyl-(2→6)-D-glucopyranose that had previously been isolated from a fermented plant extract as a new saccharide. A disaccharide was predominately formed from an equal amount of D-glucose and D-fructose under melting conditions at 140 °C for 60 to 90 min. This saccharide was isolated from the reaction mixture by carbon-Celite column chromatography and preparative HPLC, and was confirmed to be β-D-fructopyranosyl-(2→6)-D-glucopyranose by TOF-MS and NMR analyses.     

Biosynthesis of a β-(1 → 4)-mannan in fenugreek seedlings

A particulate enzymatic preparation, extracted from fenugreek seedlings (Trigonella foenum-graecum) catalyses the transfer of mannose from guanosine diphosphate-[U-¹⁴C]mannose and its incorporation into an alkali-soluble polysaccharide. Chemical and enzymatic study of this polysaccharide reveals the presence of only one type of osidic linkage, namely β-(1 → 4)-s-mannopyranosyl. The influence of some factors on this biosynthesis was studied, as well as the MW of the polysaccharide and the existence of an endogenous acceptor.     

Synthesis of p-trifluoroacetamidophenyl O-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→2)-O-α-D-mannopyranosyl-(1→4)-α-L-rhamnopyranoside

The role of exposed tyrosine side-chains in enzyme-catalysed reactions has been studied for porcine-pancreatic alpha-amylase, sweet-potato beta-amylase, and Aspergillus niger glucamylase using N-acetylimidazole as the specific protein reagent. The changes in activity binding affinity (Δk_?1/k₊₁), and kinetic parameters (K_m,k₂) due to acetylation of the phenolic hydroxyl groups have been determined. Acetylation of each enzyme occurred by an “apparent” first-order reaction with a rate constant of 0.72–1.4 x 10^?1min^?1. Acetylation increased the apparent K_m (soluble starch as the substrate) for each enzyme (appreciably for alpha-amylase and glucamylase), whereas k² remained unchanged. Similarly, for each enzyme, the binding affinity for immobilised cyclohexa-amylose decreased appreciably, whereas the catalytic activity was reduced only to a small degree (and remained unchanged for beta-amylase). It is concluded that the tyrosine groups located in the active centre of each enzyme have a substrate-binding function.     

Properties of a β-(1→4)-glucan hydrolase from Aspergillus niger

1. A beta-(1-->4)-glucan hydrolase prepared from Aspergillus niger, as described by Clarke & Stone (1965a), showed a pH optimum in the range 4.5-6 and K(m) 0.25% when acting on a cellulose dextrin sulphate substrate. 2. The hydrolase rapidly decreased the specific viscosity of carboxymethylcellulose with a small increase in the production of reducing sugars. The identity of the products of hydrolysis of cellotetraose, cellopentaose and their reduced analogues indicate a preferential cleavage of non-terminal glucosidic linkages. The enzyme may be described as beta-(1-->4)-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.4). 3. In addition to carboxymethylcellulose, cellulose dextrins, cellopentaose and cellotetraose the enzyme fraction hydrolysed lichenin, oat and barley glucans, ivory-nut mannan and a glucomannan from Konjak flour. No hydrolysis of wheat-straw beta-(1-->4)-xylan, Lupinus albus beta-(1-->4)-galactan, pneumococcal type III polysaccharide, chitin, hyaluronic acid, laminarin, pachydextrins, carboxymethylpachyman or beta-(1-->3)-oligoglucosides was detected. 4. The hydrolase showed no transglycosylase activity from cellodextrin or cellopentaose substrates to glucose or methanol acceptors. 5. The hydrolysis of cellodextrins was inhibited completely by 1.0mm-Hg(2+), 0.7mm-phenylmercuric nitrate and 1.0mm-iodine.     

The location of (1→3)-β-glucans in the walls of pollen tubes of Nicotiana alata using a (1→3)-β-glucan-specific monoclonal antibody

The location of the (13)--glucan, callose, in the walls of pollen tubes in the style of Nicotiana alata Link et Otto was studied using specific monoclonal antibodies. The antibodies were raised against a laminarinhaemocyanin conjugate. One antibody selected for further characterization was specific for (13)--glucans and showed no binding activity against either a cellopentaose-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate or a (13, 14)--glucan-BSA conjugate. Binding was inhibited by (13)--oligoglucosides (DP, 3–6) with maximum competition being shown by laminaripentaose and laminarihexaose, indicating that the epitope included at least five (13)--linked glucopyranose residues. The monoclonal antibody was determined to have an affinity constant for laminarihexaose of 2.7. 10⁴M^–1. When used with a second-stage gold-labelled, rabbit anti-mouse antibody, the monoclonal antibody probe specifically located the (13)--glucan in the inner wall layer of thin sections of the N. alata pollen tubes.Abbreviations BSA bovine serum albumin - PBS phosphate-buffered saline - ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent assay - DP degree of polymerization - PVC polyvinyl chloride P.J.M. is an Australian Postdoctoral Research Fellow. We wish to thank Joan Hoogenraad for her technical assistance with the tissue culture, and Althea Wright for her assistance in the preparation of this paper.     

Conformational properties of a cyclic oligosaccharide: cyclotrikis-(1→6)-[α-D-glucopyranosyl-(1→4)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]

The title compound is a cyclic oligosaccharide having six glucopyranose residues linked alternatively by -(14) and -(16) glycosidic linkages. Like cyclodextrin analogues it is expected to exhibit an internal cavity and to form inclusion complexes with other species. In order to investigate its conformational preferences, an extensive conformational search was carried out using a combination of Metropolis Monte-Carlo (MMC) procedure in the glycosidic torsion angle space and molecular mechanics procedures. To this end a specific program (METROCYCLIX) was developed. To reduce the MMC search, conformational maps of parent disaccharides were considered as starting entries. Fully minimized conformations were gathered into families using a clustering technique based on RMS fitting over the glycosidic torsion angle values. A wide range of local energy minima were identified in spite of ring closure conditions that constrained the structure of the oligosaccharide. Low energy conformers were stabilized by intramolecular interactions between distant residues. From the Bolzmann population of the best structures derived from the clustering results, various average properties were calculated and compared with experimental data obtained by high resolution NMR. Interpretation of these experimental values (heteronuclear coupling constants, rotating frame nuclear Overhauser effects, relaxation times) relies on the use of Karplus like equations (coupling constants) and analysis of the full relaxation rate matrix treatment (ROE). The quality of the molecular modelling strategy used is assessed by the agreement obtained between calculated and measured observables.     

The synthesis of O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-d-glucopyranosyl)-(1→4)-N-acetylnormuramoyl-l-α-aminobutanoyl-d-isoglutamine

Benzyl 2-acetamido-3-O-allyl-6-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-4-O-(3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-2-phthalimido-β-d-glucopyranosyl)- α-d-glucopyranoside (4) was obtained in high yield on using the silver triflate method in the absence of base. Compound 4 was converted in six steps into benzyl 2-acetamido-4-O-(2-acetamido-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-β-d-glucopyranosyl)-6-O-benzyl-3-O-(carboxymethyl)-2-deoxy-α-d- glucopyranoside, which was coupled with the benzyl ester of l-α-aminobutanoyl-d-isoglutamine and the product hydrogenolyzed to afford the title compound. O-Benzylation of benzyl 2-acetamido-4-O-(2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-d-glucopyranosyl)-3-O-allyl-6-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-α-d-glucopyranoside with benzyl bromide and barium hydroxide in N,N-dimethylformamide is strongly exhanced by sonication of the reaction mixture.     

The structure of a β-(1→3)-d-glucan from yeast cell walls

Yeast glucan as normally prepared by various treatments of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell walls to remove mannan and glycogen is still heterogeneous. The major component (about 85%) is a branched beta-(1-->3)-glucan of high molecular weight (about 240000) containing 3% of beta-(1-->6)-glucosidic interchain linkages. The minor component is a branched beta-(1-->6)-glucan. A comparison of our results with those of other workers suggests that different glucan preparations may differ in the degree of heterogeneity and that the major beta-(1-->3)-glucan component may vary considerably in degree of branching.     

Structural and Enzymatic Characterization of Os3BGlu6, a Rice β-Glucosidase Hydrolyzing Hydrophobic Glycosides and (1→3)- and (1→2)-Linked Disaccharides

Glycoside hydrolase family 1 (GH1) β-glucosidases play roles in many processes in plants, such as chemical defense, alkaloid metabolism, hydrolysis of cell wall-derived oligosaccharides, phytohormone regulation, and lignification. However, the functions of most of the 34 GH1 gene products in rice (Oryza sativa) are unknown. Os3BGlu6, a rice β-glucosidase representing a previously uncharacterized phylogenetic cluster of GH1, was produced in recombinant Escherichia coli. Os3BGlu6 hydrolyzed p-nitrophenyl (pNP)-β-d-fucoside (k_cat/K_m = 67 mm⁻¹ s⁻¹), pNP-β-d-glucoside (k_cat/K_m = 6.2 mm⁻¹ s⁻¹), and pNP-β-d-galactoside (k_cat/K_m = 1.6 mm⁻¹s⁻¹) efficiently but had little activity toward other pNP glycosides. It also had high activity toward n-octyl-β-d-glucoside and β-(1→3)- and β-(1→2)-linked disaccharides and was able to hydrolyze apigenin β-glucoside and several other natural glycosides. Crystal structures of Os3BGlu6 and its complexes with a covalent intermediate, 2-deoxy-2-fluoroglucoside, and a nonhydrolyzable substrate analog, n-octyl-β-d-thioglucopyranoside, were solved at 1.83, 1.81, and 1.80 Å resolution, respectively. The position of the covalently trapped 2-F-glucosyl residue in the enzyme was similar to that in a 2-F-glucosyl intermediate complex of Os3BGlu7 (rice BGlu1). The side chain of methionine-251 in the mouth of the active site appeared to block the binding of extended β-(1→4)-linked oligosaccharides and interact with the hydrophobic aglycone of n-octyl-β-d-thioglucopyranoside. This correlates with the preference of Os3BGlu6 for short oligosaccharides and hydrophobic glycosides.β-Glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) have a wide range of functions in plants, including acting in cell wall remodeling, lignification, chemical defense, plant-microbe interactions, phytohormone activation, activation of metabolic intermediates, and release of volatiles from their glycosides (Esen, 1993). They fulfill these roles by hydrolyzing the glycosidic bond at the nonreducing terminal glucosyl residue of a glycoside or an oligosaccharide, thereby releasing Glc and an aglycone or a shortened carbohydrate. The aglycone released from the glycoside may be a monolignol, a toxic compound, or a compound that further reacts to release a toxic component, an active phytohormone, a reactive metabolic intermediate, or a volatile scent compound (Brzobohatý et al., 1993; Dharmawardhama et al., 1995; Reuveni et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2006; Barleben et al., 2007; Morant et al., 2008). Indeed, the wide range of glucosides of undocumented functions found in plants suggests that many β-glucosidase functions may remain to be discovered.Plant β-glucosidases fall into related families that have been classified as glycosyl hydrolase (GH) families GH1, GH3, and GH5 (Henrissat, 1991; Coutinho and Henrissat, 1998, 1999). Of these, GH1 has been most thoroughly documented and shown to comprise a gene family encoding 40 putative functional GHs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and 34 in rice (Oryza sativa) in addition to a few pseudogenes (Xu et al., 2004; Opassiri et al., 2006). In addition to β-glucosidases, plant GH1 members include β-mannosidases (Mo and Bewley, 2002), β-thioglucosidases (Burmeister et al., 1997), and disaccharidases such as primeverosidase (Mizutani et al., 2002) as well as hydroxyisourate hydrolase, which hydrolyzes the internal bond in a purine ring rather than a glycosidic bond (Raychaudhuri and Tipton, 2002). The specificity for the glycone in GH1 enzymes varies. Some enzymes are quite specific for β-d-glucosides or β-d-mannosides, while many accept either β-d-glucosides or β-d-fucosides, and some also hydrolyze β-d-galactosides, β-d-xylosides, and α-l-arabinoside (Esen, 1993). However, most GH1 enzymes are thought to hydrolyze glucosides in the plant, and it is the aglycone specificity that determines the functions of most GH1 enzymes.Aglycone specificity of GH1 β-glucosidases ranges from rather broad to absolutely specific for one substrate and is not obvious from sequence similarity. For instance, maize (Zea mays) ZmGlu1 β-glucosidase hydrolyzes a range of glycosides, including its natural substrate, 2-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOAGlc), but not dhurrin, whereas sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Dhr1, which is 72% identical to ZmGlu1, only hydrolyzes its natural cyanogenic substrate dhurrin (Verdoucq et al., 2003). Similarly, despite sharing over 80% amino acid sequence identity, the legume isoflavonoid β-glucosidases dalcochinase from Dalbergia cochinchinensis and Dnbglu2 from Dalbergia nigrescens hydrolyze each other''s natural substrate very poorly (Chuankhayan et al., 2007). Thus, small differences in the amino acid sequence surrounding the active site may be expected to account for significant differences in substrate specificity.GH1 is classified in GH clan A, which consists of GH families whose members have a (β/α)₈-barrel structure with the catalytic acid/base on strand 4 of the β-barrel and the catalytic nucleophile on strand 7 (Henrissat et al., 1995; Jenkins et al., 1995). As such, all GH1 enzymes have similar overall structures, but it has been noted that four variable loops at the C-terminal end of the β-barrel strands, designated A, B, C, and D, account for much of the differences in the active site architecture (Sanz-Aparicio et al., 1998). The similar structures with great diversity in substrate specificity make plant GH1 enzymes an ideal model system to investigate the structural basis of substrate specificity. To date, seven plant β-glucosidase structures have been reported, including three closely related chloroplastic enzymes from maize (Czjzek et al., 2000, 2001), sorghum (Verdoucq et al., 2004), and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Sue et al., 2006), the cytoplasmic strictosidine β-glucosidase from Rauvolfia serpentine (Barleben et al., 2007), and the secreted enzymes white clover (Trifolium repens) cyanogenic β-glucosidase (Barrett et al., 1995), white mustard (Sinapsis alba) myrosinase (thioglucosidase; Burmeister et al., 1997), and rice Os3BGlu7 (BGlu1; Chuenchor et al., 2008). These enzymes hydrolyze substrates with a range of structures, but they cannot account for the full range of β-glucosidase substrates available in plants, and determining the structural differences that bring about substrate specificity differences in even closely related GH1 enzymes has proven tricky (Verdoucq et al., 2003, 2004; Sue et al., 2006; Chuenchor et al., 2008).Amino acid sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of GH1 enzymes encoded by the rice genome showed that there are eight clusters containing both rice and Arabidopsis proteins that are more closely related to each other than they are to enzymes from the same plants outside the clusters (Fig. 1; Opassiri et al., 2006). In addition, there are a cluster of sixteen putative β-glucosidases and a cluster of myrosinases in Arabidopsis without any closely related rice counterparts. Comparison with characterized GH1 enzymes from other plants reveals other clusters of related enzymes not found in rice or Arabidopsis, including the chloroplastic enzymes, from which the maize, sorghum, and wheat structures are derived, and the cytoplasmic metabolic enzymes, from with the strictosidine hydrolase structure is derived (Fig. 1). Therefore, although the known structures provide good tools for molecular modeling of plant enzymes, most rice and Arabidopsis GH1 enzymes lack a close correspondence in sequence and functional evolution to these structures, suggesting that the variable loops that determine the active site may be different. It would be useful, therefore, to know the structures and substrate specificities of representative members of each of the eight clusters seen in rice and Arabidopsis. To begin to acquire this information, we have expressed Os3BGlu6, a member of cluster At/Os 1 in Figure 1, characterized its substrate specificity, and determined its structure alone and in complex with a glycosyl intermediate and a nonhydrolyzable substrate analog.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Simplified phylogenetic tree of the amino acid sequences of eukaryotic GH1 proteins with known structures and those of rice and Arabidopsis GH1 gene products. The protein sequences of the eukaryotic proteins with known structures are marked with four-character PDB codes for one of their structures, including Trifolium repens cyanogenic β-glucosidase (1CBG; Barrett et al., 1995), Sinapsis alba myrosinase (1MYR; Burmeister et al., 1997), Zea mays ZmGlu1 β-glucosidase (1E1F; Czjzek et al., 2000), Sorghum bicolor Dhr1 dhurrinase (1V02; Verdoucq et al., 2004), Triticum aestivum β-glucosidase (2DGA; Sue et al., 2006), Rauvolfia serpentina strictosidine β-glucosidase (2JF6; Barleben et al., 2007), and Oryza sativa Os3BGlu7 (BGlu1) β-glucosidase (2RGL; Chuenchor et al., 2008) from plants, along with Brevicoryne brassicae myrosinase (1WCG; Husebye et al., 2005), Homo sapiens cytoplasmic (Klotho) β-glucosidase (2E9M; Hayashi et al., 2007), and Phanerochaete chrysosporium (2E3Z; Nijikken et al., 2007), while those encoded in the Arabidopsis and rice genomes are labeled with the systematic names given by Xu et al. (2004) and Opassiri et al. (2006), respectively. One or two example proteins from each plant are given for each of the eight clusters of genes shared by Arabidopsis (At) and rice (Os) and the Arabidopsis-specific clusters At I (β-glucosidases) and At II (myrosinases), with the number of Arabidopsis or rice enzymes in each cluster given in parentheses. These sequences were aligned with all of the Arabidopsis and rice sequences in ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997), the alignment was manually edited, all but representative sequences were removed, and the tree was calculated by the neighbor-joining method, bootstrapped with 1,000 trials, and then drawn with TreeView (Page, 1996). The grass plastid β-glucosidases, which are not represented in Arabidopsis and rice, are shown in the group marked “Plastid.” Percentage bootstrap reproducibility values are shown on internal branches where they are greater than 60%. Except those marked by asterisks, all external branches represent groups with 100% bootstrap reproducibility. To avoid excess complexity, those groups of sequences marked with asterisks are not monophyletic and represent more branches within the designated cluster than are shown. For a complete phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis and rice GH1 proteins, see Opassiri et al. (2006).